Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

#SmartPLS4

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 чер 2022
  • The session will discuss in detail how to assess convergent validity using SmartPLS4. Further the session also discusses how to solve different convergent validity issues.
    Last Session (P1):
    (P1): • #SmartPLS4 Series 7.1 ...
    (P1): • #SmartPLS4 Series 7.2 ...
    Next Session: • #SmartPLS4 Series 9 - ...
    Basic Model in SmartPLS4
    • #SmartPLS4 Series 4 - ...
    For Lecture Notes and much more, visit
    researchwithfa...
    #smartpls #smartpls4 #plssem #pls #ConvergentValidity #ConstructValidity

КОМЕНТАРІ • 29

  • @jainyritesh
    @jainyritesh 5 місяців тому +1

    A quick question, in SMARTPLS 4, there are two options to run alogirthm, standard and consistent. My results are quite different in CFA model testing when using consistent vs standard algorithm. So which one to use?

    • @researchwithfawad
      @researchwithfawad  5 місяців тому

      Go for Normal PLS Algorithm

    • @jainyritesh
      @jainyritesh 4 місяці тому

      @@researchwithfawad James Gaskin suggest using consistent algorithm when all constructs are reflective, which is my case. Still one can use Standard option?

  • @ninsiimaracheal8838
    @ninsiimaracheal8838 4 місяці тому

    Prof, thank you so much for your educative videos. My concern here is, what do I do for a construct whose item loadings(it has three loadings, the rest were loading low and i deleted them) are all well above the threshold value of 0.70, but its alpha and rho_a are 0.667 amd 0.68 respectively? Should I entirely remove the construct from the measurement model or ?

    • @researchwithfawad
      @researchwithfawad  4 місяці тому

      Thanks for watching. If your composite reliability is over 0.70, you are good to go. There is no need to delete the construct. Alpha is low because of lesser no of items in the construct.

  • @aliaathar6130
    @aliaathar6130 29 днів тому

    Hello sir, my AVE is above 0.5 but there is an issue with Cronbach Apha and Rho_a below 0.7 in two variables out of 7 is that an issue????

  • @Alhamzah_F_Abbas
    @Alhamzah_F_Abbas Рік тому +1

    Great work. could you please share the Excel sheet you just used in the video?. Thank you, prof.

    • @researchwithfawad
      @researchwithfawad  Рік тому +1

      Please visit
      researchwithfawad.com/index.php/download-research-resources/

  • @SahooSir.tourism
    @SahooSir.tourism 4 місяці тому

    Good Evening Sir, You informed that, Indicators having value between 0.4 to 0.7 can also be kept (don't delete) if AVE is > 0.5 and Composite Reliability (rho_c) >0.7.
    But sir in my case AVE is >0.5, CR>0.7 but Cronbach alpha ( α ) is coming less than 0.7. What should I do sir? Please guide us. Thank you

    • @researchwithfawad
      @researchwithfawad  4 місяці тому +1

      Don't worry about Alpha. If CR is fine, the construct is reliable

    • @SahooSir.tourism
      @SahooSir.tourism 4 місяці тому

      @@researchwithfawad Thank you so much Sir for replying. It means a lot. I wasn't sure if at all you will reply. I am very much grateful to you sir. Thanks a ton.
      Actually in my case, in two of the lower order constructs (LOC) of Organisation culture (HOC) the CR is >0.7 & AVE>0.5 but Cronbach alpha is nearly 0.5.
      Earlier after data collection when the reliability was checked it was all above 0.8 but now it has reduced due to removal of some items. So I was very much in dilemma about what to be done. But thank you so much sir for your suggestions.
      Thanks a ton.
      Have a great day !!

  • @nourelaminekhalifeh
    @nourelaminekhalifeh Рік тому

    Thank you for this lecture, in case of having AVE below 0.5 while Cronbach alpha and Rho-c above 0.7, what should we do?

    • @researchwithfawad
      @researchwithfawad  Рік тому +1

      Pleasure l. I am glad you liked it l. Yes, if AVE is over 0.40 and CR is over 0.70, there is no issue of validity.

    • @mohdabad2069
      @mohdabad2069 2 місяці тому

      @@researchwithfawad, sir please suggest some studies to justify (AVE is over 0.40 and CR is over 0.70, there is no issue of validity)

  • @sobiaraja9443
    @sobiaraja9443 10 місяців тому +1

    Sir, you said in one of your videos that you will teach SmartPLS through the process macros technique. i couldn't find that. could you please help me with it?

    • @researchwithfawad
      @researchwithfawad  10 місяців тому

      Thanks for your interest. Please watch
      SmartPLS4: ua-cam.com/play/PLb7vm6tsQ3Kv4YWhYNkP7DizqOjT7ubSX.html

    • @sobiaraja9443
      @sobiaraja9443 10 місяців тому

      @@researchwithfawad this is introduction video. I checked the whole series but process macros seems missing 🥲

  • @kulkinfm
    @kulkinfm 9 місяців тому

    Sir, if my outer loading is smaller than 0.7, Can I inscrese them and how? Thanks, sir!

  • @pratikasingh0490
    @pratikasingh0490 Рік тому

    Sir, I have three outer loadings of 0.692, 0.618, and 0.593 for three different constructs. Do I remove these items?
    For one construct, my Cronbach alpha is 0.676, and rho_a is 0.695, but my rho-c value is 0.820, and AVE is 0.604. For another construct, my Cronbach alpha is 0.693, rho_a is 0.694, but rho_c is 0.809, and AVE is 0.514. My HTMT values are fine and within the limits, and the Fornell-Larcker criterion and cross-loadings are also fine. What should i do in this case? If it is okay can you please share a reference for the same?

  • @fizzaikram4802
    @fizzaikram4802 Рік тому

    Sir thank you for the video. I wanted to ask what if the composite reliability of one item is 0.97 and the rest of the values are within the threshold. Is it ok to use it? Can you share your paper related to it?

    • @researchwithfawad
      @researchwithfawad  Рік тому

      CR is not for one item. It is for the scale.

    • @fizzaikram4802
      @fizzaikram4802 Рік тому

      @@researchwithfawad sorry i meant for the scale...if the CR of one scale is 0.97 can we still use it?

    • @researchwithfawad
      @researchwithfawad  Рік тому

      It is high but not completely unacceptable

    • @fizzaikram4802
      @fizzaikram4802 Рік тому

      @@researchwithfawad all other values such as loadings, AVE and CA are absolutely fine and only CR is 0.975. Can i still use it?

    • @researchwithfawad
      @researchwithfawad  Рік тому

      Yes