Harry Nelson Pillsbury's brilliancy vs Emanuel Lasker | 1896
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- In 1896 Harry Nelson Pillsbury played one of the great games of chess against the current World Chess Champion Emanuel Lasker at the Nuremberg Tournament. This game would, by tournament's end, earn Pillsbury the brilliancy prize. Against Lasker's French Defense, Pillsbury opts for a line that at first grabs a space advantage on the kingside, and soon thereafter a space advantage on the queenside. The latter however would not be without its drawbacks as Lasker is keen to highlight. Despite Lasker's steps to ensure there would be no successful breakthrough on the kingside, Pillsbury shows otherwise by unleashing one of the most memorable middlegame combinations, one that would draw our attention to the whole chessboard.
PGN:
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. f4 c5 6. dxc5 Nc6
7. a3 Nxc5 8. b4 Nd7 9. Bd3 a5 10. b5 Ncb8 11. Nf3 Nc5 12. Be3
Nbd7 13. O-O g6 14. Ne2 Be7 15. Qe1 Nb6 16. Nfd4 Bd7 17. Qf2
Nba4 18. Rab1 h5 19. b6 Nxd3 20. cxd3 Bxa3 21. f5 gxf5 22. Nf4
h4 23. Ra1 Be7 24. Rxa4 Bxa4 25. Ndxe6 fxe6 26. Nxe6 Bd7
27. Nxd8 Rxd8 28. Bc5 Rc8 29. Bxe7 Kxe7 30. Qe3 Rc6 31. Qg5+
Kf7 32. Rc1 Rxc1+ 33. Qxc1 Rc8 34. Qe1 h3 35. gxh3 Rg8+
36. Kf2 a4 37. Qb4 Rg6 38. Kf3 a3 39. Qxa3 Rxb6 40. Qc5 Re6
41. Qc7 Ke7 42. Kf4 b6 43. h4 Rc6 44. Qb8 Be8 45. Kxf5 Rh6
46. Qc7+ Kf8 47. Qd8 b5 48. e6 Rh7 49. Ke5 b4 50. Qd6+
Internet Chess Club (ICC)
Software: Blitzin
bit.ly/179O93N
Discount Code: CHESSNETWORK
I'm a self-taught National Master in chess out of Pennsylvania, USA who was introduced to the game by my father in 1988 at the age of 8. The purpose of this channel is to share my knowledge of chess to help others improve their game. I enjoy continuing to improve my understanding of this great game, albeit slowly. Consider subscribing here on UA-cam for frequent content, and/or connecting via any or all of the below social medias. Your support is greatly appreciated. Take care, bye. :D
★ LIVESTREAM / chessnetwork
★ FACEBOOK / chessnetwork
★ TWITTER / chessnetwork
★ GOOGLE+ google.com/+Che...
★ PATREON / chessnetwork
★ DONATE www.paypal.com...
You're on fire, Jerry! Your upload rate is astonishing!
Dewdew7 - I love the frequent videos Jerry! Thanks for taking the time out of your day to not only enjoy making the videos yourself, but to entertain your loyal and respectful audience! Have a good night Jerry
Thank you for spoiling us, Jerry! These are the best!
Pillsbury was an incredible player. So bad that his career was so short. Other top American players from the past, Morphy, Fischer also played - for different reasons - so short. They could contribute much more to the chess history...
Really enjoyed these last few videos. Many thanks to you for all of this content.
these videos are very informative. Thank you for the steady diet of these kinds of uploads
Jerry, you're spoiling us with your upload schedule!
Any thoughts on another shirt run?
Just as I finished preparing some food, always good timing, Jerry.
beautiful breakthrough on the king side by Pillsbury.
Agreed. Is Silver Surfer a fan of Solomon's Key as well? :)
:)no. i like Silver Surfer ...watched animated series when i was a kid.
Ah okay. Cause I have a Solomon's Key video. :)
ua-cam.com/video/QnS0mVPmvUE/v-deo.html
thanks for the link :). the guy Dana looks like pied piper.
Wow, 11 moves in and black has only one piece developed. Cool game Jerry, thanks for the upload!
I love ur GM game annotations!!!
👍
YASSS MOAR MOAR MOAR!!!!!
analyse every game ever played !!!!
Best Chess Battle Ever!!! Your the best JERRY!!!!!
Since you say how the king was a fighting piece Jerry, I'm reminded of my question I always forget to ask on one of your videos. Were there any famous or high profile games ever played with an extremely active/fighting king piece? Love your videos. Thanks.
The Immortal King Walk immediately comes to my mind.
www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1124533
Thank you so much Afro, I appreciate this!
Great vid. Thanks, Jerry
Thank you Phil. 👍
Very wonderful video
i wounder what the computer would had done in that position with giving up the queen??
Pillsbury was also one of the residents of the Ajeeb automaton.
A question from an amateur: On move 22 why doesn't black move his bishop to c5 and pick up the pawn on b6?
By playing Nxc5 maybe he wanted to capture the bishop if it moved to d3, or provoke that b4 move to create some queenside weaknesses to work with.
ChessNetwork He is talking about move 22. I think you’re on a different part of the game.
Pillsbury! Woohoo!
Up with pillsbury
Geez, I'm 34, time to get busy.
If only we had penicillin in 1906.
Like!
Joosss
Not so smart, he died of siphyllis
First
Milind Foulger darn
He could have been a great World Champion
King of the chess game reviews!
**Reads the first word of the video title**
"COME ON HARRY!!!"
"Oh... It's not that harry" :(
An excellent example of world-class calculation by Pillsbury. Good video, Jerry. Always instructive!
Absolutely loving the content you've been putting out these few weeks. These classic game videos are my favourites.
👍
Very strange how the three American chess geniuses - Morphy, Pillsbury, Fischer - all had such short peaks, and sad endings.
5:00-5:07 "Middlegames are one of the most difficult points in a game"
The other difficult points being... openings and endgames...
Anyway, nice analysis :).
:)
It is sad that on those days syphilis was a killer, it is sad that morphy and fischer suffered from madness and paranoia
7:23 illuminati confirmed
I love this channel so much. I appreciate all your hard work!
What about a series about the stylistic particularities of all the world champions?
those knights wow
I've never seen like/dislike ratio and comments on someone's videos so overwhelmingly positive. Well deserved Jerry, you are the man!
Everybody's talking at me...I don't hear a word they're saying. Only the echoes of my mind...
I'm new to your channel but highly impressed by your presentations and commentaries. Thanks.
"...lived until...xx" Why you give me existential crises eh?
3rd greatest American to ever play the game... Fischer, Morphy, Pillsbury.
Hey jerry do you think you could do a review on nigel short vs bobby ficher on line they are strange games just want to know you're thoughts on their games and was it really ficher playing.
Nigel short vs some guy with an engine.... those games have been extensively reviewed,.,. .including some reviewers who were able to detremine which engine the guy used....
That's so interesting!! I admire grandmasters' boldness when they sacrifice! I'm too much of a chicken sometimes! One day, one day :)
please make videos on world chess championship 2017 recent matches
I wish he posted 5 a day. So id never run out of content to watch. His explanations are amazing.
413 to 1 likes to dislike ratio is one of the highest i've ever seen, and for good reason! keep up the good work Jerry!
Pillsbury's like Koufax, but Sandy's still kickin"!
I wish I could subscribe twice to let you know how much I love these analysis videos.
Thanks, J, a beautiful game, with two of my favourites: Lasker, and the immortal HNP ( on top form ).
It was a beautiful sequence- Lasker appeared insufficiently wary!
Mr. Jerry, what's your full name n fide rtg?
Thanks Jerry! That was an interesting game
I Likes yours videos. Thx a lot.
1:43 so many blue lines and only 2 seconds to follow
Hell yea, Massachusetts represent!!
I love a good historic chess match w/ analysis!
Well done. Thanks,
Pillsbury > Lasker???
What a beautiful game.
same... 2 other videos weren't cutting it, and i thought jerry will come through as alwasys
having lasagna btw
sometimes I c ur videos saying let's c wat he has to say...respect though..
👍
2 stronk
whos side who ?
Well explained! Thank you very much, Jerry
Thanks Dan 😎👍
Hi Jerry.
Nice game. Fantastic deep knight move👍. As usual nice commentary 👍👏
So I'm confused did Pillsbury play g4...Or are demonstrating what would have happened if g4 was played?? 🤔
On g4 I shared “This would be a highly committal move.” I’m going through a possible line. I could have been clearer.
@@ChessNetwork Right because sometimes it gets a bit confusing when you're breaking it down and adding in other potential good moves that very well could have changed the game had they been played.
Although I certainly understand the reasoning behind it.
It might be a little more complicated to do. But maybe try doing a game where you're laying out the players moves with minimal added on moves. Then at the end you go back to a few key moments where the game could of gone in other directions..
When I go back & analyze my games. A lot of times I'll be incredulous as to how I could of missed such an in my face move!?... And the answer always hovering around- because you're under pressure.. People tend not to talk about that aspect of Chess as much. But it's a real factor for sure.. Some my most successful games have been when I'm relaxed. So that's why some of their moves are so incredible here. Simply because they were able to make them under intense pressure!! Make people understand why this players from yester-year, & their moves are so Amazing!!
Beautiful, clear chessboard.