I don't think you UNDERSTOOD WHY they made those moves for the Lord of the Rings movie Peter. It was so they were able to fool you into thinking that Gandalf and Frodo were so different in size. They did it with perspective and camera tricks instead of vfx and cgi work. Really impressive.
And totally different sets where they were recorded separately and then put together. What you call perspective and camera tricks is called practical effects. For example when Ian hits his head. He was on an other set. But to be honest, you are the one who doesn't understand. They did that table thing because it was cheaper and faster. Otherwise you can't record the whole thing as they did in that table part. Like 95% of the time when Ian was present with a hobbit in the movie, they were on different sets. Not acting together. Same with the dwarfs. LOTR's most of it was done with vfx. I was sad when read comments about that they used like 100 horseman for a scene and people thought it is amazing that they did it. I know they have no idea about anything. I know a movie where 6000 horseman were present for a scene. Imagine that. Also Gandhi? 150 or 200k extras were used during the funeral scene. If you wanna see a movie which was made 99.5% with practical effects and almost, ALMOST no vfx at all, go watch Interstellar. That is amazing.
There's always that commenter that assumes they know better. Clearly Peter knew WHY they were doing it, he'd just never seen the technique before. So, this is for you... r/woosh
2:00 - The payoff is it keeps their size differences proportionate to what their character should be. Froto looks like he is in front of Gandolf but is actually 2.5 feet to his right. It's genius because it's not only practical but was done entirely with math, lining up the shots, movement & item/subjects location(s). The payoff was totally worth it as it sets us up to believe their height for the entire series without question. :D
Poulet Rôti Uhm how about some sort of a rig with a dolly going down a slope, or maybe more realistically some sort of mechanical arm on a crane or some shit. I don’t know though, I’m even less of a filmmaker than our buddy Peter claims to be. I’m only pointing out this thing because I saw some behind the scenes stuff, and apparently the many cameras was a brand new technique, and took an insane amount of money and time to set up and shoot with.
Sylvester Poulsen back when the matrix was filmed you wouldn’t have a robot that could do that shot, it’s common knowledge how the shot was done in terms of using a lot of cameras, the fact the whole set for both the underground and the roof was CGI and green screened was not as common and is arguably more impressive because you can not tell the whole environment is fake.
"not worth the payoff" literally definition of good filmmaking. Shit that takes way too long to do and doesn't pop on screen is always the best. Doing it because doing it another way is lazy and not doing your best.
What are you talking about? Of course doing something the easy way is best. That way you can save budget for the rest of the movie, instead of blowing a big portion of it on something most people won't even notice. You do realize that most film making happens on a small budget, right? Finding an easy way to do something is a lot more impressive to me than finding a hard way to do it.
@@squidy7771 I think you missed the point he was trying to make. Take the matrix shot, they could have went the easy way and just shot it how it was done in the past. It would have been cheaper and would still have been OK for the film, but now those are iconic shots cause they didn't shoot this scene the easy way, but the hard way. If you compare the improvement with the time and money they had to spend it was a huge deal for quite a short shit but they still did it.
@@TBFSJjunior Yeah I understand. Of course it's fun to watch a spectacle, and even more fun to learn it was done in an original way. I just think that there's no reason to do something the hard way if it doesn't change anything. For example, practical effects vs CGI. Practical effects are generally harder to do, but they also look different. The reason to use practical effects isn't because it's hard, it's to get a different result. About the Matrix - that sequence is iconic because it was a brand new effect. They didn't have a different way of doing it.
@@squidy7771 "They haven't had a different way of doing it" Yes they had. That's why I meant you missed the point. FergVision wrote "Doing it because doing it an other way is lazy" And you understood that with "it" he means doing the effect the hard way, but I think he meant "doing the scene the hard way by including effects that aren't needed for the scene". They could have done the same scene from the matrix, telling the same story without that effect. Doing it without the effect, just the scene and story would have been much easier, but not iconic. They could have chosen to shoot the scene and tell the story the old way it would have been lazy and cheaper and safe, but they choose the hard way and did the scene differently with an effect noone has done before.
My favorite is the second last one that starts with the drummer slowly revealing the rest of the band and the dancers and those follow shots...that was awesome!!!
There's that child like joy...gives you a sense of how passionate these people are to be part of something that is essentially a lifestyle and way of thinking.
I have been watching your videos a few times and it is absolutley enjoyable to watch and see how these scenes come together and are made. My favorite one was the band and the guy walking into the kitchen. The movement was so fluid!! Like an ASMR video. Ahhh!!
I love how for the Superman and Flash scene, it was filmed in slow motion and they also acted in slow motion to make it SUPPPPEERRR slow. One of my favourite scenes of any movie is when Superman's eyes move to see the Flash coming up on him. SO GOOD
im not sure, im not familiar with movie making technology and the products around it, but i think with enough Wikipedia and google someone can figure it out, they could of used a program that we can buy or just download now a days that was state-of-the-art back then, much like the internet was a military tool used to connect bases around the world with information before any civilian made it accessible to the public
@@Flowmaster925 Used by the military but the Web was created by some civilians for use in connecting college library databases, then it just outgrew what it was created for.
created by the military as ARPAnet to connect more powerful computers together so they can time-share process that would take along time with just 1 computer. but it didnt work because computers had different operating systems. so years after some people came up with TCP/IP so they can connect with non-identical os's. there seems to be more conspiracy theories about how the internet started than there is factual info " the Internet began as an unanticipated result of an unsuccessful military and academic research program component, and was more a product of the US west coast culture of the 1980s than a product of the post-war Pentagon era." this is from a long article about it
I understand why people like it, I personally I'm a little sick and tired of them and really hope that this are added on top of his regular content that I do like. But I think they have taken over some of those content which sucks.
Yo Peter, series development idea: watch scenes like this and try to re-create them and as a finale comparing your take on them vs the actual take! Accept the challange? 👊
@@yeahyeahyeah5089 Definitely fair use. Using a small part of the product, and for a completely different purpose. Doesn't hurt the profits of the owners of the original piece--if anything, drives people to it who might not have seen it before.
Came to see reacts for this... I think the payoff is fantastic. Limits reliance on green screen, which you can spot, so makes it seem more real. (real lighting, etc) He might've meant it's just a small panning shot you could maybe eliminate not some grand action shot. But maybe that's also a testament to how effective these smaller shots come to be in selling the belief that the hobbits are already small.
They made a whole trilogy but this is not the first scene that comes to your mind if someone talks to you about the movies. You and most peple probably thinks about some war scenes, wich where made with alot of green screens.. He refered to that i think..
Well, he is a successful youtube photographer. He may have spent all his time on photography and youtube and never watched or learned anything to do with behind the scenes filmmaking. But I also don't peg him as an amazing photographer. He's damn good but he tends to have one style. What he does have is a personality and this is why he makes it the most on youtube, that and he makes helpful videos in a nice and approachable way.
Well, these are Hollywood level tricks, not that common and I think he's more into working within a smaller budget (aside from his expensive cameras). He's more of the camera guy but I guess he loves the idea of making bigger films (and has a few short films on his channel). Also what Tarik said. Edit: If you see his video/s where he talks about his earlier life he's been into shooting video/film since he was young (used to film everything) so I guess that's why he identifies as a filmmaker too.
"This guys is just pushing a piece of wood" Because he isn't clearly shaking the car. "What is this dude doing back here?" Making the light appear like it's appearing and disappearing at random. The whole "what's happening" that this "Filmmaker" couldn't figure out is, to the best of my knowledge, a car crash.
I think he would benefit from seing the clips beforehand. You see, many youtubers when they do reaction videos end up saing what seems like really stupid and obvious things. That comes from having to talk and process what is happening at the same time, he may actually know a lot about camera work, but because of trying to do two thinks at the same time, it just does not show, the same thing goes to most channels that react without a script, be it on games, videos, films, etc. (I think I may have repeated some points a few times, and I'm sorry if it seemed that way, it is a weird habit of mine)
Im a total beginner in photography and videography. But we have the same reaction on all those clips. Its like a child watching his favorite hero fighting villains. I love it
Peter, these are by far my favorite type of videos that you create. They really motivate and inspire me to work in the film industry when I get older. Keep it up!!!
@@trevorrogers95 Tru, those shots will withstand the test of time because they're practical. CGI always ages, there's just a decade long blind spot. Definitely check out the full BTS video of how they did it!
Have you ever seen Haunting of Hill House “Two Storms” episode with the 23 min continuous uncut scene?? You should def review that!! There’s a making of it on UA-cam it’s incredible!!! The entire 50 min episode was done in 4 takes
I loooove these!! Almost as much as I love opening credit sequence graphics. Prometheus has a great one, as does Snow White and the Huntsman. DREAM JOB!!
You totally missed the point with the "Matrix" clip^^. It was about the cameras positioned around them in a circle to record them in circular motion. :D You were just like "cables, DUH" xD
I am with you! I love all this behind the scenes stuff. Whenever I purchase a BluRay I watch the special features hoping for the behind the scenes and bloopers. If you like continuous shots you should check out the gathering from Outlander. It is so smooth. I can't find it on UA-cam sadly but it is pretty epic.
Dude. Your passion literally inspires me to wanna get into filmmaking. I think it’s really cool. Hopefully you find out the weird scene with the car that didn’t get explained. I’d be really interested in knowing too
2:40 woah woah, no. It's the opposite of full CGI. They spent extra time there showing you the complicated rig of adjacent cameras lined up to give you that iconic shot no one had ever done before.
The 2nd clip is from disk 3 or 4 of the fellowship of the ring 4 disc set. There are TONS of amazing things that they did to film then. I highly recommend you watch them if you haven't seen them already.
at 2:47, i had studied at university at animation course. whatever i am a filmmaker or not but this one is a really amazing video. this one takes a lot of pictures at once after one click in 360. this is done by photographic. i thought I'd share with you with that. Again apologise for my awful English as it is not my main language. English words are not in order. some words can be placed before or after finish the sentience. as i am sign user and deaf.
Those Matrix shots are so freakin dope cuz that was state of the art back then. They used all those cameras in sequence to record the action of the camera moving in a circle around them as they fight or Neo dodges those bullets. Its amazing that they came up with that technique to get the shots they wanted. Those movies still hold up today
@Peter McKinnon, you didn't mention some pretty incredible photography achievements for Matrix segment. They used an array of cameras around the subject to get that circular slow mo pan around Neo during the bullet scene and agent smith scene. This type of effect is actually called bullet time, there is not as much CGI as you think!
You should do a video where you try to recreate some of those clips. Also awesome video!!
Well that's a superb idea!
Love that idea!
Love the food shot, it’s class 👍
You should try and recreate the food shot 👍
Bright Tech HD that’s what I was kinda thinking also.
that scene was filmed on my workplace rooftop !!! too cool !!!!!!
Casual unnoticed comment
I don't think you UNDERSTOOD WHY they made those moves for the Lord of the Rings movie Peter. It was so they were able to fool you into thinking that Gandalf and Frodo were so different in size. They did it with perspective and camera tricks instead of vfx and cgi work. Really impressive.
And totally different sets where they were recorded separately and then put together.
What you call perspective and camera tricks is called practical effects.
For example when Ian hits his head. He was on an other set.
But to be honest, you are the one who doesn't understand. They did that table thing because it was cheaper and faster. Otherwise you can't record the whole thing as they did in that table part. Like 95% of the time when Ian was present with a hobbit in the movie, they were on different sets. Not acting together.
Same with the dwarfs. LOTR's most of it was done with vfx. I was sad when read comments about that they used like 100 horseman for a scene and people thought it is amazing that they did it. I know they have no idea about anything. I know a movie where 6000 horseman were present for a scene. Imagine that. Also Gandhi? 150 or 200k extras were used during the funeral scene.
If you wanna see a movie which was made 99.5% with practical effects and almost, ALMOST no vfx at all, go watch Interstellar. That is amazing.
@@moo8698 Good info. Thanks for clarifying.
@@moo8698 Nolan is the best
There's always that commenter that assumes they know better. Clearly Peter knew WHY they were doing it, he'd just never seen the technique before.
So, this is for you... r/woosh
yes dude, same point of view, i totaly agree with u
He didn’t realize that they had a different camera for each frame of the matrix shots. I think that was the point
My mind was blown the first time I realized that was how they filmed it.
OH SHIT I THOUGHT THOSE WERE FOR THE WIND
@@theambergryphon4266 nope all were cameras
Oh wow. I commented on this. Anyone interested can lookup bullet-time effect.
Yeah... He deserves a slap.
Slap.
2:00 - The payoff is it keeps their size differences proportionate to what their character should be. Froto looks like he is in front of Gandolf but is actually 2.5 feet to his right. It's genius because it's not only practical but was done entirely with math, lining up the shots, movement & item/subjects location(s). The payoff was totally worth it as it sets us up to believe their height for the entire series without question. :D
I disliked the video purely because he said something so stupid.
yes. optical illusion
JSHDVDUDHDJD
I can't handel this-
My life is a LIE-
SOMEBODY HAS TO FIND THE FINISHED CLIP
Yep
It's from a show on Netflix called Rim of the world. Comes out May 24th
prolly a police helicopter..
@@SandD3MON How the hell do you know that?
@@corynorell3686 Seen the trailer before this video and was like hey I recognize that car
You don't need notifications when you're always online on UA-cam 😂
This is true
Xyz Xyz hahah so true
Wasting life
Lmao true af bro😅🤘😂
Stop wasting life
Funny how he didn’t get that the wild part of the matrix clips, are the amount of cameras placed all around in a circle.
It's logic, how do you want a camera moving so fast in a circle
Poulet Rôti Uhm how about some sort of a rig with a dolly going down a slope, or maybe more realistically some sort of mechanical arm on a crane or some shit. I don’t know though, I’m even less of a filmmaker than our buddy Peter claims to be. I’m only pointing out this thing because I saw some behind the scenes stuff, and apparently the many cameras was a brand new technique, and took an insane amount of money and time to set up and shoot with.
Sylvester Poulsen back when the matrix was filmed you wouldn’t have a robot that could do that shot, it’s common knowledge how the shot was done in terms of using a lot of cameras, the fact the whole set for both the underground and the roof was CGI and green screened was not as common and is arguably more impressive because you can not tell the whole environment is fake.
Peter: "He's probably a great gimbal operator"
Jakob Owens aka The buffnerds: "U KIDDING ME BRO?!"
riccardo bergaglio LoL 💪🏻🎥 if he only knew
@@TheBuffNerds JAKOB ! HAVE MY BABIES!
"not worth the payoff" literally definition of good filmmaking. Shit that takes way too long to do and doesn't pop on screen is always the best. Doing it because doing it another way is lazy and not doing your best.
ikr!
What are you talking about? Of course doing something the easy way is best. That way you can save budget for the rest of the movie, instead of blowing a big portion of it on something most people won't even notice. You do realize that most film making happens on a small budget, right? Finding an easy way to do something is a lot more impressive to me than finding a hard way to do it.
@@squidy7771
I think you missed the point he was trying to make.
Take the matrix shot, they could have went the easy way and just shot it how it was done in the past. It would have been cheaper and would still have been OK for the film, but now those are iconic shots cause they didn't shoot this scene the easy way, but the hard way. If you compare the improvement with the time and money they had to spend it was a huge deal for quite a short shit but they still did it.
@@TBFSJjunior Yeah I understand. Of course it's fun to watch a spectacle, and even more fun to learn it was done in an original way. I just think that there's no reason to do something the hard way if it doesn't change anything. For example, practical effects vs CGI. Practical effects are generally harder to do, but they also look different. The reason to use practical effects isn't because it's hard, it's to get a different result. About the Matrix - that sequence is iconic because it was a brand new effect. They didn't have a different way of doing it.
@@squidy7771
"They haven't had a different way of doing it"
Yes they had. That's why I meant you missed the point.
FergVision wrote
"Doing it because doing it an other way is lazy"
And you understood that with "it" he means doing the effect the hard way, but I think he meant "doing the scene the hard way by including effects that aren't needed for the scene".
They could have done the same scene from the matrix, telling the same story without that effect.
Doing it without the effect, just the scene and story would have been much easier, but not iconic.
They could have chosen to shoot the scene and tell the story the old way it would have been lazy and cheaper and safe, but they choose the hard way and did the scene differently with an effect noone has done before.
Hahaha how’d you stumble upon my “Gimbal Training” meme? 💪🏻🎥🤣
Aaaaaaay, Jakob!!!
Wassup Jakob 👋🏻
That looks like a great training, sir!
You should make a parody video of this "great gimbal operator" comment and tag Peter in it! Poke some fun back at him.
The Buff Nerds channel one of our favorites! Thanks for all the great content you guys post!
My favorite is the second last one that starts with the drummer slowly revealing the rest of the band and the dancers and those follow shots...that was awesome!!!
Re: Switchboard shot: The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel is TRULY marvelous.
There's that child like joy...gives you a sense of how passionate these people are to be part of something that is essentially a lifestyle and way of thinking.
The car shot is gonna be in Netflix orignal "Rim of the World" (Release date 24 May).
Ehrenmann! Timestamp in the movie: 1:06:00
I love how passionate you are about film-making, it's really heartwarming seeing people get excited about things they enjoy!
The final two were from the Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
I loooooove one continuous shots. I love the amount of thought and hard work behind it
Love these Hollywood Effects. Just watch it and learn something new
These tricks are amazing right
I have been watching your videos a few times and it is absolutley enjoyable to watch and see how these scenes come together and are made. My favorite one was the band and the guy walking into the kitchen. The movement was so fluid!! Like an ASMR video. Ahhh!!
I love how for the Superman and Flash scene, it was filmed in slow motion and they also acted in slow motion to make it SUPPPPEERRR slow. One of my favourite scenes of any movie is when Superman's eyes move to see the Flash coming up on him. SO GOOD
Imagine the first Matrix was filmed in age of Windows 98.
the filmmakers weren't using windows 98, they were using programs that came to the public 10 years later
@@Flowmaster925 what program was it?
im not sure, im not familiar with movie making technology and the products around it, but i think with enough Wikipedia and google someone can figure it out, they could of used a program that we can buy or just download now a days that was state-of-the-art back then, much like the internet was a military tool used to connect bases around the world with information before any civilian made it accessible to the public
@@Flowmaster925 Used by the military but the Web was created by some civilians for use in connecting college library databases, then it just outgrew what it was created for.
created by the military as ARPAnet to connect more powerful computers together so they can time-share process that would take along time with just 1 computer. but it didnt work because computers had different operating systems. so years after some people came up with TCP/IP so they can connect with non-identical os's.
there seems to be more conspiracy theories about how the internet started than there is factual info
" the Internet began as an unanticipated result of an unsuccessful military and academic research program component, and was more a product of the US west coast culture of the 1980s than a product of the post-war Pentagon era." this is from a long article about it
So basically peter found out that reaction videos to filmmaking are getting a lot of views and he is grinding these reaction videos 🤘
yeah exactly
*throws views*
Actualy i like watching behind the scenes compilation. So... it's the same but with Peter's reactions and sometimes explications. All good for me.
I understand why people like it, I personally I'm a little sick and tired of them and really hope that this are added on top of his regular content that I do like. But I think they have taken over some of those content which sucks.
He has 3,500,000 subscribers. He knows what he's doing. :)
Yo Peter, series development idea: watch scenes like this and try to re-create them and as a finale comparing your take on them vs the actual take! Accept the challange? 👊
such a great idea!
Lol great idea.... If u want everyone to sue the crap out of u lol
yeah yeahyeah myth busters did it for years
@@yeahyeahyeah5089 Definitely fair use. Using a small part of the product, and for a completely different purpose. Doesn't hurt the profits of the owners of the original piece--if anything, drives people to it who might not have seen it before.
Like Cinecom!
Not the best payoff? They did it for the whole lotr trilogy. I think it actually paid off.
He's more impressed with green men trying to wrestle with the flash than he is with practical effects that have achieved perfection, apparently.
Came to see reacts for this... I think the payoff is fantastic. Limits reliance on green screen, which you can spot, so makes it seem more real. (real lighting, etc)
He might've meant it's just a small panning shot you could maybe eliminate not some grand action shot. But maybe that's also a testament to how effective these smaller shots come to be in selling the belief that the hobbits are already small.
Trevor Rogers This is the type of guy to shove in a shit ton of green screens and CGI into his film.
They made a whole trilogy but this is not the first scene that comes to your mind if someone talks to you about the movies. You and most peple probably thinks about some war scenes, wich where made with alot of green screens.. He refered to that i think..
these might be the best uploads on youtube
Peter really seems like he knows absolutely nothing about filmmaking
Well, he is a successful youtube photographer. He may have spent all his time on photography and youtube and never watched or learned anything to do with behind the scenes filmmaking. But I also don't peg him as an amazing photographer. He's damn good but he tends to have one style. What he does have is a personality and this is why he makes it the most on youtube, that and he makes helpful videos in a nice and approachable way.
Well, these are Hollywood level tricks, not that common and I think he's more into working within a smaller budget (aside from his expensive cameras). He's more of the camera guy but I guess he loves the idea of making bigger films (and has a few short films on his channel).
Also what Tarik said.
Edit: If you see his video/s where he talks about his earlier life he's been into shooting video/film since he was young (used to film everything) so I guess that's why he identifies as a filmmaker too.
"This guys is just pushing a piece of wood"
Because he isn't clearly shaking the car.
"What is this dude doing back here?"
Making the light appear like it's appearing and disappearing at random.
The whole "what's happening" that this "Filmmaker" couldn't figure out is, to the best of my knowledge, a car crash.
I think he would benefit from seing the clips beforehand. You see, many youtubers when they do reaction videos end up saing what seems like really stupid and obvious things. That comes from having to talk and process what is happening at the same time, he may actually know a lot about camera work, but because of trying to do two thinks at the same time, it just does not show, the same thing goes to most channels that react without a script, be it on games, videos, films, etc.
(I think I may have repeated some points a few times, and I'm sorry if it seemed that way, it is a weird habit of mine)
And....? You never stop learning.....
I like the continuous shot myself. Also, I liked the last video when they were changing the room too. Lots of planning.
The last clip is from amazon series marvelous mrs maisel season 2
Its actually amazon prime series marvelous mrs.maisle
It's not man, it's from The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel.
It's from Season 1
@@alanxie3550 it's the opening shot from the show’s second season :)
Enjoyed it
This is why I love film making... Literally all that just for a shot people will think was easy, insane.
One of my animation instructors designed the camera rig for those spinning Matrix scenes. The stuff he would do in class was insane.
Im a total beginner in photography and videography. But we have the same reaction on all those clips. Its like a child watching his favorite hero fighting villains. I love it
The last one was The Marvelous Ms. Maisel
So was the drummer, dancer, waiter scene
Peter, these are by far my favorite type of videos that you create. They really motivate and inspire me to work in the film industry when I get older. Keep it up!!!
I've watched that LOTR one at least 20 times, forced perspective is brilliant!
Well, according to pete, it didn't really "pay off."
Which, if you ask me, is nonsense.
@@trevorrogers95 Tru, those shots will withstand the test of time because they're practical. CGI always ages, there's just a decade long blind spot. Definitely check out the full BTS video of how they did it!
Those last two were from the Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, fantastic show. I’m always impressed with the cinematography.
I absolutely love this new “movie magic” segment! And I absolutely agree that you should totally do a peter McKinnon movie magic video! 😆🥳
The second to last one and the last one are from The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel and they have so many good shots like that and its SO GOOD!!
7:41
Dwight schrute: yes, CONTINUOUS SHOT!!!
lmfao
LOVE the continuous restaurant shot..!!!! Fluid..!
amazing.. we need 100 more of these please...
I like the ones that are one continuous shot, with everyone doing different things. It's almost like controlled chaos. It's really cool.
Have you ever seen Haunting of Hill House “Two Storms” episode with the 23 min continuous uncut scene?? You should def review that!! There’s a making of it on UA-cam it’s incredible!!! The entire 50 min episode was done in 4 takes
Have you ever seen cid episode 111 (in hindi) it was with a 111 minutes of continuous shot and it also won a world record back in 2004
I loooove these!! Almost as much as I love opening credit sequence graphics. Prometheus has a great one, as does Snow White and the Huntsman. DREAM JOB!!
I DARE YOU , to do a continuous shot involving Cards and Coffe, DOUBLE DARE YOU
Those oners are amazing how he takes the camera from the crane to the handheld and stays within the room to introduce the scenery 😮👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Hey Pete! you should find footage of how they did the continous fight sequence in Daredevil Season 1 ! :O That was awesome
The last shot was from the Amazon series The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, I saw that episode, it was seamless, excellent show.
Can't believe you don't know the Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
The last one was from The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel and I LOVE that show lol so cool!
my favourite was for sure the one with the food. The milk the fruit... Yeah it was super duper cool.
Love the enthusiasm brother. Reminds me of a kid watching toy adds haha
@@sidekick4 perish the thought! A young heart is a healthy heart ☺️
Literally nobody:
Comment bot on a photography post: SicK FraMes BRO. FIRE ! MONEY ! dOpE af :fire emoji:
This has become one of my favourite subjects here! Keep them coming!
The scene at 6:30 its the movie "The Last Place On Earth" its on Netflix
@Liam Baby dumbass i was talking about the new one that came out in 2019 or 2018 but it just got removed
If anyone was wondering, that scene with the switchboards and the gimbal/steadycam was from the Marvelous Mrs. Maisel from Amazon :D
That last one was the Marvelous Ms. Maisel on Netflix...great show if you haven't seen it.
THE LAST ONE WAS DOP THE MOVEMENT WOO
Would have been better if you were in a small screen in a corner while the shots were bigger, not the opposite.
I love this continuious shots too! Hands down the best one ever has to be from goodfellas when he walks into the restaurant
You totally missed the point with the "Matrix" clip^^.
It was about the cameras positioned around them in a circle to record them in circular motion. :D
You were just like "cables, DUH" xD
I too love the continuous Shot
I feel he talks to no one off camera. Like he has an assistant or something lol
Theres so many lost comments in here lol
The last one was Marvelous Mrs. Maisel which has many good shots and is just an overall great show.
8:53 “It’s like musical chairs in real life” 💀💀💀
I am with you! I love all this behind the scenes stuff. Whenever I purchase a BluRay I watch the special features hoping for the behind the scenes and bloopers. If you like continuous shots you should check out the gathering from Outlander. It is so smooth. I can't find it on UA-cam sadly but it is pretty epic.
I found out where that long shot of the in studio car is from! Its a 2019 movie from Shane Hurlbut!
I'm stoked to go watch this scene in the movie Rim of the World to see the payoff!
Dude. Your passion literally inspires me to wanna get into filmmaking. I think it’s really cool. Hopefully you find out the weird scene with the car that didn’t get explained. I’d be really interested in knowing too
wow, just refreshed youtube and saw this uploaded 10 seconds ago
2min here
Not even 5 seconds
2 min for me
Enjoy
Yes please do make them! Can't wait.
8:53 "Look at them spinning around Musical Chairs in real Life"
Me: Face Palm
Lmao
The switch board one was of the marvelous Mrs. Maisel
I don't even photograph or make videos yet I still watch every single one of your videos.
I can feel your passion for film making radiating thru my screen❤️
The Hobbit
The Flash scene
And
The Matrix
Are all Warner Bros films :) they’re amazing
CGI is good. Storytelling, not so much.
I LOVE THESE MOVIE BEHIND THE SCENES SNEAK PEEKS!!!! Keep ‘me coming!!!
Are you actually talking to someone in the background? Genuinely curious. Haha. Great video as always!
You can hear someone answering sometimes. (Like in the very end of this video)
Uh... yes, obviously.
uhhhh watch the end bah
I've seen the guy in one of his videos, he's not trippin
Oh. Cool. Sometimes he's got skits where he's also talking to himself acting as the camera guy. Haha. So I legit got confused.
I love these videos! I've always been interested in "Behind the Scenes" FX and tech. Keep them comin' Peter... Thanks!
2:40 woah woah, no. It's the opposite of full CGI. They spent extra time there showing you the complicated rig of adjacent cameras lined up to give you that iconic shot no one had ever done before.
The background is completely computer-generated. I think that's what he was referring to.
The last one is from the Amazon show the marvelous Mrs maisel. GREAT show by the way.
How about behind the scenes of your vlogging? And maybe regular behind the scenes of those crispy brolls!
The 2nd clip is from disk 3 or 4 of the fellowship of the ring 4 disc set. There are TONS of amazing things that they did to film then. I highly recommend you watch them if you haven't seen them already.
If you love long lasting shots you should definitely watch the movie "Victoria" by Sebastian Schipper! The whole movie (140min) is a ONE SHOT!!
As well as 119min Birdman, although there are some splicing tricks.
that last scene with the girl pluging in swiches is from
The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel on Amazon Prime. can't wait for seadon 3. :)
Will you make a vlog again? :(
Anyway... Nice video👍
The Marvelous Mrs Maisel loves those one-take shots
The Matrix: “It’s full CG”
You literally just watched them show you it’s not CG
I think he meant the background.
at 2:47, i had studied at university at animation course. whatever i am a filmmaker or not but this one is a really amazing video. this one takes a lot of pictures at once after one click in 360. this is done by photographic. i thought I'd share with you with that. Again apologise for my awful English as it is not my main language. English words are not in order. some words can be placed before or after finish the sentience. as i am sign user and deaf.
Sometimes I feel like whenever he looks behind the camera like there’s A dude behind it there really isn’t LOL
If you watch till the end you'd notice he's talking to him.
Those Matrix shots are so freakin dope cuz that was state of the art back then. They used all those cameras in sequence to record the action of the camera moving in a circle around them as they fight or Neo dodges those bullets. Its amazing that they came up with that technique to get the shots they wanted. Those movies still hold up today
Your reaction, is my reaction to your videos 🤷♂️
Yeees
@Peter McKinnon, you didn't mention some pretty incredible photography achievements for Matrix segment. They used an array of cameras around the subject to get that circular slow mo pan around Neo during the bullet scene and agent smith scene. This type of effect is actually called bullet time, there is not as much CGI as you think!
Could you make the clips a little bigger on the next one?
Liked! Yes, Peter...take some of these concepts and make your own video. Then a PMHollyWoodCamera Challenge. Hah!! This could be a whole segment.... 😉
You should watch the scenes from Children of Men I swear one of them went on for about 5mins one shot
Seeing you excited about filmmaking makes me, an actor, excited about filmmaking
Peter : Id Love to make one of those Food Photographies...So cool
Next Video: Filmmaker reacts to Crazy Hollywood Tricks
Hahaha 😂😂😂💪
this is so cool! do more of this Peter! Loved it
Hey! That's Jakob Owens from TheBuffNerds
those cameras!!!!!!!!! those mounts!!!!