A Plague Tale: Requiem - 120fps Patch tested on PS5, Xbox Series X|S & PC Technical Review
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 лип 2024
- Asobo delivered one of the standout games of 2022 in Requiem, itself a sequel to the great opening chapter in A plagues tale innocence. They have now seen fit to blow past the old 40fps limits on consoles with a whopping 120fps performance mode update to PS5 & Series X players. I put all consoles and PC through the test bed to see if this generation is really going to be limited to 30fps and do the Series S players get any nibbles?
Chapters
0:00 Introduction and video contents
0:37 The 30fps Conundrum on console and PC
2:30 Visual changes, sacrifices PS5, Xbox Series X|S
6:30 Summary of mode changes and visual wrap-up
9:10 PS5 vs Xbox Series X Quality mode performance test
13:40 PS5 vs Xbox Series X Performance mode test
17:00 Series S Single mode performance update test
17:46 PC new modes tested and benefits
20:30 Thanks and until next time
As a full time Software/Hardware Engineer for the past 35+ years I run this channel as a side project to my full time job. As such I have and remain fully independent and always sim to deliver concise, accurate, factual review, news and data to inform you as much as I can. Aside my supporters on Patreon and the decreasing revenue from UA-cam I also fund everything myself.
As such, if you do enjoy the content on the channel and site, then please consider Subscribing, Liking & sharing it where possible as all these things help increase my view, reach and play into the UA-cam Algorithm, thank you.
If you can please support my work on Patreon:-www.patreon.com/user?u=2632056 Thanks For Watching.
Please Like & Subscribe and leave comments below
Chat with me on twitter :- / n_x_g
Watch in 4K/60 for the best experience.
#plaguetalerequiem #ps5 #xboxseriesx #nxgtech - Ігри
Long live NX Gamer.
Would love to see Jedi Survivor revisited after another patch or so
Bought the game today because of the 60 fps update. Highly enjoyed the first game so it was time now.
I pledged an oath to never play the second because of how insulted I was that they had no announced plans for 60 fps patch. They won me back lol.
Absolutely brilliant sequel. You're gunna have a blast
Game was my goty for 22' it was an amazing game.
Updates like this are good to see in games. I never really believed that 30fps was back just because a few launches had 30fps caps when most games still were 60fps. It would be cool to see you cover Jedi Survivor as that game has plenty of performance issues relating to stuff like poor CPU utilization and no RT toggle on console.
Still wondering why they thought forced RT on console was a good idea for Jedi Survivor.
From 40 to ~100 fps is wild
with 1080p image scaled to 1440p and low pc setting and some even low than lowest pc setting available so that's is Wild.
@@ttwinsturbo don't see an issue with that, I was specifically referring since the original release was most likely limited by the CPUs
@@ttwinsturbo yeah this is a good point, you can tell they didnt spend as much time on 60fps as someone like gurilla would
60 fps mode honestly looks really bad but at least it will be smooth to play.
@@ttwinsturbo If you only played on uncapped vrr mode, you’d never know.
I always wait for your breakdowns. There's 4 to 6 people at DF and only 1 of you. I know this is YOUR BUSINESS.
It is so good to see some really good news on gaming after all these last events. The pure and simple amazing developers just having time to properly optimize their tech into the platforms. We get this: amazing visuals paired with very solid performance. Well done Asobo Studio! And of course, superb analysis by NX Gamer.
Ooo, shots fired at DF!
Great analysis. Guess I'll have to play it again lol
As always, great analysis Michael. I've been one of those few who choose to use the 40fps modes where available so I'll probably stick to it here as well, but it's good to see they went back to unlock the game for the majority who want more performance.
As for DF, it's been clear for a while that they're not above using a narrative in order to chase clicks. I still enjoy their vids, but its obvious when they make overly broad claims that don't really reflect what's reasonable
Could you tell me what did df said I m 9 months late
Great video!
Why oh why hasn't nx got a massive boost to subs yet? Come on folks!
Boggles my mind...
Yeah. I've been subscribed since his first video on the uncharted 4 reveal trailer.
@@gavinderulo12 - same!
Because he rarely uploads just like analog foundry.
@@rahulpandey9472'analog foundry' 😂 I like it
NXG, the goat, the oriGinal pixel counter!!
Great analysis!
Another phenomenal analysis Mike, keep up the great work sir!
Great video, I liked that you addressed the whole 30fps only stuff...
Imagine your surprise later when df turns out to be correct 😂
@@pixelslaughter3492 you mean like how digital foundry was "correct" about A Plague Tale Requiem not being able to 60fps on console?..
Oof@@xOLRxMasterYoda
@xyou know PC fanboys OLRxMasterYoda
I've been saying this for eons...
With enough compromise you can get whatever performance you want in a correctly coded game
Finally 60 fps
just amazing, the ammount of effort required to achieve 60 fps takes a lot of time and goes more than just reduce the resolution.
Depending on the engine my guy lol
@@nguxurr9667 but of course
It's good to see a studio working to improve their optimization to increase the game's overall framerate. They can take what they learned here to give any sequel a visual boost at launch. Hopefully if they have a bigger budget for the next game they can put some money into motion capture for the facial animations, which are a bit stiff, and fall behind what could be achieved last generation. While it's too late to add features like that to this game, I could see them setting this as a goal for the future.
Yeah 6 months later 😂
@@Ryan_tremaine_klarenbach I'm not making excuses for how long the patch took to arrive. They probably waited until all versions for each console (and for PC, graphics card family) were tested and ready to release.
The Series S has its own *special VRAM needs* and holds back development time more than the Series X version. It's poetic justice it is earning the nickname "the Scalebound console".
@@NieR.Amanda they did it on purpose this is Nvidia sponsored title it’s all apart of marketing strategy to push consumers to go out and buy 4090 .. the fact that the previous flagship 3000 series struggle to runs this game at 1080p is laughable ..
@@Ryan_tremaine_klarenbach Makes sense that Digital Foundry don't give an accurate analysis of this game, because they accept sponsorship from Nvidia too... which casts their output regarding anything even marginally connected with that company into doubt. they akso have similar connections with Microsoft and Xbox. They really ought to declare these connections at the start of every video they post. I thought that was in UA-cam's Terms and Conditions?
We just need new consoles. These consoles are severely underpowered at such an early stage of its life cycle
Love your videos, you do a fantastic job. Also great to see a developer properly optimizing for the Series X and it showing its true performance.
I played this day one on gamepass in the 40fps mode it was fantastic no compromises on the visual fidelity either. Idk what it is but 40fps feels incredibly better than 30 still the best way to play it and I wish more games would offer a 40fps mode.
Do you prefer 40 fps locked or unlocked?
Finally a game that shows better performance on series x.
Well, mainstream console spec affordability in mind, regardless the new consoles' CPUs absolutely obliterate the Jaguar CPU cores in all the last-gen consoles, which has provided more 60fps AAA game options than ever before.
Nice 👍
Witcher 3 got another 2gb patch the other day
I gave up on this game half way through my first play-through because it just didn't "feel" right. Now with this new update, the game feels great and I will definitely be finishing it. (Series X).
Great video Michael. I built a PC fearing 30fps was coming but seeing this type of commitment from devs to give us options makes me regret the PC a bit.
It seems Plague Tale: Requiem is a game that loves compute performance more than anything else for performance; RTX 4090s for example have massive gains even over a 3090 Ti (double apparently) in this game.
Absolutely love this game and it’s awesome that it’s still gettting some love.
I completed it at launch with the 40fps mode which was pretty good on Xbox. Now I have rtx 4070ti PC so I need to play it again haha
Awesome, its great to play PS5 games above 60 fps
I've been replaying Plague Tale Requiem in NG+ on PS5 and I originally played the game in 40 FPS. I think the game really benefits from the increased frame rate, even if it isn't a fast-paced action game. It just feels nicer to play, and for those action moments when you do need to get away from an enemy, the reduced input lag feels very nice. Overall, I think the cutbacks they made to get the game to run at a higher FPS are very worthwhile and well done. It's hard to notice them most of the time unless you are specifically going back and forth comparing/looking for them.
I do notice a small reduction in image sharpness (such as in foliage/alpha effects) but overall it's a really, really solid presentation and an incredible achievement by Asobo. The game just looks really good in both modes, and it runs incredibly well now as well. My hat is off to the developers for putting in the effort in making this possible.
you laugh, the lighting details, ambient occlusion, environmental details and shadows take a big hit
Games like this are going to age really well with uncapped frames on future consoles. Curious if the next batch of consoles will run this locked at 120 fps.
Nice video! Are you going to do one for Jedi Survivor ?
I think dude did an analysis of jedi survivor for Ign
@@nowayshay You are correct, Thanks :)
I been paying the game in 60FPS performance mode and notice the NPCs from a distance moving oddly in 30FPS? I have seen similar problems like this from Dark Souls 2 on PS4 and Xbox One at the time. It is a little noticeable.
I gave up for on this on ps5 as the 30fps felt awful after having just played Ragnarok, sonic frontiers and evil west.
May need to start this again after I beat Jedi Survivor
What is the resolution in ps5 performance mode?
that 40 FPS Quality mode is what’s I’ve asking from Xbox. We are the only one who have Low compensation Fram Rate which at 120 mode doubles the frame or if it’s just VRR will look smooth and responsive!
Can the Xbox Series X version be corrected to look faded?
The overall image looks flimsy.
Yeah just lower the gamma setting slightly in the options.
It's good to see progress but I don't think it's where it could be. It's a good looking game but we've seen better settings and performance from better looking games.
My guess is the engine optimisation and maybe GPU optimisation needs work. Don't get me wrong it's nowhere near as bad as other games, but it should be better nonetheless.
Time to break out the 4090 Mike!
What is the resolution i
Both consoles running in performance mode
Processing 😫. I'll check later
Working now, at least for me?
Higher res at 30 fps, in motion, is useless when images are stuttering to see more details anyway.
Res mode is good for photo mode.
60 FPS for the win!
long live to the peasant console king
I'll stick with the 40 fps fidelity mode.
Res mode details won't be visible anyway as the images are stuttering at those fps.
Many think too much of res numbers but don't realize what is mentioned above.
Res mode is better when standing still (photo mode) which invalidates the whole point of video games.
This game is soooo good! Genuinely surprised Microsoft didn't scoop up this studio after Flight Sim. They're top tier.
Great video NX, i think 30 fps is still inevitable at least when the consoles are at the end of their support term. I still wonder how rockstar managed to put rdr 2 on the older consoles with stable performance.
You are plain wrong
@@nguxurr9667 you think in 5 to 6 yrs, the ps5 will have latest aaa games running 60fps? The acceptable standards are 1080p 30fps and as long as it is achievable they will put it on the ps5. If ppl are adamant about more smooth performance then you will get it but at dogshit quality
@@vishaalgargi Rdr 2 has better graphics and performance than GTA 5 on PS4
Your logic is non existence
@@nguxurr9667GTA5 is very CPU demanding, that's why. PS4 has a very bad CPU, that bottlenecks its GPU a lot, making lots of games run bad. RDR2 is more GPU demanding, and it also runs some settings lower than the lowest on PC in order to achieve a stable 30 FPS. GTA5 on PS4 its just has lots of jaggies because of the lack of Anti-Aliasing, but it runs at medium-high settings. RDR2 looks awful when compared to PC, not because of the resolution and the AA, it just looks bad because most settings are on medium and low. I'm sorry to say this but the PS5 and the Xbox Series X will have the same problems. They have a pretty bad CPU too. And in the future, they will probably run most games at 30 FPS with a 1080p or a 1440p resolution. The newer games are already looking like this.
Okay Asobo, where is the 60fps patch for FS2020?
Do you think a possible PS5 Pro would deliver enough performance uplift to have those current 30FPS games reach 60FPS without the devs having to make other compromises?
Yes, all dependant on what a theoretical PS5Pro would Consist of. But once new hardware comes, adding new features and FX is normally what many devs want. But as an easy use of hardware resolution and performance are some of the least involved for new hardware.
I don't see the point of a PS5 Pro.
I do not see a reason for a PS5 Pro to exist. The standard PS5 is plenty powerful enough. Poorly optimized titles are not a sign that better hardware is needed
And even a ps5 pro will have its limits. There won’t be any kind of hardware that guarantees any kind of fixed specs for all games.
@@DeadPhoenix86DP do you see the point in cars with more horsepower than a family sedan?
if u wanna push the consoles to the max u have to go for 30 fps. But that doesnt mean there arent room for cutbacks to make a 60fps mode.
Its the developers decision
You could say the same about PC tho🤷🤷 let's say a Ue5 game even a 4090 would be at its Graphical max potential at 30FPS
@@nguxurr9667 but games are made with the console spec in mind , not the 4090. 4090 or any graphics will never truly be utilized more than bruteforcing console made games
@@dante19890 there is many PC only games 🤷 by your logic even PC would be at its maximum at 30FPS.
@@nguxurr9667 there are basically no new tripple A games today that is built on high end pc first. They are all console ports
@Tulponatix thats incorrect. Consoles are the lead plattform in AAA developement.
Very few games are built on pc first.
A 4090 will really never get maxed since devs arent specifically targeting that card while making a game.
I can now play this game at 60fps on my 1660s with quality preset and low settings on 1080p
low and high have little to no difference
Good work,Mike. I also agree that DF used a good loop hole to promote a video..
30fps should never be a norm.. especially if gaming is apparently moving forward.
Requiem was a good game, too linear though and took little risks in gameplay.. similar to the first game.
I avoided the console versions and went with PC at launch. I was on a 3080 and at 1440p native I was getting a decent run in Balanced DLSS with all bar two graphics options maxed,with only shadows and draw distance at high.
I was getting a solid 60fps capped with some drops in heavy scenes..but that dreaded camera movement still exists, even today. It's like the camera bounces off objects and is distracting.
I currently tried the game on a 4080. Native 4K, maxed out, without any upscaling or frame gen I hit way over 60...throw in frame gen and I've topped over a 100fps at Full 4K...
That console image is completely inferior to a good PC but fair play to the team for making the game perform far better, giving 60fps modes and improving their game. Bit late, but the effort is there for those who never purchased at launch.
Its running 119 fps in resolute modus om my ps5.. i dont know how but my tv says it in the menu
That is just the VRR window reflecting the 120hz container, at that point the game is likely below 48fps so the TV display just reverts to 8ms refresh which is 119.88fps
Quand je vois la vidéo de comparaison, tu as l'impression que ça été réalisé avec 2 TV différentes PS5 (Oled) XSX (LCD) alors que l'on sait que le test a été réalisé avec la même TV.
Les noirs ont l'air plus profonds sur PS5. C'est trop bizarre.
40 with vrr on series s is acceptable
It's good to see an FPS win for Xbox, which will never get credit.....
I gave it the credit, for heavy GPU sections that require Texture fillrate, parallel compute & or Bandwidth the SX should be more performance to 10-15% if utilised fully. The thing is that is hard and is only a % of a games demands along with APIs, experience etc. This is a great update for all players and the team have done well.
Great Video, thanks for speaking Facts about these consoles. Digital Foundry is nothing but a fraud channel, even in their Spider man Remastered video they completely disregarded PS5 running unlocked FPS with Ray Tracing at 90FPS
They never shown this impressive feat
DF went downhill after Alex joined them, most of his analysis now is biased on PCMR BS, the only one who seems to keep the neutrality is Tom. it's a shame though, i like they work since PS3/360 era.
@@Edu-Zer0 PCMR bias? You sounds like a butthurt console fanboy who can't just take in the facts.
We needed DF to call out the gaming industry, we need NX Gamer to call out DF. Everyone wins💟
Call DF out on what? Let's call out NX about having a chip on his shoulder about DF.
@@daibonehead The fact that they are Microsoft shareholders thus having a conflict of interest.
What a BS call. Competition and different views on a topic are crucial to a vital scientific discussion. What NXG and DF are doing is basically science journalism. If you want only one single opinion, there are other countries in the world which fulfill your demand.
@@Wiiillllson151 he works for ign and you think df is more at risk for being biased? My goodness sweet summer child
Why no 60fps mode comparison? Only 40fps and 120fps.
By this logic, why can't then all console games run on low internal resolution (720p, 1080p. etc) and then upscaled to 4k ??? It would hit 60FPS with no problem. If not enough, then lower even more the internal resolution ? Obviously that is not that and having not enough time for development is not an excuse , I think.
Even upscaled the image would look like shit
@@SaberKingofKnights1 Since consoles moved from checkerboarding to FSR it started to look like shit. So for me it is not an excuse . Also they can always do the dynamic resolution . It's all about money now - fast food game industry. They will learn the hard way when people stop buying anything at launch .
@@ivofixzone6410Consoles still use checkerboard rendering on some games. The difference here is that the internal and original resolutions of the games are so low. BTW: Upscaling is totally different from FSR and Checkerboard.
Weird that he talks about the gamma differences. Having uncalibrated gamma is not inferior, you just have not calibrated it...
He even left the XsX with a higher gamma levels.. how dumb. Why give the appearance of a ps5 advantage... Makes him look like a PS5 fanboy.
The PS5 version looks way better in my opinion though. It has darker blacks and colors to boot.
This is a game you play for visuals and 30 or even more so 40fps is perfectly fine. Man that Xbox gamma ruins the game
30fps no thanks! On switch I can compromise with 30 but don't give me any bs about ps5/Xbox series stuck at 30 fps!
Is is not 120 fps is it 60 fps on ps5 and Xbox series
If you have a vrr compatible monitor/tv you can play with 120fps
why they cut the graphics so much? why optimising for 80-90fps? i know about headroom,but still. not ideal.
As someone with a vrr tv- very happy.
Because you need to make sure you have enough head room to meet a close or locked 60fps. You can't account for all drops so having the average FPS higher really helps
it's for the incoming PS5 Pro
@@Crimsongz There won't be a PS5 pro
Forget the res numbers and experience for yourselves.
Noone pauses and zooms images to count pixels. At 30 fps images are stuttering anyway to see a higher res. Framerate is always visible because games images need to move. It's not photo mode.
Weird callout on digital foundry especially given you purposefully misconstrue their point and imply they say something they don't.
I know it's important to you that you're right and you're angry that you feel like you deserve their success but very disappointing to see you trying to do that.
Digital foundry always implying that it's devs choice and time and money are main factor for 60 fps.
And they're absolutely correct in saying that 30 fps is coming back and especially any game pushing the envelope and crossgen is biggest current factor for 60 fps
Turned off the video as soon as I saw that part.
Yet games run 120FPS 🤷🤣 60-120FPS is PS5 standard
On pc this game only uses 3 to 4 GB vram and ram usage is very low that is why performance is better on series X it has 10gb ram with 560gbs bandwidth
So xbox completely destroy ps5 on 120 fps mode but no one will talk about it
Shhhhhhhh
I'm a PS5 player and I respect seeing Xbox Series X perform, I only have problem with the Series S potato holding back next gen
@@nguxurr9667 not sure of that ..still no sfs used in game and it litterally use half de memory needed AT LEAST sometime even divide by 4. If it was used i would agreed with you 100% but for now it's all about dev lazyness
@@nguxurr9667 so low to mid end PC's are holding back the gen too right?
@@SlimCargo sort of , PS5 and XSX both have GPU better than RTX 2080Super + dedicated compression (in PS5 a extreme case) + Both have access to more than 12gb vram.
I played the trial, after hfw it didnt do alot for me. Slow gameplay and meh graphics, (amazing if you game on xbox)
Lol @ Micheal with his "hypothetical" API issues with the PS5.
Great analysis as usual but isn't the whole 30fps discussion because we were told we would get 4k 60fps for this generation, but in order to get 60fps and above sacrifices are having to be made in a lot of games in order to hit that 60fps target and so we get either 4k 30fps or we get sub 4k with other visuals stripped back, in this case 1080p upscaled for performance mode. I really don't think this generation will be able to hit 4k 60 with RTX reflections\GI etc with any consistency. Now whether thats down to the hardware or the devs optimisation is another question.
Native 4k res is absolutely useless. Why do you need that? On pc majority uses upsampling.
4k native 60 fps with rt is not even possible on the most powerful pc gpu yet, you need upscaling and fake frames to reach it
Wow series x finally won a comparison 😂
🤣
Series x has won way more comparisons than this
@@unknownsoldier6731 err no not way more
Also Dead space remake and witcher 3 next gen upgrade comparisons favor series x. Ps5 won Hogwarts, Callisto,re4 remake from aaa recent games. What's interesting imo is which console handles ray tracing better and while on paper series x in that area is clearly faster the ps5 can handle ray tracing equally as good and implement phenomenal results for a 10tflops console(ratchet and clank rift apart i.e). Imo API on PS5 is way better and easier to optimize games than on series x
Ps5 pro is needed so bad and this is proof
Of course PS5 2020 is outdated already
XSX and PS5 being pushed as hard as they can right now lol
Not even 😂
PC fanboys are mad
Its a good turn out and unexpected. I say that as a 7900xt PC owner.
Calling out DF and claiming that they’re being naive is not the most professional way to state that you have a difference of opinion on the 30fps debate. Pretty disappointing honestly.
It’s interesting to hear a different stance on the situation but that doesn’t make the other side any less valid. Yes IF a dev targets 60fps when making a game they can of course hit it by making the right concessions, but many devs and publishers care more about a pretty game than a performant game so it’s a pretty big if. As cross gen becomes less the norm, it is reasonable to think that more devs will favour graphics over performance.
Nope, Michael is right. When someone with such relevance make this kind of statements, they had to be called out, because they "opinions" make the public mind about certain topics.
@@Edu-Zer0 I’m not saying he’s right or wrong. Just that there is a more professional way to present his perspective. Here he comes across with an attitude of superiority, but there is room for both arguments and both make valid points. DF never stated their view as the be all and end all, Michael shouldn’t presume as such.
I am not calling anyone "out", I only used DF as an example and nothing more. My point is not one of superiority, but one of experience. Thinking or talking in absolutes, which the internet does all the time, is not in anyway accurate or helpful. The point made is games will continue to be delivered on what they always have been, the aims, budget, skills and cost of the teams. Hardware limits just factor into the same old triple constraints.
I still agree with DF more in this regard when we are continuously looking at games that run at 648p or 720p and still struggling to hold 60 fps.
@@NXGamer I appreciate that you do have the experience, so you’re points are well informed. It did feel as though you were coming across as if you know better, but maybe that’s just my perception. Again I think both you and DF make valid points, but I didn’t feel that DF were talking in absolutes, just giving their perspective on an issue that many gamers are concerned about.
If rats update at half rate then it's not a true 60 FPS. Even Nvidia's fake frames would be truer
DF 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
When this game launched I immediately said that it was unacceptable for a game of this era to launch locked at 30fps. 60fps IS the norm now, and there is an incredibly significant difference between the 2 frame rates. I suppose it's nice to see the devs update the game. However, it should have launched like this and there's no excuse that justifies why it didn't. Developers should not be sacrificing performance for resolution, or other "quality" gimmicks.
Exactly, we didn't sign up to play pretty PowerPoint slideshows.
60fps is more common in console games now, but it is still up to the devs if they want to target that performance level. If the devs want to achieve a prettier looking game and it means sacrificing frame rate, that's their call. It is a console afterall and is finite and fixed in its power. You want 60fps all the time or higher, there's a reason PC is an option. You can't have it all 🤷♂️
I prefer 40 fps on series x vs 60 as the drop in visual quality in 60 is highly noticeably. 40fps feels really great thanks to vrr And Optional motion blur. The game is stunning
40fps for the win!
60 is!
Noone pauses and zooms to count pixels.
At 40 fps images are stuttering anyway to observe any higher res. mode.
the patch is garbage, a lot of stutter in 60 fps.
Once again the decision to not play a game on launch pays off. Will give this a go on Gamepass tonight
30fps is back when naughty dog blows us away, then the community complains for 60fps. Quality gets reduced to fit a 60fps mode, then 30fps no longer back. I think I'm willing to sacrifice the consoles 60fps to see what developers could do with modern hardware besides ray tracing, hear me out Rockstar
Simple solution: 40 fps 👍
When in motion, at 30 fps images are stuttering to see higher res anyway.
Res mode is good for photo mode, when standing still, which nobody starts game for it.
RTX 4090 runs this game great.
7900xt too
Xbox gave them Gamepass money to make the series x better 😂
Doubt it
Don’t think so. They have a lot of experience with Pc and direct X in general. Furthermore the engine seems to utilize the architecture of the series X better as the ps5.
Not the end of the world here.
Happy to have the 60 fps now.
Yeah, burning shores is a much better game graphically and runs like a dream!👍
MS should buy this studio, they have talented programmers that can work around the bottlenecks series x has that ps5 doesnt and take advantage of the more powerful gpu/cpu.
Problem becomes then, Microsoft is probably going to want their games to go exclusive to the Xbox eco-system.
Nonsense 😑
Bottlenecks ???
What are you talking about. NX has clearly said that Asobo are used to DX12 and xbox Api and know how to properly develop their games on it as they already have a great experience with MS flight simulator. This xbox advantage would keep happening if every studio decided to give priority to xbo api over ps5's .
Where is the bottleneck narrative you trying to bring here ?
Xbox series x destroys ps5 when properly used by devs.... There you go ponies
Unlimited power Ps5 in Next Gen games 1080p scaled up to 1440p by TAAU Low setting to hit 60 fps xD on my RTX4080 I play in this game in 4k DLSS quality max (image look better than native 4k) Ultra quality with RT and I have 120 fps
Touch Grass
I am running the same with reshade installed on top and the console version looks like a joke. It's not even remotely close, though it's fine for what it is delivering being a toy for kids.
@@rahulpandey9472 yep i been many years console player, but lack of performance etc. On consoles push me to buy a Top tier PC so 2 month ago i buy pc for gaming with rtx4080+core i7 13 gen and 32 gb ddr5 6000 mhz memory with ssd pcie 4.0 speed 7100 mb/s so now i have next gen experience! 4k max setting max RT and way above 60fps smooth gameplay. Ps5 now for me is only for exclusive games!
Well, I have an RX6950XT and I can already max out the game and runs much better than consoles, the game on an RTX4080 should be awesome.
This is exactly why Sony doesn't trust Microsoft with Activision Blizzard, look how they artificially made the PS5 slower in this game
A plague tale requiem is a 3rd party game ... Stop the fake narrative you little pony
They didn't ... NX gamer clearly said the game was built primarily on the xbox API using DX12 which allows to take full advantage of the xbox power ... This is a dev choice and no one else is involved .
The result you see here should be the standard for every game as the series x is more powerful than ps5. But because most of the devs build for ps5 API and port it to xbox , it makes ponies like you think that ps5 is the better piece of hardware .
This has nothing to do with Microsoft, the team have delivered well on all formats and these updates are great for everyone.
XBOX is like monster...
You a z-z-z-zoomer? Because we've been through this cycle time and time again. DF are correct. Way more 30fps games will be coming once last gen is finally dropped, and thinking that devs will later update their games with 60fps+ modes is extremely naïve. Devs will almost always target graphics over performance, and "budget and time" are only getting tighter. Talent and critical thinking is also vanishing thanks to the backwards woke agenda infecting so many studios. The state of AAA releases in recent years, especially this year, is an absolute joke. Updates as seen here are far from the norm. I still expect this gen to have more 60fps games overall thanks to these consoles actually having decent CPU's this time, but frame rates will go downhill in the next 18 months.
PS5 is 60-120FPS until PS6, cry about it
Tf are you talking about. Games been getting stomped for 30fps. Developers ain't dumb
@@nguxurr9667 Meanwhile gotham knights is 30 fps, forspoken 720p sub 60 fps, and Jedi Survivor, is 648p sub 60 fps. Are you sure about PS5 being a 60-120 fps console?
@@rahulpandey9472Gotham Knights is a scam
What is the resolution on performance mode on ps5?
1080р.
1080p rendering upscaled the 1440p
@@user-sp8fi2zv2v1080p upscaled to 1440p.