Blowback Versus Recoil Operated Pistols

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 жов 2024
  • Why does the barrel look crooked in my pistol? Why does a puny .380 ACP Beretta Cheetah have almost as much recoil as a 9mm Glock 19? Believe it or not, the answers to both of these questions are related. It all has to do with how straight blowback pistols work compared to short recoil operated (or locked breech) pistols. Today, I'm giving my best shot at explaining the difference. I tried real hard not to use any big science words, too. Mostly because I don't what they actually mean.
    Support our channel, buy ammo from Lucky Gunner!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,5 тис.

  • @SatanAzerath
    @SatanAzerath 5 років тому +261

    Why can't more videos be like this? He just gets right into the details. Short intro, short outro... Just a great video.

    • @52156drj
      @52156drj 3 роки тому +7

      My thoughts exactly.

    • @pauljnolan1000
      @pauljnolan1000 2 роки тому +8

      I, too, agree completely. Chris knows how to present a subject, explain it, and answer the pertinent questions clearly and succinctly. He and Colion Noir should use their name and facial recognition to move into Republican politics in the generation behind Tim Scott and Tom Cotton.

    • @Scout339th
      @Scout339th Рік тому

      I feel that you may like the add-on called Sponsorblock, it has the ability to skip a LOT of other segments that you dont care for other than sponsors

  • @stephenarling1667
    @stephenarling1667 4 роки тому +814

    "I took astronomy because they said there would be no math".

    • @fartybart6371
      @fartybart6371 4 роки тому +41

      Stephen Arling I felt that when he said it

    • @elmarmamaril3958
      @elmarmamaril3958 4 роки тому +33

      Same idea when I took Criminology.

    • @whiplash8277
      @whiplash8277 4 роки тому +20

      LOL. I took geology and then meteorology for my sciences...little to ZERO math at all. No math astronomy...like farty said “I felt that” Is so true.

    • @billpojas7126
      @billpojas7126 4 роки тому +14

      The notion that brought me into Psychology

    • @stephenarling1667
      @stephenarling1667 4 роки тому +13

      @@billpojas7126 Good choice. There are reasons clinical psychologists generally eschew true outcome studies.

  • @bishopm4401
    @bishopm4401 5 років тому +803

    Not gonna lie, this channel is one of the main reasons I get my ammo at lucky gunner

    • @nrbrown5985
      @nrbrown5985 5 років тому +35

      Bishop M the prices aren’t always the best, but the channel and shipping are out of this world.

    • @Whopperjaw.
      @Whopperjaw. 5 років тому +4

      Same

    • @Foxxnioxx
      @Foxxnioxx 5 років тому +28

      @ Wrong. They ship to Illinois, just not Chicago or Crook County.

    • @Kilonoid
      @Kilonoid 5 років тому +10

      Ni Oxx *Chiraq

    • @416loren
      @416loren 5 років тому +17

      When I first saw this channel I thought it was going to be an advertising shill but it has really good content. He is professional and gives me quality information without the drama.

  • @rperez327
    @rperez327 4 роки тому +77

    Not a gun owner/user, but as an engineer, I absolutely love this channel. I learn all about guns, ammo, and uses. Thank you for explaining this to a non user!

    • @southern_merican
      @southern_merican 2 роки тому

      Theres still time ti get a 🔫

    • @proto2580
      @proto2580 2 роки тому

      As a firearms designer / mechanical engineer, I wills say that he did a decent job of explaining the 2 mechanisms.

    • @clamum9648
      @clamum9648 2 роки тому +1

      Become a gun owner/user my good sir. Maybe you've changed your mind in the past couple years, unless you really don't pay attention to things nor think about things lol.

    • @clamum9648
      @clamum9648 2 роки тому +2

      @@proto2580 I've always thought firearms designers were really fricking intelligent people. Like... that's quite a thing to do. I'm a software developer, I'd like to think I'm above average and would think my co-workers throughout my career would agree, but I think just about anyone can do that. If someone is willing to learn I could teach them programming, honestly I don't think it's that difficult (more mysterious than anything else). If you can follow a recipe to make a cake or dish of that complexity, you can write software.
      Anyway. Cool career big 🐕 I'm jealous.

    • @proto2580
      @proto2580 2 роки тому

      @@clamum9648 Thanks! Your comments struck a chord with me. I have long though I should have become a coder. As a kid, I learned to code before most others. At 10 years old, I had a Commodore Vic20, but I didn't really get deep into coding as an adult. Software Dev pay is higher than ME, and you can work from home. A ME is a "traditional" engineer so we don't often get to work from home. Its also more hands on, so we are often required to be on-site and put hands on the stuff we design. However, I have friend who is a full time coder, and I know he's had some trouble in his career due to outsourcing to India. Meanwhile, for me, ME has been more steady.
      .
      Becoming a firearms engineer wasn't a conscious career choice-it was a job I needed at the time, and was years ago now, though last year, I did a consulting job where I designed another rifle.
      .
      Like any profession, the "cool" jobs pay less, as I am sure is true in coding. Designing firearms pays OK, but I make more money designing stuff in industries that are not well known or considered "cool". I make more money in industries that are considered "boring" by lay people, necessary/needed, and where talent is rare.
      .
      I recall running into a ME student back when I was working full time in firearms, and he didn't know that was a potential industry he could work in once earning his degree. He thought it sounded like the best job ever. For me, at the time, it was a job that paid the bills. .

  • @graeme3023
    @graeme3023 5 років тому +525

    One of the best explanations of straight blowback vs short recoil/locked beach firing mechanisms I've ever watched... Thank you!!

    • @cabotcat1
      @cabotcat1 4 роки тому

      Graeme I still don’t know what the difference is except one has a fixed barrel.

    • @harleyme3163
      @harleyme3163 4 роки тому

      great.. whats the difference.. the both use the guns recoil to chamber another round.. here's the types of operation. SINGLE SHOT, BLOWBACK and Gas operated.
      then again, I dont think he knows that :-(

    • @Kodreanu23
      @Kodreanu23 3 роки тому

      @@cabotcat1 exactly! he didn't explained the difference

    • @patrickdaly5068
      @patrickdaly5068 3 роки тому

      @@cabotcat1 Notice that both of the straight blowback guns he showed have external hammers, but the Smith doesn’t. I wish he had mentioned this and explained why. I can’t imagine that’s not germane. I need to look that up and see why. I’m sure you engineering types already know the explanation. Anyway, the slide blows straight back on the blowback pistols whereas with the recoil pistols the barrel tilts. The latter isn’t possible with blowback.

  • @skinnyengineer
    @skinnyengineer 4 роки тому +52

    This is a great video explaining the differences between straight blowback, and short recoil operation. If I may add, one little addition - in the early 20th century, there was actually a "blow forward" action, where the frame of the pistol stayed stationary, and the barrel moved forward upon the round firing, cycling the action. This was possible because of the enormous friction between the bullet and the rifling in the barrel. John Browning's short recoil operation makes use of this bullet / barrel friction in the same manner - in that, as long as the bullet is in the barrel of the gun, there is a forward acting force on the barrel. Simultaneously, there is a rearward force on the slide, from the pressure of the cartridge, which counters the forward force on the barrel. These two opposing forces briefly maintain the lock of a short recoil system, - until the bullet leaves the barrel and that forward acting bullet friction force disappears. It's a really ingenious system to keep the barrel and slide locked together until the moment the bullet leaves the barrel. Recoil springs can be made less stiff for larger calibers, making slides easier to rack. And the slide mass can also be drastically reduced. Thank you for putting these videos together -- they are entertaining and educational!

  • @kenhughes4715
    @kenhughes4715 5 років тому +914

    Excellent video. John Browning was a genius.

    • @markadams7597
      @markadams7597 5 років тому +22

      Ditto on Browning!

    • @notfamousprepper7369
      @notfamousprepper7369 5 років тому +12

      There are some awesome biographies out there on his life and inventions. Would highly recommend. His impact on firearms and in turn the world cannot be overstated.

    • @stephen8433
      @stephen8433 5 років тому +3

      I agree. ua-cam.com/video/1nskycsatTY/v-deo.html

    • @rickc2102
      @rickc2102 5 років тому +30

      Gotta give a shoot out to Beretta for having unique alternative genius, as well.

    • @anthonyluckett8687
      @anthonyluckett8687 5 років тому +1

      John browning had a room full of works invented things he just had the money to patient them sorry. To bust your bubble.

  • @MTB-ENG
    @MTB-ENG 5 років тому +43

    As an engineer, I think you presented the information phenomenally. The animation with cutaway was great too. Great video as always!

  • @thinman8621
    @thinman8621 3 роки тому +8

    This is maybe the best informative gun channel on UA-cam. Technical enough explanations to make sense but doesn't try to be a college class. Thank you.

  • @-RM-
    @-RM- 2 роки тому +6

    Attention all YT gun channel owners: Please note the brevity and quality of Mr. Baker's exceptional video intros that don't force me to fast forward 30 seconds at the onset of EVERY video. Thank you, Chris. Excellent as always.

  • @180SecondIdeas
    @180SecondIdeas 5 років тому +145

    Excellent. I learned something.

  • @gregr9548
    @gregr9548 5 років тому +12

    Highest compliments to you sir, for a superb video presentation. I am a professional video maker with a few years of experience (since 1970), and I consider this video to be the best technical and creative “training” video I have ever viewed - and I’ve seen a lot. I am not a firearms expert and thus do not speak to the “content”, but your team’s video craft is top notch. Lighting, sound, camerawork, animation, spokesperson “talent”, editing - all superb - thanks for making this available.

    • @LuckyGunner
      @LuckyGunner  5 років тому +3

      Thanks, Greg! It's pretty much a one-man show here :)

  • @cpt.honklerof3rdkekistania400
    @cpt.honklerof3rdkekistania400 5 років тому +34

    It's always interested me all the engineering that goes into firearms.

  • @danielswartz6818
    @danielswartz6818 2 місяці тому +1

    Just for your edification. The barrel on a 1911 designed by browning does not tip up the barrel stays level the entire time. All true Browning clones retain the non rising barrel. There is a barrel bushing that keeps the barrel in alignment. That is the main reason why it is hard to get proper ammunition for a 1911. Of course there are 1911s that do have a rising barrel but lack a barrel bushing. Next, there are still many guns made with the blowback design. One in question is a Ruger mark 4 for 22 that is a blowback design. Ruger also makes the SR 22 semi automatic that is also a blowback design. And in lower pressure cartridges blow back designs are commonly used.

  • @usptact
    @usptact 5 років тому +54

    I was wondering about that barrel design in Beretta M9A3. Now it is explained. Thanks.

  • @rickjohnson3215
    @rickjohnson3215 3 роки тому +8

    This helped tremendously. I own a S&W 380 ez and my wife just bought a Bersa Thunder 380. She is not that much into learning about guns so I needed a good way to explain the difference between the two. You do great work. Keep it up.

  • @percynjpn4615
    @percynjpn4615 5 років тому +160

    Great literate and intelligently presented explanation, as always. You and Paul Harrell are the best IMHO. Thank you.

  • @Rundu1987
    @Rundu1987 4 роки тому +1

    Im 52 and Ive been shooting for 32 years. This is the best explanation ever since.

  • @freedomfirst5420
    @freedomfirst5420 5 років тому +18

    Yup, John Browning was a true genius! Good, simple explanation!👍👍

  • @ChiefMac59
    @ChiefMac59 5 років тому

    Have used Lucky Gunner a lot
    Have been carrying pistols for 40 years now and this old dog has learned something new. Well done

  • @loquat44-40
    @loquat44-40 4 роки тому +3

    Always good to review the basics and I will not fault you for not doing a 1 hour video going over all of the locking mechanisms. I am interested in the gas delayed blow back systems. I have never fired one, but some say the recoil is managed very well by such systems.

  • @assetstopurchase8432
    @assetstopurchase8432 9 днів тому +1

    It is important to know the differences between the different operating systems/mechanisms:
    1- Recoil Operated Weapons:
    1- The barrel will move in all of these to ensure that the cartridge remains locked to the barrel till all the dangerous gases have escaped.
    2- Delayed Blowback Weapons: The backward travel of the bolt is delayed, so the dangerous gases don't cause harm.
    3- Gas Operated Weapons: The bolt is linked to a separate piston that moves it back.
    Whenever the the weight and the size permit, gas operated systems are the cleanest, the safest and the most reliable of all these systems, but they do have a slower rate of fire than blow-back systems.
    Recoil-operated systems are safe and cheap, whenever the weight and service don't permit gas-operated systems.
    Delayed blow-back systems are not easy to manufacture, so, i think, only HK manufactures them. The most recent HK system is also a gas-operated system despite over 70 years of experience with blow-back systems.
    The harder the steel, aluminum, or other metal, the lesser it will abrade when it rubs with softer metals. It will though wear the softer metal out, so some part has to wear out. If you use two hard metals, then they might abrade less, but both will abrade equally, so you might have to change both the parts eventually, but only if the usage is extensive.
    If a metal is too hard, it will break because it won't be even a little flexible. If it is too soft, it wear.
    Aside from wear, a metal needs to not expand too much with heat because this can also cause the parts to lock together and jam.
    Unless the metal expands a little, it might turn too hot, since it won't be a vert good dissipator of heat, and could cause premature ignition of cartridges. Most early blow-back weapons had cook-off issues, whereby the chamber would get so hot that it would fire the cartridges on its own, and only stop when it emptied the magazine or the belt.
    Blow-back systems also need thicker cartridge casings, so they don't rupture and explode.
    Early machine guns were water-cooled to keep the barrel cool. Now, all weapons are air-cooled, they just change the barrels on machine guns, whenever they get too hot.
    The barrels of all AK-47s expand after around 2 magazines of fully automatic fire, begin dropping the bullets at 50 to 100 yards, and lose all effectiveness.
    The American M16 uses the 7075 aluminum, which is very hard. The early Chinese copies used the softer 6000 aluminum.
    The best steel is 4150, but that is so hard that it needs very expensive machines and processes to cut and shape it, so, for small arms, most manufacturers use 4140 steel.
    Both polymer and aluminum reduce weight, and don't rust. Aluminum can get a patina, and even conducts electricity, but polymers can eventually degrade and crack.
    The dimensions are also important, because you need precise clearances or tolerances between the different parts, so they don't jam when they heat, yet, not so great to cause problems with the functioning of the mechanism.
    Stamped manufacturing is cheaper because it uses a press instead of labor. It can also be more uniform. Even most late WII weapons are stamped.
    The materials used in springs need specific coefficients of elasticity and precise turns/twists at precise angles, so they're neither too hard/soft nor compress/expand at the wrong angles. Most 3rd-world springing mechanisms will malfunction.
    The AK-47 is a Russian modification of the German Stg-44. The PPS 43 was a modification of the Finnish Suomi M/31, which itself was an iteration on the American Thompson SMG. The Mosin Nagant was an original Russian weapon designed by a consortium of Russian and Western designers hired by the Czar. The TT uses a Mauser cartridge with an iteration of the Browning mechanism. I don't think the Russians have very successful indigenous designs.
    The F-86 and MiG-15 aircraft were also very similar because both were iterations of German designs.
    Both American and Russian space and weapons programs employed German scientists and technology.
    Most weapons are different iterations of Mauser, Luger, and Browning designs, who were the pioneers.

  • @matthewrobinson4323
    @matthewrobinson4323 5 років тому +5

    Yours is one of the very few channels on which I hit the Like button before I even watch the video. I know from experience that you will present an excellent and informative video; one that's worth watching. This one in exemplary.

  • @nigelhutchinson5332
    @nigelhutchinson5332 2 роки тому

    Leaving out the math when doing general overviews is actually an excellent strategy for presenting something. Well done.

  • @al_lahn4264
    @al_lahn4264 4 роки тому +14

    This was a really great explanation. Concise, clear, well illustrated, and accurate.
    As a side note, I took Geology of National Parks and Monuments to get science credits that wouldn't require math. I knew it was what I needed when I heard it referred to as "Rocks for Jocks."

  • @ChattahoocheeRiverRat
    @ChattahoocheeRiverRat 4 роки тому +1

    Though I have shot for decades, I never understood the recoil vs. blowback dichotomy until seeing this. Love Lucky Gunner's videos.

  • @JoshuaBurton110213
    @JoshuaBurton110213 5 років тому +3

    I have the PX4 Storm and surprisingly I have to explain the rotating barrel. Not very common but I like the gun. Fun to shoot.

  • @DT-lr2bi
    @DT-lr2bi Рік тому

    FANTASTIC, I'm so glad I watch the channel to be a better informed pistol shooter. Understanding the mechanics and dynamics is important to me.

  • @marcelosoto-quiroga1965
    @marcelosoto-quiroga1965 5 років тому +4

    Excellent, dude! The first vid I´ve found so far that actually explains which are the differences and, most important, WHY are those two widely uses designs different.

  • @grim6980
    @grim6980 3 роки тому

    In the past month, I have wondered about this very subject a couple times but forgot to look it up when I sat in front of the computer. The algorithm has blessed me this day. I liked and subscribed.

  • @MSKommando
    @MSKommando 5 років тому +130

    Cool Video. Well explained. Greetings from Germany!

    • @jasonkeen9401
      @jasonkeen9401 5 років тому

      and New Zealand

    • @ranua9327
      @ranua9327 4 роки тому

      Spain also!

    • @MrLeo7627
      @MrLeo7627 4 роки тому +3

      Whats the story with A. Merkel is she a Communist ? Is it true some Muslim politicians are passing laws to remove Crosses out of Schools ?

    • @bakpfeife2224
      @bakpfeife2224 4 роки тому +3

      @@MrLeo7627 Maybe and no.

    • @lance-biggums
      @lance-biggums 4 роки тому +1

      @@MrLeo7627 she's not a communist. No major politician is a communist, they're just slightly different flavours of neoliberal

  • @douglasroyce5631
    @douglasroyce5631 3 роки тому

    I am glad I watched this video . I always learn from The Lucky Gunner videos . Truth be told , I was absolutely glued to it .

  • @aglock10glock34
    @aglock10glock34 4 роки тому +4

    Great presentation, I have a couple of the CZ 82s. Very reliable and accurate. The 9X18 MAK is also suitable for personal defense in my opinion.

  • @Gavreeli
    @Gavreeli 4 роки тому

    Very informative. I just acquired a Ruger P85 and I immediately want to tear it down and learn more.

  • @6pistons
    @6pistons 5 років тому +7

    Thanks for the informative video. Had always wondered how the slide moves after a round is fired.

  • @touge242
    @touge242 4 роки тому

    Kudos for not saying the powder explodes to propel the bullet. So few people understand the difference between a burn and an explosion. Also well done explanation on the actual topic

  • @JohnW-yv6yp
    @JohnW-yv6yp 5 років тому +58

    I already knew the difference, just wanted to see how your presented the information, and it was very well done. Great use of graphics and showing the inner workings of the gun. The frame by frams showing the barrel unlock was particularly cool.

  • @alexpotter5155
    @alexpotter5155 25 днів тому

    Studying to be a forensic firearms examiner and this information was fantastic. Thanks a ton.

  • @MKahn84
    @MKahn84 3 роки тому +3

    My guess on the difference in felt recoil:
    The blowback operated pistol has to have a stiff recoil spring, which means more of the recoil force is transmitted to the hand earlier. With the recoil operated pistol, the recoil spring can be much softer because it's job is mostly to push the slide forward again. That spreads out the recoil over a longer period of time.

  • @alphagt62
    @alphagt62 5 років тому +1

    In the straight blow back, the case stays in the barrel until the bullet exists the gun. The reason is that the pressure in the case, and in the barrel, causes the case to swell. The swollen case is ceased in the barrel, and once the bullet leaves the barrel it will shrink enough to slide back out of the chamber. The Hornady reloader’s manual has a great intro that describes what happens to a case as a gun is fired. And a LOT happens!

    • @alphagt62
      @alphagt62 3 роки тому

      Yes, the old Hornady manual has an excellent write up by the micro- second of what happens when the gun fires. Anyone interested in such things should read it, it’s most enlightening!

  • @CoordinatedCarry
    @CoordinatedCarry 5 років тому +84

    .380ACP case rupture brought to you by Michael Bay Ha Ha.

  • @christoney2491
    @christoney2491 4 роки тому +1

    I find myself coming back again and again watching your videos. Thank you for the great content.

  • @John.VanSwearingen
    @John.VanSwearingen 5 років тому +17

    Great use of graphics! Huge step up for the production quality for your channel!
    I had no clue that exploding gunpowder looked like the Walmart logo!
    6:50 Hi-Point would like a word, sir. Also Walther, but mostly Hi-Point.

    • @ILicence
      @ILicence 5 років тому

      @Sheldon Robertson The classic Walther PP series is blowback.

    • @asathomas84
      @asathomas84 5 років тому

      @Sheldon Robertson 90 years ago. But otherwise, I concur.

    • @keeganwebber
      @keeganwebber 5 років тому

      @UCb4OZy-q4DcRmijk4DVu_YQ i bought my wife a 2007 honda last year and i still think of it as essentially a brand new car. it's older than my first car was when i bought it lmao

  • @KMac329
    @KMac329 4 роки тому

    Yours is the first video I've found that explains the difference between and reasons for blow-back and locked-breech pistols clearly. NOW I get it, thank you.

  • @JP-hv5xm
    @JP-hv5xm 5 років тому +6

    this video came out just after I purchased my first blowback pistol (a sig P230) today. Thumbs up as always.

    • @d3ltaohniner261
      @d3ltaohniner261 4 роки тому

      P230 or P320? 🤔

    • @John_Malloy
      @John_Malloy 3 роки тому

      @@d3ltaohniner261 P230 is a blowback pistol. The Sig p320 is recoil operated.

  • @Diecastcars84
    @Diecastcars84 2 роки тому

    super best explanation for anyone who is in love with guns but doesnt understand the mechanics.

  • @shootinbruin3614
    @shootinbruin3614 5 років тому +5

    Liked before even watching because of the “big science words” part in the description. Too many pseudoscientists in the gun community like to explain things by saying “it’s physics” and using terms they themselves barely understand. Thanks for keeping it real Chris 👍

  • @whomagoose6897
    @whomagoose6897 5 років тому

    Best definition of Blowback v. Recoil pistols ever. A clear and concise explanation of the real meanings of two words that are not really the same.

  • @QuestionThings123
    @QuestionThings123 5 років тому +3

    What a great, educational video! Really enjoyed it, and although I had kindof always guessed at this about the difference between the two, it was great to see & hear it explained in much better detail. Good job all around, definitely glad you threw the slo-mo footage in there as well. Subbed. 👍

  • @davidburns6000
    @davidburns6000 3 роки тому +1

    Your explanation was clear, well thought out and easily understood by almost anyone. your communication skills are excellent.

  • @instantdethmouse
    @instantdethmouse 5 років тому +4

    I knew there was a difference between the two but never really looked into how or why they were different. As you stated, the Beretta PX4 Storm has a rotating barrel, both the full size and compact that is. The PX4 Storm Sub-compact, however, has a tilting barrel. I am guessing this is due to the limited space they had to work with on the sub-compact model compared to the compact and full size. Although, the one I own is in 9mm, so I cannot speak for the .40 caliber version. Awesome video, it's great to learn new things.

  • @unclepeteknows6217
    @unclepeteknows6217 4 роки тому

    Excellent video. I have been shooting for 40 years, but I never thought about this topic.

  • @CarryTrainer
    @CarryTrainer 5 років тому +20

    Good stuff dude

  • @yahulwagoni4571
    @yahulwagoni4571 5 років тому

    I am just beginning to learn about the use of pistols for personal protection. Don't k now much yet. This was very helpful to me in learning about basic design concepts for pistols.

  • @javierpatag3609
    @javierpatag3609 5 років тому +6

    Lucky Gunner/Chris, you guys should make a video about the CZ 83. Lots of good things being said about it, including in your own online but text-only review of the gun.

  • @Will-tn8kq
    @Will-tn8kq Рік тому

    Great video. I love how you didn’t waste 5 minutes doing a skit. You just shared information.

  • @Knifenerd
    @Knifenerd 5 років тому +4

    This information couldn't have been articulated any better. Great video!

  • @canabox7112
    @canabox7112 5 років тому

    I like a lot of gun channels but I think this is the only one I've never disagreed with. Not once!

  • @bryanchitwood6488
    @bryanchitwood6488 5 років тому +17

    Many thanks-- I was actually going to send an e-mail asking for a video on this subject after watching last week's video. I am recoil sensitive as a result of surgery and this is an important subject for me. I frequently read and see in videos that many people believe a fixed barrel semi-auto handgun is the more accurate of the two designs. This seems an important question in light of the fact that shot placement is a critical consideration when using lower caliber weapons, especially when we take into account your excellent series on on pocket pistols. I am a faithful subscriber and appreciative of the good work you do. Thank you.

    • @MrRPM110
      @MrRPM110 5 років тому +2

      Defensive accuracy isn't target accuracy. The shooter plays the biggest part in this. I wouldnt worry about how mechanically accurate a gun is, just how accurate you can shoot it.

    • @hirumaryuei
      @hirumaryuei 5 років тому +3

      If you're worried about accuracy with a handgun to the point where you're considering fixed barrel versus moving barrel, you're probably not a good enough shooter for the difference to matter. To be honest, unless you are a fixed mechanical rest or a robot, you are probably not a good enough shooter for the difference in a moving barrel to matter. Professional competitive shooters use mostly Browning-style tilting actions (most pro shooters use Glock pistols which are all Browning short recoil actions), which should in theory be less accurate than in-line Beretta-style actions, and pinpoint accuracy matters more for them than it ever will for an ordinary person.

    • @MrRPM110
      @MrRPM110 5 років тому

      @@hirumaryuei 👍

  • @terrycostakis6284
    @terrycostakis6284 3 роки тому +1

    Best explanation I’ve seen for something that I’ve wondered about for years.

  • @dcamnc1
    @dcamnc1 5 років тому +65

    There's also gas-delayed blowback pistols like the current Walther CCP, and the old HK P7's.

    • @SogoTX
      @SogoTX 5 років тому +3

      I ❤ my P7M8!!! 🥰 (But it sure does get HAWT...) 😉

    • @p0331546
      @p0331546 5 років тому +2

      Hey man take a look at Laugo Arms Alien. It's basically an upside down P7 internally, solving the heat issue I guess.

    • @ostiariusalpha
      @ostiariusalpha 4 роки тому +6

      And let's not forget the Remington M51 pistol's hesitation lock, designed by John Pedersen. The man was another firearm genius, recognized and admire by JMB himself, but dang if all of his stuff wasn't super fiddly to just field strip for routine maintenance.

    • @rhinovirus2225
      @rhinovirus2225 4 роки тому +1

      Steyr gb and laugo alien as well

    • @marksummers463
      @marksummers463 4 роки тому

      Love my p7.

  • @dvldog_
    @dvldog_ Рік тому

    Can we just take a moment to appreciate John Browing and how amazing his designs are? Gun nuts and military history nerds, such as myself, know the impact he made, but not everyone knows how revolutionary his designs were... there aren't many engineers/inventors/designers, etc. whose products have remained as useful, relevant and influential as Brownings... just the 1911 and the M2 .50 cal. alone are prime examples... the US military has used the M2 for 100 years or so with only minor adjustments made to the weapon, including adding a safety and a self-timing and head-spacing barrel....... pretty impressive IMO...

  • @joemorales3498
    @joemorales3498 4 роки тому +6

    Thanks for the education. I honestly needed the lesson.

  • @paulhillsdon692
    @paulhillsdon692 5 років тому

    Best description for the majority of youtube watchers. In a matter of minutes, it was explained true, and I understood what all the other videos don't break down to a simple and clear point. Well done.

  • @MrArob826
    @MrArob826 5 років тому +3

    Thank you for explaining this. Being that I own Hi-Points, Berettas and S&W, I have a better understanding of the operations

    • @dozer1642
      @dozer1642 5 років тому +2

      Brave man admitting you own Hi-Point pistols. I did that once in a comment section and was lambasted for weeks because I owned a pistol that was so inferior to everyone else’s thousand dollar handguns. I really don’t mind my Hi-Point at all. I kind of like it really. It puts a 9mm hole in anything I point it at, and it has a lifetime warranty.

    • @MrArob826
      @MrArob826 5 років тому

      @@dozer1642 Exactly

  • @Rebel-Forces-Earth-007
    @Rebel-Forces-Earth-007 5 років тому

    I always wondered why the barrel on my H&K P2000SK tips up and rattled a bit. Cool video.

  • @nathangarcia4522
    @nathangarcia4522 5 років тому +11

    The first and only time I ever fired a .380 I was shocked at how sharp the recoil was. The only blowback guns I ever used long term were both delayed blowbacks---HK P7 and FN Five-SeveN.

  • @inaobenland5360
    @inaobenland5360 3 роки тому

    Found my new Go-To place for info! To the point. Clear explanations. The visuals and cutaway diagrams were excellent. So many questions answered simply and straightforwardly. This is the kind of video I look for but have difficulty finding. It fills the gap between beginner level material (which is far too simple) and advancedtinkerer/gunsmith/armorer that is far too advanced for me. Sign me up! I am a new subscriber!

  • @Treblaine
    @Treblaine 5 років тому +3

    It should be noted that the forces applied as the bullet is travelling down the barrel are so massive the spring strength is irrelevant. Even an extremely powerful spring, a spring so strong you'd need a crowbar just to open the slide a millimetre would hardly slow down the slide at all in the moment. This is because the FORCE applied on the slide is huge, it's as large as the force pushing on the bullet but the other way. Pressure acts in all directions and the base area of the cartridge is about equal to the base area of the bullet. Any spring applying even a fraction of that force would be far too strong to open the action.
    This is what's important about inertia, high mass resists high forces with low acceleration but over a long period of time this acceleration will mean the mass will just keep going so this is only good for brief periods. Springs keep slowing down (and actually apply more force when compressed more) so springs are negligible in the moment of firing but hugely important once the bullet has left the barrel and the slide is now travelling at quite a high velocity.
    If the slide is 100x the weight of the bullet then it will be accelerating at 1/100th the rate of the bullet (force = mass X acceleration). Acceleration isn't constant as bore pressure (therefore "bolt thrust") will vary but it will vary equally for bullet and slide, over time they'll have the same ratio of acceleration. This means a slide that is 100x as heavy as a bullet will have a velocity 100th as fast as the muzzle velocity of the bullet.
    The distance an object travels under a given acceleration is directly proportional to its acceleration. So if a slide is 100x the weight of a bullet, then it will have travelled 100th the distance the bullet travelled within the bore (so not barrel length but barrel length minus case length). Slightly more as the bullet is slowed down by friction with the barrel. So a 100mm long (4 inch barrel) will logically only open 1mm if the slide is 100x heavier than the bullet. That's probably very little travel. The case could probably travel much more than 1mm out of the chamber before any real risk of case bursting.
    Remember, the inertia of the slide must equal the inertia of the bullet. This is where the spring actually helps, it doesn't help keep the chamber closed, but it works on the slide over the much greater distance and time period which is as the slide opens all the way, the spring (hopefully) slow the slide down steadily over time so by the time the slide hits the frame it isn't going quite so fast. A stronger recoil spring means more velocity will be taken out of the slide as it's travelling backwards. A light recoil spring will will barely slow the slide at all before it hits the frame and transfers all that remaining inertia into the frame in an instant. This transfer of inertia will be REALLY fast, faster even than the transfer of inertia from the bullet to the frame of a revolver. This is how some straight blowback pistols can be REALLY snappy.
    One thing that shouldn't make a difference is recoiling mass as whatever the mass is, it must equal the inertia of the bullet fired.
    Even on browning-style short recoil guns, the barrel and slide moving together isn't any different than a much larger and heavier slide moving backwards in terms of amount of inertial imparted from the bullet. The difference with an unlocking barrel is you have the inertial mass split in half and stopped quite separately in time. The first when the barrel unlocks the barrel stops very quickly, then the slide is slowed down by the return spring before it locks open and dumps any remaining inertia into the frame.

    • @RobotDCLXVI
      @RobotDCLXVI 5 років тому +1

      Thanks for the slightly more detailed and mathematical explanation.

  • @johnheckler3108
    @johnheckler3108 3 роки тому

    Very clear, and the slow mo helped considerably

  • @stephenarling1667
    @stephenarling1667 4 роки тому +6

    So the common locked breech design combines the inertial mass of slide+barrel for the duration of the bullet's travel down the barrel.

  • @kenrimorin2688
    @kenrimorin2688 Рік тому

    Chris does a great job, I've been shooting for50 years and still learn a ton from his videos, thank U.

  • @SlavicCelery
    @SlavicCelery 5 років тому +18

    Good animation, it helps explain that quite well. When I was in middle school reading Jane's, I would have killed for that.

  • @kirkmarrie8060
    @kirkmarrie8060 4 роки тому +2

    This is one of the MOST OUTSTANDING PRESENTATIONS that I have had the honor to receive! Thank you, so much! SO INFORMATIVE.

  • @stevenkennedy4130
    @stevenkennedy4130 5 років тому +5

    Never bought from Lucky Gunner Ammo before today. But after watching these vid's, I pulled the trigger, & bought a 500 round, Span can, of Wolf ammo. Keep up the good works!!

  • @wbwills2
    @wbwills2 4 роки тому

    Thanks. Have heard of all that stuff. Better understand now. Still completely lost on rotating style. Nothing but time. Studying up. Have a good on & happy holidays

  • @drain_001
    @drain_001 5 років тому +4

    Mechanical Engineer here... good job Chris :)

  • @sfertonoc
    @sfertonoc 5 років тому +1

    I like the idea of the Wather CCP having a port to use pressure to prevent temporarily the movement of the slide by blowback. The spring as a result is much lighter and recoil manageable. It also is very accurate and easy to shoot up to 25 yards as a sub compact.

  • @Jc-ww5kg
    @Jc-ww5kg 5 років тому +4

    Thank you for the video. Your insight is very helpful. Keep up the great work!

  • @paulwolf2775
    @paulwolf2775 5 років тому

    I must confess, I've been around, and shooting different handguns, over the years, and, I wasn't sure about how to explain the differences. Thank you for explaining them. Btw, admitting not knowing something, is probably a good way to learn more about it. No one is an expert on everything.

  • @louiscatoire3269
    @louiscatoire3269 4 роки тому +7

    As a retired Professional Mechanical Engineer and an avid gun advocate for over 50 years, you did a great job explaining the differences. Great work!

    • @louiscatoire3269
      @louiscatoire3269 4 роки тому

      The only thing I can think of to add is regarding simple blowback pistols: the high pressure and heat in the barrel (once the ignition has begun AND while the bullet is still in the barrel) causes the cartridge case to expand. Most cases are brass and this causes some friction between the cartridge case and the inside of the barrel's chamber, which helps slghtly delay the rearward motion of the slide until the bullet exits the barrel and the pressure/friction reduces.

    • @ostiariusalpha
      @ostiariusalpha 4 роки тому +1

      @@louiscatoire3269 Obturation is the technical term. There are one or two delayed blowback designs out there that actually try to harness case obturation to slow cycling, but they were never very successful.

    • @louiscatoire3269
      @louiscatoire3269 4 роки тому

      @@ostiariusalpha You are correct. Obturation has a very minor, if any, effect on slowing the cycling. It depends on the pressures involved, the case material (aluminum and steel cases have even less effect than brass cases), and the roughness of the inside of the chamber. I've read some manufacturers even tried to make the chamber interior rougher to increase the effect, but brass cases are just too soft to make this a useful experiment.

  • @HenryLoos
    @HenryLoos 3 роки тому

    I was interested by your explaination, I enjoyed it, I have been Bulleye style shooter for more than 50 yrs, and still shoot now.
    Thanks, Henry Loos

  • @leob66
    @leob66 4 роки тому +15

    I wish more ammo was available right now. Damn Covid-19 messing everything up.

    • @SI0AX
      @SI0AX 4 роки тому

      So people bought ammo like crazy? Can you buy ammo online?

    • @HTown99
      @HTown99 3 роки тому +2

      The George Floyd riots probably had a huge impact on new people buying guns and the ChinaVirus lockdowns led to hunting & target shooting being some of the few recreational activities people could do due to the inherent social[ism] distancing involved

    • @bobsmoot2392
      @bobsmoot2392 3 роки тому

      Politicians make decisions for/against us. That is the cause of most everything in our lives.

  • @wilhelmtaylor9863
    @wilhelmtaylor9863 4 роки тому

    I've wondered about this but never bothered to researched it. Now you made it easy. Thanks.

  • @pantslizard
    @pantslizard 5 років тому +21

    I've always found it amusing that the "pinnacle" of firearms technology was reached 75 to 100 years ago...
    Time to switch to focused energy weapons...I guess it's time to go to my secret underground lair... ;>)

    • @suprememasteroftheuniverse
      @suprememasteroftheuniverse 5 років тому +3

      I want my BFG 9000

    • @pantslizard
      @pantslizard 5 років тому +1

      @@commie9740 - Holy Shit that was Awesome(!) ...BUT...they need to get it up to around 2800+ fps...then I'll take 10,000. ;>)

    • @pantslizard
      @pantslizard 5 років тому +1

      @@commie9740 - ikr

    • @ostiariusalpha
      @ostiariusalpha 4 роки тому +2

      Well, they didn't have the direct impingement internal piston 75 years ago, so thank you Gene Stoner!

    • @grayeaglej
      @grayeaglej 4 роки тому +2

      100+ years ago we weren't burried in thousands upon thousands of unconstitutional anti-gun laws that are crushing innovation on performance. Companies cant get sales high enough to be able to take risks, especially when most product changes have to prioritize conforming to thousands of Federal and State laws.

  • @cforn
    @cforn 5 років тому +1

    VERY well done. And, speaking as someone who knows a good bit about physics, your descriptions of the operation of the slide and the forces involved was both accurate and easy to follow.
    Again, well done!

  • @CHMichael
    @CHMichael 3 роки тому +5

    Forgotten weapons - he takes them apart and does a great job explaining the mechanics.

    • @matisseenzer2383
      @matisseenzer2383 3 роки тому +1

      Yup, also does "how it works" short videos:
      Difference between the LOCKING SYSTEM and the OPERATING SYSTEM: ua-cam.com/video/JPuTx7NeBKE/v-deo.html
      How Does it Work: Blowback Action ua-cam.com/video/lXVPUxqbgII/v-deo.html
      and not blow-BACK but blow-FORWARD: ua-cam.com/video/rk8G5-cJvR8/v-deo.html

  • @robertrenstrom4668
    @robertrenstrom4668 3 роки тому

    Great job Chris. I saved the video and downloaded it to my tablet so that I could review it iterations before it's going to register too. Looks like I'm going to have to go over the bread at 92 explanation a couple of times.

  • @Govna-wy4ib
    @Govna-wy4ib 5 років тому +13

    Great vid, as always. Wish You could deliver to Chicago but they like to compete with the NE and west coast to see who can limit the most freedom.

  • @Asertix357
    @Asertix357 Рік тому

    Much more informative than the wiki pages on firearm operation methods.
    And you're right, blowback firearms definitely have more felt recoil. I've shot the blowback-operated Bersa Thunder in .380, and the recoil-operated Glock in 9mm, and the Bersa's recoil felt so much worse to experience.

  • @drdes9609
    @drdes9609 5 років тому +7

    John Moses Browning I mean jeeze way ahead of his time

  • @rockroll9513
    @rockroll9513 4 роки тому

    Great video on blowback vs recoil/locked breech.

  • @BishopBigans
    @BishopBigans 5 років тому +229

    No math in astronomy? What kind of school did you go to?

    • @mychevysparkevdidntcatchfi1489
      @mychevysparkevdidntcatchfi1489 5 років тому +60

      Almost every school offer Astronomy for non-tech/science majors. They mainly talk about constellations and concepts. Some actually take interest and move on to math based courses and few even switch majors to tech/science. It's sort of a gateway drug.

    • @mojogogo1773
      @mojogogo1773 5 років тому +2

      @POLAR BEAR yessir, you speak the truth.

    • @SubparSFC
      @SubparSFC 5 років тому +2

      Exactly why I took that class hahaha

    • @BeachsideHank
      @BeachsideHank 5 років тому +5

      Def no math in Astrology, just word salad.

    • @jolioding_2253
      @jolioding_2253 5 років тому +14

      astronomy =/= astrophysics

  • @gfweis
    @gfweis 4 роки тому

    This guy puts out so many informative and helpful videos that if I had to buy ammo I'd buy it from his store.

  • @myusername3689
    @myusername3689 4 роки тому +12

    Recoil operated and gas operated: *talks in brass*
    Blowback: I can’t understand your *_A C C E N T._*

  • @fly1327
    @fly1327 4 роки тому +1

    Just the most straightforward and simple explanation of the differences. Thank you!

  • @jonnyl2001
    @jonnyl2001 5 років тому +5

    Thanks. Im one of those people that didnt really know the difference

  • @TheExplosiveGuy
    @TheExplosiveGuy 5 років тому +1

    Very informative, the best explanation of the subject I've ever seen. The highpoint makes so much more sense now...

    • @urdaddywingnut7820
      @urdaddywingnut7820 5 років тому

      It really does help explain the hella gaudy "lunky" look of the HiPoint pistols. I've always told my friends it was because they needed all that extra weight being a blowback operated handgun, but could never explain it as well as seen here.. .Good job LGA!!!

  • @easyfiveOsink
    @easyfiveOsink 5 років тому +3

    You didn't mention the Astra 400 and 600 pistols in 9mm Largo and 9mm Parabellum. Successful blowback designs that relied on massive recoil springs.

    • @1014p
      @1014p 5 років тому

      J P so 9mm parrabelum is a standard 9 x 19 Luger bullet. So not sure why it would be so different from normal spec. The 9mm largo 9 x 23 is lower pressure case based on reading. So it wouldn’t make sense a stronger spring is needed. My guess is the stronger recoil spring kept it in place just a bit longer.

  • @aredman22
    @aredman22 4 роки тому

    Great explanation. I've tried to read about the difference, but no one has explained it a clearly as you.