@Uncle Joe S CaliT has proven pretty solid in reliability. None of key components (engine, trans, magniride suspension, folding roof) are new to the Porto, so no reason to think it would be any different. Heard a few little trim & related issues, as with any Ferrari, but still streets ahead of Mac or Aston in that dept. And eff off with the Kia comparison...very different segment, different purposes, etc. Like interrupting a discussion on Scotch to say Absolut is cheaper and you like it. Yah, great, so what, go away
@Uncle Joe S Totally agree, buying a Ferrari -- or frankly, any car over $150k -- is an illogical decision. There are objectively better vehicles for way less. No-one is arguing with that. That's why Ferrari make 9,000 cars a year and Hyundai make north of a million. But that's not going to stop me illogically buying a Ferrari when I can afford to step up :)
Man this channel went so fast from cheap everyday motors to high end exotics. Its great to see you growing and getting access to such special cars... but don't forget about the more mundane stuff too! I like a mix and would bet that most viewers do as well :)
Andy well, as long as a souped up Jag gets 3x as many views as most high end sports cars, I’m sure James will not forget the more mundane cars for sure 😁👍
Looks like a well thought through car, amazed how far back the engine is! Excellent detail touches, particularly the climate functions for quick access. This is a Ferrari that knows its audience
I know a lot of Ferrari fans say these aren’t “real” Ferrari’s but they’re so awesome. As far as GT convertibles go, this is the dream. Just a masterpiece.
I agree, I used to work at Lamborghini North Scottsdale and normally the customers interested in the DB11 Volante' were cross shopping next door with the Portofinos
I love the Portofino, and liked the California too, it’s the only 2+2 with a 2 piece folding roof, this is the same simple mechanism as a Z4 rather than a complex multi piece like a 4 series. Even though the back seats are useless I still like to have them for emergencies/luggage, and it looks like a 2 seater, the back seats don’t ruin the proportions by taking up too much room
Great review. 4:18 This is actually a smart move by Ferrari. As Ferrari's entry level model, the Portofino is likely to be driven much more frequently than higher spec models and so the extra ride height grants you the extra clearance you'll need to get over all those speed bumps. Similar reasoning with the thicker tyres - heavier use calls for thicker tyres which give a more comfortable ride.
Some people refer to the Portofino as the "Housewives Ferrari". But to be honest, aside from the GTC4 Lusso, there's no other model that's getting driven more frequently. I would take one and daily if I had the money.
There's a growing number of very, very rich people about now. The option prices are almost irrelevant. They'll spec everything up and Ferrari will make a huge profit on those cars. 'Regular' well off folk will buy a base model on finance which is relatively affordable.
I would love to walk into a ferrari dealer, sit down in the configuration zone with my sales executive and just say no to every option. "this piece in carbon is £1450" me " no, plastic is fine" £18,000 for matt paint? No ill have gloss and get matt ppf, cheaper plus protection. The world is mad!
A good Ferrari dealer/sales exec won't force or ask you to take any option you don't want or ask for tbh. Also, happily, any of the interior stuff you don't spec as carbon comes as aluminium rather than plastic, which is nice, I guess.
@@gazzabrownhigh8891 that's pretty much my point Gazza. The whole thing is a racket. I don't understand people's fascination with visible carbon and its exorbitant price. Carbon fibre is a structural marvel, but to be selling it as trinkets and nearly doubling the price of the base car is pure madness and is driven by social media influencers
One thing needing clarification, the carbon 'cupholder' 6:35 at £1400 is a tad misleading. The Carbon Cupholder also includes all the carbon bits surrounding it, as well as the carbon bits around the window/roof operation buttons and the key slot. Ironically the £1600 carbon bridge has less (visible) carbon than the £1400 carbon 'cupholder' (which isn't *just* the cupholder). Either way doesn't make the options list of this and most modern Ferraris any less obscene. Good old Ferrari doing their usual Ferrari things.
Don't forget to hit the bell icon people! You might not be his biggest fan for any number of reasons but I think you could agree this is the kind of person we should be giving the algorithm to! He has an air of responsibility about him in my opinion, whatchu think?
I agree with you about the part where you sit in the car and look what's in front of you. That stuff is absolutely beautiful, the displays, the central rev meter, the wheel... You want that when you sit in a car of this kind.
One thing that immediately stands out to me is the beautiful allen head lug nuts that will help protect your wheels from scratches during tire changes.
I love the paint finish and it even makes me not mind the silver. The way paint looks all frosty before wet-sanding or clear is always my favourite. Jumping right into 2020 eh JayEmm?
The roof is even cooler when you realise that you can operate it while driving - something you couldn't do in the Cali/Cali T. It then becomes significantly less cool when you actually operate the roof while driving, and have all the crap in your boot fall out onto the road. (Yes this happened to me, yes I'm an idiot.)
I like the 3rd gen Miata for how they handled the folding roof for it: it's just the front half of the rear deck that lifts up like an oversized wing, and the real cargo compartment stays shut ( ua-cam.com/video/WGLaWfUnc8k/v-deo.html ). Although I wish the roof storage and the trunk were connected-they are separate compartments in that car.
@@Runoratsu The 488 Spider has a similar mechanism for the folding roof, however this makes sense as the engine is at the rear. The Portofino's roof is also much bigger since it's a 2+2 hence I guess having such a mechanism that opens the boot is a necessary evil. :(
Great review. I like how you mentioned the infotainment having physical buttons/wheels, Tesla has been a bad influence in that regards with cars going full touchscreen. It's too expensive for me whereas I could afford the F Type SVR but still enjoyed this.
@Uncle Joe S Was just trying to figure out which angle you're coming from. I have one which I've used as a daily since I got it, (so around 9 months now). Insurance is fairly reasonable and if you don't go crazy on the options like this press one, negotiate a discount, (or if you pick one up used), it'll set you back around £160k. Not much more than a Bentley Continental/brand new McLaren 570s/very high spec high end AMG, all of which I've seen plenty of people dailying. And out of all those, the Ferrari will probably have the best residual value, from my personal experience anyway. 7 years free servicing and 4 years intl warranty so no maintenance to worry about. Fairly economical with fuel if you drive sensibly (hard to drive sensibly in a Ferrari but it is possible). Decent sized boot, and plenty of storage space inside. Yes, obviously not many people have £160k lying around to spend on an everyday car, but if you do, it's probably one of the best cars around to daily.
@Uncle Joe S Haha no worries you weren't being rude, unfortunately stupid costs come part and parcel with a car experience like this and I think it's worth sharing all the good and bad aspects of owning and driving cars like these! I can see where you're coming from. I live in central London where Ferraris/Lambos etc are very common place and used frequently by a lot of Londoners as daily drivers. Over here, if you have a subtle spec you can get away with relative anonymity due to the sheer amount of other flashy hypercars rolling around that pull more attention over a subtly spec'd Portofino. Don't get me wrong, as much as I love dailying a car like this, I also have a VW Polo for when the stress of driving something like that becomes too much and I need a break, and it's honestly very freeing, lmao. An MX-5 is an excellent car and a good choice. Enjoy your sleep and have a wonderful day my dude, take care and cheers!
Thank you great review they don't price the options on the website. Can I ask were you nervous of speed bumps and of someone opening a door on it and denting it when you left it and if so did it affect your enjoyment. All the best from your friends on ROI.
Silly questions: Is this front end high enough so that it doesn't scratch on sloped driveways (that are prevalent in the US)? What could one do for that (avoid frequently replacing front end air spoiler) ... installing an air suspension kit?
@@namegoeshere6638 I'm with you, very puzzling we seem to be in the minority as I thought that the Cali was a much prettier car, this one wants to look more masculine/muscular but the front especially doesn't quite look right.-Mr STT
There was a time when Ferrari deliberately had no options. It was "that's the car, take it or leave it". The paint option alone was almost the price of my first Ferrari (308), but I don't think you can get sub-£20k Ferraris that aren't money pits anymore.
Great thorough review Jay. I get you can only compare to cars you've driven, but sorry, I can't see anyone cross-shopping a Porto and Jag F-Type. Aston DB11, Bentley GT V8, Porsche 911 Turbo are surely more realistic for someone who wants supercar sense-of-occasion in a more comfortable, less bling package than a mid-engined supercar I love the Porto but then I'm weird and actually really like the CaliT too... drives great, feels special, pretty solid reliability and looking very attractive at current deals
An interesting review. I’m not sure as nice as it is that it works for me. Why is it so high at the front. They spend loads of time designing it then do that to it.
It almost looks in that last bit when you drive away as well as your comment about the car seeming to be high that there is a lift kit perhaps? It almost looks like the front of a 488 when the lift kit is engaged. it wasn't listed in the options and you didn't mention it otherwise. So you know if that's an option?
seems to me that most manufacturers, especially at the higher end, know that most cars will be bought with a host of options, they can see the profiles and put the base price , i.e. headline figure, as low as they can or even at a loss, knowing full well that a few must have options will take them into profit and a few more will push the profit up. If they add too much to the standard price, it would have been listed at 200k+ and everyone would say it is priced too high.
When you press the home button underneath the centre display, it took your £250000 ka1 second before it actually change the screen. That's on a par with a Chinese phone that costs £25
I may have missed it, but how many torsos actually fit in that trunk? Asking for a friend! Apart from that, great review. Ferrari really are in a league of their own.
Will need Magneride too but aside from that you're pretty much right. Alternatively you can (In the UK anyway) pick up a decent spec and slightly used Portofino for ~£160k anyway, so win/win if you're not stuck on getting a brand new one.
A question to Jay. What's the difference between an Sports, Super and Hyper Car ? Good Review of the Ferrari. In terms of styling, I find the front a bit weird in that I cannot help feeling that the car has an extremely prominent "smile" which is at odds with say the 458/488 which is more aggressive ? Just a personal observation. I'm sure I'll get used to though.
I would have a mechanic remove the motors from the roof and make it retract manually or itll cost 100,000 quick to keep operating mechanically over the next 10 years
Wonder why lots of those things are different on the configurator? No apple carplay listed. There is a sports exhaust option listed. Different wheels? No choice over the side wing badges
Excellent video. Looking forward to the driving part. This car, while similar on paper to the GTC and Jag, has an entirely different feel about it. The GTC and Jag are fine cars but not the equal of the Porto on a daily driver basis in so many aspects aside from straight empirical data. On paper a Dodge Hellcat will beat cars many times its price in acceleration but that doesn't make it an equal proposition. Similar situation here. This car is a cut above those, but perhaps not so different from similarly priced choices which would be much closer in the level of refinement, luxury, public perception and making every drive an occasion.
Plus your dealer doesn’t want to fight you and the car is actually well made 😁
Just look at older models and second hand market experiences ?
@Uncle Joe S CaliT has proven pretty solid in reliability. None of key components (engine, trans, magniride suspension, folding roof) are new to the Porto, so no reason to think it would be any different. Heard a few little trim & related issues, as with any Ferrari, but still streets ahead of Mac or Aston in that dept.
And eff off with the Kia comparison...very different segment, different purposes, etc. Like interrupting a discussion on Scotch to say Absolut is cheaper and you like it. Yah, great, so what, go away
@Uncle Joe S Totally agree, buying a Ferrari -- or frankly, any car over $150k -- is an illogical decision. There are objectively better vehicles for way less. No-one is arguing with that. That's why Ferrari make 9,000 cars a year and Hyundai make north of a million. But that's not going to stop me illogically buying a Ferrari when I can afford to step up :)
Carl Maissan the FUCK did I just read....
@Smitty Rock I had a stroke trying to read your comment. Try some punctuation sometime; it's free.
Man this channel went so fast from cheap everyday motors to high end exotics. Its great to see you growing and getting access to such special cars... but don't forget about the more mundane stuff too! I like a mix and would bet that most viewers do as well :)
Andy well, as long as a souped up Jag gets 3x as many views as most high end sports cars, I’m sure James will not forget the more mundane cars for sure 😁👍
Andy, Monday's video is for you
@@JayEmmOnCars looking forward to it 😁
@Chris Stevens the channel will be featuring more EVs but for now fossil fuel cars arent going anywhere - and the argument is not a simple one
@Chris Stevens I think in that Orwellian scenario I'd have a lot more to worry about than my view count
Looks like a well thought through car, amazed how far back the engine is! Excellent detail touches, particularly the climate functions for quick access.
This is a Ferrari that knows its audience
I know a lot of Ferrari fans say these aren’t “real” Ferrari’s but they’re so awesome. As far as GT convertibles go, this is the dream. Just a masterpiece.
Well, most Ferrari fan's will never be able to afford one anyhow. Their opinions are irellevant.
@@Memovox well said.
More like this is an Aston DB11 V8 and Bentley Continental GT V8 rival. Front engined, RWD coupé both of them.
I agree, I used to work at Lamborghini North Scottsdale and normally the customers interested in the DB11 Volante' were cross shopping next door with the Portofinos
Content, research, good videography and, most important, no variations in sound. Good on you and you deserve to have 100k + subs this new year.
I love the Portofino, and liked the California too, it’s the only 2+2 with a 2 piece folding roof, this is the same simple mechanism as a Z4 rather than a complex multi piece like a 4 series. Even though the back seats are useless I still like to have them for emergencies/luggage, and it looks like a 2 seater, the back seats don’t ruin the proportions by taking up too much room
Great review.
4:18 This is actually a smart move by Ferrari. As Ferrari's entry level model, the Portofino is likely to be driven much more frequently than higher spec models and so the extra ride height grants you the extra clearance you'll need to get over all those speed bumps. Similar reasoning with the thicker tyres - heavier use calls for thicker tyres which give a more comfortable ride.
Some people refer to the Portofino as the "Housewives Ferrari". But to be honest, aside from the GTC4 Lusso, there's no other model that's getting driven more frequently. I would take one and daily if I had the money.
AND, in part three, I'm going to give it....a JayScore......😉
+ Heavy breathing
Yes.. But with a better filming
The paint option on that car cost more than my Octavia Vrs second hand less than 1 year old. It came with apple car play and android.
Ferrari charge that much because they can
Boycott Ferraris until they show us poor people some respect. May be they won't
There's a growing number of very, very rich people about now. The option prices are almost irrelevant. They'll spec everything up and Ferrari will make a huge profit on those cars. 'Regular' well off folk will buy a base model on finance which is relatively affordable.
@@greathey1234 no chance because they know that it's unlikely we would ever be their customers
You can buy a condo for that money where I live in Asia
Great insight again....makes paying £550 for the silver paint on my wifes new car seem so realistic !
I would love to walk into a ferrari dealer, sit down in the configuration zone with my sales executive and just say no to every option. "this piece in carbon is £1450" me " no, plastic is fine"
£18,000 for matt paint? No ill have gloss and get matt ppf, cheaper plus protection.
The world is mad!
A good Ferrari dealer/sales exec won't force or ask you to take any option you don't want or ask for tbh. Also, happily, any of the interior stuff you don't spec as carbon comes as aluminium rather than plastic, which is nice, I guess.
Mclaren are even ridiculous for options..
@@strawman3059 Yep.
The hilarious thing is that matt paint is easier and cheaper to apply. Gloss paint is an absolute bear to get perfect. Matt/flat? Easy peasy.
@@gazzabrownhigh8891 that's pretty much my point Gazza. The whole thing is a racket. I don't understand people's fascination with visible carbon and its exorbitant price. Carbon fibre is a structural marvel, but to be selling it as trinkets and nearly doubling the price of the base car is pure madness and is driven by social media influencers
One thing needing clarification, the carbon 'cupholder' 6:35 at £1400 is a tad misleading. The Carbon Cupholder also includes all the carbon bits surrounding it, as well as the carbon bits around the window/roof operation buttons and the key slot. Ironically the £1600 carbon bridge has less (visible) carbon than the £1400 carbon 'cupholder' (which isn't *just* the cupholder). Either way doesn't make the options list of this and most modern Ferraris any less obscene. Good old Ferrari doing their usual Ferrari things.
Don't forget to hit the bell icon people! You might not be his biggest fan for any number of reasons but I think you could agree this is the kind of person we should be giving the algorithm to! He has an air of responsibility about him in my opinion, whatchu think?
"I love my job".
This is a home run for Ferrari. Bravo!
wow, JayEmm goes from strength to strength...what a way to start a new decade....
I love this little, incredibly expensive car. Definitely one of my favourites on the channel (so far)
Looks like a 407 coupe from the front! But no bad thing
Yes exactly!!!! Same design house i think
wilmotandrobottom probably both Pinnifarina designs
Thought the Sam e
Loved this car was brilliant
That paint is just incredible.
A Ferrari press car? Another great step James; congrats! 👍👍
I agree with you about the part where you sit in the car and look what's in front of you. That stuff is absolutely beautiful, the displays, the central rev meter, the wheel... You want that when you sit in a car of this kind.
The front height looks very odd, does it have a lift engaged for speed bumps etc???
I thought that, too.
It looks like they designed it to have a very practical ride height for everyday use.
No lift available on this car
JayEmm on Cars strange, really does look odd! Great review, looking forward to the 2nd part 👍👍
I love the satin silver. You could just option Argento Nurburgring and put on a satin wrap for way less.
The only thing I like about silver is that it's the best looking colour when dirty, seems to hide the grime.
Strangely, it suits the Porto.
Thank you for this excellent review. Looking forward to part 2. Lovely, lovely Ferrari!
One thing that immediately stands out to me is the beautiful allen head lug nuts that will help protect your wheels from scratches during tire changes.
I love the paint finish and it even makes me not mind the silver. The way paint looks all frosty before wet-sanding or clear is always my favourite.
Jumping right into 2020 eh JayEmm?
The roof is even cooler when you realise that you can operate it while driving - something you couldn't do in the Cali/Cali T. It then becomes significantly less cool when you actually operate the roof while driving, and have all the crap in your boot fall out onto the road. (Yes this happened to me, yes I'm an idiot.)
I like the 3rd gen Miata for how they handled the folding roof for it: it's just the front half of the rear deck that lifts up like an oversized wing, and the real cargo compartment stays shut ( ua-cam.com/video/WGLaWfUnc8k/v-deo.html ). Although I wish the roof storage and the trunk were connected-they are separate compartments in that car.
@@Runoratsu The 488 Spider has a similar mechanism for the folding roof, however this makes sense as the engine is at the rear. The Portofino's roof is also much bigger since it's a 2+2 hence I guess having such a mechanism that opens the boot is a necessary evil. :(
Great video had my Portofino 2 month loved every minute so far even in the rain.
My Alfa was cheaper than a carbon fiber cup holder cover. Unbelievable. Despite the mad pricing on the options it's a magnificent car to behold.
I’ll take one in three years and 10,000 miles when it’s realistically priced
thats what i did for a cali T
I am not a fan of the Californias but the Portofino isn't bad, especially in the right color, those options though, Jesus.
I like this idea of the two videos for the car . I preferred the interior video 😄 Happy New Year
My current favourite Ferrari. Thank you Jay, i am looking Forward to Part 2. Didnt Know about the engine sitting so low and behind. Very interesting
Frameless rear view mirror is a very good attention to detail
Great video James, getting better and better.
Looking forward to part 2. When will you release it?
Great review. I like how you mentioned the infotainment having physical buttons/wheels, Tesla has been a bad influence in that regards with cars going full touchscreen. It's too expensive for me whereas I could afford the F Type SVR but still enjoyed this.
I blink and hey, another 2k subscribers, you're on the right track! Maybe at 100k Ferrari will give you a go in more appropriate weather 😂
Telegraph Road is a great song! And clearly as you say, that car is a very special place to be in.
@Uncle Joe S Why is a Ferrari a bad daily driver in your opinion?
@Uncle Joe S Was just trying to figure out which angle you're coming from. I have one which I've used as a daily since I got it, (so around 9 months now). Insurance is fairly reasonable and if you don't go crazy on the options like this press one, negotiate a discount, (or if you pick one up used), it'll set you back around £160k. Not much more than a Bentley Continental/brand new McLaren 570s/very high spec high end AMG, all of which I've seen plenty of people dailying. And out of all those, the Ferrari will probably have the best residual value, from my personal experience anyway.
7 years free servicing and 4 years intl warranty so no maintenance to worry about. Fairly economical with fuel if you drive sensibly (hard to drive sensibly in a Ferrari but it is possible). Decent sized boot, and plenty of storage space inside. Yes, obviously not many people have £160k lying around to spend on an everyday car, but if you do, it's probably one of the best cars around to daily.
@Uncle Joe S Haha no worries you weren't being rude, unfortunately stupid costs come part and parcel with a car experience like this and I think it's worth sharing all the good and bad aspects of owning and driving cars like these! I can see where you're coming from. I live in central London where Ferraris/Lambos etc are very common place and used frequently by a lot of Londoners as daily drivers. Over here, if you have a subtle spec you can get away with relative anonymity due to the sheer amount of other flashy hypercars rolling around that pull more attention over a subtly spec'd Portofino. Don't get me wrong, as much as I love dailying a car like this, I also have a VW Polo for when the stress of driving something like that becomes too much and I need a break, and it's honestly very freeing, lmao.
An MX-5 is an excellent car and a good choice. Enjoy your sleep and have a wonderful day my dude, take care and cheers!
Hey what a great start to the New Year... You lucky dog....GN
I know right?
Across the pond, many of these are sitting unsold on dealer lot. Buyers know the depreciation on front engine models are significant.
Ferris Bueller's day of 2020.
Big City yeah yeah!
How much do you think it will cost roughly in 5-10 years?
It is simply beautiful
Thank you great review they don't price the options on the website. Can I ask were you nervous of speed bumps and of someone opening a door on it and denting it when you left it and if so did it affect your enjoyment. All the best from your friends on ROI.
Silly questions: Is this front end high enough so that it doesn't scratch on sloped driveways (that are prevalent in the US)? What could one do for that (avoid frequently replacing front end air spoiler) ... installing an air suspension kit?
Looks so similar to the California T that I wouldn't know the difference if seen on the road.
The sensors on the grill are far too noticeable.
They probably don't stand out as much with a stock chrome grille.
So is the camera on the Urus and Cayenne.
@@KUROSHURA impressive of you to use two different synonyms for the word garbage.
@@JCDenton95 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Gorgeous Ferrari model Top-drawer review !
I think the Cali T was pretty bad ass actually...
Love your work, Sir!
Does carbon fibre mean "licence to print money" in Italian?
A fully loaded AMG GTC soft top would be a natural rival.
if you like the awful dealer network and a five year old car, suppose so.
Oh no, the Ferrari drives, sounds and looks so much better.
know that is much better looking than those Mclarens! so nice looking and stunning looking head on!
The roof operation is almost exactly the same on a BMW Z4 E89.. Sure, much less desirable but also a lot more affordable for most people..
@@namegoeshere6638 I'm with you, very puzzling we seem to be in the minority as I thought that the Cali was a much prettier car, this one wants to look more masculine/muscular but the front especially doesn't quite look right.-Mr STT
Looks like Ferrari is just selling you a name with this one.
looks shit. the California T looks way better imo.
What would be wrong with a standard no options car ?
That color is sick but how do you maintain a matte color like that?
There was a time when Ferrari deliberately had no options. It was "that's the car, take it or leave it". The paint option alone was almost the price of my first Ferrari (308), but I don't think you can get sub-£20k Ferraris that aren't money pits anymore.
Great thorough review Jay. I get you can only compare to cars you've driven, but sorry, I can't see anyone cross-shopping a Porto and Jag F-Type. Aston DB11, Bentley GT V8, Porsche 911 Turbo are surely more realistic for someone who wants supercar sense-of-occasion in a more comfortable, less bling package than a mid-engined supercar I love the Porto but then I'm weird and actually really like the CaliT too... drives great, feels special, pretty solid reliability and looking very attractive at current deals
PS - Congrats on getting yourself access to a Ferrari presser! Things are looking good for the channel!
Stunning machine
That roof is a work of art.
It's a very standard folding sequence for most powered hard tops. My E89 folded the same way from 2009
Just wow, what a car!
The car seems to be literally breathtaking for you 😀
Lol i was thinking the same thing
An interesting review. I’m not sure as nice as it is that it works for me. Why is it so high at the front. They spend loads of time designing it then do that to it.
It almost looks in that last bit when you drive away as well as your comment about the car seeming to be high that there is a lift kit perhaps? It almost looks like the front of a 488 when the lift kit is engaged. it wasn't listed in the options and you didn't mention it otherwise. So you know if that's an option?
seems to me that most manufacturers, especially at the higher end, know that most cars will be bought with a host of options, they can see the profiles and put the base price , i.e. headline figure, as low as they can or even at a loss, knowing full well that a few must have options will take them into profit and a few more will push the profit up. If they add too much to the standard price, it would have been listed at 200k+ and everyone would say it is priced too high.
The Best Job in the world .... Reviewing Cars 😍😎
It looks very nice...!!!
That look reminds me very much abt my BMW Z4!
This is an awesome car.
When you press the home button underneath the centre display, it took your £250000 ka1 second before it actually change the screen. That's on a par with a Chinese phone that costs £25
Nice review, Jay, of an obviously brilliant car. I’d be happy to accept one, but would much prefer it in Ferrari red. 👍
I'm with you on that
Ferrari have nailed it with the looks on the Portofino. The California always looked a bit unbalanced.
Damn, the paint is 10 times more expensive than my proton gen2
I may have missed it, but how many torsos actually fit in that trunk? Asking for a friend! Apart from that, great review. Ferrari really are in a league of their own.
nice review, you sound a bit like doug de mouro but for the european market :)
Really enjoyed this review. Very well made. Love the car. Would personally find it hard to justify a spec above 200k if I was buying one personally.
You could have a great car for 200k
I've seen the base base model and I think it's really enough. If you add the carbon drivers zone, that's all the added functionality you need.
Will need Magneride too but aside from that you're pretty much right. Alternatively you can (In the UK anyway) pick up a decent spec and slightly used Portofino for ~£160k anyway, so win/win if you're not stuck on getting a brand new one.
@@FF-qv8en true. I've never really had a problem with the California either, you can find a nicely spec'd model in the usa for as little as 80k.
Just curious, options, being what they are - options, what'd a car look like without all those carbon fibre oppos? Would they even sell you one?
A question to Jay. What's the difference between an Sports, Super and Hyper Car ? Good Review of the Ferrari.
In terms of styling, I find the front a bit weird in that I cannot help feeling that the car has an extremely prominent "smile" which is at odds with say the 458/488 which is more aggressive ? Just a personal observation. I'm sure I'll get used to though.
How much for the floor mats????????
I would have a mechanic remove the motors from the roof and make it retract manually or itll cost 100,000 quick to keep operating mechanically over the next 10 years
Wonder why lots of those things are different on the configurator? No apple carplay listed. There is a sports exhaust option listed. Different wheels? No choice over the side wing badges
Happy New year fella...
Is that how it sits or was the lift kit on
No lift option on these
Excellent video. Looking forward to the driving part. This car, while similar on paper to the GTC and Jag, has an entirely different feel about it. The GTC and Jag are fine cars but not the equal of the Porto on a daily driver basis in so many aspects aside from straight empirical data. On paper a Dodge Hellcat will beat cars many times its price in acceleration but that doesn't make it an equal proposition. Similar situation here. This car is a cut above those, but perhaps not so different from similarly priced choices which would be much closer in the level of refinement, luxury, public perception and making every drive an occasion.
Looks like a baby 812..I saw one in furco red or how ever it's spelt looked stunning
Surely the Aston DB11 is a more direct competitor?
Huge improvement over the California, and a better name to go with it!
I think better rivals are the Aston Martin DB11 Convertible or the Bentley Continental V8 Convertible
The Aston yes, but the Bentley not so much
I would say a closer comparison is the f type and the amg gt r maybe? The mclaren is def compared to the 488
Gear paddles don’t move because you shouldn’t be changing gear mid corner.
Obviously they make the wiring loom compatible with everything as standard...kching.
Why is the carbon driver zone an essential option?
This review convinced me to buy this car.. now i just need to find the money
Welcome to 2020 where panel gaps are a fashion statement rather than shoddy build quality.
Ryanair were clearly inspired by Ferrari. Who'd have thought it?