@@magicworld3242 He had photos of the damages. That's not ZERO evidence. The defendant tried to fool her with that trash paper so she rightfully believed that he is shady and tries to get away with something he actually did. The actions of the defenant were more than enough to rule the way she did. It's not a criminal case for having a ruling beyond doubt and based only on evidence.
Add to ur comment for this show, this is umpteenth episode where the person who actually was involved in the theft/accusation/business transaction DOES NOT APPEAR in court & instead the defendant is someone who wasn't there AT ALL in the room nor made any contact with plaintiff😮
Plaintiff keeps reaching in his pocket for something only to pull out BS , and the moving company sends out a lackey with a piece of paper that says yeah this is a contract. Judge should have tossed them both out of court.
this same judge that says grab a roll of toilet paper and a crayon and bring it to court is now telling the defendant that a printed contract on good paper is not good enough . she would often contradict herself .
@@TheBanwait8 she only said make a receipt , but never mentions signatures , so he still did what she always claims she wants and then she still does not accept it .
@@marleonetti7signatures are the point of making a contract. Even with crayon and tp😊. It is a recorded agreement between peeps. Without signatures it is just tp and crayon. Plus, she never accepts “typed up for court” evidence, only original documents
"I can't get a new expresso machine." Why would you? You never used the one you had for 11 years. Some people just don't understand that they can't get a brand-new item to replace a broken one that's over a decade old, used or not.
@@The_Real_Mier , It wasn't up to the defendant to present a copy of the contract. The plaintiff was the one suing, it's up to him to prove his case. The plaintiff had (ZERO) evidence. JM just wanted to let the plaintiff win.
Anyone else notice that the plaintiff said that the espresso machine was "never used," (first he said rarely, then never), and it is 11 years old? If he hasn't used it in 11 years, why replace it? And if you just have to replace it, why on earth would you get one for over $500 if you never use the thing?!?! If you have something (that you didn't even purchase) taking up space for over a decade that you never use, and you get ANY money for it once it's broken, you AREN'T going to spend the money you got to buy a replacement so that it can take up space for the next decade.
They probably needed a driver with the truck so that it wouldn't get ticketed/had to be moved. Probably a move in a city where you can't just leave the truck sitting there, unattended.
Wow! No evidence needed and still was awarded $500 ... I thought when something is damaged during a move if they didn't purchase additional insurance the reimbursement is limited to so many cents per pound??? This was a terrible ruling
When there is no proof the judge will state that whoever she believes the most is who she will be rewarding the case to basically I thought that we would know this by now since this is not the first case that just happened in the most of the time when you don't have no evidence you have to go with it when I say you want me to judge has to go with what they believe in most who has a more believable story
Judge Judy would have asked the plaintiff why he was there wasting her time?! He brought nothing and proved nothing. He also got caught up in his own lie. I wasn't convinced, not even a little bit.
I just had bed bugs a couple months ago and it was God awful and I didn’t know I had it at first I thought I was scratching because I had flies or something but my dog wasn’t scratching so I was confused. These blood sucking critters bit the hell out of me. I still have all the marks they really messed me up. I didn’t know what it was until I put all white linen on my bed and I finally see the little blood suckers. I’m so happy they finally all Gone. I wouldn’t want to wish this on anyone but my enemies lol 😂
He said he never really used the machine,Then he said, he got it as a gift eleven years ago. But, bias, bigoted, racist JM still gave him money for it.
@@magicworld3242Your dementia is showing its symptoms all over this comment section. Next time, take a Post-it note, write: “I already made this comment” and stick it on your screen! That way you don’t have to write the same thing over and over again!
This is the worst thing you can do if you have bed bugs. Do NOT pack up your junk and move it to storage while your home is being treated! The bugs and their eggs are in your furniture and everything else you own and you will just be bringing them back when you move it all back in. A bed bug can live in a dormant state without feeding for up to a year!
Next time, bring the repair estimate for the expensive espresso machine. They could have tossed stuff around, not caring if there was damage or if they lost something...
Absent a signed contract with terms, the judge used the law combined with professional education, experience, and discernment to make a judgement in the case. Not a “crush,” as the person received less than 1/3 of their ask.
JM was acting like she had a school girl crush on the plaintiff. She seems like the type of woman that will be married and have an affair, behind her husband's back.
@@magicworld3242Honey… I don’t want to alarm you, but you should get to a doctor as soon as possible…. Because there is definitely something very wrong with your brain!
Oh my! Both of these litigants are extremely clueless!! Plaintiff-I don’t know how they do it in Italy, but here, you must have proof of things you want to be reimbursed for! (Well in most cases), he seemed kind of shocked he didn’t receive full value for an 11-yr. old espresso machine! Lol!!! Really?!! Defendant-“I didn’t know we would have to pay for his stuff (that got lost or damaged??!!”) - seriously?? Maybe he just started working there or just doesn’t understand how it works when people pay moving companies lots of $$$ to (sometimes pack too) to move their belongings, um, yeah, they are responsible for making sure everything on the inventory sheet arrives at the destination the way it was packed!! Good moving companies ($$$) are meticulous in their packing & moving abilities. Once in awhile something might get damaged & when that happens their contract should state they are responsible for everything arriving in good condition. Anything that arrives broken or not at all (lost or stolen) of course is still their responsibility!! Lol!! (Ugh, where do they find these litigants??) 😂
Bad judge bad! Neither one had a leg to stand on, no evidence. Why did they send the driver? The plaintiff had nothing. Should have thrown them both out. What's up with the judge? This is not the first time she has made a crappy call IMHO. Starting to lose faith in her after judgements like this one. Wonder if she ever reads any of these comments? Probably not!
this same judge that says grab a roll of toilet paper and a crayon and bring it to court is now telling the defendant that a printed contract on good paper is not good enough . she would often contradict herself .
I can't believe Milian called it an "expresso machine" while talking to an Italian. And, looks like she didn't do too well in Italian class either, since she can't pronounce the guy's name.
The defendant was sent exactly because he didn't know anything, and sent with a nonsense piece of paper. I am surprised that JM didn't mention that he was given proxy to speak for the company, he seemed to not care all that much.
Is it me or the more plaintiff speaks the more shady he becomes 🧐 and the fact he was looking for that non existent contract he knew he didn’t have and couldn’t fit in such a tight suit😂 , the fact he brought nada, zero evidence as JM put it is choking he got any money at all, but a lesson for all is even though plaintiff had the burden of proof it never hurts anyone to bring proof of what you are being accused , like Harvey said, before and after pics and uhmm yeah the contract plaintiff signed saying all was there when he got his things back.
i dont understand these verdicts . plaintiff had zero proof that the movers damaged anything . if i was a hard working mover i would be pissed at these judges who make easy money .
i feel like she just liked the plaintiff on a personal level but he had zero proof that the defendants were responsible for his old espresso machine not working and his old trunk having some damage . both those items were old enough to have plenty of damage before the move even happened .
Judge Milian is NO FOOL. Don't try to mess with her by giving her a type written paper & NOT a real legal contract without any signatures. Just because she's a female, doesn't make her a fool. She's NO fool!
in NY they recommended that if you went to a hotel, you put your suitcases in the bathtub. You were supposed to keep all your things in the tub. In our city in Canada, we had trouble with the main branch of our library.....ppl who sat on a padded bench there were taking home bedbugs.
if i was a mover , i would tell people that they would have to purchase their own moving insurance to cover any damaged items . i hate when people expect movers to handle all of their precious junk with kid gloves . u hired movers , not surgeons .
The plaintiff was lying. 1st he said water was leaking from the machine. Then he said, he never really used it. Then he said, he got it as a wedding gift 11 years ago. The plaintiff had (ZERO) evidence, Yet the judge still gave him money. She's bias,bigoted and racist.
I'd like a coffee maker machine one of those nifty ones with the pods those retro looking ones . I really want a pink Smeg toaster and kettle those 1940s looking ones 🩷 I'm going to get them for my kitchen !!!
this same judge that says grab a roll of toilet paper and a crayon and bring it to court is now telling the defendant that a printed contract on good paper is not good enough . she would often contradict herself .
Dear Judge Milian. I love your show, and I am a HUGE fan of People's Court. With all due respect, every time I heard you say "Expresso" I cringed. LOL. I know you care about pronouncing foreign words correctly, so I thought I would just point out that the word is "Espresso" - No "x". :)
two things….. @ 9:43 the judge said the Indonesian trunk got wacked. you can’t say wacked with an italian in the room. lol plus, an italian that doesn’t bring a contract. we always have contracts, that’s how we stay in business, you know what i’m say’n heyyyy ohhhhh the other thing….the defendant looks EXACTLY like Eddy Murphy WOW he could be he’s twin.
She’s so bias how you gonna yell at the defendant for no contract even though he’s a assistant but not the plaintiff who kept reaching in his pocket for 0 evidence
Exactly, For years people have said JM is a bit of a racist. The plaintiff couldn't prove his case, because he had ZERO evidence. But, she still ruled in his favor and gave him money 🤦
@@Mrssmith0814 , And remember he said, he never really used the machine, Then he said, he got it as a gift (eleven years ago). But, bias, bigoted, racist JM still gave him money for it.
Plaintiff is a strait POSER. One of those guys who walk around like they have it all but don't have nada. He wouldn't be suing over a few hundred bucks lol
How do you come to court with zero evidence? That blows my mind.
They want tv time
@@magicworld3242 He had photos of the damages. That's not ZERO evidence. The defendant tried to fool her with that trash paper so she rightfully believed that he is shady and tries to get away with something he actually did. The actions of the defenant were more than enough to rule the way she did. It's not a criminal case for having a ruling beyond doubt and based only on evidence.
The contract says "Moving Contract" at the top. It should have (not fake) underneath it like most contracts do.
Unless there's video footage, no one knows for certain if someone stole something
Add to ur comment for this show, this is umpteenth episode where the person who actually was involved in the theft/accusation/business transaction DOES NOT APPEAR in court & instead the defendant is someone who wasn't there AT ALL in the room nor made any contact with plaintiff😮
Plaintiff keeps reaching in his pocket for something only to pull out BS , and the moving company sends out a lackey with a piece of paper that says yeah this is a contract. Judge should have tossed them both out of court.
😂😂😂😂 I like that, imma have to take that one
this same judge that says grab a roll of toilet paper and a crayon and bring it to court is now telling the defendant that a printed contract on good paper is not good enough . she would often contradict herself .
@@marleonetti7 there was nothing signed on that piece of papaer the defendant had.
@@TheBanwait8 she only said make a receipt , but never mentions signatures , so he still did what she always claims she wants and then she still does not accept it .
@@marleonetti7signatures are the point of making a contract. Even with crayon and tp😊. It is a recorded agreement between peeps. Without signatures it is just tp and crayon.
Plus, she never accepts “typed up for court” evidence, only original documents
"I can't get a new expresso machine." Why would you? You never used the one you had for 11 years. Some people just don't understand that they can't get a brand-new item to replace a broken one that's over a decade old, used or not.
Bruh im moving yo shit cause ypu got bugs...why would i take something 😂
😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
I'm saying 😂😂😂😂😂
For being so accurate, it's not "expresso" it's espresso
Again, why do you even bother to go to court, without proof, invoices etc.????🤔
The plaintiff had the burden of proof, yet she's yelling at the defendant for not bringing the contract.
🤔 Go figure😔
No, for first trying to pass of that trashy piece of paper as IF it was the contract!
@@The_Real_Mier , It wasn't up to the defendant to present a copy of the contract. The plaintiff was the one suing, it's up to him to prove his case. The plaintiff had (ZERO) evidence. JM just wanted to let the plaintiff win.
@@magicworld3242 JM asked the defendant for the contract, and yet he insulted her intelligence by passing that paper off as their company contract.
@@latricebrown7942 I think it was the defendants insistence that the paper he knew wasn't the contract, was the contract.
It was the digging in the pockets for me 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Doug: “Keep your clothes on and go” 😂😂😂
Anyone else notice that the plaintiff said that the espresso machine was "never used," (first he said rarely, then never), and it is 11 years old? If he hasn't used it in 11 years, why replace it? And if you just have to replace it, why on earth would you get one for over $500 if you never use the thing?!?! If you have something (that you didn't even purchase) taking up space for over a decade that you never use, and you get ANY money for it once it's broken, you AREN'T going to spend the money you got to buy a replacement so that it can take up space for the next decade.
Yes! I definitely noticed that he said Never used! Then complaining to Doug that it’s only 3/4 of a coffee machine like he was gonna use it!!
It’s just like people selling things on craigslist always say…
“It was gently used in a vacation home” 😂
Great points! I can't believe he was awarded anything.
When the guy said he sit in the truck and did not help, I thought what the hell, what kind of moving company is that
They probably needed a driver with the truck so that it wouldn't get ticketed/had to be moved. Probably a move in a city where you can't just leave the truck sitting there, unattended.
I liked the Plaintiff's friend 😅
Doug is an icon , he’s hallway comments are ICONIC 😂
The owners set that man up to be embarrassed
Psst - if anyone ever says can I store things at your place since I have bed bugs, tell them no.
@Renee Terry-Newman 😂😂😂
Wow! No evidence needed and still was awarded $500 ...
I thought when something is damaged during a move if they didn't purchase additional insurance the reimbursement is limited to so many cents per pound???
This was a terrible ruling
She can’t enforce limitations and terms from a contract that doesn’t exist, so she used her best judgement.
The dude just sues someone with no EVIDENCE and gets 500.00 dollars?
EXACTLY!!!
Judge milian is a racist pos
When there is no proof the judge will state that whoever she believes the most is who she will be rewarding the case to basically I thought that we would know this by now since this is not the first case that just happened in the most of the time when you don't have no evidence you have to go with it when I say you want me to judge has to go with what they believe in most who has a more believable story
Exactly!!! Makes no sense
Bias
How do you think your company is not liable for breaking his items?
NO EVIDENCE/NO PROOF
Judge Judy would have asked the plaintiff why he was there wasting her time?! He brought nothing and proved nothing. He also got caught up in his own lie. I wasn't convinced, not even a little bit.
Plaintiff charmed the judge, was a wrap from there. I like Judge Milian but she sometimes gets on my nerves!!
These are addictive, im on my 4th ep nonstop.
No estimates whether his friend came or not he wouldn’t know the value of any of those items unless he made any of those items for a living.
$700 espresso machine is NOT EXPENSIVE.
Why do they even bother showing cases where neither the plaintiff nor the defendant come with any evidence whatsoever?...
Plaintiff: 🤷🏻♂️
Defendant: 🤷🏿♂️
JM: 🙅🏽♀️
I just had bed bugs a couple months ago and it was God awful and I didn’t know I had it at first I thought I was scratching because I had flies or something but my dog wasn’t scratching so I was confused. These blood sucking critters bit the hell out of me. I still have all the marks they really messed me up. I didn’t know what it was until I put all white linen on my bed and I finally see the little blood suckers. I’m so happy they finally all Gone. I wouldn’t want to wish this on anyone but my enemies lol 😂
Both parties were *SO unprepared!*
If the expresso machine was never used how did he know it even worked before the move.
and he said that at the end. I don't think this was a good ruling.
He said he never really used the machine,Then he said, he got it as a gift eleven years ago. But, bias, bigoted, racist JM still gave him money for it.
Milian keeps saying Expresso machine
@@magicworld3242Your dementia is showing its symptoms all over this comment section.
Next time, take a Post-it note, write: “I already made this comment” and stick it on your screen!
That way you don’t have to write the same thing over and over again!
@@magicworld3242 Enough already! 2 of her daughters have a black godmothers !
This is the worst thing you can do if you have bed bugs. Do NOT pack up your junk and move it to storage while your home is being treated! The bugs and their eggs are in your furniture and everything else you own and you will just be bringing them back when you move it all back in. A bed bug can live in a dormant state without feeding for up to a year!
Plaintiffs walked in straight out of a GQ catalog
Next time, bring the repair estimate for the expensive espresso machine. They could have tossed stuff around, not caring if there was damage or if they lost something...
They had No proof they broke anything. So why are they getting a dime. Judge Milan again with her selective ruling.
Why is she saying expresso??? I'm stunned, she should know better. Next she's going to axe a question.
The Judge clearly had a crush on the plaintiff...Zero evidence, yet he won. Zero evidence and yelling at the defendant. That was strange.
Absent a signed contract with terms, the judge used the law combined with professional education, experience, and discernment to make a judgement in the case. Not a “crush,” as the person received less than 1/3 of their ask.
And seemingly racist 🤔❤️🖤💚
If you good looking and smile for her, she rules for you! She rules with emotions which is craaaazzzy
JM was acting like she had a school girl crush on the plaintiff. She seems like the type of woman that will be married and have an affair, behind her husband's back.
You and Magic World should get a new hobby because you stink at reading women. She was as professional as any male judge.
@@magicworld3242Honey… I don’t want to alarm you, but you should get to a doctor as soon as possible…. Because there is definitely something very wrong with your brain!
That's definitely the way it seemed in this case SMH
I was thinking the same thing! 😂
the plaintiff should've done more research on this moving company before hiring them, probably could've avoided all of this nonsense
I don't think it was the moving company
Before I even pressed play, why did i know that the black guy was going to lose.....?
Not shocked the plaintiff had zero evidence and STILL WON!!!
💯
Oh my! Both of these litigants are extremely clueless!! Plaintiff-I don’t know how they do it in Italy, but here, you must have proof of things you want to be reimbursed for! (Well in most cases), he seemed kind of shocked he didn’t receive full value for an 11-yr. old espresso machine! Lol!!! Really?!!
Defendant-“I didn’t know we would have to pay for his stuff (that got lost or damaged??!!”) -
seriously?? Maybe he just started working there or just doesn’t understand how it works when people pay moving companies lots of $$$ to (sometimes pack too) to move their belongings, um, yeah, they are responsible for making sure everything on the inventory sheet arrives at the destination the way it was packed!! Good moving companies ($$$) are meticulous in their packing & moving abilities. Once in awhile something might get damaged & when that happens their contract should state they are responsible for everything arriving in good condition. Anything that arrives broken or not at all (lost or stolen) of course is still their responsibility!! Lol!!
(Ugh, where do they find these litigants??) 😂
Bad judge bad! Neither one had a leg to stand on, no evidence. Why did they send the driver? The plaintiff had nothing. Should have thrown them both out. What's up with the judge? This is not the first time she has made a crappy call IMHO. Starting to lose faith in her after judgements like this one. Wonder if she ever reads any of these comments? Probably not!
Bed bugs must live in New York.
The moving company knew they would lose so why would anyone important spend time in court lets just send someone else and let them get embarrassed.
Does the defendant get to keep the espresso machine?
Right!! This case was bs
Wow I was surprised the plaintiff got anything with out proof
I have sticky fingers. Its an album by The Rolling Stones.
The judge was (once again) extremely bias here. The plaintiff had ZERO proof of anything. Ridiculous ruling
Plaintiff looks very sneaky and arrogant. That machine was probably already broken and the defendant was an easy scapegoat
this same judge that says grab a roll of toilet paper and a crayon and bring it to court is now telling the defendant that a printed contract on good paper is not good enough . she would often contradict herself .
I can't believe Milian called it an "expresso machine" while talking to an Italian. And, looks like she didn't do too well in Italian class either, since she can't pronounce the guy's name.
Cockroaches won't bite you and are easier to remove.
The plaintiff should have packed ALL the boxes …. AND BROUGHT THE CONTRACT
The defendant was sent exactly because he didn't know anything, and sent with a nonsense piece of paper. I am surprised that JM didn't mention that he was given proxy to speak for the company, he seemed to not care all that much.
What a great friend the plaintiff has 😂
LeFt iT iN tHe OfFiCe
Is it me or the more plaintiff speaks the more shady he becomes 🧐 and the fact he was looking for that non existent contract he knew he didn’t have and couldn’t fit in such a tight suit😂 , the fact he brought nada, zero evidence as JM put it is choking he got any money at all, but a lesson for all is even though plaintiff had the burden of proof it never hurts anyone to bring proof of what you are being accused , like Harvey said, before and after pics and uhmm yeah the contract plaintiff signed saying all was there when he got his things back.
Phillipe is the best, hes hilarious
Espresso, Judge, not expresso.
plaintiff intrigues me. I'm italian and he belongs in the movies, I wouldn't cross him lol
BRING EVIDENCE PEOPLE!!!😮💨
Plaintiff is a cornball. The fake reach for the jacket inside pocket was so annoying. He shows traits of obnoxiousness.
I'd like to have a Manhattan with the judge
i dont understand these verdicts . plaintiff had zero proof that the movers damaged anything . if i was a hard working mover i would be pissed at these judges who make easy money .
They wrong for sending the driver?!
You’ll never receive the amount you think your items are worth. It’s always market value, never the value you place on them. Sentimental or not.
Who has sticky fingers? Maybe the plaintiff sold it like some people in suits do🤔❤️🖤💚
Hmmm this was a weird case. The contract wasn't even emailed?
$500 for an old machine and no estimate for repair? Bad call but still love JM
i feel like she just liked the plaintiff on a personal level but he had zero proof that the defendants were responsible for his old espresso machine not working and his old trunk having some damage . both those items were old enough to have plenty of damage before the move even happened .
Judge Milian is NO FOOL. Don't try to mess with her by giving her a type written paper & NOT a real legal contract without any signatures. Just because she's a female, doesn't make her a fool. She's NO fool!
Bad ruling. He didn't prove ANYTHING in this case.
in NY they recommended that if you went to a hotel, you put your suitcases in the bathtub. You were supposed to keep all your things in the tub. In our city in Canada, we had trouble with the main branch of our library.....ppl who sat on a padded bench there were taking home bedbugs.
Yikes
The plaintiff doesn't look like he is hurting for money.
what he was hurting for was proof but somehow he won . i feel like the judge just liked him on a personal level .
if i was a mover , i would tell people that they would have to purchase their own moving insurance to cover any damaged items . i hate when people expect movers to handle all of their precious junk with kid gloves . u hired movers , not surgeons .
being that he has a suit and tie on you would think he has all the proof and is ready to win but NO he was the total opposite 😂
He only had his good looks. 😅😅😅
This verdict was unfair. The two parties did not have contracts in court. This is a bias judgement.
368th from Montréal Canada. The plaintiff can bring the espresso ☕️ machine to Montréal’s little Italy the part can be replaced
The plaintiff was lying. 1st he said water was leaking from the machine. Then he said, he never really used it. Then he said, he got it as a wedding gift 11 years ago. The plaintiff had (ZERO) evidence, Yet the judge still gave him money. She's bias,bigoted and racist.
Now he is saying that he didn't think they had to pay for anything to Harvey but couldn't say so in the court room
Don't agree with this ruling at all
sorry pack your own stuff
There's no x in espresso.
Bedbugs count me out I would leave everything in the house nothing matters anymore when you have beg-bugs . They are crazzzzy
I'd like a coffee maker machine one of those nifty ones with the pods those retro looking ones . I really want a pink Smeg toaster and kettle those 1940s looking ones 🩷 I'm going to get them for my kitchen !!!
Ha!😂
I'll take a Bunn coffee maker please.
And a hug...😉
It kills me that people go to court without a contract ,proof or forgot the paperwork and they all want money! lol!
So when did espresso become EX presso? I didn't get the memo.
this same judge that says grab a roll of toilet paper and a crayon and bring it to court is now telling the defendant that a printed contract on good paper is not good enough . she would often contradict herself .
no she doesnt
You don’t have to clear the house to rid bed bugs. The bugs are in the furniture. These Bug companies want all the Money-
Dear Judge Milian. I love your show, and I am a HUGE fan of People's Court. With all due respect, every time I heard you say "Expresso" I cringed. LOL. I know you care about pronouncing foreign words correctly, so I thought I would just point out that the word is "Espresso" - No "x". :)
two things…..
@ 9:43 the judge said the Indonesian trunk got wacked.
you can’t say wacked with an italian in the room. lol
plus, an italian that doesn’t bring a contract. we always have contracts, that’s how we stay in business, you know what i’m say’n
heyyyy ohhhhh
the other thing….the defendant looks EXACTLY like Eddy Murphy WOW
he could be he’s twin.
would of given him nothing
Friend Philippo, love him. I went naked lol
Doug! 🤣 "Keep your clothes on and go!"
That was the guy the defendant sent to court, and stuff like dat?
The Defendant didn't do a good job of defending his company he didn't denied breaking the Espresso machine he just stood there and looked dumb
Because it was already confirmed that he did not help with the moving process. You have to go back and listen.
This ruling sucks both the plaintiff and defendant didn't have no proof it should've been a even split a toss out
i hate when people expect movers to handle all of their precious junk with kid gloves . u hired movers , not surgeons .
She’s so bias how you gonna yell at the defendant for no contract even though he’s a assistant but not the plaintiff who kept reaching in his pocket for 0 evidence
Exactly, For years people have said JM is a bit of a racist. The plaintiff couldn't prove his case, because he had ZERO evidence. But, she still ruled in his favor and gave him money 🤦
@@magicworld3242 Why would the case have anything to do with his race? It doesn't make any sense, stop reaching; yikes.
@@magicworld3242 What proof do you have that she’s racist? Everything is not about race.
I'm beginning to think JM is a bit of a racist. The plaintiff literally had (NO) evidence of anything, and she still ruled in his favor.
And then she starts to yell for NO REASON.
And who’s to say if that machine was broken before it was moved.
@@Mrssmith0814 , And remember he said, he never really used the machine, Then he said, he got it as a gift (eleven years ago). But, bias, bigoted, racist JM still gave him money for it.
Exactly!
R u adrian prince
Plaintiff is a strait POSER. One of those guys who walk around like they have it all but don't have nada. He wouldn't be suing over a few hundred bucks lol
Does anyone else think the defendant looks like Dave Chappelle?
The plaintive looks like a younger sexier, Robert De Niro🥰🥰🔥🔥👏🏾👏🏾
The plaintiff is soo arrogant
ESPRESSO
NOT EXPRESSI 🙄
Wow that plaintiff didn't even proof anything but still won money.
The plaintiff is an Italian cousin of the actor Alec Baldwin
Her pronouncing espresso as “expresso” is driving me fucking crazy
Go to court without a contract, completely empty handed ? Losers