🖖😎👍Very cool and very nicely well done and very well executed and informatively explained in every detail way shape and form provided on this format and subject matter on the various different designs and styles of Starship's and their proformances and missions required for each and every vessel, A job very nicely well done indeed Sir!.
The cool thing about the Constitution class is just how modular and expandable it is. You can have the same ship go from a core Explorer to a Heavy variant and back based on situational needs. Like the Enterprise herself, evidently.
The TOS and TMP era ships made the most sense because they were modular designs used for different ship classes. The Conny saucer section / nacelles were the same configuration used in the Miranda class / Saladin etc....
@@Xightly_Loopid_001 almost to the point I would hesitate calling them 'classes' in lieu of 'configurations', but, I know I wouldn't be entirely accurate.
Kinda hard to keep track of it all. But very intricate! I admire that you've divided the Timelines as you have. Others insist that STD/SNW is in the same history as TOS when this clearly isn't the case.
if your basis for this is discontinuity with visual cannon, then you might as well throw out half of everything after the original series, but before new trick as well, even with scale issues, technically the defiant class starship has had a bunch of different sizes, something that itself, discrepancies alone, has been a minimal prong of descent to say that they’re different timelines. Do I think they got a little ambitious with their visual choices, absolutely. But it visual continuity is all that is requires for one to spawn a new timeline than the first on screen mistake should spawn new timelines, and if you really wanna even throw out intentionality, then the redesign of the Klingon in the motion picture should’ve spawned the new timeline as well as the redesign of the D-7 in the motion, picture or any other redesign that essentially has ever occurred or an evolution that does not respect a singular visual trajectory, barely agreed upon by the community aside from exaltations of made by Jefferies and Jefferies alone.
Very good job on the presentation - thanks. Very interesting. One item that comes to mind; the amount of 7000 ships is far too few for the amount of space, exploration missions, patrol and escort that would be needed. Even in one, small blue planet if you take the US, & China you are up to over 1000 ships in service. Add in the rest of the world's fleets you will be over 2k. And even with that number we do not seem to be able to stop all sea crimes and piracy. Unless you live by a major base seeing a military ship is not that common and somewhat rare. Now given the size of the Federation's territory the number doesn't make sense. Just my opinion.
7,000 Federation Starships would avg out to be one per every 3-4 light years, also the transwarp conduit network would greatly increase this ratio coverage wise. Likely the UFP would only have to secure shipping lanes near or around the quadrant borders. Also a few thousand Warp capable shuttles also would contribute to UFP logistics undertaking smaller duties. Yes I would agree more Starships makes sense, however a number was given in Discovery so that is what there is to work with.
I'm sorry but you the Franklin class NX in this of Border security vessels. That ship's design come from an alternate time line and was supposed to NX class of the prime time line which we know. I know some will argue to let them in but I don't agree. The starship of that story line don't keep to original beliefs or purpose.
Franklin canonically precedes the timeline split and was built as a Warp 4 testbed for the NX project, making it a precursor to the NX Enterprise class and not a replacement
OK, this is interesting, but VERY hard to listen to. The narration sounds like an AI voice that's having a seizure of some kind... Impossible to follow.
🖖😎👍Very cool and very nicely well done and very well executed and informatively explained in every detail way shape and form provided on this format and subject matter on the various different designs and styles of Starship's and their proformances and missions required for each and every vessel, A job very nicely well done indeed Sir!.
The cool thing about the Constitution class is just how modular and expandable it is. You can have the same ship go from a core Explorer to a Heavy variant and back based on situational needs.
Like the Enterprise herself, evidently.
The TOS and TMP era ships made the most sense because they were modular designs used for different ship classes. The Conny saucer section / nacelles were the same configuration used in the Miranda class / Saladin etc....
@@Xightly_Loopid_001 almost to the point I would hesitate calling them 'classes' in lieu of 'configurations', but, I know I wouldn't be entirely accurate.
Kinda hard to keep track of it all. But very intricate! I admire that you've divided the Timelines as you have. Others insist that STD/SNW is in the same history as TOS when this clearly isn't the case.
if your basis for this is discontinuity with visual cannon, then you might as well throw out half of everything after the original series, but before new trick as well, even with scale issues, technically the defiant class starship has had a bunch of different sizes, something that itself, discrepancies alone, has been a minimal prong of descent to say that they’re different timelines. Do I think they got a little ambitious with their visual choices, absolutely. But it visual continuity is all that is requires for one to spawn a new timeline than the first on screen mistake should spawn new timelines, and if you really wanna even throw out intentionality, then the redesign of the Klingon in the motion picture should’ve spawned the new timeline as well as the redesign of the D-7 in the motion, picture or any other redesign that essentially has ever occurred or an evolution that does not respect a singular visual trajectory, barely agreed upon by the community aside from exaltations of made by Jefferies and Jefferies alone.
I wonder how would you carry out Starfleet plans to explore the Gamma Quadrant pre war?
great vid new sub !
Very good job on the presentation - thanks. Very interesting. One item that comes to mind; the amount of 7000 ships is far too few for the amount of space, exploration missions, patrol and escort that would be needed. Even in one, small blue planet if you take the US, & China you are up to over 1000 ships in service. Add in the rest of the world's fleets you will be over 2k. And even with that number we do not seem to be able to stop all sea crimes and piracy. Unless you live by a major base seeing a military ship is not that common and somewhat rare. Now given the size of the Federation's territory the number doesn't make sense. Just my opinion.
7,000 Federation Starships would avg out to be one per every 3-4 light years, also the transwarp conduit network would greatly increase this ratio coverage wise. Likely the UFP would only have to secure shipping lanes near or around the quadrant borders. Also a few thousand Warp capable shuttles also would contribute to UFP logistics undertaking smaller duties. Yes I would agree more Starships makes sense, however a number was given in Discovery so that is what there is to work with.
I'm sorry but you the Franklin class NX in this of Border security vessels. That ship's design come from an alternate time line and was supposed to NX class of the prime time line which we know. I know some will argue to let them in but I don't agree. The starship of that story line don't keep to original beliefs or purpose.
Franklin canonically precedes the timeline split and was built as a Warp 4 testbed for the NX project, making it a precursor to the NX Enterprise class and not a replacement
@@MS-qx9uw No. Jar Jar Trek is not preceding a damn thing.
OMFG just NOOOOOOOOOOO
OK, this is interesting, but VERY hard to listen to. The narration sounds like an AI voice that's having a seizure of some kind... Impossible to follow.
the fake trek can go kick rocks