Maududi on Jinnah after Independence 1947
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 вер 2024
- Maududi on Jinnah after Independence 1947
جماعت اسلامی ہفت روزہ ’کوثر ‘ 16 نومبر 1947 ء
”ہم اس تحریک کو آج بھی صحیح نہیں سمجھتے جس کے نتیجے میں پاکستان بنا ہے اور پاکستان کا اجتماعی نظام جن اصولوں پر قائم
ہو رہا ہے ان اصولوں کو اسلامی نقطہ نظر سے ہم کسی قدر و قیمت کا مستحق نہیں سمجھتے“۔
مولانا مودودی نے جماعت اسلامی (لاہور )کے اجتماع میں فرمایا۔
(بحوالہ روز نامہ انقلاب 9 اپریل 1948 ء)
”ہماری قوم نے اپنے لیڈروں کے انتخاب میں غلطی کی تھی اور اب یہ غلطی نمایاں ہو کر سامنے آگئی ہے۔ ہم چھ سال سے چیخ رہے تھے کہ محض نعروں کو نہ دیکھو بلکہ سیرت اور اخلاق کو بھی دیکھو۔ اس وقت لوگوں نے پروا نہ کی لیکن اب زمام کار ان لیڈروں کو سونپنے کے بعد ہر شخص پچھتا رہا ہے کہ واہگہ سے دہلی تک کا علاقہ اسلام کے نام سے خالی ہو چکا ہے“۔
ترجمان القرآن نے جون 1948ء کے اداریے میں لکھا ۔
”یہ عین وہی لوگ ہیں جو اپنی پوری سیاسی تحریک میں اپنی غلط سے غلط سرگرمیوں میں اسلام کو ساتھ ساتھ گھسیٹتے پھرے ہیں۔انہوں نے قرآن کی آیتوں اور حدیث کی روایتوں کو اپنی قوم پرستانہ کشمکش کے ہر مرحلے میں استعمال کیا ہے…. کسی ملک و قوم کی انتہائی بدقسمتی یہی ہو سکتی ہے کہ نااہل اور اخلاق باختہ قیادت اس کے اقتدار پر قابض ہو جائے“۔
اسی شمارے میں مزید فرمایا
” جونہی انگریز اور کانگرس کی باہمی کشمکش ختم ہوئی۔ تو اس قیادت عظمیٰ نے اپنے آپ کو ایسی حالت میں پایا جیسے اس کے پاﺅں تلے زمین نہ ہو۔ اب وہ مجبور ہو گئی کہ جو کچھ جن شرائط پر بھی طے ہو اسے غنیمت سمجھ کر قبول کر لیں۔ بنگال و پنجاب کی تقسیم اسے بے چون و چرا ماننی پڑی۔ سرحدوں کے تعین جیسے نازک مسئلے کو اس نے صرف ایک شخص کے فیصلے پر چھوڑ دیا۔ انتقال اختیارات کا وقت اور طریقہ بھی بلاتامل مان لیا۔ حالانکہ یہ تینوں امور صریح طور پر مسلمانوں کے حق میں مہلک تھے۔ انہی کی وجہ سے ایک کروڑ مسلمانوں پر تباہی نازل ہوئی اور انہی کی وجہ سے پاکستان کی عمارت روز اول ہی سے متزلزل بنیادوں پر اٹھی“۔
حمید نظامی نے 4 جولائی 1948ء کو نوائے وقت میں اداریہ لکھا
”ہم ان لوگوں کے حامی نہیں جو محض اپنی لیڈری چمکانے کے لیے شریعت کا نعرہ بلند کر رہے ہیں۔ …. (بہتر ہو گا کہ) شہر بہ شہر جلسوں میں قائداعظم کو گالیاں دینے اور سوقیانہ تقریروں میں وقت ضائع کرنے کی بجائے اسلامی نظام حکومت کا ایک خاکہ مرتب کیا جائے ۔“
مولانا مودودی نے ترجمان القرآن کے شمارہ جولائی 1948ءمیں لکھا۔
”مسلمانوں نے اپنی ساری قومی طاقت، ذرائع اور جملہ معاملات اس قیادت کے سپرد کر دیے جو ان کے قومی مسئلہ کو اس طرح حل کرنا چاہتی تھی۔ دس برس بعد اس کا پورا کارنامہ ہمارے سامنے ہے ۔ جو کچھ ہو چکا وہ تو ان مٹ ہے۔ البتہ اس پر بحث کرنا ضروری ہے کہ جو مسائل اب ہمیں درپیش ہیں ۔ کیا ان کے حل کے لیے بھی وہی قیادت موزوں ہے جو اس سے پہلے ہمارے قومی مسئلے کو اسی طرح حل کر چکی ہے۔ کیا اس کا کارنامہ یہی سفارش کرتا ہے کہ جو نازک مسائل ہمارے سر پر آ پڑے ہیں۔ جن کا بیشتر حصہ خود اسی قیادت کی کارفرمائیوں کے نتیجے میں پیدا ہوا ہے، انہیں حل کرنے کے لیے ہم اس پر اعتماد کریں“۔
اس کے جواب میں حمید نظامی نے 31جولائی 1948 ءکو اداریہ لکھا
”حضرت مولانا نے دس سال کے عرصے میں پہلی مرتبہ دل کی بات کھل کر کہی اور صاف لفظوں میں مسلمانوں سے کہا کہ محمد علی جناح کی جگہ مجھے قائداعظم مانا جائے۔ اب صرف اتنا کرم فرمائیں کہ مسلمانوں کو یہ بتا دیں کہ آپ کا ٹھوس سیاسی پروگرام کیا ہے…. اپنا پروگرام نہ بتانا اور نعروں سے مسلمانوں کا دل بہلانا یا قائداعظم کو احمق ، غلط کار اور دین میں ہلکا ثابت کرنے کی کوششوں میں لگے رہنا ہرگز آپ کے شایان شان نہیں۔ قائداعظم کا ریکارڈ قوم کے سامنے ہے۔ آپ کو ابھی قوم نے آزمانا ہے۔ آپ قائداعظم کو ہزار گالیاں دیجئے ۔ مسلمان آپ کے دست مبارک پر بیعت کرنے کے لیے تیار نہیں ہوں گے۔“
مولانا ابو اعلیٰ مودودی نے 9 اگست 1948ءکو جھنگ میں کہا
”لیگ کی جنگ کفر و اسلام کی جنگ نہیں تھی۔ مسلم لیگ نے اب تک یہ نہیں کہا کہ پاکستان کا خطہ اس لیے حاصل کیا جا رہا ہے کہ وہاں پر اسلامی خلافت چلائی جائے گی بلکہ یہ قومیت کی جنگ تھی۔ قومیت کی جنگ کو اسلام کی جنگ سے کوئی واسطہ نہیں۔ لیگ کی قراردادوں کا جائزہ لیجئے ۔ لیگ نے آج تک تسلیم نہیں کیا کہ پاکستان میں شریعت کا نفاذ ہو گا۔“۔
اس کے جواب میں نوائے وقت نے 18اگست 1948ء کو اداریہ سپرد قلم کیا ۔
”پاکستان میں آپ کو ایسے لوگ بھی مل جائیں گے جن کی تقریر و تحریر کا زور یہ ثابت کرنے پر صرف ہو رہا ہے کہ (مسلمانوں) کی اس مصیبت کی ذمہ داری قائداعظم کی لیڈرشپ پر عائد ہوتی ہے۔ قائداعظم نے پے در پے مہلک غلطیاں کیں اور مسلمانوں کو تباہی و بربادی کے اس غار میں لا پھینکا جس کا نام پاکستان ہے“۔
ایک ہفتے بعد 25اگست 1948ء کو نوائے وقت کے اداریے میں حمید نظامی نے لکھا ۔
”بظاہریہ جماعت کہتی ہے کہ ہم قائداعظم کے خلاف پراپیگنڈہ نہیں کر رہے ۔ لیکن معاف کیجئے یہ بیان صحیح نہیں ہے۔ مسلمانوں کی موجودہ قیادت کو مسلمانوں کی تباہی کا ذمہ دار ٹھہرانا دراصل قائداعظم اورصرف قائداعظم کی ذات ہی پر حملہ ہے“۔
Excerpts from essay by Wajahat Masood.
The main thesis of Dr Rehman is that Quide Azam wanted to make Pakistan a secular country not a theocracy. He is not discussing whether partition was good or bad, but he is clarifying that Quaid wanted a secular parliamentary system.
This is the key. Absolutely correct.
With due respect, Quaid e Azam himself was confused.
There is contradiction in his statements.
@@Taimur_Laal he would have succumbed to the islamists even if he intended to make a secular country in my humble opinion. He was conscious of his image among the Islamic orthodoxy. While he has his Parsi wife convert to islam, was not at all happy about his daughter marrying a non- Muslim. It reflects to me that although he was liberal in personal life he probably wanted to keep orthodoxy happy. Just a humble opinion
Lol. Even this thesis is not only historically but simply philosophically incorrect. I urge you to read the book ‘Pakistan Between Secularism and Islam’ by Tarik Jan published by IPS, Islamabad, to challenge your current views. For the truth seeker, only Quaid Address to the Bar Association Karachi is sufficient. Stop reading secularism into Quaid :)
Neither the propagators of Islamic governance demanded a “theocratic” form of governance since theocracy is itself not an Islamic concept. This is shoddy scholarship on the part of desperate secularists. If you equate Islamic governance to theocracy then I welcome you to study Islam and its history first.
Incredible. Sir you’ve opened up a new window for me to contemplate the ideological differences at the time of independence. Seems like I’ve found a new assignment for the next few days. Thank you sir I’m so gald I’ve found you❤️, it’s like I’ve truck gold.
One of the enthusiastic and rational person who has the ability to bring out the broken and hidden pieces of reality
Live longer Sir 🙏🏽
The imperialist was the British Raj but it is interesting to note that in Pakistan we are told that we got independence form Hindus and not from the British Raj.
Because the founder of Two-Nation Theory (Syed Ahmed Khan) was a British boot-licker.
No one ever said this to me... I don't know in which Pakistan do you live
@@azamcangame5253 Just read Pakistani textbooks especially the great Pak Study
@@azamcangame5253 Read the article ' Images of the 'other' in school textbooks and Islamic reading in Pakistan ' by Tariq Rahman.
@@azamcangame5253 All India Muslim League was a pro British and pro American party. Campain for Pakistan was done in UK. Quide Azam took oath of allegaince to the British monarchy when Pakistan became free
Exactly, Muslim league didn't want a country modeled upon Islamic Sharia but it was a battle for Nationalism or separate Identity which was partially Islamic.
May be but promise struggle to islamic Pakistan k naam pr kiya tha Pakistan ka mtlb kya lailaha illallah
Rhi baat minority rights ki islamic state minority ke religion me dakhal nhi deto muslim me dakhal deti hai like sood sharab zina homosexuality co education red light area movies dramas etc
Or jinnah ne jaan nhi di thi vo log the Jo islamic Pakistan k naam pr millions of people's shaheed hue millions of people apna ghar baar life paisa jameen sb chhoda
Secularism chahie tha partion q krdiya jisse muslim teen tukdo me bat gye isse na ki sirf Indian muslim ka blki Pakistani bangladeshi muslims ka bhi nuksan past se present tk brbad hogya dekhlo current Pakistan kya haal hai vo bhi sirf 1 saal Pakistan pr Raaz krne k lie really me nhi janta jinnah ka asal niyat ka tha but y disaster tha na islamic country bn pae na economy
بالکل درست باتیں کی تھیں مولانا مودودی رح نے۔
Sayyed Abul ala Maududi was right in this issue 💕💕💕💕
🌹🌹Respect & Regards from 🇮🇳 India for the courage & sincerity of journalism 👍🏼😎
Indeed he was right.... Syed political thought is usually misunderstood ♥️✌️
Allama Iqbal n Molana Modudi ki kitab al Jihad fil Islam k baare m frmaya tha k mustaqbil m ye kitab musalmano ki sar brahi kregi. Btw molana was 21 then. What a genius! His students like Dr israr and molana ishaq became the smartest of scholars from the east. Dr. Bilal Philips became muslims by ready molana. Wish i could meet him
Keep on doing this effort, best thing in your discourse is that you have been polite. No need to hope or desire early results.
Its pretty commonsensical. Pakistan movement was nationalistic not islamic. Islam does not support idea of nation-states. He was just being honest with his opinion which was influenced by his scholarship.
P.S: Hameed Nizami's counters were solid..
May be but promise struggle to islamic Pakistan k naam pr kiya tha Pakistan ka mtlb kya lailaha illallah
Rhi baat minority rights ki islamic state minority ke religion me dakhal nhi deto muslim me dakhal deti hai like sood sharab zina homosexuality co education red light area movies dramas etc
Or jinnah ne jaan nhi di thi vo log the Jo islamic Pakistan k naam pr millions of people's shaheed hue millions of people apna ghar baar life paisa jameen sb chhoda
Secularism chahie tha partion q krdiya jisse muslim teen tukdo me bat gye isse na ki sirf Indian muslim ka blki Pakistani bangladeshi muslims ka bhi nuksan past se present tk brbad hogya dekhlo current Pakistan kya haal hai vo bhi sirf 1 saal Pakistan pr Raaz krne k lie really me nhi janta jinnah ka asal niyat ka tha but y disaster tha na islamic country bn pae na economy
Great analysis, Doctor. 10/10 for taking out time to gather all the relevent excerpts.
Ye to bahut hi zabardast batey ki ti madudi Saheb ney. Even still we are confused to determine the purpose of Pakistan. Kash saro ne mukhalifat ki hoti ya sab Islam ko as nizam tasleem karney per mutafiq hotey.
very nice historical analysis
Sir u r excellent 💞
Dr Taimur sahib. I do want to point out that Jinnah and the Muslim League would never be fans or tolerant of Marxism or Socialism. The reason I say this is because, Muslim League was full of aristocrats and feudal lords (heck they wanted to maintain this system after the British left, whereas Congress wanted to eliminate it). Marxism and Socialism is a threat to feudalism. Correct me if I am wrong. It was Nehru who was more of a Socialist and was friends with Gamal Abdel Nasser and Yasser Arafat.
You were one of the very few people I used to listen and follow up in the left wing but this video made me realise that these quotes are out of context and you’re literally misguiding individuals with this. I’ve noticed alike before but this one’s too clear.
It’s better to read ‘Hameed Nizami’ Sahab yourself everyone and assess the terms and contexts he was relating to and was making with his replies and statements here. At other places too as our time is not the same and it’s very easy to misguide on contextual basis.
Ps: I’m not much supporter of JI and I’ve my differences but I couldn’t resist myself here writing down this comment as the video is misguiding.
Indeed the information provided is out of context, was hoping for better representation of facts :(
After reading about and of Maududi writings , conclusion is he was a perfect example of Tradionlist Muslims.
Jinnah was a practical , human being who tilt and accepted the Gods Concepts after understanding.
My Vote is for Jinnah
molana modudi was 100 percent right and now proved .
thanks for videos today.... i saw two videos of yours today.
Sir Aap ki videos buhat hain kaafi seekhnay ko mil raha hai. JazakAllah
ڈاکٹر صاحب، زندہ باد! خوش رہیں! آپکی کاوشیں انمول ہیں، جاری رکھیں! صد شکریہ
Thanks Sir
مودودی صاحب ایک اچھے انسان تھے، ان کی اپنی سیاسی رائے تھی جس سے متفق ہونا ضروری نہیں، علماء ہند پاکستان بننے کے مخالف ہی تھے، بچپن سے یہی سنتے آئے ہیں۔
Love the young look sir! Keep your hair young🙂🙂
Very enlightening
Dr Sahab Love from India🇮🇳
Moudidi had his own opinion regarding the partition. He was merely a human and liable to make false assumptions. Partition was an inevitable phenomenon that was bound to happen, sooner or later.
Jinnah bhi galat ho skte hai na like aaj halat Pakistan k bta rhe hai or promise struggle to islamic Pakistan k naam pr kiya tha Pakistan ka mtlb kya lailaha illallah
Rhi baat minority rights ki islamic state minority ke religion me dakhal nhi deto muslim me dakhal deti hai like sood sharab zina homosexuality co education red light area movies dramas etc
Or jinnah ne jaan nhi di thi vo log the Jo islamic Pakistan k naam pr millions of people's shaheed hue millions of people apna ghar baar life paisa jameen sb chhoda
Secularism chahie tha partion q krdiya jisse muslim teen tukdo me bat gye isse na ki sirf Indian muslim ka blki Pakistani bangladeshi muslims ka bhi nuksan past se present tk brbad hogya dekhlo current Pakistan kya haal hai vo bhi sirf 1 saal Pakistan pr Raaz krne k lie really me nhi janta jinnah ka asal niyat ka tha but y disaster tha na islamic country bn pae na economy
Well referenced talk.... this is how one should defend his argument.
زبردست
Excellent analysis
"My opinion may have changed, but not the Facts that I'm Right".
I think history proves that MAM was RIGHT!
Good sir taimur shb
Love u sir
Sir please aik pakistan ki political party's pr video bnao aur in parties k leder democratic hein ya nhi especially mian nawaz shref aur imran niazi aur ppp pr please
Well-done Brother Taimur Rehman.
Sir piz books recommendations pay AK video banay
مولانا کی بات درست ہے
Moududi was 💯 right.. current situations are proof..
Good job
Pehly 2 mints video mai di gaie hawaly se zahri tawr lgta hai k Mududi sahb Pakistan bnny k ni blky Muslim league k jumat k tareqa kar, qeyadt mai baaz anasir etc se ekhtlaf rakhty ty.
Any way as usual healthy and intellectual commentery though i m not agree
Keep it up Comrade
True 💗
In 1947, the Voting right was available only to rich ,landed and educated.
The Pakistan project was by the landlords for the landlords to save thier jaagirs / influence.
Not all muslims moved to Pak nor was the same encouraged by Jinnah post creation of Pak...he said (I belive) that those muslims who are left behind, must accept India as their country. Ofcourse, he realised that the land and resources that was Pakistan would not be able to take such large numbers.
Today Pakistan remains largely a feudal country...the only way of social mobilization is to join the army. No land reforms were undertaken post creation of Pakistan.
The commoners never voted then in 1947 and even today the vote has been denied it's due as the power remains with Elites and the Army Generals.
Typical propaganda of Indian liberal
You are right that only 14% of subcontinent Muslims voted but they represented/consulted 56%-76% of subcontinent Muslims. Not all Muslims voted for the unionist party, so you are wrong there.
They couldn't be moved because of Liaquat Nehru Pact, so you are wrong, they were forced to stay in India by Nehru. Pakistan got 25% of the land, close to 40% of resources of that time which was enough to take care of 25% of subcontinent Muslims and 5% of Dalits. It was India who was importing wheat, not Pakistan after the partition.
It was the commoners who moved to Pakistan more and they moved not to vote. Except first line everything is upside down.
@@vinamrasinghai2339 but there was no plebiscite for partition. It was provincial legislative councils that voted for members of central legislative members.
@@vinamrasinghai2339 how can you deduce it was the commoners who immigrated lol to immigrate you need resources both in the form of liquid assets as well as social capital. Those who didn't move look at their state of affairs now lol
@@vinamrasinghai2339
They consulted like the politicians today consult the people...lols....
The Nehru Liaquat Pact happened in 1950....
Neways by point is very simple.....
Pakistan is no country for commoners.....it was made by power hungry for the power hungry
Your opinions are always out of the box n worth listening.
Thank you 💜
Me fundamentalist ho or aj se pehly hamesha ye samajta rha ky pakistan religious maqasid ky liye hasil kiya gaya. Or un tamam logo ko jahil e mutliq samajta rha jo is ky bar aqas baat krty thy. Kiyo ky aj se pehly kisi ne explain ni kiya, hawaly ni diye.
U r an honest n learned man. have my respect....
بیشمار مُلا تھے جو پاکستان کو پلیتستان اور قائد اعظم کو کافر اعظم کہا کرتے تھے اب انکی اولادیں اپنے اجداد کے مشن کو پائتکمیل تھا پہنچانے میں رات دن مصروف ہیں اور کافی کامیاب بھی
اللہ تعالی انکے شر سے اس ملک کو بچائے اور اپکے اس بےنقاب کرنے کے مشن کو اللہ کامیابی عطا فرمائے
great taimoor bhai 👍
You has a right to disagree from JI but should not give your own meanings to someone article by choosing a piece of it. It’s called dishonesty.
The you are blaming is the author of a book with two volumes on the issue of Muslims of India and independence.
He presented the partition as one of the solutions in 1938, even before 1940.
Muslim league published his articles and distributed to counter the arguments of anti Pakistan lobbyists.
*taimur sir... please.. a video on your library tour.*
Hello prof, hope you are well. You speak about many issues that I'm very interested in but unfortunately I don't speak Urdu. I humbly request more English videos? I realise this may be inconvenient, but I hope that it's possible. Many thanks.
go to the taimur rahman -english channel its for english videos only
@@hyp3rtriton976 thank you I didn’t know there was an English channel.
Where are you from brother?
imran khan stopped all trade with india in 2019. now shehbaz wants to restart the trade. your views on this trade ban and revival of trade
Trade with India is good.
No one knows what it banned in the first place.
Boht khoob 👍
Balon ko color aye ustad e mohtram .
I love you sir 😘😘
Sir I complete agree with you
Sir please do a video log on Abul kalam azad
What was his views before death?
Make a video on that too :-).
I want to know that too
After 75 years , History proved Molana Maududi is Right , idk why Jamat e Islami is not taking proud of it 🤪🤪🤪😊😊
Really? You think we would be better off in Modi’s India? Hmmm.
@@Taimur_Laal why would there be Modi's India now then? If partition never happened do you really think that today's India would be the same India ?
@@Taimur_Laal میں سمجھتا ہوں کہ انہیں بھیجا گیا تھا لیکن یہ اپنے مقصد میں آج تک کامیاب نہیں ہو سکے
@@Taimur_Laal it's all about perspective. Citizens of big cities and few provinces are better off in Pakistan. Some of the other residents of other provinces would have been better off in united India.
@@Taimur_Laal Might be bcz in that case Muslims were no longer minority.
ویسے پروفیسر صاحب ایک ویڈیو اس موضوع پر بھی بناتے کہ بھارت کے کروڑوں مسلمانوں پر فاتحہ پڑھ کر آپکے قائد آعظم نے پاکستان بنایا کس لئے تھا؟
Ho ge ap k humaray ni hai..
تاکہ مسلمان آزادی ہوں۔ ہم کھلے عام جب چاہیں گائے کی قربانی کر سکتے ہیں لیکن انڈیا کے مسلمان ایسا کر کے دکھائیں!
Jiasy juttay apko India ma parh rhy ha 😂😛😀uskay sadybaab ky liay
@@UsmanAli-dp5pf آپ الگ نہیں ہوتے تو نہ ہمیں جوتے پڑتے اور نہ ہی بقول آپ کے وزیراعظم کے نہ آپ " بھیک منگےؓ" ہؤتے۔ دونوں کا فائدہ ہوتا نہ!!😃
@@ahmadkhatib6617 mtlb wo rooti k
Jo juttay kha kr milay wo thk ha bhooka rhny sy thk waisy, hr admi apny faislay krny k liy nai paida hota kuch doosrun ka khawab pura krny ki liy sirf indhan ka kaam deny k liy bi paida hotay ha 😂😛😀agr sb engineer bn jain tou phr mazdoori kon kry ga
Well sumup!
Is criticising Redcliffe commission award irrational ? ( even excluding the islamic narrative )
@Left's Progression I am merely questioning the way it was done. Done by a lawyer who had never set foot here earlier. The same done with a little less haste and by geographers might have been different, or better!
@Left's Progression maybe they did it this way on purpose
ونسٹن چرچل کی کتاب میں پشتون معاشرے کی منظر کشی کا حال. جیسے :
1- پشتون بسکٹ چائے میں بھگو کر کھاتے ہیں اور اسکا اصل لطف اٹھاتے ہیں ۔
2- شعر وشاعری عشق سے بھرپور ہے مگر معاشرے میں عملی عشق کی سزا موت ہے۔
3- اپنی محبوبہ سے عشق کرنے پر فخر کرتا ہے مگر اپنی بہن یا بیٹی کے عشق کو برداشت نہیں کرسکتے۔
4- موسیقی کو خوب انجوائے کرتے ہیں مگر موسیقی والوں کی عزت نہیں کرتے انہیں حقارت سے "ڈم" کہتے ہیں جو کہ
گالی کے برابر ہے.
5. پشتون زیارتوں پر ہر وقت حاضری دیتے رہتے ہیں اور اکثر اپنے بیمار بچوں کو دور دراز سے شفاء پانے کی خاطر ان زیارتوں پر لاتے ہیں.
In such a state of society, all property is held directly by main force. Every man is a soldier. Either he is the retainer of some khan.
تحریر امجد علی اُتمانخیل.
Moulana moududi was 100% right
It’s amazing what universe our Indian neighbors live in. As the saying goes, brother you see a speck in my eye, but ignore the log in yours. Watching the state of affairs of Muslims in present day India, I know where as a Muslim I’d like to be.
Well, the thing with Muslims ( some not all) is that they live in an us and them world.
The state of Muslims in India is that Mosques are not bombed.
They rule the film industry...( So many Pak actors might want to live in Pakistan but they want to work in India)
Same can be said about sports or education , medicine
Indian muslims have more visa free countries,
Kadyanis and Shias are not persecuted in India.
Indian muslims don't make videos of random girls in Turkey and get named and shamed.
Indian muslims are not named in the global terror lists ...they walk proud and confident on Indian passport
Jab tak communal chasma laga.kae rakhoge , you will live a.misreable life regardless of which country you live in.
Okay, so why never moved? What is the state of Jains in Pakistan?
Dude what sort of bs medieval mentality are you spouting?! India by all measures (socially/economically) is decades ahead of Pakistan and before talking about the status of minorities in India you should focus on the state of affairs of minorities in Pakistan? India has already had a few Muslim/Sikh/lower caste state leaders and respects multiculturalism to a large extent. Remind me, when was the last time a Hindu/Christian became President/PM of Pakistan? Oh right, your people killed or drove away most of them right after partition. Look at the state of your own country before commenting on India
Well we are also happy to see you in a separate country. What a coincidence!
سر ایک دن علامہ اقبال کے فلسفہ پر بھی مفصل ویڈیو بنائیں ۔۔۔۔ انکا فلسفہ بالکل بھی سمجھ نہیں آتا
I'm Secular but Molana Maududi was right woh sab sach bol rahy thei bohot hi ajeeb tarikey se partitionhui hai or bohot jaldi hui hai
To Moulana sath dety PML ka or theek kerwa dety sab kaam. dour dour bethy bas keeray nikalty rahy?
@@waqasome Bro ye un ka kam nai h na. politician jb mazhab ko bech m gusaen ge to mazhabi scholar bolega na k bhae is m niat mazhabi nai h. thats not his job to get into politics. He just replied to those who use the name of islam to gain audience even tho theres nothing islamic about it. I like Muhammad Ali Jinnah but obviously he was of secular mindset, to gain audience he had to use the chocolate of religion to attract people
@@MewNewPhysics This is total wrong. Islam and politics is side by side. Didnt Prophet Muhammad do politics when dealing with non-muslims and khufa continued the tradition.
@@waqasome Yes brother.. you are right.. islam and politics are side by side. What it means is that rulers or politicians or khalifah should make decisions according to shariah and obviously the ulema should guide them if they make mistake. Whats problematic in Quaid e Azam's(RA) case is that he was not interested in khilafah or islamic state, so Molana RA said it openly what Quaid actually wants, it made these seculars angry. Btw I like Molana so much, and also i like Quaid too. They both did good for muslims in their own ways. Dono hmare brhe hn
Pakistan was a mistake; it hurts to say this I’m also a Pakistani. But apart from Jinnah majority PML leaders were just landlords wanting to continue their power by getting a Separate country
Sir,
You quoted molana Madudi statement to prove that Pakistan was made for secularism.
But you ought to show statements of Qaid e Azam too,in which Qaid e Azam categorically said that pakistan a state, in which all rules and law of state will be as per islam.....
.
Show that too
Qaide Azam and his companions never wanted the radical Mullah shahi which we have today in Pakistan.Qaide Azam appointed sir Zafrullah Khan a Ahmadi his foreign Minister a Hindu his law minister and a Christian the first chief Justice of Pakistan.
Time proves that he was right.
Yes indeed he was right. Jinnah wanted a secular Pakistan. He was spot on right about that.
So can one draw a conclusion here that Muslim league used Islam only as a slogan/naara to invoke the sentiments in Muslims of India and fuel the separation movement?
yes we can, I mean After Quaid early death after partition. Muslim league didn't have honest, true leadership. 1959 was start of martial law where a Skindar mirza a civilain Ruler initiated martial law for his personal clinging to power
Apni library ka visit karway
Dr sahab Quide Azam also want a state where Muslim can live freely . So molana ..
Why Maududi Shb was chosen for delivering speeches from Radio Pakistan regarding Islamic System by Mr. Jinnah? The reality is that Jinnah wanted to get Pakistan, and Maududi was convincing the leadership of Muslim League, that the struggle would result in a Muslim majority state, and not an Islamic state. Mr. Jinnah told Maududi that he would struggle for a Muslim majority state the way he was struggling and then Maududi would strive for the Islamization of Pakistan. That was why, Maududi was highly honoured by Jinnah and he was assigned the task to deliver speeches from Radio Pakistan to make the masses aware of the true face and spirit of Islam.
Never Ever Maududi did abuse Mr. Jinnah, nor anybody else, he was not that kind of person.
I would suggest all to go through the writings of Maududi and then decide what is right and what is wrong?. Since, this person is the preacher of Marxism and Maududi struck at the very roots of Marxism by his appealing and convincing arguments, the criticism on Maududi by this person is, therefore, understandable.
Absolutely right you said mashalah
Sir voice in your videos is low. Please consider this problem in upcoming videos as your videos are valuable.
کبھی اس بات پر بھی ڈسکشن ہونی چاہیے کہ کمیونسٹ جب بھی اقتدار میں آتے ہیں تو انسانوں کا قتل عام کیوں کرتے ہیں؟
یہ اپنے رویے میں اتنے سفاک کیوں ہوتے ہیں؟
اور قیصر آحمد راجہ جیسی علمی شخصیت سے بحث سے فرار آپکو زیب نہیں دیتا
آپکے جواب کا انتظار رہے گا
مولانا مودودیؒ نے فرمایا:
“پاکستان ایک مسجد کی طرح ہے جسکی حفاظت ہمارا فرض ہے۔”
کتاب: تصریحات
اور ہاں ہم وطنی ریاستوں اور نیشنلزم کے خلاف ہیں کیونکہ پوری روئے زمین ہمارے اللہ کا وطن ہے۔
اس لئے روئے زمین پہ خلا ف ت قائم کرنا جماعت اسلامی کا مشن ہے۔
جب جناح کے بعد مودودی کی سنی گئی اور سیاسی جماعت بنائی تو کافی کچھ بدلہ اس نے اپنے خیالات میں
کتاب پڑھو سید ولی رضا کی مودودی کے بارے
ویسے بھی اسکے پاس تھا ہی کیا ہر بات کو مسجد اور مندر کے تناظر میں دیکھنے کے علاوہ
پاکستان مسجد تھا تو یرہ مسجد ٹوٹ گئی تھی ١٩٧١ میں جب یہ دولخت ہوا- جس میں جماعت اسلامی کا بہت بڑا رول تھا-
آپ مولانا مودودی کی تحریر میں یعنی "قائد اعظم" کا لفظ کیوں استعمال کر رہے ہیں؟؟ کیا یہ انٹلکچول بددیانتی نہیں ہے
❤️
Sir video about russia n Ukraine war.ple.
Sir, it's easy to fool a muslim. You just have to tell them that Islam is in danger and they will be ready to create chaos. Unfortunately their fear is lack of understanding of their own religion..
4:05 he looks like Dr Bhim rao amedkar.🤔
The unfortunate thing is we are an lslamic county and there is no sharia in Pakistan.
And we still today follow Anglo Saxon .
Only if we had focused on MOLANA Abdul Qalam azad and didn't got partitioned things would had much been messed up like today
Lol you are really dragging your self through mud here. You are wrongly interpreting his words and really making straw man arguments.
Please don't humiliate your self.
Moududi sahbs words are written not hidden.
why don't you pls correctly interpret his words then. Thanks.
If you were present in that time, would you support the creation of pakistan or not?
Absolutely not.
Yes we stood with jinnah.
despite hindutva and india being turn into a soviet style dictatorship. i might be opposing it because Muslims being in huge numbers in one country might be in better economic situation where all the recourse would be spending on development rather than proxy wars
@@islamandlondi8206 Didn't ask you but ok
یہ تو بالکل ٹھیک ھی کہہ رھے تھے۔۔
Plz make videos about political instability in pak
You are still presenting lines out of context from the literature of Molana Maududi, just check out the interview of Maualana on Radio Pakistan
ua-cam.com/video/W-2fPu2iIGM/v-deo.html
You need to understand the political philosophy presented by Maualana Maududi instead of beating the bushes.
Political philosophy of Mullah Maudoodi my foot
@@javedbutt6222 what a beautiful way to contradict, you need really to read him!\
@@baitcastingfish1417 Mullah Maudoodi is one of the founders of radical Islam in the subcontinent.
What is the solution of all these problems?
Mjy smgh nh ati riyasat ka aik mzhab hona q zrori h.aj tk Pakistan na riyasat ka mzhab rkh kr aj tk hasil kia kiya ha?
Kia bat ha madudi g ki
Matric pass thy bs
Na hi kisi madressah sy parhy thy
Ab kia kahon ma inko
In our Constitution it is clearly mentioned that no law will be made against the teaching of Islam - and it's say it all,
a system of Islam/sharia is the desired law of land period.
Your parlement start by reciting only Quran it is crystal clear and at then end it is the right of the people I'm land what they want to have as democracy say if majority wants to be secular then Pakistan will become secular and will change law and remove sharia point from constitution but if they want to adopt sharia then it's their right
So everyone has the right to preach his ideology and it's on Pakistan public to decide whom they want to vote and how they want to live
And history does not and will not dictate and debate is useless because with democracy it's now in public hand to decide what they want to be as a Muslim state or secular state
اس سلسلے میں پیش خدمت ہے ، تحریک اسلامی کے 29 سال، آڈیو مولانا ابوالاعلی مودودی۔google
کوئی بھی تحریر آڈیو کا نعم البدل نہیں۔
Dr Taimur's thesis is always lensed and sided. Just because Modudi accused the league secular doesn't necessarily make it one. What are you going to do about Jinnah's statements on Shariah allocation and an Islamic republic?
My point is Jinnah's vision is contradicting and diverse, because of which everyone cherry picks and utilize for their agendas.
I'm not here to support Jamiat or Modudi even I want secularism but at least bring the whole picture, such kind of dishonest analysis is keeping our society unprogressive. Jinnah used Islam and secularism both to beg Pakistan and that's a reality just live with it.
Why you did not mention what molana madudu R.A says in 1955 when pakistan become islamic. Hypocrisy of a libral
Good job for bringing it up....i think maududi vision is correct otherwise things would not have been favorable for the British under khalifat.
Hameed Nimazi k jawab say pata chalta hai k Quaid Islam say mohabbat karny waly thy
Professor u r absolutely Wrong in your calculation... Agar sarmayakar zakat day ya vadera zakat ushar day to gurbat Khatam hojaye gi... Calculation kar kay dekho ....
with respect, is this video for Jamat-e-Islami fans? Everyone has political views so did he. What's the point for us general public Sir jee?
Jamaat e islami s actions over 70 years speak louder than words just visit punjab university in lahore and you will see what i mean say no more
Don't spread negative narrative sitting in Air conditioned room. Pakistan is blessing of Allah Almighty For your kind information sir Pakistan is only the state which was born on Islam. We should elaborate history how Pakistan's founder face too much difficulties rather than to pay tribute in form of useless criticism
What difficulties did they face?
Molana Modudi has some valid points though. Muslim league had a lot of opportunist lotas then!
I found my self agreeing with him!
What’s is point? People who think Making Pakistan was a bad decision they should move to India so poor Indian Muslims can migrate to Pakistan.
Moulana,s decision was a political decision.
وہی میں کہ رہا ہوں ۔ اگر پاکستان نہیں بنتا تو بھارت میں مسلمان اچھے حال میں ہوتے
ویسے بھی آپلوگ وہاں کچھ کر تو سکے نہیں ۔ کیا آپکے شریفوں اور زرداریوں سے بہتر سونیا لالو ممتا اور اویسی نہیں ہیں ؟
@@ahmadkhatib6617 wow. Wo kase achay halat mein hote. Balke ab pakistan mein jo kuch muslim bach jaye gae agar waha hute tu sab mare jate.