Massad Ayoob - What is an Expert Witness? Critical Mas Episode 18
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 лип 2024
- What qualifies someone as an expert witness? As an expert witness in homicide and weapon trials since 1979, Massad Ayoob knows what it takes. If you have knowledge that is beyond that of a typical jury, and if your knowledge has value, you could be an expert witness too. Massad shares how you could be put on the stand and what to expect.
Massad Ayoob Group: massadayoobgroup.com
Subscribe: ua-cam.com/users/subscription_center?a...
Website: www.wilsoncombat.com/
UA-cam Community: / gowilsoncombat
Get our newsletter: eepurl.com/dAZw8b
Facebook: / wilsoncombat
Instagram: / wilsoncombat
Critical Mas(s) with Massad Ayoob is a show that provides expert analysis over a wide range of contemporaneous topics related to civilian and law enforcement self defense, the use of force, and second amendment issues, provided by a renowned and established author with a career spanning decades in training law enforcement officers and the public at large, who is frequently called upon to provide expert witness testimony.
ABOUT MASSAD AYOOB:
Massad Ayoob has been handgun editor of GUNS magazine and law enforcement columnist for AMERICAN HANDGUNNER since the 1970s, and has published thousands of articles in gun magazines, martial arts publications, and law enforcement journals. He is the author of some twenty books on firearms, self-defense, and related topics, including “In the Gravest Extreme” and “Deadly Force,” widely considered to be authoritative texts on the topic of the use of lethal force.
The winner of the Outstanding American Handgunner of the Year Award in 1998, Mas has won several state and regional handgun shooting championships. Ayoob was the first person to earn the title of Five Gun Master in the International Defensive Pistol Association. He is the current President of the Second Amendment Foundation. He served 19 years as chair of the Firearms Committee of the American Society of Law Enforcement Trainers, and several years as a member of the Advisory Board of the International Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association. In addition to teaching for those groups, he has also taught
for the International Association of Law Enforcement Firearms Instructors and the International Homicide Investigators seminars.
Mas has received judicial recognition as an expert witness for the courts in weapons and shooting cases since 1979, and served as a fully sworn and empowered, part time police officer for 43 years, mostly at supervisor rank. Ayoob founded the Lethal Force Institute in 1981 and served as its director until 2009, and now trains through Massad Ayoob Group. He has
appeared on CLE-TV delivering continuing legal education for attorneys, through the American Law Institute and American Bar Association, and has been retained to train attorneys to handle deadly force cases through the Armed Citizens Legal Defense Network. Ayoob served for two
years as co-vice chair of the Forensic Evidence Committee of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. He also appeared in each episode of Personal Defense TV (Sportsman’s Channel).
0:00 - Expert Witness Experience
1:05 - What is the job of an Expert Witness
3:25 - Medical Malpractice Example
4:30 - Self Defense Example
6:15 - Probative Value
7:55 - Need for Voices of Knowledge
8:30 - What Qualifies an Expert Witness
9:40 - Use of Demonstrative Evidence
11:30 - Opposition in a Trial
13:10 - Example of Demonstration
#MassadAyoob #WilsonCombat #CriticalMas - Спорт
Even the way he says "bullshit" is teeming with wisdom and authority. This man truly is a wealth of knowledge for anyone that wants to protect themselves.
This man is a national treasure. His calm and distinct voice commands attention when he speaks.
I have several books he was featured in. I've been reading his articles in magazines for many many years..
My dad served as an expert witness in a murder trial in Bagdad, Arizona in the 1970s. The defendant shot a deputy with a .300 Savage. State said it was from point-blank, possibly contact range. Defendant said it was a distance and that he did not recognize the deputy. Dad looked at some grisly autopsy photos and concluded there was no way it was from close range. He ended up taking the judge and lawyers to the range and shooting a pork roast with the rifle from inches away. Needless to say Dad wore a poncho. The state conceded the wound was not consistent with a close-range shot.
As always, listening to Massad is enjoyable and informative. Absolutely gifted & practiced in the ability to deliver clear and concise information.
Much appreciated!
Buh-bang!
@@gowilsoncombat Law student here. I've had training in use of force and have learned a ton from Mr. Ayoob's videos and articles. I hope I can make the legal profession better by educating colleagues and being able to explain concepts more effectively to judges and juries.
I testified, under oath, hundreds of time as an expert witness in the field of real estate valuation over a 40+ year career. The vast majority of these cases involved a governmental entity taking property and/or property rights from an individual through condemnation. I was engaged by both condemnors and condemnees. I was "disengaged" (fired) prior to any testimony in nearly an equal number of cases as I actually testified in. This was almost always because, after doing my research and analysis, my opinion did not support what my client wanted me to say. As an unbiased qualified expert, I could not testify to something which I did not believe and could not support with the facts of the case.
Mr. Ayoob, if you keep putting out these videos and information, I'll keep watching. I thank Wilson Combat for having you on so often. =)
I wish there was an Ask Mas Questions feature from time to time on this channel.
I would ask: What is the main reason that most American law enforcement departments issue Glock pistols to their street officers?
Reliability resulting in fewer mechanical problems requiring replacing the pistols over time?
Discount pricing which Glock issues to Law Enforcement departments?
*Simplicity. Fewer levers on the gun to be wrongly positioned during a combat situation?
Availability of an official OEM New York trigger to reduce likeliness of accidental discharge?
* I count 8 levers to be found on semi auto pistols (trigger, hammer, thumb safety, grip safety, decocker, slide release, mag release, take down lever).
The Glock does not have 4 of those (hammer, decocker, thumb safety, grip safety). Another 3 are relatively difficult to access through the first 3 generations and so unlikely to cause a problem during combat (take down lever, slide release, mag release). Which leaves only the trigger.
I really don't know which of the 4 reasons I came up with plays the biggest part. I would guess the Blue Label discount program.
I have served as an expert witness in civil litigation for over 30 years in a different field. I also worked in law enforcement during the same time period Mas did. I expect that regardless of the expertise, the process of investigation, deposition, and trial testimony is similar. I am looking forward to learning his presentation.
You're amazing Mr. Ayoob. I learn so much from your videos. Ty and thank you Mr. Wilson for sponsoring them.
Glad you like them!
Andrew branca talks about you in high regard, I’m learning as much as I can about self-defense law. this was a fantastic video.
Thanks Mas!!! Been following you for years! Keep fighting the fight…
Always
If I needed someone to explain something gun related on my behalf Massad would be welcomed. Expert is an understatement describing that man
*Expert Extraordinaire*
Have read his articles for years and always comm sense and easy to understand
Massad I always enjoy you very informative talks/instruction. I certainly feel as I am not being lectured to, but just listing to a friend talk to me.
I also enjoy your books and videos.
Wonderful!
I actually recall the Alvarez case. In '84, I was 20 years old, and had just started really paying attention to firearms training and defensive use issues a couple of years earlier, as I was beginning to consider a career in law enforcement. I remember Mas mentioning this case in one of his magazine articles at the time. Funny how this all comes back around so many years later.
Thanks Mr. Ayoob. Always appreciated.
Always welcome
What do you see as the pros and cons of arming teachers? Your down to earth analysis would be useful to many.
Even though I periodically serve as an expert witness, I learned a great deal about being a good expert from your various videos.
Amen!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ACLDN member!!!!
Words of wisdom Thank You Sir
Mr. Ayoob, you absolutely blow me away... umm, though not literally, lol.
Stay Well, Mass.
Great presentation.
God Bless.
Great demonstration Massad Ayoob. I'm looking forward to attending the MAG 40. Keep em coming.
Your advice would be great for any expert witness in all fields. I spent over 30 years in worker’s compensation, safety and labor relations and have seen several “experts” humiliated by our good attorneys. Expect as an expert to be thoroughly vetted by the opposition, as Massad stated.
I was a PI for almost 20 years. Testified in probably close to 100 cases. All of them pretty minor. Was also the victim of attempted crimes several times, so testified as a plaintiff another half dozen times or so as well in that capacity.
Very good definition of expert witness. 👍😊🇺🇸
This is a lot to take in in just a few minutes. I could watch these videos over and over.
I have served as an expert witness since 2008 in an unrelated field.
I've been an expert witness in a murder trial and I still occasionally provide informal advice to my brother, who is a criminal attorney. I agree 100% with everything Massad Ayoob said. Of course, he's one of the top experts in this field.
One of your best videos Massad
Really great explanation of the process. I have been a testifying expert since 1995 in the building code / construction / land use field, and the idea that "the truth will out" is fortunately almost always true. But, if one decides to get into this field, be aware that sometimes even a perfectly executed case will result in a loss. Winning or losing cannot be the primary factor in the investigation or testimony of an expert.
As usual always enjoy listening and learning from Mr. Ayoob! Thank you and keep up the good work.
My pleasure
Thank You for your service to "We the People", and as always Ecellent Content.
To your question, No ! neither should at least half the professional ” experts” whose main function is to muddy the waters and introduce reasonable doubt.
*Thanks for the expert information.*
*Thumbs up # 258*
Thanks for visiting
When Mas speaks on such a subject, you would be well advised to pay close attention. Listen and learn.
Thank you for the valuable information,been a fan since your early articles in magazines
Awesome, thank you!
Super interesting; keep dropping these
We will!
Very educational and interesting. Thank you again
Our pleasure!
Excellent work. Thank you
Our pleasure!
I served as a expert witness on a murder trail! Pretty stressful
Thanks Mas, always good content.
Much appreciated
Mr. Ayoob I have a question for you. I used to think in a defensive scenario I would hold the attacker at gunpoint till the police arrive. I've since changed my mind. First of all, if I held an attacker at gunpoint, the first thing I'd do is make him disarm himself, this means I'd be pointing a loaded gun at an unarmed attacker and telling him if he tries to run away, I'll shoot him in the back (essentially). In other words, if I'm not willing to shoot an unarmed man who is trying to flee, then I can't really hold him at gunpoint, other than to disarm him, and warn him that I'll shoot if he tries to approach me, or weapons. Any thoughts on this?
Thanks.
❤🧡💛💚💙💜🖤
A suggestion by Mas (and others) is to make copies of training materials and mail them to yourself. Do not open the envelope, and then only in front of witnesses, unless you need to prove that you knew the material at the time of a self defense incident. The postmark on the unopened envelope shows the latest possible date on which you could have acquired the knowledge.
I wonder if you could do the same with your own personal knowledge. For example, the Tueller Drill and how the athletic ability of the assailant and defender lengthens or shortens the critical distance. It would show your level of understanding at the time of an incident.
I would like to hear more about identifying “diploma mills”... I have numerous certificates from taking self defense training classes, I keep them in a binder for ready access... would these mean I could be an expert witness, or merely a person who attends classes a lot? My instructors were folks like Andrew Branca, John Lovell, and another fellow who trains police here.
Just pimping the algorithm!
Thanks Mas....good stuff....I have a PHD...." Post Hole Digger "
Mas could read the back of a cereal box and make it interesting.
Correctly described. Most layperson's have no idea what the "reaction gap" is. Not do they understand that those who have received firearms qualification as ,in my case, a corrections officer, are taught to shoot to stop and not shoot to kill to keep yourself and or others from serious bodily harm or death. That also applies to someone attempting to cause property damage that may cause serious bodily harm or death to yourself or others.
*What is the point you're trying to make?*
*I ask that because, E.G.; I've proved through training, that if you're pointing your gun at an another person, who is also holding a gun at their side pointed down, and you're commanding them to drop their weapon; They can point and shoot you before you can pull your trigger.*
*(Try that one out, and see)*
*Also, there's many who have died in gunfights, thinking they could simply wound an assailant, only to have that assailant kill them and others around them.*
*I got that Massad was proving that those who have indoctrinated training, may need a reality check on real life gunfights.*
*LE has different priorities than civilians do, and you guys are laying your life on the line by using the "shoot to stop and not shoot to kill" method.*
*Bravery that I will never exude as a civilian, as self preservation is why I have a CCW.*
@@tropocal2343 There are SO many variables when it comes to using a firearm in self defense. My point was simply this. I was taught a certain way and I also tried to I instill what I was taught, as a trainer, the "rules" that applied to my situation as a corrections officer. Every situation is different. In any type of public safety field there is a force continueum that one must follow. No matter how you feel, ultimately you have to justify, given the circumstances, why you pulled the trigger on another human being. Also, in a defensive situation, you have only a split second to make that decision and this idea that you shoot an assailant in the arm or leg to sound is a load of crap. In my opinion, no matter how much you train, when the adrenaline starts to flow, all you can do is react then justify why you did what you did.
@@tropocal2343 As an addendum, I believe Mass would agree with me on this. You never want to say after a self defense shooting "I shot to kill". Even if you shot center mass and killed the assailant, you shot to "stop" the individual from causing death or serious bodily harm.
@@brianstamm1314 *Yes, I agree with your opinion; "SO many variables", and commend you on your service as a corrections officer.*
*Thanks for the explanation.*
*BTW, one of my firearms trainers was an active FBI agent, who didn't know about the scenario I mentioned with the reaction time favoring the one (weapon down vs weapon targeting) who makes the decision to shoot.*
*We demonstrated it in class, and confirmed the hypothesis.*
*He used to tell us to yell out (for witness benefits) " Drop your weapon" x2 before you fire, but now has changed that to make those commands as you fire.*
*I would urge you to try it, and spread the word, so layperson's can better understand the "reaction gap" you speak of.*
@@tropocal2343 Thank you. Stay safe.
When you shoot. Find all the witness that seen you shoot.
Sir do you have any weapons? Mas - No but I have a folding pocket knife.
4:55 10 feet apart is *well* within deadly range of a bladed weapon... It's debatable if someone concealed carrying would be able to draw, aim and fire, before Stabby sticks or sIashes them... *Very* dangerous situation... 😶😶😶😶
No, but Scotty Reitz could be one.
I'm a little late to responding to this video because I'm new member who subscribed but could Brian co-worker had been the victim invited to this home and he had to kill those four in a sense of Delta self-defense so far things are looking like he didn't even was not even there and when they do bring them into court
Define expert-
X- has been
Spert- a drip under pressure!
That vidio, although good, leaves alot of questions. But that's just me.
L