Great Players of the Past: Joseph Blackburne
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 тра 2023
- Check out Ben's Chessable courses here! www.chessable.com/author/BenF... GM Ben Finegold discusses games of Joseph Blackburne. This lecture was recorded on Nov. 7, 2017 at CCSCATL as part of our Great Players of the Past lecture series.
Games discussed:
NN vs. Joseph Blackburne, England (1880)
Joseph Blackburne vs. NN (1863)
Joseph Blackburne vs. Steinitz Wilhelm, London (1883)
Edward Bird vs. Joseph Blackburne, London (1886)
If you're interested in sponsoring a lecture of your choice, email Karen at karen@atlchessclub.com
Signup or gift a chess.com Premium membership to get access to their lessons, remove ads, improve your chess, AND help Ben at the same time!! Upgrade your chess.com membership or join! - go.chess.com/finegold.
Buy Merch today! ccscatlmerch.com/
Watch live at / itsbenandkaren
Donations are appreciated at: streamlabs.com/itsBenandKaren...
Follow me on Twitter: / ben_finegold
#benfinegold #chess #JosephBlackburne - Ігри
Great videos of the past!
Black death
The love of the game that Ben has is quite infectious. You can tell he really means it when he says he would like to have games like that first one, it must be good to sac all the pieces in that kind of style!
Blackburne loved to annotate games. He annotated many more games than his contemporaries. His annotations weren't perfect but they are usually entertaining and included ideas of his and of the time in which he played. He also played many simultaneous exhibitions, so many in fact that he occasionally played the same game more than once from start to finish. Games like that were often 15 to 20 moves long. Blackburne was a tremendous blindfold chess player and he explained that he started playing simultaneous blindfold exhibitions after watching Louis Paulsen do it, thereby acquiring inspiration to do the same.
I think "Great player of the past" is the most intersting chess lecture on UA-cam. I'm a hardcore Ben Finegold fan!!
NN - Blackburne is one of my favorite pre-1900s game. Thanks Ben!
NN needs to up his game, I haven't seen him win a single time
@@kevinstrand4596you didn’t see NN - NN? NN won that one
16:29 This is why Bens the best lmao
these lectures are so fucking good
*FOR JEROME*
Its what Jerome would have wanted
So enjoyable to be properly yelled at! 50 nuances of Ben Finegold
That mate at 16:15 is genius.
Thanks Ben! You really take care that my Sundays are never boring, because there's always some video from you on UA-cam that I did not watch yet! 🍀🙏😃
00:00:09 Lecture start and other nonsence
00:03:35 NN vs. Joseph Blackburne, England (1880)
00:10:02 Joseph Blackburne vs. NN (1863)
00:17:55 Joseph Blackburne vs. Steinitz Wilhelm, London (1883)
00:30:11 Edward Bird vs. Joseph Blackburne, London (1886)
00:45:03 Final remarks
Like how the bishop left mustache in 19:07.
Alejandro Ramirez covered Blackburn years ago on St. Louis Chess, and this video is great as well. Blackburn's tactical eye is stunning. Amazing he was still playing the greats so late in life. Hate to play the "if he played now" game... but surely the man would've been a Super GM starting a young age in the modern era. However, the true Blackburn would've hatef it - the lack of amazing tactics available against top GM's today would've killed him.
These are my favorite
You should lecture on NN...but I'm guessing it would be hard to find games that he won...
Someone should Sponsor this idea. Could make a great video. Ben should consider to wear a Hoody
Hey Ben. After Bf5 also mate is Qg3 If then h3xf4 then Qh4 Mate else Qh7 mate. Although Qxh6 Bxe4 is prettier....
After the White queen takes the rook, the Black queen to g6, threatening mate. White pawn takes knight, then Black queen to h4 mate.
This is my favorite chess series on UA-cam. Would you do emil diemer please and thank you :D
I'd forgotten about "Rover"!
Chessmetrics Player Profile: Joseph Blackburne
Born: 1841-Dec
Died: 1924-Sep
Best World Rank: #2 (77 different months between the September 1873 rating list and the February 1889 rating list )
Highest Rating: 2748 on the August 1886 rating list, #2 in world, age 44y8m
Black Death! That's a great name!!
Before the clever bishop move, didn't Q-G3 force mate?
White plays Qxh7 and then takes the Knight. Black can't check on the h file anymore.
@@aarons3014 right, but that idea works with ..Bd7/e6/f5 - Qxa8 Qg3
According to cheesmetrics Joseph Blackburne was #2 of the world in 77 different months between the September 1873 and the February 1889 in the rating list. Most of the time after Steinitz. Maybe all of the time, he was 2nd.
Yeah, I don't think he was ever truly No. 2 because of Zuckertort in particular and to some extent Paulsen and Tarrasch, but he was a really strong tournament player, so it's believable on a ratings basis.
@@jimmyfuckthechainofcommand4332 OK. I clicked through the the chessmetrics months. And yes, Blackburne was also 2nd behind Zukertort. Often Blackburne was 3rd after Steinitz and Zukertort. But there were turnaments he came ahead of Zukertort. E.g. Berlin, 1881 .
The peak of Tarrasch was a later. In his younger years Tarrsch seems to be a bit overrated. Tarrasch was 5 years older than Lasker, but Tarrasch didn't get into the top 5 until Lasker was already #1. Tarrasch was never better rated than Blackburne, before Lasker was alredy number 1.
Edit: Louis Paulsen was 9 years older. He was a few month better than Blackburne, when Blackburne was good. In normal case Blackburne was much better because Paulsen was getting old.
@@ThueringerKloss Got it. The Tarrasch part is a bit of a surprise. I would've thought he had a few years in the top 5 prior to Lasker becoming the best. But I can believe that because of his main profession. And yeah, Paulsen explanation makes sense as he was aging at that point. I guess Zukertort (thanks for the correction) is the main one who was ahead as I thought.
shout out dave west
Dave West honorary GMStudent
@@sublimeade the truth hurts
16:36 wake up call
white sacrificed 2 pieces
black sacrificed all of his pieces, while the rest checkmated the opponents king.
You should say coffee and
This is how I play but somehow I lose (800elo)
If you wanna make a good sacrifice you have to think many, many moves ahead. It's worth to note that back in these days chess games used to be played without a clock so the players sat to think for quite a while before making something like, say, a queen sac
You did say that Tarrasch belonged in the Tarrasch can, tho.