If you had to pick between the CX-50 and the CX-5, which would you choose? Let us know below. Be sure to check out our coverage of the CX-50 here: edmu.in/3IyIhcm
@@deuce07er it definitely does feel underpowered, like the Honda CRV. After test driving the Acura RDX and the BMW X3 however, I would put the CX-50 Premium Plus Turbo against those cars anyday of the week.
@@PrestenSPapel Funny you bring up the RDX. The cx 50 is a nice vehicle but it's not as roomy or as powerful as the RDX not too mention the handling if you get the sh-awd option. The Mazda's interior is also so bland and plain also Honda as you know is the premium brand of Acura so the quality is there. As for Mazda they have gotten better since collaborating with Toyota. I would personally choose the Acura over the Mazda but that's just my personal preference and is the reason I didn't buy the cx 50.
I ordered a CX-5 Signature and I was awaiting reviews on the CX-50 to validate my choice. I live in the city, and the extra width without commensurate extra space in the CX-50 would be a hindrance, and although I appreciate good handling, I think I'd prefer the smoother and quieter option. It's interesting that I've heard different reviewers flip-flop on the ride comfort of the CX-50 vs CX-5, but I trust your take on the experience. Thank you for your thoughtful drive and review!
I bought a CX-5 recently since in knew I would be commuting in the city. Handling is great, easy to park, and a kick when needed to speed up. No regrets. The CX-50 looks great no doubt. I’m with you, not sure the width would work for me.
I was also wondering what the ride quality would be like. I had an Outback XT and it was so comfortable. What made me sell it was the infotainment was terrible. I test drove the 2021 CX5 Signature and found it to not be as comfortable as the Outback XT, but it was fun to drive. I'm hoping the CX-50 would make it a little less top heavy since it's shorter and wider, but I agree about the parking in the city aspect of the width. I'm currently considering the CX-50/CX-5 and the Honda Passport. Any experience with Hondas?
@@racso5628 I'm not sure if you're asking me about Hondas, but I'll answer anyway. :) I had a 2019 CX-5 before and after it was damaged, I swapped to a 2021 Honda Accord Touring. The driving characteristics were wonderful, but it had some rattles the dealership couldn't fix and experienced a lot of road noise which definitely made it feel cheaper. Overall, it felt like a class down from the CX-5 and Mazda6 I had before it. Plus, the Accord's CMBS slammed on the brakes on me twice at highway speeds, both times nearly causing me an accident, where the brake pedal wouldn't release from its lock when I tried to intervene since it prematurely activated. To me, a premium feel is important, so you should try out the Passport to see if it meets expectations!
I picked up my new CX-50 last Thursday. Before that I had a CX-5 (traded it in for this). Yes, the CX-50 is wider but to be fair, it is actually about the same. Reason is that the CX-50 has mirrors set in from the widest point of the body while the CX-5 has mirrors which stick out more. The Premium Plus Turbo trim has 360 surround cameras which make parking and tight spaces easier to navigate than the CX-5 at least for me. I honestly can not tell any difference between the ride quality/noise in the two. Main difference on sound is that the CX-50 has a truly awesome Bose sound system with is the best I've ever heard in any car. Ever.
@@solitarysky734 thanks for your information,maybe I am wrong but as I know the 50 had couple more inches wider than the 5 ,that’s make me think about which one I am going to pick,mostly in city a lot of people doubt park,and the street was narrow a tight to go through,that’s made me real hard to pick,actually I like the 50 more than the 5 because 50 more space and looks more attractive to me
Before choosing a CX50 you should consider the following: 1. The GT’s 20” rims and standard Goodyears (Canada) cannot be considered an off-road tire. Hopefully it works in winter but you don’t have much tread depth. 2. This is no competitor to a Subaru product as there is no suspension travel, little ground clearance and a metric tonne-load of plastic under the Mazda (can you find the oil filter DIY’s) 3. Fussy interior: Beautiful sure but it marks so easily and that surface around the shifter is hard to clean and scratches so easily. 4. How do you clean the heads-up display that sits in the well in the dash and do you find the display in the glass distorted or clear? 5. Don’t count on great mileage and oil change intervals seem to be more frequent. 6. Body: so many crevices to trap sand and salt over winter = early rust potential? Just wondering (had literally miles of weather strip components) 7. Rear storage: Disappointing! The problem is the roof height. If you travel with small family consider bringing empty luggage to the dealership. You may find a CX5 works better as luggage can stand vertically back to back. Try it! 8. Purchase experience: Maybe this is happening every where but freight and PDI seems greatly inflated and acting like a surcharge. 9. Ergonomics: Not bad. Glad to see some buttons but the stitching on the steering wheel isn’t smooth, spokes are awkward and grip width at the 9 and 3 position aren’t good. You might agree after 500 miles. 10. Seats. Be sure you are ok with the Mazda designed butt-floss. This is weird and should be changed mid-production. Seats are hard. 11. Look hard at the CX5 before you buy the 50.
Just test drove this vehicle. They’re hard to find so I was lucky I found one at a nearby Mazda dealership. After watching this review I was determined to find one and purchase it. Msrp was $39,000 for premium package.Dealer had it for $41,380 with destination fee ,with an additional $3,000 mark up.Total out the door price came out to $49,995 with taxes ,reg, doc fees. Talked them down to $47,500. Had too make this deal before I even test drove the vehicle. They wouldn’t let me test drive it otherwise. After test driving it I backed out of the deal, in my opinion it’s not a $47,000+ vehicle. Acceleration was ok,ride was a little ruff and the vehicle felt heavy,handling was above average but not anything special. Best thing for me was the Bose audio system which sounds amazing !! Yes it’s a beautiful suv…but for the right price, definitely not for $47,500. If you’re in the market for this suv don’t over pay for it especially if your financing it. Tops I would pay for this suv is around $44,000-45,000 out the door.
@@fakebrake ha ha you got a good deal ,I am wondering is it different states got the different prices ,I was living in NEW YORK ,as I knew only the government taxes and vehicles registered fees was 3000 dollars already
Mo - I picked up my new CX-50 last Thursday. I am not at all bothered by the stitching. To my ear (and I do not have very good hearing) I don't notice any difference between the CX-5 and the CX-50. Perhaps the CX-50 is a touch quieter than the 2017 CX-5 I traded in for it. What I DO hear a difference on is the fantastic Bose sound system. Easily the best sound quality I've heard in any car. Ever. The one thing which does annoy me is that (and you can see this in the video when off roading) Mazda's design is such that LOTS of dust is thrown up on the back and completely covers the rear window whenever you go several miles on gravel or dry dirt roads.
@@solitarysky734 Thank you so much for your reply. I hope I can pick up my CX-50 soon. With the issue of the dust, my previous car (Subaru Outback) had that problem too. It is a little annoying, but not a big deal at all. Al the best and warm regards.
@@michaelp.3485 - I am not sure exactly what piece of information I wrote that you don't believe. If you read my entire post you would notice that I spoke about both some positive and negative issues. You are correct that people are biased. Not only owners are biased; people who have driven or owned other Mazdas and know how reliable and fun to drive they are in general would be biased towards the brand. People who haven't owned or driven a Mazda might also be biased AGAINST any Mazda. I have written on other UA-cam videos that I suspect the Subaru all wheel drive system might well be superior to Mazda's AWD (Subaru has had many more years to perfect their system) and I've also mentioned some aspects of the CX-5 which I feel are better than the CX-50. So if you don't think you can trust my experience, why not just go and drive one for yourself? Almost any car has both people who enjoy it and other people who don't like it. Much of that can be subjective, especially which elements of a car are important to you. If cargo space or gas mileage are more important than driving experience or interior design to someone, then Honda's CR-V might be a much better choice than a Mazda CX-50. Everyone should use their own judgement. I simply wrote what I had found to be true from my own driving experience.
Great review! I've heard other reviewers comment on the noticable road noise. It may have to do with those 20 inch wheels. That was one of my concerns. Hopefully we'll get to see some reviews of the lower trims with the 17 inch wheels so we can compare.
I just traded my CX 30 select s for the CX 50 select s ,it comes with the 17 inch wheels.For my taste it rides more cushioned than my old CX 30 with the 18 inch wheels.
I, and my adult sons, are 6'2" and we would have to be contortionists to fit in the back seat. Seriously, my head was hitting the headliner while checking this vehicle out in the showroom and I had to prime myself out. The reviewer claims to be 5'8" and over time, as we age, we do get shorter and I think that's the case with this gentleman. Seriously, this is a small vehicle for taller individuals. In the video you can see that the driver seat was moved nearly as far forward as possible. I fit much more comfortable in my CX-5. Looking forward to the CX-70.
The ride and noise that you mentioned are due to the huge wheels! And did you even check the tire pressure? They make a big difference you know. Just get the lower trim with smaller wheels and you shouldn't have these complains.
I have the Toyota Yaris Hatchback, basically a rebadged Mazda 2. I love the car - fun to drive, fuel efficient and has just the right amount of tech. My biggest gripe is how LOUD the car is at highway speeds. I take long road trips and really hope the CX-50 is at least quieter than my Yaris, else that’s a deal breaker.
You should have zero worry about that. The CX-50 is not anywhere near as noisy as the Yaris. It is not as quiet as high end luxury cars which are priced well above it, but I do not find it at all difficult. The incredible Bose sound system on the Premium Plus Turbo trim is sooo awesome that you won't hear any noise when music is playing!
I swear Honda pays you to pimp that CRV. I drove a crv for 6 months in 2018 and it was the most mindless, boring, uninspired appliance I’ve ever driven. It also leaked gas into the oil, wouldn’t warm up, and was slow. I traded it for a rav4 which looked miles better, but still lacked engagement in driving. Just got a new cx50 and it’s miles better than anything else. Fun to drive, quality materials, and everything I’d want I am suv. It drives like a sports car.
I just bought the 2023 CX-50. I found the CX-5 a little boring…. To me when the ride is softer and quieter it becomes boring. I don’t want to drive a Lazyboy chair. In the past I have had 2 BMW X3’s. This SUV is not that far off the mark without having to pay 50k+. This SUV just puts a smile on my face.
Press was only provided with the top trim at this event, which is not uncommon in the car industry since the car companies want to forcibly provide the best possible impression of their products. They could choose not to go, but then they'd lose out against their competitors. Some people will probably review the lower trims once they have access.
Agreed. I got the preferred plus because I wanted black wheels and no piano black crap inside. It’s quiet, fun to drive, and looks amazing. Comfortable seats and a ton of features.
Nice car. Wanna take a look at one and check the seating comfort and position. And I gotta say, I like the long hair and facial hair. It's a good look for you!
I seriously don't get all this confusion, why do these people mix things up, cx50 is a separate vehicle it has nothing to do with cx5, they are completely different vehicles and cx50 is only for the North American market. Why do you think something that'll be sold solely in the US and Canada will discontinue a different vehicle that's the best selling of the company worldwide? Also i own a cx50 turbo with premium plus package, and this vehicle is fantastic in every way. and no! the stitching on the seats will not go up your butt crack, it's also pretty quick and enjoyable to drive. Lane keep will work over 40mph, but it's not as strong, but it'll correct you and vibrate the steering wheel so you'll know you're departing your lane.
@@ianmcculloch6839 It's a lot more dependable than the crappy chain/belt CVT's. Newer tech isn't always better for the end user - and if you read up on this SkyActiv 6-AT you will find out that it has some cool updated design touches to it (which certain review mechanics have deemed "brilliant") that improve it a lot over the 6-AT of yesteryear.
The smaller vehicle architecture (3, CX-30, CX-50) are FWD bias. The new large architecture for the CX 70 & 90 will be the RWD bias and inline 6, with optional PHEV.
@@natlovell122 yes, but there is a difference if it rear wheel biased or front wheel biased (Land Crusier vs High Lander AWD systems). Rear wheel are sportier, and more durable. The engines are mounted longitudinally (north to south). That is why every higher tier brand of vehicle are usually rear biased. Probably cost more to make too. In Mazdas case, I believe the CX70 and 90 will be rear biased.
Thanks for a great review. I really enjoyed it. I just took delivery of a CX-30 (non turbo otherwise top of the line here in Canada) and I really like it for many of the same reasons you praised the CX-50. We are looking to replace our 2019 Tiguan with a hybrid. Do you have any sense of when a hybrid version of the CX-50 will become available? Thanks...Jim
The moonroof on this car sucks. Its panoramic but only opens about 4 inches. Headroom is terrible too. I'm 5'11 and there's not much room. Also the top of the line non turbo edition is missing some things that should be standard for a car of that price (heated rear seats, on board navigation, heated steering wheel) thats on the cx5. The HUD without onboard navigation is pretty pointless. Finally the infotainment is touch screen but to have arms long enough to reach it you'd never to be able to fit your head in the car.
Lena - Yes, the CX-50 does have current tire pressure readings for the 4 independent tires within the center display (not on the dash but in the digital display in front of the driver). No need to trash Mazda; they did an excellent job with most of the useful modern tech (like 360 surround sensors and even rear/reverse auto braking when backing up plus of course standards like head up display shown in front of the driver, adaptive cruise control, Blind spot monitoring, etc.).
@@solitarysky734 it's incredible you think I'm "trashing Mazda" just because I mentioned facts that they didn't have tire pressure readings for each tire available on the dash. It's something myself and many, many others have talked about wanting in our modern Mazdas.
@@LenaCourtney - Today I did a more extensive check of your interest in the CX-50 related to tire pressure. First, it is important to note that Mazda now offers its "My Mazda" app which, at least with the CX-50, allows you to remotely view your tire pressure (all four tires are shown independently). In car this info is also shown on the dash display under the "Maintenence" tab. Hope this helps.
In my own opinion the Kudo design language never translated well onto the crossover and SUV lineup. With that being said with the discontinued 6 and the 3 with s murkier future no Thankyou.
Stubborn Mazda forgot to put the amazing torsion beam rear suspensions to the CX50 to keep road noise down. Oh, also it is like the older Oldsmobile that the headlight is always on like people drive with high beam on because they don't know how to work the car.
They dont have much of an R&D budget to really compete in that realm. Waiting until others do the initial investment and costs come down will benefit them as their annual volume likely isnt impacted much in the interim.
This SUV will get a hybrid version based on the Rav 4 hybrid. The new large architecture SUV's will get a hybrid and PHEV option, also based on Toyota platform.
Who do you know who likes to be HONKED at and woken up? Eliminate Auto Honk with Lock!! Common Sense isn’t it? How: Press Lock and Unlock on Fob for 2-4 seconds Honk should turn off. Your dealer can assist if needed as some cars might be slightly different. Thank you!
Takahashi...one of the most biased "journalists" out there. What an awful review. Of course he is going to LOVE every Japanese vehicle...what a joke of a "review"
I drove an Hybrid RAV4 and it’s was so slow. I could care less about fuel (within reason) if I don’t have to worry about getting on the HWY and getting run over.
I drove a RAV4 Prime and it was zippy and feature-rich, but felt cheap inside and was simultaneously fast, and boring to drive. Not sure how they accomplished making something so advanced simultaneously lackluster.
@@missjanelove I WAS CONSIDERING NEW HYBRID RAV AS A MAIN CONTENDER,. BUT THERE ARE A LOT OF COMPLAINS ABOUT IT... I WILL TAKE A GAS CAR OVER THAT FOR NOW
If you had to pick between the CX-50 and the CX-5, which would you choose? Let us know below. Be sure to check out our coverage of the CX-50 here: edmu.in/3IyIhcm
for me, it's the CX5
I’d choose the Cx50, but it’s really not worth it if it isn't the turbo. The extra power is awesome.
Cx5 turbocharged.
My friend has the non turbo and it feels very underpowered.
@@deuce07er it definitely does feel underpowered, like the Honda CRV. After test driving the Acura RDX and the BMW X3 however, I would put the CX-50 Premium Plus Turbo against those cars anyday of the week.
@@PrestenSPapel Funny you bring up the RDX. The cx 50 is a nice vehicle but it's not as roomy or as powerful as the RDX not too mention the handling if you get the sh-awd option. The Mazda's interior is also so bland and plain also Honda as you know is the premium brand of Acura so the quality is there. As for Mazda they have gotten better since collaborating with Toyota. I would personally choose the Acura over the Mazda but that's just my personal preference and is the reason I didn't buy the cx 50.
I ordered a CX-5 Signature and I was awaiting reviews on the CX-50 to validate my choice. I live in the city, and the extra width without commensurate extra space in the CX-50 would be a hindrance, and although I appreciate good handling, I think I'd prefer the smoother and quieter option. It's interesting that I've heard different reviewers flip-flop on the ride comfort of the CX-50 vs CX-5, but I trust your take on the experience. Thank you for your thoughtful drive and review!
I bought a CX-5 recently since in knew I would be commuting in the city. Handling is great, easy to park, and a kick when needed to speed up. No regrets. The CX-50 looks great no doubt. I’m with you, not sure the width would work for me.
I was also wondering what the ride quality would be like. I had an Outback XT and it was so comfortable. What made me sell it was the infotainment was terrible.
I test drove the 2021 CX5 Signature and found it to not be as comfortable as the Outback XT, but it was fun to drive. I'm hoping the CX-50 would make it a little less top heavy since it's shorter and wider, but I agree about the parking in the city aspect of the width.
I'm currently considering the CX-50/CX-5 and the Honda Passport. Any experience with Hondas?
@@racso5628 I'm not sure if you're asking me about Hondas, but I'll answer anyway. :) I had a 2019 CX-5 before and after it was damaged, I swapped to a 2021 Honda Accord Touring. The driving characteristics were wonderful, but it had some rattles the dealership couldn't fix and experienced a lot of road noise which definitely made it feel cheaper. Overall, it felt like a class down from the CX-5 and Mazda6 I had before it. Plus, the Accord's CMBS slammed on the brakes on me twice at highway speeds, both times nearly causing me an accident, where the brake pedal wouldn't release from its lock when I tried to intervene since it prematurely activated. To me, a premium feel is important, so you should try out the Passport to see if it meets expectations!
I picked up my new CX-50 last Thursday. Before that I had a CX-5 (traded it in for this). Yes, the CX-50 is wider but to be fair, it is actually about the same. Reason is that the CX-50 has mirrors set in from the widest point of the body while the CX-5 has mirrors which stick out more. The Premium Plus Turbo trim has 360 surround cameras which make parking and tight spaces easier to navigate than the CX-5 at least for me. I honestly can not tell any difference between the ride quality/noise in the two. Main difference on sound is that the CX-50 has a truly awesome Bose sound system with is the best I've ever heard in any car. Ever.
@@solitarysky734 thanks for your information,maybe I am wrong but as I know the 50 had couple more inches wider than the 5 ,that’s make me think about which one I am going to pick,mostly in city a lot of people doubt park,and the street was narrow a tight to go through,that’s made me real hard to pick,actually I like the 50 more than the 5 because 50 more space and looks more attractive to me
Before choosing a CX50 you should consider the following:
1. The GT’s 20” rims and standard Goodyears (Canada) cannot be considered an off-road tire. Hopefully it works in winter but you don’t have much tread depth.
2. This is no competitor to a Subaru product as there is no suspension travel, little ground clearance and a metric tonne-load of plastic under the Mazda (can you find the oil filter DIY’s)
3. Fussy interior: Beautiful sure but it marks so easily and that surface around the shifter is hard to clean and scratches so easily.
4. How do you clean the heads-up display that sits in the well in the dash and do you find the display in the glass distorted or clear?
5. Don’t count on great mileage and oil change intervals seem to be more frequent.
6. Body: so many crevices to trap sand and salt over winter = early rust potential? Just wondering (had literally miles of weather strip components)
7. Rear storage: Disappointing! The problem is the roof height. If you travel with small family consider bringing empty luggage to the dealership. You may find a CX5 works better as luggage can stand vertically back to back. Try it!
8. Purchase experience: Maybe this is happening every where but freight and PDI seems greatly inflated and acting like a surcharge.
9. Ergonomics: Not bad. Glad to see some buttons but the stitching on the steering wheel isn’t smooth, spokes are awkward and grip width at the 9 and 3 position aren’t good. You might agree after 500 miles.
10. Seats. Be sure you are ok with the Mazda designed butt-floss. This is weird and should be changed mid-production. Seats are hard.
11. Look hard at the CX5 before you buy the 50.
Just test drove this vehicle. They’re hard to find so I was lucky I found one at a nearby Mazda dealership.
After watching this review I was determined to find one and purchase it. Msrp was $39,000 for premium package.Dealer had it for $41,380 with destination fee ,with an additional $3,000 mark up.Total out the door price came out to $49,995 with taxes ,reg, doc fees. Talked them down to $47,500. Had too make this deal before I even test drove the vehicle. They wouldn’t let me test drive it otherwise. After test driving it I backed out of the deal, in my opinion it’s not a $47,000+ vehicle. Acceleration was ok,ride was a little ruff and the vehicle felt heavy,handling was above average but not anything special. Best thing for me was the Bose audio system which sounds amazing !! Yes it’s a beautiful suv…but for the right price, definitely not for $47,500. If you’re in the market for this suv don’t over pay for it especially if your financing it. Tops I would pay for this suv is around $44,000-45,000 out the door.
I agree totally with this. It is a nice ride but not 50k nice
That's crazy. I walked into the dealership test drove one then bought one off the show room floor. Premium plus turbo for 43.
What dealer was that? That’s awful. It’s a great car but you can get it at msrp. The dealer you went to are crooks.
@@fakebrake ha ha you got a good deal ,I am wondering is it different states got the different prices ,I was living in NEW YORK ,as I knew only the government taxes and vehicles registered fees was 3000 dollars already
I love how this vehicle, along with the Toyota Corolla Cross is produced right in my hometown.
Nice job Mark! If this is this good, the CX 70 ought to be amazing especially with HEV and PHEV powertrains, inline6, and 8 speed DCT!
Many thanks for this excellent review. Two questions please: Is the stitching in the center of the seats bothersome? Is it a quiet car?
I heard you can feel the stitching on the seats.
Mo - I picked up my new CX-50 last Thursday. I am not at all bothered by the stitching. To my ear (and I do not have very good hearing) I don't notice any difference between the CX-5 and the CX-50. Perhaps the CX-50 is a touch quieter than the 2017 CX-5 I traded in for it. What I DO hear a difference on is the fantastic Bose sound system. Easily the best sound quality I've heard in any car. Ever. The one thing which does annoy me is that (and you can see this in the video when off roading) Mazda's design is such that LOTS of dust is thrown up on the back and completely covers the rear window whenever you go several miles on gravel or dry dirt roads.
@@solitarysky734 Thank you so much for your reply. I hope I can pick up my CX-50 soon. With the issue of the dust, my previous car (Subaru Outback) had that problem too. It is a little annoying, but not a big deal at all. Al the best and warm regards.
@@solitarysky734 Why would I believe you? You bought one so you are biased.
@@michaelp.3485 - I am not sure exactly what piece of information I wrote that you don't believe. If you read my entire post you would notice that I spoke about both some positive and negative issues. You are correct that people are biased. Not only owners are biased; people who have driven or owned other Mazdas and know how reliable and fun to drive they are in general would be biased towards the brand. People who haven't owned or driven a Mazda might also be biased AGAINST any Mazda. I have written on other UA-cam videos that I suspect the Subaru all wheel drive system might well be superior to Mazda's AWD (Subaru has had many more years to perfect their system) and I've also mentioned some aspects of the CX-5 which I feel are better than the CX-50. So if you don't think you can trust my experience, why not just go and drive one for yourself? Almost any car has both people who enjoy it and other people who don't like it. Much of that can be subjective, especially which elements of a car are important to you. If cargo space or gas mileage are more important than driving experience or interior design to someone, then Honda's CR-V might be a much better choice than a Mazda CX-50. Everyone should use their own judgement. I simply wrote what I had found to be true from my own driving experience.
Waiting on the upcoming Mazdas with the RWD/inline-6 platforms...
Great review! I've heard other reviewers comment on the noticable road noise. It may have to do with those 20 inch wheels. That was one of my concerns. Hopefully we'll get to see some reviews of the lower trims with the 17 inch wheels so we can compare.
The Meridian Edition has 18" wheels but comes with all terrain tires.
Get the preferred plus. 17 inch wheels and no piano black. It’s got everything and a blast to drive.
I just traded my CX 30 select s for the CX 50 select s ,it comes with the 17 inch wheels.For my taste it rides more cushioned than my old CX 30 with the 18 inch wheels.
I appreciate this balanced review. Thanks.
Mid June, can't find the Premium Plus package, especially Black & Zircon Gray color. WHY?
excellent review
tried it yesterday it's a very nice vehiculke
I, and my adult sons, are 6'2" and we would have to be contortionists to fit in the back seat. Seriously, my head was hitting the headliner while checking this vehicle out in the showroom and I had to prime myself out. The reviewer claims to be 5'8" and over time, as we age, we do get shorter and I think that's the case with this gentleman. Seriously, this is a small vehicle for taller individuals. In the video you can see that the driver seat was moved nearly as far forward as possible. I fit much more comfortable in my CX-5. Looking forward to the CX-70.
The ride and noise that you mentioned are due to the huge wheels! And did you even check the tire pressure? They make a big difference you know.
Just get the lower trim with smaller wheels and you shouldn't have these complains.
I have the Toyota Yaris Hatchback, basically a rebadged Mazda 2. I love the car - fun to drive, fuel efficient and has just the right amount of tech. My biggest gripe is how LOUD the car is at highway speeds. I take long road trips and really hope the CX-50 is at least quieter than my Yaris, else that’s a deal breaker.
You should have zero worry about that. The CX-50 is not anywhere near as noisy as the Yaris. It is not as quiet as high end luxury cars which are priced well above it, but I do not find it at all difficult. The incredible Bose sound system on the Premium Plus Turbo trim is sooo awesome that you won't hear any noise when music is playing!
@@solitarysky734 That's great to (not) hear! The CX-50 will sell like hotcakes.
As a former Toyota RAV-4 owner, I gethered that it is quieter than RAV4, and that is already an upgrade for me;-)
Who else is getting this Infiniti FX45 vibe from this car's design?
It's the stance.
Get the 17 inch version for more comfy ride
what is the location you tested ?
I swear Honda pays you to pimp that CRV. I drove a crv for 6 months in 2018 and it was the most mindless, boring, uninspired appliance I’ve ever driven. It also leaked gas into the oil, wouldn’t warm up, and was slow.
I traded it for a rav4 which looked miles better, but still lacked engagement in driving. Just got a new cx50 and it’s miles better than anything else. Fun to drive, quality materials, and everything I’d want I am suv. It drives like a sports car.
Base on the mazda3 and CX-30 so no independent rear suspension?
That's a let down.
I just bought the 2023 CX-50. I found the CX-5 a little boring…. To me when the ride is softer and quieter it becomes boring. I don’t want to drive a Lazyboy chair. In the past I have had 2 BMW X3’s. This SUV is not that far off the mark without having to pay 50k+. This SUV just puts a smile on my face.
Exactly. I feel the same. These mindless, soft boring crossovers are lame. I love the cx50. It reminds me why I love to drive again.
Why don’t reviewers test the trim most people are likely to buy? Kind of a fail to test the turbo.
Press was only provided with the top trim at this event, which is not uncommon in the car industry since the car companies want to forcibly provide the best possible impression of their products. They could choose not to go, but then they'd lose out against their competitors.
Some people will probably review the lower trims once they have access.
Agreed. I got the preferred plus because I wanted black wheels and no piano black crap inside. It’s quiet, fun to drive, and looks amazing. Comfortable seats and a ton of features.
Nice car. Wanna take a look at one and check the seating comfort and position.
And I gotta say, I like the long hair and facial hair. It's a good look for you!
Interesting, so far every review says that it is at the very least quiter than Rav-4
It is. I’ve had a rav and the cx50 drives miles better and is actually fun.
Is this Hybrid? ✅
I seriously don't get all this confusion, why do these people mix things up, cx50 is a separate vehicle it has nothing to do with cx5, they are completely different vehicles and cx50 is only for the North American market. Why do you think something that'll be sold solely in the US and Canada will discontinue a different vehicle that's the best selling of the company worldwide? Also i own a cx50 turbo with premium plus package, and this vehicle is fantastic in every way. and no! the stitching on the seats will not go up your butt crack, it's also pretty quick and enjoyable to drive. Lane keep will work over 40mph, but it's not as strong, but it'll correct you and vibrate the steering wheel so you'll know you're departing your lane.
6 speed transmission ? Wow that’s ten years old. The rest looks great.
It feels better than a CVT
6 speed automatic is ridiculous.
@@ianmcculloch6839 If you say so
Stupid comment.
@@ianmcculloch6839 It's a lot more dependable than the crappy chain/belt CVT's. Newer tech isn't always better for the end user - and if you read up on this SkyActiv 6-AT you will find out that it has some cool updated design touches to it (which certain review mechanics have deemed "brilliant") that improve it a lot over the 6-AT of yesteryear.
To bad most dealers are jacking up the price over MSRP. Seems the norm anymore 😑
Hallo, schade dass er nicht für Deutschland bestimmt ist 🙁
So rear drive biased or front? I thought Mazda was heading towards rear drive architecture for better performance.
The smaller vehicle architecture (3, CX-30, CX-50) are FWD bias. The new large architecture for the CX 70 & 90 will be the RWD bias and inline 6, with optional PHEV.
All new Mazda SUVs come standard AWD
@@natlovell122 yes, but there is a difference if it rear wheel biased or front wheel biased (Land Crusier vs High Lander AWD systems). Rear wheel are sportier, and more durable. The engines are mounted longitudinally (north to south). That is why every higher tier brand of vehicle are usually rear biased. Probably cost more to make too. In Mazdas case, I believe the CX70 and 90 will be rear biased.
@@jackchn23 gotcha! Thanks!
I hate the plastic trim. I get it helps with rust but it makes it look cheap. I hope they remove it during the mide cycle model refresh.
That plastic has many locations that will trap sand and salt. To bad…
Thanks for a great review. I really enjoyed it. I just took delivery of a CX-30 (non turbo otherwise top of the line here in Canada) and I really like it for many of the same reasons you praised the CX-50. We are looking to replace our 2019 Tiguan with a hybrid. Do you have any sense of when a hybrid version of the CX-50 will become available? Thanks...Jim
Mazda recently confirmed that the CX-50 will get a Toyota hybrid powertrain in the next year or two.
The moonroof on this car sucks. Its panoramic but only opens about 4 inches. Headroom is terrible too. I'm 5'11 and there's not much room. Also the top of the line non turbo edition is missing some things that should be standard for a car of that price (heated rear seats, on board navigation, heated steering wheel) thats on the cx5. The HUD without onboard navigation is pretty pointless. Finally the infotainment is touch screen but to have arms long enough to reach it you'd never to be able to fit your head in the car.
Clear as mud
Yes I like it! It reminds me of my old Subaru Outback with the good old manual shift six speed tranny.
armrest is long ... ))) How many years it took Mazda for this )) . Well, now it remains to hope there is enough place on the second row...
Interesting, so far every review says that it is at the very least quieter than Rav-4
I’m not sure that’s saying much?
@@dondgc2298 That is saying A LOT - as a former owner of RAV-4 anything quieter is great
@@kiramiftari9486 that was my point. It doesn’t take much to be more quiet than a RAV4.
Nice leather seats which you can't get in the RAV4 either. Much nicer than that toyota softex.
Diesel versions had manny manny many problems here in Türkiye.
Good car..but a bit engine noise and road noise.. but..good car..
same roles noise than AS RAV-4 - which is universally accepted as a "really good car"... sooo
Should've been 3, 5, 7, and 9. 30 and 50 are confusing names.
I really dislike the cladding on this vehicle. I would get the CX-5.
Does it finally have tire pressure readings from the dash? If not, c'mon Mazda! It's 2022. Get with the program 😭😭
Lena - Yes, the CX-50 does have current tire pressure readings for the 4 independent tires within the center display (not on the dash but in the digital display in front of the driver). No need to trash Mazda; they did an excellent job with most of the useful modern tech (like 360 surround sensors and even rear/reverse auto braking when backing up plus of course standards like head up display shown in front of the driver, adaptive cruise control, Blind spot monitoring, etc.).
@@solitarysky734 it's incredible you think I'm "trashing Mazda" just because I mentioned facts that they didn't have tire pressure readings for each tire available on the dash. It's something myself and many, many others have talked about wanting in our modern Mazdas.
@@LenaCourtney - Today I did a more extensive check of your interest in the CX-50 related to tire pressure. First, it is important to note that Mazda now offers its "My Mazda" app which, at least with the CX-50, allows you to remotely view your tire pressure (all four tires are shown independently). In car this info is also shown on the dash display under the "Maintenence" tab. Hope this helps.
Yep. And on the app.
They lost me at cabin noise.
In my own opinion the Kudo design language never translated well onto the crossover and SUV lineup. With that being said with the discontinued 6 and the 3 with s murkier future no Thankyou.
Stubborn Mazda forgot to put the amazing torsion beam rear suspensions to the CX50 to keep road noise down. Oh, also it is like the older Oldsmobile that the headlight is always on like people drive with high beam on because they don't know how to work the car.
Decent ride...but Mazda is way behind in the EV / HEV game. Especially the way fuel prices are going. Going to have play catchup..
They dont have much of an R&D budget to really compete in that realm. Waiting until others do the initial investment and costs come down will benefit them as their annual volume likely isnt impacted much in the interim.
This SUV will get a hybrid version based on the Rav 4 hybrid. The new large architecture SUV's will get a hybrid and PHEV option, also based on Toyota platform.
Dommage que l'insonorisation ne soit pas bonne, surtout lorsqu'on effectue de longs trajets !
Who do you know who likes to be HONKED at and woken up?
Eliminate Auto Honk with Lock!!
Common Sense isn’t it?
How:
Press Lock and Unlock on Fob for 2-4 seconds
Honk should turn off.
Your dealer can assist if needed as some cars
might be slightly different. Thank you!
So Mazda kinda built a Subaru?
Mazda much better driving dynamics than Subaru. I own both.
Right, but without defective piston rings and blown head gaskets.
“Off road vehicle” with low profile tires on higher trims….Not smart
Hi Mark, please take this as a friendly observation but the long hair and facial hair is not a good look. Otherwise keep up the good work.
Ouch Ill take the rav4 prime with 5.3 0-60 and 40+ mpg.
🦅🦅🦅
Saw one in person at the dealership, it's not worth 41k. The car is wider version of cx5. 🤮🤮🤮
Which is why I am getting Preffered Plus - $33 .000 ;-)
I have a question how is it a 2023 when its only April 2022 who is the bright spark as it's ridiculous...
No hybrid option in 2023 lol joke
I'm still asking why but clearly I am not the target audience.
Good question.
This is an easy pass. Especially since it’s made here and it’s first year. Gotta love all the shit cladding
Mazda still making cars?! Wtf thought they were done.
Ignorance is bliss
Takahashi...one of the most biased "journalists" out there. What an awful review. Of course he is going to LOVE every Japanese vehicle...what a joke of a "review"
Oh stop it.
What happen to your hair ?
I recently grew my hair out and came straight to the comment section because I see how polarizing it is for people to accept men with long hair.
Sounds a lot of negatives.
Ugh
it's a crappy gas car
I drove an Hybrid RAV4 and it’s was so slow. I could care less about fuel (within reason) if I don’t have to worry about getting on the HWY and getting run over.
@@missjanelove I test drove a rav4 hybrid XSE today and it felt cheap & more road noise than my 2018 F-150.
I drove a RAV4 Prime and it was zippy and feature-rich, but felt cheap inside and was simultaneously fast, and boring to drive. Not sure how they accomplished making something so advanced simultaneously lackluster.
@@missjanelove I WAS CONSIDERING NEW HYBRID RAV AS A MAIN CONTENDER,. BUT THERE ARE A LOT OF COMPLAINS ABOUT IT... I WILL TAKE A GAS CAR OVER THAT FOR NOW
The RAV4 is nice if you like cars designed by Fisher Price.