New York Enacts Ridiculous New Gun Laws In Response To Supreme Court Ruling
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 лип 2022
- NYSRPA v. Bruen Response
shop.mrcolionnoir.com/
In response to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that determined sections of New York's concealed carry statute were unconstitutional, Democrats in the New York State Legislature on Friday passed a slew of new restrictions affecting legal gun owners.
There is an extensive list of hurdles including having applicants disclose their current and past social media accounts so the licensing officer could review them to see if anything the applicant may have posted would, in the mind of the licensing officer, be objectionable and disqualify the applicant.
If an applicant clears all of the hurdles involved in obtaining a concealed carry permit, they would have to be aware of an extensive list of places where it would still be illegal for them to be armed.
They include government buildings, schools, colleges and universities, medical facilities, churches, libraries, and entertainment venues such as libraries, theaters, arenas, and stadiums.
Legal gun owners with concealed carry permits would also be prohibited from carrying in a park, on a playground, at a polling place, at a parade or a protest, or while using public transit.
They also could not carry while in a bar, or even in a restaurant that serves alcohol.
In fact, under the new laws, they couldn't enter any private business or property with a legally registered gun, unless that business or property owner posted a sign which says they can. And even if they mistakenly carry someplace they shouldn't, they could be charged with a felony where, if convicted, they would lose their constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
While it's long been established in the state's law that a felony record bars an individual from legally purchasing or processing a firearm, the new law would add several misdemeanors to the category of infractions that would disqualify an individual from owning a gun.
This isn't even all of it!
These people are not trying to protect you they're trying to control you and protect their power.
New Leather Patch I am The Militia Hats
➡️ shop.mrcolionnoir.com/collect...
I Am the Militia
➡️ bit.ly/2nAD7sF
IYKYK The Second Amendment Merchandise
➡️ bit.ly/3l0EhYZ
Join MY Exclusive Text List Focusing on 2A Advocacy and News while automatically being entered in our monthly LifePods & PRO 2A Giveaways
➡️ bit.ly/3FFLHJi
If I Only Had One Concealed Carry - FREE Book
➡️ www.mrcolionnoir.com/start-here/
To Order Your PRO 2A Hats Click Here:
➡️ shop.mrcolionnoir.com/collect...
Help US Further our Pro Constitution, Pro 2A message:
www.MrColionNoir.com/donate/
For Concealed Carry Insurance mentioned in the video click here:
www.mrcolionnoir.com/go/uscca/
FOLLOW ME ON:
Twitter - / mrcolionnoir
Instagram - / colionnoir
Facebook - / colionnoir
#2ANews #ColionNoir - Розваги
Supreme Court: "You can't infringe on gun rights."
New York: "You know what? I'm gonna infringe even harder."
The fact that those states like NY and California will not obey the Constitution, the Law of the Land. Just makes them not part of America anymore and must be forced out of the Union.
The tyrant needs to go
Yeah but 1/6 ?
Steering wheel?
Bombshell testimony?
Ahhh just comply with the liberal world order ya peasants!!
They said they don't care. They then said they'll "comply." And of course NY being NY decided to come back and literally f*** all of us in anger. And of course NY being NY as always, finds a way to make money off of it. Make the process lengthy and expensive.
@@chris-dd6uq It’s okay, it only applies if you actually follow that crap. I’ve already been to prison and don’t have a great track record of compliance for “laws” 😂 oh but the law abiders see these people commit open felonies which they skate on and still actually follow their crap 🤣
Hearing her say “I don’t need to have numbers” is probably the most infuriating statement I’ve heard all year
Because it's not about protection, it's about power. So really, she's right.. Until New Yorkers decide to make her wrong anyway.
Don’t forget last years most infuriating comment by mr terminator Arnold climate change hypocrite always driving a huge suv..” screw your freedom”
Can't lie that way
Indeed
That was the only word I could think as well.
🗣️INFURIATING ! ! !
Why can't the supreme court issue arrest warrants for these politicians who violate the courts orders?
She’s a Tyrant & deserves exactly what tyrants will get.
EXACTLY WHEN TYRANNY BECOME LAW REBELLION BECOME DUTY
“This has nothing to do with lawful gun owners…”, says the unelected NY governor as she greatly restricts legal gun owners.
And it protected by gun owners privileged by their office.
How much you want to bed she has a little high end, subcompact, hammer fired pistol locked up in her house she fantasizes she can get to if someone breaks in?
@DefenderofPoodles: All gun control laws do is restrict the rights of law abiding gun owners. Criminals don't obey laws.
Sorta like them saying for the past 20+ years, "We are not coming for your guns, we just want more safe laws".
As interim governor she should not have any authority to pass laws until she is duly elected
I REALLY don’t like that you have to put names of friends and family on a list to obtain a tool of self defense. I think there’s potential there for a lot of abuses of that information to occur.
Every day these politicians prove more and more why it’s important for citizens to own guns.
And the citizens of NYC need to storm the offices of the demo/rino politicians and use those firearms!
Every day these mass shootings prove why it's more and more important for citizens not to own guns
Amen
More like, "now we see why this current gov't is 100% obsolete, & in line to be dissolved forthwith!"
Eventually we’re going to need the to defend our selves from tyranny
isnt blocking you from carrying in public places also unconstitutional?
I live in NY (not the city). I've been around firearms my whole life. Multiple members of my family have been or are in law enforcement. I served in Iraq. I probably have more experience with firearms than over half the police in this state. Now they want to make me the bad guy by tying my hands behind my back for wanting to protect myself and my family
Get out of NY! I see it as a foreign nation at this point.
@@seanld444 unfortunately easier said than done, a lot of us have businesses here or at the very least have jobs we can't easily leave. It's a shame we can't live our lives like normal Americans
If you not from the city you not from ny be foreal for a moment
@@TimmyWells-fs8pqexcept the rules they make effect us in Upstate.
What I don’t understand is how these states can defy a supreme court’s ruling. If I where to defy a court order I would be in jail
It's called the great reset New world Order attitude
These states are calling the 2nd amendment's bluff.
Exactly.
Democrats don't follow laws, They create them for their benefit and ignore everything else, and no one does anything about it.
Are you new here? Politicians have been thumbing their noses at the constitution for decades.
“The people must remain ever vigilant against tyrants masquerading as public servants.”
-George Washington
Quoting shit from 250 years ago isn’t helping unless the people help themselves.
@@blackkaiser5653 Stop being so pessimistic!
@@blackkaiser5653 Actually it's a good to remember human nature has always been a factor.
@@blackkaiser5653 pissing on meaningful quotes from 250 years ago isn’t helping
Remember folks they do this crap to not only empower themselves. They do this crap to divide us. Ignoring history only makes us repeat it. When/if crap hits the fan we need to be behind the fan and not in front. Slowly our politicians are turning back the hands of time.
There are two ways to possibly make this stop:
A) Arrest the offending parties. Yes, arrest the NY Governor for contempt, as well as ALL of the cronies who VOTED for said laws. The US Marshals need to be given direct orders to perform this duty.
B) The Thomas Jefferson Rule gets enacted if Plan A) isn't effective.
End of story.
When Trump get in he better arrest these tyrants Asap!
“I am the militia. The militia is there to stop someone threatening the sovereignty of your personal state.” Beautifully articulated!
She literally admitted that she doesn't care about our 2nd amendment right when she said she doesn't need the data. Ridiculous. So glad i don't live in New York or California
Ya but if they can do it in NY or CA they can do it anywhere since it's still the United States. They are literally testing America at its core like dropping bombs on its perimeter while marching in towards the heart of it. This type of governing will spread like a disease in time so we all need to protest it vigorously
Ny is one step up they have to retreat when a robber breaks in California if someone breaks in you could shoot them no questions asked as long as your a legal gun owner
Demorats don't care about the constitution.
Move!
Me too. I live in the south.
For those of you in NY...Your Governor just told the World she doesn't need factual evidence as a basis for laws that will infringe on your Constitutional Rights.
She simply has to WANT to do it because she CAN. Please vote this woman out post haste.
The worst part is that she was never even voted in. Cuomo was so grossly incompetent and perverted that she was appointed to take his place. New yorkers had no say in this tyrants coming to power, talk about feeling helpless, I'm ashamed that I was born in this place.
The next won't be any better. The left owns New York.
We are trying to. Lee Zeldin is running for governer in an effort to return this state to a normal place.
Problem is even if she is booted from office none the other candidates are not much better
She is just continuing the legacy of NY governance of the past 30 years at this point incompetence, corruption and tyrannical tendencies
Lee zelden! Let’s gooo!!!
So how exactly is limiting legal gun ownership going to decrease gun violence by criminals?
You're absolutely correct 8 months they have my application and no word back yet redictulas
Has nothing to do with guns; it has everything to do with POWER!
Also with money, because that’s often the biggest hurdle for the average law abiding citizen to overcome when trying to protect yourself and your loved ones.
Even worse, it's about the corrupt retaining and gaining MORE power.
More like the 2a was specifically designed for politicians like we have now. That's why they're actually "scared" of guns
The left accepts nothing that goes against what they want done. They immediately begin working against laws, handed down, to ignore them and make their own rules. No wonder they support criminal lawlessness.
Gun control is about control
Supreme Court: "No more using subjective criteria to determine if someone has a need to carry a firearm"
New York: "Ok, let's introduce a subjective criteria to determine if someone is of sound mental capacity to carry"
If you live in NY, you're out of your mind and shouldn't be allowed to carry!
California did the same thing
How do they separate PHI to demand your own rights? This will be just another lawsuit and the state wasting much much more money
New York knows nothing is going to happen to them. If they get sued they just use tax payer money to pay for it, government is on their side so no concern from that. The shee.... I mean people aren't going to do anything so no problem from that either. They literally have no reason not to continue shitting on the 2A.
as long as there are cowards raising their hand and jumping up and down screaming "im a law abiding ignorant coward". politicians will control those sheep
"It's all about controlling you and them staying in power!" A very true statement.
Dude, you have the most perfect conception of what is going on in N.Y. I have ever seen. Thank you, sir, for telling these idiots where we, the taxpayers of N.Y., stand. Keep on keeping on, my friend!
“This has nothing to do with lawful gun owners” -Sincerely, Governor Fuckhead
Me: Well who the hell else does it have to do with? Criminals don’t give a shit you made things more difficult cause at the end of the day they will do what they want.
And you can bet they will never enforce their own laws against the criminal element.
never believe a person who's top lip never moves when they talk.
She's cut from the same cloth as Pelosi,
Perhaps an earlier version of a clone
Disarmament of the population.
She's the reason in some aspects, abortion should be legal...
SCOTUS needs to make “Constitutional Carry” the law nationwide.
The have.
It was in its inception, the 2nd ammendment.
They did.
But as long as politics is fueled by conflict rather than solution, and as long as politicians can continue to pass "new" laws (essentially old laws with rewording) to ensure their regular control remains, we're not going to see any alteration. Its a circular fight until you remove that particular "power" from the system. A decision by SCOTUS establishes precedent and removes such laws, and their future iterations PERMANENTLY. But you also have to enforce it by non-compliance.
That's how WE would counter illegal gun laws. Either do what the SCOTUS and the law says or Constitutional Carry would kick in automatically!!!
SCOTUS doesn't make laws. And there is already a law in place, the 2nd Amendment.
Moved to Wisconsin , got my CCW in 8 days. I’m also prior service which helped me out . In New York it’s like being in a prison. Good riddance .
Wow “I don’t have to prove anything” just wow
The Second Amendment Does Not Grant Us The Right To Bear Arms.
The Second Amendment Denies The Government, The AUTHORITY To Infringe Upon Our Right To Bear Arms.
That's a fact
and reminds us that we always have had 😁😁
Exactly. The right to bear arms is a natural right and pre exists government.
The "people" in the 2A are the same ones mentioned in the preamble and the 1A.
Well said
“I have a responsibility for the safety of the citizens of New York.” Yet the courts have already proven the police are not there to protect people. So who, exactly, is she expecting to protect the people??
They aren't convicting 100% of criminals that break the gun laws, but I bet they will have an 100% rate against people with a CCW who go into the wrong store
Maybe we could hire professionals and pay them in home cooked meals and a room of their own.
(sarc.)
Herself and her power base.
the point is to kill you
yes, you, me, all of us, with restrictions and regulations
More guns, more gun violence. A young woman was just murdered point-blank by her estranged boyfriend. And you want MORE concealed guns!?
She needs to be thrown out according to our Articles for not keeping her oath of office and the Constitution and by circumventing the Supreme Court ruling. All that should be challenged yet again.
AMEN, AMEN, PREACH IT.....ITS FACTS.... UNBELIEVABLE! For the older misses and gentlemen that have been watching these politics, we are seeing it. 👊
When a PUBLIC SERVANT says things like "I don't need to..." when asked about giving justification to the public, it should be an automatic disqualification to hold that office...sou.ds very tyrannical to me when they think their authority gives them absolute power.
Should be but NY will vote her right in anyway; then proceeed to put their masks back on and head for their 3rd booster per her diktat.
If she gets elected they should not even give th e pretense of swearing on a bible or upholding the Constitution. It is in direct contrast to the sworn allegiances they have already made to other entities. Entities that have been clear as to their Constitution repeal and replacement objectives.
That's what these democratic DiCKTATORS are doing all over this country. In my State, the people voted in the Death Penalty. WE decided the law. Newsome flat out said, nope, I do not believe in it so....That should be automatic grounds for removal as you are going against the very will of the people and the laws in which were created. But alas, it's the right that is destroying Democracy.
If the government tells you you don't need a gun, you need as many guns as you can get your hands on.
@@bwofficial1776 if the government is attemptong to disarm the population it is because it intends to assault them.
They are literally seeking to repeal and replace a social contract that others have already agreed to. Tere is already a Consitutional process if such a change is desired by the population. Requires the 2/3 of states prescribed in that contract.
The contract no longer applies? Then no one is bound to any terms not agreed upon.
Only domestic enemies would even seek to push the population to lay down to be sacked.
Couldn’t agree more 👍🏼🇺🇸
New Yorkers and other Dem state movers please remember.. When you leave your state, don't vote to make your new state exactly like your old one!! You left for a reason!!
@FSU Seminoles Please remind them of why they left
@FSU Seminoles Miamian here, they all over South Florida with their libby lefty mentality 🙄
I am willing to bet some of them will bring their crappy voting to the new places they relocate (In which they were fleeing from), they just can't help it and see a D by the name and vote. They don't get it, it's instilled in them to be a Democrat regardless.
This just makes it perfectly clear the type of person that she is. She took the same oath that I took to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States . well we all see how that's going .I can only hope that her replacement will stand up to tyranny and help us return to the United States that we love.
The Governor made a mistake by dismissing the necessity to know and provide evidence based data concerning this matter. I’m very disappointed.
“Can you prove that this man killed that other man?”
“I don’t need proof. I just know”
Essentially, that’s what she said.
Exactly...that was ridiculous how someone in power says that, and then stays in power...those of us on the right are getting closer and closer to the breaking point...something's gonna tip it over
This is what happens when there's no consequences for their actions because they think they're all above the law. We're literally seeing these politicians tell us 2 + 2 = 5 and we have one half that knows it's wrong and the other half agreeing it's right.
@@dontbeakaren6145 I'd say it's one third believes it, one third knows it's wrong, and some amount of the remaining third are just plain evil with whatever is left are wishy washy and decide how to vote on a whim.
@@Mike_Jones68 100% of registered voting republicans need to show up at primaries to replace RINO’s, and the general election to replace all the incumbent democrats.
And the People be like "Understandable. Have a nice day."
"Has nothing to do with lawful gun owners" is hard to say, when laws literally only impact those that abide by laws to begin with.
The amount of cognitive dissonance in this woman is stunning😠
I will not comply 🤷🏻♂️
ikr? Justin Trudeau said something similar, lol
Like all the roe vs wade reeeeeeee said i will not comply
If people accept it then it’s too late to free NYS.
Wondering if these “new laws” mean that the govern’s security detail has to leave their guns in there vehicle when the governor has to into a government building or other gun restrictive places, or do these “new laws” only apply to the little people? 🤔 let’s go Brandon!!!
How long does it before we can vote her out of office.
When a politician says " I don't need numbers " that's the line of a dictator!
With this new law:
If you happen to walk past a group of people who are protesting while you're carrying a gun, you are suddenly committing a felony, even if you had nothing to do with the protest.
If you cut through a public park so you can get home faster, you are committing a felony.
If you walk into a Burger King just to get some takeout, and there is not an explicitly stated "guns welcome" sign posted on the front door, you are committing a felony.
If you pick up your drunk friend from a bar to take him home safely, you are committing a felony, even if you don't have anything to drink.
If you take a wrong turn in Manhattan and set foot on the edge of Times Square, you are committing a felony.
If you go to the library to drop off an overdue book, you are committing a felony.
If you go and vote, you are committing a felony.
How in the actual fuck can anybody look at this absurd law and genuinely believe that this is even the slightest bit reasonable?
Only a felony if you get caught. And someone sees your "concealed" weapon
@@bestever7151 than at that point why even bother with a permit?
Only a felony if there's men in blue that enforce it. From what I hear most are giving a middle finger to the UN-ELECTED POS in Albany.
@@bestever7151 and when something happens and you use it to defend yourself, you're guilty of a felony. See the problem?
Some of those places were already on that list. Any state or federal building, especially a court or anywhere where prisoners may be present for a hearing. Polling places have historically been on those lists. But, you are right. Go anywhere where it's not posted, and you run the risk of committing a felony. But, as Best Ever says, "only if you get caught." Best solution? Move out of NY.
True story based on not having guns in a federal building. I was going into Denver to renew my Security Badge. The office is in a state building where courts are. No guns, I already knew that. Parked my truck around the corner, not very far. I was doing this while a supervisor was covering my shift long enough to appear at the office and do my thing. I left the gun in my truck and holster on my belt. Left minimal stuff in my pockets to get through security without taking too much time. Security guard at the door tells me I can't wear the holster. Why? Because someone might slip a gun in there.
Ein minuten, bitte! I'm supposed to have confidence in your ability to perform security by you telling me I can't have an empty holster because someone might get a gun past you and put it in my holster?
New Yorkers and Californians need to seriously scrutinize those who run for office and hold them to a very high and professional standard. The governor dismissed a question with "I don't need the numbers".? If the people of New York are asking for the numbers, you need the numbers.
Mr. Noir, God bless you! You should be president of the nra or a senator, governor etc.
Law gets overturned and then they double down on making them even more difficult. Can someone forward this back to Supreme Court so they can knock this down immediately.
LOL, and how would the Supreme Court enforce that? Wake up!
@@davek5027 so whats your plan?
@@brownass2 more lawsuits
@@brownass2 My plan is to continue doing as I please while I laugh my ass off at all the law abiders 😂. People are so scared of prison they’ll live their entire lives with their tail between their legs. The only free men are criminals, ironically criminals founded the nation.
Open violation of SUPREME Court rulings! The court only has power IF the States abide by the decisions. To my knowledge I don't know what the consequences are for States ignoring the rule of law that they don't agree with. The Maryland AG said plainly, they will not abide by the ruling!!!!
Our system is dissolving. get to a State that aligns with your values because things WILL hit the fan. There will be free States and tyrannical States setting up autonomy. We are seeing States on both side doing whatever THEY want.
“ Proper Cause “ to me means being able to protect myself and my family. But in NY, only criminals are allowed to carry firearms.
Right?
Only the famous or wealthy and those with connections are only allowed to carry a weapon in new york.
Exactly. Unfortunately only criminals who don’t care about laws are able to carry guns. This is how blue cities are run.
Then become a criminal, you know like your forefathers were lol. That’s the idea of being a free man.
Proper cause to me is the 2A. Honestly even though I know I'd be denied. I'd love to move to California or NY for a week just to apply for a CCW and put as the proper cause "The 2A, shall not be infridged dickheads". Then move back to my free state of Utah.
Bet lawsuits will begin, need to sue these people in office to get them out of office.
I wouldn't want to own a gun either after hearing that. She's lying about it's not about the gun owners.. obviously blatantly lying. It's not about the gun owners but we're making it very hard for you. She needs to be thrown out for not keeping her oath of office and the Constitution.
I’m done doing this the lawful way. We need to recall and overthrow every single politician that breaks their oath
I’ve been saying tarring and feathering of bullshit elected folks needs to come back into vogue for a long time!
So basically 99.9% of them
@@microsoftpain Correct lol.
TERM LIMITS and downsizing the Federal government.
Unfortunately NY has no option for a statewide recall election- Hochul is running for a full term this year; our only option is to vote her out. Unfortunately she won her primary; the Republican candidate is a RINO; NY needs a good leader, and the Libertarian candidate is the only sane one running.
Her: "I don't need to have numbers."
Constitution: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Me: "I don't need to comply."
And it’s little comments like these (which I totally agree with btw) that they will find as “disqualifying” on your social media accounts.
@@JonathanGrandt Bingo! Infringes on 1st, 2nd, 4th and 14th Amendments.
Free men do not ask for permission.
But felons aren't people..
What's the point of the 2A? It seems Americans don't know.
The Supreme Court needs to grow some bigger balls and finally state that ALL requirements, restrictions and rules violate the 2nd Amendment. Good job on your video. Keep up the fight.
Eventually, this will happen. But it will take many years, many court cases and a hell of a lot of money.....much of which will line Democrat pockets and that's the point, yes?
Exactly
Notta, going to happen.
We need to disarm and defund the licensing authorities.
This is what I believe is referred to as “shifting the goalposts”.
Then again, isn’t one of their reps throwing the idea of dissolving SCOTUS around?
One rep? More like all of em..
Yep they’re wanting to take their ball & go home
There are a multitude of reasons to abolish the supreme court, but abolishing it over their rather uncontroversial ruling on gun rights is not one of them.
Shifting the goalposts? More like changing all the “rules” and the name of the game.
@@ameliam7898 while that is a childish behavior, there's another thing the Democrats can do without abolishing the supreme court: expand it! This is literally how FDR got the supreme court to go along with his new deal and other policies by threatening to expand the supreme court to get what he and the democratic party at the time wanted.
From a Canadian fight for your freedoms America don’t let them take your safety and security we Canadians have no right to self-defence and are currently controlled by a dictator
Yep. Thanks for the reminder.
At least it's in our Constitution whereas I believe the Canadian version does not...
It would take a Constitutional Convention of States to amend the Constitution and that isn't going to happen in my lifetime..
Ya u spit that truth !!
@@aaronbode9622 Not good!!
Americans will arm you. Just be sure to reciprocate when 1776pt 2 takes place
When I was a young NY and CA were the places to be. As an adult you couldn’t pay me to visit either state.
One thing I hate about people saying “only police should have guns” is that I work armed security. I’m in dangerous places , being paid minimum wage to protect people with my life. So do those people believe that I shouldn’t be armed since I’m not a cop? Or hell. Let me make this argument. Do you think the people who are victims or assault or home invasions or violent incidents are happy they didn’t have a gun? Do you think their families are just so over joyed that their loved one didn’t have a firearm to protect themselves with?
There comes a time when the court is going to have to start issuing bench warrants for contempt for public officials who knowingly violate a court ruling.
Prison time for public officials who knowingly violate the constitution. Definitely needed.
@@anon_y_mousse Based on what "legal expertise" do you make that assertion? I've already pointed out that Constitutions are deliberately general, and that Constitutional provisions are implemented by means of statutes. Perhaps you should inform yourself of the actual statutes, instead of getting all up in hysterical "arms" by being drunk on the smell of someone's else's cork.
@@jnagarya519 It's not based on current law, it's what I want to happen and my prediction for the result. Surely you understand how that works?
@@anon_y_mousse which said public officials are sworn to protect and defend
@@jnagarya519 nothing in the Bill of Rights is intentionally vague. The are VERY explicit in their language. The fact that politicians and judges have ignored the explicit language, simply shows how tyranny can creep into my government, regardless of the language of the Constitution.
"Legal gun owners, we're protecting you". That is what they call an abusive and toxic relationship.
And 4 references and SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS? Can you say "unconstitutional"? What don't they understand about the Bill of Rights? Yes, these are rhetorical questions. Just insanity.
The state of New York is going to judge people based on their (social media accounts) First Amendment rights, to determine their 2nd amendment rights. People watch more rights eroded, and controlled by the state government.
@@richardkitchens8707 Well put 👍👍👍
Yeah….I’m glad I live in Texas. This is absolutely insane, I could not stop shaking my head throughout the listing of restrictions in NY.
Damn bro... I feel your anger and frustration at being directly powerless. Keep fighting the good fight.
"I have a responsibility to the people of this state, to have sensible gun laws."
How can someone know what is sensible and what isn't if you don't have or care about the numbers?
He made a great point in the video. "How can you keep people safe if you don't know where the danger is coming from?"
Many people just want to "feel" safe! The same people bought all the hype about the vaccines without doing a cost/benefit analysis for their own situation and they are the same people who are terrified of being around electrical wires or components even though many people work on those every day. These are irrational people. A rational person would learn the numbers, pros/cons, or how something works and how to stay safe when working around it. People assume rather than learn or ask. Then there are the people who have bad intentions or who are brainwashed. Reality doesn't matter to them, as long as they get the results they want.
She took an oath to uphold the constitution.
Everything after that is void
The State SHALL ISSUE AR-15 to all lawful citizens above Age 21, and provide 2 weeks of free training in it's use, cleaning and care.
- That's sensible, when every lawful citizen has the ability to defend themselves as well as the constitutional right to defend themselves, the whole state would be safer. And criminals will leave a state that is armed to the teeth.
AMERICA: ''Every Man A Rifleman.'' and all the women too ! :-)
freecking-A at least lie to them about the numbers or tell some bullshit anecdotes , I think they believe they are being tuff when they let the mask slip like she did , when in reality it shows their weakness and incompetence. Be happy(but never complacent) bois we are making them squirm!
Suzanna Hupp is quoted as having said, "How a politician stands on the Second Amendment tells you how he or she views you as an individual... as a trustworthy and productive citizen, or as part of an unruly crowd that needs to be lorded over, controlled, supervised, and taken care of."
Well put. That b🐩h!!!
I like that quote.
she started to go for the feels then the masked slipped and she said screw the charade and went full power trip mode.
And politicians on both sides will keep getting away with this bullshit.
It's as if no one understands what the words "shall not be infringed" means
“I don’t need numbers.”
And that should tell you all about the logic they use in their decision making.
Yup, no logic whatsoever lol.
That’s from an unelected governor.
I bet if people stop paying their taxes she would care about the numbers
"This has nothing to do with lawful gun owners."
Considering that lawful owners are the only ones that would follow the rules so the anti-gun left can't have more ammunition (please pardon the pun) to restrict our rights; I would argue that yes...it fucking is.
Don't blame the left for this shit.
"Under no pretext must they give up their arms and equipment, and any attempt at disarmament must be forcibly resisted." - Karl Marx
Indeed. Lawful owners by definition are the only ones impacted by these laws at all. Murder, assault, theft, etc are already illegal. Period. Why can't we leave it at that? Why do we need 100 more laws, regulations and restrictions making all this stuff "more illegal"? Criminals don't notice any of this beaurcractic nonsense nor do they care. It has no effect on crime rates _(not that she needs to bother with data anyway of course.)_ It just creates hassle for normal folks ----- which is exactly the point. Maybe try enforcing the laws we have, and stop letting violent offenders off, and we might see some improvement ----- but it's not about improving safety either. See a pattern here?
Come NYS’s recently NEW BAIL Reform our legislators put in is really keeping us safe!!!! There is a crime wave that already hit NYS! How about looking at all the past violent offenders that you just let walk out of jail!!??
Hey Colion Noir and thank you for helping us law abiding tax paying citizens (victims) in NYS. Perhaps you can do another video about NY & Kathy Hochul who wants to “protect us citizens” and perhaps you can look into some other changes Kathy Hochul made along with the legislature in NYS which basically threw out BAIL in NYS, yes including for REPEAT OFFENDERS whom have long records of convictions on their personal arrest records! What this has done in NYS in the last year or two since they put this in action is open up all our jails and let out all kinds of people whom were awaiting trial…. problem is along with people whom might be under their initial offense and have never been convicted whom can’t afford bail, they are also just letting out hard core criminals whom have arrest and previous conviction records as long as my arm! How is this reasonable!!?? How is this making me and my family safe!!?? There have already been several news articles about since they let everyone out of jail because of the new laws in NYS that a past violent offender with previous convictions for criminal offenses was released according to new bail laws and then they went right back out and assaulted some innocent person when they should have been sitting in jail not being able to afford bail waiting for trial on their most recent offense! How the heck can Kathy Hochul say she “has to protect me and my family” when her other laws she and the NYS Legislature recently made is PROVEN to do the exact opposite, PUT MY LIFE IN DANGER!!??
Can you answer that? I sure as heck can’t figure the logic out in the above while also wanting to protect me by taking away my CCP!!!
Please help! Please do another video discussing all this in NYS on your large channel so I can post it on Kathy Hochul’s page!
ua-cam.com/users/clipUgkx0a6UzQbtG1hcnzZbNg1oN9Pcnf16pa5t
Bro I live in upstate New York and I HATE the bull crap the that comes out the politicians mouths. 🤮 Keep spreading the good word my brotha ✊🏽
That’s unconstitutional as HELL! 🤯
The SCOTUS specifically stated that New York can't make every place in the city a sensitive location, yet that's exactly what they've done.
(New York is a state)
@@WilliamWonka
I was referring to New York city, they're trying to make the entire city a no gun zone.
The NY AG is going to be the one in deep shit is my guess.
@Richard Busby are you stupid? The 2nd amendment is explicitly listed in the bill of rights. The whole point of the constitution is to guarantee that the government does not intervene in the exercise of these explicitly listed rights, of which abortion is not one
@Fait Accompli
This law isn't a city regulation. It is a state law.
Wow, citizens have to pass more "tests" and oversight than the police and the personal security
Let's just take about half of these new requirements, especially the hours of instruction and passing a test, and apply them to voting. See if the anti-gunners think that would pass constitutional muster.
Thank You! Thank You for being so clear, concise and honest! I love your videos!! You are a Great American!
Get her out of office now!!! She is the definition of feelings over facts.
Just watched the rest of the video. It is so blatantly obvious that she couldn't care less about facts, that CN said the same thing! What she is saying and doing is egregious and doesn't respect the people of our state at all. As an unelected governor, she deserves no power at all. No one voted for her, no one wanted her.
how did she get into office?
@@Sly9192 TPTB's manifesto & (end) purpose.
Vote her out. The democraps are not what they claim to be.
@@Sly9192 Cuomo got ousted for a bunch of sexual misconduct allegations. Now every red blooded New Yorker despised "Prince Andy", but I swear to god Hochul is worse. I've since left NYS and am BEGGING my parents to as well, before NYS bleeds them dry of their savings & rights in their old age.
@@Sly9192 She was appointed by Cuomo before he resigned.
"I don't need numbers."
If that's not "BECAUSE I SAY SO!" I don't know what is, and the people of New York let her get away with it.
Sounds like a certain Doctor saying "I AM THE SCIENCE" political speech for shut up. Because I said so
@@gjkorfinhays If I was running for her office, I'd totally use this in my campaign ads.
She wasn't elected
The singular characteristic of the Democrat Party is lawlessness. They demand everyone else follow all laws that they, the Democrats, don’t have to follow. They’re evil
Ahh yes, the equivalent of "What's your source? I made it up."
“WTF does that even mean” 🤣… I lost it
The governor and all who break the law of the land needs to be arrested, imprisoned and not allowed to run for any political office.
She has a responsibility for residents’ safety? Well, who is going to keep people safe from criminals unlawfully in possession of weapons?
They don't exist, now that the unicorn farts are raining down from the adminisphere.
And if you should ever fall victim to violent, armed criminals and live through it, she'll tell you your personal safety is not her responsibility.
That is why guns need to be available for law abiding folks,for protection from a government that goes power hungry,It is exactly the opposite of left leaning woke pious,inconsiderate folks who especially have protection from others who carry guns.thanks
The Second Amendment is for We the People to PROTECT OURSELVES and OTHERS as well as the State in Which we Reside, which in turn will PROTECT the United States Federal Government in a Time of WAR or OTHER Constitutionally Authorized EMERGENCY!!! One Decision that the USSC has RULED On Several Times is that LAW ENFORCEMENT(POLICE) HAVE NO DUTY to PROTECT YOU!!! USING COMMON SENSE THAT Decision MEANS that YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE for YOUR OWN SAFETY and LIFE!!! I and YOU and EVERY HUMAN on this EARTH HAS the RIGHT BY BIRTH to PROTECT THEMSELVES From HARM from a PERSON INTENT on DOING HARM and NO ONE has the RIGHT to SAY WITH WHAT WE Protect Ourselves!!!
"The right of a citizen to keep and bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the state government. It is one of the “High Powers” delegated directly to the citizen, and is excepted out of the general powers of government. A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it because it is above the law, and independent of lawmaking”
Cockrum v State, 24Tex394 (1859).
“The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials, and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.” - US Supreme Court, West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette
Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943)
"A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution."
In the words of Thomas Jefferson: "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
“A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law. The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individual’s rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.”
-Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
To Understand How the FF THOUGHT about the 2nd Amendment go to this Site: investortimes.com/freedomoutpost/americas-founders-actually-viewed-second-amendment/
CRIMINALS CARRY CONCEALED in PUBLIC all the TIME; nothing is EVER DONE about this and yet the PUBLIC SUPPOSEDLY WANTS the LAWFUL CITIZEN UNARMED!!!
Research and Read the Federalist and Antifederalist Papers
ANY Business that Forbids the CARRY of Firearms in THEIR Business is RESPONSIBLE/LIABLE for the Customers SAFETY and the SAME goes for GOVERNMENT Property or ANYWHERE the Gov RESTRICTS the CARRY of ARMS!!!.
@@bassblaster162 As the USSC has Stated MANY TIMES!!!! LEOs have NO DUTY to PROTECT you!!!
If this continues, SCOTUS *needs* to strike down permitting systems under Bruen.
Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943)
"A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution." Having to PAY for a PERMT would FALL under this Decision!!!
100% They gave the finger to SCOTUS.
@@Daddy5444 This is a new court... we can keep pushing.
I don't care about politicians protecting me, that responsibility is vested in me. I'll always carry, permit or no permit.
Can’t citizens arrest these people?
Criminals say: “I sure am glad we don’t have to go through those BS rules”
Saying “ I don’t need the numbers” is proof she is a dictator and not a representative of the people.
She does what she wants, and does not care what the people want.
Whenever an authority figure tells you “this is for your own good” be very very suspicious and say no!!!
I personally wish I could shake your hand and thank you for standing up for the 2A, and hitting back with the facts.
COLION -- In several years, I've never seen you THIS PISSED OFF. And brother, you're not alone. This has so much less to do w/ guns, & everything to do w/ control. Sickening. I miss my old country - I genuinely miss the United States.
Hochul being the grumpy tyrannical hag she is...
We were founded by Freemasons what did you expect?
Colion and Ted Nugent for President!😁
As I was watching this I said to myself he is definitely pissed the fuck off with New York and that bullshit
The US is still great, you just got a tyrannical administration running it to the ground. Red wave is coming, so hang tough
How are "common sense" gun laws going to come from people who have never handled or seen a firearm that wasn't on their personal bodyguards?
I wonder if these new laws apply to said body guards, im pretty sure I know the answer but I am curious how fast they would reconsider If their body guards had to go through the classes and recertification, or better yet if every gun the body guards used were registered to the employer therefore making the elite and the ones rich enough to have bodyguards responsible for the guns making them be the ones in those same classes and training and restricted to the same laws they are passing I wonder if something like that would make them change their tune?
And people who have NO common sense.
"When seconds count. The cops are only minutes away."
This is literally some of the unrealest reality ever🤯🤯🤯
There is nothing like the passion exuberated from a true patriot. Thank you Colion for expressing concern about the tyranny taking place in New York. May God help us.
You can tell that he's really angry about it, but he sure does hold back. I don't know how any of us can keep from going insane.
I am a retired LEO and this draconian gun law is absurd.
Right now in New York City it's 6 months to a year to get approved or denied for a firearm a handgun and they're saying you need training but you can't get the training until you have the firearm license not understanding how that works
Right on Brother! Keep on fighting for the truth!
I have to Leave New York 🤦🏾♂️. Please Vote this Lunatic out!!!! This is Getting Crazy.
I hate to say it but you are stuck with her. NY is now a communist state
Use your guns and take the bitch out
I guess we have to vote Zeldin
Yea this is why I'm proud to live in missouri. Constitutional carry and they signed a bill about not enforcing unconstitutional federal laws
And I had to leave California....and I am glad I did .those states are not America anymore....honestly I hope they leave the Union peacefully if possible
The governess is labeling it "sensible", when what she's really saying is totally nonsensical.
Authoritarianism. Disarm the population of peasants.
EVERYPLACE IN NYS IS A PRISON.
She see's herself as an empress, not a governess.
It makes sense to the insensate. That's a hard problem to solve.
How the hell is that lady still considered the governor of NY? She wasn't elected, the position was dropped in her lap when Cuomo left office
Colion's reaction here is exactly how I feel about this state
All that sounds like a "Privilege" not a "Right"!!!
Defending ur life is a privilege?
@@5N3K93 according to NY laws, yea it sounds like it...
This is dramatically more complicated than my security clearance investigations.
Also the unbelievable audacity of her saying she's protecting our rights.
TS/SCI doesn't have shit on NY gun laws. Well said.
Tell us about the rights of the young woman murdered by gun at point black range. Did she have, beyond right to life, ALSO have a right NOT to be a gun--nut?
@@jnagarya519 what about the woman murdered by knife at the hands of her abusive ex while waiting on a permit to OWN a pistol? what about her right to life AND her right to defend herself with a goddamned gun, a gun that would have given her far better chances against her attacker.
A criminal using a gun illegally should have no bearing on my ability to own and use mine legally. The additions of these hurdles to make it more difficult and more expensive, arbitrarily i might add, is nothing more than collective punishment. And last i checked, collective punishment is a war crime under the geneva convention.
And given that these hurdles impede the basic human right to self defense, add human rights violations on top.
@@killer13324 Yes, we can be certain she wouldn't have hesitated, and the gun taken from her and used against her.
"WHATABOUT! WHATABOUT! WHATABOUT!
Are you capable of REASON? Here's a clue for you law-illiterate hysterical hotheaded gun-nuts:
Every right is inextricably entwined with RESPONSIBILITY. WHEN do you EVER use that dirty word?
Just more of the gaslighting polititians have been foisting on the population for years! Wake up America!
Hochul spits in our face and tells us it’s for our own good Time to get out of NY and let the wolves feast on the sheep
This is somehow even more damning than Alito and the SCOTUS saying you have no right to privacy. Good God you don't have a 'right' to anything anymore.
Get whatever you can while you can. And be smart about it.
So what’s the plan to appeal this law? Clearly all the layers are a deterrent to renew / and apply.
She is NOT protecting anyone in "her" state. Apparently the VERY HIGH crime rates are some of the numbers she doesn't need. Then again the mayor was shocked when he found out how bad crime in NY, you know the city he is the mayor of is. I'm confused, I thought he had been a cop there and lived there. I'm stunned he was shocked...
No, he isn't a cop and hadn't been one for years. He was a politico-cop...a cop whose mission is his career, not a real public servant whose career is birthed by his mission.
Most big city and many medium sized city police chiefs are politico-cops, they look good on paper (correct schools, high-profile assignments, and rapid promotions) but ask yourself when did he have any time to do real police work, and then ask him(or her) about the last arrest they made...
@@JD-tn5lz . We called them “climbers” because they have about 6 months in the field then they start being groomed for promotion. They look good and smell good but usually have no street sense, and aren’t respected by their peers. They look better and better through a multi year career because they aren’t in the street (or road) paying their dues with their physical and mental health and wellness.
The law abiding liberty loving American doesn't want this weak pathetic authoritarian to protect us and our loved ones. That's my duty to protect my family, not some sworn public servant that has no idea what America means, no idea what public service means, and doesn't even like why we're Americans. I don't need or want her permission to behave like an American. If she doesn't like why we're America, she can go pound sand, kick rocks, GTFO.
Yes, he was a cop, and yes he was shocked by how much crime was going on that he wasn’t getting a part of the action on, while he was a cop. Although, now that he’s mayor, I’m sure he’s getting every penny of action on all of it.
Thts not true the criminals will be safer to criminal with less resistance to worry about
"I have a responsibility to protect the people of this state." By making it virtually impossible for the people of the state to legally be able to protect themselves. 🤔
I recently took my pistol permit class in CT and I must say that it feels like my rights are already infringed before I’ve even applied for my temporary permit. 8-12 week wait for the temp permit!
I live in nyc right now and it feels weird. I find it really weird that the city can pick and choose witch constitutional amendments apply to us and witch dont. Feels really uneasy