Galaxy Force II (Arcade vs Sega Genesis) Side by Side Comparison (Arcade vs Mega Drive)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 жов 2024
  • Galaxy Force II Comparison - Mega Drive/ Sega Genesis vs Arcade Sega Y Board Hardware.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 82

  • @vcdecide
    @vcdecide  8 років тому +11

    leave your like, comment, subscribe and share this video :)
    thanks for watching ^_^

  • @stufaman
    @stufaman 8 років тому +14

    I can never get enough of these videos. Great as always.
    The arcade version made my jaw drop back in the day, it still looks great now.
    The Megadrive version played well enough, but there was no way.
    Also a valiant effort was the Master System. Very impressive considering.

  • @Isoquant
    @Isoquant 7 років тому +10

    GFII was a jaw-dropping, sprite scaling tour-de-force in the arcades. Loved the oversized cockpit on hydraulics. The home consoles never stood a chance.

  • @parapoliticos52
    @parapoliticos52 3 роки тому +4

    You can see why video games and arcades became such a big part of young boys life in the 80s.
    7-8 year boys of 1983 were used to seeing older boys playing pacmans and donkey kongs on arcade machines at the local fast food place where they were eating with their parents and by the time they became 12 they were playing games like this, final fight and double dragon and a thousand other amazing games at the arcades.Must have blew their minds.

  • @JoaoGabriel-sv3wm
    @JoaoGabriel-sv3wm 8 років тому +18

    Versão do Mega muito simples! acho que dava pra fazer algo melhor. A versão de arcade é cheia de efeitos de profundidade impressionantes !

  • @RodrigoDigoJunho
    @RodrigoDigoJunho 4 роки тому +7

    Esse Jogo foi um dos precursores do Star Fox ou é impressão minha ? e isso 5 anos antes !

  • @dykodesigns
    @dykodesigns 2 роки тому +4

    It’s an impressive port considering the technical limitations of the Megadrive. Some of the details like the level select screen and high score screen look near identical. Of course, the ingame graphics don’t really compare but it’s still quite impressive considering this is base hardware. It would have been a great candidate for the Mega CD’s scaling chip or even the 32X. Considering Batman Returns’ driving stages on the Mega CD the scaler chip could have been awsome for this game.

    • @liamconverse8950
      @liamconverse8950 5 місяців тому

      Burning force is a similar game with a better port. Panorama Cotton was executed way better too. Night striker was a port of an arcade game like this to the japanese Mega CD and it's pretty awful because it's just about the full arcade game but everything is super low resolution

  • @julhao244
    @julhao244 8 років тому +3

    A versão Arcade se não me engano utilizava 3 processadores MC68000, por isso os gráficos ficaram ligeiramente superior ao do Mega Drive. Me lembro que existem alguns jogos de Arcade da Sega que utilizava o System 16 e tinha uma conversão 100% no console da Sharp (o X-68000), mas eu acho que este eles não converteram.

  • @Ryuujin1078
    @Ryuujin1078 8 років тому +11

    You should do a comparison with the 3DS version!!

  • @ffestudio
    @ffestudio 7 років тому +3

    The Sega Genesis version is obviously simpler than arcade one, BUT please guys pay attention in one detail: is the first game I can remember that did perfect scaling (zoom-in) like SNES with no extra hardware. The planet's tunnel entrance and the boss-core-machine. If they worked better in the tunnels surface and put more characters into it, would be perfect due to Genesis VDP limitation. The music is nearly perfect, one of the best ports ever made.

  • @Ryuujin1078
    @Ryuujin1078 8 років тому +12

    All things considered it's not that bad of a port. Obvious things had to be cut but an honorable effort

    • @rvcklvss
      @rvcklvss 8 років тому

      It is your opinion....but it's just wrong all over :/

    • @Ryuujin1078
      @Ryuujin1078 8 років тому +4

      RVCKLVSS RVCKLVSS thanks for stating the obvious... A lot of arcade to consoles at the time had cuts but tried their best to bring home the experience.

    • @ajsingh4545
      @ajsingh4545 4 роки тому

      You twats even realize how demanding this game is? It's obvious technical part is out of your grasp. This is an ok port but I think the dev could have added little more detail in the levels like Afterburner and Space HArrier 2.

  • @Sinn0100
    @Sinn0100 4 роки тому +1

    Look man, I love the Sega Genesis like no other. It was the machine that turned me into a diehard gamer. I was a filthy casual and the Genesis in 1989 absolutely blew our minds. Unfortunately, it does not have the power to emulate Y Board Super Scaller arcade cab. Games like Galaxy Force and Super Thunderblade should have never been tried on the 16-bit hardware. Even the mighty Neo Geo would have issues running this game.

  • @benjaminbarker6226
    @benjaminbarker6226 3 роки тому +3

    This port was never gonna compete with the arcade but it could have been much better. The re-programmers didn't understand the hardware fully and it was put on a small 4 meg cartridge when it should have come out later and been out on 32 meg cartridge. If someone like Success had done it like the did Panorama Cotton we would have had a much better result.

    • @MrStrangermoon
      @MrStrangermoon 3 роки тому

      ı dont thinky nothing related to meg catridge size. after burner 2 for example not 32meg and good. the problem of galaxy force 2 its need more space levels than ground flat levels bcouse in first space level its kinda similar looking game.

  • @solarflare9078
    @solarflare9078 4 роки тому +6

    "Reprogrammed by CRI"
    Ohhhhhhh no... Arcade wins hands down

  • @GenMD
    @GenMD 4 роки тому +1

    Graphics are obviously better on arcade, but I really prefer the music on Mega Drive. I want a version that mixes both.

  • @brianwalker7771
    @brianwalker7771 8 років тому +11

    The Genesis port is quite decent just not on par with it's arcade counterpart.

  • @Butterstix2014
    @Butterstix2014 3 роки тому +1

    2:04 okay, this is totally some background or sprite scaling being done by the Genesis. Pretty impressive.
    Edit: 3:02 OMG THEY DID IT HERE TOO???

    • @HellTantrumbull
      @HellTantrumbull 2 роки тому +1

      I think that's actually a raster effect being used since the genesis can't do actual scaling with anything due to the lack of hardware needed. with the right programming techniques genesis games can give the illusion of scaling and Panorama Cotton is a really good example of that.

  • @piccolo1906
    @piccolo1906 Рік тому +1

    Looks like they should have put this on Sega CD or 32 x the Mega drive/Genesis can't keep up.

  • @bigkivzero
    @bigkivzero Рік тому

    This was absolutely heartbreaking on the ZX Spectrum

  • @HereForAStorm
    @HereForAStorm 8 років тому +12

    Poor Genesis couldn't do it... the 32X could have like they did with Space Harrier and After Burner though

    • @cwert99
      @cwert99 6 років тому

      Actually it could not. X board was pushing 32x pretty much to its limits

    • @Kapojos
      @Kapojos 6 років тому

      Space harrier is already running slow on the 32x....
      Saturn did GF quite well but also had some slowdown...
      The PS2 version runs without slowdown, but it was pushed to its limits..!!!!
      So no way the 32X could have done it :)

    • @ravengaming4143
      @ravengaming4143 5 років тому

      Sega CD had hardware scaling support, It'd look better there. 32X version would be better of course.

  • @nufiya999
    @nufiya999 8 років тому +1

    A very Ambitious title considering the Megadrive limitations.

    • @consunn2810
      @consunn2810 7 років тому +1

      ben owen Galaxy Force 2 was actually a Y board game,the next generation step up from the x board,so a Genesis port was impossible.The Y was insanely powerful for it's time.

    • @DeskoDev
      @DeskoDev 2 роки тому

      @Benjamin Jagun I don't think you realize just how close the Y Board and Mega Drive sound chips actually are. Or maybe you didn't when you wrote the comment. If they had done a better job it could've sounded VERY close to the arcade, though obviously there'd have to be some sacrifices especially when it comes to PCM samples.

  • @LGDRetrogamer
    @LGDRetrogamer 8 років тому +3

    Mega Drive muito bom, a movimentação achei até mais "verossímil" que a frenética do arcade.

  • @dyscotopia
    @dyscotopia 2 роки тому

    GFII was peak arcade scalar goodness. Trying to port it to anything without hardware scaling was always going to be disappointing.

  • @thehumbleone1983
    @thehumbleone1983 6 років тому +3

    It's not a bad port but the 32x would have been awesome

  • @mrgr8guy257
    @mrgr8guy257 3 роки тому +1

    This would of been good on the Mega CD.

  • @brainimp
    @brainimp 7 років тому +2

    Y boards fake 3D was awesome for the time

  • @djordje2095
    @djordje2095 2 роки тому

    I wish to play 3D remake of this.

  • @lzcmatiasmobile
    @lzcmatiasmobile 5 років тому +2

    Claro que o arcade é melhor, mas o Mega Drive está de parabens aqui.

  • @jacobspowell4416
    @jacobspowell4416 3 роки тому

    I like both of them

  • @TiagoxInside
    @TiagoxInside 4 роки тому

    No chances for Genesis port!
    Sega Y Board Main CPU: 3× MC68000 @ 12.5 MHz

  • @tetsuokenpachi
    @tetsuokenpachi 8 років тому +6

    So slow on Genesis... and most of the time, I'm not getting sense of depth which makes the game absolutely unplayable for me. These games are based on scalings... so, in fact, I believe saying it's a bad port is wrong. The genesis just couldn't do any better.

    • @vcdecide
      @vcdecide  8 років тому +2

      NEXT VIDEO: Star Fox vs ??????? xD YOU DECIDE, COMMENT

    • @SalDOWN
      @SalDOWN 8 років тому

      Star Fox Assault vs Star Fox 0

    • @MegaCallum10
      @MegaCallum10 8 років тому

      vs Guardian on cd32 :3

    • @SalDOWN
      @SalDOWN 8 років тому

      Or Star Fox vs Star Fox 2 :-)

    • @tetsuokenpachi
      @tetsuokenpachi 8 років тому

      VS Sylpheed on Sega CD.

  • @raphaeldiasbarcellos5652
    @raphaeldiasbarcellos5652 3 роки тому

    Que maldade essa comparação!

  • @onizuka4534
    @onizuka4534 7 років тому +4

    on arcade this game looks magnifisent. Why they try port it on a such weak hardware like GENESIS? It cant handle it even in theory.

  • @aryinc
    @aryinc 8 років тому +2

    sega should have skipped this idea together with the sega cd and saved up for the 32x wich was underutilized.

    • @paoloretrogamer
      @paoloretrogamer 6 років тому

      Why?

    • @DanielAyy
      @DanielAyy 5 років тому +3

      Or just skip the 32x and focus on Saturn

    • @Juanknes
      @Juanknes 5 років тому

      @@DanielAyy +1

    • @DanielAyy
      @DanielAyy 5 років тому

      @@Juanknes I think the Sega CD was alright. It was certainly more important than the 32x. I wish the 32x was never made, it really didn't have much to bring to the table.

  • @davidvfx
    @davidvfx 3 роки тому

    4 megasbits cartrige (0.5 megabytes) 😱😳🤯

  • @KRAFTWERK2K6
    @KRAFTWERK2K6 6 років тому +1

    ah well… the Mega Drive version is still better than the Commodore 64 port. :O

  • @RodrigoMeazzi
    @RodrigoMeazzi 8 років тому

    Obrigado!

  • @BocchiTheMeltDown
    @BocchiTheMeltDown 4 роки тому

    Both version ported to the PS2.

  • @passingbreeze173
    @passingbreeze173 Рік тому

    Me imagino a los programadores de megadrive pensando,joder vaya marrón😊,a ver cómo tiramos palante.

  • @felipes.carvalho8790
    @felipes.carvalho8790 4 роки тому

    esse jogo devia ter ido para o Sega CD ou 32 X pra ficar decente

  • @colonelsandwich641
    @colonelsandwich641 8 років тому

    At least they tried.

  • @type2red
    @type2red 3 роки тому

    night & day difference!

  • @tetsuokenpachi
    @tetsuokenpachi 8 років тому

    I wouldn't compare an on rail shooter to a racing game...

  • @ErwinSchrodinger64
    @ErwinSchrodinger64 3 роки тому +1

    At 2:06 min/sec, I had to stop watching. Sega's Y-Board was just too powerful of a sprite generator. Yes, while the Meda Drive/Genesis had one Motorola 68000 at approximately 7.00 MHz, Sega's Y-Board and three. Each running at 12MHz. Plus a plethora of other graphical support chips.

  • @MarcoPolo82
    @MarcoPolo82 7 років тому +2

    Esse jogo nunca deveria ter sido portado.

    • @paoloretrogamer
      @paoloretrogamer 6 років тому

      Pq?

    • @MarcoPolo82
      @MarcoPolo82 5 років тому +1

      @@paoloretrogamer O Mega não tinha condições de rodá-lo, o Arcade é muito superior. O mesmo vale pro Thinderblade.

    • @hartur4672
      @hartur4672 4 роки тому +1

      @@MarcoPolo82 daria pra ter feito um port MUITO mas MUITO superior ao resultado final, mas isso daria bem mais trabalho e muito tempo. Não dá pra dizer que os responsáveis pelo port foram preguiçosos, até pq talvez nem tempo eles tiveram pra isso. Enfim, igual ao de Arcade é impossível mas bem mais semelhante seria possível sim.

  • @RetroGames4K
    @RetroGames4K Рік тому

    Wow! I never seen the arcade version. Now I look the mega drive version poor and terrible...

  • @marcin.the.gamer.
    @marcin.the.gamer. 5 років тому

    😂 😁it cant even be comperable to arcade.
    I " hate" Genesis or Sega Megadrive, because it had that annoying robotic sound quality and lacking colours palette 🎨
    It was savage caveman comparded to Super Nintendo Snes.
    Sega was great, but i familiatrized with it in late mid 90`, in Poland.
    Harder times but some friends already had PS1 so Sega Megardive was obsolete.
    I mean was great but when you once seen Saturn or PS1 or Pc game, Megadrive was like old annoying piece of old steampunk console

  • @felipes.carvalho8790
    @felipes.carvalho8790 4 роки тому

    a versão do mega é extremamente capada e a nave fica atirando sozinha porque existe uma falta de precisão nesse jogo porque o processador fica funcionando no maximo. é um port muito mal feito como o port do After Burne que ficou horroroso e injogavel no mega drive, tudo isso ocorre porque o mega drive não fez uso de chips especiais nos cartuchos