The inconsistencies in the way "he" said 7800 was another turn off, too. It still amazes me that in 2024 we are still using computer generated voices for tech review videos. Lol!
The power consumption is not 100 W more than the 4700. It's around 50W. AMD display the card consumtion and not the GPU as previuos AMD or current nvidia GPU. Some reviewers have done test with mesures on the complete ¨PC consumption.
I was worried I'd have to buy a new PSU going from a Ryzen 3600 + 5700 XT to a Ryzen 7600x + 7800 XT. Nope. 360W-430W while gaming. 480W max load. Nvidia fans have people believing the new card is like Electro, gulping up power... not so.
okay now im 100% convinced I made the right choice picking the amd 7800xt. getting just under 60fps in cyberpunk 2077 1440p with ray tracing on ultra, and just over 60fps in spider-man miles morales 1440p with with ray tracing on ultra. I just hope 16gb of vram will be enough for tes6 in 2026-2027. paid $527 bought it from amd.
@@TacticalFlow I ordered mine 13 days ago. The wait actually became harder when they updated the ETA from unknown to 30/9 a few days ago. Weird how that works haha.
Maybe nvidia sponsored too. I have friends using 6700 xt, 7700 xt and 7800xt. They laugh at all the crashing, stuttering, excessive power draw, noise level crap that people keep complaining about Amd cards. 😂😂 Nvidia spends more money on marketing, so they need to overprice their garbage cards.
@@ishaanmurarka9082 yes but the stuttering alone with AMD cards though is a good reason not to own one, im not even a Nvidia fanboy I had a ARC 770 16gb as well but its too useless for gaming. AMD make good CPU's, my next CPU will be probably a AMD one.
This has aged so badly that it's embarrassing. This AI channel really shouldn't be doing tech videos. Whoever's behind it obviously has little idea what they're talking about. That's why this video has been ratioed at over 1k dislikes. These crappy AI channels, with bot subscribers too to make things even worse, should be banned. Everyone should report this video for misinformation and for essentially just being an Nvidia ad, spam in other words.
A lot of reviewers are actually making the mistake of arguing that the 7800 XT should have been a significant improvement in value over the 6800 XT's CURRENT and already heavily discounted price of around 500-530, and have completed ignored the fact that it's nothing new for previous gen cards to get heavily discounted even before a new generation card gets released. Many have also completely failed to mention that inflation has been SIGNIFICANTLY higher than normal since the 6000 series first released. It's good to be as critical as possible toward AMD and Nvidia's products, but any argument about the pricing should not rely on false claims or fallacious reasoning. The 6800 XT launched at 650 in 2020, which is equivalent to about 770 USD today, which is about what the 7900 XT currently goes for, and the 7900 XT has been available on discount for even lower than that in the US not too long ago. The 7800 XT is a 6700 XT successor. The 6700 XT launched at a (bloated) price of 480 USD because of the GPU shortage, which is equivalent to about 540 USD today. However, even if we assume that the 6700 XT was probably originally planned to launch at closer to 430 or even 400, 400 USD in early 2021 is equivalent to around 450 USD today, and the 7800 XT is about 43% faster, with 33% more Vram, better quality coolers on most models, and a variety of other improvements and new features, so that's still a significant improvement in value even over a low-ball estimate of what the 6700 XT was originally planned to launch at, and the 6700 XT would have been universally regarded as an excellent value if it had launched at 400, even if there had been no GPU shortage. The 5700 XT launched at 400 USD four years ago, with a somewhat lame blower style cooler on the reference model, and that's equivalent to about 480 USD today. That was widely regarded as an excellent value at the time, but the 7800 XT is around 90% faster, with double the vram, at only a slightly higher price. Significant progress in value per dollar is still happening. The rate of improvement is definitely slowing down, but I've seen a lot of very fallacious arguments about the 7800 XT not offering significant progress in value. Average incomes haven't kept pace with inflation, which sucks, but we can't really expect AMD to lower their prices to help us out with that, though they might have to sooner or later if sales are low enough, so stubbornly waiting for prices to drop further is always an option. For the 7700 XT, I would definitely recommend this strategy, because it should be ignored at 450 when the 7800 XT and 6800 XT are so close to it in price. AMD may well be slowly trying to increase their margins on their graphics cards, but that's not necessarily wrong. You can always vote with your wallet if you don't like a price.
Good points. I bought my RTX 3050 during the Mining crunch and felt lucky I could get it $100 more than MSRP. To which that was not the best card NVIDIA had. It was just what I could afford at the time. I had a RX 7800 XT on back order and could not get a shipping date and canceled it. I ended up getting a RX 7900 XT at that fallen price. I have the card but have not installed it yet to replace a RTX 3070. It is not the price that was wrong with the RX 7800 XT it sold better than I think they thought it would due to selling out. The naming was off. With all the testing it was a good price to performance no matter how you looked at it. I think if I would have gotten one I would have been happy with it. Do to supply I just took a step up to the RX 7900 XT at a great price.
Nah. Its much simpler than that. AMD themselves said the 7800 XT is a 6800 non XT replacement. Which is acceptable. But they went nutty and misnamed it as a 7800 xt. They mess up and did an Nvidia messing with the names. The 7800xt basically should have been the 7700xt. Whilst the 7900 GRE or XT be the 7800 XT. And then the 7900xtx as the 7900 XT. With their alloted pricing. NvIdia did the same shenanigans. 4060 ti should be the 4060 4070 should have been 4060 ti 4070 ti as the 4070 Then 4080 and 4090 staying as they are.
I do not really care about this issue due to I bought a RX 7900 XT for close to $800 out the door. Truthfully I do not see improvement over the RTX 3070 I was using in the game I focus on and play. FS 22. I am close to sending that back and getting either a RTX 4070 or RTX 4070 TI.
I agree with every sentence you said. But I do not think prices will decrease due to global and local inflation. I hesitantly ordered the new 7800xt, but I think this card will play every game at 2K resolution at ultra settings without any problems, and it will get even better with software improvements over time. The 4070 was a more expensive option and according to tests it fell behind the 7800xt OC+. I have used almost every series of AMD graphics cards before and I was not wrong in this decision, I hope I will not be wrong again.
They just jack up the price and create fake shortages in order to sell at a higher price, 16gb chips are cheaper than 2-3 years back and both NVIDIA and AMD want to create more profits, which will hurt their profits in the long run, if they don't drop the prices, more people are going to change their cards if the flagships are cheaper by 200-300$ which would make them more money.
@@ofon2000 Maybe I will not be able to sell it still will not install it. More than likely I may not even have the opportunity to do that anyway. Due the offer ends this month. I only play simulator games.
@@ardithconley2628 I'm with you though...last time I got my son a GPU (open box 7900 xt for 600 USD) I registered for the jedi survivor game, but it looked uninteresting for me so I didn't bother downloading it on release I'd do the same for starfield as you have 'cause the game just looks lame to me as well.
@@ofon2000 Good deal. My point it is not the game I care about it is the card and what what I want to do. It is another game I play a lot FS22. You got a great deal. I am happy for you. I know you will put it to good use.
Guys those say rx 7800xt draw more power than nvidia 4070/ti chill, thou 7800xt has 60-70w tdp more, u can undervolt limit it to 90% tdp consumption to 200+/-5 w and still have 9% more performance than 4070. If u want proof check techtesters channel they made dedicated video for rx 7800xt undervolting and also displayed samples of modern AAA at 1440p/1080p. Rx 7800xt is gud for long time and undervolt wont reduce the cards performance drastically
Rx7000 is designed for new AMD software you will want a 7000 series next yr even now they added hypr-rx mode which is insanely good. I usually don't like to brag about software because nvidia software sucks but amd managed to make this tech insanely good next yr it will work on thousands of directx 11 and 12 games all the technology they have been working on will run together all at once without issues like nvidia. Hypr-rx is available now and I have to say all my games run like butter
Firstly, this title makes absolutely no sense because you're praising the RX 7800 XT through most of the video. I personally will NOT be buying an RX 7800 XT but that's because I upgraded from my RX 6800 XT to my new RX 7900 XTX. Upgrading to an RX 7800 XT from an RX 6800 XT isn't an upgrade at all, it's just a waste of $500USD. When people ask me why I went from an RX 6800 XT to an RX 7900 XTX, I just point out that it's pretty much the same as someone upgrading from an RTX 3080 to an RTX 4080 but is a lot more financially sound.
I had a 7800XT sold it though and the stuttering in some games was absolute BS and was getting worse the more updated drivers AMD brought out, something I dont get with Nvidia cards, AMD Drivers are horrendous. will never touch another AMD card but their CPU's are decent.
@@tryfergoodra552 bro please stay away from it until AMD releases some stable drivers. 24.1.1 has made the 7800xt useless and most other AMD cards. I had to roll back drivers and still the card isn't performing as well as when I first got it.
Like Steve Burke from Gamers Nexus said, "AMD can not have it both ways". alluding to selling cards buy performance and not specks.. It is the bad naming schemes both AMD and NVIDIA are doing. The RX 7800 XT is really a RX 7800 non XT the real RX 7800 XT is the RX7900 GRE. according to specks. Naming makes anything we may think is just bazzaro world. However, the RX 7800 is a good card and good price. I am going to replace my RTX 3070 8gb card with RX 7800XT. I do think it will be a true upgrade for my gaming rig with that 16gb and its performance and new features. . I could go RTX 4070 But I think it is time for a change.
@@davidg2731 I am not throwing the RTX 3070 away just replacing it in my gaming rig. I will replace the RTX 3050 in my back up rig with that RTX 3070 due to that. That would be better all around. I have an editing rig with a RTX 4070 in it that I do not game on. So for me this combo will be a good all around upgrade. I can game and record and edit in AV1. Smaller files faster upload.
ray tracing isnt a point to pick a gpu for gaming !!! raw power is the point !!! ray trracing is a waste of time !!! not even the developers on games didnt making it good so the games running trush !!! for real waste off time
Mhm, sounds like you're talking about stock trading. Seeing this some time later I have to say that this aged like milk - the 7800 XT is and was by now the better deal. Even after the super launch when prices have settled this is the better card overall if you are not some kind of content creator that doesn't really game.
f AMD had named their cards correctly, this is what we'd be seeing: The RX 7900 XTX should be the RX 7800 XT because the rival of the RX 7900 XTX is the RTX 4080, the card that replaced the RTX 3080, the rival of the RX 6800 XT. AMD just CHOSE to call it the RX 7900 XTX to try and justify its pricing because they saw how nVidia went nuts with the RTX 4080 and thought "If we call it something really fancy, like the RX 7900 XTX, people will think it's something special and we can charge $1000 for it while still looking good compared to nVidia!" even though, functionally, the big RX 7900 XTX is just the real RX 7800 XT. We can move down the list from there: RX 7900 XT = RX 7700 XT, replacing the RX 6700 XT; just as the RTX 4070 Ti replaced the RTX 3070 Ti. RX 7900 GRE = RX 7700, replacing the RX 6700; just as the RTX 4070 replaced the RTX 3070. RX 7800 XT = RX 7600 XT, replacing the RX 6600 XT; just as the RTX 4060 Ti replaced the RTX 3060 Ti. RX 7700 XT = RX 7600, replacing the RX 6600; just as the RTX 4060 replaced the RTX 3060. RX 7600 = RX 7500 replacing the RX 6500 XT; nVidia has no replacement for the RTX 3050. This "RX 6800 XT" and "RX 7700 XT" are really just level-6 cards which is why they barely beat the level-8 card of the previous generation. The one good thing that AMD did was give the Radeons more VRAM than the cards they replaced. I'll explain: The RX 7900 XTX replaces the RX 6800 XT so it's a 50% increase in VRAM (16-24) The RX 7900 XT replaces the RX 7700 XT so it's a 67% increase in VRAM (12-20) The RX 7900 GRE replaces the RX 7700 so it's a 60% increase in VRAM (10-16) The RX 7800 XT replaces the RX 6600 XT so it's a 100% increase in VRAM (8-16) The RX 7700 XT replaces the RX 6600 so it's it's a 50% increase in VRAM (8-12) The RX 7600 replaces the RX 6500 XT so it's a 100% increase in VRAM (4-8) AMD tried to obfuscate and justify their price gouging with some BS naming scheme, copying Nvidia, as if they have the mind and market share like Team Green!
They say 4070 is better for productivity and streaming and features, but the 7800 xt is a good choice as well and has its own features, just the 4070 is little better outside gaming, however if you want the card to have your back for 2 years or more, you may wanna get the 7800 xt because you may need 16gb vram after a year or two
@@firas.jn571 16GB VRAM is more important in the near future and this guy has no reason for saying nVidia is better outside of gaming. Like at all. LOL
@@gb342002exactly. When I ask someone how is nvidia better than Amd outside gaming? Well, that's what everyone says. Just a false hype created by nvidia. Nobody has any facts, they simply say such things to make you consider the overpriced nvidia cards. Or else they aren't even worth considering
Without a doubt you should go with 7800XT, there's a almost 15 avrg fps increase in 1440p and only 50$ price difference, so save a little bit more to get those extra good frames! 16GB VRAM will surely help you out with 1440p for future proofed gameplay experience
@@be4tr1xthekiddo82 my comment is sarcastic to the person that made this video and say why you SHOULDN'T buy the 7800xt, but anyway. the mistake that people make is that they don't realize that when you have an 6800xt or an rtx 3080 there's no need to get the 7800xt or the rtx 4080. the new gpu's are mostly for people like me that have gpu older than 1 generation. me that i have an rx 5700 the 7800xt is an obvious upgrade so i should buy it. price to performance of 7700xt vs 7800xt is not justified. neither is the performance of 4060 ti 16gb for the price. rtx 3080 in EU is €800ish minimum and it's Zotac. if you want something better the price goes up to above €1,000. if you want a red devil 7800xt that's €710ish = $760 so of course it's expensive. 6800xt is like €40 cheaper than 7800xt and 6800xt won't have the anti-lag+ to lower the input lag to counter the increase of input lag with the frame generation. also, 7800xt draws less power than 6800xt so electricity bill will be lower than if you have 6800xt. there will be a discount soon on black Friday so i'll get the 7800xt.
4090 is worse, costs over 3000 new in my country New Zealand, who da fack gonna spend that sorta money on gfx card that will be mediocre in some years.
The aftermarket will be $599 at least. Simply because the 6800xt's are almost gone. The 7800xt draws the line for cheaper CPU's. Like has been shown 7900xt, 7900xtx and a 3080 or better will get bottlenecked by anything less than a 12700k. Pick your poison wisely. Especially anything on DDR4.
@@junitoalmodovar1542 Your main restriction is DDR4, but if you think about it like this; a 13700K has 8 LGA1700 P cores and 8 amd 2600x equivalent Ecores inside the same chip. So just comparing to that, you have 8 14nm cores 16 threads. You will want to have a monitor that keeps the GPU working, but not a monitor that needs a 4090 to play any game. Just for reference, Gamers nexus has shown that the 12700K bottlenecks most high end cards at 1440p even. Depends upon the game obviously, but the difference is processor speed in some games, but in others it just takes brute force. DDR5 being 6000mhz sweet spot vs 3600 DDR4 gaining an advantage as well. Now the price is only $50 difference. I ditched the 9900KF for a 13700K a couple weeks after its release. At that time my DDR4 choice was obvious, today it is way better to spend $100 more on the system and go DDR5. You will be ok, but you will want better after you install the 7800xt. Back to the topic of bottlenecking; the 12700K was bottlenecking a 7900xt.
A year ago all the tech channels were shooting their mouths off saying that the 7700XT would be faster than the 6900XT at only c.$450. If it were true, I would have bought it.
Using DLSS and FSR for making decisions is bad imo and should mainly be a bonus to RAW performance.
Why is the voice AI generated? Why not just use your own voice... this video is lame
because he's an nVidia fan boy. They are all manlets
When you start a video by saying "Today we're diving into the radeon rx 7800 xt today" I don't have high expectations.
Hahahahah
The inconsistencies in the way "he" said 7800 was another turn off, too. It still amazes me that in 2024 we are still using computer generated voices for tech review videos. Lol!
NVIDIA sponsored video asking you to buy RTX4070TI.
Truth hurts right?? 🤣🤣🤣
The power consumption is not 100 W more than the 4700. It's around 50W. AMD display the card consumtion and not the GPU as previuos AMD or current nvidia GPU. Some reviewers have done test with mesures on the complete ¨PC consumption.
*4070
I was worried I'd have to buy a new PSU going from a Ryzen 3600 + 5700 XT to a Ryzen 7600x + 7800 XT. Nope. 360W-430W while gaming. 480W max load. Nvidia fans have people believing the new card is like Electro, gulping up power... not so.
okay now im 100% convinced I made the right choice picking the amd 7800xt. getting just under 60fps in cyberpunk 2077 1440p with ray tracing on ultra, and just over 60fps in spider-man miles morales 1440p with with ray tracing on ultra. I just hope 16gb of vram will be enough for tes6 in 2026-2027. paid $527 bought it from amd.
How is the noise? Still debating on getting it from AMD or one of the AIB companies.
Also what CPU did you pair it with? Thanks
@@TacticalFlow Take a look at the Powercolor hellhound. Getting praise for low noise.
@LarsJ1977 thanks, been keeping an eye out. But everything sells out lol.. all good, don't mind waiting
@@TacticalFlow I ordered mine 13 days ago. The wait actually became harder when they updated the ETA from unknown to 30/9 a few days ago. Weird how that works haha.
got a rx7600 a few weeks ago, GREAT UPGRADE from my 1050ti
You got me excited to buy it because also I have 1050ti
That's a huge upgrade! I know you felt the performance increase 😊
Damn that’s quite a jump in performance… nice job man
Nvidia Fanboy?
Truth hurts AMD fanboy?? 🤣🤣🤣
Maybe nvidia sponsored too. I have friends using 6700 xt, 7700 xt and 7800xt. They laugh at all the crashing, stuttering, excessive power draw, noise level crap that people keep complaining about Amd cards. 😂😂 Nvidia spends more money on marketing, so they need to overprice their garbage cards.
@@ishaanmurarka9082 yes but the stuttering alone with AMD cards though is a good reason not to own one, im not even a Nvidia fanboy I had a ARC 770 16gb as well but its too useless for gaming. AMD make good CPU's, my next CPU will be probably a AMD one.
This has aged so badly that it's embarrassing. This AI channel really shouldn't be doing tech videos. Whoever's behind it obviously has little idea what they're talking about. That's why this video has been ratioed at over 1k dislikes. These crappy AI channels, with bot subscribers too to make things even worse, should be banned. Everyone should report this video for misinformation and for essentially just being an Nvidia ad, spam in other words.
A lot of reviewers are actually making the mistake of arguing that the 7800 XT should have been a significant improvement in value over the 6800 XT's CURRENT and already heavily discounted price of around 500-530, and have completed ignored the fact that it's nothing new for previous gen cards to get heavily discounted even before a new generation card gets released. Many have also completely failed to mention that inflation has been SIGNIFICANTLY higher than normal since the 6000 series first released. It's good to be as critical as possible toward AMD and Nvidia's products, but any argument about the pricing should not rely on false claims or fallacious reasoning.
The 6800 XT launched at 650 in 2020, which is equivalent to about 770 USD today, which is about what the 7900 XT currently goes for, and the 7900 XT has been available on discount for even lower than that in the US not too long ago.
The 7800 XT is a 6700 XT successor. The 6700 XT launched at a (bloated) price of 480 USD because of the GPU shortage, which is equivalent to about 540 USD today. However, even if we assume that the 6700 XT was probably originally planned to launch at closer to 430 or even 400, 400 USD in early 2021 is equivalent to around 450 USD today, and the 7800 XT is about 43% faster, with 33% more Vram, better quality coolers on most models, and a variety of other improvements and new features, so that's still a significant improvement in value even over a low-ball estimate of what the 6700 XT was originally planned to launch at, and the 6700 XT would have been universally regarded as an excellent value if it had launched at 400, even if there had been no GPU shortage.
The 5700 XT launched at 400 USD four years ago, with a somewhat lame blower style cooler on the reference model, and that's equivalent to about 480 USD today. That was widely regarded as an excellent value at the time, but the 7800 XT is around 90% faster, with double the vram, at only a slightly higher price. Significant progress in value per dollar is still happening. The rate of improvement is definitely slowing down, but I've seen a lot of very fallacious arguments about the 7800 XT not offering significant progress in value.
Average incomes haven't kept pace with inflation, which sucks, but we can't really expect AMD to lower their prices to help us out with that, though they might have to sooner or later if sales are low enough, so stubbornly waiting for prices to drop further is always an option. For the 7700 XT, I would definitely recommend this strategy, because it should be ignored at 450 when the 7800 XT and 6800 XT are so close to it in price.
AMD may well be slowly trying to increase their margins on their graphics cards, but that's not necessarily wrong. You can always vote with your wallet if you don't like a price.
Good points. I bought my RTX 3050 during the Mining crunch and felt lucky I could get it $100 more than MSRP. To which that was not the best card NVIDIA had. It was just what I could afford at the time. I had a RX 7800 XT on back order and could not get a shipping date and canceled it. I ended up getting a RX 7900 XT at that fallen price. I have the card but have not installed it yet to replace a RTX 3070. It is not the price that was wrong with the RX 7800 XT it sold better than I think they thought it would due to selling out. The naming was off. With all the testing it was a good price to performance no matter how you looked at it. I think if I would have gotten one I would have been happy with it. Do to supply I just took a step up to the RX 7900 XT at a great price.
Nah. Its much simpler than that.
AMD themselves said the 7800 XT is a 6800 non XT replacement. Which is acceptable.
But they went nutty and misnamed it as a 7800 xt.
They mess up and did an Nvidia messing with the names.
The 7800xt basically should have been the 7700xt.
Whilst the 7900 GRE or XT be the 7800 XT.
And then the 7900xtx as the 7900 XT.
With their alloted pricing.
NvIdia did the same shenanigans.
4060 ti should be the 4060
4070 should have been 4060 ti
4070 ti as the 4070
Then 4080 and 4090 staying as they are.
I do not really care about this issue due to I bought a RX 7900 XT for close to $800 out the door. Truthfully I do not see improvement over the RTX 3070 I was using in the game I focus on and play. FS 22. I am close to sending that back and getting either a RTX 4070 or RTX 4070 TI.
I agree with every sentence you said. But I do not think prices will decrease due to global and local inflation. I hesitantly ordered the new 7800xt, but I think this card will play every game at 2K resolution at ultra settings without any problems, and it will get even better with software improvements over time. The 4070 was a more expensive option and according to tests it fell behind the 7800xt OC+. I have used almost every series of AMD graphics cards before and I was not wrong in this decision, I hope I will not be wrong again.
They just jack up the price and create fake shortages in order to sell at a higher price, 16gb chips are cheaper than 2-3 years back and both NVIDIA and AMD want to create more profits, which will hurt their profits in the long run, if they don't drop the prices, more people are going to change their cards if the flagships are cheaper by 200-300$ which would make them more money.
It's the "this new military flashlight is taking the internet by storm" guy 😂 UA-cam ad voice
I'm still buying Asrock Rx 7800 xt 🙃
When I buy that RX 7800 XT I am going to sell that Star Field game. I am never going to play a game like that.
It can only be installed on the computer with this gpu in it
@@ofon2000 Maybe I will not be able to sell it still will not install it. More than likely I may not even have the opportunity to do that anyway. Due the offer ends this month. I only play simulator games.
@@ardithconley2628 I'm with you though...last time I got my son a GPU (open box 7900 xt for 600 USD) I registered for the jedi survivor game, but it looked uninteresting for me so I didn't bother downloading it on release
I'd do the same for starfield as you have 'cause the game just looks lame to me as well.
@@ofon2000 Good deal. My point it is not the game I care about it is the card and what what I want to do. It is another game I play a lot FS22. You got a great deal. I am happy for you. I know you will put it to good use.
Its tied to the AMD hardware. There is an app you download to register the game with your gpu.
Guys those say rx 7800xt draw more power than nvidia 4070/ti chill, thou 7800xt has 60-70w tdp more, u can undervolt limit it to 90% tdp consumption to 200+/-5 w and still have 9% more performance than 4070. If u want proof check techtesters channel they made dedicated video for rx 7800xt undervolting and also displayed samples of modern AAA at 1440p/1080p. Rx 7800xt is gud for long time and undervolt wont reduce the cards performance drastically
I have trouble being convinced by an AI voice that uses stock footage instead of actually buying it and testing it.
This aged like milk in the desert.
Already have a RX 6800. Not sure I will buy into this gen.
No point in upgrading unless going for 7900 or top end nvidia. Best to wait for next gen atleast.
Rx7000 is designed for new AMD software you will want a 7000 series next yr even now they added hypr-rx mode which is insanely good. I usually don't like to brag about software because nvidia software sucks but amd managed to make this tech insanely good next yr it will work on thousands of directx 11 and 12 games all the technology they have been working on will run together all at once without issues like nvidia. Hypr-rx is available now and I have to say all my games run like butter
Makes a difference from a 6800 but if you have a 6800XT then do not bother.
Yeah save ur money it’s the same card with a few more bells n whistles. Raw performance is essentially the same
Firstly, this title makes absolutely no sense because you're praising the RX 7800 XT through most of the video. I personally will NOT be buying an RX 7800 XT but that's because I upgraded from my RX 6800 XT to my new RX 7900 XTX. Upgrading to an RX 7800 XT from an RX 6800 XT isn't an upgrade at all, it's just a waste of $500USD.
When people ask me why I went from an RX 6800 XT to an RX 7900 XTX, I just point out that it's pretty much the same as someone upgrading from an RTX 3080 to an RTX 4080 but is a lot more financially sound.
but if you are using an very old gpu or you don't have a gpu and want to buy one on 500 dollar budget you can consider rx 7800xt
got an rx 6800xt a few months ago , good upgrade from my gtx 1080ti
I had a 7800XT sold it though and the stuttering in some games was absolute BS and was getting worse the more updated drivers AMD brought out, something I dont get with Nvidia cards, AMD Drivers are horrendous. will never touch another AMD card but their CPU's are decent.
You can simply undervolt it in the driver software its not that big of an issue. Bad advice for people looking for P2P value
yhea, but 7800xt is like 50% of 7900xtx and its like 17fps 1% low lower, while average fps is like 30 fps lower
I got around 60 fps Ultra Ray Tracing but around 100 FPS on Normal Ultra settings, Cyberpunk XFX Rx 7800xt..
Yeah raytracing isnt worth it
you claimed the wrong amount of compute units its 60 not 80
Nvidia fanboy detected, lmao you don’t really know anything about gpus my friend
This sounds like an ai voice bot cant barely aay pricing 10 dollars it said and cant say today twice in same sentence
I got a Powercolor Hellhound and i cant hear the fan at all. It does pretty much everything you need.
Does it have any coil whine at any time? that concerns me and hows stability , crashes?
@@tryfergoodra552 bro please stay away from it until AMD releases some stable drivers. 24.1.1 has made the 7800xt useless and most other AMD cards. I had to roll back drivers and still the card isn't performing as well as when I first got it.
This is a nvidia sponsored video. Everything is exaggerated or out right false to make nvidia look good.
@@tryfergoodra552mine has some coil whine but it’s mostly drowned out my my AIO’s fans
Like Steve Burke from Gamers Nexus said, "AMD can not have it both ways". alluding to selling cards buy performance and not specks.. It is the bad naming schemes both AMD and NVIDIA are doing. The RX 7800 XT is really a RX 7800 non XT the real RX 7800 XT is the RX7900 GRE. according to specks. Naming makes anything we may think is just bazzaro world. However, the RX 7800 is a good card and good price. I am going to replace my RTX 3070 8gb card with RX 7800XT. I do think it will be a true upgrade for my gaming rig with that 16gb and its performance and new features. . I could go RTX 4070 But I think it is time for a change.
The RX 7800XT is a modern 3080 with more VRAM and lower power use, although you lose productivity cuda apps.
@@davidg2731 I am not throwing the RTX 3070 away just replacing it in my gaming rig. I will replace the RTX 3050 in my back up rig with that RTX 3070 due to that. That would be better all around. I have an editing rig with a RTX 4070 in it that I do not game on. So for me this combo will be a good all around upgrade. I can game and record and edit in AV1. Smaller files faster upload.
Ok NVIDIA shill, relax.
Both brands are good and bad. Nvidia has garbage prices, amd has garbage drivers.
I will go for garbage price allday everyday.. I don't want to be stressed by fixing some garbage drivers.. 🤣🤣🤣
typical ghost channel paid by nvidia :D so funny
ray tracing isnt a point to pick a gpu for gaming !!! raw power is the point !!! ray trracing is a waste of time !!! not even the developers on games didnt making it good so the games running trush !!! for real waste off time
I disagree I have a 4070 Super and play Diablo 4 quite a bit, with RT on the game looks way better than with it turned off.
These AI voices irks me so hard.
Love that they day boo’d those jagga bits
show your face dum dum
Mhm, sounds like you're talking about stock trading. Seeing this some time later I have to say that this aged like milk - the 7800 XT is and was by now the better deal. Even after the super launch when prices have settled this is the better card overall if you are not some kind of content creator that doesn't really game.
Welp just bought it anyways
LOL this is literally the worst take I've seen in a while - AND downright made up numbers. GG on your 1/10 ratio video!
its not the follow up to the 6800xt but to the 6800 non xt
bro does not have a clue aout what he is talking about!?!
Where can i get one of these cards Please..... MY PC NEEDS IT... AMD Ryzen 9 to hold its hand
Watching this video was a complete waste of my time
Yes because truth hurts AMD fanboy?! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
It’s actually the 7900 vs the 6800 and the 7800 vs 6700 because of the die. Both 7800 and 6700 use the smaller die
major nvidia glazer
"day boo"
L content
f AMD had named their cards correctly, this is what we'd be seeing:
The RX 7900 XTX should be the RX 7800 XT because the rival of the RX 7900 XTX is the RTX 4080, the card that replaced the RTX 3080, the rival of the RX 6800 XT. AMD just CHOSE to call it the RX 7900 XTX to try and justify its pricing because they saw how nVidia went nuts with the RTX 4080 and thought "If we call it something really fancy, like the RX 7900 XTX, people will think it's something special and we can charge $1000 for it while still looking good compared to nVidia!" even though, functionally, the big RX 7900 XTX is just the real RX 7800 XT.
We can move down the list from there:
RX 7900 XT = RX 7700 XT, replacing the RX 6700 XT; just as the RTX 4070 Ti replaced the RTX 3070 Ti.
RX 7900 GRE = RX 7700, replacing the RX 6700; just as the RTX 4070 replaced the RTX 3070.
RX 7800 XT = RX 7600 XT, replacing the RX 6600 XT; just as the RTX 4060 Ti replaced the RTX 3060 Ti.
RX 7700 XT = RX 7600, replacing the RX 6600; just as the RTX 4060 replaced the RTX 3060.
RX 7600 = RX 7500 replacing the RX 6500 XT; nVidia has no replacement for the RTX 3050.
This "RX 6800 XT" and "RX 7700 XT" are really just level-6 cards which is why they barely beat the level-8 card of the previous generation. The one good thing that AMD did was give the Radeons more VRAM than the cards they replaced. I'll explain:
The RX 7900 XTX replaces the RX 6800 XT so it's a 50% increase in VRAM (16-24)
The RX 7900 XT replaces the RX 7700 XT so it's a 67% increase in VRAM (12-20)
The RX 7900 GRE replaces the RX 7700 so it's a 60% increase in VRAM (10-16)
The RX 7800 XT replaces the RX 6600 XT so it's a 100% increase in VRAM (8-16)
The RX 7700 XT replaces the RX 6600 so it's it's a 50% increase in VRAM (8-12)
The RX 7600 replaces the RX 6500 XT so it's a 100% increase in VRAM (4-8)
AMD tried to obfuscate and justify their price gouging with some BS naming scheme, copying Nvidia, as if they have the mind and market share like Team Green!
for productivity purpose which one is better 7800 xt or 4070 ? 😮
They say 4070 is better for productivity and streaming and features, but the 7800 xt is a good choice as well and has its own features, just the 4070 is little better outside gaming, however if you want the card to have your back for 2 years or more, you may wanna get the 7800 xt because you may need 16gb vram after a year or two
@@firas.jn571 16GB VRAM is more important in the near future and this guy has no reason for saying nVidia is better outside of gaming. Like at all. LOL
@@gb342002exactly. When I ask someone how is nvidia better than Amd outside gaming? Well, that's what everyone says. Just a false hype created by nvidia. Nobody has any facts, they simply say such things to make you consider the overpriced nvidia cards. Or else they aren't even worth considering
i bought one and it sucks!!!!
Yes AMD drivers is sucks 🤮
and what should i buy to replace my 5700 and go up to 1440p resolution?
I did that. Yes it's worth
Without a doubt you should go with 7800XT, there's a almost 15 avrg fps increase in 1440p and only 50$ price difference, so save a little bit more to get those extra good frames! 16GB VRAM will surely help you out with 1440p for future proofed gameplay experience
7700xt and 4060 TI (16GB) both are enough however i would go with 7800XT, but if they r expensive for you u can get a 3080 or 6800XT at lower prices
@@be4tr1xthekiddo82 my comment is sarcastic to the person that made this video and say why you SHOULDN'T buy the 7800xt, but anyway. the mistake that people make is that they don't realize that when you have an 6800xt or an rtx 3080 there's no need to get the 7800xt or the rtx 4080. the new gpu's are mostly for people like me that have gpu older than 1 generation. me that i have an rx 5700 the 7800xt is an obvious upgrade so i should buy it.
price to performance of 7700xt vs 7800xt is not justified. neither is the performance of 4060 ti 16gb for the price.
rtx 3080 in EU is €800ish minimum and it's Zotac. if you want something better the price goes up to above €1,000.
if you want a red devil 7800xt that's €710ish = $760 so of course it's expensive.
6800xt is like €40 cheaper than 7800xt and 6800xt won't have the anti-lag+ to lower the input lag to counter the increase of input lag with the frame generation. also, 7800xt draws less power than 6800xt so electricity bill will be lower than if you have 6800xt.
there will be a discount soon on black Friday so i'll get the 7800xt.
This card bro. Don't listen to this channel
Is the 7800xt and 5600 overkill for 1080p 165hz? Is it money wasted?
Yes. Way overkill for 1080p. 7600xt is more than sufficient for 1080p
Absolutely overpowered for 1080p. This card is most comfortable in 1440
nvidia is overrated i have a rtx 4080 and never will buy such a pricy card ever again
4090 is worse, costs over 3000 new in my country New Zealand, who da fack gonna spend that sorta money on gfx card that will be mediocre in some years.
I buy the referenz card from AMD!!!
WTF is a jygabit? LOL
Do you think this graphics card requires a GPU support bracket? Is the card heavy?
i dont have any support bracket and it handle just fine, no sagging at all.
It depends on the individual model.
The aftermarket will be $599 at least. Simply because the 6800xt's are almost gone.
The 7800xt draws the line for cheaper CPU's. Like has been shown 7900xt, 7900xtx and a 3080 or better will get bottlenecked by anything less than a 12700k. Pick your poison wisely. Especially anything on DDR4.
It's not tho lol
You trolls are funny
@@robertstan298 And that's all you had to say about that.
Nothing but Crickets in your mind....
I have an 11700k. Will this be good with hellhound 7800xt?
@@junitoalmodovar1542 Your main restriction is DDR4, but if you think about it like this; a 13700K has 8 LGA1700 P cores and 8 amd 2600x equivalent Ecores inside the same chip.
So just comparing to that, you have 8 14nm cores 16 threads.
You will want to have a monitor that keeps the GPU working, but not a monitor that needs a 4090 to play any game.
Just for reference, Gamers nexus has shown that the 12700K bottlenecks most high end cards at 1440p even.
Depends upon the game obviously, but the difference is processor speed in some games, but in others it just takes brute force.
DDR5 being 6000mhz sweet spot vs 3600 DDR4 gaining an advantage as well. Now the price is only $50 difference.
I ditched the 9900KF for a 13700K a couple weeks after its release. At that time my DDR4 choice was obvious, today it is way better to spend $100 more on the system and go DDR5.
You will be ok, but you will want better after you install the 7800xt. Back to the topic of bottlenecking; the 12700K was bottlenecking a 7900xt.
A year ago all the tech channels were shooting their mouths off saying that the 7700XT would be faster than the 6900XT at only c.$450. If it were true, I would have bought it.
i understand so always buy nvidia.
You should never blindly trust any brand, no matter how good their past track record might be, and Nvidia's track record is far from perfect.
@@syncmonismI will go with a bad price than bad drivers 🤣🤣🤣