I know nothing about rockets and the video is great, but something is missing. The capsule twisted rapidly, i think. It's something i don't see in the video, besides that, great simulation.
@@phillip_iv_planetking6354 yes lets call the people who put the first satellite (sputnik), animal (laika), man (Yuri Gagarin), woman (Valentina Tereshkova), spacewalker (Alexei Leonov), the first country to put a probe on the moon, and the only country currently capable of manned spaceflight to the space station (china is banned from visiting so their space craft can't dock to it) the "sore loser" cause last time I checked America and china have always come in second behind the Russians in space (except for that whole Apollo thing)
@@ThePrimalEarth Really? Everything after Apollo was an American achievement. We dominate in low Earth Orbit. From Hubble to the damn rovers still operating on Mars to this day. We had a fleet of shuttles not one like Russia's Buran which was cancelled. And today our damn private Space companies are running circles around Russia's private and state space programs. You do know that the Soyuz is being replaced? After that Russia will fall out of Space news and tech completely. The only reason they are relevant is because we grounded our shuttle fleet. Other than being a ride they offer nothing. Yes the "Soviet Union" did wonderful things in Space but Russia not so much.
Early on, Russian officials have said that they were studying the footage from the rocket cameras. Whether it is true, who knows. People who work there say that they did not have the live video stream from the rocket, but there might have been cameras similar to GoPro, recording the video on board. The first stages usually survive the fall in relatively good shape, and their remains are always recovered. So it would not be very hard to add such cameras with very high chances for them to survive the flight. There are also ground based optical tracking stations along the flight path, though the footage from them had never been made public.
@@FutureMartian97 Soyuz MS-10 is the first crewed mission to get the new Astra avionics unit, new sensors, guidance computer upgrades (to handle significantly more data), and a significant telemetry bandwidth upgrade - allowing it to have several engineering camera streams. It's been tested a few times before on Progress missions before to ensure it was functional. Basically, if MS-09 or any previous Soyuz failed, you'd be right - but they just completed an upgrade and their first mission was a failure. They're very lucky they installed the new system.
They have the ground impact location coordinates for all the components. I've seen three pictures, since taken down from a Russian technical forum, of a Blok A on the ground. The caption had "MS-10" on one of the pictures. Two different Roscosmos officials have mentioned onboard video. I'm of the opinion they have sufficient data on the cause. Preventing it from happening again is the issue. On NASASpaceflight forum, information was posted on 3 earlier,1960's-1980's, flight failures due to the collision of first and second stage components. Video would show if the Blok D struts released with the ball joint binding causing the Blok D to swing back into the Blok A before the ball joint released or the delay or failure in the oxygen port pyro firing caused the Blok D to slide down the Blok A impacting near the Blok A propulsion section as depicted in the animation.
I had no idea that the Soyuz had a second emergency escape system in the shroud. That's really amazing and incredible foresight by the engineers back in the 80s. This accident happened seconds after the LES had been jettisoned too. When the shroud boosters failed and then the shroud fell away, I assume the entire Soyuz spacecraft (instrument, rentry and habitat) modules were still attached so had to be immediately detached?
The Saturn V and Apollo spacecraft actually had two launch escape systems as well. The Launch Escape Tower (LET) on top of the Command Module would pull the crew cabin off the stack up until the burn out of the 1st stage, after which the LET was jettisoned. Then while on the 2nd and 3rd stages the Command and Service Modules, which were still connected together, would separate from the rocket and the SPS engine on the Service Module would fire to push the CSM safely away from the malfunctioning booster. Eventually the Service Module was jettisoned and the Command Module by itself would parachute into the ocean.
This was deigned long before 1980s. Korolev had a hard rule that a manned rocket had to be able to save people at any stage of its flight, including launch.
No one, ever, was killed via soyuz. Period. And it's like almost half a century old and still in service. That's a lower casualty rate than passinger aircraft. That is how reliable a soyuz is.
Bloody fantastic job with the recreation. The angles, the timing, it all very much helps get a much clearer view of the failure step by step as it happened. To think only a handful of weeks ago we hardly understood the issue, now we have reach the point of such accurate simulations, with the problem already being corrected. How the progress of science marches on!!
Some of the finer details of the timeline of this accident have eluded me... Until now. Thank you for shining some clarity on this for me AND for bringing us all of these excellent renderings!
Never came across your channel before. I am amazed by the quality of your work. This gives me the exact vision I was trying to picture in my head of what happened when Scott Manley was explaining it and showing those grainy videos. Thank you So Much for this. Consider me Subscribed.
For anyone who wants an explanation of what they're seeing, here's the quick version. The clearest view of all of the events is at 1:25. The view that's closest to the actual onboard footage we've seen is at 0:58. The first stage of a Soyuz rocket detaches in four steps. The launchpad abort rockets eject from the top of the rocket. Think of it as an ejector seat for the entire crew capsule. This is removed to save weight, as the rocket is high enough to not need it. Second, the bottom clamps on the boosters release. The booster motors keep running for a moment after this to hinge each booster upwards on the joint at their tops. Third, the joint at the top of each booster releases when the body of the boosters have hinged up far enough to not slam back into the rocket during step 4. Last, small vents near the top of the boosters push them away from the center of the rocket. They spin safely away while the second stage is started. The failure was in step 3. The Russian space agency tracked down the wreckage from the booster which didn't separate. They believe that the bolt in the center of the joint was bent during assembly. This would have caused the sensor to never reach the angle where it is programmed to send a signal to systems that automatically release the upper joint. Because of this, the booster either hinged back down into the rocket or tore the entire joint off. Possibly both. Sensors linked to the systems that monitor which direction the rocket is facing detected that the ship could not be brought back under control and automatically ejected the crew capsule from the lower stages. Props to Scott Manley, whose explanation is what I'm basing this on. Go check out his channel. He's smarter than I am.
9 o clock booster remained hinged and tore the skin of the core bursting it's fuel tanks in trying to peel away awesome animation can shed light on this incident
It didn't remain hinged (the only hinges are at the bottom of the booster), but it failed to turn the nose away from the core stage, which is why the damage occured.
How did you manage ti be so accurate to the point that this was posted before the video was even published? and heck knowing you needed time to make this was even more impressive
Your videos are top quality you deserve much more subs and views! As for the failure, to me it shows how good the rocket is. They have had a failure on the pad and in flight and crew have survived.
Wow, you made this before the actual video of the onboard view came out and it looks so similar. You do really deserve more subscribers then you have right now. Hope some guys notice your talent.
with the exception of the MS-10 mission, every single soyuz mission since 1986 was a success. thinking of how the soyuz family is just a heavily modernized and upgraded R-7 design, it's impressive that these things works as damn well as they do.
Bloody excellent!!! You filled in the gap of the real video - and that's exactly what I thought it would look like - if ya know what I mean. Gee you are good at this...
Very interesting. Shows what most likely happend with Soyus MS-10. And you were really quick, too. One question out of curiosity: Is what we're seeing here the exact same animation from different perspectives or did you animate this more than once for visual reasons?
What triggered the in-flight abort system? Your animation shows the Soyuz being pulled away by escape tower motors (or was it those in the capsule shroud?) before the (failed) booster separation.
The escape tower is jettisoned about 5 seconds before booster separation, the tower is only needed when the boosters are attached, the shroud can handle aborts once the boosters separate
Side booster ball joint: I'm gonna do what's called a pro gamer move.
As a gamer move, I would have called that a "Leeeeroy Jeeeennnkins!"
Didn't expect to see you here
Lol u are funny
Thanks a lot side booster ball joint!! 😡
@@LSF17 Np Lol
Roscosmos has just released the onboard video of the accident, this simulation is surprisingly accurate!
Scarily accurate. Even fills in a few frame gaps from the onboard cameras. Really impressive work +Hazegrayart
Yeah, I saw this animation only now and thought it was modelled after the video. Then I saw the release date.
I know nothing about rockets and the video is great, but something is missing. The capsule twisted rapidly, i think. It's something i don't see in the video, besides that, great simulation.
@@diezgp that wouldve been when the spacecraft was carried away from the rocket by the shroud
@@klobiforpresident2254 me too, dude. So accurate
Dude, this is awesome. I wish I could hire you
Oui ce serait trop cool
Effectivement mon cher Vincent
Hire him!
Cool
@@andre.s2002 Why are you french
Yet another awesome rocket animation
There are real footage of the incident.
@@brunobastos5533 - Yeah 'real' hollywood' footage.
@@imaginarypoint nota this ones but today they releasse real images
ua-cam.com/video/exxDmBbGaTQ/v-deo.html the real deal
@@brunobastos5533 - If they "say so" ;)
Thank russian engineering they survived. Korolev deserves far more recognition.
It's a pretty damn sturdy and safe spacecraft yeah
@@starshot5172 if built correctly of course
Given how secretive Russia is about their failures I would not recognize anyone.
Russia is a sore loser.
@@phillip_iv_planetking6354 yes lets call the people who put the first satellite (sputnik), animal (laika), man (Yuri Gagarin), woman (Valentina Tereshkova), spacewalker (Alexei Leonov), the first country to put a probe on the moon, and the only country currently capable of manned spaceflight to the space station (china is banned from visiting so their space craft can't dock to it) the "sore loser" cause last time I checked America and china have always come in second behind the Russians in space (except for that whole Apollo thing)
@@ThePrimalEarth Really?
Everything after Apollo was an American achievement.
We dominate in low Earth Orbit.
From Hubble to the damn rovers still operating on Mars to this day.
We had a fleet of shuttles not one like Russia's Buran which was cancelled.
And today our damn private Space companies are running circles around Russia's private and state space programs.
You do know that the Soyuz is being replaced?
After that Russia will fall out of Space news and tech completely.
The only reason they are relevant is because we grounded our shuttle fleet.
Other than being a ride they offer nothing.
Yes the "Soviet Union" did wonderful things in Space but Russia not so much.
This is as close as we'll get until Roscosmos releases the side videos.
Good luck with that.
We do not even know the eaxact number of deaths or failures from Russia given their nature of lying.
Soyuz doesn’t have external cameras. Only on special occasions
Early on, Russian officials have said that they were studying the footage from the rocket cameras. Whether it is true, who knows. People who work there say that they did not have the live video stream from the rocket, but there might have been cameras similar to GoPro, recording the video on board. The first stages usually survive the fall in relatively good shape, and their remains are always recovered. So it would not be very hard to add such cameras with very high chances for them to survive the flight.
There are also ground based optical tracking stations along the flight path, though the footage from them had never been made public.
@@FutureMartian97 Soyuz MS-10 is the first crewed mission to get the new Astra avionics unit, new sensors, guidance computer upgrades (to handle significantly more data), and a significant telemetry bandwidth upgrade - allowing it to have several engineering camera streams. It's been tested a few times before on Progress missions before to ensure it was functional. Basically, if MS-09 or any previous Soyuz failed, you'd be right - but they just completed an upgrade and their first mission was a failure. They're very lucky they installed the new system.
They have the ground impact location coordinates for all the components. I've seen three pictures, since taken down from a Russian technical forum, of a Blok A on the ground. The caption had "MS-10" on one of the pictures. Two different Roscosmos officials have mentioned onboard video. I'm of the opinion they have sufficient data on the cause. Preventing it from happening again is the issue. On NASASpaceflight forum, information was posted on 3 earlier,1960's-1980's, flight failures due to the collision of first and second stage components. Video would show if the Blok D struts released with the ball joint binding causing the Blok D to swing back into the Blok A before the ball joint released or the delay or failure in the oxygen port pyro firing caused the Blok D to slide down the Blok A impacting near the Blok A propulsion section as depicted in the animation.
This is utterly incredible. Both quality of the video and reliability of crew safety.
You deserve much more subscribers.
Salutes to Russian space technology for such a reliable, safe and perfect emergency ejection system.
You are the only one who has really shown how the failure happened now, while every news article I saw had inaccuracies. Nicely done!
I had no idea that the Soyuz had a second emergency escape system in the shroud. That's really amazing and incredible foresight by the engineers back in the 80s. This accident happened seconds after the LES had been jettisoned too.
When the shroud boosters failed and then the shroud fell away, I assume the entire Soyuz spacecraft (instrument, rentry and habitat) modules were still attached so had to be immediately detached?
The Saturn V and Apollo spacecraft actually had two launch escape systems as well. The Launch Escape Tower (LET) on top of the Command Module would pull the crew cabin off the stack up until the burn out of the 1st stage, after which the LET was jettisoned. Then while on the 2nd and 3rd stages the Command and Service Modules, which were still connected together, would separate from the rocket and the SPS engine on the Service Module would fire to push the CSM safely away from the malfunctioning booster. Eventually the Service Module was jettisoned and the Command Module by itself would parachute into the ocean.
Scott Manley did a good video explaining and clearing up some questions. He did talk about the abort modes on the Soyuz and stuff.
This was deigned long before 1980s. Korolev had a hard rule that a manned rocket had to be able to save people at any stage of its flight, including launch.
@@alexeivoloshin5984 From what I've read the shroud boosters were added in the mid 80s.
No one, ever, was killed via soyuz. Period. And it's like almost half a century old and still in service. That's a lower casualty rate than passinger aircraft. That is how reliable a soyuz is.
The top-down view looks almost exactly like the footage roscosmos has released. Very nice work
Scott Manley where you at? I know you're watching xD
ua-cam.com/video/QMUJ004Dr8Q/v-deo.html
There's two weeks....
And he did that with beer! ;)
Scott video is now out! Not only that but the real video looks pretty much just like this...but lower quality.
@@danaen9985 Yes, I would love Scott Manley reaction on this video.
@@ApothecaryTerry exactly what i thought!
I wonder if we can get Scott to team up with Hazegrayart
for some of his videos...
This is an awesome depiction of what happened during the launch. Love your talent.
Bloody fantastic job with the recreation. The angles, the timing, it all very much helps get a much clearer view of the failure step by step as it happened.
To think only a handful of weeks ago we hardly understood the issue, now we have reach the point of such accurate simulations, with the problem already being corrected. How the progress of science marches on!!
Soyuz rocket, one beast of a machine, nice rocket simulation
What a ride. Nice work as usual Hazegrayart :)
Once again, great work. Thanks to your videos it's easier to understand how the failure went.
Some of the finer details of the timeline of this accident have eluded me... Until now. Thank you for shining some clarity on this for me AND for bringing us all of these excellent renderings!
This is absolutely stunning! Thank you for your work!!
Never came across your channel before. I am amazed by the quality of your work. This gives me the exact vision I was trying to picture in my head of what happened when Scott Manley was explaining it and showing those grainy videos. Thank you So Much for this. Consider me Subscribed.
For anyone who wants an explanation of what they're seeing, here's the quick version. The clearest view of all of the events is at 1:25. The view that's closest to the actual onboard footage we've seen is at 0:58.
The first stage of a Soyuz rocket detaches in four steps.
The launchpad abort rockets eject from the top of the rocket. Think of it as an ejector seat for the entire crew capsule. This is removed to save weight, as the rocket is high enough to not need it.
Second, the bottom clamps on the boosters release. The booster motors keep running for a moment after this to hinge each booster upwards on the joint at their tops.
Third, the joint at the top of each booster releases when the body of the boosters have hinged up far enough to not slam back into the rocket during step 4.
Last, small vents near the top of the boosters push them away from the center of the rocket. They spin safely away while the second stage is started.
The failure was in step 3. The Russian space agency tracked down the wreckage from the booster which didn't separate. They believe that the bolt in the center of the joint was bent during assembly. This would have caused the sensor to never reach the angle where it is programmed to send a signal to systems that automatically release the upper joint.
Because of this, the booster either hinged back down into the rocket or tore the entire joint off. Possibly both. Sensors linked to the systems that monitor which direction the rocket is facing detected that the ship could not be brought back under control and automatically ejected the crew capsule from the lower stages.
Props to Scott Manley, whose explanation is what I'm basing this on. Go check out his channel. He's smarter than I am.
Thanks!
9 o clock booster remained hinged and tore the skin of the core bursting it's fuel tanks in trying to peel away awesome animation can shed light on this incident
It didn't remain hinged (the only hinges are at the bottom of the booster), but it failed to turn the nose away from the core stage, which is why the damage occured.
@@maksphoto78 the assembly videos of ms10 show something akin to eye and bolt assembly at the d block top what can that be?
@Donovan Hale got that thanks Donovan
I can't believe this was done before the video footage was released. It's exactly the same. Well Done.
This is amazing! Thank God they survived!
Wow, it's pretty amazing how redundant this rocket is with the end goal of saving the astronauts lives. Amazing simulation!
Отличная анимация. Спасибо.
This is incredibly well done!👍
How did you manage ti be so accurate to the point that this was posted before the video was even published? and heck knowing you needed time to make this was even more impressive
Dude this is IMPRESSIVE Graphics!
Did you made the smoke a particle system, planes or smoke simulation?
Wow thanx, that clears a lot about the sequence of events for me.
Very realistic and quite accurate shown a procedures of separation and crew save. Thanks.
This animation is great, top work!
Your videos are top quality you deserve much more subs and views!
As for the failure, to me it shows how good the rocket is. They have had a failure on the pad and in flight and crew have survived.
I love this animation , good job :D
This Animation Explain very well the situation, Thank You Very Much, Grettings from Nicaragua!
You're my Hero! Thanx! Great job!
haha, roskosmos just released the video and it's exactly like showed in this simulation
Well done! This is better than the real video from the onboard camera!
Another awesome video mate
Perfect animation!
Love your videos, onboard camera shot was soo good, like the real one! :D
Amazing work!
Wow, you made this before the actual video of the onboard view came out and it looks so similar. You do really deserve more subscribers then you have right now. Hope some guys notice your talent.
Wow. Amazing! Thank you.
What a fantastic images. A really great job.
how can you make the simulation so REAL! that's awesome!
This is amazing. Actually shows you whats going on.
Exceptionally fine film!
Beautifully done
Pretty good simulation. Nice job.
WOW. nicely done!
ACCURATE Well done again Hazegrayart. You´re the best ! 😮👍
This is amazing!
Perfect, well done!
Awesome as per usual!
Awesome content and very nice rendering ! So cool !
with the exception of the MS-10 mission, every single soyuz mission since 1986 was a success. thinking of how the soyuz family is just a heavily modernized and upgraded R-7 design, it's impressive that these things works as damn well as they do.
That's really, really cool :D
Hey there space duck. Indeed it is.
As usual splendid work ;)
Bloody excellent!!! You filled in the gap of the real video - and that's exactly what I thought it would look like - if ya know what I mean. Gee you are good at this...
Awesome, really really awesome!
Well done animator and Soyuz
Красиво смоделировали!!! Респект!
Impressive simulation.
great video ! amazing!
This is insane! It looks so close to the Roscosmos video
Amazing animation
Very nice work!
Wow, great video once again
0 dislikes. Flat earthers havent found this
...yet
31 Flat earthers came
Now there's 234 of them
@@Eklyktinow theres 0 because no dislike
This is amazing. did it actually separate or was the ball bearing attached?
Fantastic sim!
Damn, that was super fast and accurate.
This is a perfect simulation videot
Fantastic!!
Very interesting. Shows what most likely happend with Soyus MS-10. And you were really quick, too.
One question out of curiosity: Is what we're seeing here the exact same animation from different perspectives or did you animate this more than once for visual reasons?
you did a great job
WOUAW what an amazing work man....
Nicely done.
Great job!!
Nice simulation !
What triggered the in-flight abort system? Your animation shows the Soyuz being pulled away by escape tower motors (or was it those in the capsule shroud?) before the (failed) booster separation.
The escape tower is jettisoned about 5 seconds before booster separation, the tower is only needed when the boosters are attached, the shroud can handle aborts once the boosters separate
2:19 Wait hold on they no longer have the escape tower!
2:29 Oh...
Thats some backup engines for abort when they alredy jettison the main escape towef
@@Alexander-kk5gj I know
Fantastic!
Another great video from Hazegrayart
Brilliant quality.
Awesome Animation
Looks just like the vid that came out today!!!! wow you rock!
What simulation program do you use? Is it Orbiter?
I can believe you put in the launch shoud leaving the rocket that such a cool detail and it’s true
Great animation
This animation is so good! How do you make it? Fantastic.
Why do you have to be so quick with your animations! Bagoomba.
I love your content
Excellent work Hazegrayart
Wow! Nice animation! :D Good job!
Your animation is made with more responsibility than our rockets are assembled.
A lot to geek out about on this one.
Very informative! Cool
Muy bien hecho!