The Sony specs sheet shows 4K 17:9 as Super 35 cropped - 4096x2160 on a 8632x4856 sensor - so it's a massive crop not 1.07 crop - regardless of if you are at 25 or 50p. It would be fantastic if they could use the full sensor for 4k (through line skipping) but this is not the case) - the crop will be 2x plus.
@@YourStoryStudios I thought it was independent of codec - but I might be wrong - the massive crop to 4k and therefore 100fps is one of the main things putting me off the Burano. It would be great if it could shoot utilising the full 8k sensor (and therefore the full width of our full frame lenses) and oversample this into a 4k file ;)
@YourStoryStudios@@wesgreene9908In FF Crop 6K (1.07x) scan mode, you can shoot oversampled UHD, DCI 4k or HD when using XAVC-I with 60fps max. If you want HFR, 60+ fps, you have to use cropped S35 (2.25x from FF) and can use X-OCN LT or XAVC-I at 4K DCI. It less confusing once you understand how the different scan modes affect the recording formats.
It is interesting to note that X-OCN has a similar spread of data rates as ProRes on the Fuji X-H2, and unlike the VENICE, you don’t need to spend 4 grand each on the recording media (AXS). The BURRITO uses CFexpress B. I do expect to see X-OCN ‘raw’ on Sony’s mirrorless cameras eventually, like a future a7s IV, but they need to fucking get on with it as it has been around since 2016. Something mirrorless cameras have generously given the BURRITO in return for nothing back is IBIS, by the way. Yes, the BURRITO features IBIS, which Sony said was not possible to do with an internal ND filter. This gives me hope that we will be finally getting internal ND filters on our IBIS lumbered mirrorless cameras, and that Sony were simply lying.
@@jakebaine Ok.. So if you buy a camera that has absolutely no demand in your area, meaning one wants to rent it, or pay you a premium for bringing it on set for professional work, why would you say this is a bad take? Unless you're a wealthy hobbyist, there's no reason from a reasonable business standpoint to make the purchase. Please explain and justify your Bad take...
As an FX9 user, I got heavily burned with few updates and then came the FX6. No way I trust Sony to protect the investment I’d make in the Burrito.
Next gen FX6 will have similar specs and hardware (VND + IBIS) minus the 16-bit X-OCN codec. Probably less than 2 years.
That's what I'm hoping for!
The Sony specs sheet shows 4K 17:9 as Super 35 cropped - 4096x2160 on a 8632x4856 sensor - so it's a massive crop not 1.07 crop - regardless of if you are at 25 or 50p.
It would be fantastic if they could use the full sensor for 4k (through line skipping) but this is not the case) - the crop will be 2x plus.
Is that shooting RAW? I believe the 1.07 crop is when shooting XACV-I codecs. It is all a bit confusing.
@@YourStoryStudios I thought it was independent of codec - but I might be wrong - the massive crop to 4k and therefore 100fps is one of the main things putting me off the Burano. It would be great if it could shoot utilising the full 8k sensor (and therefore the full width of our full frame lenses) and oversample this into a 4k file ;)
@YourStoryStudios@@wesgreene9908In FF Crop 6K (1.07x) scan mode, you can shoot oversampled UHD, DCI 4k or HD when using XAVC-I with 60fps max. If you want HFR, 60+ fps, you have to use cropped S35 (2.25x from FF) and can use X-OCN LT or XAVC-I at 4K DCI.
It less confusing once you understand how the different scan modes affect the recording formats.
It is interesting to note that X-OCN has a similar spread of data rates as ProRes on the Fuji X-H2, and unlike the VENICE, you don’t need to spend 4 grand each on the recording media (AXS). The BURRITO uses CFexpress B. I do expect to see X-OCN ‘raw’ on Sony’s mirrorless cameras eventually, like a future a7s IV, but they need to fucking get on with it as it has been around since 2016. Something mirrorless cameras have generously given the BURRITO in return for nothing back is IBIS, by the way. Yes, the BURRITO features IBIS, which Sony said was not possible to do with an internal ND filter. This gives me hope that we will be finally getting internal ND filters on our IBIS lumbered mirrorless cameras, and that Sony were simply lying.
Does the XCON Codec include Lens Correction? It has noise reduction.
Thanks, great info. What was your impression of the build quality of the Burano? To me it looks as if it has the same coating as the fx6?
I honestly didn't pay too much attention to it!
@@YourStoryStudios But it didn't in anyway feel ""cheap",?...I mean 25.000 USD.
@@gerthenriksen8818 exactly!
any idea if this camera will do a 2K / S16mm?
I'm not 100% sure. It does shoot 1080p, no 1080i for broadcasters.
As of now S35 4k is the lowest resolution. Could possibly become a feature in a future firmware update.
I didn’t know the word “only” was pronounced “errnly” lol
The camera looks cool but I would still prefer the fx3 and a vnd.
Thernks fur wartching
The RONIN 4D been had ND FILTER built-in HUH
😂
The Ronin 4D is a gimbal/camera hybrid. It doesn't have IBIS.
Save your money. That Camera ain't going nowhere. Rent it out only if you need to, which for the type of work you currently have, it isn't necessary.
That does sound like wise advice... but who knows if I'll listen in a few months time ;)
Bad take.
@@jakebaine Ok.. So if you buy a camera that has absolutely no demand in your area, meaning one wants to rent it, or pay you a premium for bringing it on set for professional work, why would you say this is a bad take? Unless you're a wealthy hobbyist, there's no reason from a reasonable business standpoint to make the purchase. Please explain and justify your Bad take...
Useless to upgrade these days. In 6 months (literally) a mirrorless with same specs will be released.