I already bought the 18-45mm kit lens with my canon r50. I am wondering if I should go with the 24mm or sigma 18-50mm for taking pictures of my family during christmas..
I'd go for the Sigma if you want a versatile family/vacation lens and don't mind the lack of IS. Sigma 18-50 2.8 is a great lens for all around. Had one with my A6100 and it was a little beast.
Sure. Especially if you own the full frame body it will give you some wider FOV for the macro and talking head shots. I think it's a great lens for food videos and photography!
Excellent Video! Report: I have the same rig (Canon R50 + 24mm) Question: What is the exact focal length in this half sensor and full sensor lens? Thanks
Well I needed a cheaper 4k video camera, with mic port and reasonalbe photography capabilities(+the tilt screen as a bonus). The R50 was a first choice because of the price-to-quality ratio you get and since I use the full frame cameras for most of the time, it wasn't worth to pay the extra 200$ for R10 or double the price for R7(I think the RP is a better choice because it's FF and you can get it with 35 1.8 for the price of R7 due to CB and recent promotions). I think R50 is a great value. Sure, if I had some free extra bucks I'd probably get the R10, but I'm really happy with R50 for the things I use it for.
YT just recommended me this because I've been watching a lot of videos about the R10 (would be my first camera). That's a very cool video, bro. Also I found it useful to get a better look at how things look with 24mm on a crop sensor. Would you recommed 24, 35 or 50mm for a versatile portrait lens (indoors or outdoors), considering the crop magnification?
Thanks for the feedback mate!- always good to know how people find my vids. Since I'm all out 35mm shooter with the FF, I am a fan of 23/24 mm lens for crop sensors - however for typical portrait lens for aps-c. I'd probably choose the 35mm. It's a nifty fifty equivalent and will get you better bokeh for close up shots and will be usable in many indoor situations, where the 50mm(85 on FF) would probalby be too tight. On the other hand if you like environmental ports - the 24 would be better. But, yeah, for the sweet spot - 35mm is probably the best. Cheers!
@@DigitalRetro that's exactly what I want: a reliable lens for portraits with good looking bokeh, while for other purposes the kit lens will have to do for a while. So I'm probably getting the 35mm to have a nifty fifty. Thank you very much, brother!
Put it on full frame, that lens simply deserves it!
I already bought the 18-45mm kit lens with my canon r50. I am wondering if I should go with the 24mm or sigma 18-50mm for taking pictures of my family during christmas..
I'd go for the Sigma if you want a versatile family/vacation lens and don't mind the lack of IS. Sigma 18-50 2.8 is a great lens for all around. Had one with my A6100 and it was a little beast.
Hello DigitalRetro. I shoots cooking videos in the kitchen. Is the RF 24mm suitable for this?
Sure. Especially if you own the full frame body it will give you some wider FOV for the macro and talking head shots. I think it's a great lens for food videos and photography!
Is it this 24mm lens is the same as full frame on 50mm? In term of wider
This lens on R50 or any other aps-c camera will give you approx 35mm Full Frame equilvalent.
Great video! ❤
Thank you 🙏
Excellent Video!
Report: I have the same rig (Canon R50 + 24mm)
Question: What is the exact focal length in this half sensor and full sensor lens? Thanks
Thanks mate. The Canon's APS-C ratio is 1.6 so you get the 38,5mm full frame equivalent on cameras like R50/R100, R7.
Is there a reason why you picked r50 over the r10 or r7 😮
Well I needed a cheaper 4k video camera, with mic port and reasonalbe photography capabilities(+the tilt screen as a bonus).
The R50 was a first choice because of the price-to-quality ratio you get and since I use the full frame cameras for most of the time, it wasn't worth to pay the extra 200$ for R10 or double the price for R7(I think the RP is a better choice because it's FF and you can get it with 35 1.8 for the price of R7 due to CB and recent promotions).
I think R50 is a great value. Sure, if I had some free extra bucks I'd probably get the R10, but I'm really happy with R50 for the things I use it for.
Woah! Some of the clips look like a full frame man! Also sharp, but "cinematic" at the same time! Did you use some filters?
@@photobeard4505 all R50 material was shot without any diffusion filters. I just use a protective filter on the lens 📷
@@DigitalRetroa uv lens ?
YT just recommended me this because I've been watching a lot of videos about the R10 (would be my first camera). That's a very cool video, bro. Also I found it useful to get a better look at how things look with 24mm on a crop sensor. Would you recommed 24, 35 or 50mm for a versatile portrait lens (indoors or outdoors), considering the crop magnification?
Thanks for the feedback mate!- always good to know how people find my vids. Since I'm all out 35mm shooter with the FF, I am a fan of 23/24 mm lens for crop sensors - however for typical portrait lens for aps-c. I'd probably choose the 35mm. It's a nifty fifty equivalent and will get you better bokeh for close up shots and will be usable in many indoor situations, where the 50mm(85 on FF) would probalby be too tight. On the other hand if you like environmental ports - the 24 would be better. But, yeah, for the sweet spot - 35mm is probably the best. Cheers!
@@DigitalRetro that's exactly what I want: a reliable lens for portraits with good looking bokeh, while for other purposes the kit lens will have to do for a while. So I'm probably getting the 35mm to have a nifty fifty. Thank you very much, brother!
😮
i gave up! You sold it to me :)
Ha! Have fun with it friend!