#SmartPLS4

The session focuses on how to assess the measurement model output to check Reliability and Construct Validity.
Measurement Model assessment is the first step in the structural equation modelling. As part of Measurement Model Assessment the Construct Reliability is evaluated through Cronbach's Alpha and Composite Reliability. Construct validity is checked through Convergent Validity and Discriminant Validity (Fornell & Larcker Criterion, Cross Loadings, and Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio).
Previous Session (How to Interpret Measurement Model Output - PLS Algorithm):
• #SmartPLS4 Series 12 -...
Complete SmartPLS4 Playlist:
• SmartPLS4
How to Check Reliability in #SmartPLS4: • #SmartPLS4 Series 7.2 ...
Basic Concept of Convergent and Discriminant Validity: • #SmartPLS4 Series 6 - ...
How to Check Convergent Validity: • #SmartPLS4 Series 8 - ...
How to Check Discriminant Validity: • #SmartPLS4 Series 9 - ...
About:
Research With Fawad is a Research initiative to help young and early career research learn the research tools and techniques. It is an initiative to share research knowledge and help researchers learn to research the easy way.
Learn more about Research With Fawad at www.researchwithfawad.com.
#SmartPLS4 #MeasurementModel #DiscriminantValidity #ConstructValidity #SmartPLS #plssem #sem #DiscriminantValidity #Problem_DiscriminantValidity

[@niloofarfallahi9156]

Thank you, professor, so much for the time and effort you put into making these precious videos. I followed you, sir, and recommended your channel to all my classmates who are preparing their thesis.

[@researchwithfawad]

Glad you like them! I am happy to know that the videos are helpful. Thanks for recommending and sharing.

[@nagalakhsmip651]

Thank you so much. Your video so useful to me to put stepforward of my thesis work. Communication was so good. Your clarity was so nice qnd its very easy to understand manner. Thank you to teaching us. Great work for teaching sir

[@researchwithfawad]

Thanks. I am glad you liked it.

[@Gojo_sotoro197]

Thank you, Sir May Allah (SWT) bless you abundantly. i am getting a very helpful information from you. Jazakallahkhair.🙏

[@researchwithfawad]

Jazak Allah Khair. Ameen.

[@JamTik734]

Thanks for sharing

[@researchwithfawad]

Thanks for watching!

[@smithanayakv]

Great lectures... very well simplified and presneted. Would you be able to share the word file you have displayed while reporting the measurement model

[@researchwithfawad]

Thanks for the appreciation. I am afraid you will have to rely on the video to extract relevant information as i lost a lost of my resources to Ransomware virus.

[@rate_it7564]

Thank you for the lecture. I wonder in the reflective model, if VIF is matter. My model shows every values is okay except too high VIF values. My model is reflective model with indicators. In addition, when it comes to calculation in Smartpls, what is the difference between standard algorithm and consistent algorithm? I am not sure this is regarding to reflective and formative model.

[@researchwithfawad]

Thanks for watching. VIF is normally high for reflective model, this is the reason it is not reported for reflective models. Use normal algorithm if you are not interested in reporting fits. For understanding formative constructs, please watch
ua-cam.com/video/pMbOO0H8-P4/v-deo.html

[@santhiy2647]

Thank you, professor. Handy video for students like us.

[@researchwithfawad]

You are welcome!

[@FatmaAhmedRagab]

Sir, Where can I find the references written in the reporting in this video? I checked your website also but I didn't find those references.

[@researchwithfawad]

Please type in Google Scholar with the Author name and year.

[@nuwanudayanga4859]

Thank you sir, what do when VIF is greater than 5. Reliability and validity values are okay.

[@researchwithfawad]

VIF is not required for reflective constructs and it may go over 5 in case of reflective constructs.

[@shubhamjain1334]

hello sir! how do we get the word file that you are showing in this video for interpretation?

[@researchwithfawad]

Thanks for watching. You can have the text on researchwithfawad.com

[@Simranjeetkaur-nh8vr]

sir I used you way of presenting the whole measurement model but in reliability part you said need not to present rho_a but now my guide is asking to add that but am not having access to SMART PLS anymore. what can I do now sir ?

[@researchwithfawad]

Please follow your guide. You may purchase a1month PLS license.

[@Alhamzah_F_Abbas]

Thank you, prof. could you please provide the reports for a thesis and for a paper

[@researchwithfawad]

Thanks. I am glad you liked it. I can share a sample thesis, you can email me.

[@BilalAkbar-ll7rv]

How can I download the template to report the measurement model and structural model in my paper?

[@researchwithfawad]

I am sorry but you will have to rely on the video.

[@santhiy2647]

Could you please help us share the paper you showed in the video? Thank you

[@researchwithfawad]

Thanks for your interest. Can you point me to the time in the video so i can see which paper i used.

[@santhiy2647]

@@researchwithfawad while reporting the results for the thesis, you showed that @ 1:14 seconds to 8 minutes

[@seemachahal5773]

Thanku so much sir for such wonderful videos , sir can u plz give the citation that if AVE of one construct is near to 5 (as you told in one of your video) and other things like alpha etc are ok then we can say that our convergent validity is establish although AVE is near to 5?

[@researchwithfawad]

Thanks for watching. Here is the reference
Fornell and Larcker (1981) suggested that a construct’s convergent validity is still adequate if it has AVE less than 0.50, but CR above 0.60.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

[@user-ee3or8yj3g]

Dear sir, What I need to do if one of my VIF number more than 0.5?

[@researchwithfawad]

0.5 or 5

[@user-ee3or8yj3g]

sr, >5@@researchwithfawad

[@sumanrana3695]

Sir When we delete an item to achieve significant discriminate validity ie< 0.80 how to write and where to write the information about the deletion of the item. Should it be added in the discriminate validity paragraph or in the starting when you mention the deletion of an item because of factor loading. kindly give some clarity on this.

[@researchwithfawad]

Mention in the discriminant validity section. Report why the item was removed.

[@brightscholars]

You have wrote "w" four times in your website link shared in the description. That's why website is not being browsed from the link given

[@researchwithfawad]

ohh. Thanks.

[@amalwijenayaka410]

Dear Sir, Could you please share a sample thesis and template word file relevant to above video please.

[@researchwithfawad]

To download, please type in Google
PhD Thesis using SmartPLS.
You will find a number of examples.

[@asyahkhan6553]

At if AVE value is less than 0.4 but CR value is good?

[@researchwithfawad]

Thanks for watching. It is not acceptable. Collect more data.

[@asyahkhan6553]

@@researchwithfawad its a pilot study actually. Do you recommend deleting items to increase AVE?

[@researchwithfawad]

Not in Pilot study. For pilot only check for reliability.

[@seemachahal5773]

And in my paper AVE is 0.452

[@researchwithfawad]

It is appropriate if CR is over 0.70.