Having the most technological 5th gen aircraft in the world means we dont need catapults. Our ships actually sail the world, yours are too scared to leave the SCS. LOL When exactly are you going to invade Taiwan? The tiny island less than 100 miles from your shore that you cant capture? lol
@@kendonian357 Fifth generation? ? Let’s take a look at China’s sixth-generation fighter jets. Our ancestors told us 3,000 years ago that there is a better way than war
@@kailiu2734 LOL 6th gen? You communist fools see a black jet flying and you all melt. You haven't even produced a comparable 5th gen aircraft yet. The J-20 has been picked up on radar at distances slightly better than western 4th gen fighters. Its not 5th gen. and if you cant master 5th gen you certainly cant master 6th gen. I cant believe how brain washed you Chinese are, your so different that the Chinese people living in the west, your run by a dictator in a communist society with a credit system that rules your life. Your infrastructure collapses daily because you cant build anything correctly, but you want the world to believe you have designed a 6th gen aircraft? LOL. That thing would be eaten alive by a F22 and F35. Wake up
Really? The QE is a carrier. The 076 is a helicopter landing dock. The fact that you'd even compare the QE to a dramatically smaller and less capable class of warships is really telling.
Soon the US Navy will copy the Type 076 design to replace the American class LHA, just like they copied the Type 055 to replace the Arleigh Burke III(DDGX). Unfortunately, the difference between the two countries' ship-building capabilities is vast.😂
Why would USN copy a design even the Chinese are not building a second hull due to design limitations. Don't get me wrong each of these successive single class are better than the last but not good enough even for the PLA to invest more to the class.
@@hillbillysceptic1982 because trials are very rigorous and aircraft landing and takeoff is usually one of the later if not last steps of the sea trials? it's already done dead-loads, they work, so cope harder I guess.
I like how the PLAN always states their ships as 10k something tons, 40k something tons, 60k something tons, just like how their rocket force states their rocket as 300KM, 400KM something range.
because in Chinese - Large Number is cumbersome to pronounce in english we say like -> 15.000 be "fifteen-thousand" in Chinese they pronounce it -> 1.5000 "one ten thousand - 5 thousand" so they tend to like rounding up the big numbers into singular unit
Our decimal units are ones, tens, hundreds, thousands, millions, billions, trillions, etc. This is why digits are grouped in threes: 1,000,000,000,000 In Chinese, there is an additional 10000 unit. It isn't called ten-thousand. Well, it could be, but it has its own name. Just as in Indian languages, there is a 100000 unit with its own name (lakh) and a 100 lakh unit (crore). They are common in Indian text written in English and the Indians use it like everybody knows what those units are. Which people in India probably do. 😂
@@thehumus8688 Bro it's totally wrong. 150000=fifteen wan(15 x 10000), 15000=1.5wan(1.5万). In daily life we don't say "ten thousand", like you don't say "ten hundred". "10k tons" is easier for western world, in Chinese news they say 万吨(wan dun). Large number is never hard to pronounce in Chinese, but super super hard to pronounce in English. 10 thousand =wan(万), thousand=qian(千), hundred=bai(百). So you can see, Chinese versions are always easier.
I really enjoy your analysis videos. Could you make a video summarizing China’s military power in 2024? I hope this video includes all the new equipment added to the PLA this year.
@@MrBdoleagle I am not a participant in any organization’s military think tank. I am simply a military enthusiast. If you are asking which think tank has the most understanding of the current PLA, I would suggest looking at the U.S. Department of Defense’s “Rebalance to Asia-Pacific” report or the “2024 U.S.-China Report.” Both provide detailed insights. However, these reports are extensive, and extracting key information can be challenging. Therefore, I want to use this UA-camr’s analysis to understand the situation more quickly and easily.
Don't compare modern day China with the Ming Dynasty. The Way the Ming collapsed at the end was just embarrassing. The Romans had this say. Whenever an Emperor was an adopted son, he ended up being a good Emperor. Whenever an Emperor succeed by birth he was a disaster. The problem with China is that the emperors that established each Dynasty were great emperors, but whenever their children took over their reign eventually it all went downwards from then. Thank goodness the CPC does not have succession to children.
China doesn't have bases around the world like the United States so it wont be able to dominate the world oceans like America did. Its clear though too me now China is the most power single country in the world now. America however has plenty of super powerful friends thank god. I'm happy for China they deserve greatness in modern times .
That’s right, they tested two different 6th generation fighter and one AWACS(KJ3000) and one drone WZ-9 and one drone gj-11and one amphibious landing craft in same day
@@wuhui with EMALS and arrestor cables, any combination is possible, chopper carrier, drone carrier, fixed wing carrier... in essence she's as big if not bigger than the French carrier charles de gaulle which can carry 30-40 planes....
Keep in mind 076 is LHD first, internal space taken up by well deck and vehicle bays. Single CAT on straight deck points to heavy UAV low tempo deployment. US LHDs can fit 6 jets with 2 jets rotations. Lightning Carrier has got rid of well deck just to fit 10 more.
China's navy is getting stronger by the day, the powerful fleet reminiscent of the great dragon armada of the Ming dynasty of the 15th Century China. China's LHD 076 is a worthy carrier of large helicopters, drones and VSTOL aircraft to support landing and near shore missions.
The reason for the distribution of the three short range AA missiles (two at the back end of the ship, one over the main bridge), is because these are the optimal positions. 360 degrees coverage and at the same time protection from sea spray when launching at high seas. The ciws guns are less affected, so they have the usual distribution. Overall, a most impressive ship.
I assumed that with the well deck gate at the rear of the ship, the ship would have its stern facing the shore, i.e., the most contested zone when the landing craft is released, which would then make sense that the point defence covers the stern more than the bow.
It is good that China does not go to the route of STOVL and instead go for EMALS even on its LHDs. No point in crippling your fighters and drones just to take off and land on a small flattop when you already have advanced EMALS to do the job.
Yeah STOVL.actually crippled the fighter jets as the middle fan took a lot os space and burns a lot of fuel to hover. China emals free up spaxe in F35 stealth fighter.
@kendonian357 the f thirty five b, it's a big compromise versus the a variant. The email's capability makes aircraft, such as the f thirty five b redundant, which is why in the future, it's unlikely the u s will have such a thing because steam catapults had a lot of compromises, all of which emals eliminate
i hope they will build 3 to 4 of these. 076 is to me, the most modern and advance looking war ship china has ever built. 055 was great too, from certain angles.
It will be dependent on the PLAN's assessment of the ship. If it meets expectations they'll build quite a few of them, if it does not they'll only build a few. This is how the 076 came to be; the type 075 was insufficient so they only built a few and instead invested in the 076 project. The 055 went through the same process, originally only 8 ships would be built, however it has surpassed expectations so now they're building 16.
Yeah, the south China sea. Too scared to sail anywhere else. 45% of the Royal navy is currently at sea.You would know this if you educated yourself and engaged your brain.
@@kendonian357Well technically the dry dock is somewhat connected to the sea so yeah the failed design aircraft carriers that will be soon sold or scrapped do not really sail anywhere
That’s right, they tested two different 6th generation fighter and one AWACS(KJ3000) and one drone WZ-9 and one drone gj-11and one amphibious landing craft in same day
3:40 New joke about 076's stern 1130: Pilot: hey, why i'm not getting ILS signal ATC: oh, the ILS is currently out, but don't worry, i just ordered the stern 1130 to lock onto you, you can follow the radar warning receiver indication for your approach
The 076 amphibious assault ship can provide a base for the Marine Corps to move forward in the aircraft carrier formation, and can also eject unmanned early warning aircraft, unmanned attack aircraft, and even unmanned tankers. At the same time, it can also be used as a backup take-off and landing base for the aircraft carrier formation. . In short, it is an extremely powerful backup aircraft carrier.
"A base for the Marine Corps" -- Yes "To move forward in the aircraft carrier formation" -- Not likely It is designed to operate as a floating military base for military intervention in low-intensity conflicts.
They concentrated the onboard air defense at the aft end of the ship because they think that is the direction that an attack will come from when the ship is running away from a fight. Tell us what the Chinese navy thinks of their chances will be in combat. Well played China.
The reason for the distribution of CIWS in the back is not because how the ship is placed in the fleet formation. It is because it is a LHD that needs to protect also the landing crafts that it is launching in the back closer to the beach.
It seems to me that China changes something for each ship they build. We will know they have found their final form when they build several of them, perhaps simultanously.
You make a claim that the QE class are never out of port yet they both have made deployments, HMS Prince Of Wales in the Atlantic, Baltic, Arctic and the Mediterranean. HMS Queen Elizabeth made several Atlantic crossings and completed a global deployment to the South China Sea in 2021.
If you tell the US marine corp that their America Class can carry F35C instead of F35B, which allows to carry more fuel and weapons, they will throw F35B to rubbish bin in less than one second. How did China come up with the idea that putting electromagnetic catapults in a LHD ship? Genius design.
Different EM catapult system design, or better design. The US uses high Voltage AC power for their catapults which requires a lot of power generation at one time. That's why they can only be installed on Nuclear power carriers. China uses mid voltage DC power with huge capacitors which uses less electrical power at one time, thus can be installed on conventional powered ships such as the 003 aircraft carrier and this 076 LHD ship.
That’s right, they tested two different 6th generation fighter and one AWACS(KJ3000) and one drone WZ-9 and one drone gj-11and one amphibious landing craft in same day
The PLAN needs 4 Supercarriers and at least 8 of these type 076 class ships. That would give them 3-4 carriers available at anyone time. Considering the USN only had 4-5 modern carriers that can operate F-35's, USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70), USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72), USS George Washington (CVN-73), USS Gerald R Ford and (CVN-78), and USS America (LHA-6), USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) is unknown, potentially can, potentially cannot, that would give the PLAN an advantage as the USN cannot concentrate all of its available carriers in a single theatre.
Does the choice of names (after provinces) and the big commissioning event suggest that the PLAN consider this vessel of equal importance to the carriers? The CIWS is impressive. The only problem with having so many overlapping systems is deciding when to shoot which system at what target.
I thought about the placement of the point AD weapon systems, but I think the thinking is that if a a missile is approaching from the front, then the ship will be doing manuvers anyways, so each side has at least 2 CWIS (one in the middle and 1 the rear) and it will have 2 missile launchers along with chaf counter measures on each side. So at pretty the ship can always turn to make it face at leas 2x of each system.
No It WILL N O T have ...... Manned-aircraft, but instead rotary and UnManned aircraft!! Here's why I think so..... Look at video at time ( 9:40 ), Right Behind and little left corner of rear island is a hole in the deck with railing around it.... I'll get to that in a moment. (And I Bet there is a similar shaped hole on the port side...... [ ~ 11:53 ......RIGHT Behind the blue topped shed!!! ]) If You look closely on the deck where there look like two (2) people on the flight deck...one close to the edge and another Right In The MIDDLE of the FD (flight deck), there are NO Arrestor Wires!! So you will Not be landing J-15Ts on that ship, but instead drone aircraft. Why??? Again, look at that Hole I mention...It LOOKS like the shape of a "Barrier System" that USN uses on Their A/C (aircraft carrier) FD! It is used in case of some sort of emergency of the plane, where it will "Crash into the Barrier"...a series of vertical straps held UP by the craning of the barrier. This would make More sense, because you Don't want to keep "Crashing" an a-c (aircraft) into a barrier all the time. But for a drone, it COULD be fixed ~rapidly~ (??). As for the USN barrier system, sure it would damage the a-c, but the pilot would survive with assistance of FD crews. So I am thinking the catapult will be for ....... DRONES!!! Not manned a-c. USN Veteran 20+ years experience.
A ship like the Type 76 LHD (or new Italian LHD Trieste) might be what Brazil needs to replace the São Paulo, as a light CATOBAR installation on a 40,000-ton LHD would allow the Brazilian Navy to use domestic combat aircraft like the Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano or the proposed Saab JAS 39 "Sea" Gripen. STOVL And a LHD would provide Brazil amphibious capability, ideally they would build at least two, preferably three, ensuring (unlike the QEs, the RN needed 3 of them) that one would always be at sea.
PLA is known for taking "quick, small steps" in the development of its weapons, including warships. If Captain Zhang were correct that the Type O76 is intended to carry and launch the J-15, then where is the angled flight deck with the second catapult? Will that only come with the next iteration of the Chinese assault carrier - the Type O77?
It was a dark day for the folks in Sichuan, they say over there, because this 076 is not a full nuclear powered aircraft carrier, according to recent posts in some Chinese social media.
13:10 thank you for saying this so many armchair experts underestimate China and it’s capabilities and that will bit them in the ass Excellent video overall been a subscriber for some time very good info and great presentation.
Would be cool if you make a video on Admiral Kuznetsov, I would love to know why Russians have so many issues with it while Shandong and Liaoning are so reliable
@@gaobilitrue to some extent, though Russians modernized and refit Kuznetsov several times thought it always seems the same problems happen, makes me think there must be more to it, but of course funds and capabilities of workers are on a different level in China
This may be my favorite carrier design ever. Yes, it’s not the biggest, but I just love the look. Love the straight rectangular shape. 🇨🇳 LOOK AT THAT 01:44. Beautiful!!!
Very objective and factual presentation of 076, particularly like your comments about UK’s half dead aircraft carriers. We should credit to UK that invented many of the technologies and techniques vital to the carrier and its operation today. Happy new year.
I am not a China fanboy. My country is one of the country that have overlapping claim in S.C.S. But I have to admit I am agreeing with Type 076 design as an amphibious/drone carrier. I guarantee you US will also develop their own LHD/ Drone carrier after this.
HOW is that even comparable? the french one is very small ship around 20000 tons and very old system and only can carry helicopters, and it is not a carrier, it is a old LHD, 076 is close to 50000 ton carrier with EMC catapult, with all sorts of jets and big drones and landing boats, it is even larger than french only carrier Charles de Gaulle
Far beyond the two frenches. 076 has a electric-magnetic catapult, latest technology for launching both drones and fixed-wing aircrafts. Furthermore, even British HMS doesn't have this kind of catapults, so it has much shorter operation range the 076.
2024 is busy in china military world. new biggest aircraft carriers in china history, biggest landing ships, new J15T, J35, new 6th generations prototype, et.
I really like this guy. I wonder what personality type he is. He's very analytical and honest. You can get great analysis when you have Fe suppressed by Ti like an INTP, which I am. That's a STOVL flight deck design on something of that tonnage, which is a bad idea. The British invented angled-out flight decks. There should be an angled-out flight deck and a CATONAR design. A slightly smaller USS John F. Kennedy or USS Kitty Hawk (last CV carriers) design is what it should have been. They put the worst possible flight deck they could on those things STOVL. Even if they didn't go CATOBAR, they could have gone STOBAR. There's probably too much Collective narcissism from the West for them to put abstract reasoning and critical thinking into play and understand when they possibly could have. When people see those comments from them, they need to understand what it is. That's actually Collective narcissism.
076 is a copy of the QE? Only if it breaks down all the time. The Chinese must be pretty damn confident with their EMALS tech to have them on board 2 classes of ships in quick succession.
I don't understand why they don't use an angled deck design if they will operate fixed wing aircraft ? This is asking for catastrophic accidents if they fail to catch the wire.
@ex0duzz The angled design creates a separate runway for catching planes. You can catch the plane and move it off to the side and reset for the next plane. Where are you going to park the plane so it's out of the way? This is more like a helicopter/VTOL ship than a true aircraft carrier conducting continuous operations.
Having more catapult than the entire Royal Navy fleet… that is pretty funny.
It also has half as many catapults as the entire European Naval force combined.
Royal Navy has no catapult
You really understand mathematics😂
and indian navy
Meanwhile in india navy kept having accidents and sinking. The next china indian news have it
Well done China. Make Asia great again!!!!
MAGA
By bullying its neighbors like Japan and the Philippines? Sure sounds great 🙄
exactly, can't let Asia be overtaken by the west
except for the pinoys and indians
謝謝！
Thanks friend!
China has more catapults on the Type 076 than the entire UK navy.... 😂
lol I laughed hard at this one. The UK navy is non existing
Having the most technological 5th gen aircraft in the world means we dont need catapults. Our ships actually sail the world, yours are too scared to leave the SCS. LOL When exactly are you going to invade Taiwan? The tiny island less than 100 miles from your shore that you cant capture? lol
@@kendonian357 Fifth generation? ? Let’s take a look at China’s sixth-generation fighter jets. Our ancestors told us 3,000 years ago that there is a better way than war
@@kailiu2734 LOL 6th gen? You communist fools see a black jet flying and you all melt. You haven't even produced a comparable 5th gen aircraft yet. The J-20 has been picked up on radar at distances slightly better than western 4th gen fighters. Its not 5th gen. and if you cant master 5th gen you certainly cant master 6th gen. I cant believe how brain washed you Chinese are, your so different that the Chinese people living in the west, your run by a dictator in a communist society with a credit system that rules your life. Your infrastructure collapses daily because you cant build anything correctly, but you want the world to believe you have designed a 6th gen aircraft? LOL. That thing would be eaten alive by a F22 and F35. Wake up
@@kendonian357 bro since when British have their own 5th gen aircraft…
The 076 definitely isn't a copy of the Queen Elizabeth.
The 076 actually functions.
Do we really have to go through this? All they did was put a cat on the QE! Without the actual skills of the QE.
@@Hellfox777 hey why don't you bring QE out for a fleid trip to test it out eh
@@Hellfox777cope
@theredbar-cross out of all the languages that you chose to speak you chose to speak you chose to speak facts.
Really? The QE is a carrier. The 076 is a helicopter landing dock. The fact that you'd even compare the QE to a dramatically smaller and less capable class of warships is really telling.
Soon the US Navy will copy the Type 076 design to replace the American class LHA, just like they copied the Type 055 to replace the Arleigh Burke III(DDGX). Unfortunately, the difference between the two countries' ship-building capabilities is vast.😂
Why would USN copy a design even the Chinese are not building a second hull due to design limitations.
Don't get me wrong each of these successive single class are better than the last but not good enough even for the PLA to invest more to the class.
不觉得他们有相应的预算和快速跟上的能力。国会连建造新的安东尼奥级都不批准。何况PLA自身也要试验下这种船型的有效性和使用方式。个人猜测美国海军会仔细观察，但不会马上行动。
You meant to say FORTUNATELY right? the US ship building capability doesn't even come near South Korea, much less CHINA
The ship is useless to America’s Marine Corps. Where are the STOVL aircraft?. Another poor chinese copy.
@@hillbillysceptic1982 what for when they have emg catapult😂
type 003 fujian is now on her 6th sea trail this afternoon.
Lustig wäre es wenn sie 003 in 20 Januar in die marine geben
And still hasnt launched a single aircraft from its catapults. I wonder why?
@@hillbillysceptic1982 I wonder why the Chinese have to tell your their military info. Would you like to share some of yours?
@@hillbillysceptic1982 because trials are very rigorous and aircraft landing and takeoff is usually one of the later if not last steps of the sea trials? it's already done dead-loads, they work, so cope harder I guess.
@@hillbillysceptic1982 可能因为现在在建造004,005航母，需要多次航行测试积累经验，等这两艘航母下水可以更快服役吧
I like how the PLAN always states their ships as 10k something tons, 40k something tons, 60k something tons, just like how their rocket force states their rocket as 300KM, 400KM something range.
because in Chinese - Large Number is cumbersome to pronounce
in english we say like -> 15.000 be "fifteen-thousand"
in Chinese they pronounce it -> 1.5000 "one ten thousand - 5 thousand"
so they tend to like rounding up the big numbers into singular unit
Our decimal units are ones, tens, hundreds, thousands, millions, billions, trillions, etc. This is why digits are grouped in threes: 1,000,000,000,000
In Chinese, there is an additional 10000 unit. It isn't called ten-thousand. Well, it could be, but it has its own name.
Just as in Indian languages, there is a 100000 unit with its own name (lakh) and a 100 lakh unit (crore). They are common in Indian text written in English and the Indians use it like everybody knows what those units are. Which people in India probably do. 😂
+sumthin sumthin km... Hihihi
@@thehumus8688 Bro it's totally wrong. 150000=fifteen wan(15 x 10000), 15000=1.5wan(1.5万). In daily life we don't say "ten thousand", like you don't say "ten hundred". "10k tons" is easier for western world, in Chinese news they say 万吨(wan dun). Large number is never hard to pronounce in Chinese, but super super hard to pronounce in English. 10 thousand =wan(万), thousand=qian(千), hundred=bai(百). So you can see, Chinese versions are always easier.
@@xinrangao9550Chinese is way harder.
I really enjoy your analysis videos. Could you make a video summarizing China’s military power in 2024? I hope this video includes all the new equipment added to the PLA this year.
If you work for any military think tank, $1.99 is really a great deal to collect valuable info from China
Thanks friend, I have a similar video for the PLA Navy coming up
@@MrBdoleagle I am not a participant in any organization’s military think tank. I am simply a military enthusiast. If you are asking which think tank has the most understanding of the current PLA, I would suggest looking at the U.S. Department of Defense’s “Rebalance to Asia-Pacific” report or the “2024 U.S.-China Report.” Both provide detailed insights. However, these reports are extensive, and extracting key information can be challenging. Therefore, I want to use this UA-camr’s analysis to understand the situation more quickly and easily.
@@EurasiaNaval look forward to
Best $2 ever spent❤
China will rule the waves, like China did during the Ming Dynasty.
Don't compare modern day China with the Ming Dynasty. The Way the Ming collapsed at the end was just embarrassing. The Romans had this say. Whenever an Emperor was an adopted son, he ended up being a good Emperor. Whenever an Emperor succeed by birth he was a disaster.
The problem with China is that the emperors that established each Dynasty were great emperors, but whenever their children took over their reign eventually it all went downwards from then. Thank goodness the CPC does not have succession to children.
@@danwelterweight4137 You think the US is going to last forever?
I actually genuinely agree with you @@Ace1000ks
U hv a point.@@danwelterweight4137
China doesn't have bases around the world like the United States so it wont be able to dominate the world oceans like America did. Its clear though too me now China is the most power single country in the world now. America however has plenty of super powerful friends thank god. I'm happy for China they deserve greatness in modern times .
6x J35, 4x J15T, 2x J15D will be a very formidable assault package
That’s right, they tested two different 6th generation fighter and one AWACS(KJ3000) and one drone WZ-9 and one drone gj-11and one amphibious landing craft in same day
For this ship? I thought it’s amphibious assault ship? Wouldn’t it be outfitted more often with helicopters amd drones?
@@wuhui with EMALS and arrestor cables, any combination is possible, chopper carrier, drone carrier, fixed wing carrier... in essence she's as big if not bigger than the French carrier charles de gaulle which can carry 30-40 planes....
no that's too much weight. This will emphasize helicopters and drones more
Keep in mind 076 is LHD first, internal space taken up by well deck and vehicle bays. Single CAT on straight deck points to heavy UAV low tempo deployment. US LHDs can fit 6 jets with 2 jets rotations. Lightning Carrier has got rid of well deck just to fit 10 more.
China's navy is getting stronger by the day, the powerful fleet reminiscent of the great dragon armada of the Ming dynasty of the 15th Century China. China's LHD 076 is a worthy carrier of large helicopters, drones and VSTOL aircraft to support landing and near shore missions.
中国人没有称霸世界的野心，欧亚非大陆上已经没有国家可以对中国构成威胁，这就是中国发展海军的原因。
@@佯谬You are deceived
Good points! No to VSTOL though.... they are too expensive and don't perform that great.
@Amidat well helicopters are by definition VTOL vehicles. STOL are aircraft that can take off using the magnetic catapult system.
The reason for the distribution of the three short range AA missiles (two at the back end of the ship, one over the main bridge), is because these are the optimal positions. 360 degrees coverage and at the same time protection from sea spray when launching at high seas. The ciws guns are less affected, so they have the usual distribution.
Overall, a most impressive ship.
No, that's... you know what, sure, go with that.
@@Hellfox777 ouh yeah? why don't you tell us the reason?
I assumed that with the well deck gate at the rear of the ship, the ship would have its stern facing the shore, i.e., the most contested zone when the landing craft is released, which would then make sense that the point defence covers the stern more than the bow.
Range of defense weapons in few Kms can cover the length of carrier even if place at back.
@@pohmoh3590 difficult if it's skimming and shore launched missiles, etc.
I'm Asian American and I SUPPORT CHINA
the backbones of asians oversea are actually dependent on the strength and influence of the prc unfortunately.
当心大翻译运动告你的洋状😂😂😂
@mmm...
Go back to Asia !!
I actually agree with you @@noriakikakyoin6557
BASED
It is good that China does not go to the route of STOVL and instead go for EMALS even on its LHDs. No point in crippling your fighters and drones just to take off and land on a small flattop when you already have advanced EMALS to do the job.
Mainly because China's electromagnetic catapult has entered overcapacity...
Yeah STOVL.actually crippled the fighter jets as the middle fan took a lot os space and burns a lot of fuel to hover. China emals free up spaxe in F35 stealth fighter.
@@yours_sincerely48 You cant develop a STOVL. Its that simple. The F35b can take off and carry a full load out to 500nm. Its not crippled at all.
@@kendonian357失败者
@kendonian357 the f thirty five b, it's a big compromise versus the a variant.
The email's capability makes aircraft, such as the f thirty five b redundant, which is why in the future, it's unlikely the u s will have such a thing because steam catapults had a lot of compromises, all of which emals eliminate
i hope they will build 3 to 4 of these. 076 is to me, the most modern and advance looking war ship china has ever built. 055 was great too, from certain angles.
I think the Chinese plan to build 3 more of these LHDs.
I was thinking 4-6
It will be dependent on the PLAN's assessment of the ship. If it meets expectations they'll build quite a few of them, if it does not they'll only build a few. This is how the 076 came to be; the type 075 was insufficient so they only built a few and instead invested in the 076 project. The 055 went through the same process, originally only 8 ships would be built, however it has surpassed expectations so now they're building 16.
076 can actually go to sea unlike the Royal Navy.
hahaha, i remeber the article about parking one of their ships probably one of few existing due to difficulties😅
Yeah, the south China sea. Too scared to sail anywhere else. 45% of the Royal navy is currently at sea.You would know this if you educated yourself and engaged your brain.
@@kendonian357Well technically the dry dock is somewhat connected to the sea so yeah the failed design aircraft carriers that will be soon sold or scrapped do not really sail anywhere
@@tomaskulik80 educate yourself. It's not difficult, even for you.
Come on hurry up China is releasing new toys faster than you releasing new videos
That’s right, they tested two different 6th generation fighter and one AWACS(KJ3000) and one drone WZ-9 and one drone gj-11and one amphibious landing craft in same day
@@gulijim8080 how the hell are you knowing all this quicker and clearer than me who is a CHINESE? wtf......
@@galahadrayhe probably also a Chinese
@@galahadrayyou are out
@@zhangmike1308 我被开除中国籍啦？谁给你说我不是中国人了？
3:40 New joke about 076's stern 1130:
Pilot: hey, why i'm not getting ILS signal
ATC: oh, the ILS is currently out, but don't worry, i just ordered the stern 1130 to lock onto you, you can follow the radar warning receiver indication for your approach
The 076 amphibious assault ship can provide a base for the Marine Corps to move forward in the aircraft carrier formation, and can also eject unmanned early warning aircraft, unmanned attack aircraft, and even unmanned tankers. At the same time, it can also be used as a backup take-off and landing base for the aircraft carrier formation. . In short, it is an extremely powerful backup aircraft carrier.
"A base for the Marine Corps" -- Yes
"To move forward in the aircraft carrier formation" -- Not likely
It is designed to operate as a floating military base for military intervention in low-intensity conflicts.
😄 that Royal Navy remark.
Likely operate smaller J35 than heavy J15T
They concentrated the onboard air defense at the aft end of the ship because they think that is the direction that an attack will come from when the ship is running away from a fight. Tell us what the Chinese navy thinks of their chances will be in combat. Well played China.
舰载型攻击11今天也有试飞照流出🎉🎉🎉
钓鱼的那个是吧？那个是几个月前就已经发出来了。
@@清德賴-v7q 原来几个月前就出来了啊？那更好啊。时不我待只争朝夕！
@@挺且直
你傻不傻啊。。GJ-11都服役多少年了。🤣阅兵上过的武器。全部是现役的武器。
@@清德賴-v7q 我是今天看到一张照片，说是海军舰载版的，可能懂行的是通过前起落架判断的吧。陆基gj11肯定早服役了。
还有廿
it might work with a carrier group to make up for sortie rate and provide additional utility by sharing workload of the carrier.
simply add a catapult on a LHA can be a simple but beneficial idea instead of design a STVOL plane
especially when fleet are short for carriers
This is a Christmas gift to the West, and don't forget the two sixth-generation fighter jets🎄🎄🎄🎄
Actually, this time China is reportedly displaying three aircraft, with one more in the west that hasn't been shown, and they are not the KJ-3000.😱
China has yet to produce a 5th gen on par with the F22 .... from 30 years ago. The 2 that were made public aren't 6th gen
@@emacstacYou are nobody in the first place😂😂
说句不好听的哈！中国现在完全看不上F22这种落后的装备。还有它掉一架没一架。@@emacstac
@@emacstac Get a grip bro things have changed.
The reason for the distribution of CIWS in the back is not because how the ship is placed in the fleet formation. It is because it is a LHD that needs to protect also the landing crafts that it is launching in the back closer to the beach.
Proud of the Chinese military
That is one fine looking ship. Could the fighter jets in the air wing be "mother ships" for the unmanned aircraft. Great stuff ENI!
It seems to me that China changes something for each ship they build. We will know they have found their final form when they build several of them, perhaps simultanously.
Only when it's something particularly new. When they're confident of something, even a new type like the Type 055, they build 8 of them at a go.
Wow, what an exciting time for the Chinese military! Two gen 6 stealth fighters test-flighted the other day and now this!
They will stop building 075 now they have 076 for drones warfare.
Just like how 075 replace 071
Great analysis, as always!
The storage shed on the deck is hilarious 😂
种菜的
❤那是电磁弹射
Lectromagnetic catapult
You make a claim that the QE class are never out of port yet they both have made deployments, HMS Prince Of Wales in the Atlantic, Baltic, Arctic and the Mediterranean.
HMS Queen Elizabeth made several Atlantic crossings and completed a global deployment to the South China Sea in 2021.
这些装备更多只是保护我们在地球利益不受损失而已！我们中国真正着眼点是地球外的资源，其他星球资源才是人类无穷无尽的资源来源！我们更希望大家把目光精力资源，投资到太空开发上来！这是人类唯一的出路！
bro did NOT hold back on the QE class 💀
great video as always!
If you tell the US marine corp that their America Class can carry F35C instead of F35B, which allows to carry more fuel and weapons, they will throw F35B to rubbish bin in less than one second. How did China come up with the idea that putting electromagnetic catapults in a LHD ship? Genius design.
Different EM catapult system design, or better design. The US uses high Voltage AC power for their catapults which requires a lot of power generation at one time. That's why they can only be installed on Nuclear power carriers. China uses mid voltage DC power with huge capacitors which uses less electrical power at one time, thus can be installed on conventional powered ships such as the 003 aircraft carrier and this 076 LHD ship.
@@laowantongchau Correct. Professional explanation.
India: It's copycat of western technology
US: Duck tape ship
Phillipines: Banana quality paper ship
Haha, love that dig at the Queen Elizabeth. The egotistical nonsense coming from some western “experts “ really does piss you off.
That’s right, they tested two different 6th generation fighter and one AWACS(KJ3000) and one drone WZ-9 and one drone gj-11and one amphibious landing craft in same day
The Chinese don't have a 6th Gen. fighter cuz they still haven't got around manufacturing 6th gen. capable engines.
@@marcusaureliusss China already has 6th generation engines, and two days ago there was a demonstration of a combustion engine
Wasn't it rumored that the Royal Navy was in negotiations to possibly selling one their Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers to India?
They will build more type075 obviously. Just like how theyre making type 052Ds and type 055, and type 054A and type 054B simultaneously
The PLAN needs 4 Supercarriers and at least 8 of these type 076 class ships. That would give them 3-4 carriers available at anyone time. Considering the USN only had 4-5 modern carriers that can operate F-35's, USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70), USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72), USS George Washington (CVN-73), USS Gerald R Ford and (CVN-78), and USS America (LHA-6),
USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) is unknown, potentially can, potentially cannot, that would give the PLAN an advantage as the USN cannot concentrate all of its available carriers in a single theatre.
Bro，你又得更新了，新预警机的相关内容！非常的科幻
Words don't hurt. The truth does. 😂 love it!
Brilliant insights. I learned alot!
1:45 A confetti ball dangled at the bow? That was a wine bottle.
Wow congrats 🎉
14:08, Built by FORD (Fix or Repair Daily)
Does the choice of names (after provinces) and the big commissioning event suggest that the PLAN consider this vessel of equal importance to the carriers?
The CIWS is impressive. The only problem with having so many overlapping systems is deciding when to shoot which system at what target.
I thought about the placement of the point AD weapon systems, but I think the thinking is that if a a missile is approaching from the front, then the ship will be doing manuvers anyways, so each side has at least 2 CWIS (one in the middle and 1 the rear) and it will have 2 missile launchers along with chaf counter measures on each side. So at pretty the ship can always turn to make it face at leas 2x of each system.
The 2 port-side 1130s have enough angle to fire forward.
It will always be defended by 054 052d and 055s nearby.
No It WILL N O T have ...... Manned-aircraft, but instead rotary and UnManned aircraft!! Here's why I think so.....
Look at video at time ( 9:40 ), Right Behind and little left corner of rear island is a hole in the deck with railing around it.... I'll get to that in a moment. (And I Bet there is a similar shaped hole on the port side...... [ ~ 11:53 ......RIGHT Behind the blue topped shed!!! ])
If You look closely on the deck where there look like two (2) people on the flight deck...one close to the edge and another Right In The MIDDLE of the FD (flight deck), there are NO Arrestor Wires!! So you will Not be landing J-15Ts on that ship, but instead drone aircraft. Why???
Again, look at that Hole I mention...It LOOKS like the shape of a "Barrier System" that USN uses on Their A/C (aircraft carrier) FD! It is used in case of some sort of emergency of the plane, where it will "Crash into the Barrier"...a series of vertical straps held UP by the craning of the barrier. This would make More sense, because you Don't want to keep "Crashing" an a-c (aircraft) into a barrier all the time. But for a drone, it COULD be fixed ~rapidly~ (??). As for the USN barrier system, sure it would damage the a-c, but the pilot would survive with assistance of FD crews.
So I am thinking the catapult will be for ....... DRONES!!! Not manned a-c.
USN Veteran
20+ years experience.
You are right
Well done China Superpower has launched one more New type 076 advanced powerful Aircraft Carriers 💪💪👏👏👍👍💯💯♥️♥️
Go, China go!☺
A ship like the Type 76 LHD (or new Italian LHD Trieste) might be what Brazil needs to replace the São Paulo, as a light CATOBAR installation on a 40,000-ton LHD would allow the Brazilian Navy to use domestic combat aircraft like the Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano or the proposed Saab JAS 39 "Sea" Gripen. STOVL And a LHD would provide Brazil amphibious capability, ideally they would build at least two, preferably three, ensuring (unlike the QEs, the RN needed 3 of them) that one would always be at sea.
巴西在南美洲足够强大了，没有竞争对手，没有必要在军队投入太多预算吧！除非巴西想走上世界舞台
PLA is known for taking "quick, small steps" in the development of its weapons, including warships. If Captain Zhang were correct that the Type O76 is intended to carry and launch the J-15, then where is the angled flight deck with the second catapult? Will that only come with the next iteration of the Chinese assault carrier - the Type O77?
It was a dark day for the folks in Sichuan, they say over there, because this 076 is not a full nuclear powered aircraft carrier, according to recent posts in some Chinese social media.
It is also noteworthy that Sichuan received a lot of greetings especially from neighbor provinces. Their chances to have nuclear AC remain 😂🎉
they don't know why? Sichuan was supporting Boxilai and president Xi remembered it.
我想要补充的是，这艘LHD搭载的坦克和装甲车也是无人的，珠海航展已经展示了这一点。
1130 now has AESA :)
It’s pretty interesting that every weapon system that China said it wanted it got while Russia is still developing its SU57 and cancelled its T-14.
Russian is kind of overpromising like Indian, while Chinese is like iceberg when they announce plans probably huge amount of work already completed
俄罗斯很想加强军事装备，但预算和技术又不足，本来俄罗斯在军事开发上与中国合作是最好的，但他们又放不下面子，苦苦支撑，当与乌克兰发生战争时，他们才感受到缺少现代装备的痛苦
13:59 a slow clap of respect for your brutally honest criticism of the UK's carrier "fleet".
I never imagine that China could make these beautiful ships. Is that real? That worried me so much.
Royal navy is kaput....e isso é muito bom 😊
13:35 and the shade of grey is similar
13:10 thank you for saying this so many armchair experts underestimate China and it’s capabilities and that will bit them in the ass
Excellent video overall been a subscriber for some time very good info and great presentation.
'China Tells Us....' Hmmmm. Good start :-)
Better than your country who is full of liars and have no bloody idea what they're doing
You can clearly see the influence of the British twin island design, same with Italy and their new Trieste.
Would be cool if you make a video on Admiral Kuznetsov, I would love to know why Russians have so many issues with it while Shandong and Liaoning are so reliable
shipbuilding workers, funds, equipment, thats it
因为现在的俄罗斯连最基本的战舰都造不出来，更别说是航母。现在的俄罗斯对于中国来说太落后了。
@@gaobilitrue to some extent, though Russians modernized and refit Kuznetsov several times thought it always seems the same problems happen, makes me think there must be more to it, but of course funds and capabilities of workers are on a different level in China
Have you heard the ship was mounted with electromagnetic railgun ?
Everyday is Christmas day in China. 2 stealth jets 1LHD. Tomorrow?
Continuous innovation.
That electromagnetic catapult joke is pure gold lmao.
你會看到彈射的視頻，不用擔心。
@sabrinadio No, I don't think the Royal Navy can launch one lol.
PLA is smart enough not to dump defense money into complex tiltrotor VTOL aircraft like the U.S. V-22 Osprey.
wow,, luar biasa tiongkok akhirnyha type 076
diresmikan, sukses selalu tiongkok
Zhungguo, jiaayooooo👍👍👏💪
China #1
Ohh here we go.
This LHD will be China's version of Japans Helicopter Destroyer. hence the 076 is a destroyer and not a mini carrier.
can you ski behind it ?
The innovation of the British in the integrated power system is quite impressive, and they will serve as a valuable asset for Chinese naval vessels.
This may be my favorite carrier design ever. Yes, it’s not the biggest, but I just love the look. Love the straight rectangular shape. 🇨🇳
LOOK AT THAT 01:44. Beautiful!!!
Very objective and factual presentation of 076, particularly like your comments about UK’s half dead aircraft carriers. We should credit to UK that invented many of the technologies and techniques vital to the carrier and its operation today. Happy new year.
其实，空警3000才是真正的未来空中力量！
I am not a China fanboy. My country is one of the country that have overlapping claim in S.C.S. But I have to admit I am agreeing with Type 076 design as an amphibious/drone carrier. I guarantee you US will also develop their own LHD/ Drone carrier after this.
13:20 Aw hell naw we found the individual who said that the Su-57 was just a reskinned Su-35. 😢
What happened to the Ka-52 deal?
Replaced by WZ-21, deal never happened
Is this ship comparable to the two assault carriers that France delivered to Egypt (after Russia wasn't able to take delivery)?
HOW is that even comparable? the french one is very small ship around 20000 tons and very old system and only can carry helicopters, and it is not a carrier, it is a old LHD, 076 is close to 50000 ton carrier with EMC catapult, with all sorts of jets and big drones and landing boats, it is even larger than french only carrier Charles de Gaulle
Far beyond the two frenches. 076 has a electric-magnetic catapult, latest technology for launching both drones and fixed-wing aircrafts. Furthermore, even British HMS doesn't have this kind of catapults, so it has much shorter operation range the 076.
2024 is busy in china military world. new biggest aircraft carriers in china history, biggest landing ships, new J15T, J35, new 6th generations prototype, et.
AND MANY DIFFERENT DRONES
@@wision888 AND MANY DIFFERENT ROBOTS
根据对升降机还有宣传图的分析，搭载的很有可能不是固定翼而是某型无人机，我更倾向于全长电弹是为了给航母做备份，以达到能运作固定翼的目的，起降战斗机应该不是常态，毕竟这是两栖舰，坞舱主要还是要用来放装甲车和人员弹药这些，但是说真的两攻上全长电弹，这个真的太夸张了，没下水之前我都在猜会不会缩短一点方便无人机同时起降
I really like this guy. I wonder what personality type he is. He's very analytical and honest. You can get great analysis when you have Fe suppressed by Ti like an INTP, which I am. That's a STOVL flight deck design on something of that tonnage, which is a bad idea. The British invented angled-out flight decks. There should be an angled-out flight deck and a CATONAR design. A slightly smaller USS John F. Kennedy or USS Kitty Hawk (last CV carriers) design is what it should have been. They put the worst possible flight deck they could on those things STOVL. Even if they didn't go CATOBAR, they could have gone STOBAR. There's probably too much Collective narcissism from the West for them to put abstract reasoning and critical thinking into play and understand when they possibly could have. When people see those comments from them, they need to understand what it is. That's actually Collective narcissism.
Soon the blue Navy will be ranked based on how many operational electric-magnetic catapults they have
076 is a copy of the QE? Only if it breaks down all the time.
The Chinese must be pretty damn confident with their EMALS tech to have them on board 2 classes of ships in quick succession.
PLA have already tested on groubd many yeara ago before putting it on the aurcraft carrier. PLA dobt show you, doesnt mean its not working 😂
중국의 목표는 결코 미국을 능가하는 것이 아니라 더 나은 중국이 되는 것이다.
I don't understand why they don't use an angled deck design if they will operate fixed wing aircraft ? This is asking for catastrophic accidents if they fail to catch the wire.
You are under the impression that planes will return to the carrier.
If they miss they just power through and take off and try again like what everyone else does for flattops.
@ex0duzz The angled design creates a separate runway for catching planes. You can catch the plane and move it off to the side and reset for the next plane. Where are you going to park the plane so it's out of the way? This is more like a helicopter/VTOL ship than a true aircraft carrier conducting continuous operations.
四川舰考虑的是多功能，多种组合的任务，是个多面手。在航母编队里，是作为配角角色，不需要持续出动飞机作战，那是航母去考虑的问题。制空作战时，配合航母放飞无人攻击机；对岛登陆时起降武装直升机、运输直升机和气垫床登陆艇，旁边航母来制空；单独处理低烈度任务时，带几架J-15T就可以处理拦截任务，费用比航母低很多。
搭载J~35更加划算，更加合理~
076 is China’s 4th aircraft carrier
Amphibious attach ship built with Taiwan, in mind.
Launch usually means it's in water. However, I guess for the China fans out there, this is close enough.
Why no angled deck design though?
See the shed above? It's an electromagnetic ejection trajectory, so it's a straight deck
Shield of Freedom in the Western Pacific!😉