Affordable SLS 3D Printing! Is Micronics Machine for You?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 лип 2024
- 🚀Head to squarespace.com/CNCKITCHEN to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code CNCKITCHEN.
SLS is the new 3D printing hype at the moment, and I had the chance to do an in-depth interview with Luke and Henry this year at @opensaucelive about their machine and what they will do after the Kickstarter is finished!
Check out our CNC Kitchen products at cnckitchen.store/ or at our global resellers www.cnckitchen.com/reseller
Micronics Kickstarter: www.kickstarter.com/projects/...
Formlabs Fuse 1+ (affiliate): geni.us/Fuse1
Other useful video around the Micronics SLS Printer:
@strangerparts • I wanted to love this ...
@3dprintingnerd • SLS 3D Printing AT HOME?
@AppliedScience: • Micronics SLS nylon 3D...
@Micronics3D / @micronics3d
💚 Support me 🙏
Patreon: / cnckitchen
Join as a UA-cam member!
Shop at Matterhackers(US): www.matterhackers.com/?aff=7479
Buy a Bambu Lab printer 🐼: geni.us/BambuP1S
Buy a Prusa printer: geni.us/CNCKPrusa
Shop at SliceEngineering: www.sliceengineering.com?p=rJPWEcsm_
Shop at 3DJake(EU): geni.us/zHvnB
PayPal: www.paypal.me/CNCKitchen
🎙Check out my Podcast with Thomas Sanladerer: / @themeltzone
Follow me on Twitter: / cnc_kitchen
Follow me on Instagram: / cnckitchenyt
Chapters
00:00 Introduction
01:00 Selective Laser Sintering
05:19 Sponsor
07:01 Why is the powder black?
08:59 Powder Degradation
09:44 What does the powder cost?
10:04 Who strong are SLS parts?
10:55 Print quality
11:47 Post-Processing
13:14 Safety Concerns
14:48 What's unique about Micronics Machine?
15:54 Unreal Engine 5 Slicer
16:39 After the Kickstarter
17:24 Making it Production Ready
#3Dprinting #SLS #Micronics
DISCLAIMER: Part of this video was sponsored by Squarespace.
FTC Disclaimer: A percentage of sales is made through Affiliate links - Наука та технологія
the physics simulation to pack models into the printing volume made me think about how some chaos is often needed to avoid local minima, and actually find the most efficient/stable configuration
if they haven't already, they should make sure to add a function to vibrate the simulation, as that might help it pack models more efficiently into the volume.
You can manually grab individual models and shake them, causing the settling you're talking about
@@maj429 yeah but that's not really the same thing, and also quite fiddly.
lol the physics engine for Unreal Engine is called Chaos
I mean in practice is pretty easy. And imo way easier than trying to algorithmically maximize it
Ironically, the physics system in UE5 meant to replace PhysX is actually called Chaos lol
While it’s true that you don’t need supports for SLS, you do have some design constraints to consider. For example, hollow objects need drain holes to allow the powder to escape. You also have process considerations, which doesn’t make it exactly enthusiast friendly. That said, I really want these guys to succeed and it’s amazing to finally see some more competition in this space.
Good point!
I have found with the Formlabs products that orientation absolutely affects the finished product. I can look at a part from any of our Fuse or Fuse 1+ printers and tell you what orientation it was printed in.
@@93Martin with 0.25 mm spot size and 0.1 mm layer height that would be about the quality of a FDM printer with a small nozzle so it’s not surprising that you can still tell it’s print orientation and potentially see layer lines.
Also some parts shown would be a pain to post process. On their cube example with all the different mechanisms, they show a ball joint, getting all the powder out of the ball joint would be a nightmare.
Sold out to Formlabs, almost had a option for consumers to have a SLS printer without breaking the bank. Thanks formlab for killing that dream.
They are probably going have best sleep in along time after the deal is over.
yeah im kinda mad too, i knew theyd just kill the project. shame
We need a boycott of form labs
I like the enthusiasm of the young engineer during his presentation. I hope their kickstarter is successful and this becomes the new standard for 3d printing.
my last kickstarter was for some shoes that detected your movement for VR. Unfortunately, they only delivered a few pairs an abandon most of us. And so many 3d printer Kickstarters were scams from the start disappearing with peoples' money.
Kickstarter was cancelled
@@Tedlasman Really? What a shame.
@@lorenzozapaton4031 They sold themselvs to Formlabs.
Formlabs successfully prevented a cheap open SLS-printer in competiton to their $30000+ printers, securing the high margin market from makers.
Hopefully the two got rich…
@@lorenzozapaton4031 Formlabs bought them.
Fantastic video breaking down exactly what they are doing. I have a unit on hand and should have a video up late next week on it. But this really is the perfect example of who exactly should be using Kickstarter as a platform to launch something new & innovative to the market
I disagree with you about this being a "perfect example" for Kickstarter. Kickstarter is intended to get a developed product into production. This product is still in testing and is inundated with unresolved problems. They're still having problems reliably feeding material into the build chamber. This product hasn't gotten out of alpha testing and is nowhere near ready for beta testing. Kickstarter funds are supposed to be used for getting a product into production. They are not supposed to be squandered on developing and testing something that one day might make it into production.
I think this isn't suitable for kickstarter given the product is dangerous and the mfg is downplaying the risks which can make people think it is safer than it really is. The fact they ship reviewers KN95 masks, basically all their sift bins broke, their fan filter is undersized and will clog rapidly over time, ... I would fully support them and even buy one if they actually said how dangerous the powder is even if it is "non-toxic".
@@riakataAgreed and well said, coming from someone who works with carbon black.
finaly something actually using kickstarter the right way
@@EDesigns_FLI hate to break it to you... But more than half Kickstarters don't even have a prototype. This is way further than the majority of Kickstarters
Finally someone else who agrees that this isn't for everyone. Love this video, love the SLS process, but not for everyone. I've been in weeks of trainings to get certifications with the HP MJF and various SLS processes. They also make no mention of the explosion proof vacuums and grounding of the machines properly.
You see similar issues in toner based copiers/Presses. Microfine particles and static are a bad combination.
Def way worse with metallic powders. Threat of fir or blast is probably pretty minimal if you follow the directions right and don't play let it snow with the powder.
They don't need explosion proof vaccums or grounding to be mentioned becuase their post processing stations and machines are explosion proof vacuums which are massively oversized and are extremely grounded and probably won't even turn on if they are not properly grounded (for industrial Selective Laser Sintering SLS). HP MJF (Multijet Fusion) uses liquid binders so you don't run into the powder hazard problems.
@@riakata not all powder can be contained. And so much of the HP builds aren't melted together. Having worked with HP for a couple years and am certified in the process it can still be a mess. No matter how much the powder recovery stations try.
Also: While nylon may be non toxic, anything with a fine enough particle size is considered carcinogenic!
While I hope they succed, a few further concerns you havent pointed out from someone who has developed a SLS printer a few years back
and is working with industrial ones on a daily basis.
- Energy consumption: I think people really underestimate how much energy/costs it takes to heat a sls printer just below the melting point.
The machines typically have to be preheated for 1-2 hours to have a uniform heat distribution and
even for a small machine like this that would probably mean 2 - 3 kw/h, without even starting the print.
So this means printing just 3-4 parts as the home user typically does is kinda expensive.
- Maintenance: These machines have to be thoroughly cleaned before every print.
Not only does the powder spill everywhere, the fumes from
the process settle down everywhere and have to be constantly removed.
Warping/shrinkage: There is a reason you most of the time only see rather small parts on those exhibitions.
For lager parts you have to compensate for shinkage in all dimensions and
futhermore the shinkage/deformation may vary on every point in the chamber as
the parts cool down diffrently in regards to their position.
Energy? The price of kWh is only about 5 cents. So in the big picture it´s nothing imo
I bet future consumer SLS will print, sift, reclaim, and blast automatically. Doesn't feel unachievable even with current tech.
Agreed, I think consumer SLS will have to be similar to formlabs system. Completely enclosed at every step.
I see that being achieved by taking some notes from laser printing (2D). Think about it; Laser printers electrically charge a cylinder with the desired image, then only the printing material (toner) is attracted to the print surface (paper)
Note: this description is simplified
In another video, they did an office tour one of their first prototypes it looked like they tried to do the sifting all in one unit.
just like these days my 3D printer can do the same, except i have to help it every time and prob spend as much time trying to keep the automatic functions working as i would take doing it manually
@@TheOfficialOriginalChad the problem then is it defeats one of the major benefits of SLS no? You’d be required to have supports.
I think a more useful comparison than a kilogram of filament vs. a kilogram of powder would be "What's the minimum I need to spend to get a kilogram of parts" because I think that's not nearly as close as they present here.
There's a minimum powder required to get started(fill the build chamber) and then the efficiency of the power usage. Assuming every print job you complete has a print density of greater than 30%, theoretically you get 1kg of parts from 1kg of powder forever. The reality is that about 3-8% of the powder goes to waste with each print job. That's through poor initial cleaning(more powder sandblasted off instead of being recycled) and spillage(there will always be some mess moving stuff around)
Judging by the size of the build volume, I'm going to guess around 3kg for a full build volume. The Fuse 1 and Fuse 1+ build chamber requires about 7Kg for a full build volume.
There's no point buying a printer if your usage for the entire lifetime of the printer is only a kilogram's worth of prints. Realistically, one fill of the chamber should be treated like part of the printer's purchase cost, and then it's only the powder consumed by a print (including waste) that counts as the per-part cost
$/benchy as a reference?
If I was selling parts, I'd absolutely spring for this printer. And yes, this project is very much in the spirit of the original kickstarter, they're taking a huge risk themselves and need money to reach the finish line, for people who believe in SLS and them, this is a wonderful project to bet on.
We bought a Formlabs fuse SLS machine at work. At first we were like OMG NO SUPPORTS NEEDED then you spend 1h cleaning the parts and understand that if it doesn't need support it's because the cake is really tought. Then you spend more time cleaning everything and if you don't have an antistatic vacuum cleaner be careful to not be jolted by static discharges.
But yes the parts are great!
Selling this machine at this price is a feat in itself, but selling it for "enthusiasts" is a bit optimistic. Once you dealt with the hassle of post-processing a SLS part, you do realise that many parts are best produced on a cheaper FDM machine that doesn't need a special vacuum cleaner and a sandblasting machine on top of that.
It will fit well for small companies, educational institutions, and some "heavy enthusiasts". Let's hope that it will force other actors to take a better look at their pricing, too!
I have the exact same thoughts, we also have a Fuse1 and it is a great machine but the hole SLS processing is very time and labour expensive. You also need the the blaster and compressor and vacuum system all in all not for consumer!
Your safety concerns are warranted, and I'm glad that you made such a strong point about it. SLS truly feels suitable only for those who have the appropriate space and equipment to manage volatile and aerosolizable materials
AAAAND is gone..
Lmao
They sold out to form-labs, that was a quick aquire to stop people from having a cost effect option for SLS.
@MattBruman wow, we need a boycott of form labs
This video did not age well, given the Formlabs acquisition and announcement Micron will no longer be developing this machine further.
Well, there were about 15 minutes between me finding out about this printer and finding out that it has been canceled and all information in the video has been rendered obsolete :/
I have no need or plans to get one of these, but I really wish Micronics well. I love the idea of a company like this shaking up the industry and redefining what the price point can be for SLS.
I love the statement about 3D printing that "complexity is free" its what the Production course in my Industrial Design Engineering study program taught me as well
It’s not entirely true though once you dig a little deeper. Prints can fail and the more complex they are the more likely they will be to fail. When just looking at one off items and not considering any failures then complexity is free. Also post processing is more complex for complex models and hence takes longer, again complexity is not free. SLS parts needing media blasted is a good example of this, the more complex the model the harder it will be to post process, especially if you have print in place mechanisms that you need to find a way to get the powder out of.
Looking at other forms of 3D printing complexity is also not free when you have to add supports to support your complex models, especially when you get that complex that you have to use dissolvable supports.
So complexity being free is not true, it can cost more in terms of time or money, it is however much cheaper than other manufacturing processes which may not even be able to produce your part.
A more truthful statement is "the costs of CNC machining don't apply to 3D printing; the costs of 3D printing do".
What a very thorough set of questions you managed to ask! I am also impressed with the knowledge and openness of Luke when it comes to the functionality and features of these printers. I do not think this is the consumer level device yet but it is an important step into achieving something we can all own.
Using Unreal Engine and a physics simulator as a slicer is pretty creative.
Also kinda funny we can just order pure microplastics.
They deserve to do well. That guy knows his product and his honesty is refreshing in this day and age.
No, they don't. They're hypocrites who went against everything they stood for, all for a dollar.
Fantastic video with great points and a grounded approach!
This video was a great explanation of SLS, I learned a lot about the process and this cool printer. I think you asked great questions and I can't wait to see this method of printing become more accessible like FDM printing has.
Love the work these guys have done to kick down the barrier to SLS, hope they succeed and it ushers in further evolution in the SLS space. Reminds me somewhat of the story of resin 3D printing being blown open by the use of simple LCD panels and a UV lamp. Clearly as far as the hobby market goes it's only for the relatively well-heeled although there are plenty of people out there happy to drop $3k to $5k on a Prusa XL so it's not as if no-one can afford it.
Don't check the latest news from these guys unless you want to be disappointed
The idea of home SLS printing is really attractive, but all the post processing and material handling is such a huge issue. It feels like this sort of thing is really much more suited for people running a business or maybe in a maker space where the whole build volume can be used and maybe a hand full of people run it and do the post processing in a specific room. I would also be curious about bioplastics and biodegradable materials for something like this to cut down on the microplastics issues for home use.
Using biodegradable materials would certainly help with the pollution problems, however one of the nice things about SLS is the increased strength of the parts, and I don't know of too many biodegradable plastics with high tensile strength.
Honestly it doesn't seem that much crazier than resin. And tons of home users use it now.
@@ZeeLobby The post processing area for resin is much smaller. The whole media blaster cabinet needed for SLS is going to take up a lot of space. There may be other ways of accomplishing that step in finishing, such as a tumbler or something like that. But it is an extra step. As far as material handling, that is a bit of a pick your poison, but at least resin won't spread from a slight breeze.
@@mintzbuck depends on the size of prints. A desktop booth that can fit anything the micron produces honestly isn't that large. Takes up the same amount of space as a separate wash and cure station. I only say this cause I already own one and resin printers.
It's literally a laser printer except the toner cartridge is open to the air and you have to dig through it. If you've ever messed with laser toner you'll understand. I can't imagine, haha. It's cool technology but the *main* reason I would want SLS is for printing metal. Maybe some day before I die.
Oh I think metal sls printing is their main goal and aspiration
@@LeafBoye have they ever said this?
I know your final question was meant as a joke, but it could theoretically be possible to print in tin with this. Has a 236 celcius melting point, and a much sharper melting point than nylon. Also has better thermal conductivity so will cool faster after the laser has passed, but might be too runny and maybe too high surface tension when molten
Tin vapor is extremely toxic. Ask a welder about proper precautions when welding galvanized (tin coated) steel.
just stumbled upon this machine on accident and now a vid from you... the day can't get better!
Packing the build volume is actually rather complex if you're looking for dimensional accuracy. Parts too close together can cause "creep" of the heat and make the melted areas creep towards each other. For real precision you also want the laser scan time per layer to be rather uniform, which helps maintain uniform temperature deformation.
Lastly, for very fine details you still need to take into account the wavelength of the laser. Prime example is small holes, where even a single pass may cause enough creep to close the hole.
That was another big innovation that Stefan didn't go into detail: the Micronics software uses common game engine software to take your objects, give them a minimal 3d buffer, and stack them into the print volume efficiently and quickly. You could pack it better manually but developing the UI software and performing the packing at peak efficiency would take them many months longer and ends up even more proprietary.
@ed_halley at 15:55 he talks about it
@@ed_halleyyou totally missed the point of what the comentator wanted to say. The game engine is just looking for collision nothing more
@@TaconiteableYup. A quick and dirty method would be to just add an invisible “force field” or non-printing volume around the outer surface of the parts, so everything has a minimum distance between everything, so that heat soak is minimised. You could algorithmically determine this distance based on time spent printing each layer and the heat conduction rate, and the power used in each layer and dynamically vary this boundary layer thickness… but it’s probably unnecessary, and a fixed distance would be fine, if slightly less efficient
@@mduckernz thats how other sls slicers do it today - with a fixer bounding box
Thank you for another fantastic video! This video gets into more of the important details than any other video on this printer.
I'd love to have one, but I think it's definitely not for everyone due to safety and mess issues as you mentioned. The same as any machine using powder based printing.
Hopefully it will be a hit, and over the next couple versions they will develop more safety related additions. But I think it will always be a bit risky and messy just because of all that powder. It's definitely not for the average person.
*Will you continue to build the Micron?*
While our mission to bring industrial-quality SLS to a much wider audience remains unchanged, we will not be continuing to work on Micron and will instead be integrating our ideas and research into Formlabs’ development roadmap.
This is really interesting. Thanks.
I have no clue about 3D printing but youtube keeps suggesting it to me and its so interesting. It's unaffordable for me, but I love watching things getting made just like that!
I really hope they have a organization method for parts that lays them as flat as possible, therefore allowing the bed to be as thin as possible and use less powder, opposed to a talk tower and more leftover powder….. I like it though!!!!
This SLS looks really cool. I really hope it succeeds. You will definitely want to make sure you wear PPE when using it.
We have been using and researching SLS at work for around 20 years, and to be honest, I don't see it as a viable hobby technology due to mess, material cost, complexity, cleaning post process, and energy requirements, but this looks great for a small business use. I wish them all the best
Yeah it seems SLS won’t be ready for hobby use anytime soon. For it to be ready for home use it would need to be a fully enclosed system. You give it your model to print and it spits out a finished and post processed part.
What do you think of their safety advice about using the printer?
They should make a desktop tumbler with built in filter and conduit to attach a vacuum for a less messy initial removal of unsintered material which collects and can easily be poured back into the machine for reuse then a media blaster that uses the same nylon powder to blast any remaining nylon powder off the print, then that powder can be reused as it has not been contaminated with blasting media. If the main concern with reusing "used" powder is the larger lumps ruining the surface quality and interfering with structural integrity, perhaps "used" powder could be milled back to a powder via a mechanical grinder?
That glass cantilever screen needs to have plastic laminated to it so when it pops it doesn’t ruin your powder or cause injury . I worked with pinball machines and when pulling out the glass it had to be supported, if you didn’t the cantilever would stress tempered glass to much and you would get an explosion. I saw 3 pinballs ruined from careless service guys or arcade staff when cleaning the glass and moving a jammed ball.
What I always miss in the reviews of this machine, is the safety aspect (which you luckily address). Super fine powder requires a lot of preparation, I would even only want to use it in a fume-hood or something. Or very isolated in a dedicated, super ventilated space. Which makes it not really a "home" printer.
The 3D Printing content on youtube draws FAR too many 'safety' concerns. Nylon is literally used in just about every implantable medical device, because it is just about as inert as a material can be. Nearly anything you could come into contact with, in any fabrication environment, is more harmful. Breathing tons of dust particles is bad no matter what they are made from, so use a p100 or N95 mask while handling the powder and you are protected.
They look like they do dust control well in addition. You need to media blast the objects, and chances are if you have a media blaster, you know to not breathe in all the aerosolized blast media that is far worse than nylon. If not, there is no fixing stupid.
Either way, do your thing, let any dust settle, and keep a clean workspace. The human body is insanely resilient to small exposures to tons of things that are harmful in huge doses. In nearly every case, we find that exposures at reasonable levels have no measurable effect on health or longevity. This is true for everything from VOCs and fine particulates, to ionizing radiation. Until you exceed a reasonable exposure limit, we have identified zero harms. For substances where this is less true (where the acceptable limits are very low) like asbestos, heavy metals, etc., we basically have banned any application where meaningful exposure is even possible.
The excess 'safety' concern in 3D printing UA-cam content has annoyed me for a while. The Q1 pro reviews that mentioned that the chamber heater could be dangerous if you stuck a conductor through the heater shield while the printer was in operation were too much. This is true. I can also think of about 1000 other ways you could get hurt doing equally stupid things with consumer equipment.
3D printers are tools and probably the tools most tolerant of user stupidity. But yet the UA-cam 3D printing channels act like anything that isn't 100% tolerant of user stupidity is a huge safety concern. It is like folks complaining about the electric shock hazard of US plugs. It exists, sure, and yet if you eliminated it completely, you wouldn't have a noticeable effect on US all-cause mortality. Safety has to be a likelihood vs danger vs benefit analysis. Folks who can't do that analysis, should learn how to or stay away from anything more dangerous than baby toys. We all drive for heaven's sake.
I wouldn't ever use an SLS machine in the same house my kids grow up in. Fine powders are very dangerous. Micro plastics are an emerging issue as well.
@@JOEDHIGGINS Sure, I agree, but glossing over it or not mentioning at all is at the other end of the spectrum in my opinion. If you use this machine without any protection or cleanup (which people are going to do, especially if not mentioned) it's not going to be pleasant on your lungs, as inert as it might be. Just like open laser systems people have no clue about, it's worth at least having a caution. I do agree that safety is very complex and you need to know about before going wild about it for sure. People are driving indeed, that doesn't mean much in other situations and we're not particular great in that either.
@@WheatMillington I take form that that you check your tire pressure and tread wear remaining weekly at minimum, inspect your seatbelts for wear and fraying regularly?
You could always do all the work in your garage. I grew up using all manner of woodworking tools (table saws, lathes, band saws, etc.) No lasting harm and a lot of good came from it. Definitely some risk, but I am better for it. How many parents let their children be basically lethargic or sit around on devices all day every day. Far more harmful than potential exposure to an appropriately managed risk.
My shop now has all the same woodworking tools, plus welding, machining, fabrication, blacksmithing and CNC. Should I make sure to keep my children from any of these definitely deadly and dangerous tools? Or just maybe teach them to use them properly. And manage risk.
@@VincentGroenewold Sure. Be cautious and manage risk, but if you spend thousands on an industrial CNC tool and don't read, do any research, or look at the warning label on the side of the container of raw material, I have essentially no sympathy for the outcomes you get.
Great video. I am excited to see this technology coming down in price. I personally don't have a use for this type of machine but it is still really cool to see none the less and I hope it is successful.
Much better angle to take than some other channels, great video
It looks like he never got his hands on the printer.. hes basically just doing an interview rather than a product demonstration.
@@shivaargula4735 It probably wouldn't survive international shipping in its current state.
@@shivaargula4735 i still find it more entertaining and informative than flaming a beta preprod unit for 30 minutes
Great interview 👍
I remember when FDM 3d printers were thousands of dollars. Now I can pick up an ender 3 for $200, or a better FDM printer for two or three times that. Maybe when I'm old I'll be able to buy an SLS printer cheap.
I'm hopeful too. We've seen crazier leaps in tech. I think it's possible
I saw the ender 3 on a sale for a third less too!
Looking forward to your material tests in the future, especially the carbon fiber and glass infused ones.
no one mentioned the 1 downside of SLS i can think of, which is you cannot print an air tight hollow item, as the powder would be sealed inside it.
Interesting thought but I think most people printing at this level already know of that limitation because that's not unique to just SLS, liquid resin printing already has the same issue (although it would be way more impactful on SLS depending on shape but it's the same issue still)
Same problem with sla too
@@chomp7927 Isn't the problem less severe for liquid resin printing because the material should flow out during the process?
@@LanceThumping If you don't use drain holes, I'd argue it's much worse for SLA because the trapped resin is likely to burst out from the trapped volume, splattering resin in places where it probably doesn't belong. As little as you might want either SLS powder or SLA resin on/in you, I suspect that enclosed volumes of powder are less dangerous than enclosed volumes of resin.
If you use drain holes with resin, you either have to put them in an unimportant location or weld plugs into the holes. I'd assume the same would be true for SLS, though plugging the drain holes would be more challenging.
@@LanceThumpingyou can do drain holes with SLS too
well well well… how the turntables
Everyone should watch this video and also the Stranger Parts video on this machine before backing the Kickstarter campaign.
I think they are where Sinterit was 10 years ago. I would stick to proven brands and wait out on this for a a couple of years at least until all reliability issues have been worked out.
I just realized the Colorado PCB assembly booth next to micronics. That’s so kind since they helped William Osman (organizer of open sauce) finish his pcbs in time for the mrbeast squid game
Hope they address the hazard of the combustible dust. Tpu especially. Lofted in air it can kick off with static spark. Need proper grounding. And for more advanced materials inerting the chamber is necessary
Their high speed fan filter unit thing is super dangerous on the combustible dust front one mistake and you could have the cake in the exhaust airstream and loft the entire chamber worth of dust into the air where it very easily could find an ignition source. Normally the post processing is done with vaccum filtration systems where the exhaust is dispersed so that there is no risk of that happenning. None of their post processing equipment looks even remotely ESD/anti-static either so the powder is just going to go all over the place.
Watching SLS printer videos always makes me sneeze for some reason LOL
I've gotten a lot of SLS parts made professionally for work. IMO they LOOK more like production parts but resin is more accurate for functional parts. Long, high aspect ratio holes and shafts (>20:1) tend to unavoidably warp and be inaccurate with SLS. Small features (
Isn't resin supposed to be not accurate for functional parts?
im preety sure that is not a problem of sls but from your part maker. For example der8auer has used sls to make a custom water system for a laptop with extremly small fins etc.
Nice detailed comment. Bravo.
Working for a company that uses SLS for aerospace it sounds like more of a skill issue from whoever you're buying from
@@oni2inkwhere do you have that nonsense from? Resin is the most accurate consumer printing tech, period.
It would be advised to upgrade the laser to 10-15W one to reduce the general temperatur of the unused powder .
It helps reusability and the cleaning of the parts.
That booth guy really knows his stuff!
The best review of this printer. Great questions and answers. Definitely not for the "maker dudes"!
One accidental advantage of FDM is you get your polymer chains lined up as the model is built. Obviously not isotropic, yet I bet it's stronger along the extrusion paths than something fused from a fine powder. Would be nice to see a bench test tho, maybe I'm wrong.
For now I'm quite happy with how my tactically positioned parts work together to make really resilient mechanisms, pretty close to what you would expect with injection molding. Metal SLS sounds more sensible, there you don't rely on larger molecular structures, as long as the powder fuses properly, it can be as good or even better than cast parts.
I do wonder if it would be possible to create filament from this powder. If not directly then maybe using SLS to print pellets like are currently used to make filament. Of course this wouldn’t be practical but it would be a way to test the strength of the material when it is printed using SLS and FDM.
As you say FDM can be very strong if the parts are designed for FDM printing with the best possible print orientation.
these guys sounds like they have all the details in the design pretty well worked out
Bro really just invented an asbestos leaf blower machine….
Well they have glass and carbon fill which are already known lung cancer causing agents thrown into an ultrafine nylon powder that will get everwhere even if you have the proper equipment.
I've seen videos on UA-cam of diode laser cutters marking and cutting transparent materials just fine. What the owners do is they place a black piece of card stock underneath the material that is being cut or marked. This also means the card stock has a cool pattern etched into it that can be framed as a secondary art product.
I really hope they have massive success with this, not because I backed it, but because I'm waiting for the gen 3 or even gen 4 machine, when the kinks have been worked out. I have serious doubts about the safety of this machine in the hands of "typical" end users. An N95 mask really isn't enough. This machine needs to be limited to enclosed spaces away from living spaces, because there IS going to be dust getting everywhere, and despite nylon being non-toxic, the fine particulate itself poses a physical risk to your lungs.
Hopefully with future iterations this can be better addressed.
I also hope that they have done their research on manufacturing. There is no doubt that in order to get the machines manufactured to sell at this price point, they will be using a Chinese factory, and manufacturing in China comes with a lot of caveats. Most factories over there will make undocumented changes to your parts if you don't stand over them micromanaging everything, and this can have pretty serious results. It really is necessary to have someone in the factory working directly for you, not the factory ensuring that quality is maintained and there are no changes being made to your specification.
You're very good at asking the right questions, great video!
This is very cool! I support this. I am for all expensive industrial machines to reach the cheap home level.
I've always wanted to know more about SLS. AWESOME!
Really cool for a dedicated shop 👌 I kind of wish the build volume was smaller though so it could use less power and also lower the price, especially in early development
I don’t know if making it smaller would lower the price all that much, all the main components would need to remain the same, laser, auger, etc. If you made it smaller than likely all you could save would be in using a smaller heater and a smaller recoater (which is just a rubber blade). All the expensive parts would stay the same.
So much respect for Stephan for admitting that even FDM printing can be hazardous for your health. So many creators in this space completely ignore the health risks associated with FDM printers and so many in the community are in denial because of this.
but prusament pla smells so good when printing.. :(
@@riverjane1223it smells so good that sometimes I eat a couple of supports
The health risks of FDM are relatively minor as long as you stick to the most common materials, like PLA. If you need to print any chemically nastier filaments like ABS, nylon, PC, PVDF, etc. then you really need to take safety precautions, like making sure your room is well ventilated and ideally the printer is filtered.
The morph transition on the cuts is really unsettling in a way I can't describe hhgh
Hella cool tech tho
What about the time needed to print? One of the biggest downsides of standard FDM printing is the time taken. If you need to completely fill the SLS print volume in order to be economical, does that mean it takes multiple days to finish the print? Or is it a few hours?
This is really awesome definitely not in my budget but really awesome none the less
I would love this tech to become main stream. The use case I have for it would be perfect for parts.
I get that it might be a cheaper alternative, but "affordable" is not the first word I would use to describe a 3D printer
The fine detail quality depends more on x/y resolution not the spot size itself. The spot size only limits the size of the most thin walls and parts. So fine details should still be possible like on resin printers or like "fuzzy skin" on FDM-prints with 0.4mm nozzle can produce much smaller details - in theory.
It depends heavily on both spot size and X/Y resolution depending on what you are printing. When printing large parts spot size doesn’t matter much but when printing thin or detailed parts spot size matters a lot.
Just look at the difference between 0.2 mm nozzle FDM prints and resin prints, the FDM print will not look as good despite possibly having the same X/Y resolution.
A 0.25 mm spot size means that any outside sharp edge or corner will have a 0.25 mm fillet applied to it.
@@conorstewart2214 as I said - the spot size limits the size of parts, but not the fine details (of larger objects above 3x spotsize, as bigger as no matter)
Thanks Stephan, this is the best perspective. Two guys build a great machine like this just to get horrible reviews due to shifting in shipping.
Could you in theory be able to grind down old or failed parts into powder that you can remix into the chamber to reuse?
I feel your disclaimer was meant for me. I am in the lazy group. Have cuts, burns and am trying to match Elctro boom on taking electric shocks. With this one I would probably have powder in my ears.
I'm glad Jared Dunn found a cool new place to work after the Hooli situation
I don’t think anybody was going to drop $4k on this without understanding that SLS isn’t something to do in your bedroom anyway. I backed it myself
I think there are plenty of people who use resin printers improperly and spend far more than 4k without understanding the risks. SLS printers can cause long term toxic powder buildup it could literally spread itself around a building slowly giving people around lung cancer in the long run. The mfg could be much more clear that to fit the budget all safety items are the user's responsiblity and provide a clear list of required items for any standard procedure including spill handling.
SLS metal printing is a whole different beast, besides the cost it's also very dangerous ;)
So as a Fuse1 owner, that powder cleaning setup is absolutely not going to be sufficient. ;-) Even with Formlabs' Sift cleaning station (with a giant filter and suction system) powder *still* sneaks out everywhere just at every step once it's out of the printer... Doing that kind of cleaning in an open container as shown will be a HUGE mess after a couple prints. (Especially since you need to brush the partially sintered powder somewhat aggressively-- it doesn't just fall away loose like with MultiJet Fusion or EOS powders.) I'm also a little skeptical of the claims for supporting PA+CF powder as I believe that would really require an inert atmosphere in the machine. I can see a lot of print problems in their sample parts (possibly just from powder that was reused too many times or with too low of refresh rate), but for an entire printer that costs about as much as just the build chamber for the Fuse1... Might be worth a shot!
I love how an Odogaron from Monster Hunter managed to make its way into the sample prints.
I want numbers for strength. Would love to see notched Izod and tensile tests with their prints.
At work we have a clean room for the SLS printers where you have to wear similar clothing that they wear for automotive spray painting with a respirator. TBH I think it is a "bit" overkill, but better safe than sorry
It's really ingenius in many ways, even if there are some hiccups. The slicer especially.
Just needs some more thought to post processing, such as recycling used nylon powder. Post processing SLS prints is a major hassle in my experience. At least without something like you get with the Formlabs Fuse 1 setup (downdraft table, vacuum, air blaster, etc).
I'm going to be following their progress with great interest, but at a rough guess, I'd say the tech needs about another decade of iteration and development on this scale before it's ready to take off like FDM printing. That's not a bad thing by any means, and these guys look to be doing great work. I just think SLS needs some time to mature and develop down the consumer friendly route before it stands a chance of breaking into the market.
I like the idea of SLS printer, but the clean up is main reservation I have. My designs would have multiple delicate pieces, that could be a pain to clean.
How is the energy consumption and heat retention? other sls printers seem to have thicker walls?
That morph-cut at 2:42 though...
Never occurred to me that you could use Unreal Engine to make a slicer
Yes, that fascinated me too. I wonder what else Unreal can do.
How do you print an empty but enclosed sphere or cube, (anything) without trapping the raw powder inside?
This video aged like a fine glass of milk
I'd like to know what the strength of the nylon parts are compared to FDM printed PLA. I assume that there would be a reasonable difference in strength.
Well, still too expensive for me but I'm looking forward to a future where I can. Great tech!
Fair points on the safety concerns of the process here. Personally, I would build a dedicated fume hood for this and do everything in there because let's face it, if you're laying out 5 grand and the space for a machine, you can fab a fume hood for it all to live in. Safety aside, it would also contain the mess.
You'd need more than a fume hood you'd also need an explosion resistant vaccum and ideally a dust collection system hooked upto a downdraft table where you can clean off parts and recovery the loose powder without any risk of it spreading. I highly doubt all the backers on kickstarter understand you need proper ventilation, cleaning equipment, PPE, etc... especially when the Micronics keeps saying it is super safe. If it was super safe you wouldn't need a mask, gloves, ... its literally a jug of billions of microplastics if you inhaled that bottle even a small fraction you will absolutely destroy your lungs permenantly.
@@riakata any sources to back your claims? + Tobacco is freely (restrictions may apply) available and widely used to _absolutely destroy your lungs permenantly_ :/
I definitely don't think SLS can have as far a reach as FDM printing for the health reasons you mentioned, but having it be more financially accessible would definitely help it be utilized by those that might not have been able to otherwise
Now I kinda want to rip my glowforge apart and use the parts to make an SLS printer
Our company also has nearly 30 different models of 3D printers, 3D printing is really an opportunity to achieve the impossible, and we have achieved a lot of interesting operations with it.
Curious why the open source "SLS for all" project hasn't got similar hype. It seems more dialed and at a similar price point
Pretty amazing technology...
The UE5 physics simulation packing is a fantastic idea. But outside that, as I said on Joel's video, this is just not something for consumers unless it can be done entirely self contained. It needs to be a vending machine, not a sand box.
Yes, this is what Kickstarter was made for!
18:52 And don't forget that over that time frame the cost of the Formlabs Fuse1 almost doubled from the early announcement in 2017 to the effective release of the v1 in 2021, and that since then the Fuse1+ 30W (an updated, more powerful version) in 2022 has almost doubled its price again! So that what was originally planned as a $9,999 SLS 3D printer came out at a $18,499 one IRL, and today the actual printer costs $27,499 😵💫
Call that democratization of SLS technology...
Go Micronics!
Don't forget, you're gonna want a Fuse Sift as well! +8K
The Fuse Sift is 10K BTW
And when you have the Sift you want the Fuse Blast for post-processing: +11K ahah
Not to mention the mandatory subscription to Formlabs Service plan ($4500/year)!
@@fluxcapacitor I guess it's gone up like everything else. The service plan is not mandatory, but I would recommend it for the first year. A formlabs rep comes out to perform the annual service, which is really helpful to learn more about maintaining the printer. You also get much better technical support.
We don't use the Fuse Blast. After speaking with our rep, it didn't make sense for us with our larger scale production.
@@93Martin Admittedly. You don't post-process the parts produced by sandblasting them at all, or you are using a different system than the Fuse Blast?
You don't mention power: I would imagine all that heat requirement means a much higher power consumption versus FDM. It's amazing to have another technology for 3D printing, but this seems a niche method better suited for production than prototyping.