@@Citrusautomatoni guess is the type of person that says "is not a real AI just a language model" and basically would say that even a GAI(general aritificial intelingence) isnt a real AI
yeah, Ive probably read more web novels/light novels that I really enjoyed compared to traditional books, of course a traditional book has better word structure and vocabulary, but a fun idea trumps that 100 to 1
It's waaay more than that. It's not just the simple idea (which is a factor), but also how these simple novels are written by normal people. Genius authors try so hard to be realistic that you end up with critically-acclaimed but totally unrealistic books; therefore they're impossible to relate or identify anywhere. No sir, people are simple and speak in simple terms, with very simple motivations. You don't think it too deeply. Life is fun and fascinating and simple. We're vulgar, we have a vocabulary of like 10 words and say the cringiest sh like there's no tomorrow. We don't have none of those word structures and gramerz. And so the guy that writes random stuff after getting home for work nails down the most real story ever, because he lives it himself. Libraries and a small circle of intellectuals don't get you that. You have to get out of there to know humanity. They nail it: Teenagers do indeed fall for the pretty girl with similar hobbies (second part optional) in 10s flat. People do dream to be kings or go on adventures for no other reason than to have some fun. Couples fight, kids get bullied, overblown drama takes place, for no reason whatsoever. And from there you go wherever, with no deep plans, with a simple backstory (if any at all relevant), and succeed for no apparent reason except for "luck and effort ig" - just like real human life. Tolkien nailed it despite being a genius though, but for that one it'll take a long ahh review from me. Maybe another time.
-_- Lol, yeah. Tbh, I agreed w/ Huxley that Brave New World was better. I even enjoyed Animal Farm more than 1984. I mean, it’s not terrible, but it’s just kinda… meh.
It's not about the "quality", it's about the philosophy. *Literally everything this book describes is happening in real life today.* Information online can be edited any day, media push the governments will and wishes, certain entities are publicly trashed and the population is encouraged to trash them too (the minute of hate!). Doublethink is extremely present in corporate speeches. Politicians and businessmen give speeches filled with contradictions. Most recent example is Ubisoft and their "apology" for Assassin's Creed:Shadow. And Newspeak? the language built to cancel any negative opinion? Does it ring any bell? It should, given how any negative backlash for any big movie or game is widely claimed to be review bombing. UA-cam hiding dislikes goes that way too, and political correctness as a whole is about erasing any word considered bad. Orwell is the wisest man ever.
@@Dante02d12 Of course the philosophy is great. I liked that part. I’m not hating on Orwell. I mean that excluding the philosophy it’s mediocre. I know the philosophy is the main point anyways, but… well. The thing is, I like thinking about these things already, so I think of 1984 more as a treatise, and I’m sure many people do too. As a fiction book…Winston is boring, Julia is boring, and I couldn’t care less for either of their individual stories. That’s just my opinion. Most people in this comments section will be used to whatever trashy YA dystopian fiction they can find, stuff that turns their brains off and requires no critical thinking. They want some epic romance, not a story about hopelessness, totalitarianism, and surveillance. In that case, it wouldn’t be the book for them. It’s decent for someone who wants to think about its messages, and overrated for everyone else.
Depends on what you find interesting really. I have seen people enjoy the strangest things. Anyway, 1984 is basically a nom-fiction book at this point. It's like if someone wrote WW2 but swapped around the countries and names.
If you didn't read 1984 in school then I feel sorry for your school district. I'd argue it's more important than ever since social media has empowered cancel culture.
@@bored_person I think OP is reffering to the way children are told to denounce their parents whenever they see them commit a "crime". Since the government decides what is a crime and what isn't, it looks like cancel culture, in the sense that people are arbitrarily convicted. Anyway, the book is still the most essential to read in life.
😶
Haha jk...
Unless?
𝗦𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲: THE RETURN of the DEV STREAM
www.twitch.tv/videos/2204463548
JK Rowling. Gottem
"Disappointingly predictable" 🤣 Neuro I kneel
At least it's not I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream
Why not?
@@Phill_2because of the implications
@@Phill_2the antagonist of the book is an AI who has dedicated its entire existence to torturing the protagonists
The British joke was so funny
Pretty ironic coming from "AI"
Would've been much more ironic if it was I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream
Why AI in quotes?
@@Citrusautomatoni guess is the type of person that says "is not a real AI just a language model" and basically would say that even a GAI(general aritificial intelingence) isnt a real AI
@@mariox204that last part turns your whole comment into a straw man.
@@mariox204 or it could be the other end of the spectrum where they think neuro is just vedal omegalul
literally 1984 smh
The teeth chomp ASMR
I'm going through the VoD now and I can't unhear it.. Why did you do this to me 🥲
You mean it's not required reading in Airstrip One?
yeah, Ive probably read more web novels/light novels that I really enjoyed compared to traditional books, of course a traditional book has better word structure and vocabulary, but a fun idea trumps that 100 to 1
It's waaay more than that. It's not just the simple idea (which is a factor), but also how these simple novels are written by normal people.
Genius authors try so hard to be realistic that you end up with critically-acclaimed but totally unrealistic books; therefore they're impossible to relate or identify anywhere. No sir, people are simple and speak in simple terms, with very simple motivations. You don't think it too deeply. Life is fun and fascinating and simple. We're vulgar, we have a vocabulary of like 10 words and say the cringiest sh like there's no tomorrow. We don't have none of those word structures and gramerz.
And so the guy that writes random stuff after getting home for work nails down the most real story ever, because he lives it himself. Libraries and a small circle of intellectuals don't get you that. You have to get out of there to know humanity.
They nail it: Teenagers do indeed fall for the pretty girl with similar hobbies (second part optional) in 10s flat. People do dream to be kings or go on adventures for no other reason than to have some fun. Couples fight, kids get bullied, overblown drama takes place, for no reason whatsoever. And from there you go wherever, with no deep plans, with a simple backstory (if any at all relevant), and succeed for no apparent reason except for "luck and effort ig" - just like real human life.
Tolkien nailed it despite being a genius though, but for that one it'll take a long ahh review from me. Maybe another time.
It's a good book
At this point I'm taking notes on how to burn from neuro sensai
I mean it's a good book
Wait whats the font of the subtitles?
I know vedal doesn't have an english sub, so you edited it in.
Just curious
It's called first coffee 👌
The book of neuro? When?
"I never read a good book in my life."
"I read Harry Potter and Stephen King."
Well, that's a short answer to his opinion on these books.
NicE
1984 is overrated, if you decide to read it just don't expect too much from it.
-_-
Lol, yeah. Tbh, I agreed w/ Huxley that Brave New World was better. I even enjoyed Animal Farm more than 1984.
I mean, it’s not terrible, but it’s just kinda… meh.
It's not about the "quality", it's about the philosophy. *Literally everything this book describes is happening in real life today.*
Information online can be edited any day, media push the governments will and wishes, certain entities are publicly trashed and the population is encouraged to trash them too (the minute of hate!).
Doublethink is extremely present in corporate speeches. Politicians and businessmen give speeches filled with contradictions. Most recent example is Ubisoft and their "apology" for Assassin's Creed:Shadow.
And Newspeak? the language built to cancel any negative opinion? Does it ring any bell? It should, given how any negative backlash for any big movie or game is widely claimed to be review bombing. UA-cam hiding dislikes goes that way too, and political correctness as a whole is about erasing any word considered bad.
Orwell is the wisest man ever.
@@Dante02d12 Of course the philosophy is great. I liked that part. I’m not hating on Orwell. I mean that excluding the philosophy it’s mediocre. I know the philosophy is the main point anyways, but… well. The thing is, I like thinking about these things already, so I think of 1984 more as a treatise, and I’m sure many people do too. As a fiction book…Winston is boring, Julia is boring, and I couldn’t care less for either of their individual stories. That’s just my opinion. Most people in this comments section will be used to whatever trashy YA dystopian fiction they can find, stuff that turns their brains off and requires no critical thinking. They want some epic romance, not a story about hopelessness, totalitarianism, and surveillance. In that case, it wouldn’t be the book for them. It’s decent for someone who wants to think about its messages, and overrated for everyone else.
@@Dante02d12 (I still prefer Brave New World, though. Sorry, not sorry…)
Depends on what you find interesting really. I have seen people enjoy the strangest things.
Anyway, 1984 is basically a nom-fiction book at this point. It's like if someone wrote WW2 but swapped around the countries and names.
If you didn't read 1984 in school then I feel sorry for your school district. I'd argue it's more important than ever since social media has empowered cancel culture.
That's not what 1984 is about
@@bored_person I think OP is reffering to the way children are told to denounce their parents whenever they see them commit a "crime". Since the government decides what is a crime and what isn't, it looks like cancel culture, in the sense that people are arbitrarily convicted.
Anyway, the book is still the most essential to read in life.
@@Dante02d12 that's a massive stretch.
@@bored_person It's a public tribunal in both cases.
@@Dante02d12 nothing you are saying makes any sense