PLEASE play more vic3, haven’t seen anybody else with your level of half-meta-knowledge-half-complete-novice energy, it’s super interesting to watch to deal with different challenges. I’d give you advice but I’m loving watching you handle things on your own lol
Glad to see that Potato is playing Vicky 3. I know it’s not everybody’s cup of tea, but I always enjoy it when he goes outside of Civ every now and then.
Since seeing you first place this game a couple years ago and I am hooked! I have like 900 hours and the newest patch goes craaaazy hard. in the current Civ hiatus between 6 and 7, its been filling the void and making me realize what civ has been missing for decades.
Happy to see more Vic 3, I've loved the game since SOI and found the various thunderdome patches something comical. Heres to more balance in the near future and it'll be even grander
Hell yes Vicky 3 You couldve gotten Tenant Farmers passed if you granted the Market Liberal Landowner agitator leadership of the Interest Group. You right click the agitaror and Grant Leadership. Its extremely powerful to get the Modern Conservative early game in a traditionalist country.
@@thespiffingbrit I don't even have ws to express my gratitude - but go Denmark, spoken an Inuit!.. My Goodness that would be grand! Thanks, Potato! Do remember that you're loved!.. Loads of love from Denmark 🤗
@@thespiffingbrit Woohoo!! I'm on "The List!" - you know.... if you switch a letter, The List becomes "The Lust! 😈 pr the" The Lost"(that would be you, but Denmark doesn't regret letting go of that dysfunctional former colony of Britain - it's a mess we wouldn't like our comfortable lives interfere with 😁
I love how you go so deep into the mechanics and explain your reasoning. I learned quite a few new things! I need to look at my pops in more detail, there's a ton of cool stuff!
"My people, I am sorry, the British have such a strong navy. I feared for our country should they bring it to bear, I *had* to accept their demand to ban slavery. For the sake of *peace*. (and certainly not because now I make a bunch more money)"
i love the way you explain how things work. usually, i look at all these different things and numbers and have no clue how they piece together. the way you explain things make them appear like the really matter, then i see the effect they have as it becomes a domino effect of problem solving. well done!
2:30 Unless they changed this for 1.7 it's often a bad idea to get construction sectors early on as having construction sectors causes your construction to split into the private/government queues. Yes, the total amount of construction goes up, but you lose control over some of it. With Traditionalism that's not too bad as you only go from 10 to 9 but for small countries with better starting economy laws (Algeria on older patches started with Interventionism, Krakow starts with Laissez-faire) that can be a massive loss of control in your economy and even the drop from 10 to 9 government construction adds up in the long run.
Private construction is not bad anymore with 1.7, while you loose control, they usually build useful stuff. You generally don't want to own the buildings anymore since it's very inefficient and you will loose more money on the bureaucracy than you make off dividends.
God I love your Paradox content so much! I remember watching the EU4 Ireland video and itching for more, please, give us more Paradox! It's so good and you're so knowledgable!
You misplayed the corn laws. If you grant the market liberal landowner leadership, the landowners will support getting of serfdom and traditionalism 13:52
His landowner leader is the Emperor. If he were to replace him he would have lost all his combat advantage. Corn Laws are OP don't get me wrong but it aint +30 on attack OP
@@berkdikmen95 no, you can grant the market liberal agitator leadership of the landowner party while still maintaining the emperor since you are a monarchy as Ethiopia.
A tip for U: (I don't know if have sphere of influence or not, but I will assume yes) You could have cancelled the homesteading law annecmant, had only the rural folk in goverment, and abdicate to the newly radicalised Homesteading revolt, which would enact it instantly.
POTATOOOOOO I LOVE YOU SO MUCHHH!!!! I WAS LOOKING FOR YOU TO PLAY VIC 3 FOR A LONG TIME!!!! HERE WE GO!!!!! I WAS WATCHING YOU SINCE CIV 6, MUCH LOVE!!!!!!!!!!
I love watching you play this game because I can not wrap my head around it, no matter how many video's I watch. I can not wait for the rest of this series!
I think you need to have a port in sulfurland to connect it to your market, since it is separated by water. Getting a navy was probably a bad call, since it costs so much. Better to expand via land and use funds for building things like gold mines. Government construction needs to stay on.
usually i dont watch vids this long but this has been playing as background audio and i just realised im almost through the whole thing, nice one, you managed to keep my interest more than like 90% of content on this site :3
If you made the agitator you got from the corn laws JE the leader of the landowners then you could've gotten tenant farmers or homesteading easily, as well as getting rid of traditionalism.
Decreasing government wages is usually a bad thing - you saved like 500 by paying them less, but losing -10% prestige put you down to Minor power and that came with extra costs from interest.
Here are some tips i wanna share: - Dont build construction sectors untill you can afford 20 because you are wasting your money and not building what you want faster but slower. (So once you get 100 iron in your market and build 2 construction sectors set on iron) - When you get journal for market liberal, give him leadership and enact homesteading instead of tenant farms. He will give you more success chance and no stall as leader instead of agitator. Also market liberals have the same opinion on tenant farms and homesteading. - Market liberals also hates traditionalism, so you can get agrarianism or laissez-faire - love your videos.
30:14 “A promote social mobility decree in Somaliland, alongside the violent suppression” The sheer emotional dissonance of those words’ connotations is astounding
6:00 you can make agitator a ruler of the intrest group by rightclicking on him, so then the landowners political power would also support the reforms and not only the movements the agitator starts
I thought the enactment of tenant farmers was going to be stuck given the UI showing the enactment was paused and your illegitimate government. Forgot that political movements allow you to push laws anyway. Good to know.
I don't know if this is locked behind a DLC, but you can grant leadership of a interest group to an agitator so you could have made that market liberal the leader of the landowners and enact tenant farmers, laissez fare and free trade easily.
i have played multiple rounds in 1.7 and never managed to get rid of radicals, especially in conquest oriented rounds it seems to be a constant problem. I hope they will change radicals from standard of living to compare it to the regional average instead of solely look at the change.
Well it stands to reason you'll never make everyone happy (outside of late-ish game full communism setups but even those will have a few radicals), what really matters is exactly who those radicals are and support.
This was a pretty classic example of what happens when you grow fast as a country with rubbish tech but lag on political reforms. Your growth stalls out, which prevents you from investing into tech, which means you miss out on growth from better production methods and ultimately fail to get the exponential growth you need to succeed when starting with such a big tech handicap. Sometimes it's better to grow more slowly since the more built up your states are, the stronger the useful IGs such as industrialists are. More reforms can be more important than more land. p.s. your dudes wanted consumption-only taxation because 20% of your population was radicals, probably mostly from running v high taxes a lot but you also generated extra radicals by conquering territory when you already had high infamy
he subsidieses buildings that cant hire staff because of general worker shortage. does this have any affect on more people becomming hired? Also, later (35:12) he subsidies clipper production. the factory shows that input goods are cheap and output good is expensive, meaning the factory already is highly sentivised to satrt production as high as possible. does subsidisieng do anything in this case?
Subsidizing a building will force it to hire pops if they're available and cause already employed pops to jump over as well. Can be useful to subsidize a freshly built building for a few weeks to get it up and running faster which can be rather useful when it is part of a feedback loop (like Iron Mines and Tool Workshops).
it barely looks like you are playing the same game I played or watched other people play. how many windows, options, lists, tabs and mechanics this game has that I've never seem before ?
Dang, potato playing Vic 3 with the skill like he invented the game meanwhile everyone is migrating away from my country and I'm 2k in the red on max taxes and minimum wages and I have no idea what happened to get there in the first place or how to fix it lol
PLEASE play more vic3, haven’t seen anybody else with your level of half-meta-knowledge-half-complete-novice energy, it’s super interesting to watch to deal with different challenges. I’d give you advice but I’m loving watching you handle things on your own lol
@@meh4101 100% agree
Generalist Gaming? He's big in the Vic3 community.
Glad to see that Potato is playing Vicky 3.
I know it’s not everybody’s cup of tea, but I always enjoy it when he goes outside of Civ every now and then.
Came for the Civ, stayed for the Potato
Since seeing you first place this game a couple years ago and I am hooked! I have like 900 hours and the newest patch goes craaaazy hard. in the current Civ hiatus between 6 and 7, its been filling the void and making me realize what civ has been missing for decades.
Happy to see more Vic 3, I've loved the game since SOI and found the various thunderdome patches something comical. Heres to more balance in the near future and it'll be even grander
Hell yes Vicky 3
You couldve gotten Tenant Farmers passed if you granted the Market Liberal Landowner agitator leadership of the Interest Group. You right click the agitaror and Grant Leadership. Its extremely powerful to get the Modern Conservative early game in a traditionalist country.
Could do a funny Denmark run - if only to lovingly poke a bit of fun at Spiffing B... lots of love from Greenland
Your going on the list...
@@thespiffingbrit I don't even have ws to express my gratitude - but go Denmark, spoken an Inuit!..
My Goodness that would be grand!
Thanks, Potato! Do remember that you're loved!..
Loads of love from Denmark 🤗
@@thespiffingbrit Woohoo!! I'm on "The List!" - you know.... if you switch a letter, The List becomes "The Lust! 😈 pr the" The Lost"(that would be you, but Denmark doesn't regret letting go of that dysfunctional former colony of Britain - it's a mess we wouldn't like our comfortable lives interfere with 😁
I love how you go so deep into the mechanics and explain your reasoning. I learned quite a few new things! I need to look at my pops in more detail, there's a ton of cool stuff!
"My people, I am sorry, the British have such a strong navy. I feared for our country should they bring it to bear, I *had* to accept their demand to ban slavery. For the sake of *peace*. (and certainly not because now I make a bunch more money)"
🤣🤣
You ahve mastered the art of politic talk.😂
i love the way you explain how things work. usually, i look at all these different things and numbers and have no clue how they piece together. the way you explain things make them appear like the really matter, then i see the effect they have as it becomes a domino effect of problem solving. well done!
I love when the AI pushes a wargoal you wanted anyway like a Slavery Banned.
2:30 Unless they changed this for 1.7 it's often a bad idea to get construction sectors early on as having construction sectors causes your construction to split into the private/government queues. Yes, the total amount of construction goes up, but you lose control over some of it. With Traditionalism that's not too bad as you only go from 10 to 9 but for small countries with better starting economy laws (Algeria on older patches started with Interventionism, Krakow starts with Laissez-faire) that can be a massive loss of control in your economy and even the drop from 10 to 9 government construction adds up in the long run.
Private construction is not bad anymore with 1.7, while you loose control, they usually build useful stuff. You generally don't want to own the buildings anymore since it's very inefficient and you will loose more money on the bureaucracy than you make off dividends.
I would love to keep seeing more Victoria 3 content in the future!
Next challenge: take EVERY east coastline as Ethiopia
This but chille
@@thespiffingbrit I tip my hat to thee, one fine gentleman to another 🎩
Easthiopia
@@An0xymoron127 The Sun never rises save on the Ethiopian Empire
@@thespiffingbrit that’s on the west, and in that case you might as well create the Oregon Empire 🥂
I can not wait to see more of this game! Id love to see a begginers guide/in depth series of this one if you dont have it already
Love Vic3 on the Channel ❤
Yes, more V3 please!
You explain things so well, I've played like 50 hrs and didn't know half the things in the first 10 mins lol - more videos
God I love your Paradox content so much! I remember watching the EU4 Ireland video and itching for more, please, give us more Paradox! It's so good and you're so knowledgable!
Fabulous stuff, love to see you turn a teeny tiny African minor into a grand power
I love your victoria 3 vids
1:10:00 The peasants have always been revolting, Prince. But *now*, they're rebelling.
You misplayed the corn laws. If you grant the market liberal landowner leadership, the landowners will support getting of serfdom and traditionalism 13:52
His landowner leader is the Emperor. If he were to replace him he would have lost all his combat advantage. Corn Laws are OP don't get me wrong but it aint +30 on attack OP
@@berkdikmen95no he isn’t
@@berkdikmen95 no, you can grant the market liberal agitator leadership of the landowner party while still maintaining the emperor since you are a monarchy as Ethiopia.
@@Arjonko so emporer is the head of state but not the head of the interest group he is part of?
@@berkdikmen95 correct
Hot start to a fun game, looking forward to the East African theocracy!
We need more of this! Serfdom is not going to be to helpful though 😂. No free builder charges.
A tip for U: (I don't know if have sphere of influence or not, but I will assume yes) You could have cancelled the homesteading law annecmant, had only the rural folk in goverment, and abdicate to the newly radicalised Homesteading revolt, which would enact it instantly.
POTATOOOOOO I LOVE YOU SO MUCHHH!!!! I WAS LOOKING FOR YOU TO PLAY VIC 3 FOR A LONG TIME!!!! HERE WE GO!!!!! I WAS WATCHING YOU SINCE CIV 6, MUCH LOVE!!!!!!!!!!
A crusader kings 3 with the game of thrones mod, series would be awesome!
I love watching you play this game because I can not wrap my head around it, no matter how many video's I watch. I can not wait for the rest of this series!
1:07:55
"Why are you so mad!"
4 million radicals
Dude, everyone is mad.
I think you need to have a port in sulfurland to connect it to your market, since it is separated by water. Getting a navy was probably a bad call, since it costs so much. Better to expand via land and use funds for building things like gold mines. Government construction needs to stay on.
usually i dont watch vids this long but this has been playing as background audio and i just realised im almost through the whole thing, nice one, you managed to keep my interest more than like 90% of content on this site :3
they are supporting consumption based taxation because they consume very little that means they will be paying less taxes :)
Glad you played this game and as ethiopia. I enjoyed the challenge of playing Ethiopia earlier this year.
Could Hedjaz have been isolated in your market because they did not have any ports? That would explain why nothing from your market would reach them.
MORE! i luv it
Honestly like the Vic 3 content, keep it coming!
More Vicky please. Love these
If you made the agitator you got from the corn laws JE the leader of the landowners then you could've gotten tenant farmers or homesteading easily, as well as getting rid of traditionalism.
Decreasing government wages is usually a bad thing - you saved like 500 by paying them less, but losing -10% prestige put you down to Minor power and that came with extra costs from interest.
become a theocratic technocracy please
More Victoria 3
Here are some tips i wanna share:
- Dont build construction sectors untill you can afford 20 because you are wasting your money and not building what you want faster but slower. (So once you get 100 iron in your market and build 2 construction sectors set on iron)
- When you get journal for market liberal, give him leadership and enact homesteading instead of tenant farms. He will give you more success chance and no stall as leader instead of agitator. Also market liberals have the same opinion on tenant farms and homesteading.
- Market liberals also hates traditionalism, so you can get agrarianism or laissez-faire
- love your videos.
Random question, does the suez canal still not allow you to earn any money from others using it?
30:14
“A promote social mobility decree in Somaliland, alongside the violent suppression”
The sheer emotional dissonance of those words’ connotations is astounding
More more I need more please 😭😭😭
It’s nice to see a historical re-enactment of the founding of Wakanda 😂
love the Vic 3 videos
Please do a part two of this
"No UK". Ireland would be a much different place in this world.
6:00 you can make agitator a ruler of the intrest group by rightclicking on him, so then the landowners political power would also support the reforms and not only the movements the agitator starts
25:35 We will reform what country?
Would love to see more Vicky 3
I thought the enactment of tenant farmers was going to be stuck given the UI showing the enactment was paused and your illegitimate government. Forgot that political movements allow you to push laws anyway. Good to know.
Haha, when I clicked on the video I thought it was Civ6.
You did have corn laws, but not the market liberal landowner event? Or did I miss it.
You taught me more how to play Victoria 3 then the tutorial
Not having the game myself, but from watching your runs, and other streamers, would railroads open those markets?
@@ClockworkOuroborous Yes railroad helps in the country but you need ports to trade to other continents
What are the odds of a part two?
The attack bonus from the prince is so OP! wtf
Yay Vicky 3!!!!! Wooooooh!!!!
Pls add part two.
I don't know if this is locked behind a DLC, but you can grant leadership of a interest group to an agitator so you could have made that market liberal the leader of the landowners and enact tenant farmers, laissez fare and free trade easily.
I'm surprised he didn't make the corn laws guy the leader of the landowners.
Potato playing this is nice because I like the game's concept but to me it's an impossible game for aliens.
That escalated quick at the End
i have played multiple rounds in 1.7 and never managed to get rid of radicals, especially in conquest oriented rounds it seems to be a constant problem. I hope they will change radicals from standard of living to compare it to the regional average instead of solely look at the change.
Well it stands to reason you'll never make everyone happy (outside of late-ish game full communism setups but even those will have a few radicals), what really matters is exactly who those radicals are and support.
Do you ever get tired of people asking you to pick Terra Invicta back up?
This was a pretty classic example of what happens when you grow fast as a country with rubbish tech but lag on political reforms. Your growth stalls out, which prevents you from investing into tech, which means you miss out on growth from better production methods and ultimately fail to get the exponential growth you need to succeed when starting with such a big tech handicap. Sometimes it's better to grow more slowly since the more built up your states are, the stronger the useful IGs such as industrialists are. More reforms can be more important than more land.
p.s. your dudes wanted consumption-only taxation because 20% of your population was radicals, probably mostly from running v high taxes a lot but you also generated extra radicals by conquering territory when you already had high infamy
Comments help the algorithm so I comment on videos I like.
Same
Ditto!
Please please please do United tribes!!!! Tino Rangitiratanga!
More vic3 please!!!
More vic 3 content great game
You pronounce "petite bourgeoisie" like "petty bourgeoisie" lmao
Yaaay
he subsidieses buildings that cant hire staff because of general worker shortage. does this have any affect on more people becomming hired?
Also, later (35:12) he subsidies clipper production. the factory shows that input goods are cheap and output good is expensive, meaning the factory already is highly sentivised to satrt production as high as possible. does subsidisieng do anything in this case?
Subsidizing a building will force it to hire pops if they're available and cause already employed pops to jump over as well. Can be useful to subsidize a freshly built building for a few weeks to get it up and running faster which can be rather useful when it is part of a feedback loop (like Iron Mines and Tool Workshops).
i need ep 2 right now
Hey potato!
This is a little off-topic question but, What civilization packs should I have to make my gameplay better?
POTATO VICKY 3 LETS GOOO
I think you subsidize too much but there’s cuts so idk if you stop after they’re employed or what
Gonder calls for aid 😂
This game seems way too complex for me to figure out but it’s interesting to watch.
why didnt i get "outlaw Prince"? was it nerfed?
shoulda granted that market liberal landowner leadership of the party. Then the entire landowners would be ok with homesteading, instead of hoping.
Do you still have a discord?
They're supporting Consumption based tax, because they'd be taxed less
Did you call Gonder "Gondor"?
Why tenant farmers over homesteading, once you had the market liberal?
Colonizers hate that simple little trick!
it barely looks like you are playing the same game I played or watched other people play. how many windows, options, lists, tabs and mechanics this game has that I've never seem before ?
Love the Marxism simulator. Keep up the good work
Why is chile in Africa and why is blue?
Dang, potato playing Vic 3 with the skill like he invented the game meanwhile everyone is migrating away from my country and I'm 2k in the red on max taxes and minimum wages and I have no idea what happened to get there in the first place or how to fix it lol
I love how Potato got eaten up by Vic3’s bad game design. It’s such a struggle
Grant landowner leadership to the market liberal after the corn laws!
Should have secret police to suppress radical movement😂
Religious Ethiopia? Tati played too much CIV smh
bro really played like a potato by not granting leadership to the modern conservative.
pascifist is bar none the most annoying idealogy in the game.
imo Moderate is the more annoying one.
Oriental & Sunni religious is boring. ANIMIST Ethiopia is where it's at!
Chile wants to know your location