Design of Axially Loaded Short Rectangular Column | Rectangular column Design | RCC Column Design

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 жов 2024
  • Detailed Steps of Axially Loaded Short Rectangular Column has been explained, the column is short rectangular column which is axially loaded and is solved by considering minimum eccentricity as per codal provisions of IS 456-2000 along with design of lateral ties.
    The Clauses of IS 456-2000 along with page numbers has been shown clearly.
    Link of Axially Loaded Short Square Column : • Design of Axially Load...
    Link of Axially Loaded Short Circular Column : • Design of Axially Load...
    Checkout What is Column, Axial Load, Uniaxial and Biaxial Bending : • What is Column | Axial...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 43

  • @ravinandandr8886
    @ravinandandr8886 4 роки тому +5

    Best lecture seen in structural pages.👍👍

  • @harendrapaltomar3480
    @harendrapaltomar3480 5 місяців тому

    Thankyou sir for such an amazing content with such an awesome dedication

  • @mytinyfoods798
    @mytinyfoods798 2 роки тому

    Thankyou so much sir, your lectures are very helpful for me 🙏🙏

  • @marova._.chhangte7351
    @marova._.chhangte7351 3 роки тому +1

    Nice lecture and very informative and knowledgeable...

  • @anandgor4181
    @anandgor4181 Рік тому

    Very useful and informative video thank you.

  • @mr.engineer3314
    @mr.engineer3314 3 роки тому +9

    b = 400mm is wrong. When u put b= 400 in the equation, l/500+b/30, we get, e= 22.33 and 0.05×400= 20. e(min) > e(max) not OK.

    • @sh.joyshankersharma9611
      @sh.joyshankersharma9611 3 роки тому +4

      Bro, here we need to consider e min as 20 because if it exceeds 20 we consider e as 20, and if it is less than 20 then we consider the gotten value.

  • @mahmoodabdullah4547
    @mahmoodabdullah4547 4 роки тому +6

    You explain clearly thank you sir
    But still I have doubts
    You changed breadth as 400mm, but you didn't check minimum eccentricity with this formula (l/+500 + b/30) why
    You changed depth as 450mm, but you didn't check minimum eccentricity with this formula (l/+500 + d/30) why

    • @structuralanalysisanddesign
      @structuralanalysisanddesign  4 роки тому +2

      As it was not satisfying the axially loaded criteria it has to be designed as eccentrically loaded column, but after this stage i had considered 20mm as minimum eccentricity and solved as axially loaded column.
      Academically we can solve like this but practically the column has to be solved as eccentrically loaded column

    • @mahmoodabdullah4547
      @mahmoodabdullah4547 4 роки тому

      @@structuralanalysisanddesign eccentricity loaded coulmn means long column? Or different one

    • @kshitijpatil9305
      @kshitijpatil9305 3 роки тому

      @Picture Perfect Studio bhai tu photos click kar jaaa

  • @halalmeatshophk
    @halalmeatshophk 2 роки тому +3

    Sir u made a mistake.
    In the IS 456 Clause 39.3, it says that "A.c." in the formula is "Area of Concrete" but at 05:37 you have taken it as "Area of Column".
    Please confirm if "A.c" is "Area of Concrete" or "Area of Column", thank you.

  • @sanjibsaha2315
    @sanjibsaha2315 3 роки тому +2

    In case of determining the Asc u have considered the new Ag but in case of circular column u considered Ag as the calculated one not the new one(after increasing diameter) why sir is it limited only for circular column pls explain sir...and beside this thank u so much sir for explaining the numerical s and sharing ur knowledge..

  • @farookali6693
    @farookali6693 3 роки тому

    Nicely explained thxs.

  • @SoumalyaBaag94
    @SoumalyaBaag94 2 роки тому

    knowledgeable video. Provide more. Is there any video on Load calculations of a house? if had, please give me the link. Thank you

  • @soibamkhagemba8245
    @soibamkhagemba8245 4 місяці тому

    when you take d as 450mm emin aint 20 its greater than 0,05d . so its not satisfying . please explain this

  • @TheChampionPushpendrarj
    @TheChampionPushpendrarj Рік тому +1

    Watching it @ 12:40 AM

  • @vvbvb094
    @vvbvb094 4 роки тому +1

    Can you upload the design of combined footing with eccentric loading?

  • @dhavamanikrishnan293
    @dhavamanikrishnan293 4 роки тому +1

    Sir, Please explain about ductility calculation for column and beam. If you done please provide the link. Thank you.

  • @yangchinlhamu210
    @yangchinlhamu210 3 роки тому

    Nicely explained sir👍🏻 sir can you tell in which cases we are supposed to assume 1%of steel. Becoz I have seen in some cases they aren’t using 1%of Steel.

    • @kwalicks
      @kwalicks 3 роки тому +1

      when dimensions are not given

  • @bishwashbartaula9452
    @bishwashbartaula9452 3 роки тому

    Sir why number of bars is not multiplied with area of steel of 1 bar as u did in square column?

  • @debangangoswami7092
    @debangangoswami7092 Рік тому

    sir why dont you mention about spacing of longitudanal bars , is it not neccessary to specify it

  • @ojaswinikammili7489
    @ojaswinikammili7489 3 роки тому

    Sir can you tell me what we have do when the dia in lateral tie is 2 mm which dia bars are used

  • @sonukumar-bp4wb
    @sonukumar-bp4wb 4 роки тому

    Sir can I provide lapping in shear zone in any box culverts type structure

  • @kezangtobgay8601
    @kezangtobgay8601 3 роки тому

    is the assumption , b=D÷2 , compulsory ? can we take other ??

    • @halalmeatshophk
      @halalmeatshophk 2 роки тому

      it is just an assumption that was analyzed and failed. So second assumption was made later.

  • @Javid_111
    @Javid_111 2 роки тому

    ❤️

  • @earthbees
    @earthbees 4 роки тому +1

    Sir please put on a videos for stair design

    • @structuralanalysisanddesign
      @structuralanalysisanddesign  4 роки тому +1

      Soon i will try to upload it, right now focusing on columns, after columns surely i will upload

    • @earthbees
      @earthbees 4 роки тому

      @@structuralanalysisanddesign waiting for your next design of column.... Please quickly uploade it

  • @civilideas1925
    @civilideas1925 2 роки тому

    👍🏻

  • @ParthaPratim-xc9ir
    @ParthaPratim-xc9ir Рік тому

    I dont understand why in Re Design we will take b = 400 . Someone please answer this 💢

  • @Javid_111
    @Javid_111 2 роки тому

    Sir sorry to say... little bit u r skipping..... otherwise superb

  • @abhinavashish1807
    @abhinavashish1807 3 роки тому +1

    abe galat krr rha hai...emin ki value to change hoga na

  • @aizen9462
    @aizen9462 Рік тому

    Sorry to say but Wrong explanation.

    • @prof.pravinspatil1727
      @prof.pravinspatil1727 Рік тому

      ua-cam.com/play/PLtElM8k8rEY2QYenIfyVW-_lZmw3S1pKu.html

    • @Busyguy1119
      @Busyguy1119 6 місяців тому

      What is wrong in this can u please explain?