I remember I was amaze by how detail everything is. the texture on the cloth fabric, plastic surface, dust, scratch surface. it was worth the wait to see this animation. I wonder how the future animation movie will looks like. what a time to be alive....
Jun your comment makes no sense. I’m speaking on a level of skill, technique, and ingenuity that was the fur in Monsters Inc. As the video creator mentioned it had yet to be done. Comparing a movie 18 years in the future has no relevance to my statement.
Etan Plan He is saying its crazy how much further CG animation has come even from how good Sully looks as well. Why you so upset? His comment is indeed relevant
@@yigoh8437 trust me a lot of people do especially clients they say "why do you charge so high? it's just easy." then artists be like, "why don't you do it yourself if it's easy?"
Andrew Purcell wonder if these animation studios will master them which those are DreamWorks , illumination entertainment, blue sky studios and Sony pictures animation
u can be a screenwriter so study story and writing, or can be a vis dev artist, or character designer, background and props, or story board artist!! u still have hope :D
Greenleaf gaming 043009 y’all need to stop harassing me about the new season 😭 it’s not my fault just like it’s not nobody fault but the writers for GoT s7-8 being ass I’m just an actor man 😭😞
It's almost like growing up with someone else. Let's say your twin. You don't notice how much they change until you look back at what they used to look like.
@@user-ij7um1ev9w I mean people typically associate animation being for kids, when they can be just as good as some of the greatest movies of all time e.g. the Incredibles
@@SSC0002 That's the old generation. Literally a lot of cartoons that older "adult" people can watch. Tons of "adult"people watch anime animated films and "kids" movies like superhero films. Especially there's a huge anime following among older people.
As visually stunning as it is the movie should of never have been made, TS3 was the ending of the series for alot of people and 4 just came and screwed it up
Man we all grew up with toy story back toy story looked really nice. But now that i look back at it, it wasnt as good as i remembered. The scary part is, that itll keep on improving.
I just watched it again in honor of the new one coming out. I did notice some issues but overall it still looks pretty good! The biggest issue with it is the human designs. Everything else still looks pretty good for the first fully CGI film.
Yep, it is. There are even some clipping errors on some models and some textures that are completely pixelated and low res. It’s ok tho. It was amazingly done with the tech they had at the time.
@@ShadowLimited310 I know but I want to bring hand drawn animation back to the mainstream and 2d animation software is not good enough for me (flash animation for example)
They even made those little cracks on Bo Peep's fringle, you know the one that appear on porcelain after years. Those tiny details really make it feel that the toon is very real...
i'd love to see pixar "remake" toy story 1 using their new tech, just so we can really see how much of a difference it made beyond just comparing the first movie with the last one
@yasahiro hotaru so remastering a game is stupid too? the reason i said they should remaster 1 is because you can't properly compare the two because they are inherently two different movies, but if you remade 1, then you could have side to side comparisons of the same scenes, aswell as the fact that they could add new stuff if they wanted to since the tech has evolved so much. sometimes you can remaster something simply because you have better tech than when you first made the product, especially considering its been over 20 years now, so having a fully accurate remaster would be really interesting to compare it to. and why do you get to say if its a waste of time and effort? if the staff at Pixar want to remake it using their new tech, then they should be able to, you don't even know if it even would be a waste considering it doesn't even exist, nevermind the fact that you aren't a staff there and that i'm just stating that i'd wish they did, its not as if i'm the one in control and can force them to do it, and i honestly don't expect anything like that for several years yet, if it even happens at all
@hotarou yasahiro you realise how remaking movies appeals to adults with nostalgia and kids who like Toy Story? And by appealing to both of them, it makes money, which doesn't make it a waste of time as it paid. So weeb, *your points are stupid.*
Lmao I love it when I read replies on a comment and people are having arguments and one person gets verbally destroyed so much they delete their comment
@@bloodprince9779 (1 month later but okay - sry for bad english) Its not the same remaking a movie than remaking a videogame. For example, Resident Evil 2 Remake took the original and improved its graphics AND mechanics, adapting the controls to make it easier to play in this generation. Not is the case with a movie, where you don't have an 'old' type of gameplay ( in this case the tank controls in the original RE 2) that makes the experience harder to enjoy. if you go to see Toy Story 1, it's still perfectly enjoyable, and remaking it would not only make the original "obsolete", but also wouldn't be more than a simple cashgrab like the remake of The Lion King. Toy Story 4 is perfectly valid for comparing how much animation has improved between these years.
Bloodprince original ones are always the best no matter how bad they were. Theyre awesome because they’re nostalgic, they remind us of our childhood, remaking it is just stupid while they can make new better ones. That’s the thing about animation industry, they move foward and get better each time, they dont go back to redo something. If I use that logic of yours, should I go to the museum and ask them to replace the antics with something better of this century? Theyre precious because they’re proof of how things have evolved to this stage, how they got better and it needs to be the one and only not to be faded away by some remake uh idk maybe because it’s called a CLASSIC?
To be honest, Toy Story 4 is by far the most realistic animated films (until they make another realistic animation)! I literally thought half the movie was real life!
Shit i just got done watching toy Story 1 and yeah the whole movie has a old feeling to the CGI it looks good still they did a very good job but the technology has obviously gotten better and yeah the dog looks pretty bad lol
The would have codes and programs set up now so they don't have to do everything from scratch. They were creating programs with every movie and that's why it took so long.
@@echonuim it's definitely hard. That's why it costs hundreds of millions of dollars to create. A lot of grunt work goes into the details, it's possible that it takes millions of man hours.
I love how as technology got better, they chose to put the same amount of work into making a better product, instead of doing it faster to produce the same old thing.
PSA: Animators are responsible for the character performance only. If you want to refer to the other artists at Pixar (the ones creating realistic fur, water, lighting, etc) you can use the term VFX artist, or TD (technical director).
im just amazed at how solid their earlier movies are, they knew their limitations and created a limited but solid and consistent look. sometimes its not about having state of the art tech but in knowing how to apply what you've got on a vision of suitable scale, they still look a hundred times better than lumination studios
Yeah, it's a great movie. Though I remember it looking on the level of Toy Story 2, but that was just my memory seeing things as better because there wasn't much to compare it to.
As a 3d animator, i think it was because the software they had wasn't as powerful at the time, having low quality textures was very common but it was still iconic due to how impressive the quality of animation was back in the 90's, at the time, 3d animated movies were still unorthodox
I think this video underestimates the rain scene. The cat was amazing of course -- but when the movie starts, the rain drops looks so real that it was mind-blowing.
exactly. at first i thought those scenes are real until i deeply look at the house then realised that's animated. i just amazed by that. also the chandelier light scene in the antique shop. i just love it.
And imagine that there were 11 and 9 years in between Toy Story 2 and 3 and 3 and 4. If Toy Story 5 were to happen and they took that lonh, I’ll be almost 40 y/o 🙀
@@ToraydoBull Actually Pixar movies don't really take that long to make, according to Tom Hanks it takes 4 and a half years to make one movie, the reason why they take so long to come out is because they're working on other movies at the same time and they have to get those out before Toy Story.
I guess it wasn't as big of a challenge. He didn't talk about Violet's long hair in the Incredibles, but I'd bet that was a bigger challenge back then than Merida's curly hair
It’s _definitely_ not underrated. I don’t know where you heard that, but it was one of the most popular movies of the year. Also because of the scenery and animation.
Tomato Brian Coco was NOT underrated. It was critically and commercially acclaimed for its art style and animation, and is considered one of the most respected animated films of all time.
I guess it may be due to where I'm from, but in my country, Coco was truly underrated. So I just wanted to highlight that it's just my opinion and y'all have valid points as well.
Architectural surfaces and furniture were vastly improved. The way Evelyn and other characters moved, sat, and stood was more life-like than previous films as well. The biggest achievement was probably the lighting though.
Pixar POURS so much love into their projects. The physics research, water, rain, people animated, and clumping hair, is all so important to how their movies stand out from other animation studios. I loved all the toy stories, Incredibles, finding Nemo, and more... It's insane how much they love their job.
Obviously Pixar pushes graphics faster than videogames, they are not only not being constantly put back by consoles limits, but they have hours to render every single frame, when a game has to render several frames per second. Still, they've been pulling pretty impressive effects. Even when a good dinosaur is a so-so movie, it pushed photo realism to another level for pixar
I have a new found respect for animators. It was my dream to be one someday but I realized how patient I would have to be make these. Tim Allen and Tom Hanks said it takes 4 or sometimes 8 years just to make their movies and it makes sense see as how they manage to get to much detail in each character.
I never forgot being 7 years old and seeing Toy Story 1 for the first time, I had spent my childhood watching 2D Animation so my mind was blown, I really thought the Animation was magic. People today most likely think that animation sucks but back in the 90s it was a breathtaking and groundbreaking.
Wrong, I personally know one of the animators and he was a former police officer at Fort Worth Texas and now he’s one at Pixar and has worked on Toy Story 4 and the Incredibles 2 also Coco. So no you just need experience and effort
Animators don't have to be good at everything- they don't do everything. They make things move, and that's it. Other departments handle everything else.
Two things 1. The scene with the fluffy toys attacking the grandma was so unexpected it made me laugh until I couldnt breath 2. The ending felt a tad rushed but was an ok ending in my opinion
Forky being a spork reminded me of the funny moment in Wall-e where he finds a spork and is trying to decide to put it with the forks or spoons and ends up putting it in the middle.
That cat is surreal and Bo Peep's new look is hella 🔥 But the best thing about the movie is the ending. As a 90's kid, I never thought I developed a deep connection in the Toy Story franchise. The parting scene was so emotional..
Animators : Spends more than 30 hours over just one frame Us: Misses 10 SECONDS of the movie, just to ask for more pop corns Meanwhile animators : 👁️, 👁️ / 👄
@@Samirxkhan Holograms already look real. I've been to Springfield and in a museum, they had a dude in some theater-type place and he was giving an entire speech on Abraham Lincoln. He was vivid and lively, then only at the end for him to admit he was actually a deceased soldier and he slowly faded away since he is a hologram. Never saw it coming.
@@xxxod I'm talking about real time holograms. Not rendered holograms. Rendered holograms have been around decades. We've only just started making movies using real time rendering with programs like Unreal Engine and it looks pretty good. But real time holograms look really basic. Check out Hololens. And I'm not talking about things you have to go to a museum for. Maybe in 10 years time we'll have prescription glasses that project Holograms. Almost like a miniature version of the Hololens.
Nobody: Literally nobody: Pixar: For 'Finding Nemo's' sequel we'll put an octopus that we definitely don't know how to animate and it'll take 2 years to complete 1 scene
Theory: They’re just really testing their new innovations of CGI with a good portion of their movies. Some of their movies exist just to fully master an innovation such as fur, water, etc.
![Why The Screenslaver is Pixar's Stupidest Villain [Incredibles 2]](/img/n.gif)
What behind-the-scenes element do you want to learn more about? Let us know in the comments below!
NoaBoa TV oof
everything
The jungle book
The New CGI Version of The Lion King,it Looks so Realistic(at Least in The Trailers),I’d Love to Know How They Pull it Off
Cars 3
Being a child is beautiful, you will never see the flaws.
Yes indeed my friend
That is the first ever fully 3d animated movie.
What are you expecting????
@@kunalnature a kid doesn't understand the it's the first full length animation, chill dude
yea
@@wamviee2275 even for adults it was pretty real bc tgere wasn’t anything like that before
The animation is insane. The cat. Each individual hair on forkys arms. And the wire in the middle of the fur. Insane
gecko Productions ikr!
I remember I was amaze by how detail everything is. the texture on the cloth fabric, plastic surface, dust, scratch surface. it was worth the wait to see this animation. I wonder how the future animation movie will looks like. what a time to be alive....
The wood texture of forks feet! The glitter glue around his eyes.
I swear I thought that cat was real for a second when I first saw it. It's unreal how good they are.
HAVE YA SEEN THE RAIN?!?
That cat though, it seriously looks SO real ❤️❤️
Kitarinki maybe it is
I thought they took a real cat and added it into the shot!
Wolfie Grey ikr!
I know I confused I thought the cat was real
Kitarinki ikr
That legit looks like a real cat
Yeah
.-.
At first I thought it WAS a real cat I was like “hUh?”
It looks more realistic than a real cat
@@cartoon-ly7lg no
Wow! Sometimes I forget how much work goes into making movies
How do you forget that?
IKR
@@cebada1272 I THOUGHT I WAS THE ONLY ONE WHO THOUGHT THIS
Erin Hall ikr now I feel bad when everyone demands a second movie or more lol
It's awesome! They make it look so easy
I like how every Pixar animation is a masterpiece. They don't make animations, they make memories. Thank you Pixar ...
True
Muji Huz Cars 2, the good dinosaur, and brave
The original cars was a lot better
arinios I think he was pointing out the ones that were bad. First Cars is definitely better.
@@hi-cz8zd I don't think Brave was as bad as the other two there
Even today Sully looks amazing from Monsters INC. What a technical achievement.
Crazy how technical wise, Pikachu from Detective Pikachu has insanely realistic fur compared to Sully, CG animation's come a really long way
Jun your comment makes no sense. I’m speaking on a level of skill, technique, and ingenuity that was the fur in Monsters Inc. As the video creator mentioned it had yet to be done. Comparing a movie 18 years in the future has no relevance to my statement.
@@Planclanman3 ...I'm just adding to your comment? why are you mad for no reason lmao
Etan Plan He is saying its crazy how much further CG animation has come even from how good Sully looks as well. Why you so upset? His comment is indeed relevant
@@Planclanman3 He was just adding to what u said. Definitely relevant
ugh i hate when people think of the arts and design industry as "Easy".
@@yigoh8437 trust me a lot of people do especially clients they say "why do you charge so high? it's just easy." then artists be like, "why don't you do it yourself if it's easy?"
TT Rides Hand drawn fans thinks computer animation is easy.
As a graphic designer U read ma mind
@@j04370859 but it is easier than hand drawing (both of them are really hatd yo accomplish)
Aggre why they people hate the Pixar disney
Pixar has advanced so much since the late 90s. What they can do now is amazing
Avery The Cuban-American nahhh no shitt 😒
@@juun9401 Who hurt you?
Oh hey! It's you again, I saw you last time. Nice to see a familiar username once in awhile.
And yeah! It really is amazing.
Well the polar express came out in the 2000s and the characters look almost human compared to other animated films
@@theamazingandtalentedblake8296 thats not regular animation where you draw and then render with cgi thats motion capture it's different.
Pixar has mastered the four elements
Water, fur, metal and lighting.
😂 this should have way more likes
We commited a mistake by allowing pixar to get the four elements, now they are too powerful to be stopped
Andrew Purcell wonder if these animation studios will master them which those are DreamWorks , illumination entertainment, blue sky studios and Sony pictures animation
5. World domination 😂
But everything changed when the rendering nation attacked
Now i want them to recreate the scene where woody is getting fixed. I bet it’ll look more satisfying!
izyn Hzwni Hmm, that wouldn’t be a bad idea! I’d definitely buy that box set! 😍😍😍🔥❤️🥳😭🙏😘
@@n00bie96
Man , like resident evil 2 or doom 2016? Thats a pretty cool idea!
izyn Hzwni I want to like this a million more times
999 likes
@@n00bie96 "Remaster"? You mean completely re-animate.
“If you wanna work at Pixar, you might need to know physics”
dang it😭💀
There are plenty of deparments where physics is not that important. It's mostly in fx and rnd where physics is important.
u can be a screenwriter so study story and writing, or can be a vis dev artist, or character designer, background and props, or story board artist!! u still have hope :D
Gabriela Sanchez thanks for the info, I’m interested in animation but I’m not the best with numbers and computers lol
@@charissesjournalmy dream is as background animator and work with all pixar director (Especially Pete Docter) .
Not true programs like blender have easy physics simulation for hair, and there open source
Never even noticed how bad it looked until now. in my memories toy story’s graphics looks like the new one.
Saitama how's the next episode going😄
It was 1995 dude
Greenleaf gaming 043009 y’all need to stop harassing me about the new season 😭 it’s not my fault just like it’s not nobody fault but the writers for GoT s7-8 being ass I’m just an actor man 😭😞
Same
It's almost like growing up with someone else. Let's say your twin. You don't notice how much they change until you look back at what they used to look like.
Animated movies are seriously under appreciated
I K R
They thought animation is easy
Oh Hell No
It Was Hard
They literally earn like billion dollars or way more than human films.
@@user-ij7um1ev9w I mean people typically associate animation being for kids, when they can be just as good as some of the greatest movies of all time e.g. the Incredibles
@@SSC0002 That's the old generation. Literally a lot of cartoons that older "adult" people can watch. Tons of "adult"people watch anime animated films and "kids" movies like superhero films. Especially there's a huge anime following among older people.
As the old guy in Toy Story 2 said " You can't rush art " ....
yep
"I'm not rushing art. I'm rushing you!"
Literally
@@GOKU8125
Which is the same thing=)
True
Toy Story 4 was just absolutely amazing. Their animations were crazy good, the lighting, the plot. Pixar just never fails to impress me, lol.
Yup lol and the wall and doorframe textures were enough to impress me. Don’t even get me started at the rain-
_TeaCupTea_シ honestly! even the FLOATING PARTICLES OF DUST when they walked through spiderwebs and behind shelves!
@@izzyy87 and they upgrade even more with soul . I wonder what improvement in Luca (2021)
M.Syauqi Abdurahman exactly! Cant wait.
As visually stunning as it is the movie should of never have been made, TS3 was the ending of the series for alot of people and 4 just came and screwed it up
I think the lighting in toy story 4 was absolutely stunning
The rain blew me away
it uses ray tracing which is something used in gaming too
Bazinga
Yes
I read this in Carl Wheezer's voice
Man we all grew up with toy story back toy story looked really nice. But now that i look back at it, it wasnt as good as i remembered. The scary part is, that itll keep on improving.
I just watched it again in honor of the new one coming out. I did notice some issues but overall it still looks pretty good! The biggest issue with it is the human designs. Everything else still looks pretty good for the first fully CGI film.
Sebastian?
why is it scary that it’ll keep on improving
I thought I was the only one! It’s scary cause I couldn’t fathom how it could improve when it looks like the best already!
Im Mortal I agree u don’t get as excited as when u saw the originals this almost seems like it was made by different people 😢
I dont remember the first toy story graphics being that bad
Yep, it is. There are even some clipping errors on some models and some textures that are completely pixelated and low res. It’s ok tho. It was amazingly done with the tech they had at the time.
You would have to look a little closer!
They probably seemed amazing when you first watched it because it hadn’t been done before
same.
Same
So basically all the other movies are just expriments and training so that they could perfect Toy Story
Lol
Idk probably
Well, if you replace Toy Story with Disney movies, you're pretty much spot on.
Pretty much 😆
probably yeah because that's their signature and original work which pixar has evolved from
Toy story 1: Beta
Toy story 4: 1.15 with optifine
Captain Virtu I like this
Is this a optifine reference
Le Bro this is a minecraft reference
@@uriah9645
Technically it a optifine reference.
Le Bro minecraft’s version is 1.15
Animation is one of the hardest jobs in the entertainment industry. I agree.
I'm working on hand drawn animation because my computer broke.
Yea and cg work as well
@@ShadowLimited310 I know but I want to bring hand drawn animation back to the mainstream and 2d animation software is not good enough for me (flash animation for example)
Im trying to bring hand drawn animation back too
@@babuska922 will you help me with my upcoming project then?
Seeing the new bo peep with fluid animation movements and facial expressions as surprising
She actually looks like intellectual
Nah, she looked way better in Toy Story 1 and 2
@@TheStOne1 she looked helpless in those two
@@poshmalosh14 It is only his opinion. But I like the new Bo better.
@@normalperson659 ik, she looks awesome
They even made those little cracks on Bo Peep's fringle, you know the one that appear on porcelain after years. Those tiny details really make it feel that the toon is very real...
What is bo peep
@@z.b.8168 a character in toy story
@@mercifulsnake226 Thank you, Sir. I am from Germany, so my English is not the best.
i'd love to see pixar "remake" toy story 1 using their new tech, just so we can really see how much of a difference it made beyond just comparing the first movie with the last one
@yasahiro hotaru so remastering a game is stupid too? the reason i said they should remaster 1 is because you can't properly compare the two because they are inherently two different movies, but if you remade 1, then you could have side to side comparisons of the same scenes, aswell as the fact that they could add new stuff if they wanted to since the tech has evolved so much. sometimes you can remaster something simply because you have better tech than when you first made the product, especially considering its been over 20 years now, so having a fully accurate remaster would be really interesting to compare it to.
and why do you get to say if its a waste of time and effort? if the staff at Pixar want to remake it using their new tech, then they should be able to, you don't even know if it even would be a waste considering it doesn't even exist, nevermind the fact that you aren't a staff there and that i'm just stating that i'd wish they did, its not as if i'm the one in control and can force them to do it, and i honestly don't expect anything like that for several years yet, if it even happens at all
@hotarou yasahiro you realise how remaking movies appeals to adults with nostalgia and kids who like Toy Story? And by appealing to both of them, it makes money, which doesn't make it a waste of time as it paid. So weeb, *your points are stupid.*
Lmao I love it when I read replies on a comment and people are having arguments and one person gets verbally destroyed so much they delete their comment
@@bloodprince9779 (1 month later but okay - sry for bad english) Its not the same remaking a movie than remaking a videogame. For example, Resident Evil 2 Remake took the original and improved its graphics AND mechanics, adapting the controls to make it easier to play in this generation. Not is the case with a movie, where you don't have an 'old' type of gameplay ( in this case the tank controls in the original RE 2) that makes the experience harder to enjoy. if you go to see Toy Story 1, it's still perfectly enjoyable, and remaking it would not only make the original "obsolete", but also wouldn't be more than a simple cashgrab like the remake of The Lion King. Toy Story 4 is perfectly valid for comparing how much animation has improved between these years.
Bloodprince original ones are always the best no matter how bad they were. Theyre awesome because they’re nostalgic, they remind us of our childhood, remaking it is just stupid while they can make new better ones. That’s the thing about animation industry, they move foward and get better each time, they dont go back to redo something. If I use that logic of yours, should I go to the museum and ask them to replace the antics with something better of this century? Theyre precious because they’re proof of how things have evolved to this stage, how they got better and it needs to be the one and only not to be faded away by some remake uh idk maybe because it’s called a CLASSIC?
To be honest, Toy Story 4 is by far the most realistic animated films (until they make another realistic animation)! I literally thought half the movie was real life!
Nokoltian Z isnt lion king much more realistic?
@@json_n lion king is animated, not 3D
Bloody Marina lion king 2019? Not 3d lul
Toy story 4 : i am the most realistic animated movie
Lion king : Hold my bear
You guys are all forgetting about The Jungle Book (2016)
Dang I don’t remember the toy story dog looking like that
Same here. It's probably because we're looking at it from an HD screen
Same
righttttt!!!!
Shit i just got done watching toy Story 1 and yeah the whole movie has a old feeling to the CGI it looks good still they did a very good job but the technology has obviously gotten better and yeah the dog looks pretty bad lol
Same
Did you noticed that andy in toy story 4 that shows the memories of andy playing woody had a different face than the other toy stories?
Same with Bo peep basically
Yep. They did that cause Andy looked really plastic from the older movies
@@eggbread8966 you mean reaĺly scary
@@fabreo4041 HAHAHA
He looked good in the 3rd movie, they should've stuck with that. But he looks too weird now when he's young!
You forgot about Brave, how Pixar tries to tackle more advanced hair (Merida's).
Not to mention the foliage. They really upped their plant game in that movie.
Ervan Solihin they mentioned it in the first video in the series.
They forgot to mention Zootopia
DrawMePlease07 Draw Zootopia was created by Walt Disney Animation Studio, not Pixar.
LonzoBroke Disney and Pixar are basically the same. Disney just owns Pixar
Andy: Hey Bonnie! I haven't seen woody in a while, where is he?
Bonnie: I lost him in the carnival!
Andy: YOU WHAT?!
YEEES
This could be a good idea for next one
New title
*finding woody*
*a 5 years old girl found dead in her front yard, suspect said that she deserve to die because she lost his fav toy*
@@jasontodd8599 for a long sequel or short sequel.
When I first saw the cat in Toy Story 4, I thought it was a real cat. I am really surprised it not real right now.
Me either,it was like an ACTUAL cat
Yeah it looked liked an actual CAT
*A C T U A L C A T*
C A T
*A C T U A L C A T*
I'm pretty sure after 10 more years we'll look back on toy story 4 and say, "Hey, I don't remember that cat looking that bad"
Well you can't really get much better than that. The cat is super realistic
@@martti1190 prolly for now
That cat is more realistic than a real cat bruh!
@@Nooneeeeeeeeeeee bbruuuuhh
hmmm I think the cat looked 97,2 % realistic.
They can still improve more, but not a lot. Barely a little.
It's insane how complicated computer animation is! I didn't know that it could be so difficult! It's amazing what animators can do these days!
The would have codes and programs set up now so they don't have to do everything from scratch.
They were creating programs with every movie and that's why it took so long.
It’s not that hard, but it’s still not easy.
@@echonuim it's definitely hard. That's why it costs hundreds of millions of dollars to create. A lot of grunt work goes into the details, it's possible that it takes millions of man hours.
666 liked
@@toadtv4389 yeah lol
To me, it just looks like they evolved from having them look like plastic unintentionally to them looking like plastic intentionally
But they were "plastic" toys both times...
@@user-dj2sz8qn1w Not all of them
So true
The evolved from plastic to glorified plastic
I always thought Bo Peep was made of plastic. Maybe resin or hard rubber, but porcelain? Never would have occured to me.
Wow, so not only do they make great movies, but they also use them as practice to become even better. That's incredible.
Pasta Heart yeah,i like how they challenge theirselves
the incredibles straight away came into my mind-
mahiraa same!!!!
I didn’t like this because it had 500 likes, and it would ruin the satisfaction
Edit: 511 now.
nO PUn InTeNdEd
I love how as technology got better, they chose to put the same amount of work into making a better product, instead of doing it faster to produce the same old thing.
True innovators of digital animation
Exactly the opposite of illumination studios
That cat looks more real than the cat in Captain Marvel.
True
Yea but That's not a cat. It's a flerken... So... It's fine.
@@MarhinasDiamond 😄
Ikr
@@MarhinasDiamond wh-wha- i- i don't think that's- no, no
Toy Story in 1995 was totally ahead of its time
Edit:I remember watching All the Toy Story’s in 1 day when I was little❤️💯
I couldve sworn I watched it premieres around 2000s as a kid.
Yeah me too! I thought toy story one and two came out in the early 2000s
Whoever watched Toy Story, damn was the water and rain super realistic in the beginning
Yes. Yes it was. And it was beautiful.
The rain on the windows.. wow
I was amazed by that scene as well!
Yes! It looked amazing.
it's plot maybe underwhelming compared to TS3, but i admit that scene -and the rest of the film, is breathtaking and gorgeous.
I didn't know how hard it was to animate, they have my respect.
*welcome to the Pixar school of witch craft and wizardry*
Lol true we are muggles in their eyes
Don't call Pixar the school of witchcraft and wizardry... Or else Draco's father will hear about this!
Lol
You're a Graphic designer Harry
WE’RE ALL USELESS MUGGLES!! BURN THE WITCHES
Coco (for me) is by far the most visually stunning Pixar movies. It’s just *gorgeous*
Agree
There’s one movie from the 2000s that had pretty realistic characters and elements and that movie is “ the polar express “
Thr colors, my gosh, the colors!
And the Good Dinosaur was absolutely stunning, not quite the same as Coco though.
Art Fun with Blake Lane Because it was done in motion capture. Pixar does everything from scratch.
I realized that every Pixar film is basically an art project done full-out
Grace Woofter not really, there’s so much science going into it as well
Cassandra Tay and math
@@valyouablecreationsstudio both of those things are frequently used in art
It’s all mathematics and physics.
@@Nick-kb2jc sometimes biology & anatomy too
The real question is why does the dog have big eyes
Nobody:
That dog: 👁👅👁
I guess to make it look not awful since the model is so crispy
It's from Japan.
@@thememeguy2195 yes yes
what the dog doin
Can we just give them a round of applause for giving my childhood, teenagehood and adulthood a smile👌💕👌
👏
👏👏👏
Indeed. I felt really good when i watched toy story 4, brought me back to a place i didnt realize i needed to be
No
Jessica no
PSA: Animators are responsible for the character performance only. If you want to refer to the other artists at Pixar (the ones creating realistic fur, water, lighting, etc) you can use the term VFX artist, or TD (technical director).
Alexander Curtis yeah, the guy in the video made it seem like the animators do everything
I know right?! Surprising that the creators of the video would put so much time into researching this video but get the main term wrong (headshake)
This bothered me so much.
Yes I picked up on it aswell very irritating
This is a common misconception and I hate it so much. The animators animate. They make things move. That is their one and only job.
This just made me appreciate Pixar that much more
im just amazed at how solid their earlier movies are, they knew their limitations and created a limited but solid and consistent look. sometimes its not about having state of the art tech but in knowing how to apply what you've got on a vision of suitable scale, they still look a hundred times better than lumination studios
Toystory 1 still good although It made since 24 years ago
agreed
Yeah it’s my fav out of them all
My second favourite
Yeah, it's a great movie. Though I remember it looking on the level of Toy Story 2, but that was just my memory seeing things as better because there wasn't much to compare it to.
Micha do your laudry and why does the text and call app play vids ?
I remember Toy Story 1 looking much more realistic but now it gives me goosebumps
Emkito true
That profile photo
Japan?
@@user-tg9qw8wl5u pretty sure that's not Japan but it def looks like Hetalia
the rain scene at the beginning of toy story 4 looks absolutely mind blowing
TheReal KingJ ikr I couldn’t stop focusing on that when I first watched it
Yeah
I gotta say the detail on that cat compared to the dog was just
*Wow!*
With all the action in Toy Story I’m surprised Bo-peep hasn’t shattered yet
Or her sheep
Bo peep never involved in the action lol
Endgame: I love you 3000
Toy story 4: To infinity and beyond
Bonny Cake not kidding I almost cried when they said that
LITERALLY
@@Laura-hn3tf don't lie, you sobbed like a baby just like the rest of us
Bonny Cake damn where these tears coming from 🥺
Miss Stilton not really
The fur on the dog looks like it's made out of cheap interior walls.
Edit: I was making an observation, not critiscising it.
Naw it looks like something I painted in 1st grade
I Like Evos cheap interior walls inside a evo..
@@xboys_archive They're not cheap, they're just-umm... l i g h t
I Like Evos It does lol
But you have to remember it was ground breaking and amazing back in 1995 :)
As a 3d animator, i think it was because the software they had wasn't as powerful at the time, having low quality textures was very common but it was still iconic due to how impressive the quality of animation was back in the 90's, at the time, 3d animated movies were still unorthodox
I like how Bo looked like in the first film, it has realistic features of a real porcelain figurine. Especially the eyes.
Bo in the first two movies soft spoken voice and sweet look just makes you want to hug her. She isn’t nearly as sexy in TS4.
honestly finding nemo is so impressive, like the cgi still looks beautiful watching today
It really does! The animation holds up better than even the following few Pixar films after that!
Wall-E too
I think this video underestimates the rain scene. The cat was amazing of course -- but when the movie starts, the rain drops looks so real that it was mind-blowing.
I believe they were not allowed to reveal that scene. But it was indeed awesome though.
The whole movie is CG.
It was so real that I thought I entered the Anabelle hall
exactly. at first i thought those scenes are real until i deeply look at the house then realised that's animated. i just amazed by that. also the chandelier light scene in the antique shop. i just love it.
Yeah
People Back in 1995: Damn this is good
Toy Story 4 Cat: Hold my Beer
Richael Mosen hold my catnip
hold my milk bowl
Hold my cat litter
Hold my... nvm
Hold my hairball
Animators: It took 2 years to make one Hank scene
Finding Dory: *has more than 12 minutes of Hank*
Me: D:
It took two years to develop the technology to animate Hank.
Luke Parsons ahhh thanks
Any modern movie: Our technology is like it was from the future!
Some animated octopus named Hank: Oh, interesting.
I'm just surprised that Toy Story 1 came out in 1995. It was just that long ago.
And imagine that there were 11 and 9 years in between Toy Story 2 and 3 and 3 and 4. If Toy Story 5 were to happen and they took that lonh, I’ll be almost 40 y/o 🙀
ToraydoBull Honestly that is crazy. I was 8 years old when the first one came out. I’m now 31 years old almost 32. What the heck!
I remeber seeing it in theaters at 8 years old.
@@ToraydoBull Actually Pixar movies don't really take that long to make, according to Tom Hanks it takes 4 and a half years to make one movie, the reason why they take so long to come out is because they're working on other movies at the same time and they have to get those out before Toy Story.
@@jerelminter 4 and a half years is still a very long time for a film that's only 1 hour 40 minutes long
Career suggestions:
1) -be a Pixar animator-
2) -be a doctor-
3) -be an engineer-
4) be homeless ✔️
Your profile pic just make this even funnier
HarryAteAllUrOreoz ya like Jazz?
@@_conejita_
Hobbies:
1) -swimming-
2) -painting-
3) eating ✔️
4) checking the views of despacito ✔️
lol
HarryAteAllUrOreoz 421 likes GODDAMNIT PEOPLE
How about merida from brave?? her hair is incredible
I guess it wasn't as big of a challenge.
He didn't talk about Violet's long hair in the Incredibles, but I'd bet that was a bigger challenge back then than Merida's curly hair
Even moana
Merida has more hair than Rapunzel
They from disney not from pixar.
@@kamilkastek3991 I know. It's just for a comparison of how much work went into Merida's hair
Now seeing all this toy story, I miss being in Toy Story land at Disney.
IT WAS SO FUNN. I JUST WANNA GO BACKKKKK
Seth Belfort, we’re in something called a pandemic right now
@@joeyjerry1586 lol😂😂
Covid
Just wanted to highlight Coco’s beautiful graphics, cause it’s too underrated and the whole movie was gorgeous.
It’s _definitely_ not underrated. I don’t know where you heard that, but it was one of the most popular movies of the year. Also because of the scenery and animation.
Tomato Brian Coco was NOT underrated. It was critically and commercially acclaimed for its art style and animation, and is considered one of the most respected animated films of all time.
I appreciate how it highlights Mexican culture and music, but it’s not underrated
btw i like your profile photo babe ♡
I guess it may be due to where I'm from, but in my country, Coco was truly underrated. So I just wanted to highlight that it's just my opinion and y'all have valid points as well.
I remembered the dog looking like this : 🐶
Not like this : 👹
LMAOO 😂
Oh believe me, he always did look like that.
Me too
difference between incredibles 1 and 2: baby got cuter
lol
And yet, no one is talking about Dash's hair 🤣
FineDecision elastic girl got thiccer
Architectural surfaces and furniture were vastly improved. The way Evelyn and other characters moved, sat, and stood was more life-like than previous films as well. The biggest achievement was probably the lighting though.
FineDecision And also the new look on Tony
Agnes Tang omg tony was stiff as hell
I swear the animation in toy story 4 is just too good.
Pixar POURS so much love into their projects. The physics research, water, rain, people animated, and clumping hair, is all so important to how their movies stand out from other animation studios.
I loved all the toy stories, Incredibles, finding Nemo, and more... It's insane how much they love their job.
they are like Ghibli with the good ol' American money-making strategy
toy story 1 is what video game graphics looked it in 2009 and that’s amazing
Yeah video game graphics were hard to master
Obviously Pixar pushes graphics faster than videogames, they are not only not being constantly put back by consoles limits, but they have hours to render every single frame, when a game has to render several frames per second.
Still, they've been pulling pretty impressive effects. Even when a good dinosaur is a so-so movie, it pushed photo realism to another level for pixar
I have a new found respect for animators. It was my dream to be one someday but I realized how patient I would have to be make these. Tim Allen and Tom Hanks said it takes 4 or sometimes 8 years just to make their movies and it makes sense see as how they manage to get to much detail in each character.
The detail in toy story 1 & 2 was insane for the time, the bag rollers in toy story 2 actually moved.
Sid's dog is an actual demon but no one in the neighborhood acknowledges it, they just keep the holy water on hand.
Imagine seeing him again... afraid of dolls like a normal human being. I imagine he joined some rock band guitar things, he seems like that kind.
Dang that dog tho
@@Ravera_gyxhe became a garbage truck driver. However, he does listen to music.
They forgot to mention the hurdles in animating Merida's wild, curly hair in Brave.
@Chewy Jewy Tangled was actually made by Disney Animation, not Pixar :)
Julia Day isn't Brave dreamworks?
@@hectorloza3321 nope. Pixar
I never forgot being 7 years old and seeing Toy Story 1 for the first time, I had spent my childhood watching 2D Animation so my mind was blown, I really thought the Animation was magic. People today most likely think that animation sucks but back in the 90s it was a breathtaking and groundbreaking.
And how much credit goes to the voice actors and not this amazing people behind all this amazing animations
Expectation: Animating just take patience and hard work
Reality: *YOU NEED TO BE GOOD AT EVERYTHING IN YOUR SCHOOL*
Sooooo difficulty Asian
The more you do it the better you get.
Wrong, I personally know one of the animators and he was a former police officer at Fort Worth Texas and now he’s one at Pixar and has worked on Toy Story 4 and the Incredibles 2 also Coco. So no you just need experience and effort
Animators don't have to be good at everything- they don't do everything. They make things move, and that's it. Other departments handle everything else.
You see too high lad, patience and hard work is more than enough. If you're talking about doctor then i can agree
Why did I cry when you said “24 years later”🤣
Catt The one and only that hit me deep af
Watching cars, cars 2 AND cars three growing up and they say 24 years.....
*i was born in 2007 and i some how feel old*
@@JesterLynx growing up with Cars 😂😂😂
@@JesterLynx damn, cars was your childhood Pixar movies? I'm so sorry
@@JesterLynx wow you feel old, 😂 what are you going to do when you actually get old?
Wow...i feel so old. So many great movies and many wonderful memories of watching them.
Good Dinosaur backgrounds:
Am I a joke to you?
Inside out lighting
THANK YOU
Two things
1. The scene with the fluffy toys attacking the grandma was so unexpected it made me laugh until I couldnt breath
2. The ending felt a tad rushed but was an ok ending in my opinion
My friend and i were dying, even the people sitting next to us gave us a weird look.
I don’t know about you, but I really don’t like toy story 4’s ending
Derpy Face To me, it was good and bad at the same time.
Moto Moto 3, your channel name and profile is a dead meme probably
@@wryt19 4 your username literally has awesome in it that just shows what kind of person you are as if your comment didn't
5 let people live ass hat
"There are no tentacles, no fur no shiny surfaces here, just a plastic fork"
Me "Ehm he´s actually a spork a spoon and a fork;)
William Schou Nilsson he is a shiny surface
Forky being a spork reminded me of the funny moment in Wall-e where he finds a spork and is trying to decide to put it with the forks or spoons and ends up putting it in the middle.
Jonathan Lumbreras get out nerd if you don’t remember that wholesome part u shouldn’t have the right o watch movies
aM ANJRY
@Jonathan Lumbreras
They're joking, my dude 🗿
Jonathan Lumbreras idk. 2 years ago?
I always did wonder how far the animation has come and the difference between that cat and sid's dog says it all for me.
It’s as if all the other movies Pixar made were just practice to eventually make a better Toy Story
Memetic Proportions EXACTLYYY WHAT I WAS THINKING LMAO 🤣
XD
I just saw it in theaters today, and man, it did not disappoint. It was one of the best movies I ever saw.
So basically...as far as visuals..
*Toy Story 1: Freshman*
*Toy Story 4: Senior*
I love these films though so don't get me wrong😂
Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within
Your wrong lol
@A youtuber 1mil I'm talking about how throughout each film, the visuals get better.
@@imanobody5898 I'm talking about the visuals of the movies, not the plot. 😂
I think it'd be the opposite... Cause seniors are usually tired to the core and beat up like the animation visuals from Toy story 1 😅😅
That cat is surreal and Bo Peep's new look is hella 🔥
But the best thing about the movie is the ending. As a 90's kid, I never thought I developed a deep connection in the Toy Story franchise. The parting scene was so emotional..
The ending kinda ruined the moment for me idk why but when i saw the scene i was like :/ wow definitely no foreshadowing led to that moment.
This video just made me realize how old these movies actually are.
That's the reason why you should definitely watch Toy Story 4 and Disney Pixar stuff, every single work is a masterpiece!
Even Cars 2?
@@UnprofessionalProfessor it's more on the animation rather than the story.
@@GreySeashell-j3m I can definitely agree with that.
I got tired of CG family films, but this made me realize how difficult it truly is to animate, and I have much more respect for them, now.
No one:
Sporky: “I don’t belong here!!!”
He's named Forky, not Sporky.
@Julia Wendt Hi trash I am nobody
BASURA
It’s Forky you uncultured swine
This. Is. Not. HOW THIS MEME WORKS!!! AAAAGGGHHHHH
Animators : Spends more than 30 hours over just one frame
Us: Misses 10 SECONDS of the movie, just to ask for more pop corns
Meanwhile animators : 👁️, 👁️
/ 👄
50 frames*
Man I’m just realizing now how much Pixar has been involved with my childhood
The humans don’t look like demonic beings from the 17th dimension of hell anymore
Yea. We can rest now knowing the baby from tin toy isn't coming to kill us anytime soon.
@@justyourlocalme2259 that was one of the worst animated babies I'd ever seen and that was Pixar's best work. They certainly have come a long way
@@lavendar-skies yea
Ikr sid ACTUALLY GAVE ME NIGHTMARES
@@chemicalwcrld so pLaY nICe
It’s crazy that In another 20 years it’ll be even better than it is now
2039: We can render Toy Story 4 in 2 seconds
In 20 years we'll probably have Holograms that look real. Right now they look like Toy story in 1995
@@Samirxkhan Holograms already look real. I've been to Springfield and in a museum, they had a dude in some theater-type place and he was giving an entire speech on Abraham Lincoln.
He was vivid and lively, then only at the end for him to admit he was actually a deceased soldier and he slowly faded away since he is a hologram. Never saw it coming.
@@xxxod I'm talking about real time holograms. Not rendered holograms.
Rendered holograms have been around decades.
We've only just started making movies using real time rendering with programs like Unreal Engine and it looks pretty good. But real time holograms look really basic. Check out Hololens.
And I'm not talking about things you have to go to a museum for. Maybe in 10 years time we'll have prescription glasses that project Holograms. Almost like a miniature version of the Hololens.
@@xxxod Wow. That seems like a pretty cool experience
I just marathoned all of the toy story movies and It was cool seeing the quality go up every movie.
Thanos: I am inevitable
Ironman: I am Ironman
Forky: I am trash
Edit: Wow!!! I did not think I would get so many likes... :)
Lol 😂
Forky should be in Smash.
Tech A Seat I could relate to forky
@@patricktsai2303 😂😂that shit was funny in the movie
Nobody:
Literally nobody:
Pixar: For 'Finding Nemo's' sequel we'll put an octopus that we definitely don't know how to animate and it'll take 2 years to complete 1 scene
Was this over used joke meant to be funny ?.
@@onehappypepper8732 oof
@@onehappypepper8732 Yeah it's getting to be the fidget spinner of comment memes.
ikr i think they started working on it in 2007
Don't worry bro I still appreciate the "nobody" format
Theory: They’re just really testing their new innovations of CGI with a good portion of their movies. Some of their movies exist just to fully master an innovation such as fur, water, etc.
@Nathan Wurtz I had that thought too
Not really
Actually, it's the short films that serve as R&D. The features are more born from story ideas from the start.
The only only movie they made that made me feel this way was Good Dinosaur
Next step: Create a holographic CGI city and put a man to live in there without knowing it's fake.
The Truman Show 2.
why am I crying watching this? I think it’s because I’m so proud of how much effort they went to to make my childhood 🥺