Told in Stone and History for Granite are the real deal, one for Rome, the other for Egypt, short videos filled with information, to the point and well documented. Really appreciate the history lessons!
This is a brilliant channel. Excellent narration, and smooth transitions in the editing which I believe is best to use to help get a point across. Well done. Very informative and most certainly makes one think about such amazing structures!
I started watching a video on Egypt and it was some guy in his kitchen, (I stopped watching)even if you're the best Egyptologist I need some level of presentation, I agree with your assessment.
Can anybody refer me to a good study containing research of this type? I'm not having any luck in online searching but I'm assuming somebody MUST have gone looking for the robbed stone, so I'm probably just using the wrong search terms? Pyramid casing stones might be harder to identify as reused masonry than Roman stone, I assume (less likely to have inscriptions all over them), but the size, quality and polish of the tura limestone blocks should surely still be identifiable even when incorporated into new structures...?
Finally someone who knows which pyramid is the Great Pyramid. So many get it wrong, and I am not just talking UA-camrs, but PBS, the Discovery Channel conglomerate, even news channels or programs. I am so glad I did not have to yell at my computer "THAT IS NOT THE GREAT PYRAMID!!!"
I just found your channel through the UA-cam recommendations. Great videos! In both content and quality. I love learning about the pyramids and am looking forward to new videos. Thanks and good luck!
Studying ancient Egypt has been a hobby of mine for many years, and your observations and hypotheses of this wonderful culture are the most sensible and insightful I have seen.
@@DalHrusk Points of higher elevation tend to catch the sunlight first as the sun rises because as the sun is coming up, lower parts are still behind the shadow of the planet. Same thing happens in reverse during a sunset. So there was probably a time during dawn and dust when the golden top would have been brightly illuminated while the rest of the pyramid was in umbra
In moonlight, possibly, but not at sunset or sunrise. This because the angle would always reflect light upwards, and never downwards. That can only happen when the light source is above a pyramid - as the moon can be.
anyone who has built anything knows that things look good the day they are delivered, then after a few weeks / months years, it starts looking like crap unless you do regular maintenance, which nobody does
It's fascinating that the bent pyramid is so often derided by Egyptologists as a "failed" project, when its construction method was so much more resistant to damage-over-time than the later pyramids!
Yea, another of history's lies. Although I also think that the state of the world's climate during construction was integral in each pyramids design. Vapor canopy/heliolithic
Yes but no. There were at least 2 things that made the difference, and IMHO mostly related to the ease of removing casing stones duing the middle ages: #1. The less tightly packed arrangement ironically caused fewer casing stones to come loose during bad earthquakes, making it harder to get them down from the pyramid itslef. #2. The greater distance from the river Nile made transporting stones from the site itself far more difficult than it would have been when the pyramid was originally built along the now dried up Ahramat branch of the river.
@@thomascampbell7407 Wouldn’t call it a lie, people have been trying to elucidate why there was an interim design form, that was replaced by another, in a very short period of time. Some think it was for structural stability, others for esthetic reasons. What bad motivation would there be for a person to attempt to deceive others regarding such a point?
@@thomascampbell7407 Wouldn’t call it a lie, people have been trying to elucidate why there was an interim design form, that was replaced by another, in a very short period of time. Some think it was for structural stability, others for esthetic reasons. What bad motivation would there be for a person to attempt to deceive others regarding such a point?
@@thomascampbell7407 Wouldn’t call it a lie, people have been trying to elucidate why there was an interim design form, that was replaced by another, in a very short period of time. Some think it was for structural stability, others for esthetic reasons. What bad motivation would there be for a person to attempt to deceive others regarding such a point?
When my friend had a huge granite slab installed in his kitchen as a counter top...It took the installers a huge amount of effort to get it plumb. In other words this slab was cut with two flat surfaces. And it took the workers most of the day to get it level so it could support any type of load that may be required in a kitchen. Now the paving stones they used to level the bottom support layer that the Great Pyramid was built on, have the top side flat, and the bottoms are contoured to fit the natural terrain. That is amazing to think about.
@The Great Gazoo exactly. People today to give so little credit to these ancient civilisations. They were amazing at what they did and we haven't got a clue how they did, that's it.
@The Great Gazoo I still wonder how they managed to be so precise yet effective with their stonework. I feel like they must have had really advanced tools than what we thought
I had granite installed. They put the flat blocks on my plumb cabinets. I don't understand why anyone would have cabinets with uneven tops. The wall behind was all kinds of uneven. 🤷♂️
@@noahallvall8562 No need for very advanced tools. Experience, knowledge and craftsmanship paired with plentiful workforce can do amazing thing. That said, most masonry in the pyramids is quite irregular and show that they didn't waste much time quarrying the stone which is a good old trick hat was still in used until the early 20th. You put efforts on finishing the casing, but the rest is done with "lower" standards to make it efficient and cost effective.
Excellent video! It never occurred to me that the blinding glare from the white limestone would completely ruin the effect of a possible golden pyramidion, but it makes perfect sense now that you mention it! Thanks!
Hi, welcome to UA-cam Pyramide ;-) Loved your first videos, well documented with photos and videos. Contrarily to some comments I’ve seen (get used to it) I love seeing people using their own brain and common sense to come up with hypothesis ! After all Egyptologists did the same until only recently with more scientific methodologies. So keep up popping vids out. This one on pyramiding was super informative, and made a lot of sense … Cheers
Love your channel! I would love to see a video about what happened to the majority of the casing stones. I've heard that there was a major earthquake in the 1300's that caused most of them to loosen or fall down, and the people of Cairo used a lot of them to rebuild. It would be interesting to see some of the buildings that were repaired using the casing stones.
@oldmetalhead1 Yes, has anybody done any documentary work tracing the former coping-stones' current locations, presumably now incorporated within older buildings of Cairo & other surrounding towns? We see a lot of robbed Roman/pre-Henrician stone clearly visible in old English churches & similar, so presumably one can see something similar when walking the streets of modern Egyptian cities' "old quarters". Would be intriguing to see what era of structure it turns up in most, & whether it was reworked for greater decorativeness there, or just left as worked-but-plain blocks?
Watched them all. Lovely. Calm, rational, logical, common sense, open to valid differing interpretations... and.. a human voice, unless your AI voice replicator has gotten so real. I hope it's you. Thanks so much. ANy other vids in the same vein will be watched by me. THANKS .
I too, was just introduced to ur channel today and have of course subscribed to this channel because well the only reason I need and that being you sir actually bring ALL questions, statements, most egyptologist bullshit answers and real life conclusions into the video and leave the viewer to gain their own understanding all the while telling ur reasons for y or y not. Definite subscriber till the end, keep up the great work
Do you plan on making a dedicated video on the Black Pyramid? I think it looks really fascinating, and I hear the substructure is pretty complex despite the mostly ruined superstructure
Thanks for new footage and close-up views. It is amazing how many stones are skewed out of position. I believe the Giza pyramids are pre-Dynastic, as they are devoid of hieroglyphics, and are probably thousands of years older than they are currently dated. No point in having hieroglyphics carved in a capstone, when it could never be seen from ground level!
Actually according to eyewitness accounts the pyramids were covered with hieroglyphics. That is why sometimes when a building in Cairo gets renovated they find hieroglyphics on the inside the wall side of the stones.
They cant date the Sphinx but they can date the pyramids because the mortar used in the construction contains biological material that can be carbon dated...They are not older but the Sphinx must be.
I have long wondered about the casing stones----if they were removed in the last several centuries, are there any records of that happening? And any known reuse for these stones? I think you said in a recent video that this type of limestone is soft, relatively speaking, when first cut, so why go to the bother of recovering the casing stones and recutting them vs just digging out new blocks? Great channel.
Awesome content, thank you! I've loosely followed most of the discoveries about the pyramids over a few decades and i think this content has generated my first solid question. if the pyramids were covered in gleaming white stone, would the sun-side even be safely approachable (heat, light and glare) and are there any other structures in the path of this reflection? it would seem that there wouldnt be any structures as it would be too uncomfortable to occupy anything too close to this heat source.
I think the heat would be relatively equal on all sides, but you do make a good point that most pyramid related structures were built on the eastern and northern sides, where the glare would be the least bothersome.
Yes,,,,never thought of that aspect..like in the city,next to glass covered buildings the glare is also heat reflection...burning anything in its path..!...wow....even more mystery.....this vid is great content...tnx,
One of the issues we see in dome building is thermal expansion along a single line closest to the sun as it arcs across the sky. I believe you'd see the same effect on the solar sides, but spread more evenly across the entire stone surface. I like where you're going, I had similar ideas about where the shadows would fall.
Thanks for these great videos about the pyramids. They are way better than most in every way. Hope you will keep making them. Are you in Egypt now? I was out at Menkaure for a few hours yesterday admiring the granite casing stones, inspired by your video about them. I didn't see you around! I sat on the bottom coarse and leaned my head back against the stone and closed my eyes and placed my palms against the granite on either side of me and I felt like a battery on a charger. It's like the pyramids have a charge or something. It's electric. I find the energy on the necropolis very palpable. Thanks again for these superb videos. Newest subscriber. Salam.
The energy you describe is amazing. Here’s aspect no one seems to mention because of all the attention on what the pyramids looked like during the day: Imagine the reflection coming off white granite on brilliant nights or various moon stages. Would that energy have flowed differently? I would love to see a video of whether it reflected light into the surrounding area & how bright that light was at different times.
@@TimPerfetto Possible for the experienced individual, but highly improbable for large numbers of workers carrying tools and super heavy materials and all working closely together. So, yeah, that's part of my dilemma. I have been assuming that they worked from the top down while applying the outer limestone skin.
@@MoAndAye WTF are you talking about? To "beg the question" is to attempt to support a claim with a premise that itself restates or presupposes the claim. It is an attempt to prove a proposition while simultaneously taking the proposition for granted. Jesus Christ stop using this incorrectly for the love of god
Hello, I really enjoy your channel, you have unique perspectives and eye opening insights. Rather than thinking about the perspective of those on the ground, consider the Ariel view. The missing portion of the great pyramid is about 9 meters, approximately 30 feet. If it was gold, the sun would have shined onto it, and the white walls of the pyramid would have created a 750 foot square back drop, which the golden peak would be reflected. Now consider the sides of the pyramid are split and slightly concaved, each half of each face would reflect light towards its opposite half, creating a crossed over double enhanced reflection of light. I have done a reflective analysis on how it would have reflected the sun, and have concluded that each of the four corners would have blasted out quadruped beams of reflection, while the centers of the four split lines would have emitted double rays of reflected sunlight. And if you draw this out as I have, you will end up with the same image we get from stars, a bright center with eight points of light. Also, with having the whole structure ontop of the white desert sand, the reflections from the great pyramid would have shot out for many miles, making it totally visible from space. Now when you consider that Gold reflects the color Red, from outer space the great pyramid would have shined like a blazing red star in the night sky, precisely like Betelgeuse, which in my opinion, is a planet with its pyramids still intact.
Something more catastrophic, they their is glass near by everywhere in the sand, and the stone statues and structures are literally melted/burnt, earthquakes don’t do that, solar flares do.
@Roman Pontian I was multitasking and didn’t use the correct terminology, but since you wanna get all smart ass like I won’t bother, go look up bright insight on the lost capital of Egypt and other of his videos, and go look up brien forester , they both have concrete evidence on something major happened with extreme heat.
@@AdriansCreatures relax, and share ideas. For solar flare activity lookup, suspicious 0bserver, the o on Observer is a zero. There's also several dendrochronologist that are showing a major CME impact around every Thousand Years. Major solar flare activity might also solve the heat Paradox of the ice caps melting can bring us out of the last ice age.
Wow this the first time I see such an excellent narration about the pyramids from a historic objective view (none of that UFO crap). I really enjoy it. 👍
The "UFO crap" doesnt depict Alien spacecraft lifting objects, it depicts a higher intelligenct civilisation from this world or another, that shared technological advances we have not yet found evidence of, to help them build things like these. Have a look at these stones carvings and all around the world, not just Egypt. Imagine yourself carving or moving these stones without machinery. Its very difficult for the intelligent mind to fathom how such perfection can be created, without some form of more advanced engineering compared to the "mainstream" thinking that civilisations back then were much dumber than us. Its hard to trust any Egyptoligist because they seem to all be biased to the culture rather than willing to believe a variation from their own "true" belief, exactly like religions such as Christianity who roned the world saying their religion is correct and will kill anyone who stands in the way. Open minds are what bring truth to the real situations. If we all have closed minds about things we do not understand, there is no way of advancing ourselves. An exmaple would be how everyone centuries ago believed the world was flat, then when some said its curved and we wont fall off the earth, those people were shunned and ridiculed, only because they didnt travel as far and so could not imagine it. The same goes for religions around the world. Although religions are all different, there has to be a reason why so many civilisations have a religion in the first place. A BASE course of these thinkings and beliefs would have began somewhere in history which we cannot know of yet. Its not about are aliens real or not, its about being able to have an open mind to things we could not think of or believe.
@@Lemon83166 Ancient civilizations had a lot of technological advances none of had anything to do with extraterrestrial from other worlds,' by the way nobody in antiquity ever said that the Earth was flat they knew better than that. The Romans connected an entire continent with a network of aqueducts and highways, It's the ufologist that say these people were too stupid to achieve what they did unless they were helped by somebody.
Like a glass skyscraper. The sun reflected may melt your car. Something else went on the dazzling sunlight white stone could be seen for miles and yet somehow desert glass shows up
@@brendawilliams8062why you comparing 2 different surfaces? Yes they both reflect but limestone reflects randomly which would mean it would be a lot less blinding than glass would be.
I would love to hear your take on all the sacred geometry including so many astronomical and global measurements built into the Great Pyramid. Randall Carlsons 2 hr After Skool video explains it in much detail. Great channel, continued success.
@Dan Paulson no i dont bother using reasoning with smartasses, just call them out on their stupidity, good luck with your childrens stories, is that how u lure them into the van? Try candy.
At last, a channel that deals with ancient architecture with a scientific approach: observations, recontextualizations, references to published studies, far from fantasies ! Regarding the implementation of the Kephren pyramid, it may be surprising to see that a layer of less cohesive material is inserted between the structural core and the white limestone coating, weakening the facades. But that would be explained by the order of construction of these three works : the structural core is first built with well-adjusted blocks, then the facing blocks are placed on the periphery of each course, and before moving on to the next layer, the interstice with the core is filled with blocks adjusted as best as possible, but probably never perfectly (work in constrained space, no possibility of removing a failed block) and perhaps a little smaller. This protocol would work as well in the case of a core built first, then dressed from below, as in the case of a progressive construction layer by layer.
I highly recommand this lecture from a searcher from Harvard about the top part of Kufu's pyramid : ua-cam.com/video/eku9o_q9OA4/v-deo.html&ab_channel=HarvardMuseumoftheAncientNearEast (from 48'10'')
The pyramids have been extensively carbon-dated - the mortar that binds blocks was made in wood-burning fires that left residue. Also numerous pyramids have original wood within them, including Djoser, Meidum, Bent and the Great Pyramid (in the shafts). There's a margin of error to push the dates back a few hundred years, but not much more unless all the carbon dating is wrong.
@@glennmorris25 I heard this recently. The pyramids were actually smaller and some think all they did was expand on it. Prob is the relieving chambers were not entered till the 1800s. Yes some people think the graffiti is fake. It is a interesting theory but it crumbles if the graffiti is proved to be authentic. My question is why are they taking so long to see behind the doors in the 2 shafts? They entered on but refuse to continue. Why? Not enough room for a hidden chamber. Seems odd they found doors and stopped.
@@HistoryforGRANITE But surely the wood that was found in the shafts could have been put there at any time in the past, that doesn’t prove the age of the structure, it just proves the age of the wood found and that goes for the mortar, like the repairs done to the Sphinx etc.
@@MURD3RWAVE yes why haven't they? Further, my questions are, how did the builders construct the most sophisticated pyramids without seemingly any real precursor to the design and then subsequent pyramids were of smaller simpler design? For such momentous constructions as the Giza pyramids, why is there no real written evidence of there construction or celebration? After all, the Egyptians were prolifict hieroglyph writers in stone, yielding valuable information relied on and used by modern historians to build a picture of Egyptian history. Why, (as I understand it) were the Egyptians repairing the Sphinx around the time it was supposed to be being built? For my money, these magnificent constructions were created in a much earlier time and recommissioned by a later civilisation.
@@mrmanch204 From what I read it was noted a few times in the past records the Great Pyramid did a hieroglyphics on it. In fact a lot. The first few courses apparently had lots of hieroglyphics on the casing stones. One of the historians wrote he did not know what it said but the locals said it was how much food and payment it cost the king to build. Lost to history. I'm sure it gave all the info on how it was built. For who. The cost and time. People say they never wrote anything about it. Well chances are they absolutely did. The casing stones crumbled or were stolen. Same with claims the queens chamber had a granite floor, hieroglyphs on the ceiling and a sarcophagus like the Kings chamber. All lost through time with looters and old religious nutters. One of those things that people in the Alt history crowd ignore. The pyramid did have info on it. I imagine they wrote how proud they were and who it was for on it. No need to write on papyrus. They thought the pyramid would be eternal. They probably wrote everything about it on the actual pyramid. I believe 2 or 3 old historians wrote about it. In fact one the missing journals of a historian supposedly copied what was written on it. People are actually searching for the lost journal. I came to the conclusion that we will never ever all totally agree how it was done. You can look this stuff up. I have a hard time with remembering the Muslim and Greek names.
The builders of Stonehenge - knew as long as the stones remained the information would be carried. What is now a ruin - was once a magnificent building! Your channel is groundbreaking genius - keep up the amazing work!
I agree with everything you've said but you should also take into account that in case of golden piramidion, during sunrise, when sun rays would hit the piramidion first, it would create a spectacular show. The same goes for sunset and last rays of the day.
Only the first bottom course was granite for Khafre. Menkaure had 16 courses, which may have been the record. Later pyramids in the 5th/6th dynasty would often have 1 course of granite as well.
@@HistoryforGRANITE Using precisely cut granite would have been a status point of considerable effect since the granite would be significantly harder to work than limestone or marble. Even so, granite is easier to shape than most "theorists" imagine.
@@marktyler3381 The "pounding stones" "method" can easily shape granite. Only an idiot would try to use copper to do so. The Egyptians were not idiots.
Excellent. I love granite. ...... My family owned tin mines, and the biggest tin smelter, in Cornwall, England, and West Cornwall is granite. ...... My great-grandfather built 2 granite country houses, one in Cornwall, one in Devon, around 1905 - all cut granite. ...... I really appreciate the craftsmanship it takes to cut stone, having occasionally wielded a chisel on granite myself.
@@TimPerfetto I should have written 'West Penwith is granite' as not all of west Cornwall is granite. / You wrote 'Tin is 12 times stronger than granite'. To crush? / You wrote 'My family invented the USB protocol'. Cool. My father never told me - probably did not know - that my great-grandfather invented the Wilmot Automatic Transmitter, which was effectively the computer router of the telegraph cables, when he was Superintendent of Waterville Cable Station in Ireland. Amazing what one can find out on Google!
Has anyone ever done a video of all the differences inside & out between the two largest pyramids on the Giza Plateau, we know the great pyramid has a horizontal line & slight indentation down each face but other than that & what do we currently know about each one internally, what I’m trying to suggest is could it be possible that the Great Pyramid is much older, it has sea fossils at its base etc does the 2nd ? maybe the 2nd was built to copy the Great & they tried to make the 2nd appear better/grander than the Great due to it being built higher ground? That’s why they are the most fascinating structures on earth because there are so many unanswered questions.
They are scam artisits who have made millions selling books and will do anything to keep their lies going, thats why they will ne asking the questions they have been for 20 years for another 20 years because answering anything will not benefit them. "We have taken samples for testing" - three years later you hear nothing from their samples, they dont follow science. Brian forester said he discovered magnetite, lol
The gilded pyramidion is in emulation of the sun and solar rays. It is meant to be visible from far away, not looking up from the base. I think your theory is not considering this effect
Very interesting. There are many ancient megalithic structures that have specific orientations such that the light of the sun (or the moon, or a star) illuminates a specific feature of the structure to mark a specific day and time of the year - usually solstices and equinoxes. IF such an arrangement was in use in Egypt, people would not have had to look at it every day, just on those days of importance. On those occasions, the first instant of light flashing off of a pyramidion would be important for marking the event. Of course, any highly polished surface, such as black granite, might produce the same effect, leaving open the possibility that if they were gilded it was probably intended as a statement of wealth and power. 'Gilding the lily', so to speak.(LOL) Do you suppose this dark basalt pyramidion concept is related to the existence of the 'stained' stone on top of the Great Pyramid?
It's difficult to connect the dark pyramidions of the Middle Kingdom to the 4th dynasty because it's a huge gap in time, but it's certainly possible. What we really need is a proper forensic examination of the stained stone as a starting point for what to think of it.
My understanding is that the exteriors of the pyramids at Giza were intact (other than the so-called "robber's tunnel") until around the 12th or 13th centuries or thereabouts, when a massive earthquake loosened them up and made quarrying them feasible. The earthquake apparently also flattened Cairo, thus creating a large demand for stone for rebuilding. If this is true, then the pyramids would have withstood the thermal expansion for millennia with no visible damage. It's possible that the builders had some mechanism that we don't understand for dealing with it.
Oh, imagine going back in time to see the pyramids in their original glory. They are incredible now but they would have been utterly magnificent. The medieval builders of cathedrals in Europe sort to amaze the peasants with the absolute glory of god, and anyone living today is moved by the architecture when stepping into one. Just think what the average peasant or foreigner to Egypt all those years ago thought upon first sight of these incredible buildings. I absolutely loved visiting Egypt and I hope I can get there again before I die so as to see all these wonders of humanity .
I can't count the number of times I have been the one to first tell someone about how the limestone would have glistened in the sunlight. Often the look on their faces as they imagine it is simply great. I really don't understand why this isn't one of the basic facts that everyone knows. Sure, I am a history nerd who has listened to more hours of lecture on various bits of history than I can count but Egypt is more of a peripheral interest of mine so its not as if I have tons of detailed knowledge on the subject of pre-Ptolemaic Egypt. (2 guesses where I focus my attention for the ancient world)
@@MrBottlecapBill Yeah, but there are plenty of bright gleaming white that should NOT be there. Think all of those older depictions of the Greco-Roman world due to all the paint that was once covering things, weathering into oblivion. One could go a step further and cry foul at Kurosawa and his color coded armies in Ran. Or hell the green/chain grey/plate aesthetic of Rohan and Gondor. Point being: sometimes it works, other times it is the opposite of reality but still works, other times it causes your brain to leak out of your ear but is a known trope so gl dealing with that mess.
@@whyjnot420 It's easy to deal with. It's just nobody in hollywood cares to. A minor bit of research from writers and on set experts is all it takes. That's always been too much to ask it seems.
@@MrBottlecapBill That only tells a portion of the story, a big portion, but still only a portion. Another big part of it is audience expectation. If a certain trope is what people expect, regardless of its historical authenticity, changing it to something the audience does not expect in order to bring in something that is historically authentic, actually relies on suspension of disbelief to some extent and thus it is easier to _not_ change the trope.
I would run a simulation to check the appearance of each pyramid at sunrise/sunset/night. We just don't know what the ancient deemed pleasing to the eye, we don't even know if the pyramidions had anything to do with a visual experience at all. For example, in medieval Italian churches there are countless examples of small paintings hung very high, making it impossible to notice any detail in them: experiencing the art was not as important as feeling its presence.
Great Pyramid was covered in white dolomite, not lime stone. It did have a gold top. When viewed from the top, you notice it has 8 sides, as a slight indentation at the center for the 4 sides. It had wiring inside & flowed a river beneath, as a sort of conduit. Giant charging stations!
There is no evidence that any pyramid had a gold on the top that’s just an urban myth, so is the one about the pyramids being covered with hieroglyphs, they are just not true.
@@thorncraft3235 That's an opinion, not a fact. You can't really prove nor disprove it. Of course there are pyramids below Giza as well that were found & really ancient ones underground in what you would call middle-earth.
@@adriennemarierozario6591 you stated it as fact, you said “It did have a gold top”. Yet there has never been any evidence of a gold top & that is a fact. Or wiring inside, I don’t believe what I’m told in videos I prefer evidence & there is none the ‘power station theory’ is just that a Theory & nothing else, believe what you like but science tells you to follow the evidence. I do believe there are things on the Giza Plateau that can not be explained by mainstream academics like drill holes and precision carvings of extremely hard stone that could not have been done with copper chisels so there must of been either tools they had then that have not been found due to the metal being taken & repurposed or them objects are from a previous civilisation that predates all Egyptian history and it originally came from what the Egyptians themselves call Zep Tepe, but no one knows for sure, more evidence is needed.
Except that there is no reason to think that they used any electricity. I think they'd have used something more effective than swords, spears, and horse drawn chariots eventually if they had knowk dge of electricity. And their rival nations would have used electricity also.
The context of temperature and climate supposed (vis a vis thermal expansion and sunlight glare) suggests the current desert weather was the dominant atmospheric conditions when perhaps instead more temperate weather conditions might have have been the case, consistent with a paleo-climate of the pre-Younger Dryas which is becoming an increasingly likely environment for the pyramids’ construction.
Considering the high degree of precise engineering and execution, there were no mistakes made in this project. The white casing could have also been expected to reflect away the sun's radiation and so preserve the monument from heating and thermal cycling. If there had been a gilded cap, it could have served as a mirror for signaling from a ground based emitter.
@@matmul4850 You would think that anyone who builds a very high structure (at considerable expense) would use it as a lookout (to see if friends, enemies or storms are coming) and then would use this expensive creation for a practical purpose such as to signal by light (maybe at night) in a system for communication of disaster protocols (what to do if an attack or a storm occurs or maybe other news).
@@robertsmyk4102no need for such a high and expensive look out. Looking that far sounds useless anyhow. Nobody can see anything that far away. Also, no evidence that it could have been used as a look out.
There is no way this pyramid was built in one Pharaoh's lifetime. The length of time to place the stones and the amount of time it would take to cut the stones out of the quarry using even today's fastest methods
In short no one knows why the Egyptian Pyramids were built. Anything in them was taken out. The theories range from weird or crazy, burial tombs, water pumps, nuclear reactors or space aliens. I read many of the theories the chemical complex chemical reactor seems the most realistic. The most basic question is what it is and why did they build it.
New subscriber. Really enjoy your videos. I was in Egypt in 1985 and took a tour inside the Great Pyramid. Would love to return, especially after watching your videos. I missed so much the first time. Now I know what to look for.
Wow,you were so lucky,,isn't that the way,,we would now know what we are looking at,no matter what it is,and with knowledge,understand it way better than when we were teenagers!....so it is,,,,my parents good friends,in the 60s,visited giza, and in the poloride picture they are at the base on camels....so cool.you have the time of your life,tnx,pat land o' lakes,wi.usa.
@@patmayer7222 Hi Pat! Greetings from the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia. I was lucky. I happened to be in Egypt due to a military training exercise and we lower ranking soldiers were allowed to go on tour. We were set loose in Giza, then taken to the pyramids. It was wierd because we were told to dress up for the tour, women were required to wear a dress and panty hose, so I climbed up inside the Great Pyramid wearing white heeled shoes and nylon stockings in 127 degree heat. One of the best times of my life.
@@TonyBraun There are papyrus showing the logistics of moving the stone up the nile to locations for building. We even see the quary marks on stone in these pyramids. Time to stop being immature and just get with the facts. Egyptians built them. End of. Keep up.
Honestly the only reason I think this misconception about large pyramidions exists in modern culture is the fact that Khafre's pyramid has the outer limestone layer left on its top and people think that pyramids are supposed to look like this.
Love your channel, but on this video... where did you get all the images? I ask because I'm going to Egypt in September and I've heard that you cant bring drones, let alone fly them into the country and some of these shots are obviously from a drone. thanks
I love the shot of the Top of khafre pyramid at 7:40 in the video . It’s very interesting and unknown to new eyes. First you can see what seems to be some recent written graffiti JRJ on the block about to slide off . Also the check out the originals lines carved out on top of each casing stone . Maybe a leftover trace or foot print of a Pyramidion .🤔???
Have any of these missing casing stones been found elsewhere and positively identified to be just that? I’ve done a quick search on this topic and didn’t really find much info on this.
Appreciate your careful attention to detail.
Thank you! New video on this topic soon.
Told in Stone and History for Granite are the real deal, one for Rome, the other for Egypt, short videos filled with information, to the point and well documented. Really appreciate the history lessons!
Both channels? Please enlighten me.
@@pittypatterputzzler5311 Check for yourself.
@@pittypatterputzzler5311
Search up “Told In Stone” if you have any interest in Roman history.
You won’t be dissatisfied 😊
It wouldn't surprise me if the two were intimate friends.😄
Thanks for the recc
This is a brilliant channel. Excellent narration, and smooth transitions in the editing which I believe is best to use to help get a point across. Well done. Very informative and most certainly makes one think about such amazing structures!
I started watching a video on Egypt and it was some guy in his kitchen, (I stopped watching)even if you're the best Egyptologist I need some level of presentation,
I agree with your assessment.
@stclairstclair That's exactly it. There are a lot of chanels that I cannot watch as the editing is all over the place.
I think it would be interesting if someone traveled around Cairo and looked for pieces of the pyramids that are being used in buildings.
I agree. Also evidence of hieroglyphs carved into those casing stones.
Can anybody refer me to a good study containing research of this type? I'm not having any luck in online searching but I'm assuming somebody MUST have gone looking for the robbed stone, so I'm probably just using the wrong search terms?
Pyramid casing stones might be harder to identify as reused masonry than Roman stone, I assume (less likely to have inscriptions all over them), but the size, quality and polish of the tura limestone blocks should surely still be identifiable even when incorporated into new structures...?
Good luck with that
I've heard there are mosques but I havent researched
i built my entire home out of blocks from the pyramids. Took a few trips though. 😅
Finally someone who knows which pyramid is the Great Pyramid. So many get it wrong, and I am not just talking UA-camrs, but PBS, the Discovery Channel conglomerate, even news channels or programs. I am so glad I did not have to yell at my computer "THAT IS NOT THE GREAT PYRAMID!!!"
What is it usually then?
@@Fireburst-kp4rm Khafres pyramid
I just found your channel through the UA-cam recommendations. Great videos! In both content and quality. I love learning about the pyramids and am looking forward to new videos. Thanks and good luck!
I recommend also Curoius Being channel 🙂 Tina shows there Giza from different perspective 🙂
I agree, great educational videos without all of the padding that many others have.
I just stumbled over this great channel too.😁
Studying ancient Egypt has been a hobby of mine for many years, and your observations and hypotheses of this wonderful culture are the most sensible and insightful I have seen.
While a golden peak would visually disappear during full daylight, it would look spectacular during sunrise and sunset, and in moonlight.
I don't think so. When the sun is low, beams would be deflected from the polished surface upwards (like radar waves from stealth plane).
@@DalHrusk Points of higher elevation tend to catch the sunlight first as the sun rises because as the sun is coming up, lower parts are still behind the shadow of the planet. Same thing happens in reverse during a sunset. So there was probably a time during dawn and dust when the golden top would have been brightly illuminated while the rest of the pyramid was in umbra
Egyptians and travelers were also more often and likely to see the pyramids at a greater distance, so the "blur" wouldn't really be a thing.
In moonlight, possibly, but not at sunset or sunrise. This because the angle would always reflect light upwards, and never downwards. That can only happen when the light source is above a pyramid - as the moon can be.
anyone who has built anything knows that things look good the day they are delivered, then after a few weeks / months years, it starts looking like crap unless you do regular maintenance, which nobody does
It's fascinating that the bent pyramid is so often derided by Egyptologists as a "failed" project, when its construction method was so much more resistant to damage-over-time than the later pyramids!
Yea, another of history's lies. Although I also think that the state of the world's climate during construction was integral in each pyramids design. Vapor canopy/heliolithic
Yes but no.
There were at least 2 things that made the difference, and IMHO mostly related to the ease of removing casing stones duing the middle ages:
#1. The less tightly packed arrangement ironically caused fewer casing stones to come loose during bad earthquakes, making it harder to get them down from the pyramid itslef.
#2. The greater distance from the river Nile made transporting stones from the site itself far more difficult than it would have been when the pyramid was originally built along the now dried up Ahramat branch of the river.
@@thomascampbell7407 Wouldn’t call it a lie, people have been trying to elucidate why there was an interim design form, that was replaced by another, in a very short period of time. Some think it was for structural stability, others for esthetic reasons. What bad motivation would there be for a person to attempt to deceive others regarding such a point?
@@thomascampbell7407 Wouldn’t call it a lie, people have been trying to elucidate why there was an interim design form, that was replaced by another, in a very short period of time. Some think it was for structural stability, others for esthetic reasons. What bad motivation would there be for a person to attempt to deceive others regarding such a point?
@@thomascampbell7407 Wouldn’t call it a lie, people have been trying to elucidate why there was an interim design form, that was replaced by another, in a very short period of time. Some think it was for structural stability, others for esthetic reasons. What bad motivation would there be for a person to attempt to deceive others regarding such a point?
When my friend had a huge granite slab installed in his kitchen as a counter top...It took the installers a huge amount of effort to get it plumb. In other words this slab was cut with two flat surfaces. And it took the workers most of the day to get it level so it could support any type of load that may be required in a kitchen. Now the paving stones they used to level the bottom support layer that the Great Pyramid was built on, have the top side flat, and the bottoms are contoured to fit the natural terrain. That is amazing to think about.
@The Great Gazoo exactly. People today to give so little credit to these ancient civilisations. They were amazing at what they did and we haven't got a clue how they did, that's it.
@@matmul4850 thousands of years of working with stones makes them specialists. This was time where only the usfull survived,
@The Great Gazoo I still wonder how they managed to be so precise yet effective with their stonework. I feel like they must have had really advanced tools than what we thought
I had granite installed. They put the flat blocks on my plumb cabinets. I don't understand why anyone would have cabinets with uneven tops. The wall behind was all kinds of uneven. 🤷♂️
@@noahallvall8562 No need for very advanced tools. Experience, knowledge and craftsmanship paired with plentiful workforce can do amazing thing. That said, most masonry in the pyramids is quite irregular and show that they didn't waste much time quarrying the stone which is a good old trick hat was still in used until the early 20th. You put efforts on finishing the casing, but the rest is done with "lower" standards to make it efficient and cost effective.
Excellent video! It never occurred to me that the blinding glare from the white limestone would completely ruin the effect of a possible golden pyramidion, but it makes perfect sense now that you mention it! Thanks!
This channel is taking up too much of my time! I am hooked.
Michel Rabbat/Florida...At 81+ I learned a lot from you today...Ma-allam (teacher).
I think a CGI time lapse of the pyramids aging through history (to the best of your knowledge) would be cool to see.
Really love that you just reason logically. Great job!
Your explanations are neat and clear. An example in the Ockham's Razor application to pyramids... Keep going!
Hi, welcome to UA-cam Pyramide ;-) Loved your first videos, well documented with photos and videos. Contrarily to some comments I’ve seen (get used to it) I love seeing people using their own brain and common sense to come up with hypothesis ! After all Egyptologists did the same until only recently with more scientific methodologies. So keep up popping vids out. This one on pyramiding was super informative, and made a lot of sense … Cheers
Love your channel! I would love to see a video about what happened to the majority of the casing stones. I've heard that there was a major earthquake in the 1300's that caused most of them to loosen or fall down, and the people of Cairo used a lot of them to rebuild. It would be interesting to see some of the buildings that were repaired using the casing stones.
@oldmetalhead1 Yes, has anybody done any documentary work tracing the former coping-stones' current locations, presumably now incorporated within older buildings of Cairo & other surrounding towns? We see a lot of robbed Roman/pre-Henrician stone clearly visible in old English churches & similar, so presumably one can see something similar when walking the streets of modern Egyptian cities' "old quarters". Would be intriguing to see what era of structure it turns up in most, & whether it was reworked for greater decorativeness there, or just left as worked-but-plain blocks?
I'm addicted to this channel, feels like it's making me smarter and more of a critical thinker
Thank you for this wonderful comment.
One should have the opportunity to give an additional like with every rewatch. Been here for at least the third time!
Watched them all. Lovely. Calm, rational, logical, common sense, open to valid differing interpretations... and.. a human voice, unless your AI voice replicator has gotten so real. I hope it's you. Thanks so much. ANy other vids in the same vein will be watched by me. THANKS .
Much appreciated!
Always thoughtful and well reasoned information on your channel. Thank you.
I too, was just introduced to ur channel today and have of course subscribed to this channel because well the only reason I need and that being you sir actually bring ALL questions, statements, most egyptologist bullshit answers and real life conclusions into the video and leave the viewer to gain their own understanding all the while telling ur reasons for y or y not. Definite subscriber till the end, keep up the great work
So, how did they get down if, when they put the casing stone on, they went from the ground up? Did they slide down, or have a secret door up top?
Hanube prolly
They still had ramps around the pyramid. Next step after capstone placement would be to dismantle the ramp as you go down.
Probably worked top down, one would think.
This is the 2nd or 3rd video I've watched, I subbed right away.
Going to go and watch more. Keep up the good work.
Just discovered your channel earlier and I absolutely love it and look forward to much much more. Thanks ! ~ M
Another excellent production and commentary- your firm grasp on evidence is appreciated. 🌿🌎🌍🌏🌿
Placing the capstone on one of the great pyramids would have been the highlight of somebody's career.
A real feather in their cap, so to say :)
Good video. I saw Khafre up close. The remaining casing stones are weathered. But it sure looks cool.
Do you plan on making a dedicated video on the Black Pyramid? I think it looks really fascinating, and I hear the substructure is pretty complex despite the mostly ruined superstructure
Yeah the black pyramid is very interesting and there’s a huge lack of information available on it
This is a great new channel!!! Love it!
Thanks for new footage and close-up views. It is amazing how many stones are skewed out of position. I believe the Giza pyramids are pre-Dynastic, as they are devoid of hieroglyphics, and are probably thousands of years older than they are currently dated.
No point in having hieroglyphics carved in a capstone, when it could never be seen from ground level!
No they are not older 🤦♂️
Possibly it couldn't be usefully seen from any level?
(Not unless you were a god, and could fly.)
Actually according to eyewitness accounts the pyramids were covered with hieroglyphics. That is why sometimes when a building in Cairo gets renovated they find hieroglyphics on the inside the wall side of the stones.
They cant date the Sphinx but they can date the pyramids because the mortar used in the construction contains biological material that can be carbon dated...They are not older but the Sphinx must be.
@@guydevilrook2303 Why do you say the sphinx "must" be?
Great episode! Will you do the Aztec or Mayan pyramids?
I have long wondered about the casing stones----if they were removed in the last several centuries, are there any records of that happening? And any known reuse for these stones? I think you said in a recent video that this type of limestone is soft, relatively speaking, when first cut, so why go to the bother of recovering the casing stones and recutting them vs just digging out new blocks?
Great channel.
the Mosque Madrasa in Cairo is made from the pyramid case stones
@@Daniel-po8eb There are some remaining casing stones. Why would you say the casing is a guess?
top channel and quality work. you're gonna go far dude. 100k, 500k then beyond in no time. watch this space.
Awesome content, thank you! I've loosely followed most of the discoveries about the pyramids over a few decades and i think this content has generated my first solid question. if the pyramids were covered in gleaming white stone, would the sun-side even be safely approachable (heat, light and glare) and are there any other structures in the path of this reflection? it would seem that there wouldnt be any structures as it would be too uncomfortable to occupy anything too close to this heat source.
I think the heat would be relatively equal on all sides, but you do make a good point that most pyramid related structures were built on the eastern and northern sides, where the glare would be the least bothersome.
@@HistoryforGRANITE Thank you for answering this... because i really didnt know... Appreciated!
Yes,,,,never thought of that aspect..like in the city,next to glass covered buildings the glare is also heat reflection...burning anything in its path..!...wow....even more mystery.....this vid is great content...tnx,
Would't the angle of the pyramid reflect the light upward? a 6ft tall man can walk right up to it without getting hit.
One of the issues we see in dome building is thermal expansion along a single line closest to the sun as it arcs across the sky. I believe you'd see the same effect on the solar sides, but spread more evenly across the entire stone surface. I like where you're going, I had similar ideas about where the shadows would fall.
how would you fit the cap stone ? how would you steal it?
... you're honestly asking over the course of the last 3 to 5000 years how and why someone would steal that stone are you serious?...?
Thanks for these great videos about the pyramids. They are way better than most in every way. Hope you will keep making them. Are you in Egypt now? I was out at Menkaure for a few hours yesterday admiring the granite casing stones, inspired by your video about them. I didn't see you around! I sat on the bottom coarse and leaned my head back against the stone and closed my eyes and placed my palms against the granite on either side of me and I felt like a battery on a charger. It's like the pyramids have a charge or something. It's electric. I find the energy on the necropolis very palpable. Thanks again for these superb videos. Newest subscriber. Salam.
You’re making me jealous with this comment!
The energy you describe is amazing. Here’s aspect no one seems to mention because of all the attention on what the pyramids looked like during the day: Imagine the reflection coming off white granite on brilliant nights or various moon stages. Would that energy have flowed differently? I would love to see a video of whether it reflected light into the surrounding area & how bright that light was at different times.
thank you.
Enjoying this material and this channel - looking forward to more videos - well done
Sorry I've come to this late, but can I ask: do you think it would have been possible to climb a large pyramid clad in limestone with razor-thin gaps?
Which begs the follow-up question: if it was AT ALL difficult, how did they construct the casing at all?
@@MoAndAye OMFG begging the question is a logical fallacy STOP PLEASE STOP RUINING LANGUAGE NOW STOTTSTPTTPTSOETJPU{WEGP(} q
@@MoAndAye Do you think it would have been possible to climb a large pyramid clad in limestone with razor-thin gaps?
@@TimPerfetto Possible for the experienced individual, but highly improbable for large numbers of workers carrying tools and super heavy materials and all working closely together. So, yeah, that's part of my dilemma. I have been assuming that they worked from the top down while applying the outer limestone skin.
@@MoAndAye WTF are you talking about? To "beg the question" is to attempt to support a claim with a premise that itself restates or presupposes the claim. It is an attempt to prove a proposition while simultaneously taking the proposition for granted. Jesus Christ stop using this incorrectly for the love of god
Hello, I really enjoy your channel, you have unique perspectives and eye opening insights. Rather than thinking about the perspective of those on the ground, consider the Ariel view. The missing portion of the great pyramid is about 9 meters, approximately 30 feet. If it was gold, the sun would have shined onto it, and the white walls of the pyramid would have created a 750 foot square back drop, which the golden peak would be reflected. Now consider the sides of the pyramid are split and slightly concaved, each half of each face would reflect light towards its opposite half, creating a crossed over double enhanced reflection of light. I have done a reflective analysis on how it would have reflected the sun, and have concluded that each of the four corners would have blasted out quadruped beams of reflection, while the centers of the four split lines would have emitted double rays of reflected sunlight. And if you draw this out as I have, you will end up with the same image we get from stars, a bright center with eight points of light. Also, with having the whole structure ontop of the white desert sand, the reflections from the great pyramid would have shot out for many miles, making it totally visible from space. Now when you consider that Gold reflects the color Red, from outer space the great pyramid would have shined like a blazing red star in the night sky, precisely like Betelgeuse, which in my opinion, is a planet with its pyramids still intact.
I believe there was also a major earthquake that really loosened all the casing stones, while at the same time leveling Cairo.
Something more catastrophic, they their is glass near by everywhere in the sand, and the stone statues and structures are literally melted/burnt, earthquakes don’t do that, solar flares do.
@Roman Pontian I was multitasking and didn’t use the correct terminology, but since you wanna get all smart ass like I won’t bother, go look up bright insight on the lost capital of Egypt and other of his videos, and go look up brien forester , they both have concrete evidence on something major happened with extreme heat.
@@AdriansCreatures relax, and share ideas. For solar flare activity lookup, suspicious 0bserver, the o on Observer is a zero.
There's also several dendrochronologist that are showing a major CME impact around every Thousand Years. Major solar flare activity might also solve the heat Paradox of the ice caps melting can bring us out of the last ice age.
@@kalrandom7387the casing stone was so bright lit by the sun that the structure could be seen miles away. Sounds like heating to me
I love your approach to these questions :) Very nice job !
Wow this the first time I see such an excellent narration about the pyramids from a historic objective view (none of that UFO crap). I really enjoy it. 👍
The "UFO crap" doesnt depict Alien spacecraft lifting objects, it depicts a higher intelligenct civilisation from this world or another, that shared technological advances we have not yet found evidence of, to help them build things like these.
Have a look at these stones carvings and all around the world, not just Egypt. Imagine yourself carving or moving these stones without machinery. Its very difficult for the intelligent mind to fathom how such perfection can be created, without some form of more advanced engineering compared to the "mainstream" thinking that civilisations back then were much dumber than us.
Its hard to trust any Egyptoligist because they seem to all be biased to the culture rather than willing to believe a variation from their own "true" belief, exactly like religions such as Christianity who roned the world saying their religion is correct and will kill anyone who stands in the way.
Open minds are what bring truth to the real situations. If we all have closed minds about things we do not understand, there is no way of advancing ourselves. An exmaple would be how everyone centuries ago believed the world was flat, then when some said its curved and we wont fall off the earth, those people were shunned and ridiculed, only because they didnt travel as far and so could not imagine it.
The same goes for religions around the world. Although religions are all different, there has to be a reason why so many civilisations have a religion in the first place. A BASE course of these thinkings and beliefs would have began somewhere in history which we cannot know of yet.
Its not about are aliens real or not, its about being able to have an open mind to things we could not think of or believe.
@@Lemon83166 Ancient civilizations had a lot of technological advances none of had anything to do with extraterrestrial from other worlds,' by the way nobody in antiquity ever said that the Earth was flat they knew better than that. The Romans connected an entire continent with a network of aqueducts and highways, It's the ufologist that say these people were too stupid to achieve what they did unless they were helped by somebody.
ua-cam.com/video/pk4xa6Tzwvk/v-deo.html
What about the first and last rays of sun in the morning and evening? The gold pyramidians would look marvellous!
Good point!
The angle of the pyramid faces would reflect the sunlight upwards, not towards a viewer on the ground - especially for a metallic surface like gold.
great video as always👍👍 10:52
They must have looked amazing when first built ! 😳
Like a glass skyscraper. The sun reflected may melt your car. Something else went on the dazzling sunlight white stone could be seen for miles and yet somehow desert glass shows up
@@brendawilliams8062 you mean 'melt your chariot !' 😊
@@gerry5134 about as much funny as melted cars. Maybe they knew something. 😂
@@gerry5134 After that sun tan i believe I would be looking for the cryogenics lab
@@brendawilliams8062why you comparing 2 different surfaces? Yes they both reflect but limestone reflects randomly which would mean it would be a lot less blinding than glass would be.
So fascinating! Makes so much sense. Once again , thank you! I love your work!
I would love to hear your take on all the sacred geometry including so many astronomical and global measurements built into the Great Pyramid. Randall Carlsons 2 hr After Skool video explains it in much detail. Great channel, continued success.
@Dan Paulson stick with the Mad Scientists Club....its your mental level.
@Dan Paulson no i dont bother using reasoning with smartasses, just call them out on their stupidity, good luck with your childrens stories, is that how u lure them into the van? Try candy.
@Dan Paulson ohhh, the van comment struck too close to home huh? Shhhh, dont worry your secrets safe with me.
@Dan Paulson no...sob sob...they stay hidden inside your van and basement.....
@Dan Paulson what would i care if my comment was filtered by dicks at yt? They were intended for you roflmao, what a simple witted pedo noob u are!
At last, a channel that deals with ancient architecture with a scientific approach: observations, recontextualizations, references to published studies, far from fantasies !
Regarding the implementation of the Kephren pyramid, it may be surprising to see that a layer of less cohesive material is inserted between the structural core and the white limestone coating, weakening the facades.
But that would be explained by the order of construction of these three works : the structural core is first built with well-adjusted blocks, then the facing blocks are placed on the periphery of each course, and before moving on to the next layer, the interstice with the core is filled with blocks adjusted as best as possible, but probably never perfectly (work in constrained space, no possibility of removing a failed block) and perhaps a little smaller.
This protocol would work as well in the case of a core built first, then dressed from below, as in the case of a progressive construction layer by layer.
I highly recommand this lecture from a searcher from Harvard about the top part of Kufu's pyramid :
ua-cam.com/video/eku9o_q9OA4/v-deo.html&ab_channel=HarvardMuseumoftheAncientNearEast
(from 48'10'')
lol
Very nicely done!
Really great channel. Appreciate the fresh perspective of the Egyptian pyramids. What are your views of them being predynastic constructions?
The pyramids have been extensively carbon-dated - the mortar that binds blocks was made in wood-burning fires that left residue. Also numerous pyramids have original wood within them, including Djoser, Meidum, Bent and the Great Pyramid (in the shafts). There's a margin of error to push the dates back a few hundred years, but not much more unless all the carbon dating is wrong.
@@glennmorris25 I heard this recently. The pyramids were actually smaller and some think all they did was expand on it. Prob is the relieving chambers were not entered till the 1800s. Yes some people think the graffiti is fake. It is a interesting theory but it crumbles if the graffiti is proved to be authentic. My question is why are they taking so long to see behind the doors in the 2 shafts? They entered on but refuse to continue. Why? Not enough room for a hidden chamber. Seems odd they found doors and stopped.
@@HistoryforGRANITE But surely the wood that was found in the shafts could have been put there at any time in the past, that doesn’t prove the age of the structure, it just proves the age of the wood found and that goes for the mortar, like the repairs done to the Sphinx etc.
@@MURD3RWAVE yes why haven't they?
Further, my questions are, how did the builders construct the most sophisticated pyramids without seemingly any real precursor to the design and then subsequent pyramids were of smaller simpler design?
For such momentous constructions as the Giza pyramids, why is there no real written evidence of there construction or celebration? After all, the Egyptians were prolifict hieroglyph writers in stone, yielding valuable information relied on and used by modern historians to build a picture of Egyptian history.
Why, (as I understand it) were the Egyptians repairing the Sphinx around the time it was supposed to be being built?
For my money, these magnificent constructions were created in a much earlier time and recommissioned by a later civilisation.
@@mrmanch204 From what I read it was noted a few times in the past records the Great Pyramid did a hieroglyphics on it. In fact a lot. The first few courses apparently had lots of hieroglyphics on the casing stones. One of the historians wrote he did not know what it said but the locals said it was how much food and payment it cost the king to build. Lost to history. I'm sure it gave all the info on how it was built. For who. The cost and time. People say they never wrote anything about it. Well chances are they absolutely did. The casing stones crumbled or were stolen. Same with claims the queens chamber had a granite floor, hieroglyphs on the ceiling and a sarcophagus like the Kings chamber. All lost through time with looters and old religious nutters. One of those things that people in the Alt history crowd ignore. The pyramid did have info on it. I imagine they wrote how proud they were and who it was for on it. No need to write on papyrus. They thought the pyramid would be eternal. They probably wrote everything about it on the actual pyramid. I believe 2 or 3 old historians wrote about it. In fact one the missing journals of a historian supposedly copied what was written on it. People are actually searching for the lost journal. I came to the conclusion that we will never ever all totally agree how it was done. You can look this stuff up. I have a hard time with remembering the Muslim and Greek names.
Did the finished pyramid have 4 or 8 sides with its casing stones in place?
The builders of Stonehenge - knew as long as the stones remained the information would be carried. What is now a ruin - was once a magnificent building! Your channel is groundbreaking genius - keep up the amazing work!
Lol you literally have no way of knowing that. At all
Just binging all videos at this moment haha. Great content my dude keep it up!
And subbed now because you liked
I agree with everything you've said but you should also take into account that in case of golden piramidion, during sunrise, when sun rays would hit the piramidion first, it would create a spectacular show. The same goes for sunset and last rays of the day.
Awesome video! New sub here! Very well done videos!
Astonishing. The Great Pyramid was clad in limestone but the Pyramid of Khafre was actually clad in granite if I’m not mistaken. Thanks for uploading!
Only the first bottom course was granite for Khafre. Menkaure had 16 courses, which may have been the record. Later pyramids in the 5th/6th dynasty would often have 1 course of granite as well.
@@HistoryforGRANITE Using precisely cut granite would have been a status point of considerable effect since the granite would be significantly harder to work than limestone or marble. Even so, granite is easier to shape than most "theorists" imagine.
@@theeddorian Is it? Then why can't anybody shape the granite as per the copper chisels and pounding stone methods?
@@marktyler3381 The "pounding stones" "method" can easily shape granite. Only an idiot would try to use copper to do so. The Egyptians were not idiots.
@@theeddorian Perhaps experimental archeology could demonstrate how easy it is.
i was there, many stones and statues had air bubbles. what does that mean?
Concrete.
Excellent.
I love granite. ...... My family owned tin mines, and the biggest tin smelter, in Cornwall, England, and West Cornwall is granite. ...... My great-grandfather built 2 granite country houses, one in Cornwall, one in Devon, around 1905 - all cut granite. ...... I really appreciate the craftsmanship it takes to cut stone, having occasionally wielded a chisel on granite myself.
Thats correct..... Tin is 12 times stronger than granite ,,,,,, my family invented the USB protocol
@@TimPerfetto I should have written 'West Penwith is granite' as not all of west Cornwall is granite.
/
You wrote 'Tin is 12 times stronger than granite'.
To crush?
/
You wrote 'My family invented the USB protocol'.
Cool.
My father never told me -
probably did not know -
that my great-grandfather invented the Wilmot Automatic Transmitter,
which was effectively the computer router of the telegraph cables,
when he was Superintendent of Waterville Cable Station in Ireland.
Amazing what one can find out on Google!
Nothing the pyramid fanbois hate more than someone who actually has worked granite, with a chisel no less :)
Has anyone ever done a video of all the differences inside & out between the two largest pyramids on the Giza Plateau, we know the great pyramid has a horizontal line & slight indentation down each face but other than that & what do we currently know about each one internally, what I’m trying to suggest is could it be possible that the Great Pyramid is much older, it has sea fossils at its base etc does the 2nd ? maybe the 2nd was built to copy the Great & they tried to make the 2nd appear better/grander than the Great due to it being built higher ground? That’s why they are the most fascinating structures on earth because there are so many unanswered questions.
Watch Graham Hancock and Brian Forester
@@staffyforme I do 😊
They are scam artisits who have made millions selling books and will do anything to keep their lies going, thats why they will ne asking the questions they have been for 20 years for another 20 years because answering anything will not benefit them. "We have taken samples for testing" - three years later you hear nothing from their samples, they dont follow science. Brian forester said he discovered magnetite, lol
@@taylorgall9516 everyone is entitled to their opinion obviously, some make more sense than the official explanation and that's interesting
@@taylorgall9516 do lies really sell that many books? The truth is literally set in stone all over the world
Very informative, thanks. 👍👍😊
The gilded pyramidion is in emulation of the sun and solar rays. It is meant to be visible from far away, not looking up from the base. I think your theory is not considering this effect
Very interesting. There are many ancient megalithic structures that have specific orientations such that the light of the sun (or the moon, or a star) illuminates a specific feature of the structure to mark a specific day and time of the year - usually solstices and equinoxes. IF such an arrangement was in use in Egypt, people would not have had to look at it every day, just on those days of importance. On those occasions, the first instant of light flashing off of a pyramidion would be important for marking the event. Of course, any highly polished surface, such as black granite, might produce the same effect, leaving open the possibility that if they were gilded it was probably intended as a statement of wealth and power. 'Gilding the lily', so to speak.(LOL)
Do you suppose this dark basalt pyramidion concept is related to the existence of the 'stained' stone on top of the Great Pyramid?
It's difficult to connect the dark pyramidions of the Middle Kingdom to the 4th dynasty because it's a huge gap in time, but it's certainly possible. What we really need is a proper forensic examination of the stained stone as a starting point for what to think of it.
@@HistoryforGRANITE While I read this I heard exactly your voice as narrator in my head LoL
My understanding is that the exteriors of the pyramids at Giza were intact (other than the so-called "robber's tunnel") until around the 12th or 13th centuries or thereabouts, when a massive earthquake loosened them up and made quarrying them feasible. The earthquake apparently also flattened Cairo, thus creating a large demand for stone for rebuilding. If this is true, then the pyramids would have withstood the thermal expansion for millennia with no visible damage. It's possible that the builders had some mechanism that we don't understand for dealing with it.
Expand with sun, contract at night = net zero?
Oh, imagine going back in time to see the pyramids in their original glory. They are incredible now but they would have been utterly magnificent. The medieval builders of cathedrals in Europe sort to amaze the peasants with the absolute glory of god, and anyone living today is moved by the architecture when stepping into one. Just think what the average peasant or foreigner to Egypt all those years ago thought upon first sight of these incredible buildings. I absolutely loved visiting Egypt and I hope I can get there again before I die so as to see all these wonders of humanity .
I can't count the number of times I have been the one to first tell someone about how the limestone would have glistened in the sunlight. Often the look on their faces as they imagine it is simply great. I really don't understand why this isn't one of the basic facts that everyone knows. Sure, I am a history nerd who has listened to more hours of lecture on various bits of history than I can count but Egypt is more of a peripheral interest of mine so its not as if I have tons of detailed knowledge on the subject of pre-Ptolemaic Egypt. (2 guesses where I focus my attention for the ancient world)
People think castles were dark and dingy and everyone was dressing rags historically too..........movies are to blame.
@@MrBottlecapBill Yeah, but there are plenty of bright gleaming white that should NOT be there. Think all of those older depictions of the Greco-Roman world due to all the paint that was once covering things, weathering into oblivion.
One could go a step further and cry foul at Kurosawa and his color coded armies in Ran. Or hell the green/chain grey/plate aesthetic of Rohan and Gondor.
Point being: sometimes it works, other times it is the opposite of reality but still works, other times it causes your brain to leak out of your ear but is a known trope so gl dealing with that mess.
@@whyjnot420 It's easy to deal with. It's just nobody in hollywood cares to. A minor bit of research from writers and on set experts is all it takes. That's always been too much to ask it seems.
@@MrBottlecapBill That only tells a portion of the story, a big portion, but still only a portion. Another big part of it is audience expectation. If a certain trope is what people expect, regardless of its historical authenticity, changing it to something the audience does not expect in order to bring in something that is historically authentic, actually relies on suspension of disbelief to some extent and thus it is easier to _not_ change the trope.
You've made me so interested in something I've never been interested in before.
I would run a simulation to check the appearance of each pyramid at sunrise/sunset/night. We just don't know what the ancient deemed pleasing to the eye, we don't even know if the pyramidions had anything to do with a visual experience at all. For example, in medieval Italian churches there are countless examples of small paintings hung very high, making it impossible to notice any detail in them: experiencing the art was not as important as feeling its presence.
Exactly, you don't paint a car just because it looks nice, the paint serves a function, and this guy is basing his whole theory on looks.
Great explanation, now what kind of sunglasses did the construction workers have setting bright white stones?
Great Pyramid was covered in white dolomite, not lime stone. It did have a gold top. When viewed from the top, you notice it has 8 sides, as a slight indentation at the center for the 4 sides. It had wiring inside & flowed a river beneath, as a sort of conduit. Giant charging stations!
Annoyingly, searching for Dolomite will bring up shoes. But interesting input. I didn't know that.
@@Aracne80 Here is Wikipedia link for dolomite. I hope it makes things easier. 🙂 - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolomite_(rock)
There is no evidence that any pyramid had a gold on the top that’s just an urban myth, so is the one about the pyramids being covered with hieroglyphs, they are just not true.
@@thorncraft3235 That's an opinion, not a fact. You can't really prove nor disprove it. Of course there are pyramids below Giza as well that were found & really ancient ones underground in what you would call middle-earth.
@@adriennemarierozario6591 you stated it as fact, you said “It did have a gold top”. Yet there has never been any evidence of a gold top & that is a fact. Or wiring inside, I don’t believe what I’m told in videos I prefer evidence & there is none the ‘power station theory’ is just that a Theory & nothing else, believe what you like but science tells you to follow the evidence. I do believe there are things on the Giza Plateau that can not be explained by mainstream academics like drill holes and precision carvings of extremely hard stone that could not have been done with copper chisels so there must of been either tools they had then that have not been found due to the metal being taken & repurposed or them objects are from a previous civilisation that predates all Egyptian history and it originally came from what the Egyptians themselves call Zep Tepe, but no one knows for sure, more evidence is needed.
9:50 mark. How much rain is that region getting?
Google says that Giza receives 0.81 mm per year.
A video on the possible use of the pyramids for electricity production would be awsome.
Except that there is no reason to think that they used any electricity.
I think they'd have used something more effective than swords, spears, and horse drawn chariots eventually if they had knowk dge of electricity.
And their rival nations would have used electricity also.
The context of temperature and climate supposed (vis a vis thermal expansion and sunlight glare) suggests the current desert weather was the dominant atmospheric conditions when perhaps instead more temperate weather conditions might have have been the case, consistent with a paleo-climate of the pre-Younger Dryas which is becoming an increasingly likely environment for the pyramids’ construction.
Considering the high degree of precise engineering and execution, there were no mistakes made in this project. The white casing could have also been expected to reflect away the sun's radiation and so preserve the monument from heating and thermal cycling. If there had been a gilded cap, it could have served as a mirror for signaling from a ground based emitter.
Ground based emitter..... what the he'll are you talking about
@@matmul4850 You would think that anyone who builds a very high structure (at considerable expense) would use it as a lookout (to see if friends, enemies or storms are coming) and then would use this expensive creation for a practical purpose such as to signal by light (maybe at night) in a system for communication of disaster protocols (what to do if an attack or a storm occurs or maybe other news).
@@robertsmyk4102no need for such a high and expensive look out. Looking that far sounds useless anyhow. Nobody can see anything that far away.
Also, no evidence that it could have been used as a look out.
How difficult and how hard would it be to restore the pyramids back to the limestone?
There is no way this pyramid was built in one Pharaoh's lifetime. The length of time to place the stones and the amount of time it would take to cut the stones out of the quarry using even today's fastest methods
Thanks...information I always wanted in your shows
In short no one knows why the Egyptian Pyramids were built. Anything in them was taken out. The theories range from weird or crazy, burial tombs, water pumps, nuclear reactors or space aliens. I read many of the theories the chemical complex chemical reactor seems the most realistic. The most basic question is what it is and why did they build it.
Nothing crazy about the space alien theory Don. The U.S. is now in the process of fessing up over UFO’s. 👽
I love this channel ... congratulations for the absolutely insane quality of the videos published here !! keep up the googd work !!
New subscriber. Really enjoy your videos. I was in Egypt in 1985 and took a tour inside the Great Pyramid. Would love to return, especially after watching your videos. I missed so much the first time. Now I know what to look for.
Wow,you were so lucky,,isn't that the way,,we would now know what we are looking at,no matter what it is,and with knowledge,understand it way better than when we were teenagers!....so it is,,,,my parents good friends,in the 60s,visited giza, and in the poloride picture they are at the base on camels....so cool.you have the time of your life,tnx,pat land o' lakes,wi.usa.
@@patmayer7222 Hi Pat! Greetings from the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia. I was lucky. I happened to be in Egypt due to a military training exercise and we lower ranking soldiers were allowed to go on tour. We were set loose in Giza, then taken to the pyramids. It was wierd because we were told to dress up for the tour, women were required to wear a dress and panty hose, so I climbed up inside the Great Pyramid wearing white heeled shoes and nylon stockings in 127 degree heat. One of the best times of my life.
When the pyramids were built the Sahara was tropical. The Egyptians didn’t build the pyramids, rather they were custodians of what they found.
Rubbish. We have hieroglyphs and papyrus showing the logistics of building them. Keep up.
@@Giantdwarf00 Rubbish........there is no written record of the building of the great pyramids......none.
@@TonyBraun There are papyrus showing the logistics of moving the stone up the nile to locations for building. We even see the quary marks on stone in these pyramids. Time to stop being immature and just get with the facts. Egyptians built them. End of. Keep up.
@@Giantdwarf00 Giant opinion of yourself .........but dwarfs brain.......there is absolutely NO evidence about how the Pyramids were built.....NONE
@@TonyBraun lol ok. Have a good day. Stay safe.
my new favorite news portal
Marc Antony write they could see the pyramids from 100 miles away. The white limestone casing them shine very bright.
You taught me something new today. ❤
That was informative enough for me to subscribe to the channel.
Interesting video 👍
Great videos. Keep up the good job! Much appreciated.
Honestly the only reason I think this misconception about large pyramidions exists in modern culture is the fact that Khafre's pyramid has the outer limestone layer left on its top and people think that pyramids are supposed to look like this.
Love your channel, but on this video... where did you get all the images? I ask because I'm going to Egypt in September and I've heard that you cant bring drones, let alone fly them into the country and some of these shots are obviously from a drone. thanks
I can't express the depth of my gratitude for making it through a third video of yours without hearing "Aliens".
Are there buildings and houses in the area built with the removed casing stones or are they just gone ???
I love the shot of the Top of khafre pyramid at 7:40 in the video . It’s very interesting and unknown to new eyes. First you can see what seems to be some recent written graffiti JRJ on the block about to slide off . Also the check out the originals lines carved out on top of each casing stone . Maybe a leftover trace or foot print of a Pyramidion .🤔???
Excellent!!! Love your videos
Have any of these missing casing stones been found elsewhere and positively identified to be just that? I’ve done a quick search on this topic and didn’t really find much info on this.
Apparently the Mosque Madrasa in Cairo is made from the casing stones. They were probably used in much of the local architecture.
Cool. This was very interesting. Thank you
What happened to the stone? Are there buildings in Cairo that used them? Great videos btw. I’m really enjoying watching all of them 👍✌️
Excellent video. Give us more :)
Excellent viewing - thank you for sharing 👍
Makes sense... bugger.. 🤷♂️ I liked the gilded golden capstone theory. Good show, thanks mate 👍