Thanks for watching this animation! Be sure to check out some of my other content. 🚀📡 SpaceBytes: ua-cam.com/play/PLbkDkmLO8zBJt3F_orH9JeNNPx5BwRnvV.html Launch profiles: ua-cam.com/play/PLbkDkmLO8zBL1CzAMZ2-bSUo_jRMLPbVE.html
@@randomguy-jd8su still not smart enough to jettison the tower After booster separaton, still a good idea to have the faring abort anyway incase the tower fails to fire
@@astroaaron855 I flew an SLS Orion mission and Jen kept the underside of the capsule facing downward like a champ while the service module (which failed to disconnect) was released along with the heat shield during reentry. All crew survived.
They're not really "backup" escape rockets, even if the failure happened on the ground like in 1983, they would still be ignited after the signature "tower". The tower would first pull the capsule rapidly upwards away from the ground, then those smaller rockets in the fairing would pull it even further up. Then the third set of engines would pull the fairing off. The tower got jettisoned prior to the failure, but at this point it was unnecessary. The abort sequence just proceeded straight to the second phase, so to speak. So... yeah. They were not backup technically, [Engineer voice] ya damn Yankee.
This video deserves *way* more views and you deserve *way* more subscribers, just for this video. I still haven’t seen anybody else do a good a job of illustrating this flight as you have done!
Not quite. The launch escape tower was called upon to save the first crew of Soyuz T-10 in September 1983 when a fire on the launch pad blazed out of control. The rocket exploded about six seconds after the escape tower pulled the crew to safety. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_7K-ST_No.16L?wprov=sfti1
This was the first ever launch failure I saw live. I didn’t even realise it until a minute later as I was busy scrolling through my phone looking at the updates with what was a “nominal” launch running in the background
she said "the escape tower is jettisoned" and she's referring to the jettisoned tower above the capsule. She's not referring to the capsule itself. Getting rid of the launch escape tower is a normal part of launching. In this case, because they already jettisoned the tower, they had to use the backup fairing rockets to pull the capsule away.
Well, at that point you don't really need the full power of escape tower engines, as you're in flight already, but still need something to pull the ship away from the failing booster.
The escape tower is just extra boosters needed to escape during the early stages of launch. In later stages the thrust is lower so it is ditched, there are more boosters for escape in the fairings.
Makes you wonder why they get rid of the escape tower before staging begins. I know they probably passed max dynamic pressure already but they will probably learn from this.
I thought the launchpad had these: A giant pole at 2 points, then making circles to cover the Soyuz, also there was a ladder which was the 3. Pole, making the circles floors, the last 2. Floor was to get in the spacecraft. But i was wrong, it was just wedged blocks holding the Soyuz. P.S.: The design was from Rocket Tester Mobile Edition game on Roblox
I sure hope that our Musk’s SpaceX’s Starship have an escape plan in case something goes wrong. Cuz if there’s no escape plan, then the families can sue Musk. What do you think 🤔? NASA didn’t have an escape plan when the Challenger exploded.
The actual parachute touchdown is not correct. The capsule has no retro rockets. These are part of the parachute at a point where all the parachute lines join together above the capsule.
@@matthewsanetra Just checked. You are right about the current capsule. I was sure there was a different method used in dim dark past, with soft landing rockets being suspended on parachute not far above the capsule.
@@MrDomingo55 You're probably thinking about Voskhod. It used a redesigned Vostok capsule, but Vostok didn't have retro rockets since it used a catapulte for the cosmonaut. Voskhod didn't have a catapult and thus needed a smooth landing. But there was no place to fit the rockets on the capsule itself, so the engine was indeed suspended above the capsule. Soyuz originally had a retro rockets on the bottom covered by detatchable heat shield.
Thanks for watching this animation! Be sure to check out some of my other content. 🚀📡
SpaceBytes: ua-cam.com/play/PLbkDkmLO8zBJt3F_orH9JeNNPx5BwRnvV.html
Launch profiles: ua-cam.com/play/PLbkDkmLO8zBL1CzAMZ2-bSUo_jRMLPbVE.html
thought this was a rickroll
Ok
Backups on backups on backups on backups. This is why these guys got home. 60 years of experience launching Cosmonauts/Astronauts will do that.
Man, Russia is smart with their Soyuz. A backup, on a backup.
@@randomguy-jd8su still not smart enough to jettison the tower After booster separaton, still a good idea to have the faring abort anyway incase the tower fails to fire
@@nobodyneedstoknow.7308 ye
@@nobodyneedstoknow.7308 yup it is a little early
@@nobodyneedstoknow.7308 they did their calculations and they worked
I did this in KSP once, Bob and Bill Kerman were never the same after.
What happened to Jeb?
something like this happened to me too, but jebediah was the only one that survived
Kerbals are always happy. I deorbited a space station yesterday and the were smiling and dancing
@@astroaaron855
I flew an SLS Orion mission and Jen kept the underside of the capsule facing downward like a champ while the service module (which failed to disconnect) was released along with the heat shield during reentry. All crew survived.
Did they have uhh, Bipolar and PTSD?
Thank goodness for those backup escape rockets on the fairing!
They're not really "backup" escape rockets, even if the failure happened on the ground like in 1983, they would still be ignited after the signature "tower".
The tower would first pull the capsule rapidly upwards away from the ground, then those smaller rockets in the fairing would pull it even further up. Then the third set of engines would pull the fairing off.
The tower got jettisoned prior to the failure, but at this point it was unnecessary. The abort sequence just proceeded straight to the second phase, so to speak.
So... yeah. They were not backup technically, [Engineer voice] ya damn Yankee.
@@ahriman935 put dispenser
This video deserves *way* more views and you deserve *way* more subscribers, just for this video. I still haven’t seen anybody else do a good a job of illustrating this flight as you have done!
Very well made video! I'd love to see more animations from you in the future.
Thanks, I really appreciate that! I'm currently working on additional videos and hope to have some uploaded soon.
Simple Space 🚀
After they were pulled away they must’ve been sitting in the capsule just like:
‘Well fuck.’
😂😂😂😂😂😂
you did good Soyuz......every body came back home....
The escape tower: "Shit, years of successful missions, and on the one where we get to do the thing, I missed the fun bit".
Not quite. The launch escape tower was called upon to save the first crew of Soyuz T-10 in September 1983 when a fire on the launch pad blazed out of control. The rocket exploded about six seconds after the escape tower pulled the crew to safety.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_7K-ST_No.16L?wprov=sfti1
I wonder why you made the capsule green
This is a great example of a successful failure. Another example would be Apollo 13.
This was the first ever launch failure I saw live. I didn’t even realise it until a minute later as I was busy scrolling through my phone looking at the updates with what was a “nominal” launch running in the background
I came here to understand how they abort with the orbital module still attached and this made a heap of sense
I wish all the space accidents ended like that. Oh well, something wrong with a rocket, we saved people harmless.
2:55 subtittles: 26.7 puppies
Timers weath within slavers assumed jalloh 26.7 puppies
I wonder what happened to that .3...
@@Alex-si4vh yeah I was about to say that..
Cuz Google is deaf
Really cool animation.. got the ballistic entry right too
Astronaut: yay were going to space
Boster: Hold up
Minimums aviation what are you doing here??
They said that safety instructions was written in blood. That's why these two guys were safe
Yes. Im glad it never ended like soyuz 1. Edit: 2 years later and this is me when I was a kid XD
That’s one way to test the abort systems.
Yeah, but they wouldn't put people in it until it is fully tested.
@@tarkalak issa joke
So the soyuz has two escape systems?
My dad got to meet Rick ( One of the astronauts) soon after this mission...
What i thinking that rick
Well, space shuttle didn’t have that feature.
Perfect Machine. Thank you very much 230324.
I love how the narrator just calmly explains the situation
"and the escape capsule is jettisoned"
she said "the escape tower is jettisoned" and she's referring to the jettisoned tower above the capsule. She's not referring to the capsule itself. Getting rid of the launch escape tower is a normal part of launching. In this case, because they already jettisoned the tower, they had to use the backup fairing rockets to pull the capsule away.
good thinking! seperation is a point of faliure, they jettisoned the crew escape tower before the seperation, so its always good to have a backup
Well, at that point you don't really need the full power of escape tower engines, as you're in flight already, but still need something to pull the ship away from the failing booster.
This is exactly the problem that happened to me in KSP; when the SRBs seperated, they destroyed the main engine.
Crew capsule is located in the middle right? How tri-module seperation happened?
The lower one will be with the Soyuz rocket, and the upper one will be jettisoned with the abort tower
Ballistic descent mode is quite rough compared to a normal descent mode.
Also the fairing is called a launch shroud
Must be awfull to have an inflight Abort on your First flight
Thanks a lot
That wasn’t an escape tower lady, that was the crew
Thank good they have escape rocket
Hey the launchpad is rotating
outro song?
I'm confused, the escape tower was jettisoned but they still aborted?
The escape tower is just extra boosters needed to escape during the early stages of launch. In later stages the thrust is lower so it is ditched, there are more boosters for escape in the fairings.
the fairing has engines
601st Subscriber!!
Great job on this video - big difference from the N1 tragedies!
That soyus is the SHIP!!!!!
hm?
Imagine if this happens again on Friday lol
Luckily there were 2 abort systems
These Russians are good at building rockets!
Why do I have the feeling they are the best?!
The Soyuz has been developed over many years .
Well they aren't anymore
@Bastien Bongers well it’s only your uninformed opinion
IMO the escape tower should be jettisoned after the boosters have shutdown and separated.
We dont say soyuz but say it like sayuz
We pronounce this word like that, but we write "союз" not "саюз"
@@randomnessinaction6581 In Belarusian though, "саюз" is used.
The most expensive roller coaster ride
Makes you wonder why they get rid of the escape tower before staging begins. I know they probably passed max dynamic pressure already but they will probably learn from this.
They had a secondary launch escape system after the tower is jettisoned
Which worked
When you reach certain height and/or speed escape tower is no longer effective and can't really be used for what it is meant.
the escape tower would be an execive thrust and the crew would be a little injured of G forces so then only use the tower when its at the ground
i think mor than the tower jettisoned
I thought the launchpad had these: A giant pole at 2 points, then making circles to cover the Soyuz, also there was a ladder which was the 3. Pole, making the circles floors, the last 2. Floor was to get in the spacecraft. But i was wrong, it was just wedged blocks holding the Soyuz.
P.S.: The design was from Rocket Tester Mobile Edition game on Roblox
a bid before launch they retracted
If Ovchinin and Hague died, Soyuz missions would be suspended.
Lol. This is great
Союз,
UCCR Rocket
Стыдно
союз 10
18:47
I sure hope that our Musk’s SpaceX’s Starship have an escape plan in case something goes wrong. Cuz if there’s no escape plan, then the families can sue Musk. What do you think 🤔? NASA didn’t have an escape plan when the Challenger exploded.
The actual parachute touchdown is not correct. The capsule has no retro rockets. These are part of the parachute at a point where all the parachute lines join together above the capsule.
It does have retro rockets that fire just before touchdown to smooth out the landing since that capsule lands on land
@@matthewsanetra Just checked. You are right about the current capsule. I was sure there was a different method used in dim dark past, with soft landing rockets being suspended on parachute not far above the capsule.
@@MrDomingo55 I've never heard of that "past". I think you are confusing the earth capsule landings with the skycrane mars rover landing
@@MrDomingo55 You're probably thinking about Voskhod. It used a redesigned Vostok capsule, but Vostok didn't have retro rockets since it used a catapulte for the cosmonaut. Voskhod didn't have a catapult and thus needed a smooth landing. But there was no place to fit the rockets on the capsule itself, so the engine was indeed suspended above the capsule. Soyuz originally had a retro rockets on the bottom covered by detatchable heat shield.
@@РоманЕвгеньевичСеменко You may be right. I used to subscribe to "Spaceflight" magazine many years back (80s/90s) and maybe that is where I saw this.
Wow, amaizng animation, amused that Russians got 2 abort system
Russia
Ага, Россия
yes
the booster said naye naye time
Ha ha ha :-)