Enthalpy of Reaction

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 127

  • @nicolefurze688
    @nicolefurze688 9 років тому +96

    some people say that teachers teach because they cannot do. that is a complete lie. teaching is an art and a gift. this man in the video has that gift and gives his art generously. most of my professors in college do not possess this gift of teaching because they are not aware that teaching is something outside of just being able to do what it is they "teach". and thus, they do not deserve the money i spend on tuition, but mr. anderson does.

    • @vog-
      @vog- 4 роки тому +2

      Very true, only a few teachers I’ve had could actually teach in such a way

  • @samnoname2010
    @samnoname2010 10 років тому +272

    If I ever manage to get a PHD I'm giving you half of it

    • @912sonic
      @912sonic 7 років тому +8

      LOOOOL

    • @Z3ROWOLFHD
      @Z3ROWOLFHD 6 років тому +26

      u get that phd bro?

    • @avira1d
      @avira1d 5 років тому +10

      Did you get the PHD???

    • @cocoarecords
      @cocoarecords 5 років тому

      samnoname2010 he dropped out

    • @jenspetter1454
      @jenspetter1454 5 років тому +1

      ?? so did you give half of it?

  • @Angie-no7qx
    @Angie-no7qx 3 роки тому +3

    Did not want to keep asking my teacher for help on this since she got annoyed so I went to this video and saved me thanks

  • @zenalc536
    @zenalc536 9 років тому +54

    you are a very good teacher. you deserve 1 million more subscribers .

  • @GM-cz9sq
    @GM-cz9sq 7 років тому +2

    You explained this in 8 minutes and managed to help me understand this better than my Chemistry professor did in an entire lecture period!

    • @blue-wing2071
      @blue-wing2071 7 років тому +1

      and i take this in grade 12 :(

    • @francisgregoryku1689
      @francisgregoryku1689 7 років тому +1

      Warlock i take this in gr11 lol taking a test about this tom. I guess senior high is on par with 1st -2nd yr college in some aspects

  • @alyssahoffman8855
    @alyssahoffman8855 8 років тому +184

    I like this more than Khan Academy

  • @Kenzo_254
    @Kenzo_254 2 роки тому +3

    You are a really great teacher. I don't take it for granted. Respect.

  • @liammarie1447
    @liammarie1447 5 років тому +17

    I literally shed a tear because of this 😂 thank you

  • @tanyay1073
    @tanyay1073 8 років тому +10

    Thanks for making chemistry a little more bearable! 😂👍🏼

  • @Noellexafael
    @Noellexafael 6 років тому +1

    And u just saved me from my teacher thanks a million haha, i have been struggling to remember that but the way you put things into perspective is really helpful.

  • @zanahmed9343
    @zanahmed9343 4 роки тому +3

    thanks bozeman i got a 200 on my ap bio test because there was a 100 point bonus.

  • @thierrytrevorbusinge8186
    @thierrytrevorbusinge8186 4 роки тому

    "The Bozeman effect" has had a very good impact on me....THANK YOU A LOT

  • @flieu9342
    @flieu9342 3 роки тому +1

    I think it’s very essential to define the unit of the Enthalpy of Reaction. What does the per mol stand for? Without discussing the concept of the Extent of Reaction, you will never truly understand the Enthalpy of Reaction, and why the Enthalpy of Reaction changes every time you manipulate your reactions.
    Per mol means per mole reaction!

  • @winterhuff1338
    @winterhuff1338 3 роки тому +1

    This helped me so much . I’ve been watching a bunch of videos on this but I couldn’t understand them .i understand this very much .thank you

  • @reindeerchai1286
    @reindeerchai1286 2 роки тому

    I want to hug this man rn

  • @hobihobi1563
    @hobihobi1563 6 років тому +1

    i literally got a revelation watching this... thank you so much

  • @ComandaKronikk
    @ComandaKronikk 7 років тому +8

    when bozeman times'd that 2O by half i was like WHAT IS THIS BLACK MAGIC

  • @riddhivasu.studies
    @riddhivasu.studies Рік тому +1

    Thermodynamics is SUPER INTERESTING, but at the same time, sometimes kind of hectic to deal with 😂

  • @rxthezh
    @rxthezh 5 років тому

    Just to point out I think the reaction in yellow at 4:44 should be o2(g) instead of o2(s)

  • @HenriFaust
    @HenriFaust Рік тому

    The original dynamite was made from diatomaceous earth, and this is still the major component of the recipe. Several binding and stabilizing agents were later added to improve stability and slow the rate at which the nitroglycerin would seep out of the sticks and pool in the container. This is why dynamite must be turned regularly during long-term storage, or else it may spontaneously blow up. Dynamite sticks are wrapped in wax paper because the surface of each stick is always moist with seeping nitroglycerin.
    Dynamite is still used commonly by civilian farmers in the USA, so you may encounter some lying around somewhere. Old dynamite is extremely unstable without the proper maintenance procedures. Do not touch abandoned dynamite, call the bomb squad instead.

  • @helishah6903
    @helishah6903 5 років тому

    Thank you Mr. Anderson

  • @andrewchen861
    @andrewchen861 8 місяців тому

    hi i love you mr anderson thanks for saving my grade

  • @mquartz7547
    @mquartz7547 10 років тому +1

    Great explanation, very helpful! Thank you so much for all of your videos!

  • @maryshabo6261
    @maryshabo6261 5 років тому +1

    It was literally perfect keep going ❤️

  • @AyoItzMat
    @AyoItzMat 11 років тому

    Excellent video, very concise.

  • @avira1d
    @avira1d 5 років тому

    Sir, I am thankful for you.

  • @jacobh1995
    @jacobh1995 9 років тому +1

    Thanks Mr. Bozeman

  • @mcnagi4246
    @mcnagi4246 7 місяців тому

    Yes, thank you. That was really helpful!

  • @rahulsurwase6627
    @rahulsurwase6627 3 роки тому

    Thanks mr Anderson

  • @jokroast6912
    @jokroast6912 5 років тому

    I have never seen these fraction superscripts before and they are hurting my brain.

  • @tinashemuza8671
    @tinashemuza8671 6 років тому

    on 5:12 you made a mistake on the target reaction, which has oxygen as a solid. secondly i didnt find it clear how you got the half oxygen on the left side while it was on the right. otherwise the video was awesome

  • @m000mbku2
    @m000mbku2 9 років тому

    in the first problem, why is the oxygen a solid? why doesnt the arrow direction change when you reverse the reaction?

  • @nikan4now
    @nikan4now 4 роки тому +1

    Great video. Can you please answer my question? With these diagrams, do they show enthalpy or purely potential chemical energy? My confusion arises from the following: In an exothermic reaction, we know that chemical potential energy decreases and for conservation of energy to hold, kinetic energy should rise (product molecules moving faster). But if we said enthalpy decreases there will be a contradiction because enthalpy is internal energy + PV (assuming PV change is zero) , internal energy ITSELF contains kinetic energy of the molecules, so how could overall enthalpy decrease (KE increases and potential energy decreases by the same amount)

  • @oogalook
    @oogalook 10 років тому

    Thanks for the great video! Very helpful.

  • @anaslahrichi
    @anaslahrichi 11 років тому +1

    Is enthalpy related to entropy ? Does enthalpy fit in some thermodynamic principle ?

    • @Bozemanscience1
      @Bozemanscience1  11 років тому +9

      Enthalpy and entropy are related but they are not the same thing. I am currently working on an entropy video.

    • @chrysik.5755
      @chrysik.5755 9 років тому

      anas lahrichi yes they are related through the 2nd therm. law: δq(rev)=TdS.
      If you try for any to states to go (reversibly and under constant pressure): then you end with dU=Tds-pdV. (But because p,V,S, T are all quantities that are functions of states that's why you can use it generally between any 2 states!)
      Now, using that ENTHALPY can be written: H=U+pV so dH=dU+d(pV)=TdS + VdP. (equation relating enthalpy and entropy) So H is a function of S and p!! Again only state functions!! And of course after this you can take the corresponding derivatives.... Saying dH/dS at constant p is Temperature.

  • @suffixable
    @suffixable 11 років тому

    Can i know what's the difference between enthalpy of bond and enthalpy of heat of formation.
    Thank you

  • @13eun
    @13eun 10 років тому

    Thank you for great video!

  • @meernahro7164
    @meernahro7164 9 років тому

    extremely helpful 😀 keep up the good work

  • @marijngoes6580
    @marijngoes6580 11 років тому

    check your vid around 2m50. your diagram goes wrong for changing the reaction around (invert products and reactants). I think it need correction

  • @rachelmarie4008
    @rachelmarie4008 4 роки тому

    Min 6:05 made me subscribe!

  • @jessecruz6241
    @jessecruz6241 9 років тому

    I love your videos sir! Thank u soo much!

  • @googleone9209
    @googleone9209 9 років тому

    Wonderful! Very intuitive! Than you

  • @JANxKylie
    @JANxKylie 11 років тому

    Thanks for that. ive had a 3hrs chem class on that and i dint understand anything. thanks..
    can u make a video on the cycle and how u can figue stuff out of that please?

  • @whitewolfie
    @whitewolfie 5 років тому

    Thanks! It was really helpful!

  • @santino4486
    @santino4486 7 років тому

    video was helpful, could you explain to me what emthalpy fusion is ?

  • @divneet3474
    @divneet3474 9 років тому

    But isnt the literal meaning of enthalpy that the whole process occurs at constant temperature and pressure?

  • @janaxy6024
    @janaxy6024 7 років тому

    love this guy

  • @Sialkotivloggers
    @Sialkotivloggers 7 років тому

    sir I got your all points but not in few seconds.sir really your all videos are great .I am from Punjab and not understanding English that's why.

  • @eskilingemann1783
    @eskilingemann1783 10 років тому

    This was very helpful, thanks:)

  • @CarineFrisch
    @CarineFrisch 7 років тому

    We can't see the target equation because of the transcript at the bottom of the screen.

  • @AchikaRozkuro
    @AchikaRozkuro 11 років тому +3

    I always had a hard time about this. Even after received it like 3 times in schools!!
    Thanks a lot!!!! >w

  • @zerok7038
    @zerok7038 10 років тому

    Hello. Greetings from Austria.
    I have only one complain. Namely sometimes subtitle cover some of your writings.
    I guess it was added afterwards...

  • @danmadefurniture
    @danmadefurniture 4 роки тому

    thankyou sir , it was quite helpful

  • @kareem9102
    @kareem9102 10 років тому

    very nice. Amazing explanation.

  • @marijngoes6580
    @marijngoes6580 11 років тому

    Also you made a tiny mistake with the pahse symbol of oxygen. it is not solid, it is a gas

  • @leensh752
    @leensh752 3 роки тому

    Wow. He just explained the whole thing at 1:16 while my tr spent 2 periods to say that.

  • @soumiakh7931
    @soumiakh7931 5 років тому

    Thank y so much 💞💞💞

  • @waffleslmao8356
    @waffleslmao8356 3 роки тому

    0:52

  • @sciencenerd7639
    @sciencenerd7639 3 роки тому

    very nice

  • @adryanvalhallatier5259
    @adryanvalhallatier5259 6 років тому

    Why is the first target of oxygen is solid?

  • @praveendintakurthi5869
    @praveendintakurthi5869 4 роки тому

    Thanks a lot sir

  • @sungminpark8467
    @sungminpark8467 10 років тому

    thank you so much!! I can understand now!

  • @jurassicdocs
    @jurassicdocs 3 роки тому

    Thanks a lot

  • @datkarysbergenov2287
    @datkarysbergenov2287 10 років тому

    thanks for explanation

  • @philippebouchard9093
    @philippebouchard9093 9 років тому

    Little mistake during the 4th minute. The target should be O2 (g) and not O2 (s)
    Very good video however. Thanks a lot

  • @shadowfiend4436
    @shadowfiend4436 10 років тому +19

    ha gonna get that F tomorrow

  • @mandradep97
    @mandradep97 10 років тому

    THANK YOU!

  • @francisgregoryku1689
    @francisgregoryku1689 7 років тому

    SO GOOD

  • @joannamarquez1925
    @joannamarquez1925 10 років тому +1

    THIS WAS AMAZING haha (:

  • @KDawgHere
    @KDawgHere 10 років тому +1

    Life saver

  • @stimulantdaimamld2099
    @stimulantdaimamld2099 2 роки тому

    great

  • @valefaraci
    @valefaraci 10 років тому

    Thank you!!!!!!!!

  • @shabnam_sajida
    @shabnam_sajida 5 років тому

    Thanks

  • @Mica_No
    @Mica_No 4 роки тому

    Wow thanks

  • @divneet3474
    @divneet3474 9 років тому

    Awwesooommmmeeeee😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄

  • @Nice69
    @Nice69 11 років тому

    Cool!

  • @karkgames77
    @karkgames77 5 років тому

    👏👏👏

  • @arnolddreamer9667
    @arnolddreamer9667 8 років тому

    Very we'll done. Thanks!

  • @Bluemonkey123
    @Bluemonkey123 8 років тому

    much more useful than the khan

  • @odweyneboardingschool5832
    @odweyneboardingschool5832 4 роки тому

    Teacher give me some calculations

  • @notmasterchief
    @notmasterchief 8 років тому

    not bad

  • @LMk304
    @LMk304 9 років тому

    Thank you so much!

  • @ThePandaBlog
    @ThePandaBlog 9 років тому

    I need the entalpy of cellulose

  • @hindveeyadav5143
    @hindveeyadav5143 9 років тому

    thankssssssssssssssss.

  • @mitshah2162
    @mitshah2162 10 років тому

    Best

  • @jollyjokress3852
    @jollyjokress3852 9 років тому

    best

  • @AGhostsShadow123
    @AGhostsShadow123 6 років тому

    bruh what

  • @Sialkotivloggers
    @Sialkotivloggers 7 років тому

    thanks sir but speak slowly .

  • @ethanxu8013
    @ethanxu8013 9 років тому +1

    The last answer is wrong

  • @ikhlasdrifts7610
    @ikhlasdrifts7610 11 років тому +1

    3rd viewer HAHA :D

  • @waldo7779
    @waldo7779 7 років тому

    Can you go slower.. it takes time to understand.

  • @AyoItzMat
    @AyoItzMat 11 років тому

    Excellent video, very concise.