Why China's Type 095 Submarines Will Be America's Nightmare
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 кві 2023
- How will the Chinese Navy employ its new Type 095 nuclear attack submarines in a Western Pacific conflict? Why are they key to Chinese naval strategy? This video addresses these questions.
Want to support the channel? - / eurasianavalinsight
www.buymeacoffee.com/navalins...
Tags: Chinese Navy, PLA Navy, Chinese submarines, defence, military, SSGN, SSN, nuclear attack submarines, guided missile submarine, Sui class, Type 093, Type 093B, Type 093A, YJ-21, pump-jet, submarine noise level, X-rudder, sonar, conformal sonar
If you enjoyed my video, please consider supporting me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/EurasiaNavalinsight
or Buy Me A Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/navalinsight
Big thank you to all current and past supporters!
Keep in mind that while this video focuses on the nuclear 095, China has a fleet of AIP and drone submarines for non-blue water defense.
THAT IS JUST WHAT I WAS THINKING ABOUT I BELIEVE THAT THE CHINESE SSN WILL BE SQUADRON FLAG SHIPS LEADING AIP SUBS
Keep in mind USA contained china in 1st island chain and USA has far more superior technology (USA invented technology, not chinese or russian copies)
@@user-mc2oc6jw9q Oh? If you look at VSTOL aircraft, the British were first to succeed. If you look at electromagnetic propulsion for submarines, again the British. If you look at the auto, it was Germany's Karl Benz, the airplane was Albertos Santos Dumont, a Brazilian, not the Wright Brothers. And, who was Albert Einstein? Einstein was a German born theoretical physicist. The list goes on, but what is also important is who improved on those inventions. Who made those inventions practical and usable, and there you will find quite a few Americans, no different than we find the Chinese today. The fact of the matter is that the Chinese lead the US in international patents today, and if you look at history, you will find that very early new ideas came from the Chinese where about half of the inventions from the Chinese were used in the developed world (Europe) to industrialize. A good book for you to read is "The Genius of China: 3,000 Years of Science, Discovery, and Invention" by Robert K.G. Temple (Amazon has it)
Good analysis. This is the only channel that give an objective analysis of Chinese naval capability.
Indeed and PLAN is underrated
^^This times 100x!
If this was a CovertCabal video, it would be something like, "well, the USA has a cargo plane that can destroy all chinese subs"
or something stupid like that..
@@johnsmith1953x well cabal has been known to shilling and spread misinformation. Sadly 90% of his audience are people who don't double check the information and take it at face value
Thanks friend!
They build their subs using commercial equipment 😅😅
What I don't understand is why the first and second island chains are referred to as "defense" lines, when they are clearly offensive in nature. There is nothing behind them that needs defending. In front of them is China and her vitally important trade routes.
The same reason the US Department of War was renamed to Department of Defense after World War II. The last time the US forces actually fought to defend the US homeland was the War of 1812, and even that was a war the US essentially started. So how do you justify 200 years of invading other countries "from the halls of montezuma to the shores of Tripoli"? Rebrand baby! It isn't just the 2 island chains across from China. All 700 bases worldwide and regular military intervention can all be explained away because they are "defending" America.
by expanding from 'defending America' to 'defending democracy', they basically have cover to initiate wars anywhere in the world.
Note that this even allows them to move against democratic countries, but simply labeling those countries as 'non-democratic'.
And they literally have done nothing to hurt chinese trade. China wants to benefit from freedom of Navigation laws, but be able to break those laws anytime they are they are in the way of their expansions
@@gups4963 Why do you think China is spending hundreds of billions a year on their military? Learning from the best is why. Nobody breaks international laws anytime they are in the way of their own national interests quite like the US. And nobody dares to say shit when the US does it. Why? Because of all those star destro- erm I mean carrier battle groups that are deployed all over to "keep the local systems in line."
@@gups4963 They are being set up to be able to blockade Chinas trade routes in the future. Your statement is like saying "This loaded gun that is pointed in your face has done absolutely nothing to you." Yet.
My ideal armament layout for 095 is 6X 533mm torpedo tubes and 24 VLS (8 in front of conning tower with YJ-18, 16 in the rear with CJ-10 cruise missile).
I do want a dedicated cruise missile sub like the modified Ohio class. Perhaps they can build a variant of the 096 and equip it with 64 VLS cells instead of 16 ICBMs.
Considering the progress they have made in a short time and the level of RnD and available technical skills, there’s going to be a 96, 97 and so all in short order.
Excellent analysis, I completely agree. There's a couple of additional things worth adding, the Type 095 gives the Chinese the ability to strike at the US mainland, even if only in a performative way, which would encourage the US not to hit the Chinese mainland out of fear of escalation. It also means that more US submarines will need to be committed to convoy duties and protecting naval bases, which limits their use in offensive roles. Since the USN does not possess any cheap DE subs, underwater defensive operations will have to be conducted by expensive SSNs, which is not an optimal use for them.
what makes u think they would go straight into the defensive? they hit the mainland and all hell will break lose 😂
If China takes down GUAM, Hawaii and several US mainland naval bases (like in Seatle, San diego) all have to made inoperable.
Japan's mistake in 1941 was to allow the USA rebuild ships from foundaries in the US mainland. China won't allow that.
@@nomore-ls1wt This is 100% correct. If China takes down GUAM, Hawaii and several US mainland naval bases (in seatle, san diego) all have to go bye-bye. Japan's mistake in 1941 was to allow the USA rebuild ships from foundaries in the US mainland.
China will be force to destroy all naval bases everywhere.
I keep saying this. China will need to destroy the ENTIRETY of ALL US Naval Assets.
Tons of people have the performant ability to hit the US mainland. China has had it. As the video explained you can’t send a new sub after a new sub. So no there will not be any USN subs tasked to hunting down the Type 095.
These subs are extremely important because like you said they have an ability. They have the retaliatory ability to fire nukes but more importantly they have the ability to wipe out aircraft carriers from a great distance and that’s an issue.
Finding the carrier is not actually easy. They don’t actually know the location and the US is combating these abilities in a much different way. They aren’t doing it with subs they are doing it by improving the range and stealth of their aircraft. Right now the issue is that China can strike an aircraft carrier from further away than a US jet can fly. Now we don’t know that the US can’t strike far enough or not to close that gap but that’s the current issue. The aircraft carriers have to stay away from these missiles and now all of a sudden the missiles are in locations that the US aren’t aware of because they are hidden.
That’s point really though… make it so that the US knows that if they attack they will likely loose carriers and that’s just something the US isn’t willing to do.
If in war, China must hit several locations in the US immediately. Langley, Virginia (CIA HQ) needs to be taken out asap.
Mostly people underestimate what China militaries could accomplish year by year.. "Don't get too comfortable till you're realising what's gonna haunt your dreams.." - mau tze dong
At this point in time nobody knows whether or not the Type 95 submarine will have the active stealth technology of sonars mimicking device installed, if it does, it will means type 95 will be invisible to the US submarine. My guess is the generation after the Type 95 will most likely have it installed.
Type095 has that and China is building 10 at a time now.
In fact, type 095B is already being built and nobody knows the capabilites of that next level sub.
If the Chinese ballistic missiles have a lot of decoys then they will be very hard to shoot down. Especially if the warhead has the ability to maneuver.
Why would you use decoys? If you're building an entire missile to act as a decoy just put a warhead in it and fire two missiles.
@@kapitankapital6580 web search for "missile penetration aids"
You first have to DETECT them to shoot them down. :D
And gliders traveling at Mach 25 gives you little time.
@@kapitankapital6580 no because the decoys can be inflated so for the same spot as another warhead you can put dozens of decoys that would all appear as warheads to the target. This way your actual warhead will hit
You guys all have it way wrong… right now you are specifically talking about nuclear weapons which aren’t what people are worried about in the immediate future. Those certainly do utilize decoys because they can fit decoys because the explosive yield vs weight of the warhead is significantly higher then that of conventional explosives and kinetic penetrators. There really is no point in doing decoy conventional warheads and beyond pointless to have a decoy of one of the “hypersonics”. The cost difference just isn’t there where as the cost difference between a real nuke and a fake nuke are gigantic and you can fit plenty of fake nukes on a ballistic missile.
It’s not the conventional explosive warhead that costs money it’s the missile and guidance packages. So anything that would look real needs to be real because it might be the one that gets through the defenses.
Russians already are building Yasen-M that is even quieter than Virginia.
good
According to you
@@pooferfish2850 according to actual military experts. just because you, a stinky ukron*zi loving neo-n*zi says it isnt true doesn't mean it is not true.
Given what that Russian hypersonic missile did to the bunker in Ukraine there's nothing in guam that would survive a barrage of maneuvering hypersonic missiles launched from the mainland
Agreed.
Guam outta df17 range…
@DJ Tan with China's newer fractional orbital weapons nowhere on earth is out of range
I know. and then followed by a barage of cruise missiles from the chinese mainland.
The 095s would be bored to tears with nothing to do!
I suspect the 095s would be actually near the US coastlines on the West and EAST coastlines.
@@jiokl7g9t6 FOBs are very expensive, cheap, large rail guns on the mainland firing unstoppable "rods-from-god" is where its at,,,
Great video, very informative, watched to the end.
Mr Mendick?
ua-cam.com/video/LfcFQj-el2E/v-deo.html
Yes, i would argue that the best use for these nuclear attack submarines is as a fleet escort and as a USN ship sniper.
What means for USN? United States Navy??
@@user-ye6zk3ud3k yes, United States Navy
Good English. Good and factual .
The US thinks anything that challenges their standard of living is a threat, so the very fact that China is developing their economy is is viewed as an attack on the US. In their minds, launching nukes to protect their unilateral global order is defensive.
Within the 1st island chain I've always thought that a large fleet of AIP subs controlling packs of drone subs would be a more cost effective option.
Yes. I agree. Especially the sea bed around these area are relatively shallow.
Diesel AIP subs are the most suitable.
They will patrol off Australian n Guam waters... with the advantage of nearer to the 1st Island chain defence.. rather than the US/Australian.
Underwater drones do not work well unless under A.I. Control. Radio waves do not propagate well in water.
@@davidjames1063 attenuation in sea water is definitely an issue; the question is whether comm cables are viable and up to what lengths.
@@davidjames1063 China is using quantum-entanglement receivers/transmitters.
These subs could be in the middle of the sun and you can still receive/transmit information.
Look it up.
The first and second island chains are not defensive. They surround China and are aggressive, thousands of miles from US homeland hiding behind the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. China is very aware that US blockaded Japan before it was forced to attack Pearl Harbour. China is dependent on importing raw materials and exporting manufactured goods via shipping which has to navigate choke points like Mallaca straits, which are easily blocked by US. Thats why China is trying to develop the Belt and Road Initiative, which enables trade via land routes. The Northern Sea route will also enable trade via use of Russian nuclear icebreakers. US is determined not to let China trade and grow its economy. The wars are mainly in the Belt and Road countries. As sanctions were put on Russia, US will sanction China, which will devastate the whole world economy. Russia is self sufficient while China depends on trade. Nuclear war seems inevitable.
China will soon have no money from imports and will eat its own citizens , another session of "flesh banquets" as in the past. Look it up
While I agree with most of what you have written one of the main things to consider is that most of it is pure Western thought on the subject and is derived from a long tradition of making these claims. Like the "choke points of Mallaca" . You are aware of the belt and road and the Northern route but a war with China in which they need a Northern route to trade would be trading with whom? Europe? Just like the idea the US Navy needs to protect shipping lanes? From whom China? Protect Chinese exports from the Chinese navy? If there were a blockade it would hurt Japan and Australia far more than China. After US failure in Ukraine, China has secured all the natural resources it wants via Russia. All the oil and all the raw materials it will ever need and all at discount prices paying half of what the open market pays. Germany and Euro economies will be finished within another year or two. Losing all to China who can manufacture at 1/4 the price. Biggest failure in US history. The fight will start over something small but both China and the US are aware the winner will dictate the next 100 years. China will wait as long as possible as every day it play into their favor.
@@TP-ie3hj it's whoever gets the upper hand. if the US can control the trading routes, when there comes a time, the US sees necessary, it will blockage the routes for China but not other countries. It's about who has control not about who's trading more in those routes today.
Japan also failed to stop America's production of new new ships.
I think after China wipes Guam and Pearl Harbor off the map, many shipywards in the USA will be glowing.
Will that start a nuclear trade? Maybe, but I don't think so. The rich in America and EU won't allow it.
After China neutralizes the USA ability to make ships, I think the war will end that day.
Who has control, not who is trading more? 🤔 \_0_/ He just told you China is securing its trade via land. 🐘
All surface vessels be it commercial or military are vulnerable. Obviously with the US being so far away, they are more vulnerable to being blocked. 🐘
2+2=4 🐘
It's why they're panicking in DC. What used to be a geographical advantage economically and militarily is now a disadvantage:
The US mainland is naked to devastating strikes by conventional weapons, not just nuclear, and it is vulnerable to being isolated economically. 🐘🐘
The US are most likely pursuing a regional nuclear option via Israel, to destroy the Middle East and damage the New Silk Road. This is in addition to the constant barrage of regime change operations across the continent, the world, essentially. Disruption is their main strategy. That includes nukes. What would deter that is if some country would point their nukes at the US in response to Israel. I'm sure the US is working to avoid that to contain the conflict to a regional war. Otherwise it's standard protocol for the nuclear countries to strike non-nuclear countries, the logic being that they don't come out on top while the nuclear powers are destroying each other. A nuclear war could also result from diplomatic fumbling via the Middle East.
Superb Video Eurasia Naval Insight, can I request you to make video on the topics of Electronic Warfare ?
I think it will deploy around Taiwan and also set up a defence line against the USA boats from pearl harbour an guam
If China takes down GUAM, Hawaii and several US mainland naval bases (in seatle, san diego) all have to go bye-bye.
Japan's mistake in 1941 was to allow the USA rebuild ships from foundaries in the US mainland.
YOu can't allow that once GUAM and Hawaii are gone.
These are not offensive assets. Well at least as far as the US is concerned. These are defensive and retaliatory assets.
If we are talking about using them against non nato targets like India or someone else then that’s a different story. China will not have the ability to take an offensive role against the US. The US is the only country that can fight outside its boarders on its own.
China just wants to make sure the US could not fight China and win which is important. What everyone needs to worry about is that a force strong enough to ward the US off is a force strong enough to go after India and other small countries and China is showing a ton of aggression in that region. As long as everyone is uparming and nobody thinks they can pull a Putin and win I think we will all be fine.
@@MrGivmedew stfu, Biden fan boy
CCP subs are notably noisy, easy Pickens
Imo, 095 represents the strategy chance for PLAN. It forces the USN put more resources on the secound islands chain instread of the first. The USN would have to increase its budget significantly if they still want to defend both islands chains sufficiently.
in startcraft2, it'd be like having 2 medevac hanging behind enemy base, it streches the defense, it does not need to attack, simply being there cost enemy more resources to defend.
Not really, everyone thinks the Type 095 (which isnt even built yet) will force the us to change and more heavily defend their bases in guam and hawaii, what you guys forget is that we are not alone, the us recently made a agreement with australia which will sell 2 American made Virginia class submarines to Australia and so did the UK, this means that the aussies can now patrol the waters aswell and monitor china not only that they have access to the submarine technology of 2 nations. Lets also not forget the south koreans, the japanese and the indians, patrol those waters and feel threatened because China has made for herself way more adversaries by claiming man made islands. I dont think Us strategy will change much if this submarine were to be made.
@@nomore-ls1wt well, one of the reason PLAN did not invest too heavily on nuclear subs is that, within first islands chain, the waters are shallow, and cover with sonar sensors. good luck entering it. nuclear subs are designed to operate in deep waters, remember the uss connecticut hit something in scs? lol.
forget about south Korea, if they join, they'd be busy with the North. North Korea is not equiped is the common agreement between China and SK that they'd stay out. Japan's only hope become normal country is war breaks between US and China, they'd standing behind the, ready to back stab both, you really believe the Japaness are enjoying US occupation and listen the US for over 70 years? since when Australia is on the table. that's quite funny. Stop bringing your cheerleaders into the war and pretending they actually counts.
@@nomore-ls1wt india is not an industrialized country. They can buy weapons, buy using weapons bought from all over the place, already created a logistics nightmare in peace time. in war times, if is gonna be a total disaster. They can't even produce their own ammunition. Thats under the assumption that they are willing to join, but in reality, they just paying lip services for your aids, lol.
@@nomore-ls1wt You forgot to mention that China takes just 2 years to build a brand new aircraft carrier versus more than 12 years for the USA to do the same. Most of US aircraft carriers are going for retirement very soon. More importantly, USA military industrial complex has much difficulties to produce a new aircraft carrier in 12 years. China will catch up very rapidly. I don’t place any hope in Australia, Japan, SoKo and even India. They are not reliable! USA is on its own foot.
I won't be surprised to see the 095's right outside the Seattle, Hawaii and San Diego Naval Bases.
Excellent informative and well-structured video.
China might consider a higher production rate to counter the rising American threat level.
Twenty or so Chinese SSGNs could handle Guam, but you might need more, armed with true hypersonic missiles, to ensure a peaceful defeat of the American Navy..
He has other videos one of which you may like is about the ship yard in Bohai which is all new state of the art and massive. It has the ability to manufacture 20 SSN or SSBN at a time. Its HUGE.
Will the hypersonic glide vehicle play an important role in the attack on Guam. They are able to zoom in from any direction due to their unpredictable flight pattern. Just a thought.
The type 095 is really for bases on the US MAIN homeland (Seattle, Norfolk, etc)
Guam and Hawaii are easily handled by the 093B subs.
Thanks
Hey, thanks so much friend!
China needs the same number of nuclear submarines as NATO for self defense. This is a high priority. China needs the same number of nukes as NATO for self defense. This is a high priority.
This is more important than surface ships.
What would be interesting is comparing the training and experience of both nations. The US has been operating Nuclear subs since the 1950s, taking a look at the histories of their respective sub programs would be well received.
so true. just like usa been handling iss (expired soon) the there must be considerable different between international space station and chinese space station
The US has been fighting jihadists in the past 20 years...Look what happened when they faced the Russians in Syria😅
@@tonypeterson5316 enlighten me, what happened
@@emacstac R u serious? Russia beat the crap out of the USA and regained most of the territories that were stolen from the Syrian government. Once the US face super powers like Russia and China, they will use their vassal states like Ukraine and Japan as shields. USA is only tough when they fight the jihadist, not when against super powers.
@@emacstac Can u explain why the US hasn't sent their troops to help Ukraine against the Russians?
Talk about SSBN type 096, the SSGN type 095 will escort the SSBN type 96?
Wao..great info abt China's 095 Sub.. agreed that this nuke Sub should be positioned beyond the 1st island chains
No one asked why China's coast is the first island chain of the United States?
can you do a review on the current modernization in southeast Asia? Like Indoneisa, Malaysia and the Philippines?
and the possible course of it in the future?
Is this an update of the previous video?🤔
Does it matter?🧐
@@user-dc1ud6px3s Yh . that's why i asked
I can’t get enough of his videos.
they will sound like a marching band when they are in the ocean
What would be the effect on the US base of Guam, if a Poseidon torpedo exploded off its coast with a tidal wave of 500 feet or meters and at a speed of 200klm per hour?
Thank god the sea floor is littered with microphones
Again training and experience…..do we really think that at the moment this first 95 is launched we will have something tracking it and developing an acoustic signature? 50 plus years of playing the deadly game with Russia has given the US REAL blue water experience!!!
Russia China allies
MANY small subs are better
than 1 LARGE subs.
5 man crews hunt in packs are formidable
🎵🎶🎵Bye bye American Lie (Pie ) LOL 😂😂😂
China builds weapons for defense. The US build weapons for offense. The advantage is always with the defender.
The sun in the west is setting.
The sun in the sky is red
Communist Party propaganda bullshit
Communist Party propaganda bullshit
这玩意哪里来的资料啊，095好像除了一个尾部分段图片之外，也没看到啥别的资料啊
别问 😏
The 095 can used to attack the US carriers .
LACM are not useful for the PLAN submarines; land- and surface-warship- based hypersonic maneuvering missiles will do; especially fractional orbit hypersonics. It's a non-moving target after all.
The problem is that once a submarine launches a missile we know where they are. Just how fast can they sprint away after firing?
What's required for PLAN submarines are long range hypersonic anti ship and anti submarine missiles - targeted by drone subs.
I will expect that the type 095 will be equipped with the PLAN's UVLS and those should be able to launch the hypersonic missiles.
Like the Virgina with Tomahawks. Buying a Ferrari, then putting a Ford Motor in it. Stupid. Tomahawk launches will be a beacon for hypersonic ASM's. That Tomahawk is easily decoyed/ spoofed, and shot down, is laughable. " We put that in, because we HAVE nothing else ".
@David James I've been thinking about a delayed launch mechanism: program the Missilewith the target location, release the Missile to slowly float to the surface while the sub sprints away, ignite Missile when it breaks the surface.
@@davidjames1063 in theory, because tomahawks have >1000km range they can be fired far enough that they won't be spotted and the sub has enough time to escape after firing.
But yes their effectiveness is highly questionable because they're relatively easy to intercept.
Your videos are a auto watch and auto like for me.
I'd love to see you model out a Taiwan Straits scenario. I know you don't like to discuss politics but you can focus on just the military dimension. You'd do a better job than those CSIS people for sure.
Oh , it's pronounced "ar Keh peligo" the ch is a k sound because it's Greek.
Thanks friend! I'll have a think
Well done China Super type 095 most advanced powerful submarines in the world. 🇨🇳
cannot wait for the 003 to start sea trial, it has been quite awhile already...
Discrete or Discreet Communications?
Rewarding $100,000, seeking one example of China impeding the "freedom of navigation" for commercial vessels, just one will suffice. I dare not offer the same reward for the United States, as I would instantly go bankrupt.
Logistical supplies to Guam, Japan, ROK and Taiwan can be facilitated by CARGO SUBMARINES.Type 95 is no problem.
I expect China to ramp up production of undersea transport subs designed to go from the mainland to very near Taiwan’s shore … and capable of quickly releasing landing forces or drone swarms after surfacing, then submerging and returning to the mainland or rendezvous point. Low cost high production rates because they are strictly short range battery powered, not high speed, deployed for only 24 hour duration, minimal crew, never deeper than 50 meters, and no systems for other functions than transportation.
Bright idea
@@pxy24x28 it’s so obvious, it must be happening even if nothing is said about it.
are you secretly a bond villain?
@@douginorlando6260that's actually very plausible. Smuggling while safe from radar detection and air attacks
Is it better to use 095 to destroy and attack each other's main cities and industries? It's not necessary to hit a nearby fortress.
Lol. I see you did some more research after our last discussion.
Good video overall, though I'm surprised by the emphasis on multiaxis attacks - saturation from a single threat vector might be more practical. By concentrating attack platforms you can reduce the probability of underwater communications being detected - and alerting the opponent.
I'm not sure that SSGNs can safely attack moving targets with long range missiles - long range sonar is not remotely accurate enough for a viable weapons track at hundreds of kilometers, while poking your comm equipment through the surface to get fire control updates from satellites (it's very doubtful other platforms are able to provide data so far into the American controlled Eastern pacific) is extremely inadvisable with the capability of modern AWACs.
An E-2C operator stated he was able to detect an Italian periscope peeking through wavetops at over 200 kilometers during the Cold War, and the modern E2-D is considerably more capable. Whilst modern submarines have stealthy features built into their photonics/electronics mast, even surface scarring (from poking mast through waves) produces a radar signature that can be recognized today.
So in a wartime scenario, an SSGN may be ordered to surface for offboard guidance against high value targets - for example, carrier or amphibious groups, but I don't think the PLAN (or any navy) is going to routinely put their SSGN at risk to attack cargo ships.
(This is assuming China hasn't made massive advancements in high bandwith underwater datalink - and of course if America found itself sufficiently outmatched in orbital reconnaisance-fires complex it does have the option of resorting to ASATs)
Hey, thanks so much!
I think the main problem with underwater communication has less to do with alerting the opponent of an attack (would be hard to figure out what is being communicated anyway), but more to expose the submarines to detection. Gathering all the submarines to fire from a single location is good for saturation, but without discrete underwater communications, it would be hard to time them right so they don't arrive piecemeal anyway. Surface launch is out of the question for obvious reasons.
Most SSGN-launched missiles are not for attacking moving targets at long range, that is true. But the YJ-21 is reportedly guided by the Beidou navigation satellites, and in theory all that would be needed is long-range detection of some sort, without necessarily the ability to track real time on the part of the 095.
Can't china just produce cheap decoys that produce fake waves making their detection useless. There will be dozens or hundreds of periscopes and wakes in the area. In reality they can all be fake and the real sub not even in that group of decoys.
Well done China Super in building advanced powerful 095 Submarine armed with powerful missiles. 💪💪👏👏👍👍💯💯❤❤
Thus the importance of quantum communications and its development for China.
*Always a great videos!*
You play both sides with no bs.
I don't know why you don't have at least over 100k subscribers....
Can you do video on "if" all (or most) chinese fishing ships are engaged in a battle?
"Never under estimate 100,000 fishing boats with millions of surf-air, surf-ship, surf-land, surf-sub MANPADS"
🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳💪💪💪💪💪
At 15:11, I believe you meant enemy fighters instead of Chinese fighters. Also, I'm not sure why land-based SAM systems are a threat against submarines.
As in these assets stop opposing ASW aerial assets from being used against china subs - so I did mean chinese fighter and SAMs
God I hate the use of the word "potential" In terms of determining cababilities of Materiel.
Potential is the correct word because in real life there are uncertainties
@@EurasiaNaval I know and I understand , and please do not think I am going after you personally. Overall you make very good videos with good info. Many other channels uses "potential" aswell. And I dont like it there as well. It´s like saying "we dont really know, but if!". or Potentially it can do this and this, but probally it cant.
Potentially the Armata on paper was the best tank in the world and it was´nt when built.
Potentially the Admiral Gorskov frigate is the deadliest frigate in the world , but considering the pisspoor performance overall in the russian navy , the lack of fundings and raging corruption its performance is probally only average at best.
I just like facts rather than speculations. Thats all im saying. It´s got nothing to do with your channel only. It´s an overall problem whenever something new is being made or "potentially" being made.
@@clausjensen5658 Thanks for clarifying why you dislike the word. I can see where you are coming from.
@@clausjensen5658 On some self-reflection, I think I'm becoming a little too easily defensive or reactive... It's because not all the comments are as reasonable as yours, and the negative ones sometimes get to my head. I'll try to adjust my mindset in the future. Take care!
@@EurasiaNaval No worries , I could only imagine the stuff you have to read from the comments. I could´nt do it as calmly as you do. Keep up the good work on the videos. It´s rare to see an actual unbiased informative presentation these days and you do it better than most.
These are off the west coast of the USA
Why amerika always afraid of china's defence equipment????....while china sees america as calm.....😂😂
☠️☠️☠️ WARNING ☠️☠️☠️
💪💪💪💪💪👏👏👏👏👏
IMO they'll be mostly anti-surface & ASW platforms; could also carry ISR UAVs in their VLS tubes. If/after the Taiwan issue is settled, would be ideal for patrols in the Indian, Atlantic & Arctic Oceans. They could be based in S. Africa, Argentina, &/ Nicaragua/Cuba; MREs can sustain them on extra long missions. ua-cam.com/video/qEUaqhz5tvY/v-deo.html
祖國萬歲萬歲萬萬歲💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪
1967 😂😂😂😂😂
The advantage of China's military weapons is certain. The West weaponry was built of yesterdays technologies and China's weaponry is built with todays technologies
Our nuclear power is used for defense strikes not to bullying or invade other countries
Yoo
Well done China Super building the most advanced powerful 095 Submarine in the world. ❤💪💪👍👍👏👏💯💯❤❤
Why does dc need a base in Guam? defending dc? Lol
Tactics, one of the same reasons China built islands, (that are now sinking by the way).
@@emacstac like the three gorge dam ur kind predict it collapse every year?
@@lastchangdepapa1247 LOL .. "My kind" - grow up. It's a well known fact that some of the Chinese man made islands are sinking, not all of them; but some of them. That's not the point though, we have a massive military presence in Guam for the same reason why you want one past the 1st Island Chain. The naivete of some of these videos though, when taking into consideration the defenses of Guam are grossly understated. The US military's tells you only what it wants you to know to create a false sense of security
The poor people of Afghanistan are so protected by the NATO forces.
They enjoy Western freedom, democracy, free-speech, free health-care, free education, provided by 20-years of occupation.
To grab china by the balls
BEST TAIWAN INTO CHINA👍😎
Oh please. The Swedes surround them till they rise.
That would not be smart for Sweden fighting for the Englanders.
You didn’t say block 5 Virginia Class submarines! Did yeah we just launched one this week
They will never make a better and more powerful submarine as long as America exists, this is mission impossible.
Wew
I love that everything you’ve said is based on a submarine where the first one hasn’t been made and doesn’t take into account any superior submarines of Chinese rivals.
Given the rate of submarine innovation in China and technology innovation, I would not make that statement. If anything, as the Russian deployment of hypersonic missiles has shown, there are some technologies that the US is behind in now.
Off the topic.
How to repel/deter Chinese invasion of Taiwan?
Submarine is the most feared platform in modern naval warfare. It can sink/cripple a destroyer size surface combatants. It can also repel/deter any amphibious operation particularly in the future China-Taiwan conflict. That is why Taiwan needs to bolster its underwater capability/submarine warfare by acquiring coastal submarines around 120-500 tons. A single coastal submarine operating in littoral/coastal waters has high probability of sinking/crippling any surface combatants or any military transport ships conducting amphibious operation. I think that's the best platform for Taiwan defense strategy.
unless taiwan has mastered unmanned underwater systems which neither the US or China has, midget subs have historically been death traps for their crews.
Before you make this comment, did you check the average depth of the Taiwan Strait, and is it suiatable for submarine warfare? The depth of most areas in the Taiwan Strait is only 30-50m depth, any submarine can be easily seen by airborne patrol. The east side of Taiwan is better, but the PLAN knew that already. Remember a few "waters" around Taiwan were declared as restricted zones by the Chinese authoriy as "Military Operation Zone" in early August last year, the one in east Taiwan was heavily bombarded by various kind of live weapons. That means the Chinese knew that area is the ideal nest for foe submarines.
@@eagol And Before you reply to my comment, did you read and understand it well?
Coastal subs are intended to operate in very shallow to shallow waters where amphibious operations will likely to occur. Plus any ASW platforms including airborne assets will be vulnerable to shore-based defenses such as aerial kamikaze drones, anti-ship missiles, and surface-to-air missiles.
@@nieljosephpalca7849 my answer to your comment is simple and direct, DREAMING ！
@@eagol Then so be it.
China
😅😅😅😅😅😅 gaya.gaya nman gawa nila
Chinas submarines are all way behind and catching up to the USA. Whilst china is building new subs the USA is simply upgrading to the next level gen in Subs projected. As per usual China is between 80 - 40 years behind and will stay that way as Chinas GDP closes down over the next decades... Its people will go back to rice growing and and trading will start to cease.. where will they get their coal?? and extra rice? and Iron..? The US will buy all the Australian Extra Iron ore to offset this problem..
You are right, China are way behind the Western world or USA in term of military or killing machines, you are absolutely right! History of mankind also showed the Western world and the white has been invading the world since a few hundred years ago. e.g. Portugese in 16 centrury invading Asia, then Spain, then UK (till today, they still colonized other people's land such as Falkland Island of Argentina), French, German even better, launching WWII. That's the reason the USand the West in general, are more superior in weapon making! While China is 80-40 years behind like you said. But while China chose to build infrastructure in foreign land, the West build weapon and bomb, and do the "Shock and Awe" to world which is far from them, till today!
Try name one country that's invaded by China in the last 50 years? Oh, I think China have invaded Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria, right? How many military base US has in the world and surrounding China? I believe China has 500 military base surrounding US or Europe, no? I concur, US and the West are more superior and intelligence........... in destroying other! Enough said!
once the us dollar is gone from world trade the US.will have to print monopoly money and will be too broke to worry anyone ..and it has been proven the US tech is way behind ..the yanks under estimation will be their downfall ...they haven't won a war in 60 yrs despite starting most of them ...and running away from some ..they don't even know what a woman is ..
Keep up your thinking...you hv no idea how much China hv caught up...they lead in 37 out of 44 future tech...while USA is already incapable of educating her youth...China graduated more STEM students..every year then all the NATo countries combined ! Go to any top American University...Asian topped every batch of graduates....😊
still dreaming😂
Poor analysis with your anti-China ideology in your mind.
They will never make a better and more powerful submarine as long as America exists, this is mission impossible.Some things are written in the stars.
LMAO. White superiority?
Judging from the pace of increasing Chinese military power, it would be tough even for the United States to contain China in Asia Pacific region. It must be very important for the United States to strengthen military cooperations with Japan, Australia, India and other democratic states to stop China`s aggressive expansionism.
lmao expansionism, last I check China didn't invade any sovereign nation, meanwhile USA and UK has 800+ military bases all over the world, Russia and China has less than 50 combined lol, and who is who provoking Russia and China and Nokor in their own backyards?
Hey amigo. 1 n 2nd chains r already dead turkey. Don't run ur propaganda
Try it !
Dont forget to close the hatch of your sub-marine😂😂😂
@@taiwanstillisntacountry - You're an idiot. It only happens in Indian sub.
@@taiwanstillisntacountry Don't forget to clean up your US master's poop you Taiwan diaper bag.
You are tripping ! Tomb on the battle of the ocean 🌊 these subs are 20 years behind US Submarines- will find out soon sign up get in one
so much ignorance in these comments from people who think they know what theyre talking about, im disgusted at how this video ended up in my feed its propaganda
Are you pro-American? You don't think that those pro-American channels are propaganda?
Ofc im pro american, I will support my country. However I know when to question information even if its with regards to my own nations tech and weapons, all the channels i follow to get my information from link their sources to support their claims, this video here is just claims about the capabilities of a submarine that isn’t even built yet, even its own government hasn’t released information with regards to the ship that could be credible. If you look at the definition of propaganda its misleading information used to promote a point of view, which this channel does exactly. And yes of course there are pro american propaganda channels out there but like here I will always question and look for the sources of their information, I am not a easily influenced person such as yourself. I feel pride for my people with facts and not cheap videos just saying its gonna be better over and over without giving us any true evidence on a submarine that isnt even built yet.
This is great Chinese propaganda. All this means is the Virginia Class and future Virginia class submarines will continue to be MORE quiet than anything the Chinese or Russians can produce. U.S. sonar will continue to be superior to anything those two(2) navies can produce. If that wasn’t the case, the U.S. Navy would not continue to build them and would develop a totally new class. The U.S. is at least- two(2) steps ahead of her adversaries.
I agree that China won't ever overtake us submarine tech unless it rapidly increases its annual military spending from its current 2% of total GDP to match US military spending of 3% of its GDP. I would even argue that the CCP needs to double their military spending to 4% or even triple to 6% of the total GDP if they want at all to outpace the US and its Pacific allies. spending 50% of the world's defense budget annually does gets the US and its allies some sophisticated military equipment even if there is a lot of waste.
@@rdiddyspace1708 China catches up ONLY because of what military plans it can steal from the U.S. military. We must be vigilant in protecting what prevents us from being run over by Chinese thieves.
Yah sure ,,it's made in china
Can't and won't even match american firepower and technology.
@johnquinn456 Stay mad, stay jealous, stay buried🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
They don't hv to...they hv enough to protect their sea ..American carrier group would be able to go any near..enough to launch aircraft!
just look superior for weak country😂
CH!NA NEEDS : 12 UN!TS SSBN, 16 - 20 UN!TS SSN, 9 - 12 UN!TS A!RCRAFT CARR!ERS AND 24 UN!TS TYPE 055 HEAVY DESTR0YER!!!