Roof of woman's home removed by mistake, company offers a 'deal' to fix it

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 вер 2018
  • The house that was supposed to have their roof removed was three doors down from the family's home. Pat Foran reports.
    Subscribe to CTV News to watch more videos: / ctvnews
    Connect with CTV News:
    For the latest news visit: www.ctvnews.ca/
    For a full video offering visit the CTV News Network: www.ctvnews.ca/video
    CTV News on Facebook: / ctvnews
    CTV News on Twitter: / ctvnews
    Watch CTV News on Twitter: / watchctvnews
    CTV News on Google+: plus.google.com/+CTVNews/posts
    CTV News on Instagram: / ctvnews
    CTV News on Pinterest: / ctvnews
    ---
    CTV News is Canada's most-watched news organization both locally and nationally, and has a network of national, international, and local news operations.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6 тис.

  • @viking956
    @viking956 3 роки тому +13034

    Insurance shouldn't even be a conversation here. They stole her roof. They need to pay to replace it. Period.

    • @0pLegit
      @0pLegit 3 роки тому +215

      Did you not hear the end? They said they would install a new one free but she didn’t want them to do it

    • @mrtree1368
      @mrtree1368 3 роки тому +963

      @@0pLegit she has that right after a mistake like that I wouldn't have them do anything either. They'll pay for who I choose to do it

    • @nettejohnson7492
      @nettejohnson7492 3 роки тому +58

      They offered to but the homeowner wanted another company to do the job.

    • @TripleAstyle1
      @TripleAstyle1 3 роки тому +423

      @@nettejohnson7492 thats the homeowners choice..... how about someone comes over and pulls the motor out of your car, then says oops, heck we will put a different motor in for ya! .........

    • @billpiehler9010
      @billpiehler9010 3 роки тому +513

      If the roofing company that screwed up did it for free they would do substandard work

  • @jeffprice4860
    @jeffprice4860 4 роки тому +14484

    Who starts a job without speaking to the homeowner ?

    • @morishidol4209
      @morishidol4209 4 роки тому +451

      Exactly?

    • @ResearchNational
      @ResearchNational 4 роки тому +621

      Most home owners aren't home when we re-roof a house, they are already at work.

    • @jijumonm2345
      @jijumonm2345 4 роки тому +614

      @@ResearchNational that's understandable, but why not give a call. Just a little heads up "Hey, so we're starting the roofing work at your house".

    • @serenitydabarbarian404
      @serenitydabarbarian404 4 роки тому +345

      @@jijumonm2345 They probably did, but if they weren't home was like "Cool, thanks for letting me know. I get off work at 3 so I'll see you at 4." End of convo. I'm in the sign industry, but if we put up a sign when owners aren't there/they have no security our installers send a pic to a project manager for verification. While a sign is not a roof, doing any job twice costs business not to mention the distrust noq inside your client.

    • @Scratchingforcash
      @Scratchingforcash 4 роки тому +6

      Lol

  • @IronBalls
    @IronBalls 3 роки тому +2122

    It’s not doing her roof “for free”, it’s fixing your own mistake

    • @rainman632
      @rainman632 3 роки тому +4

      Fixing their mistake for free.. other wise should would have had to pay to fix the mistake which is not free

    • @peterrivney552
      @peterrivney552 2 роки тому +15

      That free repair found be a cut corners job missing underlays etc. Just to patch it up no roofer wants to loose money shingles are not cheep at. $ 28. a bundle probably $5ooo for shingles never mind underlays nails etc...

    • @42luke93
      @42luke93 11 місяців тому

      If anything let her just pay for the material to make it reasonable.

    • @macbook802
      @macbook802 10 місяців тому +1

      They wanted to fix it, her nasty grinch as made it more complicated than it had to be

    • @supersaiyaman11589
      @supersaiyaman11589 10 місяців тому +12

      @@42luke93 no the home owner should not have to pay anything as it was not her fault at all.

  • @mikeg3439
    @mikeg3439 11 місяців тому +198

    In 30 years, we (company I worked for and eventually co-owned, still do) did this once. The roof we removed was small-ish, and very old actually, arguably needed to be replaced. But still, this was our ERROR. We immediately explained the mistake to the owner, and said we would put a higher quality roof on immediately (higher quality than the original material that was installed on theirs). We gave them a scope of work in writing, and noted it would all of course be at zero cost. We also told them that we would remove and replace the dryrot exposed from tearing off, and that we would pay for a permit and have it inspected both the deck, and then the final inspection, and that we would walk them through this and handle it all ourselves. Point being we admitted culpability and we did this immediately. The owner agreed, we pushed this through immediately for them. That's what you have to do. Not offer a f___ing "deal" to the person. You eat it that week, you don't get paid, as owners, that week. Maybe don't eff up again (the person responsible was one of the three partners).

    • @Towelie4200
      @Towelie4200 9 місяців тому +5

      And a tax write off I hope

    • @MojoPup
      @MojoPup 9 місяців тому +33

      And you're the type of company that has return customers for that reason. If I was their neighbor and heard what you did, I would be calling you for my roof. Anyone can make a mistake, it's how you act afterword that's important.

  • @AllenHanPR
    @AllenHanPR 4 роки тому +8527

    Hey I broke your car window by accident, I can sell you a new window at discount.

    • @hughjaanus6680
      @hughjaanus6680 4 роки тому +162

      You are at the wrong video, this is about a roof.

    • @elvergudo7477
      @elvergudo7477 4 роки тому +40

      Free roof buddy

    • @moriallen643
      @moriallen643 3 роки тому +234

      Y'all really dont get sarcasm do ya.... wowz

    • @chrishightower4308
      @chrishightower4308 3 роки тому +24

      @@moriallen643 nah they do, its just that the ones responsible for the accident stated they would do it for free, no continuity in the comment

    • @esmegrant8442
      @esmegrant8442 3 роки тому +5

      D It’s a joke buddy

  • @ZeldagigafanMatthew
    @ZeldagigafanMatthew 3 роки тому +4012

    "We won't replace it free, but we'll give you a killer deal!"
    That company should be dissolved immediately.

    • @jensen_2261
      @jensen_2261 3 роки тому +48

      Except they did offer to pay for the entire thing. And when she refused, they then offered to pay the insurance deductible.
      This news ad is just clickbait

    • @ShinyMajor
      @ShinyMajor 3 роки тому +215

      @@jensen_2261 They told the news station they'd do it for free. Sounds like someone decided bad press was more expensive

    • @janmane
      @janmane 3 роки тому +6

      @@AnnA-jd4xm exactly!

    • @777Skeptic
      @777Skeptic 3 роки тому +57

      You can only be considered moral if you do the right thing when no one's watching.
      It wasn't until cameras showed up they did the right thing.

    • @John-bu7qs
      @John-bu7qs 3 роки тому +72

      @@jensen_2261 No they offered to replace it not pay for another company to do it. If you think that allowing a company that cant be bothered to even verify the address they are at is responsible enough to do a quality job replace the roof, there is no help for you.

  • @kennjt5015
    @kennjt5015 3 роки тому +223

    They almost scammed her. "Hey, we made a mistake and removed your roof. But don't worry! We got a sweet deal for you! 50% less for a new roof!"

    • @fifacraft49
      @fifacraft49 3 роки тому +2

      But two roofs get one free!

    • @FedUpPrincess09
      @FedUpPrincess09 3 роки тому +3

      And the 50% she gets off is for the unrequested work they already did...the 50% she would be charged would be for them to finish it lol they already had half the work done for free...no way in hell would I pay them to fix something they screwed up lol u break it u buy it...their mistake is theirs alone...not her problem...he needs to fix what he broke or pay for what he broke...or...she can go thru her insurance to have it fixed and sue the company or she can pay another company out if pocket and then sue the original company...either way he needs to be held accountable

    • @peterrivney552
      @peterrivney552 2 роки тому

      With 50% of the work being done...

    • @fallenzen
      @fallenzen 2 роки тому +3

      "We'll be happy to pay your deductible and have YOUR insurance foot this bill."

  • @EliosMoonElios
    @EliosMoonElios 3 роки тому +320

    It was a honest mistake until they refuse to re-roofing it free.

    • @arianebolt1575
      @arianebolt1575 2 роки тому +8

      Eh. Somewhere on their checklist needs to be "make sure you have the right house".

    • @boooster101
      @boooster101 2 роки тому +11

      Amazing how they only offered a new roof / covering the deductible after it became public.
      Clearly shows that it was a PR reason to offer it, not a managment decision

    • @kevindalby520
      @kevindalby520 9 місяців тому +1

      I had to stop a lawn service from cutting my lawn instead of the neighbors next door lawn. They had the wrong address on their work order.

    • @MatthewMS.
      @MatthewMS. 9 місяців тому

      It’s strange how such a mistake could happen.

  • @soulesslemming
    @soulesslemming 3 роки тому +2756

    That “deal” should be 100% off plus damages.

    • @zbruh7268
      @zbruh7268 3 роки тому +21

      They did offer that. Also offered to pay for insurance deductible so another company could do it.

    • @thaik56
      @thaik56 3 роки тому +157

      @@zbruh7268 yeah after being exposed on television lol

    • @zbruh7268
      @zbruh7268 3 роки тому +12

      @@thaik56 that was before it was aired on the news. Im not defending them, but they did try remediate

    • @moochoopr9551
      @moochoopr9551 3 роки тому +41

      @@zbruh7268 No, you shouldn't file for insurance claim for this kind of stuff. The insurance rate will go up afterward.
      Ask the company to pay full price for the job.

    • @joesmith701
      @joesmith701 3 роки тому +6

      @@zbruh7268 where does it state they offered it prior to going to the news? Also the fact is they should have payed whoever the homeowner wanted to do it as it was the companies mistake that ruined the roof.

  • @MichaelJayValueInvesting
    @MichaelJayValueInvesting 5 років тому +12060

    This is legally vandalism and she can sue for property damages.

    • @ramencup_
      @ramencup_ 5 років тому +327

      Benjamin Burkhardt No, she shouldn’t. The company literally said it was a mistake and they’ll give her the money for her to get a new roof.

    • @bobnob3496
      @bobnob3496 5 років тому +1105

      Accidentally breaking the law doesn't clear you of charges.

    • @theresahall6197
      @theresahall6197 5 років тому +44

      @@bobnob3496 only if you do in the bank name.

    • @mohammedbatayneh7028
      @mohammedbatayneh7028 5 років тому +40

      You have to prove intent, no prosecutor would charge this.

    • @BoopSnoot
      @BoopSnoot 5 років тому +45

      No, but intent matters. Vandalism is about intent to cause harm. This was an accident, and they would be covered by insurance for this, the same as if they accidentally damaged a roof or hurt someone on the job. She would be dealing with their insurance and her own home owners insurance, and in fact its unlikely its even her home, and is probably the bank's home.

  • @7chanconn7
    @7chanconn7 3 роки тому +194

    It doesn’t matter if it’s an “honest mistake” If I removed someone’s roof I would be breaking at least three laws. What they did was illegal and the fact they only offered her a deal is freaking crazy

    • @kristopherrainbolt2617
      @kristopherrainbolt2617 Рік тому +4

      As an operator of a service company, I can assure you, it was an honest mistake. The best roofing companies out there do it; and lol it's not illegal (as in criminal). What they are arguing is they are fighting to get a new roof. Your adding more than necessary by saying what they did was "illegal."

    • @DoggosintheHouse
      @DoggosintheHouse 11 місяців тому +28

      @@kristopherrainbolt2617 I'd call trespassing, willful destruction of property and vandalism illegal. I wouldn't be filing an insurance claim and having my rates go up. I'd be suing the vendor and pressing charges for criminal trespass.

    • @user-st1hy6ql3j
      @user-st1hy6ql3j 9 місяців тому +4

      it's actually felony theft, but if you call the police they'll say it's a civil matter.

    • @user-st1hy6ql3j
      @user-st1hy6ql3j 9 місяців тому +1

      @@kristopherrainbolt2617 so you can go on someone's property and steal their roof and it's not illegal? You voted for trump didn't you? Truth isn't truth, theft isn't theft and a Cheeto isn't trump.

    • @ShaggyRogers1
      @ShaggyRogers1 9 місяців тому +6

      @@kristopherrainbolt2617 Doing thousands of dollars in damage and trying to duck liability is the definition of criminal.

  • @MrBerserkinTime
    @MrBerserkinTime 2 роки тому +79

    its like stealing someones tires and then giving them a a discount on tires instead of giving them their tires back

    • @KayJay940
      @KayJay940 2 роки тому

      Its aint that cut n dry. If I break your used item I owe you the cost of a used item NOT a new one. You dont get a windfall because of someones mistake.
      In either case the appropriate response would be to follow the owner of the roofing company home and start removing his roof then claim ignorance.

    • @talker51292
      @talker51292 2 роки тому +4

      @@KayJay940 nope. They didn’t consent to having their roof removed and it’s gone. They pay the price in full.

    • @spongmongler6760
      @spongmongler6760 2 роки тому +3

      @@KayJay940 you broke my item that was perfectly fine, it's not your decision to re-break my item, you owe me a new one, you scumbag

    • @KayJay940
      @KayJay940 2 роки тому

      @@spongmongler6760 not how it works at all.
      You dont get a new car when someone hits your 20yr old jalopy. The exact same rules apply to every piece of property.
      Get an education you slow poke.

    • @spongmongler6760
      @spongmongler6760 2 роки тому +2

      @@KayJay940 don't break things that aren't yours and then complain that you have consequences, you scumbag. it's not your choice to pay what you owe

  • @goat9295
    @goat9295 3 роки тому +5558

    Why doesn't she take them to court? This is an easy case.

    • @jakemartinez6894
      @jakemartinez6894 3 роки тому +55

      GOAT
      You’re joking... right

    • @khl2445
      @khl2445 3 роки тому +175

      @@jakemartinez6894 why tho

    • @soul8097
      @soul8097 3 роки тому +106

      Mauri QHD - TNTL it takes money for that which probably would towards the lawyers more than them

    • @someguy6075
      @someguy6075 3 роки тому +314

      Her insurance will most likely go after the company. Best to let them handle it since they are more equipped, and she was already offered the deductible.

    • @nemo227
      @nemo227 3 роки тому +73

      @@someguy6075 It shouldn't be her insurance but the roofing company insurance and it should be done very quickly. When I had my own business I (like most businesses like mine) had an "Errors and Omissions" policy. The description for the video shows several CTVNews links but they should post a follow-up with this video and should not require the viewer to follow a bunch of links which may or may not have an actual follow-up. But that seems to be the way news organizations too often operate.

  • @kylegoyak
    @kylegoyak 3 роки тому +3078

    Just the fact that they offered a "deal" instead of offering to replace it for free is mind boggling.

    • @uniqsolsession
      @uniqsolsession 3 роки тому +73

      That’s what is baffling me. Definitely not 5 Stars worthy

    • @stanmamamooandblackpinkcow4414
      @stanmamamooandblackpinkcow4414 3 роки тому +51

      ...and they called themselves "five star roofing" lol

    • @superioremerald4352
      @superioremerald4352 3 роки тому +63

      im sorry but didnt they say they would replace it for free, and she still declined

    • @Mitch...Gregory
      @Mitch...Gregory 3 роки тому +31

      @@superioremerald4352 yep, they then payed the company the woman decided to go with. She never payed a dime.

    • @saul-goodman
      @saul-goodman 3 роки тому +121

      @@superioremerald4352 They only offered to replace it after finding out it would be publicized. If the news isn't involved, she doesn't get a free roof

  • @alonzo5.040
    @alonzo5.040 3 роки тому +92

    Roof company: best we can do is 5% off and a apology
    News calls them*
    Roof company: “we’ll do it free”
    Petty 😂

  • @katiem4539
    @katiem4539 3 роки тому +39

    They stole the roof. I’m shocked they actually aren’t being prosecuted. How do you accidentally work on a house without confirming?

  • @leonaleona1628
    @leonaleona1628 5 років тому +7987

    Update: They're now called One Star Roofing.

    • @slav7221
      @slav7221 5 років тому +124

      Leona Leona now this is the comment I was scrolling for well done 👌

    • @Beezlie727
      @Beezlie727 5 років тому +65

      You're terrible for that comment! I'm terrible for laughing at it!😁

    • @georgemouanetry8158
      @georgemouanetry8158 5 років тому +7

      Leona Leona 😂

    • @drkphinx
      @drkphinx 5 років тому +6

      😂😂😂

    • @darthsailormoon4831
      @darthsailormoon4831 5 років тому +7

      The lady could be sued for scandal if there is evidence that they did the negotiation of a new roof before she went to the news.

  • @ringoflynt
    @ringoflynt 4 роки тому +5140

    She shouldn’t be talking to anyone at the roofing company, her LAWYER should be doing all the talking. Be sure to place the lawyer fees as part of the settlement also

    • @cbot375
      @cbot375 4 роки тому +133

      Yes, plus the roofing company should have insurance for these types of things. If her home gets damage further then the roofing company might go bankrupt by buying her an entire new home. Id go as far as to suing the roofers children too.

    • @zooofsocks1924
      @zooofsocks1924 4 роки тому +20

      C-ren tf is wrong with you?

    • @DJxSGGxNeo
      @DJxSGGxNeo 3 роки тому +16

      Lawyers mostly add in fees to this, yea it's common sense that this is criminal though. She did call the police, mostly you have a hard time getting them to file a report so there is record.

    • @Milesco
      @Milesco 3 роки тому +26

      Unfortunately, lawyer's fees generally are not considered a part of a litigant's damages, so even if you win your case, you still have to pay your lawyer. That sucks, and it should be changed. Some other countries, most notably the UK, have a different rule, where the loser has to pay the winner's attorney's fees. That's the way it should be here.
      (There are narrow exceptions for certain types of cases, most commonly Lemon Law and civil rights cases. But that's the exception, not the rule.)

    • @user-cy6gf2pj7y
      @user-cy6gf2pj7y 3 роки тому +13

      If she called her insurance company, the insurance company's lawyers would, sure as hell, sue the roofing company. Then, the check the roofers paid for the deductible would be used in court as evidence of their guilt. Slam dunk case, and the roofers and their contractor's insurance would be stuck paying her insurance company.

  • @cocoanutpomeranian7987
    @cocoanutpomeranian7987 9 місяців тому +5

    This exact thing happened to my neighbor across the street from me in California in the 80’s. Roofers tore off her roof but should have been at the house next door. They replaced her roof with a new one immediately and at no charge.

  • @ChrisStaff989
    @ChrisStaff989 2 роки тому +12

    Imagine having the audacity to offer a deal to fix something like this

  • @studymassage8204
    @studymassage8204 3 роки тому +3742

    The mistake was not letting them finish, THEN tell them it's the wrong house... Free roof that way.

    • @revvvrand
      @revvvrand 3 роки тому +64

      I love it!!!

    • @Ante_Knezevic
      @Ante_Knezevic 3 роки тому +38

      She already got a free roof what are you talking about

    • @MrHeat1up
      @MrHeat1up 3 роки тому +240

      @@Ante_Knezevic she has a insurance claim against her home owners insurance policy. It was not free.

    • @Ante_Knezevic
      @Ante_Knezevic 3 роки тому +11

      @@MrHeat1up What are you talking about they made it for free, no insurance was involved here

    • @jennifermontgrain6208
      @jennifermontgrain6208 3 роки тому +2

      Yes!!!!!!!!

  • @ColonelPeppers
    @ColonelPeppers 3 роки тому +2838

    The moment the news channel got involved Five Star Roofing was all about making this problem go away. Forget insurance just call your local news team, they will take care of you.

    • @MrKiwiz
      @MrKiwiz 3 роки тому +106

      For real though, can't let something like that get on Twitter or Facebook or your whole ass company would go down in hours.

    • @anniehovsepian6173
      @anniehovsepian6173 3 роки тому +19

      They don't want the negative publicity.

    • @blitzwarzone342
      @blitzwarzone342 3 роки тому +34

      Before the news got involved they were ready to offer a deal and take her money for their mistake

    • @kumottakun6089
      @kumottakun6089 3 роки тому +6

      Specially in this cancel culture times 😂

    • @yurrrr7495
      @yurrrr7495 3 роки тому +1

      @@kumottakun6089 fax yo 😂😂😂😂

  • @debbieb.8708
    @debbieb.8708 2 роки тому +18

    They took the roof off without her permission. Wrong address. Five Star Roofing should have had to pay every dime to the other company to get her a new roof. The labor and material.

  • @GunnarTobus
    @GunnarTobus 3 роки тому +71

    “Hey... So, we accidentally took out your roof by mistake...”
    “What? Why?”
    “That’s besides the point. Anyways, I’ve got a great a deal to replace it.”
    “Wait, I have to pay for MY roof to be replaced, after YOU somehow accidentally took it out?”
    *”Y e p.”*

  • @NikkyElso
    @NikkyElso 4 роки тому +2468

    They turned around quick when the local news called

    • @aprylcanales3310
      @aprylcanales3310 3 роки тому +63

      my thoughts exactly lmao

    • @MeekaI
      @MeekaI 3 роки тому +93

      Apryl Canales They didn’t wanna turn their 5 star company into a negative 5 star.

    • @zackperron6090
      @zackperron6090 3 роки тому +11

      @@MeekaI they probably wont make it thorough coved 19 anyways

    • @compoundinterestinsights
      @compoundinterestinsights 3 роки тому

      Elso 😂😂😂

    • @focusman7468
      @focusman7468 3 роки тому +2

      @@MeekaI the best comment !

  • @tyy2387
    @tyy2387 5 років тому +3198

    Imagine stealing someone’s car and telling the owner they won’t get it back but they can get them a good deal on a new one. They really thought they could get away with this logic?

    • @yytyytg
      @yytyytg 5 років тому +31

      The difference between theft and accidental damage is smaller than your ego.

    • @tj-bk1eb
      @tj-bk1eb 5 років тому +66

      @@yytyytg I think you meant to say "the difference between theft and accidental damage is as BIG as your ego" unless you were trying to agree with him

    • @yytyytg
      @yytyytg 5 років тому +6

      @@tj-bk1eb No that's exactly what I meant. "The difference between theft and accidental damage is smaller than your ego"

    • @tyy2387
      @tyy2387 5 років тому +32

      kang C So then that means ur agreeing with me? Or saying there isn’t a big difference? I think you’re trying too hard to defend this company. Accident or not it’s their fault and they should be held responsible, not the owner.

    • @Jack-wc3ob
      @Jack-wc3ob 5 років тому +21

      Tyy your reading comprehension is terrible. The difference between theft and accidental damage is huge. Which means the huge difference is still smaller than your extremely huge ego. His sentence forces you to think a little.

  • @maddg7471
    @maddg7471 3 роки тому +14

    Imagine a plumber going into someone’s bathroom, destroying the toilet, then says he can give them a deal.

    • @BattleBux
      @BattleBux 3 роки тому +3

      and you didn't even call the plumber, they broke in

  • @trevorsreya8277
    @trevorsreya8277 7 місяців тому +1

    If they messed up her roof, and then told her she had to pay them to fix it, that is literal extortion.

  • @elizabethtaylor6016
    @elizabethtaylor6016 5 років тому +3219

    They should be paying for the full cost of her roof being replaced. She should not be forced to use her personal insurance company her premiums will be raised.

    • @NG_KR
      @NG_KR 5 років тому +69

      It was her choice to go through Insurance apparently. They offered to do her roof for free based on their mistake. The get a better deal if all theh have to pay is the deductible vs 4000 mininum for the materials.

    • @dejanira2
      @dejanira2 5 років тому +64

      It is an honest mistake and they offered to repair the damage, she is being a pain not the roofing company!

    • @OffGridInvestor
      @OffGridInvestor 5 років тому +96

      @@dejanira2 it's not DAMAGE it's completely gone. In my country they would almost be hung for doing this. THEY ARE THE PAIN. So if I come around and tear your roof off will it be "an honest mistake" then? What if I accidentally drive my car thru the front wall of your house then tell you I will be back to brick it up in 3 weeks but "give you a deal". I bet it'd ALL BE DIFFERENT if it happened to you....

    • @Baffi_
      @Baffi_ 5 років тому +41

      Yeah her insurance company is going to sue that company for full reimbursement. But she’s left paying her deductible and her rates might be raised. Should have sued them herself

    • @kenhanson1712
      @kenhanson1712 5 років тому +49

      @@dejanira2 an honest mistake?! Haha they ripped apart her whole roof bud, not just dug a whole in her front yard.....was a huge mistake!!

  • @tcorris
    @tcorris 4 роки тому +3358

    She should go after the contractor’s business policy, not her homeowners. Their mistake, their responsibility.

    • @stevobriks02
      @stevobriks02 4 роки тому +100

      I would have remained calm and let them put the new one on before saying anything Lol.

    • @taoliu3949
      @taoliu3949 4 роки тому +35

      They offered to redo her roof for free, but she refused. Technically, they could have refused to pay the deductible since they have the capability to restore her roof, but that wouldn't make business sense since paying the $1000 deductible was a lot cheaper than them fixing the roof themselves.

    • @tcorris
      @tcorris 4 роки тому +108

      Tao Liu, they only offered to put a roof on after first refusing to do so without being paid. She was under no obligation to accept their offer after the company first refused to accept their responsibility for the repair. The homeowner has zero responsibility for the repair, and thus she is under no obligation to put this on her own insurance, for which she will likely face increased premiums for the claim. The roofing company is 100% financially responsible. It’s up to them to file a claim with their business insurance provider. If anyone should be facing increased insurance premiums for this error, it is the roofing company that made the mistake. Covering the costs of inadvertent property damage in the course of business is precisely what business liability insurance is there for. If this roofer doesn’t have liability insurance, that’s his problem, not the homeowner’s.

    • @Mrgrumpypants84
      @Mrgrumpypants84 4 роки тому +3

      @@stevobriks02 i said the same thing after watching it lol

    • @Mrgrumpypants84
      @Mrgrumpypants84 4 роки тому +20

      @@taoliu3949 wouldnt matter, she doesnt have to trust them to do any work at all. No judge would say "let them fix it" theyre clearly incompetent, personally if my roofer cant find the roof ill go elsewhere lol.

  • @Enrique-Garcia
    @Enrique-Garcia 8 місяців тому +1

    What I find truly amazing is these guys just showed up, GUESSED which house it was (every address is marked either on the house or the curb, or a mailbox, plus they were THREE houses away, not even close), and just started getting to work without ever bothering to notify the owner.

  • @ryancee7
    @ryancee7 3 роки тому +10

    This like Animal Crossing for the gamecune when a random villager was like "Hey I painted your roof pink, hope ya like it"

  • @miketyan1440
    @miketyan1440 3 роки тому +1103

    She’s not liable. She can sue for damages.

    • @automotivetv9861
      @automotivetv9861 3 роки тому +38

      It takes money to sue someone

    • @shamar8068
      @shamar8068 3 роки тому +4

      @@automotivetv9861 exactly

    • @TheAkashicTraveller
      @TheAkashicTraveller 3 роки тому +30

      @@automotivetv9861 Yeah but the person you sue pays not you. Also small claims is a thing.

    • @robang3473
      @robang3473 3 роки тому +9

      Sue them for 1million, pay the lawyer with that money

    • @mizukienriquez3197
      @mizukienriquez3197 3 роки тому +1

      Suing only makes lawyers rich

  • @damn671
    @damn671 3 роки тому +1486

    If I was the homeowner, I'd file for Vandalism, Trespassing and Theft. Or all of the above.

    • @gauchesuedo
      @gauchesuedo 3 роки тому +25

      The first two would fly, the third not so much - they didn't steal anything.

    • @damn671
      @damn671 3 роки тому +72

      Grant Stokes Well, theft means taking someone's personal property without their permission... so even if tiny piece of roof is missing, that's still considered a theft 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @gauchesuedo
      @gauchesuedo 3 роки тому +18

      @@damn671 Um, no, that's entirely untrue. There is a defined under-limit of value for what constitutes theft. Roofing, an already cheap material, would not qualify theft - especially in a situation like this where it was an accident.

    • @0623kaboom
      @0623kaboom 3 роки тому +17

      @@gauchesuedo actually they removed it so it is vandalism the theft portion comes from removing any portion of the materials from the roof ... since the dropped it all on the ground it is theft ... as the reroofing will cost over 2grand it is theft over ... so trespass, vandalism and theft all apply ... welcome to canadian law ...
      .
      remember even shoplifting ... if the person makes it to the door it is theft ... because it has been removed from the shelf ... once they pass the door it becomes robbery under ... which is worse ...

    • @gauchesuedo
      @gauchesuedo 3 роки тому +29

      @@0623kaboom By that logic, taking an item off of a shelf and leaving it somewhere else in the store is theft. You're flat out wrong - moving something from one place of someone's property to another isn't theft, nor is it robbery. Vandalism maybe, albeit unintentional, but it's just not in any way theft.

  • @M-X39462
    @M-X39462 9 місяців тому +2

    I like how they had started coming up with solutions to help once she started getting news crews involved

  • @8thdayadventist911
    @8thdayadventist911 3 роки тому +2

    You know a company is trash and shady when they call it "five stars roofing".

  • @HeresJohnnyKat
    @HeresJohnnyKat 5 років тому +2473

    if i came home to a company redoing my roof, i'd wait till they were done .. then say thanks for the free roof

    • @duttydiesel8303
      @duttydiesel8303 5 років тому +17

      My thoughts exactly...

    • @duttydiesel8303
      @duttydiesel8303 5 років тому +122

      @Derka Derka - if the new roof leaks you call and do the exact same thing she did. You can file reports under the Better Business Bureau as well as the police and the insurance company.

    • @jolliebear5706
      @jolliebear5706 5 років тому +6

      Johnny Kat RIGHT

    • @PO-PANDA
      @PO-PANDA 5 років тому +5

      Doge - how is the bbb a fraud?

    • @AlexLepinski
      @AlexLepinski 5 років тому

      Fact xd. 😂

  • @breakingtoast2255
    @breakingtoast2255 3 роки тому +1435

    Its called five star roofing cos through the gaps in the roof at night you can see at least 5 shiny stars

    • @gillie3696
      @gillie3696 3 роки тому +19

      What gaps there is no roof haha

    • @owenoreilly_20
      @owenoreilly_20 3 роки тому +6

      I had a roof Re-done and gutters, on the roof they stepped into the drywall in one part where there isn’t a attic two times, and they only put 3 wood screws in the gutters Becuase they somehow forgot to finish it

    • @edwardrebeaudiii9109
      @edwardrebeaudiii9109 3 роки тому

      Lol

    • @tixximmi
      @tixximmi 3 роки тому +4

      You had the best answer. :)

    • @SnootchieBootchies27
      @SnootchieBootchies27 3 роки тому

      Nice

  • @lalakuma9
    @lalakuma9 9 місяців тому

    The company should be charged for the crimes of theft and trespassing.

  • @sergiofonseca2285
    @sergiofonseca2285 9 місяців тому

    They initially denied to replace the roof and offered a discount on a new roof, then after the story went public they offered to replace it or pay the deductibles of her insurance.
    Shady AF

  • @lewisivory1288
    @lewisivory1288 4 роки тому +2239

    She shouldn’t have to pay anything they should offer her a new roof and probably an upgraded roof. I am surprised she hasn’t sued them

  • @maniacmagge2568
    @maniacmagge2568 5 років тому +2535

    "Five Stars Roofing", the irony in that name

    • @Bigrignohio
      @Bigrignohio 5 років тому +37

      Maniac Magge Five out of ten?

    • @hantuafiq2
      @hantuafiq2 5 років тому +4

      @@Bigrignohio GTA

    • @token6274
      @token6274 5 років тому +14

      5 out of 100 I’m guessing

    • @JasonBlooey
      @JasonBlooey 5 років тому

      **insert curb your enthusiasm meme**

    • @pulsar9354
      @pulsar9354 5 років тому +6

      she almost could see the whole night sky full of stars thanks to them.

  • @AfraidMonsters
    @AfraidMonsters 9 місяців тому +1

    wth? how can they get away with this?? they should pay her everything it costs to replace, and MORE. I wouldn't want them to do my roof, even for free, too.

  • @lolaridgeback5875
    @lolaridgeback5875 10 місяців тому +4

    Crazy they take your roof off then try and charge you for a new one.

  • @HitchedBug
    @HitchedBug 4 роки тому +1212

    Word of advice. If the company has “five star” as the name, it’s not five stars

    • @AG-Consulting
      @AG-Consulting 4 роки тому +31

      Same for a president who keeps claiming to be an expert.

    • @GoldenGod69
      @GoldenGod69 4 роки тому +11

      My dads company is 5 star floors, he is one of the best flooring companies in the bay area. Exception to the rules though lol

    • @NikkyElso
      @NikkyElso 4 роки тому +1

      Not like she asked for it done though 😅

    • @shawnpitman876
      @shawnpitman876 4 роки тому +2

      Word of advice, it makes you seem ignorant when you act like she ASKED for them to do this, when it was CLEARLY stated they were at the WRONG HOUSE.

    • @tstanley01
      @tstanley01 4 роки тому +1

      kind of like anything with quality in the title...

  • @thehollyannrose
    @thehollyannrose 5 років тому +2454

    If she doesn't want them to fix the roof, they should pay someone else to fix it for her. I would understand why she wouldn't want them to fix it. They would probably screw it up to get back at her.

    • @StephanBranczyk
      @StephanBranczyk 5 років тому +64

      Not only that but as demonstrated by the story, they're probably uninsured. And the situation could get 1000 times worse if the homeowner willingly lets the workers of an uninsured contractor work on her roof.

    • @EpicMinerNK
      @EpicMinerNK 5 років тому +33

      Hoeyann if you listened to the end of the video, it said that the company that made the mistake paid the 1000$ fee in order to have the lady’s roof build by the company she wanted. That’s a completely sensible and honest way of dealing with it, so I’m not sure why you’re mad. The company that made the mistake essentially gave her a free new roof with the company she wanted.

    • @thehollyannrose
      @thehollyannrose 5 років тому +41

      @@EpicMinerNK insurance would still raise her rates, for something that wasn't even remotely her fault and wasn't an "act of god". are they going to pay the difference for that too???

    • @EpicMinerNK
      @EpicMinerNK 5 років тому +10

      Hoeyann good point I didn’t think about that

    • @thehollyannrose
      @thehollyannrose 5 років тому +9

      @@EpicMinerNK i hope they do cover that. stories like these make me more scared to own a home in the future lol something simular happened to my parents, but my mom was home and was like "wtf are you doing?" lol

  • @mandipsalh960
    @mandipsalh960 10 місяців тому +3

    Call the police. Have the roofers arrested for property damage and vandalism.

  • @scikick
    @scikick 3 роки тому +1

    The company needs to be sued for damages + loss of use.

  • @terrierlover
    @terrierlover 4 роки тому +1131

    “We will do it for free” I don’t why but that tone comes off as if they’re doing her a favor.

    • @torresvlogz6843
      @torresvlogz6843 4 роки тому +18

      Lol 😂 i know right

    • @erikdornhoff1127
      @erikdornhoff1127 4 роки тому +22

      I just found it funny how she want it for free but wants another place to do it. At that point she would just be able to get materials free from the place that fucked up

    • @tksaint8429
      @tksaint8429 4 роки тому +100

      erik dornhoff because they would do a bad job obviously since it’s coming out of their own pocket.

    • @etan5716
      @etan5716 4 роки тому +24

      Swazi someone’s got common sense.

    • @erikdornhoff1127
      @erikdornhoff1127 4 роки тому +10

      @@tksaint8429 "obviously". What. If they do bad job then it's just going back to the news. They already looking bad they don't want to look worse. I imagine if something like this were to happen again they would have to lower prices just to get customers

  • @DragonBuilds
    @DragonBuilds 5 років тому +710

    At least it's not a demolition company

    • @GeneralG1810
      @GeneralG1810 5 років тому +23

      LOL now THAT would be news XD

    • @hydrogencyanide4999
      @hydrogencyanide4999 5 років тому +20

      @@GeneralG1810 That actually happened once. Not kidding.

    • @GeneralG1810
      @GeneralG1810 5 років тому +6

      Wow free new house, mind you the loss of sentimental items would have been devastating

    • @Jack1rules
      @Jack1rules 5 років тому +3

      Hydrogen Cyanide really? Can you link a video?

    • @cottonpreppinpoor2709
      @cottonpreppinpoor2709 5 років тому

      By far the best comment yet lol.

  • @badlandskid
    @badlandskid 3 роки тому +2

    I’ve seen that happen. Storm chasers tore off the wrong roof. They offered a “deal” to finish it. Later that summer when it rained the roof leaked all over.

  • @matts9371
    @matts9371 3 роки тому +1

    That company should have paid out of pocket from the get go. The fact they initially offered a deal was a sign to talk to a lawyer and sue.

  • @mogotrevo
    @mogotrevo 5 років тому +895

    If you remove the wrong person's roof you need to replace it for free, that's just how it should be.

    • @thadiussean9133
      @thadiussean9133 5 років тому +106

      No. They need to pay the cost for someone else to replace it. If someone removed my roof, I wouldn't trust them to put in a new one without cutting corners.

    • @mogotrevo
      @mogotrevo 5 років тому +32

      I do agree with you Thadius.
      Also Tyler, it appears to me they didn't offer to do it for free until they got attention in the media :)

    • @bogasixtyeight5153
      @bogasixtyeight5153 5 років тому +2

      Thadius Sean exactly

    • @debendragurung3033
      @debendragurung3033 5 років тому +3

      @@thadiussean9133 exactly my thought. She shouldn't trust if it's done for free.

    • @maunster3414
      @maunster3414 5 років тому +3

      Espero, if you remove the wrong person's roof you need to replace it for free, that's just how it should be. Including on whichever other company she chooses and her missed income and travel at the least.

  • @Princess0fTwilight83
    @Princess0fTwilight83 5 років тому +1792

    That's bull dude. They deserve it for free.

    • @six6nix587
      @six6nix587 5 років тому +51

      Vincent the Mortician the company offered to do it for free or to pay her insurance deductible. What’s bull about that?

    • @ryanyeoman109
      @ryanyeoman109 5 років тому +104

      @@six6nix587 because they only said that after they were going to charge her to do it. they are scumbags and a dishonest company.

    • @OneEyedSnakes
      @OneEyedSnakes 5 років тому +8

      Dat whyt kyd so you would rather pay thousands of dollars rather than get it for free?

    • @dyna_dzn
      @dyna_dzn 5 років тому +5

      I could be wrong but pretty sure I’m not, the company did offer to do it for free or they will pay the deductible for another roofing company to do it.

    • @tikdoe7563
      @tikdoe7563 5 років тому +24

      @@dyna_dzn
      Are you deaf or did you not watch the video or READ the title. They offered her a DEAL and then when the tv station contacted her all of a sudden they said they'd do it for free "if she wanted it" as if any normal human being wouldn't expect them to pay for the damages.

  • @williamstanton7847
    @williamstanton7847 9 місяців тому

    It was more than fair that the roofing company offered to fix their mistake and give the lady a new roof!

  • @04dram04
    @04dram04 5 років тому +887

    Easy lawsuit

    • @control2791
      @control2791 5 років тому +5

      so's the fake lambo buisness

    • @rayrandy41
      @rayrandy41 5 років тому +1

      Easy not really she wasn't out any money. Im sure insurnace paid it. Therefore in court they consider that a settlement and she would lose.

    • @dreamsteal4773
      @dreamsteal4773 5 років тому +2

      tehgreatmutato she could’ve sued for property damages. And won

    • @100subscribeswithnovidoe5
      @100subscribeswithnovidoe5 5 років тому

      No the women’s at fault I found out more of a report

    • @matthewcino
      @matthewcino 5 років тому

      Yea roofing company would be burned to the ground.

  • @601salsa
    @601salsa 5 років тому +547

    Lawsuit. Criminal damage, tresspassing and stress.

    • @cc-gf7qu
      @cc-gf7qu 5 років тому +12

      601salsa stress ??? lol u can file a lawsuit for someone causing stress?

    • @ciangibbons6643
      @ciangibbons6643 5 років тому +15

      @@cc-gf7qu Undue stress is valid only in the case of occurring from another act that is being sued or prosecuted.

    • @gzer0x
      @gzer0x 5 років тому +3

      CC F you can in civil court. It is used to determine monetary compensation.

    • @scp049hasbreachedcontianme9
      @scp049hasbreachedcontianme9 5 років тому

      Vandalism too

    • @AverageCarl69
      @AverageCarl69 5 років тому +2

      Yeah it's called emotional distress or something, usually used against family cases and such

  • @arvurebantra7639
    @arvurebantra7639 8 місяців тому

    I don't even understand why they would send a crew to a home that doesn't have anyone there to confirm it. If no one is at my home, I would be PISSED if this happened, and I don't know why companies would even do that.

  • @dean2663
    @dean2663 Рік тому +1

    How is the roofing company not in jail for trespassing, destruction of property etc?

  • @Gi-Home
    @Gi-Home 3 роки тому +642

    The roofers insurance should pay, this has absolutely nothing to do with the homeowners insurance company except to provide emergency coverage and then collect from the roofers insurance. Given the poor attitude of the roofer they should be made to pay a few thousand dollars to the affected homeowner. Frankly their attitude to do right by this woman invites distrust.

    • @TX_b
      @TX_b 3 роки тому +21

      Exactly the roofers are 100% liable

    • @calicocritterscrafts886
      @calicocritterscrafts886 3 роки тому +28

      Funny how quickly the roofing company decided they could do her roof for free after the news got involved. I hate that it takes negative publicity to force companies to do right 🙄😒 And she is absolutely right not to use them. If they made this big of a mistake just in house number imagine the quality of work.

    • @Beezlie727
      @Beezlie727 3 роки тому +3

      @@calicocritterscrafts886 They may have excellent roofers. It could just be their office staff that sucks. Writing incorrect house numbers on the work ticket isn't the roofers' fault.

    • @kittylynndale5264
      @kittylynndale5264 3 роки тому +11

      @@Beezlie727 but tossing those shingles and all of that other debris on all sides of the property is their fault. Even if they couldn’t get a dumpster behind the house, that doesn’t mean they couldn’t lay down some tarps to protect the ground underneath from the debris. This family is probably going to be picking up nails for ages to come.

    • @IJustWantToUseMyName
      @IJustWantToUseMyName 3 роки тому +10

      I would be concerned about the quality of materials they would use since the company would want to lose as little as possible when replacing it. Hiring a different roofer to replace it guarantees she gets what she had before.

  • @Milesco
    @Milesco 5 років тому +510

    The mistaken roofing company is liable for the full cost of a new roof, not just the homeowner's insurance deductible.

    • @m.r.rodriguez141
      @m.r.rodriguez141 4 роки тому +27

      The homeowner insurance will go after them for sure.

    • @SL-lz9jr
      @SL-lz9jr 4 роки тому +20

      @@m.r.rodriguez141 Exactly. While it sucks to have a claim against your insurance history (which does affect your premium rates and eligiblity with some insurance companies), the insurance company has their team of lawyers to recoup any losses they think they should be compensated for. That's the beauty of insurance. And, in the grand scheme of things, paying that $1000 deductible in small beans compared to the price of a new roof, which, depending on where you live, the size of the roof and roofing material... it's tens of thousands of dollars. Totally worth filing that claim if your insurance will cover it. BTW, the roofing company also has their own insurance policy... THEY should pay for it and file it with their own insurance and let them take the hit on THEIR insurance claim history.

    • @drewbaum4539
      @drewbaum4539 4 роки тому +2

      Yep smells like a lawsuit

    • @mikeawad8707
      @mikeawad8707 3 роки тому

      @@drewbaum4539 what could she get out of a lawsuit?

    • @drewbaum4539
      @drewbaum4539 3 роки тому +1

      Mike Awad all money back + a new properly done roof + personal damages...

  • @kingofreels3248
    @kingofreels3248 11 місяців тому

    Solid company for owning up to the mistake and offering to pay for it. Bravo

    • @SCP_Bright
      @SCP_Bright 10 місяців тому

      They didn't offer to pay for it they wanted to charge her for it

  • @hailmanning1332
    @hailmanning1332 3 роки тому +6

    Whoever the contractor is who wrapped her roof for her to protect it afterwards should be commended for being so nice. Who was it?

    • @jaypee9575
      @jaypee9575 10 місяців тому +4

      What's nice about doing a job you're paid for?

  • @beccalyn9196
    @beccalyn9196 5 років тому +869

    Take their ass to court! They touched your roof without your permission!!

    • @FaithandNova
      @FaithandNova 5 років тому +66

      @3 Subscribers Without Any Videos!!!!! doesn't matter you can still sue them.

    • @vinnie2033
      @vinnie2033 5 років тому +6

      That's a small claims court. Which won't do much, or even take forever in court.

    • @sagefortei9078
      @sagefortei9078 5 років тому +34

      3 Subscribers Without Any Videos!!!!! After they were publicly criticized, before that they weren’t going to fix anything you imbecile.

    • @darmalife06
      @darmalife06 5 років тому +6

      We live in a society where everyone is trying to take anyone to court... They said they'd fix it, so court is unnecessary

    • @JACpotatos
      @JACpotatos 5 років тому +1

      @@FaithandNova just to be a Sue happy useless leech?

  • @romanking3547
    @romanking3547 5 років тому +454

    Judge Judy would LOVE this case

    • @ms.lolitagore5822
      @ms.lolitagore5822 5 років тому +6

      Hell Yeah

    • @PLASTICPOPCORN4
      @PLASTICPOPCORN4 5 років тому +5

      this might be more money than she handles in her cases lol

    • @lizzytheowl577
      @lizzytheowl577 5 років тому +19

      Actually she'd hate it because she hates idiots. She'd enjoy making the company pay for a new roof though.

    • @fancybrooks3156
      @fancybrooks3156 5 років тому +6

      So would Judge Milian of The People's Court.

    • @kevinpadot7545
      @kevinpadot7545 5 років тому +9

      That episode would be 2 minutes long lol. She would own their asses as soon as she is told what transpired

  • @annpachini2155
    @annpachini2155 9 місяців тому

    Should go with that company and make them replace the entire roof and clean up their mess

  • @PrinceofMacedonVlogs
    @PrinceofMacedonVlogs 10 місяців тому +3

    call the police for destruction of property

  • @jakobflores5382
    @jakobflores5382 5 років тому +291

    Pretty sure thats vandalism but I also just saw a guy get charged for returning a lost phone so i dont know whats up with the world anymore.

    • @alexa9433
      @alexa9433 5 років тому +31

      That's why nobody helps each other anymore. Fear of getting in trouble for no reason

    • @anguspontin7244
      @anguspontin7244 5 років тому +26

      How does one get charged for returning someone else’s lost property?

    • @MrMrremmington
      @MrMrremmington 5 років тому +8

      I have found three phones in the park that is next to my building where I am the groundskeeper. I look for the name mom or a friend on the phone and phone that person. They usually know who lost a phone. I’ve got bottles of wine offers of money and all kinds of treats and I am in Canada so don’t give up hope.

    • @Mom2BoysBH
      @Mom2BoysBH 5 років тому +4

      @@anguspontin7244 He didn't return it right away, he held onto it for a day. Not that that makes it right but that was the reason.

    • @anguspontin7244
      @anguspontin7244 5 років тому +6

      Tracey W yh coz one mans fuckup is another mans priority

  • @PhxSml
    @PhxSml 5 років тому +59

    We own a roofing company and we once removed the roof from the neighbors instead of the house we were suppose to do. Silly thing is that the person was on a trip and couldn’t be reached. When he came back he had a new roof for free. We made sure things like that never happened again. It was costly lol

    • @joejones4172
      @joejones4172 10 місяців тому +11

      You did the right thing.

  • @marywilmington6671
    @marywilmington6671 10 місяців тому +1

    I recently had my roof replaced. The company stayed in constant contact with me. They even came by with the materials days before the job started and spoke to me about what to expect on the day the work would be done. I don't understand how they can remove the wrong roof. I wouldn't trust them to replace it after that either.

  • @Arcella1981
    @Arcella1981 8 місяців тому

    How in the heck does this even happen?! When ever I call some one to come do anything they always always knock on the door and make contact before doing anything

  • @stinknut762
    @stinknut762 5 років тому +253

    But 3 houses away? I could see if it was the house next door but wtf?
    You dont even knock on the door and say Hi, were here to do your roof?

    • @RonaldRegan314
      @RonaldRegan314 5 років тому +13

      Lol exactly

    • @BaldMancTwat
      @BaldMancTwat 5 років тому +7

      How do you know they didn't knock? The son called her so presumably he let them do it and assumed he hadn't been told.

    • @sirtnfol8476
      @sirtnfol8476 5 років тому +9

      Knock knock. Que como esta si enchilada senoirita la roofa. Thats why

    • @Cronic318
      @Cronic318 5 років тому +4

      Solo .01%Lmao I wish i could thumb this up twice!

    • @Radwxlf
      @Radwxlf 5 років тому +1

      @@sirtnfol8476 you got that right cousin Cletus heehaw we better go on n get, ma and sis waiting for us in bed

  • @archstone4622
    @archstone4622 5 років тому +442

    I guess if business is slow they can drive around neighborhoods and take anyone's shingles off, then offer them a deal to fix it.

  • @davidpawson9047
    @davidpawson9047 8 місяців тому

    The roofing company should pay for the repairs, even though they may not be the company that performs the work.

  • @mastakush4272
    @mastakush4272 8 місяців тому

    They vandalized they're home, sue them for 10x the value!!

  • @seigolokyz
    @seigolokyz 5 років тому +352

    if she went to the same roofing company they would have half assed the job and put cheap materials on it. good thing she didnt.

    • @OneEyedSnakes
      @OneEyedSnakes 5 років тому +2

      Okyz L2R that’s why you be smart and see what they offer, then sue if it’s not good enough or make them come back until it’s correct.

    • @lilianegrace4048
      @lilianegrace4048 5 років тому +22

      Yep, because it would’ve been “free” they’d try to minimize cost.

    • @m4ki9h76
      @m4ki9h76 5 років тому +1

      @@lilianegrace4048 / It's unlikely. Since the company made a mistake and removed her roof instead; doing her roof again would be compensation to make up for their mistake, the altenative being giving her money so she could hire the other company.
      It's no excuse to just use cheap shits because it's free. It's compensation, not free.
      Still they wasted her time though.

    • @cantsilenceme
      @cantsilenceme 5 років тому +2

      Kind of reminds me of tactics Auto Glass companies rely on for replacing car windows.

    • @m4ki9h76
      @m4ki9h76 5 років тому

      @@cantsilenceme / how does that work?

  • @joeyaikman9736
    @joeyaikman9736 3 роки тому +271

    Can’t they press charges for trespassing, theft, vandalism, or something similar? Or is that not an option due to it being a company entity that was responsible?

    • @catgamingftw8239
      @catgamingftw8239 3 роки тому +11

      Maybe for trespassing, definitely for vandalism. Probably not for theft, since it doesn’t appear they stole anything meaningful

    • @allisong5009
      @allisong5009 3 роки тому +2

      What did they steal?

    • @vulduv
      @vulduv 3 роки тому +30

      @@allisong5009 roof
      though maby it would fall under fraud sense they originaly wanted her to pay for a new one.
      thats like destroying someones car and then demanding they pay you to fix it.

    • @jdfutura
      @jdfutura 3 роки тому +12

      @@vulduv lol yup, that'd fall under racketeering & extorsion rather than theft.

    • @noctisocculta4820
      @noctisocculta4820 3 роки тому +4

      If they were planning to take the shingles away, then it definitely theft too. Theft is moving another's private property with the intent to deprive the owner of the property.
      Possibly blackmail( extortion?) also, since they offered a deal on a new roof instead of making amends.

  • @yukiochan1
    @yukiochan1 9 місяців тому

    They were there without permission. Proceeded to do damage to oersonal property, without permission. This is trespassing and vandalism. Take them to court for damages

  • @MsJapanino
    @MsJapanino 2 роки тому +2

    They said they would give her a “deal” on a new roof until they were contacted by the press. What a shady business.

  • @budgiebreder
    @budgiebreder 3 роки тому +247

    How is that an “honest” mistake!?
    I really hope the place 3 doors down also changed companies...

    • @its_tricky_dick
      @its_tricky_dick 3 роки тому +3

      By the fact the roofies were given the wrong address.

    • @budgiebreder
      @budgiebreder 3 роки тому +20

      @@its_tricky_dick were they though? Surely there would have been conversation? Eg roof colour choices, styles, quotes and things would have been decided prior to work. Usually these things are done in-person and generally also at the house where work is to be completed? How do you get it that wrong if all that has happened?

    • @budgiebreder
      @budgiebreder 3 роки тому +17

      @@its_tricky_dick at a bare minimum youd knock on the door and say “are you ready for work to begin?” And if no answer at least call and confirm before proceeding?

    • @eveevolution1607
      @eveevolution1607 3 роки тому +6

      @@budgiebreder The crew is not who sells the job the crew is the crew so if the office or project manager texted the address to the crew supervisor and was off by one number without realizing something like this could absolutely happen! The crew isn’t going to knock on your door. The go where they are told and do their job

    • @budgiebreder
      @budgiebreder 3 роки тому +5

      @@eveevolution1607 so the crew turns up to the “site” and doesnt knock on the door, or phone the client to say “we are here at the address of x. And are about to start.”

  • @jhui604
    @jhui604 5 років тому +527

    Lol yeah company says the right thing after being watched

    • @djawnsjhilson218
      @djawnsjhilson218 5 років тому +1

      Jordon Hui
      Seriously! If she wants a new roof?!

    • @realamazingworld6756
      @realamazingworld6756 5 років тому +8

      Yeah after she went to the media

    • @eilidhmac117
      @eilidhmac117 5 років тому +10

      Sometimes I feel like there is no hope for humanity. Why couldn’t they do the right thing for this woman before she had to contact the media and police.

  • @cjninebot13
    @cjninebot13 8 місяців тому

    Bill the construction workers who did that mistake, that should come out of there personal pocket

  • @John-sl1rk
    @John-sl1rk 8 місяців тому

    Grand theft should be charged and new roof replaced free of charge

  • @cameronangel1013
    @cameronangel1013 5 років тому +560

    Just let them finish the new roof then tell them

    • @jonguyton1
      @jonguyton1 5 років тому +47

      That would have been the thing to do.

    • @baneblackguard584
      @baneblackguard584 5 років тому +2

      think they realized the mistake midway through removing the shingles.

    • @MrFelixify
      @MrFelixify 5 років тому +1

      yeah. that was what i was thinking.

    • @D3sToD3s
      @D3sToD3s 5 років тому +4

      That would be just as illegal.

    • @Beeeezyyy
      @Beeeezyyy 5 років тому +2

      Bane BlackGuard they realized once she pulled up after her son had called her and told her there were ppl on the roof

  • @user-jy1bc3gw2q
    @user-jy1bc3gw2q 5 років тому +521

    Sue them. There's no way she wouldn't win. Someone came onto her property and seriously vandalized her house. A crime was committed, doesn't matter if it was accidental. I would destroy that business if they didn't fix their mistake.

    • @sparrowhawk5673
      @sparrowhawk5673 5 років тому +31

      But the news video says that they not only offered to fix it for free but to also now pay the $1000 for getting another company to do it.
      Sounds to me the company is trying to correct their wrong. Why go to no mercy?

    • @2011blueman
      @2011blueman 5 років тому +10

      If they're offering to pay the $1,000 she is much better off just taking them up on that offer rather than suing. If the insurance company then wants to go after the roofing company they can, but if she sues at this point she won't get anything since the money would go to her insurance company and the lawyer.

    • @boboso1341
      @boboso1341 5 років тому +25

      @@sparrowhawk5673 only one problem, according to the report if she wanted them to do the roof, "they would schedule her". It should have been top priority, not placed on a schedule. Plus from the beginning they should have finished the job without pay. She hadn't hired them but a mistake was made, therefore they should have fixed their mistake.

    • @JACpotatos
      @JACpotatos 5 років тому +4

      They offered a free roof!

    • @sparrowhawk5673
      @sparrowhawk5673 5 років тому +4

      @@boboso1341 , Scheduling is appropriate for any company.
      Why than kick them by assuming it wouldn't be the same week?

  • @TobyStahler-yp9ll
    @TobyStahler-yp9ll 9 місяців тому

    I'd have called the police, this is grand theft and the fact they offered a "deal" to correct their crime is grift.

  • @spectralight8412
    @spectralight8412 9 місяців тому

    How do you get to a location, start working and not even ask the owners if they’re either ready to get started or have the right address?

  • @wetree9939
    @wetree9939 5 років тому +131

    they give it to her for free after the incident gets noticed by media

    • @SWIFTO_SCYTHE
      @SWIFTO_SCYTHE 5 років тому +8

      They offer her a good deal discount for them to replace her roof... that they destroyed... they only did it free after the negative press.

    • @sheeplebarn333
      @sheeplebarn333 5 років тому +7

      actually they offered in the end to pay the $1000 deductible. news flash, the insurance company will file a lawsuit against the roofing company

    • @lovemuffin1963
      @lovemuffin1963 5 років тому +1

      Sheeple Barn only after the press got involved.

    • @kercchan3307
      @kercchan3307 5 років тому +1

      from the mess they left behind, I wouldnt let them anywhere near the job. A good contractor would have left zero mess after doing demo.

  • @l.m652
    @l.m652 4 роки тому +281

    Those guys are acting like they’re doing her a favor! I wouldn’t want them to do my roof either, on top of making mistakes they’re messy

    • @drewbaum4539
      @drewbaum4539 4 роки тому +18

      L. M No they were not messy. Everything in tear out was done properly. They had proper tarps and equipment to catch the shingle debris. They probably stopped as soon as they found out they had the wrong address. In a confusing situation like this I don’t blame them for leaving it temporarily. Management had probably sent them home for the day. I’m sure they came back within a day or so to clean things up.

    • @jakedelaney9252
      @jakedelaney9252 4 роки тому +1

      Just because they did the wrong house they shouldn’t be blasted. Mistakes happen, and they are willing to own up to it. With the cost of the roof being 6-7 thousand dollars it’s actually surprising that they would give a new one. And the fact that they were blasted on public news, cost them a fortune to fix what they have done, that’s a mistake that could put them out of business. But the pity of others is too high so they would rather sit there and complain.

    • @user-cy6gf2pj7y
      @user-cy6gf2pj7y 3 роки тому +2

      @@jakedelaney9252 So, hypothetically, in your mind it would be perfectly ok for me to replaced the windshield in your ride with a used one that has rock pecks in it? Hell, no!!! Your reasoning is so flawed that it isn't even funny!

    • @richmun3131
      @richmun3131 3 роки тому +2

      @@jakedelaney9252 ITS their fault!!! Surprising they would give her a new one?? They can't put her old shingles back on.

    • @richmun3131
      @richmun3131 3 роки тому +1

      @@drewbaum4539 Wasn't done properly.. there shouldn't be shingles up against the siding of the house on on the bushes. Sidewalls of house should have been tarped as well.

  • @arianebolt1575
    @arianebolt1575 2 роки тому

    Some friend of mine posted something like "That moment when you go to the moon and back for someone and they're like 'Well, I never asked you to'."
    How toxic.

  • @Spork448
    @Spork448 9 місяців тому

    Most of the roofing companies here deliver all the materials to your house the day before, so the workers can come the next morning and get started right away. Doing this, avoids the issue of mixing up a house, if someone is too lazy to triple check the address before starting work.

  • @forcedentry2010
    @forcedentry2010 3 роки тому +97

    "We make roofing easy for you!"
    So easy, you don't even have to call them to do it. They just show up and do the work.

  • @j.j.9511
    @j.j.9511 5 років тому +30

    They have a lot of nerve to think she'd pay them to fix their mistake or to have them do it period.

  • @Practice_Kindness-1st
    @Practice_Kindness-1st 9 місяців тому +1

    I wouldn't trust them within reach of my pinky finger. They would end up reusing the same roof they'd just removed. Shame on them for their "offer". 🤦‍♀

  • @jeffmclachlan8961
    @jeffmclachlan8961 3 роки тому +1

    She should just sue/charge the company for vandalism, property damages, trespassing. Surely get it fixed that way

  • @jlm10181978
    @jlm10181978 5 років тому +217

    Company screwed up they have to pay for it! Period end of story!!

    • @nothing2see315
      @nothing2see315 5 років тому +7

      This road paving crew in my town re paved a street and they messed up and didn't shore it properly so they had to rip it up and do it again and pay for it. Funny how when a company contracted by the government fucks up they dont argue and just fix the problem.

    • @triparadox.c
      @triparadox.c 5 років тому +4

      Period.. end of the story.. *but uses exclamation mark instead.*

    • @jlm10181978
      @jlm10181978 5 років тому +1

      Jovindio Wieuse emphasis is the key to the exclamation point!! Lol

    • @gomez1322
      @gomez1322 5 років тому +2

      They offered to pay and put it back but she wanted more "justice" so she filed a law suit.

    • @concentratecorner1744
      @concentratecorner1744 5 років тому

      @@gomez1322 ehh if i was the homeowner i wouldnt want those idiots on my roof after that...and now she has to deal with the construction etc at her house that she didnt need or want. So of course theres going to be a lawsuit to seek $ for the hassle she now has to endure etc.

  • @ican384
    @ican384 5 років тому +160

    Shouldn’t they check with the person in the house when arriving? Isn’t that what’s normally done

    • @MrStabby19812
      @MrStabby19812 5 років тому +6

      WASH POPPIN Yes they should of checked the owner was ready to have the work started. Considering her garage and drive way is blocked for one.

    • @ladydrone2345
      @ladydrone2345 5 років тому +16

      Maybe not always, if they've been told you won't be home. A couple years ago l was inside my house when a crew showed outside my (owned) townhouse. They installed lovely vinyl siding over 2 parts of the house that were previously painted and flaking. l sat and listened as they were doing this until they left, l made no move to stop them, lol. Later in the day they came and did the same thing to my next door neighbour's house, and obviously that was where they were meant to do the job. The company never did contact me, lol.

    • @allysonw8472
      @allysonw8472 5 років тому

      They may have tried to. It sounds like she was at work or out somewhere else. Earlier in the video she spoke about "wanting to get home as soon as possible". They may have tried and no one answered, or the son did not realizing they had the wrong place. Not that it justifies in any way how they handled the situation after the fact.

    • @LS-ye5pp
      @LS-ye5pp 5 років тому +1

      Yeah, we always knock. I forgot to knock one time when I was bidding a job and had a gun pointed at me by a tenant lol

    • @johncuervo3019
      @johncuervo3019 5 років тому

      @@ladydrone2345 your neighbor paid for your house to have siding put up or maybe hoa

  • @patriciarouse2801
    @patriciarouse2801 3 роки тому +1

    Corporation criminality includes evading liability and providing a management style attitude toward damages to victums.

  • @davemiller6055
    @davemiller6055 9 місяців тому

    Mind boggling that they think they are not liable for replacing that roof, because they 100% are. Their mistake, they eat the cost. That's how that works.

  • @stupidplumbing2343
    @stupidplumbing2343 5 років тому +93

    This is the country we live in now. The company screwed up, and the only way they were willing to make it right, was after the home owners (victims) went to the news station and a story was done.

    • @kysike666
      @kysike666 5 років тому

      Stupid Plumbing There is no Justice in this forsaken country..
      Hard working tax payers always gets used and abused,no help from govt. and cops who’d rather see us all suffer..

    • @rees5124
      @rees5124 5 років тому +2

      Stupid Plumbing I’d agree but this is in Canada

    • @stupidplumbing2343
      @stupidplumbing2343 5 років тому

      @@rees5124 I didn't realize that. Thank you.

    • @ba.diecast24
      @ba.diecast24 5 років тому

      QC MP nope

    • @coolmoon4382
      @coolmoon4382 5 років тому +2

      @QC MP .. Oshawa Canada... Not the U.S...