Why President Trump Losing HIs Gun Rights is Bigger Than You Think
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
- Following up on what has been a total S-Show in New York, news broke that following President Trump's conviction on 34 felonies the State would be moving for immediate revocation of his firearms rights. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses the huge implicaitons of this, not only for President Trump, but for thousands of Americans who find themselves in a similar position. The plight on the non-violent felon is one that our country must come to grips with as there are countless individuals who have made mistakes, but deserve the chance to restore their inalienable rights. So learn why this is so important to all of us and arm yourself with education today.
_____________________________________________________________________
Have a Video Idea? forms.gle/GNCy...
_________________________________________________________________________
Join Right to Bear Today.
Right to Bear Self-defense protection so that you can protect those you love. Sign up today and if you use the promo code WGL, you will receive 10% off: bit.ly/3Io5T5H
- Legal Protection for Self-Defense.
- Confidential Hotline with Your State's Attorney
- No Caps for Criminal or Civil Defense
- Covers all forms of self-defense, from a fist to a firearm.
- Some of the Nation's Most Passionate 2A Attorneys to Defend You
Visit our good friends at protectwithbea...
___________________________________________________________________
Contact Washington Gun Law
If you have any questions about this topic, or anything else related to what's left of our Second Amendment Rights, remember you can always contact us at:
www.washingtongunlaw.com or call us directly at 425-765-0487.
Stay safe.
_________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to us on Rumble. rumble.com/c/W...
Subscribe to us on Patreon. www.patreon.com/WashingtonGunLaw
Remember, you can follow us at www.washingtongunlaw.com
Like us on Facebook at WashingtonGunLaw
Follow us on Twitter @GunWashington
To fix the problem is abolish the gun control act of 1968
That's a start, than repeal the rest
The GCA of 1968 is basically the grandfather of almost all modern Gun laws. Needs to be repealed.
But the way, it was put through by a democrat controlled House and Senate and signed into law by LBJ. A liberal democrat for president for those who never heard of him.
You forgot the first 'NFA' BS...
NFA of '34, you mean, since *EVERYTHING* else, including GCA of '68, is technically an "amendment" to NFA '34. Rip out the "basement" that is the NFA of '34 as the totally unconstitutional mess that it is, and the entire house of cards falls.
1934
In NJ, I’m fighting to keep my rights (the state voided my Firearms Purchaser ID Card without any express stated reason) when the state has been denying/revoking licenses solely on having a history of being merely accused (no prosecution involved).
The same NJ AG that is the top named defendant on the draft of my Complaint (Platkin) is now trying to revoke Trump’s golf courses’ business licenses based on the owner having been convicted.
What business owner loses their right to a business license for an unconnected conviction?
The obvious overreach of the govt is stunning.!!!
@@diannebuckhout9298SICKENING! NOT STUNNING!
Looks like a infringement.
Now it is perfectly clear why the Supreme court voted that felons now have a right 2 carry! Gave baby T a nice gift!
It doesn't Beg the question, it raises the question. As a lawyer you should know begging the question is a logical fallacy. People beg the question in court all the time.
A layman can intuitively see that the Code is not Constitutional. I don't understand how it has stayed on the books unchallenged this long.
NOT ALL FELONS ARE DANGEROUS....NOT ALL ARE VIOLENT....
Would he be REQUIRED to surrender them, or could he legally transfer ownership of any personal weapons registered in NY.
I hope the Supreme Court steps in and Trump does not lose his Constitutional 2A Right. Trump also should remember how precious this 2A Right is, taking guns first and worrying about multiple Constitutional Rights later and telling the ATF to change a rule to essentially creates their own new law criminalizing the previously law abiding citizenry is not how it is supposed to work.
It's a moot point! If he wins reelection he'll pardon himself! If he doesn't he becomes irrelevant!!
God Works in Mysterious Ways 🙏
He'll get them back when he becomes president cause constitutionally he can remove the barrier federally
ty
Trump *needs to *immediately* set the 2a gun situation up on appeal to scotus.
Immediately.
That ckd stop him from being Pres if 2a violation is allowed to continue...
Great video. Thanks
Who is stupid enough to take responsibility for Trump's life safety? Taking someone's right to protect themselves, falls on the person taking those rights, whether a judge or other, they then take full responsibility for that person's safety and if they do not protect the person, they are liable as they should be!
You can't lose rights. They can only be violated.
Exactly!!!
If you lose your freedom,
Then you have lost your rights!
We have a Bill of Rights
Not a Bill of Privileges
A Right cannot be taken or lost.
A Privilege can.
Shall Not Be Infringed does not have an * next to it.
The founders were considered violent Terrorists, Murderers and Thieves by their own government.
They went to war with their own government when they tried to take firearms from them…(Lexington and Concord… Shot heard round the world)
Why would they let the government take firearms from any Americans because the government thinks they are dangerous?
something something ''take the guns first, then due process after''. lol, 🤣😂🤣
@@investigativeoutcomes9343 Famous words by Trump, who BTW is losing his rights. LOL!
Stripping a person of your 2nd Amendment rights is part of the punishment! Totally Unconstitutional!!!
I hope this makes him super 2A after this!!!
Going bankrupt made him less fiscally conservative (8 trillion in deficits), so he'll probably hate on the 2A even harder, this time.
It won't, he is a Traitor Mason for the Terrorists of i$LIErael, who did 911 with the bu$h Traitors.
If he was a gun guy to start with, then it should. But, I don't think he was, since he has probably had armed security for years.
@@chrissewell1608 I don’t think he is either, I don’t totally hold it against him, however we shall see. What I do hold against him is what he didn’t do for guns during his presidency and him kinda trying to sound like he is going to do more, if he gets in and tosses out everything in the NFA and GCA then maybe I can accept.
@Tyborg425 Highly unlikely. He's a democrat through and through. A loud mouth, a liar, a hypocrite and a crook. He's been giving donations to the left for years. Only reason he ever ran for president was for the attention, which he's getting, and he's loving every second of it.
I still can't comprehend why citizens allow their government to take away a RIGHT, not a privilege but a right. Why do US citizens allow their government to get away with this kinda shit?
Ah, so they don't spend their life behind bars!? Maybe?
its a right until you fuck it up and lose that right - and its not a right to a bump stock
@@robi6317 that fact the citizens allow the government to take it away makes it a privilege not a right no? All gun laws are are an infringement
@@chrissewell1608 if that's the case the citizens will allow their government to do anything without repercussions. Civil war is coming
Because the US citizen became SOFT. They forgot HOW to fight a government and WIN!
NY: No guns for Trump.
7 mos later: Trump has a nuclear arsenal and other stuff....
Tanks
Fighter jets
Aircraft carriers
Patriot missiles
All the cool toys. All open carry. And not a single one equipped with a suppressor. 🇺🇸
he wont
But biden DEWed MAUI?
and Chile?
We the people will not comply
No, we will. And have. That’s where we got where we are. We can say that all we want, but in comparison to our founding fathers, we are all cowards.
@@capella95agreed, but felons and guns is a slippery slope. Tough discussion for sure.
@@hercflyerthere is nothing slippery about it.
All Free Men have the Right to keep and bear arms. Period.
@@hercflyer You mean EX felons! Once they have paid their debt to society, I don't look at them as felons. How are they supposed to become productive members of society when they are constantly reminded they will never be any more than second class citizens???
@@capella9530 attempted murders... I am no coward. I fight like bloody hell sometimes
Never relinquish your means of self-defense.
No city, state, Congress or the President may curb, suspend or end your rights. This is the definition of a Constitution. The violations to it over the last 100 years are not constitutional.
He won't lose shit. The ruling is likely to be thrown out due to jury misconduct and won't be brought up again.
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE PERMANENT Released from prison = no longer a felon, but a rehabilated LAW ABIDING CITIZEN and again have the right to exercize 2nd amendment rights.
Federalists papers state "No Free Man shall be Denied his Right to Bear Arms"
Imagine if Americans could live like Americans😂
Most of the time someone who has been released from prison will end up back in prison sooner or later. So no, I don't think it's a good idea for felons to own firearms. Keep in mind that I'm hard core pro gun, and do something firearm related almost everyday, sometimes several times a day.
Okay, then he still needs to go to prison and get out!!
@@BulletSpoung And you just haven't been caught!
I think this is at least in part a consequence of what I call Felony Inflation. Once upon a time "felonies" were capital crimes, subject to the death penalty: murder, rape, armed robbery, arson, etc. Too many regulatory offenses have been legislatively boosted into felony status by legislators as a way of showing how much they "care", and to give regulatory authorities more power.
In Tennessee, camping on public property apart from specially designated spaces is a felony. By the letter of the law, simply setting up a folding chair next to your fishing rod is "camping".
Absolutely correct!
@@macroman91 Why aren't you workign to change that?
@@HarryPost-o9c Because I spend all my time correcting online spelling mistakes!
Then they added RICO to their armory of prosecution tools...
I would love for both Trump and Hunter to get these bad gun laws overturned.
EXACTLY!
I agree, as much as I hate Hunter, these stupid laws need to go.
@@dalegreen1445theyre "laws" and they cant "go" they can only stop being enforced as if theyre real anyway if we fight back physically like the second amendment intends for us to be as shown by the past over a century now that we've been trying peaceful means and get nowhere but more and more "laws" enforced on us as if theyre real anyway
The lying on a form by hunter is the least of his crimes.
@@NoneYaBiz5 thats not even ancrime because the papers themselves to buy a weapon "legally" is a crime so its more that he filled them out at all thats the crime
Would someone permanently lose their first amendment rights for using vulgar language in puplic? Permanently removing second amendment rights for non violent crimes is absurd!
I'll mention it again on this particular video, I was convicted of receiving stolen property in Bucks County Pennsylvania in 1985 when I was 19 years old and sentenced to two years probation. In 1987, when my probation was about to expire, I asked my Bucks County Pennsylvania probation officer if I could own a gun as I had friends who had hunting licenses and liked to shoot guns. He told me yes. I said that there's a form I have to sign (ATF Form 4473 - I didn't know the name then or whether it was state or federal. This is 1987, an era before the Internet and information was not as easy to find as it is today). He said that since I wasn't convicted of a violent crime I could purchase and own a gun. Pennsylvania at the time required a record of the sale to go to the state capitol for handguns and that form clearly stated, "I certify I have not been convicted of a crime of violence in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or any other state" and required a signature. After a 7 day wait I could pick up my handgun. Then the yellow form had to be filled out and the box stating "crime punishable by more than a one year sentence" I simply thought that since I didn't do any time this did not apply and I already had the green light from the state of residence since I was able to pick up my gun. Not trying to absolve guilt here, should have looked into this further as I bought more guns and in 1989 had ATF show up on my doorstep out of the blue. They charged me with felon in possession, lying on the 4473, and confiscated 2 S&W revolvers from me. Turns out one of the gun shops fell under investigation and the 4473s were reviewed for compliance. A few days later I contacted the probation officer about this who did remember me as a former client and he told me to have the agent call him and he'd straighten this out. I did and never heard back from him. My attorney who defended me in the 1985 case was shocked to hear I was arrested for simply having a gun since I was convicted of a nonviolent offense. He, too, only was aware of existing state law. In 1991 I was convicted in federal court in Philadelphia of false statements in connection with the acquisition of a firearm and felon in possession (2 counts each), sentenced to 5 years federal probation, and told I could never own a gun again. 33 years post federal conviction I am now 58 years old and hope to have a chance at 2A since this looks like where the Supreme Court is headed with prohibited persons under 18 USC 922 g(1).
That's fucked. Sorry to hear about your bad luck and another case in which the feds abused their power and made up rules.
Your probation officer gave you crap advice. Sure, it was okay for Pennsylvania law, but The Feds are a different jurisdiction, with different laws. For example, Felons have gun rights in Vermont, but The Feds can come in, and arrest every single one in possession of a gun.
I apologise to you as a U.S. citizen for what happened to you.
Your story is different than mine?
But similar.
We gave to rly stand hard n firm on these issues.
What I've learned from this is never take the advice of a paralegal. If and when SCOTUS rules in favor of this I will get certified documentation from the government itself about my eligibility. @@Oliver0200
How do you eat an Elephant?
One bite at a time.
That's what is going on with our God given Constitutional Rights in America.
And four more years of biden and the Elephant ( our rights, and freedom ) will be gone !
God didn't give you your rights . credit where credit is due our US Armed forces did past and present. God has done enough good he doesn't need you to credit him for something Our military fought and bled for . just my opinion but if it was a God given right then the world would have them not just America .
@@RomanGary-q5i
Are you an American citizen?
Please read the first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence.
I'm just a messenger friend.
God bless you.
@@RomanGary-q5i Do you not think the rest of the world would or does have them in lieu of government or lack thereof. International governments are why some citizens don't have them worldwide. In lack of government any person would own whatever level of force multiplication they wanted. So yes it is a GOD given right
Along with the whole nation.
He can't have a pistol, but he CAN have the codes to our nuclear arsenal.
Non violent crimes shouldn’t result into guns being taken away.
We have a Bill of Rights
Not a Bill of Privileges
A Right cannot be taken or lost.
A Privilege can.
Shall Not Be Infringed does not have an * next to it.
The founders were considered violent Terrorists, Murderers and Thieves by their own government.
They went to war with their own government when they tried to take firearms from them…(Lexington and Concord… Shot heard round the world)
Why would they let the government take firearms from any Americans because the government thinks they are dangerous?
@@Fragger89hell yeah give the pedophiles guns
Like come on your making us look bad
9th Circuit Court just said it is unconstitutional
@@Fragger89 idk man it's pretty logical to take away say a serial murderers rights to guns
Stop saying "should".
Are we losing our water well rights in Washington state?
Idaho is have the same water problem.
It depends on your deed. Some deeds talk about water rights that not even the government can take away.
Yes 😞
I've lived in two different mobile home parks around Olympia that had a shared well are they trying to shut them down it's been almost 18 years sense I lived there.
Washington state has gone nuts. Many years ago I thought it would be a wonderful place to live, not any more.
NJ is likely going to pull the liquor licenses of his 3 golf clubs in the near future. Conviction is automatic revocation of a liquor license in the state.
It’s only automatic, as I remember, for certain types of convictions … so AG Platkin is trying to stretch those types of convictions to add the charges from NY case.
Didn't trump step down from his businesses when he became president?
It's not like he's a sole proprietor or anything they can't take anything from his business , businesses is an entity of itself.
I doubt he is the liquor license holder for those locations. Prior to getting elected in 2016 he transfered businesses to his kids.
Not while under appeal. A conviction does not stand while under appeal!
If the Supreme Court adheres to the test in Bruen, they have to rule in favor of Rahimi. There was no tradition of taking away rights from those with domestic violence restraining orders. In fact "domestic violence restraining orders" didn't even exist in the founding era.
You can’t lose rights you loose privileges.
Lose?
All rights are privileges when the powerful (government or otherwise) have a monopoly on violence.
@@ivandog-o1757hopefully unintentional autocorrect by a dumb smart phone?
How is having guns a privilege? We didn't come here to America just to carve out a spot for the gov't to tell us what we can and can't do.
@@cooltraineraaron4618 how can the government take away your god given rights I thought only benefits and privileges could be taken away from us for bad behavior but not our god given rights, so we don’t have rights we have privileges. Isn’t it obvious ?
Rights are Not Forefitted - Never Give Up Your Rights...
All the worlds a stage! F em!!
RUSH
@@NoneYaBiz5 ...performers and portrayers..
Hey President Trump, 34 felony convictions you didn,t deserve! I got 72 felony convictions and didn,t deserve any of them. I was guilty of a non-violent misd. BUT the commonwealth didn,t see it that way! I know how you feel, believe me! I Lost my license, gun rights, and a $100K legal gun collection! Jeff Dusti Shirley,Ma.
lol pwned
@@nder I,m glad you think it,s funny! 1 of the rifles they stole I was offered $50K for it back in 1996! I,m glad you think it,s funny! Jeff D.
Mr bumpstock law and Redflag law Karma
I was charged with SBR (different than bumpstock obviously but same agency rulemaking process) after a red flag warrant. It's a mess here in FL. Luckily charges dropped because of injunction but they incinerated my brace anyway.
What about the 9th Circuit Court ruling non-violent felons do not lose gun rights, especially in the face of Bruen.?
We're still waiting for Rahimi, which will reinforce the "no gun for felons"!!
@@Sarah-im3lp Thanks for the update!
@@Sarah-im3lp it damn straight better not.
They wanna tango w me?
lol...
I think they would come to regret it.
I fight hard.
The judge hasn't signed a judgment yet, he's not even technically a convicted felon.
WHERE IS THE SUPREME COURT WHEN AMERICA NEEDS THEM .
Peacefully sleeping just like congress!!!!!!!
Worrying about social engineering
Accepting and enjoying free vacations and opening their gifts.
Cashing checks from China
They have been consistently reinforcing the Second Amendment (e.g., the Bruen ruling), so I think they may eventually rule that someone convicted of a non-violent felony cannot be deprived of his 2nd Amendment rights.
Going to try to make this brief. In my twenties I was convicted of criminal possession of a weapon. Fast forward I obtained my civil rights back. I was able to purchase handguns in Pa. The key is this, you have to have a clean record for 10yrs after your conviction. You must apply to get your civil rights back. Furthermore just to be sure I went out and got a UPIN# from the feds. So far so good, I’ve been purchasing firearms with no problems. To all felons, after your conviction and being crime free for 10yrs straight, go and get your civil rights back! This is the key! You have to file that paperwork getting your civil rights back. Some states it happens automatically. Most states there is a process. Hopes this helps.
In federal cases civil rights can be restored by the state but the gun rights can only be restored by the Feds and as far as I know, Feds aren't restoring period. Trump is lucky because he had a state case and he can get both his civil and gun rights back.
How do you apply to get your rights back? I have not seen that anywhere.
It doesn't work like that in every state. I completed my sentence in 1995, served 10 months in prison. My civil rights were restored in 2005, and I still don't have my gun rights. My governor in Florida is a douchebag and recently denied me a hearing in 2022. So to sum it up, my civil rights were restored in 2005 and have been eligible to have my gun rights restored since 2003, yet I still can't own a firearm.
@@dummycratnation2993 In Virginia having your civil rights restored and even a simple pardon doesn't give your firearm rights back.The only way in most states that I know you have to petition the court you were convicted in for your firearm rights. You cannot be on supervised or unsupervised probation.
@@jmoneyband13st75 In Virginia, You must ask the Governor to reinstate Your Civil Rights, Then get a Circuit Court Judge where You Live to Restore Your 2A Rights. As long as it's Not a Violent Felony Conviction You Are Good 👍
Rights can't be taken away. It is a violation of rights,
Rights cannot be lost
Right to bear is a scam, i asked for some help last week. Have yet to receieve any response or help with an attorney still
Explain..more.
@@sedg03 I already got it figured out. I went out of my way to get my attorney. This right to bear thing is an absolute waste of your money, scam
When Trump is President again can he pardoned himself to get his arms back ..??? ❤
I'd settle for Trump suspending the GCA 1968 after he gets reelected, I'd even be ok with sunset and grandfathering provisions.
Not how it works, he can have his justice dept not prosecute those "crimes" but congress has to repeal laws.
Nov. 5th. 173,706 gun owners and hunters in WA state are not registered to vote. We need all hands-on deck. Good vid.
what is it you want that you dont already have?
“Behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation” - 2 Corinthians 6:2
Please don't wait, do it now!❤
I don't care what type of felling you are. If you serve your time, if you paid your finds, if you stay out of trouble, every human has the right to protect himself or herself. Period.
So you tell me if there's a felon with a 🔫 in a ma$$ $hooting you don't want him to defend everyone in a crowd included himself?
You are telling me an felon doesn't have the right to protect his family? People with felon that do not want to do the right thing do not buy that guns legally. Non-violent or valent felons Can I have all rights back but they're gun rights? That tells you're right there the law may changing. Steve Harvey is a felon is anybody worried about him committing crimes with a gun? He is one of many that people will consider a outstanding citizen now.
In a round about way this could be a good thing. Now that this is happening to him, it's in his wheelhouse and he will hopefully make changes that are long overdue.
the ninth circus court in CA ( of all places) recently ruled that a blanket prohibition on convicted felons possessing firearms violates their Second Amendment rights, at least when it comes to nonviolent offenders who served out their sentence.
This is a long standing feud between Trump and corruptocrats in NYC. Other states may begin to question whether they will continue reciprocity with New York state and recognize this unconstitutional authority, although the feds will continue to fiercely defend it. New York is one of 50 states, if they want to behave like Bolsheviks then they should exist in isolation. There are a lot of fine people in NY, they need to get active and take back their rights.
Dad threw Hunter under the bus at an interesting time.. I smell something nefarious brewing on the 2a front.
Whoever smelt it dealt it.
He already said he wouldn’t pardon him.
LOL! Another MAGA conspiracy theory?? What would MAGA do without them!!??
As soon as the election is over, he is getting pardoned. This is a scheme to try and show the justice system is "fair" before the election
That is NWO game plan...
NO GUN INVOLVED IN THE CHARGE THEY CAN'T NAME ......
Technically since his charges are State Level and not federal, if New York has an expungement process he could get them back through that. However, I believe 922(g) is unconstitutional. 100% unconstitutional!
Hopefully Donald Trump has become "educated" on the value of an individuals 2nd Amendment rights and how quickly the Left will infringe on those said Constitutional rights.
Can not remove his Right, Federal appeals court ruled last year 2023! 3rd U.S. Circuit Court Philadelphia
MANY misdemeanor charges also make you prohibited BTW.
THANK YOU KIRK, LOVE YOUR PODCAST!!! WE MUST KEEP FIGHTING AND VIGOROUSLY UNTIL OUR FULL 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS ARE NO LONGER BEING ATTACKED. WE HAVE A MONUMENTAL FIGHT AHEAD!!!!
What you should talk about is the fact that there were 2-3 attorneys on the Trump trial and still voted for a conviction.
I think abt that...;(
How does New York ruling affect him when he's at Florida residence? He can't possess fire arms in New York only or anywhere he lives??
As per Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.
All of our Founding Fathers wer very violent and dangerous prior felons. So under what kind of logic does anyone believe that they would have supported "prohibited person" laws, which fly in the face of the prohibitions on Bills of Attainder
articulated. On talking abt that.
NFL **EXCELLENT** point.
Scotus lurks n talks on the e.sites.
Talk that up..more..pls ??
“We must reject the idea that every time a law is broken, society is guilty rather than the law breaker”. It’s time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for their actions. - Ronald Reagan
This country has certainly dumbed down since I grew up in the 1950's.
Implying that the government isn't at fault for infringing on your natural born rights by enforcing bogus laws, and even rules that never passed through the judiciary system?
He isn't losing anything friend. We aren't losing anything, they will be the ones losing, everything.
Just like everyone thought from the beginning, if they can do it to him they can do it to everyone.
please he's getting treated like a king
Amy Barrett argued just such a case before she was made a SCOTUS justice. This is a real issue for our times
she's a garbage person
Can we just think about how insane it is that this is happening to a President of the United States. Like..... What the fu....
Commies gonna commie
its not insane. its called rule of law - why would you want any politician to be immune from criminal penalities?
@@robi6317 🤣 clearly, you have no clue what he was accused of, how he was accused of it, the law itself, the standard punishment for that law, the background of the judge..... You just have no clue what so ever and yet you're commenting like you have an opinion.
You're the problem. Truly. Your ignorance is why this country is failing
Ah the take gun's first worry about due process later the same guy that put a ban on bump stocks.
The irony 😂😂😂
People will still worship their orange God. His supporters aren't the smartest bunch.
It seems some people can remember things. I appreciate you guys for that.
The bump stocks were dumb to begin with
Your not the brightest, that's why your a democrat.
If a so-called "felon" is safe enough to release from prison, then he's safe enough to own a personal protection device.
So does that apply to people convicted of murder or even multiple murders , , child molesters , rapist or people with a history of violent acts ? Tell me how you believe that child molesters or those convicted of killing kids deserve the right to own or carry a firearm because they are letting people out of prison or out on multiple bonds for violent crimes everyday , they are not going to keep them in prison so get that out of your mind .
@@joejohnson4183 where in the 2A does it say only law abiding people can own firearms? "The People" have the right, and it "shall not be infringed".
@@joejohnson4183 IF IT IS NOT A PUNISHMENT HANDED DOWN BY THE COURTS THEN EVEN THE WORST FELON HAS THE RIGHT TO PROTECT THEMSELVES. Self protection should be a human right regardless of the means in which you do it. Whether it's owning a gun or a plethora of knives, swords, or big ass a pointy stick.
@@joejohnson4183 Government incompetence (or outright malfeasance in the case of some of the leftists) should never be used as an excuse to deprive citizens of their rights. Yes the system is broken but the solution is to fix the system (and yes I realize that isn't going to happen in the current political climate), attempting to use the restriction of individual rights to cover for government ineptitude and/or misconduct is at best putting a band-aid on a hemorrhage, at the end of the day the "truly dangerous criminals" (like the ones you listed above) are unlikely to comply anyhow and such actions only hurt those who are little to no danger to society and just want to be able to protect themselves as anyone else would.
@@joejohnson4183 Hey genius, if you have been arrested, convicted and served your time in jail and have been released then YES you deserve your gun rights back. If you don't like that then change the MINIMUM SENTENCES that are imposed.
Trump is a Florida Resident, DeSantis can give him 10 permits if Florida still requires such things.
Florida doesn't require a gun permit.
Awesome, same here no permit to carry any way you want to.
Florida can't and won't. New York will have to restore his rights. Because the stripping is federal.
I believe this is federal.
The stripping of firearms authority is federal and can only be overturned if New York restores his gun rights
"Losing his gun RIGHTS"???? HAHAHAHAHA
Please, please tell me what other RIGHT requires an APPLICATION, BACKGROUND CHECK, and FEE PAYMENT in order to be exercised?? I'll be patiently waiting...
And Hunter, guilty on all charges
Is the verdict out?
@vicdiaz5180 yeah, it's out, Guilty
@@vicdiaz5180yup
And the entire thing was unconstitutional
But I bet he won't spend any time in prison and/or jail he'll get off scot free Daddy will see to it.
Hes never committed a crime with a gun so they are OVERSTEPPING BY FAR
They want him GONE as in six feet under.
They're even talking about taking away S S protection.
That would leave him TOTALLY exposed.
The HATE is displayed in HUGE neon letters.............. he needs all the protection he can get.
It's not the crime, it's the felony charge. Any felony, removes your right to bear arms and vote.
@@faust_fpvthey weren't felonies, they were misdemeanors
He's just committed every other crime in the book!!
@@trollhunter6934 irrelevant; you don't win when the opposition creates the rules.
Unconstitutional.
Ok here is an idea for you because every lawyer conveniently leaves this part out when they discuss felon in possession of firearms. Have you read the definition of firearm in the 18 USC 921/922 garbage? THEY ARE NOT DISARMING VIOLET FELONS FROM ALL GUNS, JUST SOME. It is absolutely legal for a violent felon to buy and possess all types of guns. All of you bozos think that felons were "striped of their 2A" guarantees but they are not. You can't strip someone of a Natural Right. Everyday prisons all across America permit prisoners to bear arms. They use all sorts of tools that can be used to commit evil acts. Once those prisoners complete their sentence, they can go buy all sorts of tools and cooking devices like pressure cookers or buy a sawed off 10-gauge sidelock shotgun. Can you STOP REPEATING THE LIE ABOUT FELONS LOOSING OR BEING STRIPED OF THEIR 2A.? If they can buy a .58 caliber Enfield or a Cannon, then they should be able to buy any firearm on the market. Here is the definition that yall always forget about.
(16)The term “antique firearm” means-
(A)any firearm (including any firearm with a matchlock, flintlock, percussion cap, or similar type of ignition system) manufactured in or before 1898; or
(B)any replica of any firearm described in subparagraph (A) if such replica-
(i)is not designed or redesigned for using rimfire or conventional centerfire fixed ammunition, or
(ii)uses rimfire or conventional centerfire fixed ammunition which is no longer manufactured in the United States and which is not readily available in the ordinary channels of commercial trade; or
(C)any muzzle loading rifle, muzzle loading shotgun, or muzzle loading pistol, which is designed to use black powder, or a black powder substitute, and which cannot use fixed ammunition. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term “antique firearm” shall not include any weapon which incorporates a firearm frame or receiver, any firearm which is converted into a muzzle loading weapon, or any muzzle loading weapon which can be readily converted to fire fixed ammunition by replacing the barrel, bolt, breechblock, or any combination thereof.
We should congratulate Donald Trump on being the only person to be convicted of any crime in New York in 2024! Trump 2024
ITS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT should not matter what crime they did in the past. If they have to pay taxes then the y should have all right return back to them. they should be able to own guns to protect their self or family's. they should be able to hunt for food I TS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT .
His so called crime has nothing to do with a gun.
And also, his so called crime wasn’t a crime until the laws were changed to make it a crime for him…
Can't let Counter-Revolutionaries arm themselves.
They will threaten the Revolution Comrade.
@@hercflyer Right anyone remember Former President Clinton and his 800,000 dollar hush money payment!
Donald trump is a FLORIDA resident so he can give up his NEW YORK firearms license and new york can take his guns if they are in Florida and he gave them to one of his sons ! LOLOLO
What was/is the constitutionality in assuming the “US Codes” could define the parameters of the Constitution?
A LONE WOLF STANDS STRONGER EVEN WHEN ALONE. SCOTUS HAS RULED that OWNERSHIP of FIREARMS from a NON-VIOLENT FELON IS CONSTITUTIONAL.
I had a dui going to get diapers 8+ years ago. Earlier that day i was hunting and forgot my firearms in the car. 2 misdemeanors together= felony. Now i can't protect my 4 kids or go hunting. Sober 5+ years.
As a fellow Washingtonian, I would absolutely watch your 3 hr video covering the whole Trump mess. Make it a live stream with super chats and you'll make more money. I usually don't watch things live because I'm too busy, and I usually watch them afterwards at my leisure.
He’s not convicted until judgement is entered by the Court AND is sentenced to Felony time (more than a year’s custody).
Rahimi wont lose, but it will be found on a very, very narrow base line, where due process will have to be implemented and in a very certain way. But rahimi won't lose, there are many instances where the law has protected the rights of known criminals in history, including al capone, and others...if the scotus bends and finds against rahimi because of his criminal background and the use of his rights to commit crimes then we will enter a legal dark ages and everything past rahimi will be a technocracy and all of your analysis going foward will be moot because we will have no rule of law or rights to back us up on anything. It would set the precedent where the left can bring known criminals to court and say, hey look, he commited a crime because he has rights and we must be able to take those rights away without due process in order to save the public, which would be directly contradictory to the bruen decision as well as just insane.
I'm sure you probably regrets pissing off a whole lot of gun owners when he started doing those executive orders with the ATF.🙄
Well you don't bother voting.
@@junicohen7918 your stupid
Can’t he give them to his son?
He can’t cary a gun but he can cary the nuclear football with a trigger that unleashes hell on earth of nuclear strikes. Nahhhhh…… clear double standard.
No historical precedence of any gun regulations. - incarceration
Thank you sir.
Please do the 3 hour video because lots of people are saying stuff but I haven't heard a single person explain what they are talking about specifically. "Too much to talk about" is a cop-out.
the right to arm bears
Yogi and Boo-Boo will turn into gun collectors! 😅
Trump and Hunter are potentially providing Rocket Fuel for proper Bruen/Heller handling of #2A cases. 😉
Something else to remember: The term 'dangerousness' is vague, and it has been long settled law that the Congress (state or federal) cannot name those whom are to be considered 'dangerous' and apply different law to them. They may imprison, they may execute the offender, but they cannot put them under separate law outside of the sentence. The congress cannot declare an individual or group dangerous and by that legislative finding usurp the powers of the court, or exceed the duration of the imprisonable sentence.
"To say that the persons who will be affected by it have previously forfeited that right, and that, therefore, nothing is taken away from them, is a begging of the question. How do we know who are the persons in this situation? If it be answered, this is the mode taken to ascertain it -- the objection returns -- 'tis an improper mode, because it puts the most essential interests of the citizen upon a worse footing than we should be willing to tolerate where inferior interests were concerned, and because, to elude the treaty, it substitutes for the established and legal mode of investigating crimes and inflicting forfeitures, one that is unknown to the Constitution, and repugnant to the genius of our law."-- Cummings v. Missouri
Exactly true.
Time to instill new guards boys and girls.
What a mess.
Good Afternoon from Corrupt Illinois. Thanks for the update.
Perhaps you can do a video on 2A rights of spouses of non-violent felons being compromised because having a firearm in the marital home could cause the felon to get arrested.
Jose. Ditto being in WH w daddy because secret service ALWAYS carry? And there are arsenalsvdtored n stashed all over in WH.
So hunter n biden are screwed.
I have never seen in the 2nd amendment an exception for a felon. The funny thing is that a felon or felonies are mentioned in 3 other places in the constitution.
That's because it says "...shall not be infringed upon."
Try reading the rest of the constitution
@nichmaus8705 A felon or felonies is mentioned three times in the constitution but not as a exception to the 2nd amendment.
It isn't a Felon
It is a Counter-Revolutionary,
And to They/Them that is WORSE!
I never saw a "right" to own AK47s or AR15s!!
BECAUSE ITS GOING TO BE A NATIONWIDE PARDON FACT,