On this channel you are free to disagree with what the videos say, but if you can't make your point without being personally abusive, you will get blocked. Simples.
There is only One GOD and Yeshua or Jesus is His Anointed One. I believe Jesus died in the cross and now is in the presence of THE MOST HIGH! I have faith in Jesus. I look up to Him as my Lord. His way, His truth and His life must be observe. While here on earth, He help sick people, forget about the others He did if that extreme to you, but no single record that He broke the law of the authority of that time He didn't even say He was GOD or equal to the FATHER!, in fact He even rebuke the one claiming the owner of this world saying "it is written thou shall worship The LORD thy GOD, and HIM only thou shall serve!". That statement is for all creation including Him! (see proverbs 8 : 22 - 31). There is only ONE GOD and Jesus is HIS Son! Thou shall love the LORD thy GOD with all thy heart and with all thy soul and with all thy might. Love thy neighbors as you Love thy self. This are all for the benefit of mankind! Universe has a many mystery. Those who seek must continue to seek, until he finds, when he finds, he will be troubled, when he troubled he will marvel!
What was the purpose of Jesus's resurrection? That is the most important question. That answer makes the Gospel truly unique. Non of the pagan gods mythical deaths was about salvation for mankind and non was about the fulfillment of sacrificial law. The myths of their deaths benefit the one who allegedly died, but the death and resurrection of Jesus is for the benefit of all mankind.
For GOD so loved the Humanity that HE sent Lord Yeshua HIS first born to lead us and get through to HIS DOMAIN and be with HIM for Eternity. Believe in Yeshua, Have faith in Yeshua Thank Him, give Him Honor for He Sacrifice a lot, and set a standard so we could not go astray on our way home. Hear OUR FATHER's VOICE in Him, and Acknowledge Him as Lord! And give all the Glory and Highest Praises and Honor TO OUR TRUE SAVIOR AND MERCIFUL FATHER, YAHUAH ( I AM HE - THE SELF EXISTENT - ONE ) Amein and Amein!
The theory of borrowing from pagan myths: the critics use documents dated AD 175 and much later. These documents number usually only 1 or even none (vanish), so they don't have the textual accuracy of the New Testament 99.5% - you need a great number of manuscripts to compare. The NT has 5,000, far more than any other handwritten document, in Greek alone; 24,000 total in other languages. These 'pagan myths' then are from the second century .. according to such a theory, documents should precede the first century New Testament. A popular myth is the Da Vinci Code. 98% (at least) of that is bunk. Yet, it is an example of air castle scholarship that the general public believes. Example, the Priory of Sion in the DVC is a known hoax, exposed by the French government: Pierre Plantard ... ditto the '80 books banned by the church' for political reasons ... Constantine, gnostics (again, 2nd century documents and later) ... Gospel of Thomas AD 150 and later: Mary and Jesus married ... this 'gospel' with zero connection with the real Thomas. "Fabricating Jesus - How Modern Scholars Distort the Gospels,' Dr. Craig Evans ... also his editing of 'When God Became Jesus,' top refutation of Dr. Bart Ehrman's 'When Jesus Became God.'
As an open minded Christian I can only speak of the absolute supernatural nature of the truth of a risen Christ. I have seen the evil beyond the dimensions that physically exist. I love Jesus, but I personally have seen manifestations of the evil ones. When i call for Him in the midst of the darkness a supernatural God intervenes. I have seen it in others lives which were transformed. I pray if you read this and ever experience that which a human to call upon Jesus and watch Him transform darkness in to light. Many So called Christians don't know Him. Find out for yoursel and ask God to reveal Him. I pray for your supernatural experience so you too will know He has risen, and he loves you.
So... Why did christians attach December 25th to the birthday of their god? Certainly the NT reference of the birthing of lambs at the time of the birth must indicate spring time, not the dead of winter.
TheLookingOne Does the date of Christmas have anything to do with the story of Jesus? We need to keep in mind that back then, people didn't have anything like the same amount of discretionary time as we do. If you were a slave (most of the early Christians were) - you didn't knock off work in the evening - you were at your owner's beck and call all the time. Perhaps the only large chunks of free time that people had were at the major festivals - which means the pagan festivals. So isn't it possible that they adopted Saturnalia as a convenient opportunity to celebrate the birth of Christ, without this implying very much at all about when Jesus was born?
@@brandonburrell8517 hundreds went to their death believing Jim Jones was a savior. So using your logic...Jim Jones was a savior. Doesn't make much sense does it?
@@drewhunt9205 Hundreds were poisoned in Ghana, yes. A great tragedy. They didn't die proclaiming the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. They died, isolated in fear, under threat, against their will. It is completely different.
@@brandonburrell8517 not all those in ghana died against their will. some went on their own volition. who were these eyewitnesses who went to their deaths?
It is a “ view held by scholars” Richard Carrier is one of the best religious scholars. DM Murdok was a great scholar. Everyone of them will tell you that Judeo Christianity is influenced by previous religions. There is no “ great evidence” that Jesus rose from the dead. There’s really no secular evidence that Jesus even existed. What evidence is there of him? What secular( not religious) evidence is there that he existed? Lots of archeology has found a lot of artifacts from the first century about life in that era. Yet what’s interesting is there has been no archeological evidence of Jesus ever found. No Roman records, no hyrogliphics, no statues, no anything. Don’t you find that a little odd? Tons of evidence of first century philosophers and writers etc has been discovered but none of Jesus??? Christianity was not even made into a religion until the middle of the third century. Is it possible Jesus is just a figure of literature? Christians are largely uneducated of their true origins. They think Mark, Mathew, Luke and John were written by Mark, Mathew, Luke, and John and nothing is further from the truth. Yes Christianity is influenced by previous mythology
The greatest evidence of resurrection is within a person. A God who loves us so much in life will do everything to have us with him beyond this life. Ofcourse, this becomes real to those who've experienced God. The resurrection can only seen through the eyes of faith. God is choosing those he wants to have with him. Therefore, those who humble themselves and put their faith in him see him and see the resurrection through the eyes of the witnesses. Bear in mind, that faith in God includes obedience to him, which is where it is different from simply believing. God will not try to prove himself. He IS and leaves it to us to see or not. In that sense the resurrection can never be proved outside the realm of faith.
I agree with you that the resurrection of Jesus calls for a response of personal faith and commitment. However, I do think there are also historical facts, available to anyone who looks at them carefully, which show that Jesus really was raised from the dead. In this sense, faith isn't a leap in the dark; it is a commitment based on real evidence.
"God is chosing those he wants..." Well, that's very Calvinistic/predestinational. What this means, then, is that the only ones to whom Salvation is gjven are the ones that are already picked out ahead of time. In other words, Nobody has a choice. The murderer could be one of the "chosen" while the pastor is going to burn forever. Faith has nothing to do with it, it's all about the Luck Of The Draw. Nice theology.
My question here would be: Since the Jews of the 1st-century BC and thereafter were not at all expecting a dying and/or rising Messiah, why would we imagine that the early Christians would ever think to make up such a story in the first place?!?
If you are not dead in the first place, you are not coming back from the dead, are you? Even secular historians who are not Christians are confident that Jesus really was killed by the Romans.
Crucifixion usually took about three days. Jesus was on the cross for all of nine hours. There are countless examples of people declared dead waking up again.
@@Ralphieboy - well maybe. (I don't think there are actually that many.) But certainly not for people who have been killed by professional soldiers. The Roman army was very good at killing people. It was what they did.
You want to believe that they killed him, so I will not argue specifics with you about a story that somebody wrote down centuries ago based on events decades after the fact.. My thoughts are simply that if he really got up and walked away from his tomb, he was never quite dead in the first place, despite the efforts of Rome's finest...
@@Ralphieboy Is there any evidence - evidence that we might reasonably have for a historical event two thousand years ago - that would move you to re-think this?
chritianity may not have borrowed their story from another religion, but the fact that there was other religions at the time with the same sort of ideas show that that was the culture and was popular belief at the time, and that is why the gospels were written that way
In NT Wright's book 'The Resurrection of the Son of God,' he shows that the other stories with 'the same sort of ideas' really weren't that similar at all.
And why must we so fervently work to prove that the idea of Jesus is true, oh so true and that any other idea is unacceptable? Why? What are we clinging to here? What are we afraid of? Why is this idea of so much importance? From what I've heard of Jesus, he was operating from his heart, not so much his head.
@@MrDW-ei1fe Debunked years ago and proven fraudulent. Try again. Would you like a link posted or can you find it on your own? It's a simple Google search.
@@melokulelekankumalo3402 did you watch the link you posted? He literally says at worst the second part mentioning Jesus is what Josephus wrote that has Christian additions and specifically does NOT discredit the entire passage.
@@MrDW-ei1fe My purpose in posting the link was simply to expose the fact that there are only two passages and both appear to have been altered by Christian scholars after the fact. Yes I did watch the video. I just find it difficult to understand that outside of the Bible we have Tacitus and Josephus "only" as validation of a Jesus and both appear to have been altered by Christian scholars/Monks. The Bible also speaks of Jews being held captive in Egypt. The very meticulous record keeping Egyptians of the time have no such record. When you add in Ptolemy I Soter, and Serapis Christus 135 BCE, I am inclined to know that Jesus in the biblical sense never existed. I would never think of "validating" the Bible with its own "scriptures." I won't bother you with the ecumenical councils that were held to craft the religion. I'm sure you already know those. It's great communicating with you though. I have an educational day. Ase'🙏🏿
If it were borrowed or made up in any way, why would Paul, Peter, and the others not recount their story rather than die? It is rather dumb to claim it is a sham.
1:45 - - William Lane Craig, lying as usual. Jesus is a myth. He isn't mentioned by a single Greek or Roman historian, religious scholar, politician, poet or philosopher until 80 Years after his death. Ie Pliny of Alexandria around 112AD. Even then doesn't even name him jesus he just refers to his name "Chrestos" in passing. Early Christians converted on people telling them stories. The gospels were only written much much later from about 70AD onwards. In a nutshell, Jesus is a myth, and if I'm wrong please provide good evidence that he did exiet
More evidence for Jesus than for just about any other person in the ancient world, and evidence from writers nearer to the time he lived: ua-cam.com/video/EsJWNrqqpO8/v-deo.html
William Lane Craig just starts talking about the disciples as if they obviously existed but it's quite clear in creating the Jesus stories the disciples might easily have been invented as well. The Roman empire had plenty of reasons to invent something to control the masses and the general violence associated with all religious ideas being forced into people at the whims of the dictators should make us very sceptical of all such claims.
I am always amused when people say that Christians believe things without any evidence. There is not a shred of evidence that the Roman empire invented Christianity, nor did they need to - they controlled people, brutally, by force of arms. They did not encourage people to worship Jesus - they encouraged people (effectively at the point of a sword) to worship the emperors. If you are going to claim that the stories about Jesus and his followers were made up, you need to be able to explain *when* they were made up, and *how* they managed to be spread among people who must have known they were false. What you are claiming is very naive historically, and I do not know of any serious historians of the Roman empire who would agree with you.
It doesnot make sense they said jesus was crusified in 3 days rose in 3 days. Meaning sunday he was resurected. Did you in jews it is not allowed to punish or persecute or continue persecutions. Meaning he should ve been removed first to the cross before saturday. Or else he was died in cross before saturday or rised at saturday
You are absolutely right. This is exactly what Christians say. Not only that, but it is the centre of the Christian message. So Paul the apostle writes (in 1 Corinthans 15:5...) 'I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day...' Jesus died as a sacrifice for the sin and guilt of his people. He was raised (by God, supernaturally) in a way that vindicates him completely. Nothing is more important than this.
@@godnewevidence "If There Is a God, Why Are There Atheists?" "I created man and woman with original sin. Then I destroyed most of them for sinning. Then I impregnated a woman with myself as her child, so that I could be born. Later, I will kill myself as a sacrifice to myself to save all of you from the sin I gave you in the first place."
The Titan Titanic argument is so whack. The Titan did not or could not have cause the Titanic. The question is are these similar stories influencing each other, not wow look how similar these stories are.
Galatians 6 : 7 - 9 " Don't deceive yourselves ; no one can make a fool of God ; whatever a man sows this he will also reap. He who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap Life eternal."
Sure there are similarities between religions and Christianity yes I get that but you have to look at it in a case-by-case basis show me another one where Jesus actually appeared to multiple people after and now remember Jesus and all the disciples and all the followers were Jewish it was on ceremonial to believe that somebody would be resurrected before the end of time when cryo and God would resurrect everybody so what would make them all die and get stoned in martyred for something that's an illusion or something they lied about
Yah ALONE: Job 9:8 Which ALONE spreadeth out the heavens, and treadeth upon the waves of the sea. (That rules out Jesus being the creator or walking on water.) Isaiah 2:11 The lofty looks of man shall be humbled, and the haughtiness of men shall be bowed down, and YHWH ALONE shall be exalted in that day. (last days, see verse 2, wait a minute, you mean no bowing down to Jesus/Yeshua in the last days?) Isa 2:17 And the loftiness of man shall be bowed down, and the haughtiness of men shall be made low: and YHWH ALONE shall be exalted in that day. (last days, see verse 2, wait a minute, no exalting Jesus/Yeshua in the last days?) Psalms 148:13 Let them praise the name of YHWH: for HIS NAME ALONE is excellent; his glory is above the earth and heaven. (Rules out Jesus/Yeshua’s name being the ONLY name given whereby we must be saved, that’s a complete lie.) Nehemiah 9:6 Thou, even thou, art YHWH ALONE; thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host, the earth, and all things that are therein, the seas, and all that is therein, and thou preservest them all; and the host of heaven worshippeth thee. (What? No Jesus/Yeshua was beside him participating in the creation? This text totally obliterates John 1:1-3 “1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.”) Isaiah 37:16 O YHWH of hosts, Elohim of Israel, that dwellest between the cherubims, thou art the Elohim, even THOU ALONE, of all the kingdoms of the earth: thou hast made heaven and earth. Isaiah 44:24 Thus saith YHWH, THY REDEEMER, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am YHWH that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens ALONE; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself. (WHAT? No Jesus/Yeshua next to him, creating all things THROUGH Him?) Deuteronomy 32:12 So YHWH ALONE did lead him, and there was no strange god with him. (This text is letting us know there was no other divine god some call the son of god, only YHWH leading them. Interesting that YHWH is calling the other god a ‘strange’ god when He says ‘no strange god’ was with Him, that should tell you something.)
'Jesus has more extended text about him, in generally closer proximity to his life, than his contemporary [the Roman Emperor] Tiberius, the most famous person in the then-known world.' (PeterJ. Williams, 'Can We Trust the Gospels?')
Yes, there is ample evidence outside the Bible to give credence to the fact that Jesus was a living, breathing man of the First Century. It's almost ludicrous to suggest otherwise and displays an arrant ignorance of the topic.
@@scotscotland3020 Ok, you win. Nobody ever saw Jesus, there's nothing mentioned about Him, EVER, anywhere in antiquity. The Bible is all lies, all made up, all 66 books it contains are all a big scam to control the people, it was all a BIG conspiracy between all of those people who lived in different times and in different places. I know I know, I'm just a fool for thinking any of that could POSSIBLY have any foundation in fact. It's all one BIG hoax. Ya, right. Sure it is. Hrmmph!
@@godnewevidence Is there any evidence outside the bible that Jesus existed? Thanks! Also is the below verses contradictions? Acts 9:7 King James Version (KJV) 7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, HEARING A VOICE, but SEEING NO MAN. Acts 22:9 King James Version (KJV) 9 And they that were with me SAW INDEED the light, and were afraid; but they HEARD NOT THE VOICE of him that spake to me.
If the resurrection was the only myth legend it could possibly be dismissed..but there are so many other myth connections. Listen to Richard Carriers videos for more myth connections.
2 Samuel 7:22 Wherefore thou art great, O YHWH God: for there is NONE LIKE THEE, NEITHER is there any God [Elohim] BESIDE THEE, according to all that we have heard with our ears. (This text 100% rules out Jesus/Yeshua being the “express image of His person”, that’s New Testament or sitting on the Right hand of the Father; another proof that Jesus is not the same being as the Father.) 1 Kings 8:22-23 “22 And Solomon stood before the altar of the LORD in the presence of all the congregation of Israel, and spread forth his hands toward heaven: 23 And he said, LORD God of Israel, THERE IS NO GOD LIKE THEE, IN HEAVEN ABOVE OR ON EARTH BENEATH, who keepest covenant and mercy with thy servants that walk before thee with all their heart:” (Jesus was supposedly LIKE God, NOT!)
We, in Islam have all charectors as Jesus son of Marry, John the Baptist, Zikria, Marriam mother of Jesus, holy spirit, Allah the creator, but our narrative is totally different then the christains one, though as a monothiest, it's more alligned to the Jewish believe
Exactly. However, they will be saying that it was all hallucinations or the gradual development of a myth. But wait, that has been debunked decades ago.
@@ewankerr3011 I was an atheist many years before Al Gore invented it.Although I have done a lot of independent research and a few college courses on religion, it doesn't take an expert to recognize bullshit when you see it.
@Seeker of the truth Married or not, the bigger question is why are all these gods having babies with human women. Zeus + Alcmene, god + Mary, fallen angels and human women (Nephilim) etc. What, are there no available women in the supernatural realm? LOL. I suppose anything is possible in fantasy land
@Seeker of the truth Nephilim: Genesis 6:4 "The Nephilim were on the earth in those days-and also afterward-when the sons of God went in to the daughters of humans, who bore children to them. These were the heroes that were of old, warriors of renown."
Deuteronomy 24:16 The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers; every man shall be put to death for his OWN sin. (Jesus cannot die for our sins, we must die for our own sins, someone else taking your own punishment goes against Yah’s word) Hosea 13:4 Yet I am YHWH thy Elohim from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know NO god BUT ME: for there is NO SAVIOUR beside me. (rules out Jesus/Yeshua as being a savior)
NOBODY KNOWS FOR SURE ABOUT THE MYSTIC JESUS LIFE. NONE OF U PEOPLE WERE THERE AS EYE WITNESS. THERE'S A POSSIBILITY THAT IF SATAN EXIST, HE MIGHT BE PLAYING WITH THE HUMAN MIND. ALL THIS IS BASED ON SIMPLE FAITH .
I don't know whether you are serious about thinking about the historical evidence, or whether you are just trolling. If you are serious, I recommend this book: www.amazon.co.uk/Can-Trust-Gospels-Peter-Williams/dp/1433552957/ref=sr_1_1?crid=180Q2HJALLETY&keywords=can+we+trust+the+gospels+peter+williams&qid=1637666318&qsid=257-4583787-2031424&sprefix=Williams+can+we+%2Caps%2C186&sr=8-1&sres=1433552957%2C0802874312%2C1985794470%2C1581348665&srpt=ABIS_BOOK
Jesus was not historical, instead more "storical". 1st: there is no explicit resurrection doctrine in the Hebrew Tanakh. YHVH has no condition of resurrection as reward for the righteous and morally straight. 2nd: Resurrection was a concept originated from Persians, same reason why Sadducees do not believe in resurrection(since nothing is written in 5 books of Moses) 3rd: there is no prophecy for a hebrew messiah king to die without redeeming, or delivering the nation from peace, order, and oppression from foreign yoke. 4th messianic idea and concept was only heightened during two historical time of oppression by Antiochus Epiphanes and during the tyrannical ruling of non-jew(Idumean) Herodians, a Roman Empire puppet. 5th: A true jewish messiah is a restorer of sovereignty and unity among his people, but jesus is contrary to this, but instead sower of discord(divisive and sectarian), a destroyer of Temple, compared to messiah Cyrus who was moved by YHVH to be the restorer of the Temple. 6th: all prophetic usage of NT writers and authors were out of context from the hebrew Bible context. Example: Isaiah 7:14 >>> the child being carried by the young woman that conceived has to be witnessed(seen) by king Ahaz, since this was the sign promised by YHVH GOD of Israel through Isaiah to be relayed to Ahaz. The reason being is that kingdom of Judah were having fear of the alliances of the northern kingdom with Assyria in destroying the southern kingdom Judah. This child was the child BORN and GIVEN(as sign) for Ahaz, and its the child Hezekiah, that set the kingdom of Judah with peace, without fear, and order for the 25 years of Hezekiah's reign. People in their time have seen him as a truly anointed(messiah) one.
The Lord Jesus fulfilled more than 300 prophecies written hundreds to thousands years before AD. Historically we have no excuse to reject Him as the risen Savior.
Do they really believe what they are saying? If their conscience and common sense that God gave them tells them the Gospels are based or borrowed from myths and they teach them as literal, are they not guilty of lying? They are unable to teach these myths as lessons, some mystical, because they would lose their positions. Ask a Jew if he believes the Gospels are in a Judaic background, Jesus faith has been corrupted by Paul and Greco Roman influence. The true teachings of Jesus are there, although obscured.
A lot of videos on this channel explore the historical evidence for the reliability of the Bible accounts. E.g this series ua-cam.com/play/PLegZ3cdgTQ8zph-OReOEk3e_fNZcvcSol.html
1 Samuel 2:2 There is NONE holy as YHWH: for there is NONE BESIDE thee: neither is there any rock like our God. (Jesus was considered the “rock”, and BESIDE the right hand of the Father, NOT).
Intellectual dishonesty at its finest how you interpret it is what it says on the page and the fact that these myths have similar mythological structure and and similar stories says it all that should be enough for anyone to be very skeptical of the Jesus mythology.
@@godnewevidence Although somewhat entertaining this is remedial nonsense, and the fact It is presented in a cartoon tells me everything I need to know about its dishonesty. The fact is there are similar mythologies throughout History and this only addresses a couple of the many hundreds, some thousands of years before Christianity. The creation myths, flood myths, and savior gods and powerful gods and gods of different elements of nature, And the connection to astro theology Have been going on for thousands of years before Christianity Humanity makes up stories. Check out Osirus Tammuz ,adonis ,attis, Dionysis, ziusudra, Astra-hasis,and Sumerian creation myths. The fact that Christianity claims some type of uniqueness is laughable. It has no more valid a claim than any of the other mythologies and religions and nonsense stories that have been made up by man for millennia it's not special cause it's Jesus.
@@davidhodge5112 (1) A crucial difference is that there is historical evidence for the origins of Christianity. The mythology stories are just that - myths, not set in a specific time or place, and... (2) I've heard lots of people talk about similarities between Christianity and various myths. When you start to look closer, either the similarities evaporate completely, or they turn out not to be all that close in the first place. So my challenge to you would be this: can you identify several *specific* close parallels between Christianity and myths? Oh, and one other problem - I'd like *specific* original source evidence, not just internet memes.
@@godnewevidence Obviously you have a bad case of intellectual dishonesty And confirmation bias yourself and have obviously never researched the source material either, The Jesus mythology is just exactly that mythology!! and it's not special because it's Jesus, We live in the information age all it takes is a simple Google search you will come up with dozens of similar mythological stories of different gods Throughout history Most thousands of years before Christianity was ever even spoken about . Flood myths Are common throughout history, So are creation myths. They do not have to be exact Or be literary dependent to prove that this is similar mythological structure to the Jesus mythology. archeological geographical and text Evidence Do in fact exist for the other pagan myths that I have Mentioned . The code of hamurabi being similar to the 10 commandmentsmany thousands Years before Christianity people lived and died believing these gods were real just like you believe yours is but isn't. and your feeble attempt at an ad hominem It's laughable, I don't get any of my source material from Internet memes. The fact is Christianity quite simply just is not true. it provides no evidence for its claims in fact its claims are absurd and ridiculous The kicker is you have to believe this Impossible nonsense for no good reason or you will be thrown into a lake of fire for an eternal conscious torment in fire because God loves you it's nonsense.So I encourage you to Google Bible inaccuracies and contradictions for one. Then Google pagan mythology similar to the Christian mythology you will be enlightened. Plenty of source material from every relevant field of study from scientists phD archeologists And many biblical scholars Some Christian and some atheist.
I have done 40 years of research, and have found facts that I can hold in my hand and see with my eye's..! Where is your sold facts, that I may hold, see, touch. Or are you as much of a fairy tale as your words..?
Christianity at it's core goes against the Tanakh! All of christianity is pagan if you believe there is a divine son of God! There is none and has never been anyone except the Most High God, one and only God!
it's the first time I watch a video that has no like or dislike thump up or down( I refer to the video, not to the comments thumps of readers between themselves). So I will give you a huge thump DOWN. Don't tell me to go to facebook, I loathe the page.
I'll put my money on the Power of God. You can look at your fables and your tales, but the Bible is Truth. Gamble if you want, but I'm sticking with Jesus. And by the way, how in the world do you think that this universe got so big? Again, I'm putting my money on the Power of God.
On this channel you are free to disagree with what the videos say, but if you can't make your point without being personally abusive, you will get blocked. Simples.
+God Thanks for the tip.
+WhipperJesus
"WITHOUT BEING PERSONALLY ABUSIVE"
WhipperJesus clearly he was he said don't disrespect simple
@WhipperJesus2
There is only One GOD and Yeshua or Jesus is His Anointed One. I believe Jesus died in the cross and now is in the presence of THE MOST HIGH! I have faith in Jesus. I look up to Him as my Lord. His way, His truth and His life must be observe. While here on earth, He help sick people, forget about the others He did if that extreme to you, but no single record that He broke the law of the authority of that time He didn't even say He was GOD or equal to the FATHER!, in fact He even rebuke the one claiming the owner of this world saying "it is written thou shall worship The LORD thy GOD, and HIM only thou shall serve!". That statement is for all creation including Him! (see proverbs 8 : 22 - 31).
There is only ONE GOD and Jesus is HIS Son!
Thou shall love the LORD thy GOD with all thy heart and with all thy soul and with all thy might.
Love thy neighbors as you Love thy self.
This are all for the benefit of mankind!
Universe has a many mystery.
Those who seek must continue to seek, until he finds, when he finds, he will be troubled, when he troubled he will marvel!
What was the purpose of Jesus's resurrection? That is the most important question. That answer makes the Gospel truly unique. Non of the pagan gods mythical deaths was about salvation for mankind and non was about the fulfillment of sacrificial law. The myths of their deaths benefit the one who allegedly died, but the death and resurrection of Jesus is for the benefit of all mankind.
Thanks for the video , so what is the best contemporary eyewitness for the resurrection to support the Bible ?
No scholars today think Jesus' story is a pagan myth say what???
Thank you very much to godnewevidence for sharing. GBU and greetings from Indonesia.
For GOD so loved the Humanity that HE sent Lord Yeshua HIS first born to lead us and get through to HIS DOMAIN and be with HIM for Eternity.
Believe in Yeshua, Have faith in Yeshua Thank Him, give Him Honor for He Sacrifice a lot, and set a standard so we could not go astray on our way home. Hear OUR FATHER's VOICE in Him, and Acknowledge Him as Lord! And give all the Glory and Highest Praises and Honor TO OUR TRUE SAVIOR AND MERCIFUL FATHER, YAHUAH ( I AM HE - THE SELF EXISTENT - ONE )
Amein and Amein!
The theory of borrowing from pagan myths: the critics use documents dated AD 175 and much later. These documents number usually only 1 or even none (vanish), so they don't have the textual accuracy of the New Testament 99.5% - you need a great number of manuscripts to compare. The NT has 5,000, far more than any other handwritten document, in Greek alone; 24,000 total in other languages. These 'pagan myths' then are from the second century .. according to such a theory, documents should precede the first century New Testament.
A popular myth is the Da Vinci Code. 98% (at least) of that is bunk. Yet, it is an example of air castle scholarship that the general public believes. Example, the Priory of Sion in the DVC is a known hoax, exposed by the French government: Pierre Plantard ... ditto the '80 books banned by the church' for political reasons ... Constantine, gnostics (again, 2nd century documents and later) ... Gospel of Thomas AD 150 and later: Mary and Jesus married ... this 'gospel' with zero connection with the real Thomas.
"Fabricating Jesus - How Modern Scholars Distort the Gospels,' Dr. Craig Evans ... also his editing of 'When God Became Jesus,' top refutation of Dr. Bart Ehrman's 'When Jesus Became God.'
Yes indeed. Look for our series 'Jesus Myths,' and 'Conspiracies and Secret Gospels,' which feature Craig Evans at length.
Excellent communication of history! Thanks!
As an open minded Christian I can only speak of the absolute supernatural nature of the truth of a risen Christ. I have seen the evil beyond the dimensions that physically exist. I love Jesus, but I personally have seen manifestations of the evil ones. When i call for Him in the midst of the darkness a supernatural God intervenes. I have seen it in others lives which were transformed. I pray if you read this and ever experience that which a human to call upon Jesus and watch Him transform darkness in to light. Many So called Christians don't know Him. Find out for yoursel and ask God to reveal Him. I pray for your supernatural experience so you too will know He has risen, and he loves you.
Christopher Phillips that's a fact they don't know him cause they cold hearted Jesus says they will not have the kingdom o well
So...
Why did christians attach December 25th to the birthday of their god?
Certainly the NT reference of the birthing of lambs at the time of the birth must indicate spring time, not the dead of winter.
TheLookingOne Does the date of Christmas have anything to do with the story of Jesus? We need to keep in mind that back then, people didn't have anything like the same amount of discretionary time as we do. If you were a slave (most of the early Christians were) - you didn't knock off work in the evening - you were at your owner's beck and call all the time. Perhaps the only large chunks of free time that people had were at the major festivals - which means the pagan festivals. So isn't it possible that they adopted Saturnalia as a convenient opportunity to celebrate the birth of Christ, without this implying very much at all about when Jesus was born?
There is a pretty good on this subject titled PAGAN RESURRECTION MYTHS AND THE RESURRECTION OF JESUS: A CHRISTIAN PERSPECTIVE by Leon McKenzie.
3:50- Enormous historical evidence? Like what, exactly?
duke3478 The eyewitnesses, who went to their deaths proclaiming the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
@@brandonburrell8517 hundreds went to their death believing Jim Jones was a savior. So using your logic...Jim Jones was a savior. Doesn't make much sense does it?
@@drewhunt9205 Hundreds were poisoned in Ghana, yes. A great tragedy. They didn't die proclaiming the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. They died, isolated in fear, under threat, against their will. It is completely different.
@@brandonburrell8517 not all those in ghana died against their will. some went on their own volition. who were these eyewitnesses who went to their deaths?
@@SuperSglenn Whoever they were, they were not Christians. Peace.
Yet again, I've had to block someone because they can't keep it civil. What is it about this that is so hard to understand?
It is a “ view held by scholars” Richard Carrier is one of the best religious scholars. DM Murdok was a great scholar. Everyone of them will tell you that Judeo Christianity is influenced by previous religions.
There is no “ great evidence” that Jesus rose from the dead. There’s really no secular evidence that Jesus even existed. What evidence is there of him? What secular( not religious) evidence is there that he existed? Lots of archeology has found a lot of artifacts from the first century about life in that era. Yet what’s interesting is there has been no archeological evidence of Jesus ever found. No Roman records, no hyrogliphics, no statues, no anything. Don’t you find that a little odd? Tons of evidence of first century philosophers and writers etc has been discovered but none of Jesus??? Christianity was not even made into a religion until the middle of the third century. Is it possible Jesus is just a figure of literature? Christians are largely uneducated of their true origins. They think Mark, Mathew, Luke and John were written by Mark, Mathew, Luke, and John and nothing is further from the truth. Yes Christianity is influenced by previous mythology
On the question of who wrote the Gospels: ua-cam.com/video/DHo_TuWqIcQ/v-deo.html
Again this is entirely false. Where are you getting your information? Very curious and I would very much like to check out these sources.
The greatest evidence of resurrection is within a person. A God who loves us so much in life will do everything to have us with him beyond this life. Ofcourse, this becomes real to those who've experienced God.
The resurrection can only seen through the eyes of faith. God is choosing those he wants to have with him. Therefore, those who humble themselves and put their faith in him see him and see the resurrection through the eyes of the witnesses. Bear in mind, that faith in God includes obedience to him, which is where it is different from simply believing. God will not try to prove himself. He IS and leaves it to us to see or not. In that sense the resurrection can never be proved outside the realm of faith.
I agree with you that the resurrection of Jesus calls for a response of personal faith and commitment. However, I do think there are also historical facts, available to anyone who looks at them carefully, which show that Jesus really was raised from the dead. In this sense, faith isn't a leap in the dark; it is a commitment based on real evidence.
"God is chosing those he wants..." Well, that's very Calvinistic/predestinational. What this means, then, is that the only ones to whom Salvation is gjven are the ones that are already picked out ahead of time. In other words, Nobody has a choice. The murderer could be one of the "chosen" while the pastor is going to burn forever. Faith has nothing to do with it, it's all about the Luck Of The Draw. Nice theology.
My question here would be: Since the Jews of the 1st-century BC and thereafter were not at all expecting a dying and/or rising Messiah, why would we imagine that the early Christians would ever think to make up such a story in the first place?!?
the question is why there is no followers of these previous saviours? where are they? can a man copy miracle, unless he himself can perform miracle?
no followers? There were-and still are- many pagans that follow old gods.
If you are dead and come back, then it just means you weren't fully dead in the first place. What is so hard to understand about that?
If you are not dead in the first place, you are not coming back from the dead, are you? Even secular historians who are not Christians are confident that Jesus really was killed by the Romans.
Crucifixion usually took about three days. Jesus was on the cross for all of nine hours. There are countless examples of people declared dead waking up again.
@@Ralphieboy - well maybe. (I don't think there are actually that many.) But certainly not for people who have been killed by professional soldiers. The Roman army was very good at killing people. It was what they did.
You want to believe that they killed him, so I will not argue specifics with you about a story that somebody wrote down centuries ago based on events decades after the fact..
My thoughts are simply that if he really got up and walked away from his tomb, he was never quite dead in the first place, despite the efforts of Rome's finest...
@@Ralphieboy Is there any evidence - evidence that we might reasonably have for a historical event two thousand years ago - that would move you to re-think this?
Excellent explanations...
chritianity may not have borrowed their story from another religion, but the fact that there was other religions at the time with the same sort of ideas show that that was the culture and was popular belief at the time, and that is why the gospels were written that way
In NT Wright's book 'The Resurrection of the Son of God,' he shows that the other stories with 'the same sort of ideas' really weren't that similar at all.
I said same sort of idea not that it was exactly the same
Brendan Knox then you can't say this is why they were written with any certainty.
And why must we so fervently work to prove that the idea of Jesus is true, oh so true and that any other idea is unacceptable? Why? What are we clinging to here? What are we afraid of? Why is this idea of so much importance? From what I've heard of Jesus, he was operating from his heart, not so much his head.
If Jesus did rise from the dead, that would seem to be important :-)
Where IS the "historical evidence" of Jesus existence? Outside of Sripture?
Josephus and Tacitus
@@MrDW-ei1fe Debunked years ago and proven fraudulent. Try again. Would you like a link posted or can you find it on your own? It's a simple Google search.
@@MrDW-ei1fe I will help you with one.
ua-cam.com/video/f9J599VBEZI/v-deo.html
Take care and have educational day.
@@melokulelekankumalo3402 did you watch the link you posted? He literally says at worst the second part mentioning Jesus is what Josephus wrote that has Christian additions and specifically does NOT discredit the entire passage.
@@MrDW-ei1fe My purpose in posting the link was simply to expose the fact that there are only two passages and both appear to have been altered by Christian scholars after the fact. Yes I did watch the video. I just find it difficult to understand that outside of the Bible we have Tacitus and Josephus "only" as validation of a Jesus and both appear to have been altered by Christian scholars/Monks. The Bible also speaks of Jews being held captive in Egypt. The very meticulous record keeping Egyptians of the time have no such record. When you add in Ptolemy I Soter, and Serapis Christus 135 BCE, I am inclined to know that Jesus in the biblical sense never existed. I would never think of "validating" the Bible with its own "scriptures." I won't bother you with the ecumenical councils that were held to craft the religion. I'm sure you already know those. It's great communicating with you though. I have an educational day. Ase'🙏🏿
If it were borrowed or made up in any way, why would Paul, Peter, and the others not recount their story rather than die? It is rather dumb to claim it is a sham.
We have only limited evidence about these guys' lives. Being willing to die for a cause doesn't make it factually true or morally sound.
1:45 - - William Lane Craig, lying as usual.
Jesus is a myth. He isn't mentioned by a single Greek or Roman historian, religious scholar, politician, poet or philosopher until 80 Years after his death. Ie Pliny of Alexandria around 112AD. Even then doesn't even name him jesus he just refers to his name "Chrestos" in passing.
Early Christians converted on people telling them stories. The gospels were only written much much later from about 70AD onwards.
In a nutshell, Jesus is a myth, and if I'm wrong please provide good evidence that he did exiet
More evidence for Jesus than for just about any other person in the ancient world, and evidence from writers nearer to the time he lived: ua-cam.com/video/EsJWNrqqpO8/v-deo.html
Yeah, because the Romans needed an unknown Jewish prophet to do what their huge and brutal army couldn't do :-)
Yeah, right :-)
What is?
What reason would there be for these people to make it up? If they believed that Christ was a Myth, then they would have never mentioned him.
William Lane Craig just starts talking about the disciples as if they obviously existed but it's quite clear in creating the Jesus stories the disciples might easily have been invented as well. The Roman empire had plenty of reasons to invent something to control the masses and the general violence associated with all religious ideas being forced into people at the whims of the dictators should make us very sceptical of all such claims.
I am always amused when people say that Christians believe things without any evidence. There is not a shred of evidence that the Roman empire invented Christianity, nor did they need to - they controlled people, brutally, by force of arms. They did not encourage people to worship Jesus - they encouraged people (effectively at the point of a sword) to worship the emperors. If you are going to claim that the stories about Jesus and his followers were made up, you need to be able to explain *when* they were made up, and *how* they managed to be spread among people who must have known they were false. What you are claiming is very naive historically, and I do not know of any serious historians of the Roman empire who would agree with you.
im only here to say to you please give Jesus a chance i promise He will make Himself known to you cz thats just the way He rolls🕊
It doesnot make sense they said jesus was crusified in 3 days rose in 3 days. Meaning sunday he was resurected. Did you in jews it is not allowed to punish or persecute or continue persecutions. Meaning he should ve been removed first to the cross before saturday. Or else he was died in cross before saturday or rised at saturday
What they did is not necessarily what they should have done, is it?
Christians say "Jesus died for you".... But also say "he rose again"...... So which is it?....
You are absolutely right. This is exactly what Christians say. Not only that, but it is the centre of the Christian message. So Paul the apostle writes (in 1 Corinthans 15:5...) 'I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day...'
Jesus died as a sacrifice for the sin and guilt of his people. He was raised (by God, supernaturally) in a way that vindicates him completely.
Nothing is more important than this.
@@godnewevidence "If There Is a God, Why Are There Atheists?"
"I created man and woman with original sin. Then I destroyed most of them for sinning. Then I impregnated a woman with myself as her child, so that I could be born. Later, I will kill myself as a sacrifice to myself to save all of you from the sin I gave you in the first place."
Jesus Christ is Lord of all.
Vidya Jesus Christ is still Lord. God bless you.
Based
The Titan Titanic argument is so whack. The Titan did not or could not have cause the Titanic. The question is are these similar stories influencing each other, not wow look how similar these stories are.
Galatians 6 : 7 - 9 " Don't deceive yourselves ; no one can make a fool of God ; whatever a man sows this he will also reap. He who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap Life eternal."
Reaching.
Sure there are similarities between religions and Christianity yes I get that but you have to look at it in a case-by-case basis show me another one where Jesus actually appeared to multiple people after and now remember Jesus and all the disciples and all the followers were Jewish it was on ceremonial to believe that somebody would be resurrected before the end of time when cryo and God would resurrect everybody so what would make them all die and get stoned in martyred for something that's an illusion or something they lied about
Yah ALONE:
Job 9:8 Which ALONE spreadeth out the heavens, and treadeth upon the waves of the sea. (That rules out Jesus being the creator or walking on water.)
Isaiah 2:11 The lofty looks of man shall be humbled, and the haughtiness of men shall be bowed down, and YHWH ALONE shall be exalted in that day. (last days, see verse 2, wait a minute, you mean no bowing down to Jesus/Yeshua in the last days?)
Isa 2:17 And the loftiness of man shall be bowed down, and the haughtiness of men shall be made low: and YHWH ALONE shall be exalted in that day. (last days, see verse 2, wait a minute, no exalting Jesus/Yeshua in the last days?)
Psalms 148:13 Let them praise the name of YHWH: for HIS NAME ALONE is excellent; his glory is above the earth and heaven. (Rules out Jesus/Yeshua’s name being the ONLY name given whereby we must be saved, that’s a complete lie.)
Nehemiah 9:6 Thou, even thou, art YHWH ALONE; thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host, the earth, and all things that are therein, the seas, and all that is therein, and thou preservest them all; and the host of heaven worshippeth thee. (What? No Jesus/Yeshua was beside him participating in the creation? This text totally obliterates John 1:1-3 “1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.”)
Isaiah 37:16 O YHWH of hosts, Elohim of Israel, that dwellest between the cherubims, thou art the Elohim, even THOU ALONE, of all the kingdoms of the earth: thou hast made heaven and earth.
Isaiah 44:24 Thus saith YHWH, THY REDEEMER, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am YHWH that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens ALONE; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself. (WHAT? No Jesus/Yeshua next to him, creating all things THROUGH Him?)
Deuteronomy 32:12 So YHWH ALONE did lead him, and there was no strange god with him. (This text is letting us know there was no other divine god some call the son of god, only YHWH leading them. Interesting that YHWH is calling the other god a ‘strange’ god when He says ‘no strange god’ was with Him, that should tell you something.)
What historical evidence exists that Jesus died and resurrected?
We have a whole series of videos about this: ua-cam.com/play/PLegZ3cdgTQ8w6ilejjSwUZw-qvq0NDCFz.html
There is zero evidence for the character known as Jesus ever having existed during the time period in question.
'Jesus has more extended text about him, in generally closer proximity to his life, than his contemporary [the Roman Emperor] Tiberius, the most famous person in the then-known world.' (PeterJ. Williams, 'Can We Trust the Gospels?')
Yes, there is ample evidence outside the Bible to give credence to the fact that Jesus was a living, breathing man of the First Century. It's almost ludicrous to suggest otherwise and displays an arrant ignorance of the topic.
@@dougoverhoff7568 Right, but you can't actually provide any, Doug. My point still stands.
@@scotscotland3020 Ok, you win. Nobody ever saw Jesus, there's nothing mentioned about Him, EVER, anywhere in antiquity. The Bible is all lies, all made up, all 66 books it contains are all a big scam to control the people, it was all a BIG conspiracy between all of those people who lived in different times and in different places. I know I know, I'm just a fool for thinking any of that could POSSIBLY have any foundation in fact. It's all one BIG hoax. Ya, right. Sure it is. Hrmmph!
@@godnewevidence
Is there any evidence outside the bible that Jesus existed? Thanks!
Also is the below verses contradictions?
Acts 9:7 King James Version (KJV)
7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, HEARING A VOICE, but SEEING NO MAN.
Acts 22:9 King James Version (KJV)
9 And they that were with me SAW INDEED the light, and were afraid; but they HEARD NOT THE VOICE of him that spake to me.
If the resurrection was the only myth legend it could possibly be dismissed..but there are so many other myth connections. Listen to Richard Carriers videos for more myth connections.
2 Samuel 7:22 Wherefore thou art great, O YHWH God: for there is NONE LIKE THEE, NEITHER is there any God [Elohim] BESIDE THEE, according to all that we have heard with our ears. (This text 100% rules out Jesus/Yeshua being the “express image of His person”, that’s New Testament or sitting on the Right hand of the Father; another proof that Jesus is not the same being as the Father.)
1 Kings 8:22-23 “22 And Solomon stood before the altar of the LORD in the presence of all the congregation of Israel, and spread forth his hands toward heaven: 23 And he said, LORD God of Israel, THERE IS NO GOD LIKE THEE, IN HEAVEN ABOVE OR ON EARTH BENEATH, who keepest covenant and mercy with thy servants that walk before thee with all their heart:” (Jesus was supposedly LIKE God, NOT!)
Deny evidences good one
We, in Islam have all charectors as Jesus son of Marry, John the Baptist, Zikria, Marriam mother of Jesus, holy spirit, Allah the creator, but our narrative is totally different then the christains one, though as a monothiest, it's more alligned to the Jewish believe
What do you believe about Jesus?
They would have to be poorest comments in defense of mythology and Christian beliefs,
Look. If someone on the internet says that the story of the resurrection is borrowed from pagan myths then it must be true.
As Abraham Lincoln said, 'Don't believe everything you read on the Internet' :-)
Exactly. However, they will be saying that it was all hallucinations or the gradual development of a myth. But wait, that has been debunked decades ago.
@@ewankerr3011 No it hasn't. What has been debunked is the existence of most of the O.T. characters i.e. Moses, Joshua, etc.
@@MrChiangching Well, you are obviously the expert and if it says so on the internet we know it must be true. LOL !
@@ewankerr3011 I was an atheist many years before Al Gore invented it.Although I have done a lot of independent research and a few college courses on religion, it doesn't take an expert to recognize bullshit when you see it.
Im faithful Christian i love what they saying💓💓😂😂
I believe that Jesus never died but did go to heaven that is why he is going to return.
See also: ua-cam.com/video/BNr9hjN5WYg/v-deo.html
Only the material body dies. The person of Jesus is eternal; always was and always will be.
Zeus + Alcmene = Hercules
God + Mary = Jesus
Coincidence? I think not.
@Seeker of the truth
Married or not, the bigger question is why are all these gods having babies with human women. Zeus + Alcmene, god + Mary, fallen angels and human women (Nephilim) etc.
What, are there no available women in the supernatural realm? LOL. I suppose anything is possible in fantasy land
@Seeker of the truth
Nephilim: Genesis 6:4 "The Nephilim were on the earth in those days-and also afterward-when the sons of God went in to the daughters of humans, who bore children to them. These were the heroes that were of old, warriors of renown."
@Seeker of the truth The Nephilim were the children of fallen angels and human women as Hercules was the offspring of Zeus and Alcmene.
@Seeker of the truth
Zoom didn't work.
@Seeker of the truth I tried this again but it failed
Deuteronomy 24:16 The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers; every man shall be put to death for his OWN sin. (Jesus cannot die for our sins, we must die for our own sins, someone else taking your own punishment goes against Yah’s word)
Hosea 13:4 Yet I am YHWH thy Elohim from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know NO god BUT ME: for there is NO SAVIOUR beside me. (rules out Jesus/Yeshua as being a savior)
@Chico 1985 I like the hebrew bible with Tanakh only, the New Testament is a "story" only, written by Rome. Why did you ask?
no
NOBODY KNOWS FOR SURE ABOUT THE MYSTIC JESUS LIFE. NONE OF U PEOPLE WERE THERE AS EYE WITNESS. THERE'S A POSSIBILITY THAT IF SATAN EXIST, HE MIGHT BE PLAYING WITH THE HUMAN MIND.
ALL THIS IS BASED ON SIMPLE FAITH .
I don't know whether you are serious about thinking about the historical evidence, or whether you are just trolling. If you are serious, I recommend this book: www.amazon.co.uk/Can-Trust-Gospels-Peter-Williams/dp/1433552957/ref=sr_1_1?crid=180Q2HJALLETY&keywords=can+we+trust+the+gospels+peter+williams&qid=1637666318&qsid=257-4583787-2031424&sprefix=Williams+can+we+%2Caps%2C186&sr=8-1&sres=1433552957%2C0802874312%2C1985794470%2C1581348665&srpt=ABIS_BOOK
Jesus was not historical, instead more "storical". 1st: there is no explicit resurrection doctrine in the Hebrew Tanakh. YHVH has no condition of resurrection as reward for the righteous and morally straight. 2nd: Resurrection was a concept originated from Persians, same reason why Sadducees do not believe in resurrection(since nothing is written in 5 books of Moses) 3rd: there is no prophecy for a hebrew messiah king to die without redeeming, or delivering the nation from peace, order, and oppression from foreign yoke. 4th messianic idea and concept was only heightened during two historical time of oppression by Antiochus Epiphanes and during the tyrannical ruling of non-jew(Idumean) Herodians, a Roman Empire puppet. 5th: A true jewish messiah is a restorer of sovereignty and unity among his people, but jesus is contrary to this, but instead sower of discord(divisive and sectarian), a destroyer of Temple, compared to messiah Cyrus who was moved by YHVH to be the restorer of the Temple. 6th: all prophetic usage of NT writers and authors were out of context from the hebrew Bible context. Example: Isaiah 7:14 >>> the child being carried by the young woman that conceived has to be witnessed(seen) by king Ahaz, since this was the sign promised by YHVH GOD of Israel through Isaiah to be relayed to Ahaz. The reason being is that kingdom of Judah were having fear of the alliances of the northern kingdom with Assyria in destroying the southern kingdom Judah. This child was the child BORN and GIVEN(as sign) for Ahaz, and its the child Hezekiah, that set the kingdom of Judah with peace, without fear, and order for the 25 years of Hezekiah's reign. People in their time have seen him as a truly anointed(messiah) one.
The Lord Jesus fulfilled more than 300 prophecies written hundreds to thousands years before AD. Historically we have no excuse to reject Him as the risen Savior.
Thanks God for your post
It's a bonze age myth.
jesus=isus=siha=ishwara hindu god no death.hebrew no j.j=i.
it is lie Jesus not raise of dead
So what do you think did happen?
Do they really believe what they are saying? If their conscience and common sense that God gave them tells them the Gospels are based or borrowed from myths and they teach them as literal, are they not guilty of lying? They are unable to teach these myths as lessons, some mystical, because they would lose their positions. Ask a Jew if he believes the Gospels are in a Judaic background, Jesus faith has been corrupted by Paul and Greco Roman influence. The true teachings of Jesus are there, although obscured.
Been there, done that: ua-cam.com/video/AbmAXxLNaCg/v-deo.html
jesus story is a Myth a Fable
A lot of videos on this channel explore the historical evidence for the reliability of the Bible accounts. E.g this series ua-cam.com/play/PLegZ3cdgTQ8zph-OReOEk3e_fNZcvcSol.html
1 Samuel 2:2 There is NONE holy as YHWH: for there is NONE BESIDE thee: neither is there any rock like our God. (Jesus was considered the “rock”, and BESIDE the right hand of the Father, NOT).
Imbalanced
Intellectual dishonesty at its finest how you interpret it is what it says on the page and the fact that these myths have similar mythological structure and and similar stories says it all that should be enough for anyone to be very skeptical of the Jesus mythology.
ua-cam.com/video/s0-EgjUhRqA/v-deo.html
@@godnewevidence Although somewhat entertaining this is remedial nonsense, and the fact It is presented in a cartoon tells me everything I need to know about its dishonesty. The fact is there are similar mythologies throughout History and this only addresses a couple of the many hundreds, some thousands of years before Christianity. The creation myths, flood myths, and savior gods and powerful gods and gods of different elements of nature, And the connection to astro theology Have been going on for thousands of years before Christianity Humanity makes up stories. Check out Osirus Tammuz ,adonis ,attis, Dionysis, ziusudra, Astra-hasis,and Sumerian creation myths. The fact that Christianity claims some type of uniqueness is laughable. It has no more valid a claim than any of the other mythologies and religions and nonsense stories that have been made up by man for millennia it's not special cause it's Jesus.
@@davidhodge5112 (1) A crucial difference is that there is historical evidence for the origins of Christianity. The mythology stories are just that - myths, not set in a specific time or place, and... (2) I've heard lots of people talk about similarities between Christianity and various myths. When you start to look closer, either the similarities evaporate completely, or they turn out not to be all that close in the first place. So my challenge to you would be this: can you identify several *specific* close parallels between Christianity and myths? Oh, and one other problem - I'd like *specific* original source evidence, not just internet memes.
@@godnewevidence Obviously you have a bad case of intellectual dishonesty And confirmation bias yourself and have obviously never researched the source material either, The Jesus mythology is just exactly that mythology!! and it's not special because it's Jesus, We live in the information age all it takes is a simple Google search you will come up with dozens of similar mythological stories of different gods Throughout history Most thousands of years before Christianity was ever even spoken about . Flood myths Are common throughout history, So are creation myths. They do not have to be exact Or be literary dependent to prove that this is similar mythological structure to the Jesus mythology. archeological geographical and text Evidence Do in fact exist for the other pagan myths that I have Mentioned . The code of hamurabi being similar to the 10 commandmentsmany thousands Years before Christianity people lived and died believing these gods were real just like you believe yours is but isn't. and your feeble attempt at an ad hominem It's laughable, I don't get any of my source material from Internet memes. The fact is Christianity quite simply just is not true. it provides no evidence for its claims in fact its claims are absurd and ridiculous The kicker is you have to believe this Impossible nonsense for no good reason or you will be thrown into a lake of fire for an eternal conscious torment in fire because God loves you it's nonsense.So I encourage you to Google Bible inaccuracies and contradictions for one. Then Google pagan mythology similar to the Christian mythology you will be enlightened. Plenty of source material from every relevant field of study from scientists phD archeologists And many biblical scholars Some Christian and some atheist.
Nice try😂
I have done 40 years of research, and have found facts that I can hold in my hand and see with my eye's..! Where is your sold facts, that I may hold, see, touch. Or are you as much of a fairy tale as your words..?
Christianity at it's core goes against the Tanakh! All of christianity is pagan if you believe there is a divine son of God! There is none and has never been anyone except the Most High God, one and only God!
it's the first time I watch a video that has no like or dislike thump up or down( I refer to the video, not to the comments thumps of readers between themselves). So I will give you a huge thump DOWN. Don't tell me to go to facebook, I loathe the page.
Why the thumbs down?
Historical Evidence. LOL
I'll put my money on the Power of God. You can look at your fables and your tales, but the Bible is Truth. Gamble if you want, but I'm sticking with Jesus. And by the way, how in the world do you think that this universe got so big? Again, I'm putting my money on the Power of God.