Strange. Because you can't really die from a lack of sex, but a lack of sleep and nutrition. *"If you're not interested in sex and that doesn't bother you"* Not everyone that isn't interested in sex can't be given such. It all comes down to why they aren't interested. In this case, you would be someone that either doesn't care about it or tries to avoid it like you would with foods you don't like. *"is not being able to get laid, then claiming you didnt want it any way, after the fact."* 1. Pot, Kettle, Black 2. You wouldn't willingly be able to get laid, if you don't even have sexual desires to begin with. Inceldom and asexuality don't go together Hence is why you would never see a gay man willingly do it with a woman, or a straight woman with another woman (i'm not gay myself but I do know people IRL who are. And no, like being straight and bi, those are things you are born as, not what you can simply "choose" to be)
just today i read a spanish article that talked about sexuality (i usually read them to try to understand these desires, but i always end up with more questions), and the respondents considered sex as important as eating. for them it was a basic need and one of the respondents even said she couldn't live without sex. Sorry for any spelling mistakes, English is not my first language.
Its weird I know. To think people leave others because of lack of sex is not something I can relate to (Im certainly not trying to judge) and another thing is I feel even at times in the minority when going on Asexual forms because so many can still find sex pleasure in sex while I cannot. Sex is not this pleasureble thing to me that so many talk about, its just not. Whats annoying is the ones who say "you haven't had good sex yet". Good sex is different opinions in my opinion. ALL sex is the same for me so "good sex" for me dont exist because Im THAT averse/somewhat repulsed. I am a person that is not capable of enjoying sex with anyone because I lack sexual desire, arousal, and attraction with other people. I could not fathom myself leaving a person because we are not having sex but im only speaking for myself. It would even make me feel bad if a person was worried I wouldn't give them a time of day because they dont want sex.
Well, dating is harder and like another comment said its society. I only want to date other asexual folk, no offense to allos they are great friends. The problem is we need a asexual dating scene.
@@Sal3600 Some self-reflection on your part will make you realize people like you are in fact "the gutter". Staying ignorant about these topics is a choice.
I remember reading SA in the 70's and for decades thereafter when the magazine actually was worth reading. There were real science articles. It was brilliant. It has devolved to being a woke conduit with little science. What crap this is.
Scientific American used to be a highlight of each month. Latter I would use Scientific American articles in my classes. Recently it has become an ideology looking for a justification to exist. Lysenko would love it. Scientific American belongs in the dumpster next to other tabloids.😊
What studies show that asexuality is a normal mode of attraction? By what standard did they determine this? What tests did they use to determine this? Or is it just trendy to say that whatever the alphabet community attaches to their list is real? If so, why not add SGS as a new gender -- "Skeptical of Gender Studies".
What studies show that pain is an normal response to intense stimuli? By what standard did they determine this? What tests did they use to determine this? Or is it just trendy to give morphine to people with broken bones? If so, why not add SoPS as a new gender - “Skeptical of Pain Sensations?” - Person with Congenital Insensitivity to Pain and Anhydrosis
What is it that you don't understand? You're sexually attracted to women but not men. Some people are sexually attracted to men but not women. Some are sexually attracted to both genders. But you draw the line at someone that doesn't feel sexual attraction towards both genders? It's just like how you are not gay, but on top of that they're not straight either. What is wrong with that? I thought it was all the gay butt stuff that made you guys uncomfortable lol
Wait a minute, is having intercourse really considered as important as eating and sleeping? Is it really THAT important to people? 😱
Strange. Because you can't really die from a lack of sex, but a lack of sleep and nutrition.
*"If you're not interested in sex and that doesn't bother you"*
Not everyone that isn't interested in sex can't be given such. It all comes down to why they aren't interested.
In this case, you would be someone that either doesn't care about it or tries to avoid it like you would with foods you don't like.
*"is not being able to get laid, then claiming you didnt want it any way, after the fact."*
1. Pot, Kettle, Black
2. You wouldn't willingly be able to get laid, if you don't even have sexual desires to begin with. Inceldom and asexuality don't go together
Hence is why you would never see a gay man willingly do it with a woman, or a straight woman with another woman (i'm not gay myself but I do know people IRL who are. And no, like being straight and bi, those are things you are born as, not what you can simply "choose" to be)
just today i read a spanish article that talked about sexuality
(i usually read them to try to understand these desires, but i always end up with more questions), and the respondents considered sex as important as eating. for them it was a basic need and one of the respondents even said she couldn't live without sex.
Sorry for any spelling mistakes, English is not my first language.
Its weird I know. To think people leave others because of lack of sex is not something I can relate to (Im certainly not trying to judge) and another thing is I feel even at times in the minority when going on Asexual forms because so many can still find sex pleasure in sex while I cannot. Sex is not this pleasureble thing to me that so many talk about, its just not. Whats annoying is the ones who say "you haven't had good sex yet". Good sex is different opinions in my opinion. ALL sex is the same for me so "good sex" for me dont exist because Im THAT averse/somewhat repulsed. I am a person that is not capable of enjoying sex with anyone because I lack sexual desire, arousal, and attraction with other people. I could not fathom myself leaving a person because we are not having sex but im only speaking for myself. It would even make me feel bad if a person was worried I wouldn't give them a time of day because they dont want sex.
Thank you for the representation. Too many people misunderstand us.
Lmao
"The exception that proves the rule"
Thank you, we need to respect people’s preferences as long as they don’t impinge on others. Great presentation.
If you're not interested in sex and that doesn't bother you, then I doesn't bother me either.
So what's the problem?
society
Well, dating is harder and like another comment said its society. I only want to date other asexual folk, no offense to allos they are great friends. The problem is we need a asexual dating scene.
Thank you! 🖤🩶🤍💜
A lot of ignorant people in the comments who are eager to show off their ignorance. How surprising!
Well, it is youtube. Not sure what you expected.
@@blt4life112 That's exactly what was to be expected. That's why I used the "How surprising!" ironically.
Thank you for making this.
Good.
A man is just a woman with facial hair.
What do you mean?
What. The. Hell.
This is a video explaining asexual people. Why are you confused?
Trust the expert Luke.. trust the expert. 😅
Down the gutter this channel goes
@@Sal3600 Some self-reflection on your part will make you realize people like you are in fact "the gutter". Staying ignorant about these topics is a choice.
Scientific American... With emphasis on keyword "American".
Yes- because only asexuals exist in america!
You're easy to trigger.
@@blt4life112 and yet here you are commenting 😅
I remember reading SA in the 70's and for decades thereafter when the magazine actually was worth reading. There were real science articles. It was brilliant. It has devolved to being a woke conduit with little science. What crap this is.
Scientific American used to be a highlight of each month. Latter I would use Scientific American articles in my classes. Recently it has become an ideology looking for a justification to exist. Lysenko would love it. Scientific American belongs in the dumpster next to other tabloids.😊
What studies show that asexuality is a normal mode of attraction? By what standard did they determine this? What tests did they use to determine this? Or is it just trendy to say that whatever the alphabet community attaches to their list is real? If so, why not add SGS as a new gender -- "Skeptical of Gender Studies".
What studies show that pain is an normal response to intense stimuli? By what standard did they determine this? What tests did they use to determine this? Or is it just trendy to give morphine to people with broken bones? If so, why not add SoPS as a new gender - “Skeptical of Pain Sensations?”
- Person with Congenital Insensitivity to Pain and Anhydrosis
@@Hilliam66 best
@@Hilliam66Great response
You've been cancelled. Bye.
That's not what that means. 🙄 Bye Felicia!
Later hater
ee
Wtf is this?
Your mom
This makes zero sense. This is wrong.
What is it that you don't understand? You're sexually attracted to women but not men. Some people are sexually attracted to men but not women. Some are sexually attracted to both genders. But you draw the line at someone that doesn't feel sexual attraction towards both genders? It's just like how you are not gay, but on top of that they're not straight either. What is wrong with that? I thought it was all the gay butt stuff that made you guys uncomfortable lol
Why is this wrong? Please dont be a bitch.
How are moving images appearing under that glass? omg WITCHCRAFT! 🔥
*barf*
Barf? Do you find people who aren't interested in sex gross? That's a fucking weird view to have dude.
Why? Because ur not a fan of science
That’s what you are.