Why So Many Nations Want New K9 Thunder Howitzer?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 397

  • @Military-TV
    @Military-TV  2 роки тому +18

    ua-cam.com/video/J7pZYGtFaB8/v-deo.html ► Why The 2S7M Malka Superheavy Self Propelled Is Most Feared

    • @orkako
      @orkako 2 роки тому +1

      It's not scary at all. It's form over substance. As practical as German giant railroad guns.

    • @Joshua-lt7tk
      @Joshua-lt7tk 2 роки тому

      Ii keeping o

  • @terryfreeman1018
    @terryfreeman1018 2 роки тому +347

    Korea has grown in to a powerhouse. I was stationed there in '85. I miss Korea.

    • @버프코트
      @버프코트 2 роки тому +4

      @@김선우-s7r6i 85년이라고요.

    • @AndrewJeon
      @AndrewJeon 2 роки тому +53

      Thank you for your service, sir.

    • @로미오-s2p
      @로미오-s2p 2 роки тому +25

      Thank you for cherishing and loving Korea
      I hope you are always healthy

    • @samkim9057
      @samkim9057 2 роки тому +15

      It's time for a visit!

    • @tesla3388
      @tesla3388 2 роки тому +20

      Thank you for your service. Next time plz visit anytime for travel. Proud of you ❤️👍🏻

  • @busyhoneybee4517
    @busyhoneybee4517 Рік тому +34

    King of Howitzers.

  • @adisura9904
    @adisura9904 2 роки тому +193

    India recently bought these under the name K9 Vajra. About a 100 are in service and further 200 more are planned to be ordered. They are being made locally in India with some India specific upgrades.

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 2 роки тому +29

      Australia is doing the same and building them in Australia too.

    • @Gautham9125
      @Gautham9125 2 роки тому +32

      K9 Vajra basically means Thunder in sankirit. Like the K9 Thunder.

    • @kiabtoomlauj6249
      @kiabtoomlauj6249 2 роки тому +29

      Poland has already ordered 1,000. The first 100 or so are shipped from South Korea, while the rest are to be built in Poland, a joint venture between Poland and South Korea, so the units will more naturally fit Poland's specific needs. Poland also ordered American Abrams, but due to the limited supply and less willing to share technologies, by the Americans, Poland opted to diversify its top end military purchases.
      Also, from South Korea, Poland is likely buying the K239 (HIMARS made in South Korea, consulted with the Americans and companies involved in the buiding of HIMARS). Plus air force training planes. Point is, South Korea has not built itself into a global top end military powerhouse... with most of its most advanced weapons systems being compatible with NATO countries own weapons,

    • @tin-n-tan
      @tin-n-tan 2 роки тому +7

      ​@@kiabtoomlauj6249 Poland also wants more of a defensive force so these are sort of more useful than the Abrams. stand off and demolish attackers.

    • @patrioticsammy6454
      @patrioticsammy6454 2 роки тому +2

      the thumbnail is also from India also

  • @jeffstrong4580
    @jeffstrong4580 2 роки тому +167

    S Korea has the largest modern artillery units in the world with 1040 K55, 1200 K9 and 850 K105A1 supported by 58 M270, 367 K239 and K136 MRL. S Korean army also has about 5,000 105/155mm towed artillery and 6,000 60/81/107/120mm mortars stocked with somewhere around 12-15 million rounds.

    • @kiabtoomlauj6249
      @kiabtoomlauj6249 2 роки тому

      When you're living with nice neighbors like Putin and Kim, who could wine and dine with you on caviar one day, all smiling big fake smiles.... and bombard you the next day with high velocity shells & missiles, you have to be ready, with lots of options...
      Ukraine's problem was that even after Russia forcibly took Crimea, 2014, it didn't believe --- up until the last hour of the actual invasion --- that Russia was going to invade and try to decapitate Zelensky's Jewish "Nazi" government... and install a puppet who would just read a few lines from the teleprompter, written by Putin, about how they're both Slavic people and there's no need to join evil, aggressive NATO, the EU, etc.

    • @swarnamohanty3121
      @swarnamohanty3121 2 роки тому +1

      What's the use, it's only enemy N. Korea talks with Atom bomb.

    • @dingchavez1960
      @dingchavez1960 2 роки тому +29

      That's a lot of firepower.

    • @Chaffchaffe
      @Chaffchaffe 2 роки тому +21

      Because of north korea

    • @lukluke2461
      @lukluke2461 2 роки тому +6

      somehow has a bizzarly powerful army forces despite being a penisula nation...

  • @muneirovalibas6194
    @muneirovalibas6194 2 роки тому +52

    I remembered in the early 2000s Nkorea launched a sudden short bombardment of a Skorean border town. Reports that I heard that the K9s immediately responded as counter-battery.
    The NKoreans suspended almost just as quickly, with reports saying the K9s precision and SKorean obviously superior radar inflicting heavy casualties on the norther side.

    • @Chaffchaffe
      @Chaffchaffe 2 роки тому +10

      음흉한 북한은 K9의 훈련사격이 끝나기를 기다렸다가 도발을 시작했다. K9의 탄이 모자라서 직접 옮겼음에도 상당히 빠르게 반격했고 대포병 레이더가 없었음에도 그 당시 사진을 보면 알수있지만 괜찮은 탄착군을 형성했다.

    • @putcheeseonit
      @putcheeseonit Рік тому +1

      I believe this is the bombardement of Yeonpyeong?

  • @MohammadAdliadlious
    @MohammadAdliadlious 2 роки тому +45

    Egypt recently got a license to manufacture the K9 thunder, very impressive artillery system.

  • @michael7324
    @michael7324 2 роки тому +47

    Im amazed at the reload vehicle frankly

  • @GoogIe_UK
    @GoogIe_UK Рік тому +47

    World-class performance
    Nearly half the price of the competition
    5x faster production capacity than the competition
    Proven reliable in cold frozen Finland
    and hot desert Egypt
    Still haven't bought?

    • @zdravkodomic5029
      @zdravkodomic5029 4 місяці тому

      It's not as good as western equipment though. Also we should always prefer European production.

    • @ABCDE-i9e
      @ABCDE-i9e 4 місяці тому +2

      ​@@zdravkodomic5029 2x expensive and 5x slow producing European ones? lol

  • @UltimateTruthChannel
    @UltimateTruthChannel 6 місяців тому +6

    Korean here. Our winters are Siberian cold. Our summers are Vietnam hot and wet. We can survive anywhere in the world. So can our weapons. Always built with extreme four seasons in mind.

  • @garrykim5220
    @garrykim5220 2 роки тому +48

    Maximum firing range 18 km (M107, HE)
    30 km (M549A1, RAP/HE)
    36 km (K310, BB/DP-ICM)
    40 km (K307, BB/HE)
    54 km (K315, BB+RAP/HE)

    • @sabrehohoho7681
      @sabrehohoho7681 2 роки тому +3

      You must be in the service or an ex-army/gunner. Did you, bro?

    • @유튜브_YT-g9k
      @유튜브_YT-g9k Рік тому +11

      ​@@sabrehohoho7681 All Korean men go to the army 😅😅

    • @2serveand2protect
      @2serveand2protect Рік тому +3

      @@유튜브_YT-g9k GOOD! That is one the main reason why they grow into excellent, and productive citizens.

    • @kittycatcat6962
      @kittycatcat6962 Рік тому +2

      Keeeeewl.... Base bleed is fun

    • @유튜브_YT-g9k
      @유튜브_YT-g9k Рік тому +1

      ​@@2serveand2protect is this correct? 😢😢

  • @donghwankim2401
    @donghwankim2401 8 місяців тому +9

    With the exception of Germany and France, all countries prefer K9s. From this, it can be inferred that there is not much difference between the quality and price of self-propelled guns in European countries.
    If you want to play tanks, it is appropriate to buy German tanks, but if you want to win a war, you should buy Korean weapons.

  • @divinewind6313
    @divinewind6313 2 роки тому +84

    South Korea also doesn’t involve themselves in the politics of the customer nation. One of the key reasons why India went for this machine.

    • @MyH3ntaiGirl
      @MyH3ntaiGirl 2 роки тому +1

      Yep
      Us Vietnamese are relying mostly on Russian stuff due to how cheap it is compared to anything in the West
      But with Russia more and more fked, China can now actually force Russia inti doing what they wanted
      Imagine they telling Russia, Vietnam is our enemy who we are currently invading.....stop giving them stuff
      Then......we fked

    • @jamiek1714
      @jamiek1714 Рік тому +4

      Interesting point.

    • @justicewbs
      @justicewbs Рік тому +6

      The K9 self-propelled Howitzers are serving India well in your border conflict with China

    • @kakaungranduomo2666
      @kakaungranduomo2666 Рік тому +6

      Among the idiomatic expressions in Korea, there’s a saying,
      "Never be involved in others‘ house affair."
      Customer nation is literally just CUSTOMER.
      Give the goods and take money, that‘s it.
      Sellers don‘t need to know how or to whom customer gonna use the goods.
      None of their business.
      Such relationships are neat for each other.

    • @GungKrisna12
      @GungKrisna12 11 місяців тому +2

      So practically, no political strings attached

  • @arsevengumush3279
    @arsevengumush3279 Рік тому +8

    Turkey is producing a version of this artillery under licence. Currently they are trying local power unit with additional electronics to increased firing speed and range.

  • @amitbhau
    @amitbhau 2 роки тому +28

    L&T mnc company of India was also produced 100 k9 and delivered to Indian army, there is additional orders of 200 k9 in the pipeline

  • @Terry0129
    @Terry0129 Рік тому +27

    The k9 also has a time-on target system(TOT). This is to fire three shots at different angles and drop three shots at the same time.

    • @David-by4jf
      @David-by4jf 9 місяців тому +1

      영어쓰면서 외국인인척 하지 말자 진짜 없어보이니까 ㅋㅋ

    • @Terry0129
      @Terry0129 9 місяців тому

      @@David-by4jf 외국인인척은 안했고 외국에서 오래 살고있는데 시비거는 이유가 뭐냐? 없어보일것도 없고,,;; 뭐 어쩌라고. 영어쓰면 안되? 니한테 내가 피해줬냐 진짜 ㅈㅂ신같네

    • @David-by4jf
      @David-by4jf 9 місяців тому

      @@Terry0129 외국인인척 영어 써서 마치 외국인들이 댓글 다는 것처럼 보이게 하는게 없어보인다고 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

    • @David-by4jf
      @David-by4jf 9 місяців тому

      @@Terry0129 마치 외국인들도 좋아한다라는걸 보여주기 위해서 영어 쓰는거 진짜 없어보여 ㅎㅎ

    • @Terry0129
      @Terry0129 9 місяців тому +3

      @@David-by4jf 한국에서 나가본적이 없어서 잘 모를수도 있겠지만 나 구글 영국 계정이라 영국에서 달린 댓글이 더 먼저 떠 이 채널 한국껀지도 몰랐는데 왜 니가 쥐랄임? 뭐가 그렇게 불편함?

  • @BrianHSC
    @BrianHSC 2 роки тому +57

    Forgot one important feature. Fully air conditioned.

    • @claudebylion9932
      @claudebylion9932 Рік тому +4

      Yes, but has it got a tea boiler for UK???

    • @JohnDoe-mx6xh
      @JohnDoe-mx6xh Рік тому +5

      ​@@claudebylion9932 Turn off the A/C now everything boils 😂

  • @ttrruaminpn5755
    @ttrruaminpn5755 2 роки тому +36

    Wow that shot of field full of SPH blasting together would be hell for receiving end. That field full of guns are more than what many country has in their entire military and South Korea has 3000 of them. Jeez

  • @rustcohle349
    @rustcohle349 Рік тому +14

    Because Korea is one of the few countries in the arms market capable of building stuff in large numbers. Doesn't matter if western equivalents are better or not. They gutted their manufacturing abilities.

    • @bertnl530
      @bertnl530 9 місяців тому +6

      That is a very good reason. What does the best tank or howitzer or HIMARS or IFV brings, when you have to wait 6 years for it? It means you won't have it the next 6 years and when, then it is only the beginning. Before the full delivery is made, it may cost another 2 or 3 years, just because other customers want the same thing. I see nowadays Rheinmetall and BAE change their policy a little, wanting to build premises in other countries. Perhaps that has to do with the connections between Hanwha /Hyundai and Poland. Once a country chooses a particular system and it works well, then the competitors know they won't stand a chance with their systems in that country as long as they are not looking for newer or more. Also no revenues of aftersales or spare parts.
      Another thing is price policy. Army purchasers and fans of arms and ordnance can dream from the combination PZH 2000 and Exalibur shells. Reality however is that you will loose on persevance then. One can hit a target on 50 KM very precise , but for most targets it ain't neccesary. One can have the most expensive gun in the world, but then you miss money for ordnance and spares.

  • @kimj2570
    @kimj2570 2 роки тому +92

    Why many are buying K9s? Because Finns bought them first, and have been happy with them. Just used the option to full 96. We Finns are THE reference customer to have. Purchases are made tightly within budget. We buy only actually working weapon systems. Performance, price and supplier nation reliability within sphere of free world are our only criteria.

    • @0westdude
      @0westdude Рік тому +10

      Poland has a huge order for 672 k9 thunders most to be made in Poland along with k2 black Panthers

    • @dlev
      @dlev Рік тому +2

      @@0westdude I am told Poland is building the world’s largest army

    • @GeeHanShin
      @GeeHanShin Рік тому +4

      Because it's the best in the market atm

    • @jamesdakrn
      @jamesdakrn Рік тому +11

      Also- bc Korea gets cold aas balls in the winter, especially within the mountain ranges on the eastern side of the peninsula (some winter days its as cold as Siberia)
      And bc also in the summer it gets hot and humid, it’s proven to work in cold and hot weather

    • @kimj2570
      @kimj2570 Рік тому +8

      @@dlev If not biggest, atleast overwhelmingly superior land army in Europe. Like 2 to 3 times stronger than anyone else. Polish have clearly decided that they aint never again going to be occupied by foreign power. All their aid to Ukraine nonwithstanding, they clearly measure their rearmament on worst case scenario where they are the main frontier country. In coming years countries like Poland, and my home country Finland, which are among few who are determined to take care of their own defence whatever the cost, asking allied support as second tier option, deserve much larger say over countries that only hesitate, dont get much of anything done, like Germany. NATO is military alliance, and capabilities must count. Even more should count blatant abandoment of maintaining defensive capability (especially at times of good economy), utter disregard of even basic realities of geopolitics = Germany again. With Finland joining NATO our Baltic neighbours breath more easily. There is now friendly heavyweight land power on BOTH ends of Baltic sea. We can always get fighter bombers doing sorties within NATO. Getting troops and tracks on the ground is much harder.
      Finns would take any Russian attempt to attack/threaten our blood relatives and little brother, Estonia, especially seriously.

  • @davidwood2911
    @davidwood2911 Рік тому +8

    From David A. Wood: One should pay close attention when examining this admirably amazing, economic development. After the short, but brutally grinding Korean War (1950-1953), South Korea was a mortally depopulated, hugely damaged and mostly impoverished nation with very little heavy industry and only a meager amount of arable land, and as such, had to respectively import all of its military equipment and food supply from Western countries like the USA for decades. Now South Korea is not only the World's10th largest and thoroughly industrialized economy that is highly self-sufficient in supplying its national, nutrition needs, but the country is both comfortably affluent and extensively industrialized enough to do two things that are definite signs of an immensely wealthy and highly industrialized nation.That is, the South Koreans are alternately building home-made and first-rate military equipment for their vigilantly prepared and necessarily sizable armed forces on an appreciably large scale and actively selling the remainder, a lot of it, to friendly, foreign countries that are sufficiently able to pay for the South Korean-built, military equipment. This latter activity of bulk-sized, Military Arms Merchandising will eventually put fully-industrialized South Korea into direct competition with the hugely populated and monetarily wealthy country that is presently the World's No.#1 Arms Manufacturer/Arms Merchant, the USA, in the several years to come. Granted, it will be a long time from now, to be sure, but that time of the American Arms Industry having to ably compete with that of South Korea's is eventually going to come!

  • @Dryadlis
    @Dryadlis 2 роки тому +43

    Not only Britain is intrest in K9A2, the 212 K9A1 wich Poland just command will be modernise to this standard with an additional 440 K9A2.

    • @user-od1yi5iq1k
      @user-od1yi5iq1k 2 роки тому

      Poland says a lot of things.
      The real question is how they will afford all these new weapons?

    • @Dryadlis
      @Dryadlis 2 роки тому +1

      @@user-od1yi5iq1k No it s not this. It s who will operate this wapoen.

    • @user-od1yi5iq1k
      @user-od1yi5iq1k 2 роки тому +1

      @@Dryadlis Well, none of the major countries will, as they have their own domestic artillery systems.
      The greatest operator outside S. Korea is Turkey.

    • @Dryadlis
      @Dryadlis 2 роки тому +1

      @@user-od1yi5iq1k I m jusz saying that the biggest problem for Poland is the lak of personnel.

    • @user-od1yi5iq1k
      @user-od1yi5iq1k 2 роки тому +1

      @@Dryadlis But they are increasing the size of their army.
      This by itself will increase the portion of the defense budget spent on wages and thus decrease the amount available to purchase new equipment.

  • @deniz_0909
    @deniz_0909 2 роки тому +31

    turkey produced 460 t 155 storms under license ,and this year the new version of the storm 2 has started to enter the inventory and will most likely be produced until a total of 1000. Also, we used them actively in Syria, Iraq and Libya.

  • @cruzada07
    @cruzada07 2 роки тому +11

    It got thunder in it's name now feel the thunder

  • @Wüstenfuchs-x2b
    @Wüstenfuchs-x2b 8 місяців тому +2

    The world's strongest self-propelled Howitzer that continues to be upgraded

  • @mattdoespushups2350
    @mattdoespushups2350 2 роки тому +22

    Ok i was feeling just aight about it but that automatic ammo transfer was actually very good ...

  • @kingpetra6886
    @kingpetra6886 2 роки тому +35

    Definitely an improvement over the US 155mm howitzer.

    • @cstgraphpads2091
      @cstgraphpads2091 2 роки тому +5

      I mean, considering it's several decades younger than the US version, I would hope it's an improvement.

    • @yosmch
      @yosmch 2 роки тому +1

      Is it really better with only 30km range? I do hope that the war in Ukrain has shown that 30km artillery is not enough anymore with the introduction of MLRS and HIMARS

    • @kingpetra6886
      @kingpetra6886 2 роки тому +1

      @@yosmch At one time, it was 15km. Why do you 'hope' that that the war in the Ukraine is 'not enough'.

    • @whyno713
      @whyno713 2 роки тому +2

      @@yosmch Excalibur dude, problem has been solved and is in use currently...

    • @AbhishekSingh-zv2tn
      @AbhishekSingh-zv2tn 2 роки тому +2

      @@yosmch you are right also considering weight m777 is very effective but both are of different class now its time of guided rocket mbls.

  • @FINNSTIGAT0R
    @FINNSTIGAT0R Рік тому +6

    I see what you did there, you said "finished" while there was a photo of a Finnish Army's K9 on screen 😀

  • @진완-c9x
    @진완-c9x 2 роки тому +9

    k9 maximum range 54km(k315 shell)

  • @user-od1yi5iq1k
    @user-od1yi5iq1k 2 роки тому +74

    Two words: Price & performance.

  • @hyun-87
    @hyun-87 2 роки тому +9

    틀린 정보가 있습니다.
    연평도에서 전투를 치룬 것은 5사단이 아니라 해병대(MC) 입니다.
    5사단은 내륙에 위치한 철원에 있습니다.
    사망자는 병사 2명 민간인 2명입니다.

    • @loveaintfree1409
      @loveaintfree1409 Рік тому

      한국말로 하면 저 사람이 이해함 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

    • @hyun-87
      @hyun-87 Рік тому +3

      @@loveaintfree1409 유튜브 모바일에 번역기가 달려 있습니다...ㅋㅋㅋㅋ

  • @anti-Russia-sigma
    @anti-Russia-sigma 2 роки тому +19

    As the South Korea’s K9 Thunder bombards with shells & the K pop industry bombards with noise,we should surrender to South Korea.😁

  • @imanengineer10
    @imanengineer10 2 роки тому +16

    1 PzH2000 price = 4X K9 thunder + 1X K10 ARV
    And there is an error.
    All parts of K-9 and K-10's hull and turret armor is 35mm RHA minimum.

    • @Yuki_Ika7
      @Yuki_Ika7 2 роки тому +3

      Impressive!

    • @przecie3856
      @przecie3856 Рік тому +3

      Poland give his version of K-9 to Ukraine and they liked.. service is easy and big repair ( exchange) of 52cal armat can be done in short time because of spears parts.👍👍
      PzH2000 is problematic and Germany refused to do services 👎🇩🇪💩🇩🇪👎
      If you not manufacturing company better not buy this from Deutschland 👎👎👎

  • @mughug9616
    @mughug9616 2 роки тому +7

    What are the finance terms like for a K9 over 10 years?

    • @trstnhn
      @trstnhn 2 роки тому +4

      Depends on your credit score and trade-in value. Which tank will you be trading in for the K9?

  • @orhankanal3167
    @orhankanal3167 Рік тому +4

    K9 A4. Obüs yeni versiyon insansız yeni kulesini 155.52 kalibre edilmiş kulesini enterge ettim. Tamamen kendine hedef kere atış yapan özelliği. Ve etkili mevzil 100km azmi mevzil 150km hedef kere atış 13 mermi atış yapma özelliği var

  • @마르마름
    @마르마름 2 роки тому +21

    판매량이 말해준다
    그리고 끊임없이 업그레이드 해준다

    • @edesa8735
      @edesa8735 2 роки тому +2

      가성비로 따라올 무기가 없고 막굴려도 문제없이 할거 다 하니까
      전세계 어딜가도 꿀릴거 없을 정도의 성능과 능력 만땅임.
      많이 많이 사주세요~

  • @bangdoll4500
    @bangdoll4500 2 роки тому +28

    Correcting incorrect information. The armament capabilities of the K9 are as follows:
    18km(M107, HE)
    30km(M549A1, HE-RAP)
    36km(K310, DP-ICMBB)
    40km(K307, HEBB)
    55km(K315, HE-RAP)
    100km(Gliding Guided Artillery Munition - GGAM In development, the prototype is completed, Similar to M982)
    The SPH, which has a distance of less than 40 km on the modern battlefield, is meaningless.

    • @avalonLT
      @avalonLT 2 роки тому +1

      100km?! That crazy, even futher than himars.

  • @caesardicktator3301
    @caesardicktator3301 2 роки тому +32

    Well, we finns have now about 49, propably more now those K9 Thunders, and our military is very pleased about those. And because insane leader behind our 1300 km border with russia...we need to to be ready if those idiots in russia starts attack our small country!! And because we were smart, we have now propably biggest artillery in the Europe...and it is very well trained! Wellcome to Finland you fooker russians!

    • @tarunchem7021
      @tarunchem7021 2 роки тому

      Nd How will Finns protect their howitzer from Low cost Iranian made Russian kamikaze drones ?

    • @raysubsonic
      @raysubsonic 2 роки тому +3

      @@tarunchem7021 the ones made with motorbike engines that you can detect from 40km away?

    • @JohnLee-db9zt
      @JohnLee-db9zt 2 роки тому +1

      @@raysubsonic lol ikr

    • @ROKASniper89
      @ROKASniper89 Рік тому +1

      As a Korean, I know what it is like to have an unstable neighbor. Glad those guns are keeping you safe too.

    • @chewbacca3269
      @chewbacca3269 6 місяців тому

      ​@tarunchem7021 Typically howitzer aren't supposed to be targeted by drones. If they are, then there is something wrong about their placement.

  • @jongminyu9746
    @jongminyu9746 2 роки тому +2

    Performance(S~A), Price (SS), AS(S), Compatibility with Nato and US army (S)

  • @domnikoli
    @domnikoli 2 роки тому +2

    hanwha techwin made my security cameras lol

  • @HKim0072
    @HKim0072 2 роки тому

    Diversification of equipment between allied defense contractors is smart. BAE systems makes the new US version. Germany has a manufacturer for its mobile (long German name) howitzer and UK has another.

  • @YPO6
    @YPO6 2 роки тому +2

    Do these get latest Samsung One UI 5.0?

    • @gamernoob174
      @gamernoob174 2 роки тому +1

      Must be cuz it made my Samsung

  • @CP-28
    @CP-28 2 роки тому +1

    At 3:55 OK, I'm sold!

  • @feltwedge
    @feltwedge 2 роки тому +1

    HE M107 18 KM range with a 52 caliber barrel is worse than the 39 caliber M777 and M198. I wonder why.

  • @francischo1892
    @francischo1892 2 роки тому +4

    welcome to arsenal of free world

  • @onetruekeeper
    @onetruekeeper 2 роки тому +4

    Shoot and scoot capability.

  • @samnelson3852
    @samnelson3852 7 місяців тому +1

    Samsung also makes refrigerators and vacuums!

  • @jimpark8379
    @jimpark8379 6 місяців тому

    The K9 is a great weapon but let's give credit where it's due. The powerpack is a German engine and American Allison transmission, which has a bulletproof reputation and are top notch.
    The K9 is an improved version of USA's M109 Paladin, which is also an excellent howitzer. In fact, before making the K9, Korea made a licensed M109 dubbed the K55 and there's still 1,000 of those K55 in service.
    What separates the K9 is that it's as good as or comparable to everything else out there, it's extremely reliable, and it costs 2x to 3x less.

    • @김시원-d1b
      @김시원-d1b 27 днів тому +1

      Doesn't use German powerpack since september batch, now equipped with newly developed Korean one. Still uses Allison transmission tho 😊

    • @jimpark8379
      @jimpark8379 26 днів тому

      @김시원-d1b Yes, they developed a native Korean engine because the Germs have export restrictions.
      My understanding is Korea spent a ton of money to develop an engine that was 5% more fuel efficient so they can export the K9 to Middle East countries.
      Really, the Germs shouldn't be so difficult because it's made us replace their engines in the K2 tank and K9 howitzer. And they lost licensing fees.

  • @youngmoon8762
    @youngmoon8762 2 роки тому +1

    best base reliable model, can be added optional equipment design chage for the customers request. quick delivery, wide versatile, allowed local production. Cost? not really important. why don't you buy Chinese one?

  • @청솔향-g9u
    @청솔향-g9u 5 місяців тому

    Ultimately, the answer is simple: you can paint the border in a relatively short period of time!

  • @chibonchibon3967
    @chibonchibon3967 2 роки тому +10

    Taiwan need this

  • @peter486
    @peter486 2 роки тому

    because its a sick system that is fine tune for one thing :)

  • @nameless_no_name
    @nameless_no_name 9 місяців тому

    Long range at a fraction of the cost of Euro options

  • @gokusupersaiya8067
    @gokusupersaiya8067 2 роки тому

    my front gate install this things, now my neighbour built china wall

  • @misterbaiter5753
    @misterbaiter5753 2 роки тому +6

    It's so good even North Korea is ordering it.

  • @kelvinbritz9051
    @kelvinbritz9051 2 роки тому +6

    Can you do a show on Russia's thermobaric munition, like the one they used in kherson this week?

    • @dabda8510
      @dabda8510 2 роки тому +2

      TIL
      South Korea has long range guided rocket with thermobaric warhead.
      They can be launched from K239.

  • @hussar843
    @hussar843 2 роки тому +14

    it's cheap and good :D

  • @PankajkumarOraon
    @PankajkumarOraon 2 роки тому +2

    Still afraid of Nuke baby

  • @lmvcnn
    @lmvcnn 2 роки тому +2

    K9 was part of Samsung, look forward to buy Toyota or Nissan howitzer

  • @Bbhai24
    @Bbhai24 2 роки тому +7

    Nice technology

  • @deliabartlett3076
    @deliabartlett3076 2 роки тому

    Love the name, K9……”Cry ‘Havoc’ and let slip the dogs of war..”

  • @dwarkaprasadsharma646
    @dwarkaprasadsharma646 2 роки тому

    इन सबसे बेहतर है Long range MBRL ( Multi barrel Rocket Launcher)

  • @frankschmidt2303
    @frankschmidt2303 7 місяців тому

    Looks like the Swedish bandvagn 1

  • @internetpeople6113
    @internetpeople6113 6 місяців тому

    Is Ukraine using this?

  • @shinshin367
    @shinshin367 2 роки тому +3

    cost performance

  • @ProsecutionaccCusomsChennai-VI
    @ProsecutionaccCusomsChennai-VI 4 місяці тому

    India has K9 bro.......Cool

  • @구연이-s9p
    @구연이-s9p 2 роки тому +1

    아마 전자동 기계식이라서 ?!
    실제 폭탄 무개는 엉청나다 !
    폭탄 무개 들어 올리는 순간, 뼈마디가 내려 앉는다. .

  • @deyangxie136
    @deyangxie136 2 роки тому

    millimeter / millimetre is not spelled millimiter

  • @aigumoney
    @aigumoney 2 роки тому +1

    because S.Korea deployed 1200 K-9s in Korea. It can be cheap. and "supply chain" isn't bad. K-9 bas been sold many to several countries. sum of them is around 1000. even include Poland. .. did I say S.Korea deployed 1200 K-9s? oh yeah. I did. that's why K-9 can be cheap. it is sad fact. not proud. S.Korea has been still in the cold war but the others hasn't.

    • @kimj2570
      @kimj2570 Рік тому

      I didnt quite understand. Sad fact being South Korea has been still with Cold War? What that does mean?

    • @GoogIe_UK
      @GoogIe_UK Рік тому +1

      ​@@kimj2570 South Korea is still at war with North Korea. However, they signed a ceasefire in 1953, so there are no longer any attacks on each other. A lot of time has passed since then, so many foreigners are not aware of this.
      The Korean War was a truce, not an end

    • @kookie175
      @kookie175 Рік тому

      @@GoogIe_UK indeed. many people who doesn't hasn't read up on the Korean War thinks the war has ended when in actual fact both countries are technically still at war in the present.

  • @formacionG13
    @formacionG13 2 роки тому +2

    I still dont understand the difference between this and a tank. Am military dumb

    • @ScorpionMinds
      @ScorpionMinds 2 роки тому +7

      The Thunder is a mobile Artillery platform for long range support fire with thin armor while a tank like the M1A1 or Leopard A7 etc. are better armored and more for suitable for close combat environments with a 105mm Gun and ranges of up to 5-10 km.

    • @formacionG13
      @formacionG13 2 роки тому +4

      @@ScorpionMinds ok. More like one is for range while the other for closed combat. Is that what your saying?

    • @hishot1078
      @hishot1078 2 роки тому +2

      MBT (main battle tank) is for close fight, armor vs armor, while SPH (self-propelled howiter) is for indirect fire support.

    • @saff3356
      @saff3356 2 роки тому +1

      @@ScorpionMinds you mean 120mm gun

    • @DEVILFISH1122
      @DEVILFISH1122 2 роки тому +1

      @@formacionG13 the thunder is basically an artillery platform that’s highly mobile, it’s gun traverse is a lot more than a tanks, and is designed for long range accurate fire missions that a tanks guns could never match

  • @jopiaspieder1184
    @jopiaspieder1184 2 місяці тому

    I want these for my nation

  • @michaeldoxey1240
    @michaeldoxey1240 4 місяці тому

    A $100 drone will wipe it out. Star Wars/Drone Wars, it's the future!

  • @dobrin3106
    @dobrin3106 7 місяців тому

    suamsung cooked on that one

  • @heromail2903
    @heromail2903 2 роки тому +3

    This howitzer is excellent at repelling Russian armed forces which wreac havoc around the world

  • @AdamBechtol
    @AdamBechtol 2 роки тому +4

    What bizarre narration.
    "against" "deserts"
    Though the AI quality has only a few years left, maybe not even, until it's indistinguishable.

    • @raysubsonic
      @raysubsonic 2 роки тому +1

      Agreed. The vast major of the narration is meaningless.

  • @dhodzespinosa3409
    @dhodzespinosa3409 2 роки тому +1

    Here In Philippines..we have K10..
    K10 or C10 short for
    KAYETAN-10 LIBO..

  • @rajumohan9336
    @rajumohan9336 2 роки тому +1

    RAJUMOHAN PRESS 💯💯💯💯🌍🇮🇳🇮🇳🙏👌👌👌👍👍

  • @jwc3104
    @jwc3104 Рік тому +2

    It's basically an updated PzH 2000 at 1/3 of the price.

    • @jonny2954
      @jonny2954 Рік тому

      PZH 2000 is still better stat-wise, just more expensive.

  • @ariffadam8540
    @ariffadam8540 Рік тому +4

    I hope Malaysia government would buy it.
    Hope it's air-conditioned.

  • @Aetemaad4
    @Aetemaad4 2 роки тому +1

    extreme

  • @videoforum4047
    @videoforum4047 2 роки тому +1

    Suomi finland perkele

  • @gorethegreat
    @gorethegreat 2 роки тому

    Wow !!

  • @Sophocles13
    @Sophocles13 Рік тому +1

    I'm so confused by these narrators... they have flawless American accents but they sound like they're reading really bad translations/ can't pronounce certain words... what's the deal?

  • @jeffarchibald3837
    @jeffarchibald3837 2 роки тому +7

    How is it that Korea is taking the lead in artillery and tank systems when we Americans spend trillions on defense? We are getting ripped off by US arms companies. Also we spent trillions defending Korea for 70 years while they saved money to do this. Time to leave Korea, they can defeat the north easily without us. Kudos to Korea for these brilliant systems.

    • @mgtowski395
      @mgtowski395 2 роки тому

      1. US taxpayers are getting ripped off by arms companies 2. Korea pays the US for defense costs 3. Korea buys a bunch of USA made weapons 4. Korea supported USA in Vietnam, Iraq, and other places and projects

    • @llIlIlllIllllIlIl
      @llIlIlllIllllIlIl 2 роки тому

      The reason Americans are here is because of the China. The beggers in the cold fields are nothing.

    • @jeffarchibald3837
      @jeffarchibald3837 2 роки тому

      @@llIlIlllIllllIlIl Due to Korean topography even China couldn't due anything rapid. If they did killing a few thousand US soldiers won't matter. If Korea wants them to stay let then pay the cost in full, including pensions etc. We have propped up Korea for too long.

    • @gglee46
      @gglee46 2 роки тому

      If the U.S. gives up its check on China, it will be possible to withdraw U.S. troops from South Korea. But will the U.S. be just watching China grow?

    • @dingchavez1960
      @dingchavez1960 2 роки тому

      Whoa there, that's a lot of oversimplified Trumpist speak. There are lots of reasons for the things you're talking about. You're not wrong, you're just oversimplifying by a lot, and knowing some details could get you thinking deeper, whether or not you keep wanting the US military off Korea. Just read up, it's interesting. Anyways, the real money drain isn't stationing troops in Korea, it's all the free-world countries giving all their jobs to China. If it continues, we are all doomed. Think about it, we've all made China the Amazon/Walmart of the world and the rest of us are high-ticket specialty shops. Stupidest thing ever.

  • @ThePearsson
    @ThePearsson 2 роки тому +5

    It’s bad ass, but i would choose the Swedish Archer system from BAE. 7 rounds in 9 seconds and more agile.

    • @ShinbeKiyawara
      @ShinbeKiyawara 2 роки тому +15

      Archer and K9 is different beast. Wheeled vs tracked. Many country prefer tracked vehicle for a reason.

    • @cstgraphpads2091
      @cstgraphpads2091 2 роки тому +7

      7 rounds in 9 seconds only in ideal conditions.

    • @Ch1maera
      @Ch1maera 2 роки тому +8

      The archer is probably better for countries with more flatlands. Since its wheeled but for countries like korea which is around 70% mountainous terrain wheeled vehicles are inferior to tracked vehicles.

    • @raysubsonic
      @raysubsonic 2 роки тому +7

      1 Archer with all auxilary systems would probably cost double the cost of a K9. The K9 is hands down the most common self-propelled howitzer on the planet. By now there's probably more of these operating in more militaries than Palladins.

  • @L3_FR
    @L3_FR 2 роки тому

    Extrem pOwer - militaryTV, 1000bc, probably.

  • @SemiPro_Nub
    @SemiPro_Nub 2 роки тому +2

    Me, a World of Tanks blitz player : “oof! 19mm armour. HE rounds from the Panther I would pass through like butter.”

    • @youngmoon8762
      @youngmoon8762 2 роки тому

      yeh..but 155mm can destroy you even it not hit you. it will flip your tank like a Turtle even it hit the ground near you.

    • @SemiPro_Nub
      @SemiPro_Nub 2 роки тому

      @@youngmoon8762 Panther I was a highly mobile medium Tank. K9 is a Tank artillery. Big difference. K9 long reload time and not very mobile when compared to a Panther I.
      Would be similar to a real world modern version of the British FV215b 183. Except the 215b has a 183mm gun. It is a Tank destroyer.
      Also, Panther I was a Nazi German Tank not currently in use by any military. You can find them in museums.
      And no, on 1v1 scenarios, No medium tanks will come even close to “flip your tank like a Turtle” against it. In fact, it will get HE’d. Prediction, 1st shot miss (k9) and then boom! Just like the FV 215b 183

  • @Absilon13
    @Absilon13 2 роки тому

    This is almost same as krab only difference is the chasis is of korean made but the turret design is british altered/ augmented by poland.

  • @martinblank1484
    @martinblank1484 2 роки тому

    The title question isn't even answered....waste of time...👎

  • @geoffworsnop5726
    @geoffworsnop5726 2 роки тому +1

    Atmos 2000 still the beast

  • @hwangjake5221
    @hwangjake5221 2 роки тому

    가성비

  • @russell7489
    @russell7489 2 роки тому +1

    Skip to the very end for only info that makes the most recent variant still in development game changing albeit at even more complexity, but as we have seen in Ukraine, it appears hi tech and complexity DOES out do quantity, so. Otherwise this is the worst mil tech review I've ever seen.

  • @2ndbut3rd
    @2ndbut3rd 5 місяців тому

    Samsung 💀

  • @johntexas7493
    @johntexas7493 2 роки тому

    Cheaper and western standard

  • @sunilmotwani8982
    @sunilmotwani8982 Рік тому +1

    12123456 fire

  • @jonathanthink5830
    @jonathanthink5830 2 роки тому +1

    when i saw samsung....... it reminds me of my leaky washing machine ..... :-)

  • @picszoid4529
    @picszoid4529 2 роки тому +1

    K9 Bajra

  • @adamnordinrogers
    @adamnordinrogers 8 місяців тому +1

    Archer is better design

  • @reptarbun
    @reptarbun 2 роки тому

    I was a k9 crew member... I hate this thing. Yeah it's cool... but you would also hate it if you've ever had to do maintenance on this monstrosity...

  • @박주영-u5b
    @박주영-u5b 2 роки тому +4

    필요없음 안사면될거아냐!!!!! 한국의 주력 K9 욕하지말고 당신들나라에는 있는지나 확인해보쇼! 우린 자체개발한K9입나다.