New Study Shows Violent Crime Down After Passing Constitutional Carry
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 січ 2024
- 📲 Subscribe to @ColionNoir Here: bit.ly/3OTkrgB
In the wake of Ohio's adoption of the "constitutional carry" law on June 13, 2022, a recent study by the Center for Justice Research, in collaboration with the office of Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost and Bowling Green State University, sheds light on the positive impact it had on gun crime in the state.
This significant legislative change marked Ohio as the 23rd state to permit citizens to carry concealed weapons without a permit.
The study, conducted over the span of two years from June 2021 to June 2023, focused on the relationship between permitless carry and firearm-related crimes in Ohio's eight most populous cities.
The findings revealed a noteworthy decrease in gun-related crimes in six out of the eight cities, providing valuable insights into the efficacy of the constitutional carry law.
Director of the Center for Justice Research, Melissa Burek, Ph.D. in criminal justice, spearheaded the research efforts.
Contrary to concerns raised by mayors of large cities attributing increased crime to the change in state law, the study emphasizes that the constitutional carry law is not the root cause of the issue.
Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost underscored the importance of focusing efforts on addressing criminals responsible for gun violence rather than penalizing responsible Ohioans exercising their Second Amendment rights.
Specifically, the study highlighted significant decreases in firearm-related crimes in cities such as Akron, Columbus, and Toledo, as well as an overall reduction across all eight cities combined.
Parma experienced the most substantial decline, with a 22% decrease in gun crime, followed by Akron and Toledo, each witnessing an 18% drop.
While Dayton and Cincinnati saw modest increases of 6% and 5%, respectively, the overall trend showcased a positive impact of the constitutional carry law in reducing gun-related incidents in Ohio.
Keep America Tactical Merchandise (EVERY STATE)
➡️ bit.ly/3TGdeAH
➡️ 2nd Amendment Embroidered Premium Hoodies
shop.mrcolionnoir.com/collect...
➡️ Join Our 2A Membership Club here on UA-cam and get these perks:
www.youtube.com/@colionnoir/join
➡️ Join MY Exclusive 2A Advocacy Text List while AUTOMATICALLY being entered in our monthly 2A Giveaways
bit.ly/3FFLHJi
➡️ Get UnApologetically 2A Content In Short-Form On UA-cam & Help Protect The Second Amendment
ua-cam.com/users/colionnoirsho...
➡️ FREE BOOK - If I Only Had One Concealed Carry
www.mrcolionnoir.com/start-here/
Looking to help further our Pro Constitution, Pro 2A message, donate below:
www.MrColionNoir.com/donate/
UnApologetically 2A Content Content On Other Platforms:
Twitter - / mrcolionnoir
Instagram - / colionnoir
Facebook - / colionnoir
Gab - gab.com/ColionNoir
Truth Social- truthsocial.com/@ColionNoir
UA-cam Shorts - ua-cam.com/users/colionnoirshorts?...
#2ANews #ColionNoir #ThePewPewLife #PewPewLife #SecondAmendment - Розваги
We need to make constitutional carry national.
Supreme Court basically has. Unfortunately democrats don't abide by the constitution or Supreme Court
For the first about 150 years of our country's existence, it was perfectly fine and normal.
Shall Not Be Infringed.
I would even extend that to students above a certain age having the right to prove they can be trusted to earn a School Carry Permit.
technically it already is.
@@clintmiller3654exactly what I was going to say
Of course anti gunners don't care that criminals carry guns everyday, regardless of any law, permit, or training requirements. Laws don't control criminals. Laws control the law abiding.
Criminals have guns because they are so easy to get here in the States. Why don't pro gun people understand that?
Loose gun laws make it easier for criminals to get guns. Loose gun laws also make it easier for people to commit massacres. It’s not rocket science.
FACTS...
@@billyray332 Exactly, there are dangerous people out there.
We should continue to sell millions of guns without regulation and hope they don’t fall into the wrong hands.
@@anonymous.anonymity. already in the wrong Hands 👐 & growing.
1991: 200 million guns, 24,700 homicides.
2020: 400 million guns, 21,570 homicides.
MORE guns means LESS homicides
Don't forget more people. That makes the 2020 number technically even lower. Violent crime peaked worldwide in 1997. Violent crime now worldwide is HALF what it was in 1997. If you account for the fact that we have nearly twice as many people in the world now, that makes the difference of half, exponential. We are having half the violence while having twice the people. That sounds like a HUGE win to me!
The 80/90s gun crime was driven by the crack epidemic. Much like the majority of gun crime now, gang and drug related. It's not so much how many guns there are just how active criminals are
In fairness, people weren't going outside as much in 2020.
@@cathlive267 FACT!
Yes, but crime also spiked during the aftermath of covid due to the lockdowns, as well as, the political turmoil and its still lower despite the fact that we have more guns and more states than ever that are constitutional carry. This only further proves that the gun control agenda is only about control and its always been about control.
Want citizens trained in gun safety? Do it in public school. Why not? Next!
There was a time when some schools had shooting ranges. The Boy Scouts had boys shooting.
That used to happen I think in the '50's.
If they want to be safe to prevent accidents, they could easily use BB gun replicas for teaching with all the same weight and functionality of a real gun but next to no potential for fatality. I remember in middle school only 8 or 9 years ago having a few days in PE where we shot bows at targets, of course with lighter draw weight and blunter tips than real arrows, and nobody got hurt at any point because the teachers made sure we knew what we were doing and to not do unsafe things.
Never heard this idea before, but I really like it. We could even make it an elective or make it to where you have to be (for example) a junior in high school to take the class if some of the kids are uncomfortable handling a weapon.
@@user-fe5ns7ts6v It wasn't uncommon up to the late 60's in some areas, mostly the rural schools though where hunting was more common. I had the NRA Hunter Safety course at Summer Camp in 1967 at the age of 11.
As an Ohioan, I'm proud of my state for biting the bad PR bullet at going constitutional. I'm especially happy that plenty of institutions (including my somewhat liberal college) are talking about the change positively and not denying the facts.
I carried in Ohio without a Permit before CC even passed, lolol.
But i’m so glad they passed it so i’m not criminalized for using my Second Amendment right daily.
In CALIFORNIA Modesto county in the past 15 years there were 2, thats TWO SHOOTINGS by CCW carriers. YEA, WE are the problem. And there were 22,453 shootings by NON CCW carriers, otherwise known as CRIMINALS, which the government thinks THATS OK. ITs those TWO CCW SHOOTINGS that are the real problem
@sureshotmidget14 without condemning or condoning, I understand.
As a Californian, I'm proud of my state's strict gun laws. They were enacted by famous Republican Ronald Reagan to disarm the Black Panthers. Now we need to disarm the MAGAs.
Just like Nan the Whale campaigned on though in 2022, as soon as they wrestle power back, they've already promises CC will be repealed, whether it works or not. They simply don't care, it's ultimately about leaving you defenseless against THEM.
Why haven’t you testified before Congress? Brandon Harerra did. You’re an expert and a lawyer. Your voice should be heard in Congress about mag bans, AR 15s, ccw etc!
It probably wouldn't matter. The politicians who promote gun control policies can't be swayed. What does work is getting people informed, and having them vote out politicians that promote gun control.
@@logmover123 Exactly, because gun control is a precursor for something else.
I’m pretty sure he has
It's because he is with USCCA. He does not want his partners to drop him. If he says the wrong things it can affect him and his partnership with USCCA.
Perhaps the supreme court makes some kind of blanket ruling regarding firearms, ammunitiin, and accessories. One can only dream @@logmover123
The problem is not guns, it's our legal system letting repeat offenders out of jail over and over again, also the cause of most gun crime is drug related, if we kept drug dealers in jail or had capital punishment for them, gun crime would go way down.
Funnily enough, I haven't heard of beer or whiskey dealers committing gun crimes, at least not since alcohol was illegal 🤔
Democrat policies hard at work keeping criminals on the streets and out of jail.
@@asahearts1 If you're arguing for drugs to be legal, I think it's personally a bad idea, that's basically what Democrat cities like San Francisco have done and there are drug addicts in the streets living in their own feces.
@@asahearts1 If you're arguing for drugs to be legalized, I personally think it's a bad idea, because that's basically what Democrat cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles have done and now drug addicts are on the streets in big tents.
@@adamcuneo7189 The way they've handled the drug issue isn't the sole reason they've turned out that way, but yeah, they've done a terrible job of it. If alcohol legalization had been handled the same way it would have ended as poorly. I don't recall the government giving out free Everclear or setting up bars when prohibition ended.
Gee… who would’ve thought that when ANYONE can carry a gun, people who carry ILLEGALLY wonder if the person they mess with has the SAME thing THEY do… I can’t figure this out…
It make head sponge hurt
People who support constitutional carry think everyone is the same as they are: reasonable people who mostly just want to be left alone, but also want a plan B that doesn't involve the words "run, hide, die."
People who oppose firearm ownership think everyone is the same as they are: unreasonable, emotional, violent psychopaths prone to violent outbursts with no ability to control themselves when things aren't going perfectly well for them, and the fact they think they're going to get shot by a law-abiding civilian is actually a bit of a self-report.
The really funny part is, if you *allow* anyone to carry a weapon, both of these groups tend to self-police. The reasonable people will be armed, because they want to be able to protect themselves and others. The unreasonable people won't carry a weapon, because they're actually cripplingly terrified they'll use it on themselves first.
In the US, 12.5% of home invasions happen when someone is home. Of those, the victim is injured 26% of the time.
In the UK, over 50% of home invasions happen when someone is home.
Find out how many home invasions there are in the US each year and you di the math how much guns are used in defence MINIMUM.
@@Stuff857 Defence inside the home maybe; that doesn't include outside the home.
You are not an outstanding writer.
Saying that it's "nonsensical" to carry a firearm for protection is like saying that having a fire extinguisher in the kitchen is not going to save your house from burning down if a fire breaks out !??
If the fire starts on the outside, a fire extinguisher in the kitchen probably won’t stop a house from burning down.
@@anonymous.anonymity. it 100% will if you react quickly enough.
Same idea with guns. Lives are saved if reaction time is instant..aka citizens carrying responding in seconds. Not the police who are minutes away at best.
@@anonymous.anonymity.shut up
You've hit the logic nail right on the head, my friend.
@@nickyj3571 free speech is a first amendment right.
I thought you lot cared about rights?
It's almost like the criminals were carrying whether they were legally allowed to or not.
A permit to carry is against the constitution
😱 O M G. Go figure!
@@Lightning613only in America, thanks to the second amendment.
Well done
What an.......'interesting' observation. I'm going to assume you made that statement....ironically.
@@martindeano4634’edited’ 😂
You donut
Constitutional carry is a right (you are absolutely correct). Gun free zones don’t prevent violence. Teachers should be allowed to carry for protection if they choose.
Again, given the right to keep and bear arms, which "shall not be infringed", why would the question ever even have to be brought up as to whether or not teachers, or any American citizen in any form of employment, should be 'allowed' or 'not allowed' to carry? It's a nonsense question. In my view, the one and only answer ever required to the bewildering question as to whether or not a given person should be 'allowed' to carry is 'The second amendment' - period.
Honestly, I eternally fail to see what is the basis for the endless disagreement between the pro-second amendment people and the 'anti-gunners'. The second amendment was installed in the bill of rights for reasons which were valid at their inception and are equally valid today. Is there an issue with violence, and gun-violence in the country? The answer is, and shall forever be, "yes". There will always be humans among the population who are of a criminal nature and who will do criminal, even violent/murderous things. This is but one of the reasons for the existence of this amendment - so that right thinking, law-abiding citizens, in good standing, may adequately defend themselves from not only those criminals who would seek to rob, harm, or murder them, but also so that 'the people' may adequately (and preferably with great dominance) defeat a tyrannical governemnt should one arise. I hold these truths to be self evident, as I would expect any right thinking person to do. Good luck, America.
@@seanjohnson386 ‘right thinking, law abiding, in good standing’ ????
Constitution says nothing about right thinking or good standing.
Shall not infringe!
Criminals fearing repercussions of their actions.
Seems to me that constitutional carry is a 2nd amendment right and should be a federal law passed by congress.
it has been always !
Don’t need a law. Just need the Judicial Branch to uphold the Constitution.
Cities have passed laws that you couldn't open carry way before Constitutional carry was approved!. And the Constitution is law so by rights if you openly carried years ago you were legal and still are allowed we really didn't need Constitutional carry we already had it. But by doing this it shuts down the corrupt woke city leaders from going against our Constitutional rights!.
The second amendment to the US constitution is written rather clearly and concisely, in my opinion. As such, it is my interpretation that this right spells out in crystal clear language that American citizens have the right to "keep and bear arms".....and that that right "shall not be infringed". That being said, how is it that some states, or any states in the union, imagine that they have the authority to limit, control, or restrict gun ownership in any way, shape, or form? Honestly. Anyone?? Anyone??
@@seanjohnson386 Yes. It is written quite clearly. However, those who choose to go all-in on Marxist doctrines seek ways to undermine laws and twist language to suite their preferred outcomes.
The DEMs adhere to the basic Marxist twist on law: “Apply the law to one’s enemies and interpret the law for one’s friends.” (Paraphrased)
That is why the DEMs have always fought to keep Constitutionalist judges out of the judiciary. That way by having someone willing to re-interpret the law based on political whims, they can keep changing the application and outcome of any law based on their current wishes. Kinda like playing poker where the dealer changes the rules based on each card dealt.
One of my favorite quotes from an author: “Well, in the first place an armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life." - Robert A. Heinlein
The US is the most armed society in the world, why isn’t it the most polite?
@anonymous.anonymity. I can tell you in places where there is the chance of encountering a firearms owner, aggression and rudeness are low. Furthermore most firearm owners are level headed and even tempered
@@Driftxcess1places like Chicago?
@@anonymous.anonymity. Chicago is in one of the 10 most heavily regulated states in the country. You're making our point for us by bringing it up in regards to high gun violence
@anonymous.anonymity. I live in a town in Florida where at least 70 percent of the adult population is armed. It is a small town but still for its size the population is pretty considerable. The crime rate...is almost nil. Worst thing to happen there in the two years I lived there is I heard someone got gas stolen out their car. Also, unlike these people, criminals are not legal gun owners. They fear no one and no repercussions except maybe losing their life. You cannot lump them in with legal firearm holders who would rather have peace and go about their way rather than possibly end up in a court case for over a year because they had to pull (not even fire) their gun.
"It is nonsensical to let someone carry a deadly weapon if they've not had to prove themselves...." prove themselves of what? Being toothless towards you? If I walk outside with a hammer, that's a "deadly weapon." You don't get to tell us what we can defend ourselves with.
They actually tell you that you can't carry a hammer to defend yourself either.
If you have it for other reasons you won't be convicted for using it, but they will literally use a melee self defense weapon against you in court if you had it for that reason.
@priestesslucy3299 really?! How long before they start charging you for using your hands in self-defense.
@@9usuck0
Oh wait, they sometimes do. I’m with you, whether or not they want to be able to carry a gun bears zero relevance as to whether or not we (or the bad guys) will carry a gun.
You see this argument come up in the UK all the time when you bring up the topic of making conceal carry legal, and it's always the same people who cry about defunding the police that are the same people who say we should ban all knives/weapons etc. If you're not gonna fund the people who's job it is to defend law abiding citizens then let those citizens defend themselves
@@Lo-tf6qt I think both. Fund the people who defend our rights, but arm yourself, because they can't be everywhere and getting justice doesn't mean much after you are graped or no longer with us.
The problem is voter's keep electing politician's that do not uphold the Constitution of the U.S.A. Especially The Second Amendment !!
What no one compares when they talk about "gun violence" is how the US compares to other countries when it comes to "overall violence". I think they'll find that we have a "violence" problem, not a "gun violence" problem.
But they only care about the guns because we can protect ourselves adequately from them (the tyrants)
As King Blackface has restricted more and more guns, more and more gun violence happens. But they’re fudging the numbers now.
Please stop using the term "Gun violence" as 1) there is no such thing given 'people' commit crime/violence, and 2) using the term normalizes it and promotes the Left's anti-2A agenda.
Spot on. Look at England, they are now talking about regulating or banning large knives because of the violence.
I genuinely dont think we have a violence issue.
I think we have a lack of respect issue. Too many people walking around without realizing the basis of respect is the fear of retribution from the other person (whether that be social or physical violence (social violence would be akin to trash talk)).
You need to run for office we would support you fully.
Stop simping
Go pay some taxes and keep your head down.
if they're so worried about people getting guns without proper training, why not put the gun training into the public school system? we should view "not knowing how to use a gun" the same way we view "not knowing how to read".
People who do not want an armed society sure as hell do not want an armed society that is not only safely handling, but proficient in the use of weapons. They need people, especially children, to have accidents. They need people to fail at effectively stopping crime due to poor training. They need the government to not only have an advantage in weaponry, but training as well. They need all of this to justify continued restrictions on weapons.
If firearm safety was put into schools and accidents went down because people know how to safely handle weapons, it hurts the anti-gun agenda.
If people had enough training to effectively thwart crime with their personal weapons, it hurts the anti-gun agenda.
If people start taking their safety seriously into their own hands and become successful, it hurts the anti-gun agenda.
That is why they are against policies that encourage safety and deter crime. Because should pro-gun policies succeed at lowing accidents and deterring crime, anti-gun agendas would inevitably fail.
That is why they do things that hinder the average person from being not only safe, but proficient with their weapons. They don't want gun owners to be safe and successful because it destroys the anti-gun agenda.
It's sad that some would put an unconstitutional agenda over safety and effective solutions, but that is the reality of anti-gun politics.
They say that people should get training, but then make getting training as hard and expensive as possible. They say they only want to ban, "assault weapons," but I guarantee that they won't stop until you're being raided by the ATF over an unregistered muzzleloader that your neighbor snitched on you for.
They want a disarmed society, and they start with the lowest hanging fruit, piece by piece and inch by inch.
While I am not familiar with the time, I would not be surprised if when automatic weapons became more and more heavily regulated to the effect of a ban for the average citizen that some may have been like, "What if they don't stop at just automatics/machine guns?" Then the anti-gun side was like, "Oh, you're just making a slippery slope argument. We're only going after automatics/machine guns." Now here we are, arguing over whether or not we can even have semi-automatics and concealed carry even with permits.
History shows that gun control, if given an inch, will attempt to go the mile and then some. It's not a slippery slope. A sizable number of people actually do want total disarmament. Given that fact, there is no reason to expect that those same people will stop with just "assault weapons" or "common sense gun reform." That's just the cake they use to try to get rino fudds and those in the middle on the fence to swallow the blue pill known as gun control.
@@squeakydolphin9615 wow all that should also go for driving
@@edwardjeremias4087 Do you mean as in, "Drivers education should be part of standardized education?" It would have been nice if my driver's education was free from a public school. I had to pay over 300 dollars to take a driver's education course.
I was in one of the last, likely more "watered down" gun safety courses, when a child in elementary school, in the '70s. All firearm safety courses, in my area (allowed to be taught by LEOs), were gone by '80 and any that were left? were likely in more Rural districts and gone by '85-'86, if that... We, also, had Police in our schools, till Biden came along, but that was after my time, as I was in College or entering the workforce. It would be great to see Real Firearms Safety training in schools! We only had fire drills, back then...
I agree 1,000,000 percent.
It's amazing the governor of Ohio passed constitutional carry, but vetoed a bill that banned men in women's bathrooms...
Legislature pushed it through
The disturbing history of gun control should speak for itself especially to anyone who really spends time figuring out the different factors leading to issues.
Even if they didn't words have definitions for a reason.
Gun control always leads to atrocities carried out by governments. Ask the Jews in 1940s Germany how safe they felt after the Nazi's took their guns.
Gun laws are about genocide and democide. History proves it. FDR, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini proved it. FDR had the blood of many tens of thousands of Jews on his hands.
There are over 20 nations that outrank the US in human development. They all have gun control.
It’s not rocket science
Can't tell you how many times I've seen videos of home and business owners drawing a firearm, and the criminals fleeing immediately like cowards. Once they realize the people they're trying to wrong can fight back, they flee.
💯 correct. The same thing happened in Kennesaw Ga. When the city made it manditory for its citizens to carry arms ,criminals stopped being stupid.
Own, not carry
Maybe an armed society really is more polite.
I that were true, the US would be the most polite nation in the world.
Unfortunately that is not the case.
@@anonymous.anonymity. 2a supporters are far more polite than liberals
@@anonymous.anonymity.you cannot classify the entire United States in that statement and think that you are correct you have to look at the large inner cities that have the most gun violence places like I live in in rural areas and states that are mostly red have a lot less violent crimes with firearms and if you were really concerned about deaths then you would be on Paige's talking about drunk drivers and cars that do over 100 miles an hour and you be talking about everyday things that people die from and trying to find a solution for it but no it's only firearms and that's the only thing some of you liberals see
@@anonymous.anonymity.we are a polite nation. Gun owners overall are some of the most polite people on earth. I was around 3 people yesterday while eating lunch that had guns. He and his family along with me and my woman were the absolute politest people in the entire restaurant and you can take that to the bank because an armed society and people not knowing who's carrying guns anywhere in areas where crime is very low is truly a polite society. The CDC released their findings recently and said that gun crimes are actually not as bad overall as people think because guns saved more than a half of a million to over 3 million lives in one year. Unfortunately whatever planet or country you live in must be very violent
Well, 'DUH ! !"
I'm just surprised Ohio allowed the facts to come out instead of asking the CDC to do their dirty work.
what has C D C got to do with anything ?
@@EDD519 democrats, last year, went to the CDC, who had first posted statistics on their site that good guys with guns actually do stop a lot of bad guys, and asked the CDC to remove that stat because it doesn't help their narrative about more gun control
My comment was deleted??
Hopefully Pennsylvania will get on board too.
The democrat house just tried with a bunch of bans. PA doesn't have much time left unless elections become fair again.
As a ohioan I'm so glad you did a video on this show them we need our gun rights not taken away
in England they got rid of guns now they are getting rid of knives. and they have more CCTV cameras per square mile and it still does not help at all
Well they gave lower rates of gang violence, gun violence, mass shootings and school shootings.
So it would say it’s worked pretty well
@anonymous.anonymity. While we're at it, North Korea has banned everything and has crazy surveillance, too. Works well, doesn't it?
@@anonymous.anonymity. Everything you've said has already been explained and/or debunked even on this channel.
So congrats on not being trusted with a butter knife while living in 1984 under ignorance.
And criminals still have guns in england
CRIMINALS DO NOT BUY INSURANCE TO CARRY FIREARMS ; BUT THE LEGAL CITIZENS TOLD THEY NEED INSURANCE TO CARRY WHY ?...
Arizona in the house, we are on the verge of losing our gun rights here, all it takes is one election, and one generation not taught the importance of self defense.
Fear is a great tactic to control the masses...
Who knew criminals would avoid someone if they thought they would fire back
You are absolutely right that the bureaucrats and anti gun will make the training as hard to achieve to carry a gun.
New Jersey legislators had in place the same qualification as a state trooper for CCH permit. Not everyone is going to be as fit and or as good a shot as a trooper to pass the CCH permit test. They will do ANYTHING to bar people from carrying a gun.
Isn’t that what they did in CA? Ban 90% of the instructors?
And after watching the donut brigade shoot, a blind man can outshoot most. Fitness? Crippled people deserve to defend themselves.
Most people I know that carry are better shots than the police are these days.
Good ole New Jersey always infringing on 2A rights 😮. Very not surprised.
Exactly. Criminals don’t care about laws.
Living in Ohio, EVERYONE is carrying now. I would bet we have more guns being CC"d now than even TX. We have had Open Carry forever prior to our State becoming permitless carry.
I carried in Ohio without a Permit before CC even passed, lolol.
But i’m so glad they passed it so i’m not criminalized for using my Second Amendment right daily.
Been carrying all my Life without a permit since Teenage Yrs, Saved me & my Loved one's Lives...
Outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.
And if they don't get a gun, they'll use something else like a car, a knife, or explosives.
Then all good people become VICTIMS.
@adamcuneo7189 You never hear about knife control, hammer control, or car control. ONLY gun control. Makes perfect, logical sense, right?
@@bryantfletcher3613you do hear about Knife Control in the UK, where firearms are hard to come by
@@bryantfletcher3613 No, we hear about knife control in europe. FYI criminals have full auto AKs, some with 100 round drums.
Where do most muggings occur? New York. I don't remember hearing about many in Texas.
The twenty cities with the highest violent crime rates (number of incidents per 100,000 people) are:
St. Louis, MO (2,082)
Detroit, MI (2,057)
Baltimore, MD (2,027)
Memphis, TN (2,003)
Little Rock, AR (1,634)
Milwaukee, WI (1,597)
Rockford, IL (1,588)
Cleveland, OH (1,557)
Stockton, CA (1,415)
Albuquerque, NM (1,369)
Springfield, MO (1,339)
Indianapolis, IN (1,334)
Oakland, CA (1,299)
San Bernardino, CA (1,291)
Anchorage, AK (1,203)
Nashville, TN (1,138)
Lansing, MI (1,136)
New Orleans, LA (1,121)
Minneapolis, MN (1,101)
Chicago, IL (1,099)
December 15, 1791 is when the 2nd amendment was ratified. When did it state that we needed a license or training or permission in regards to anything to do with the 2nd amendment? It was written to protect us from government. So how did we get to the point that we allow the government to make rules on the 2nd amendment? Makes no sense.
Name a rule on religion or speech that's constitutional.
Current times are making so many factual sayings like "an armed society is a polite society" so worn.
I was born and raised in a constitutional carry state and when I was living there the crime was almost none.
We got constitutional carry here in Oklahoma in 2019 and I'd be interested to see if it's had any effect on crime. There were a lot of people getting all bent out of shape claiming it would make gun crimes skyrocket but it has done literally nothing of the sort. When criminals know there are way more people out there carrying guns for self defense I assure you it gives them trepidation.
The twenty cities with the highest violent crime rates (number of incidents per 100,000 people) are:
St. Louis, MO (2,082)
Detroit, MI (2,057)
Baltimore, MD (2,027)
Memphis, TN (2,003)
Little Rock, AR (1,634)
Milwaukee, WI (1,597)
Rockford, IL (1,588)
Cleveland, OH (1,557)
Stockton, CA (1,415)
Albuquerque, NM (1,369)
Springfield, MO (1,339)
Indianapolis, IN (1,334)
Oakland, CA (1,299)
San Bernardino, CA (1,291)
Anchorage, AK (1,203)
Nashville, TN (1,138)
Lansing, MI (1,136)
New Orleans, LA (1,121)
Minneapolis, MN (1,101)
Chicago, IL (1,099)
One year after getting constitutional carry in Oklahoma, the violent crime rate increased by 5.1%
OHIO BABY!! As a Youngstown resident, I constitutional carry everywhere I go and wear my Ohio Tactical hat 5 days a week at work and my "I am the Militia" hat on weekends
Amen to that! This law saved me some money and time. I live in Columbus and work full time with a wife and son on the way and I simply just don't have the money to go and get my CCW which I plan to get eventually just in case I travel to other states that require it but Im in no rush. Im glad we passed constitutional carry! Now if only they would pass it nationally!
I went to high school in the 80s. It was a rural area, but many people would drive to Columbus for work, our town is only about 45 minutes from Columbus. The highschool I went to was full of cars and trucks with gun racks. We all had shotguns and rifles, loaded with extra ammo in the glovebox, in the parking lots at the school. No violence ever occurred because of guns because we knew how to responsibly use them. We were taught how to use one, how to clean and take care of them IN SCHOOL. The problem is education....
Moved from Idaho to Seattle late ‘22. Massive mistake. Taking a new job in Arkansas and not looking back. King County Washington averages over a murder a day and rest assured not everything is being accurately reported
Imagine how amazing and safe America would be if everyone had a gun, had the backing of the law to use lethal force for their self-defense, the police had better funding and training and if DA's and judges weren't so fucking soft on criminals?
It would also be more safe if they stopped letting repeat offenders out of jail over and over and over again.
Not everyone deserves to own a gun.
@@DocMitchell69 If they're not safe enough to own a gun, then they shouldn't be safe enough to be out of prison.
@@adamcuneo7189 But why make it easier for them to buy a gun legally?
@@DocMitchell69 My point is if you're so concerned about them getting their hands on a gun, why release them from prison at all?
Hey Noir, you got any data on Georgia since they passed their open carry law?
Ohio native here, born and raised! When this bill was being passed, so many of my lefty peers were convinced it would be a catastrophe, and I was arguing that "mark my words, crime will go down and you'll eat crow". Some of them considered it, some of them screeched and squealed.
1.5 years later, look at what happened. Not only has crime gone down, but their other concern, that "unqualified" people would be carrying and be dangerous without training, didn't pan out. What happened is that more people, now feeling a connection to their right and thus taking it seriously, instead of feeling it was a command from on-high, started getting more training than they would otherwise have gotten. So it actually has caused _more_ training than people would have gotten had they been forced to.
This is one of the best things that could have happened for gun rights, as it has opened up so many undeniable statistics to discussion.
May God bless Colin and his family! Truly a patriot, and great citizen! Don't like his sponsorship, but like his points!
Great video as always Mr Noir!!!
None of the anti-gunners want to acknowledge the fact that despite record sales of guns since 2020 the homicide rate (excluding self deletion and officer involved shootings) has steadily declined during the same period (to a rate similar to the later 1960’s).
Why would you exclude suicides?
Baltimore's murder rate in 2023 fell below 300 for the first time since the riots.
0:33 I heard a coworker spew this nonsense after CC started in TX. I wanted to call her out so bad 😂
I'm so very impressed with listening to this informative brother right here. I have learned so much from your sharing of this valuable knowledge and I thank you for your service and sharing of your knowledge 🙏🏿
Columbus Ohio represent 🤘🤘
Wow! It's almost like a society that can defend themselves is a safe society. Who would've thought...
John R. Lott Jr. wrote a book in 1998 titled, "More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws." Thanks Colion for another great episode.
Keep telling the truth Sir, God Bless You for your hard work!!
7:07 'if I'm a criminal and that is my career path, I don't want my job to be harder'
*_This_* is the reason politicians are coming after firearms. They don't want to make their criminal careers more difficult.
The second amendment makes it easier for criminals to access weapons.
It’s not rocket science
@@anonymous.anonymity. honey, you can't close Pandora's Box.
The U.S. has already become flooded with firearms and there's nothing the government can do to change that.
The best way to reduce gun victims is by arming and training as many good people as you can.
Take a look at the crime statistics for Constitutional Carry states compared to before they implemented it.
@@anonymous.anonymity. look up the stats on how many criminal uses of firearms were legally purchased by the criminal.
Pandora's box is already open in this country and it's never going away. Even if you stripped the 2nd amendment and the firearms of every law abiding citizen, the criminals won't give up their guns, and other criminals will import guns for crime and profit.
@@priestesslucy3299 you don’t have to purchase guns illegally when private sales without background checks or registration are legal.
@@priestesslucy3299 if you really think criminals are importing guns into a nation that is the largest producer and exporter of firearms, you are delusional.
I have never held or shot a handgun in my life thanks to New York making it really long and difficult to even to get just a pistol permit, let alone a concealed carry license. So I just stick with long guns.
Mr. Noir please help us here in Minnesota, I am a law abiding citizen who has a concealed carry permit, my wife and son also have their permits, it is alarming that not only is The Mall Of America a gun free zone but what’s worse is they now have firearm and ammunition detection K9’s there, this is absolutely an infringement good sir and I am outraged
And the gun grabbers are having a $#!+ fit over the outcome. 😂😂😂
I support Colion Nior for President of the NRA. Intelligent, well spoken and knows what he's talking about.
They'll spin it until they get the falsehood they want.
@@hendo338 indeed!!
Yeah, but then they'll be like, "B b b but, muh Australia, muh UK, muh Japan...it worked for them." Blah blah blah.
@toxicdragon323 and that's when I say that we've got more freedom and liberty than those countries and if they want to move there, Noone I'd stopping them. Always rely on our US Constitution and Bill of Rights.
A armed society is a polite society.
No it’s not.
@romansilentempire8309 How is this not true?
As long as there are politicians they will always go after guns. Politicians have been going after guns since the 1930s and won’t stop
I live in Ohio and I’m proud of our constitutional carry law. I carry everywhere I go
Makes perfect sense.
Criminals already carry without permits 😂😂😂
Throughly enjoyed the delivery of the facts. Love the content. Thank you.
70's Miami police strikes mayor tells public to open carry , crimes dropped 30%. GO figure !
The government should not be trying to turn rights into privileges. What’s next? Required training before being allowed to speak in public?
That's the plan
Proud to be born and raised in Ohio, I am now a Texas resident though.
Ohio Gun Laws have rapidly improved sense 2016, Re-pealed “Duty to Retreat” , Reduced the training required for Teachers to Carry in schools and passed Constitutional Carry.
I'm proud of ohio for the most part except issue 1 passing.
Follow the science😁
Thank you for what you do for all of us!!!
CLE here... It's crazy how it almost IMMEDIATELY started changing.
👍
My buddy lives in Dayton and I am not surprised that crime INCREASED there for any reason it is a sh*t hole
For the past few months I've been wondering why I never get any of your new videos in/on my feed, now I know why, they unsubscribed me... unbelievable, well I'm back. Thank you Colion for continuing to educate, communicate, and motivate.
Great! Now abolish laws that restrict the TYPE of weapons you can carry without a permit!
👊🏼
Thank you sir!
Thank you for the work you do.
First one here
NOT 😂
@@nozthegreat5545 was the first view.
Guess I didn’t get it in time lol
@@koffiarizamoto9326 🤣
Your the man. Thanks for being here.
Amen, brother! Keep on doing what you do! You do outstanding work and it matters so very much!
Thank you!
Thanks, Colion -- love your content.
Great video! I appreciate your work!
I don’t know if you’ll see this in the sea of comments man, but I’m going to put it out there.
I found one of your videos in 2020 discussing gun laws. At that point in my life, I was on the other side of the fence when it came to firearms and gun control. They had never made sense to me; and I never imagined I’d support 2A, let alone own a firearm.
I watched one video. You made good points. I watched another. Ended up going down a rabbit hole and realized my lack of education on the subject was the issue. You changed my mind. Found your video on the SR9, got the SR22 as my first pistol in 2021, (wanted smaller cal for practice and price per round was cheaper) eventually worked my way up to the AR platform. I sit here now with the knowledge I’ve gained by listening to the other side for a change.
Just know, when it feels like nobody on the other side is listening. You changed my mind, and I’m grateful for it.
Point and case made!!!! Thank you!
Thank you . Thank you for all that ya do
Great commentary Colion, sensible explanation with factual backup. 👍
Thank you young man. Keep up the good work.
Great vid Colion!
Funny how my CPL (WA concealed pistol license) has had zero impact on my competency as a shooter, or responsibility as an individual. My training was watching Paul Harrell videos, as well as the US Army Marksmanship Unit's videos, then applying what I learned at the range. I have never had formal training in guns, but I've built my own rifle without a kit, and I reload my own ammo (nobody taught me how to handle explosives; just use common sense and read your reloading manual).
I'm a certified range safety officer (RSO), and that just means I received 2 days of training to learn how to open/close and operate/maintain the shooting facility, as well as how to treat gunshot wounds and rattlesnake bites. People always assume RSOs are trained in firearms, but our training is entirely focused on making sure people are shooting safely and using range approved ammo.
I know for a fact I can shoot a man-sized target out to 1,000 yards, and again, my "training" is just independent study, then applying what I learned.
I think the reason anti-gun people insist on this credentialism bullshit where you need to "prove yourself" is because they themselves do not understand that independent study is a thing, and they are projecting, assuming that because they are incompetent, so must everyone else be incompetent unless some government bureaucrat (who's likely never used a gun) give them a piece of paper saying otherwise. It's the college idiot, the mindset that you couldn't possibly know something unless you took institutional classes for it. It's the mindset of stupid people incapable of and unwilling to learn independently. They never learned to learn, so they don't understand how someone like me is more qualified to have a concealed firearm than your typical police officer whom likely has no idea how to service their firearm, and likely only shoots when it's mandatory of them to qualify.
The most embarrassing thing I've seen at a gun range was when I was visiting my friend in Chicago, and we went to the shooting range. The guy in the stall next to us was an off-duty cop, and he experienced a malfunction (double-feed). he was struggling to clear it, and i could hear his elbows whacking the divider, so I peeked around to see what was going on. I showed him how to clear it (he didn't know you're supposed to drop the mag), and after thanking me, we got to chatting, which is how I learned he was a cop. He got real uneasy when he learned I'm from out of state and didn't have a FOIA card, because he saw me carrying one of my buddy's gun cases when we went past the stall, and he was like, "That's illegal! You don't have a FOID card! Out-of-state residents can't transport firearms!" I told him to chill, that I was a RSO. His tune immediately changed, and thought I was a firearms expert or something. SMH.
Thanks Colion
Great video sharing this misconception ❤right on 👊
Thanks for the video 👊🏻🇺🇸
Well done my pro gun advocate ✊🏾✊🏾✊🏾🇺🇸 and you are right on the subject that u are-talking about and let’s keep America tactical 🇺🇸👍✊🏾
Thank you brother
Love it! Keep up the awesome work sir.
Thank you for using my comment!!! U da man colion!!!
Great information!❤
Hey Colion, you should have "I will not comply" state specific shirts. I would definitely but one for Washington state.