Top 5 Diamond Aircraft Comparison 2022-2023 | Price & Specs

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 102

  • @AviationFederation
    @AviationFederation  2 роки тому +8

    *How would you rate each of these 5 aircraft models from Diamond Aircraft? What other features are you looking for in a small plane? Let us know what you think! To see more exciting aircraft videos, check these out:*
    Top 5 Cheapest Twin-Engine Piston Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price Comparison
    ua-cam.com/video/i0l0isNUAZQ/v-deo.html
    Top 5 Single-Engine Piston Airplanes Around $500K
    ua-cam.com/video/aP6d6-WKNiE/v-deo.html&t
    Top 3 Cirrus Aircraft Price Comparison 2022-2023 2022-2023 | New Features
    ua-cam.com/video/MsIIqidP95o/v-deo.html

  • @josh885
    @josh885 2 роки тому +22

    Diamond really needs a model above the DA62 with the DA50RG engines so it can hit at least 200kts and ideally a pressurized cabin.

    • @moviefalk177
      @moviefalk177 2 роки тому +3

      So true

    • @_purge9488
      @_purge9488 Рік тому

      Yea the 20K ceiling made me laugh knowing that it’s depressurized lol

    • @petkuscinta9797
      @petkuscinta9797 10 місяців тому

      I was just wondering if CD300 Turbo is superior to other non-Continental engines. I really like the DA50 RG but are two Aestro motors safer than one CD300?

  •  2 роки тому +3

    Estes aviões da Diamond me fascinam! Já ouvi pilotos experientes dizerem, que os bimotores desta marca são superlativamente eficientes, econômicos e seguros. Só me falta a grana pra adquirir um destes! Um da linha dos monomotores já seria um luxo sem tamanho pra mim. Sonhar não paga imposto né! ☺️

  • @richardgripe5888
    @richardgripe5888 2 роки тому +10

    Looking for 300hp. per side and 200kt cruise, maybe pressurized

  • @huto9606
    @huto9606 2 роки тому +2

    Für mich das beste Flugzeug in dieser Klasse. Das Unternehmen ist langsam von Jahr zu Jahr gewachsten. Alle gewonnen Erkenntnisse wurden in der nächsten Generation von Flugzeugen berücksichtigt. Nur so ist ein Erfolg und eine Weiterentwicklung möglich. Das stetig wachsende bring dich zu einer guten Ernte.

  • @ivanramiroalmaralesvargas5265
    @ivanramiroalmaralesvargas5265 2 роки тому

    Very nice informations thank you!!!

  • @ShinLeeChan
    @ShinLeeChan Рік тому +4

    Loved these aircrafts till Chinese became the owner!
    They still need more power 'cause engines are underpower but safe.

    • @sosochio4374
      @sosochio4374 11 місяців тому

      The Chinese owner produces millions of vehicle wheels and rims annually and is the OEM for many automakers worldwide. I would suggest you throw your car's wheels away if you really don't like the Chinese owner and maybe throw your wife's car's wheels or even your parents' because those wheels probably came from that Chinese owner. Be a grown-up, don't say things that are stupid.

    • @deepg7084
      @deepg7084 10 місяців тому

      It's a deal breaker for me.

    • @rwolfhaus1234
      @rwolfhaus1234 3 місяці тому

      Think the bigger issue is that China is not a free country. Should avoid supporting (i.e. buying) from them whenever possible.

  • @BlackPantherStudios
    @BlackPantherStudios 2 роки тому +1

    South Africa aviation would be a wonderful sight to see. Great video

  • @heaye
    @heaye Рік тому

    Which have pressured cabin ?

  • @chutorosushi1925
    @chutorosushi1925 2 роки тому +1

    Beautiful diamond aircraft and design.hope the prices and come down abit to let more people able to own this plane

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  2 роки тому

      Indeed! That would be amazing.

    • @Tinker1950
      @Tinker1950 2 роки тому

      Which 'plane' - five were mentioned

    • @ShinLeeChan
      @ShinLeeChan Рік тому

      The DA62 isn't too costly if you think all the features it has. And it comes with 2 engines just in case. :)
      DA42 is the top for those who can't afford 1.2M+, it has also low maintenance and consumption.

  • @abhiyudaysrivastav3683
    @abhiyudaysrivastav3683 Рік тому

    Very well done

  • @albertvonschultz9137
    @albertvonschultz9137 2 роки тому

    I have been thinking about buying the da40 and also the da62

  • @totosukatendel9209
    @totosukatendel9209 2 роки тому

    Good idea if the figures mentioned , displayed in the screen.

  • @md.moinulislam9467
    @md.moinulislam9467 2 роки тому

    Cool video.....

  • @drampadreg1386
    @drampadreg1386 2 роки тому +1

    24 gallons of fuel for a plane doing 150 knots or so these days is not fuel efficient, 13 is. I've seen on 10 GPH@ 184 Kts as well, it was a Lancair.

    • @wesleyhall2719
      @wesleyhall2719 2 роки тому +1

      I believe that was total fuel capacity

    • @dirkschwartz1689
      @dirkschwartz1689 Рік тому

      @@wesleyhall2719 Indeed. They misleadingly say "uses up to" but they give the numbers for total max. fuel on board for each aircraft.

  • @debbies3763
    @debbies3763 2 роки тому +1

    BEAUTYFUL AND THE RANGE IS GREAT 4 PASSANGER BUT A BIT UNDERPOWERED , LANCEAIR OR GLASAIR ARE FLYING AT 300MPH EVEN AN OLD MOONEY FLYS OVER 200MPH TRIPS IN THESE SMALL FIBERGLASS ROCKETS SHOULD QUICK.

  • @kresimirmilisa5560
    @kresimirmilisa5560 2 роки тому +2

    model number 3 is good.

  • @matthewbrinker6615
    @matthewbrinker6615 2 роки тому +4

    My comment is for all of them. Too damn expensive and China holdings. Never going to get one now even if I ever get the money for one.
    I get afford aviation anymore.

  • @hungrysurfer9471
    @hungrysurfer9471 Рік тому

    DA62 can have longer range tanks fitted.

  • @cpe1704tks.
    @cpe1704tks. 2 роки тому

    Question. What is the significance of naming it a "62?" What is the hidden connection?

    • @5CGQ
      @5CGQ 2 роки тому

      6 seats, 2 engines.

    • @antoniog9814
      @antoniog9814 2 роки тому +6

      @@5CGQ So the DA50 is 5 seats, 0 engines?

    • @5CGQ
      @5CGQ 2 роки тому +7

      @@antoniog9814 Sounds about right.

    • @jay_b..
      @jay_b.. 2 роки тому +1

      @@5CGQ Its got 7 seats and 2 engines. The model numbers do not correlate exactly. The zero means single engine and the 2 means twin engine. The first digit is the sequence in the range starting with 4.
      So DA40 is the start of the range and has a single engine and DA62 is the top of the range and has 2 engines.

    • @Boris_Chang
      @Boris_Chang 2 роки тому +1

      If you add six to two, you can count that number of measures going backwards into Helter Skelter to hear John say: “I buried Paul again”.

  • @easternwoods4378
    @easternwoods4378 2 роки тому +6

    Too bad Diamond was sold to the Chinese.

    • @pistaf618
      @pistaf618 2 роки тому

      Cirrus is also Chinese owned.

    • @ackerkartoffel8627
      @ackerkartoffel8627 Рік тому

      Well, china can still import the Russian emgine

  • @nasosnasos8054
    @nasosnasos8054 2 роки тому +1

    Love love

  • @djehanprabowo2495
    @djehanprabowo2495 2 роки тому

    12345 good diamond aircraft 👍😁

  • @manuelpavoarce
    @manuelpavoarce 5 місяців тому

    Me encanta , que aviones tan buenos, como me gustaría aprender con practica a pilotar uno de esos fantásticos aviones. El problema es económico. Además tendria que aprender empezando por lo mas fácil . como un párvulo. No la gramática. empezando con un simulador de vuelo. claro. ingles partiendo de cero. No empezando por la Gramática

  • @ezequielrussian392
    @ezequielrussian392 2 роки тому +3

    Rating all models of diamond : I have worked on da 40 all the way to 62 and I got to say innovation wise they are there new technology they are there but in my opinion they are aircraft that are too expensive for what they offer .
    First no one bigger than 5'7 can sit comfortably in any model .
    Second , as far as durability and maintenance these planes have to be extensively inspected where no diamond service center has a good maintenance team that practices good maintenance that is why I left and I choose not to work these airframes.
    Third, still in maintenance the manuals are free but alot of the times are missing alot of information and you have to call diamond support. Also parts can't be stocked perhaps and or as an example as a shop to stock parts that usually break you have to order on a need basis I don't know if this has changed I hope so .
    Fourthly , based on these points I consider diamond aircraft too expensive with parts , planes as what they offer you can easily buy a twin turbo prop with that type price tag with a sacrifice of burning more fuel and being more comfortable .

    • @gq12o
      @gq12o 2 роки тому

      Thanks for your insight. What would you purchase?

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  2 роки тому

      That's absolutely great input. Thanks for sharing!

    • @renard8137
      @renard8137 2 роки тому

      And to add: Diamond Aircraft Industries is owned by China; a partner off Russia. These aircrafts are manufactured in Austria, a country stating neutrality in the barbaric unlawful war against Ukrainian sovereignty.

    • @ezequielrussian392
      @ezequielrussian392 2 роки тому

      @@gq12o it actually depends for what I need it for. aircraft are not the type of vehecles that if you cannot afford you must have . To me they require two simple things time and money . Having said that just on the safekeeping of picking an aircraft for purchase I would pick a beechcraft bonanza it is roomy for 4 people and luggage yes you burn more gas but you are more comfortable .

  • @themrjim1953
    @themrjim1953 8 місяців тому

    where are the prices ????

  • @СулиманАбдулхаджиев-ш4к

    👍👍👍

  • @Karim-en9on
    @Karim-en9on 2 роки тому

    Ok nice

  • @FelixSamulevich
    @FelixSamulevich Рік тому

    One word is not mentioned if it have right for PARACHUTE implanted Last one if not to notice so taile have to be longer

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      If we understood your comment correctly, yes, the inclusion of a BRS is included in the aircraft certification. It adds an extra layer of reassurance during flights. Are there specific aircraft models with parachute systems that you find particularly interesting?

    • @FelixSamulevich
      @FelixSamulevich Рік тому

      @@AviationFederation I believe so presentation of simulation of using of safe system in extreme situation cane be interesting for potential customer . Thank you for notice .

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      @@FelixSamulevich You're most welcome and we appreciate the comments! We're passionate about the topic of parachute systems as a standard feature of most small general aviation aircraft. For us, the safety record is very promising so far.

  • @tdgdbs1
    @tdgdbs1 Рік тому

    Fuel burn and fuel capacity are two different metrics.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      You're absolutely right. Fuel burn and fuel capacity are indeed two distinct metrics when it comes to aircraft. Both metrics are important considerations for flight planning and operational efficiency.

  • @skylane1829
    @skylane1829 2 роки тому +24

    Own by the Chinese?………you lost me

    • @katprowler6805
      @katprowler6805 2 роки тому

      Y? are you a racist?

    • @jay_b..
      @jay_b.. 2 роки тому +1

      Does it matter? Most things including iPads are built in China….

    • @pistaf618
      @pistaf618 2 роки тому +3

      Cirrus is also Chinese owned.

    • @semiprofessional8470
      @semiprofessional8470 2 роки тому +1

      They own or are buying everything

    • @renejr2296
      @renejr2296 Рік тому +3

      Damn shame...this whole damn country and damn near every last citizen in it is up for Chinese purchase 🤦🏾‍♂️

  • @julieredmon1521
    @julieredmon1521 Рік тому

    How does anyone afford a million dollar plane? The payments would be more than my harley and house payments combined. Would love to have one but too rich for my blood.

  • @OMA254
    @OMA254 Рік тому

    Lots of inaccuracies! In the pictures and the facts.

  • @nasosnasos8054
    @nasosnasos8054 2 роки тому +1

    Price ?

  • @emilioalvarez9059
    @emilioalvarez9059 2 роки тому

    me encanta

  • @ditto1958
    @ditto1958 Рік тому

    Composite = plastic?

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      Not exactly. Depending on the manufacturer, it can be any combination of carbon fibre, polyethylene laminates, and sometimes with metal/alloy substructures.

  • @satguy
    @satguy 2 роки тому +4

    I was a fan until I found out it was Chinese owned.

    • @danblumel
      @danblumel 2 роки тому +2

      Cirrus is also Chinese owned.

    • @satguy
      @satguy 2 роки тому +1

      @@danblumel That explains the left-handed joystick.

    • @danblumel
      @danblumel 2 роки тому +1

      @@satguy that was done years before a Chinese company bought Cirrus.

    • @satguy
      @satguy 2 роки тому +1

      @@danblumel I just don't like side stick aircraft. Give me a center console type stick, dual wheel, or old school dual sticks.

  • @amgguy4319
    @amgguy4319 Рік тому

    Gosh, the Austrians knew how to design. But it's now Chinese, and we should all do our best to avoid Chinese...

  • @billyhillk5726
    @billyhillk5726 2 роки тому

    Made for short folks. Not being prejudiced here. They're just not practical for anyone over about 5'6/7".

  • @degraham9198
    @degraham9198 2 роки тому

    Reckon you could fly that on one engine if
    you had to? I guess it
    would vary with payload. No cheesecake for Deanna, boo hiss.

  • @gdotone1
    @gdotone1 Рік тому

    it looks cramped. man! it is a great looking plane but it could be bigger.

  • @gurbinderkaur6548
    @gurbinderkaur6548 Рік тому

    👍🏻

  • @stanislawfaron7810
    @stanislawfaron7810 2 роки тому

    👍

  • @HappymanRH
    @HappymanRH Рік тому

    😊

  • @foramericam1097
    @foramericam1097 2 роки тому +1

    Pretty planes but not worth the price!! The ASTRO is crap underpowered overpriced! The 62 is well over a million and there is other planes that have better performance for less!!

    • @jay_b..
      @jay_b.. 2 роки тому

      There are always planes with better performance… but are they more fuel efficient and run on plain cheap diesel?

  • @thesecret7330
    @thesecret7330 Рік тому

    Chinese😢😮😮😮no please don't say that 😢😢😢😢

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      We understand; learning Diamond Aircraft is Chinese-owned can be surprising. Is there something specific about Diamond's history or planes that you're fond of?

  • @goldenaye3
    @goldenaye3 2 роки тому

    They don't have toilets

  • @jhaymanmyles2226
    @jhaymanmyles2226 2 роки тому +1

    Soon as I heard owned by a chinese holding group at the beginning of the video i stopped watching

  • @Okefenokee_Nole
    @Okefenokee_Nole Рік тому

    10:10 $1.2 million is too much for only 192 knots. I need 225 knots at that price.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      Indeed, the price point of $1.2 million may not meet your expectations for the speed you desire. However, it's important to keep in mind that there are other factors to consider when purchasing an aircraft, such as range, comfort, and avionics. It may be worth exploring other options that better fit your speed requirements and budget.

  • @robertmacombo8767
    @robertmacombo8767 Рік тому

    What a great shame, from austrian to chinese.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      Indeed, Diamond Aircraft's transition from being an Austrian company to having Chinese ownership is a significant change in the industry. Changes in ownership can bring both opportunities and challenges, and it's understandable that such transitions can evoke various sentiments among aviation enthusiasts. It remains to be seen how the transition to Chinese ownership will impact the future direction and offerings of Diamond Aircraft.