Planning Long Range Stages for the Tactical Games

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 7

  • @dbut5427
    @dbut5427 Рік тому +1

    Always dropping knowledge

  • @JacobHeppner
    @JacobHeppner Рік тому +1

    Love it! Thanks!

  • @drummnl
    @drummnl Рік тому +1

    Great info!

  • @johnthompson7234
    @johnthompson7234 10 місяців тому +1

    what's your zero? The stages were unknown distance?

    • @sunandshadow_llc
      @sunandshadow_llc  10 місяців тому +1

      I use a 100yd zero. This particular stage was known but a few of us used rangefinders to confirm. Always good to confirm the distances for yourself.

  • @SantosGunworks
    @SantosGunworks Рік тому

    While it makes sense to think that using holdovers is going to be faster, it is not necessarily the case. If I have a target that is 4.3 Mils out, I prefer to just dial 4.3 Mils because I just have the center hold. If I use the reticle , it can take time to line up the 4.3 Mil line and then after recoil, it takes time again to find the 4.3 Mil line on the reticle.
    I train both, but if given a choice, dialing is more accurate and oftentimes it is faster overall.

    • @sunandshadow_llc
      @sunandshadow_llc  Рік тому

      Yes, I’d agree to dial if we are talking about a single target/single distance. The center reticle is the most useful in this case. However, if we’re looking at multiple targets/multiple distances and the goal is speed, dialing for every target will not get you the fastest time.
      We have a separate video discussing hold vs dial, as well as a hybrid of the two for multi-target stages. We also discuss ways to cut out some of the “fluff” to improve speed when using holds.