Rolex Submariner vs Omega Seamaster - Is Rolex Better Than Omega?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лип 2024
  • Join me for a brief comparison of the Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean. The two greatest dive watches of our time? Is Rolex really better than Omega?
    Facebook Group: The Daily Wristwatch Check
    Link to my storefront:
    teespring.com/stores/janthony...
    My Top 5 Watches Under $500:
    Seiko SKX
    Seiko Monster
    Seiko Padi Turtle
    Casio G-Shock
    Hamilton Khaki
    Follow Me on Facebook, Linkedin. Instagram & Twitter
    / janthony-channel-91659...
    / j-anthony-300270130
    / watch_janthony
    / j.anthony_youtube
    Link to my Motivational Channel:
    / @coachj.anthony8281
    Featured Music:
    Cold Killa by MK2
    Beat Your Competition by Vibe Tracks
    Chicago by Joe Bagale
    DOCTOR VOX - Frontier
    Soul (Vlog Music) by Dj Quads / aka-dj-quads
    Music promoted by Audio Library • Video
    Title: Soul (Vlog Music)
    Artist: Dj Quads
    Genre: Hip Hop & Rap
    Mood: Bright
    Download: goo.gl/vRVxSA
    6:09
    Least Expensive & Most Expensive States in the USA
    The Infographics Show
    Recommended for you
    New
    3:34
    Tobu - Higher
    Tobu
    16M views
    4:34
    DEAF KEV - Invincible [NCS Release]
    NoCopyrightSounds
    159M views
    3:59
    Elektronomia - Sky High [NCS Release]
    NoCopyrightSounds
    54M views
    6:54
    The XX - Intro HQ
    MrOAKcheese
    116M views
    1:51:20
    'Infinite' Ambient Mix
    Ambient
    Recommended for you
    4:52
    Electro-Light - Symbolism [NCS Release]
    NoCopyrightSounds
    106M views
    1:56:49
    Top 30 NoCopyRightSounds | Best of NCS | 2H NoCopyRightSounds | NCS : The Best of all time
    Magic NCS
    29M views
    3:47
    Alan Walker - Spectre [NCS Release]
    NoCopyrightSounds
    193M views
    4:20
    Spektrem - Shine [NCS Release]
    NoCopyrightSounds
    77M views
    8:30
    Most Beautiful Music Ever: "Everdream" by Epic Soul Factory
    HDSounDI
    Recommended for you
    6:04
    Blackmill Feat. Veela - Let It Be (Full Version)
    BlackmillMusic
    14M views
    1:28:01
    Abraham Hicks 2017 🌀 90 Minutes Loop Meditation Before Bed(NO ADS During Meditation)
    Eternal-Thoughts Law of Attraction
    Recommended for you
    3:54
    [No Copyright Music] Rock Angel - Joakim Karud
    Audio Library - No Copyright Music
    3.7M views
    4:12
    Avicii - Wake Me Up
    Proximity
    10M views
    30:20
    Epic Battle Music VI
    MisthiC
    Recommended for you
    5:51
    ATB - Ecstasy (Morten Granau Remix)
    Beat Lounge
    15M views
    Disfigure - Blank [NCS Release]
    • Disfigure - Blank | Me...
    ► Music Credit: LAKEY INSPIRED
    Track Name: "Beyond"
    Music By: LAKEY INSPIRED @ / lakeyinspired
    Original upload HERE - / . .
    Official "LAKEY INSPIRED" UA-cam Channel HERE - ua-cam.com/channels/Omy.html...
    License for commercial use: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported "Share Alike" (CC BY-SA 3.0) License.
    Full License HERE - creativecommons.org/licenses/...
    Music promoted by NCM goo.gl/fh3rEJ
    Track: Showdown - Freedom (feat. IMAN) [NCS Release]
    Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds.
    Watch: • Showdown - Freedom (fe...
    Free Download / Stream: ncs.io/FreedomYO

КОМЕНТАРІ • 253

  • @Ilestun
    @Ilestun 3 роки тому +79

    This planet ocean is just so beautiful. What a masterpiece. Can't get this watch out of my head.

    • @hathaway.1166
      @hathaway.1166 2 роки тому +2

      Yep, just came to this watch an hour before NNN.

    • @jameswood1935
      @jameswood1935 Рік тому +1

      i daily this exact watch, its a cracker

  • @surfitli
    @surfitli 5 років тому +72

    I would go for the Omega, I just personally like everything about it better.

  • @devilzdandruff9199
    @devilzdandruff9199 4 роки тому +65

    The Omega just looks so much better imo.

    • @UCZ15
      @UCZ15 3 роки тому +5

      SO much better. Leaps and bounds better. It is so much more interesting. Don't think you could ever get bored of the shine, pop of orange and the amazing shapes of the hands.

    • @pb8876
      @pb8876 3 роки тому +9

      @@UCZ15 I have this omega planet ocean. Great little watch. You feel so much younger while wearing it compared to the sub. It just has youthful vibes compared to the rolex sub.

    • @davidkaplan5517
      @davidkaplan5517 3 роки тому +3

      @@pb8876 I have both of these watches and I’m in my 20s neither aren’t youthful. The bracelet on the planet ocean I think is better quality. The omega movement is better too I think. Both are unreal great.

    • @pb8876
      @pb8876 3 роки тому +1

      @@davidkaplan5517 I suppose its what you feel personally. The first planet ocean is a newer fresher design. I initially intended on getting a sub but I felt it didn't suit me. The planet ocean felt more me so that's what I bought.

  • @rondj1965
    @rondj1965 Рік тому +14

    Awesome review. I bought a pre-owned Omega PO with the 8500 co-axial movement. I got it for a third of the price of the Submariner, and in my opinion, was a more advanced watch for the money. Don't get me wrong, I love the Rolex brand, I just refuse to pay 50% or higher, above MSRP for ANY watch.

  • @jefferyneu3915
    @jefferyneu3915 5 років тому +29

    Nice comparison! For my money, the Omega wins every time. I do love the classic styling of the Rolex, but the movement wins me over to choose the Omega.

  • @Dafglyn100Williams
    @Dafglyn100Williams 4 роки тому +12

    One thing that really sets this piece apart form the Rolex and the less expensive Seamaster 300 is the applied datewheel, it is not printed as on the rolex , it is actually applied white gold and is raised, if you look at it with a loupe it is a work of art, truly sets the watch into real quality. The applied Omega on the dial, and the ceramic dial versus the brass and lacquer of the rolex, the rolex has a printed dial..the bracelet itself is worked to a higher quality brush and fit then the Seamaster 300, and equal or better to the Rolex, which is a smudge magnet on the sides.

  • @jimmyjay122
    @jimmyjay122 5 років тому +94

    Have been seeing many of these comparisons between the new Seamasters (Professional 300m & Planet Ocean) and Submariner, and my choice is always the same. Omega for the win every time, even if they were priced the same as the Sub.
    I never found that understated aesthetic of Rolex appealing in anyway. Not to mention the things I actually find somewhat cheesy and off putting. From that “Mercedes” hour hand to the inscriptions on the dial that is trying so desperately to standout, downright to the logo which always struck me as resembling a jester’s hat rather than an actual crown. And the bracelets... oh bracelets. There isn’t enough high-end steal alloys or well machined clasps that can ever make me stomach those “iconic” bracelets. They always seemed disproportionate to the case with an abrupt transition at the lugs that just always kills it for me every time I but on a Sub, GMT Master II, Yacht Master II...
    I will not argue the resale aspect, the market is what it is, but I never bought a watch with the intention of selling it later on. So that allowed me the freedom of buying what I liked and not what seemed like a good investment. And thankfully impressing myself is far more important to me than impressing others who lust after the Rolex name that was mostly built upon very successful marketing & branding strategies not so much the quality and definitely not the aesthetics.

    • @mr2bmw
      @mr2bmw 4 роки тому +5

      Amen!

    • @Rangerglx
      @Rangerglx 4 роки тому +5

      I have a late 90's Omega Seamaster that was rebuilt for the 3rd time. Just got it back and fell in love again. However I did just get a Planet Ocean, WOW!

    • @PepRex
      @PepRex 4 роки тому

      @@Rangerglx which planet ocean?

    • @Rangerglx
      @Rangerglx 4 роки тому +1

      Bought in the secondary market it’s a 8500, 45.5 case black with orange 12, 6, and 9.

    • @Rangerglx
      @Rangerglx 4 роки тому

      The Omega bracelets are the best! My PO has a plain black rubber band with that cool clasp. I will look to acquire maybe a Seamaster bracelet for it.

  • @JustBlueFish
    @JustBlueFish 5 років тому +9

    Hey, you haven't put out a lot of videos lately. I'm glad to see this one. Thanks!

    • @JANTHONYCHANNEL
      @JANTHONYCHANNEL  5 років тому +2

      Thanks for watching, I know I’ve been gone for a while and I appreciate people still watching my content.

  • @Martrex296
    @Martrex296 5 років тому +49

    They should have just called the watch the "Omega Planet Ocean" and kept it a separate line from
    the Seamaster. There are too many variations in the Seamaster series.

    • @Drew10006
      @Drew10006 Рік тому

      Yes I agree the seamaster is not a patch on planet ocean..

  • @b.2221
    @b.2221 4 роки тому +3

    No nonsense, and no bullshit, and your delivery and knowledgeable opinion is a breath of fresh air. Really glad I came across this channel Sir 👍 Tam.

  • @mic911c2
    @mic911c2 2 роки тому +4

    I have both. For me there's no winner. They wear both comfortable and are daily wearable. I have a blue Planet Ocean on a rubber strap btw.

  • @Flu_Tang_Clan
    @Flu_Tang_Clan 4 роки тому +22

    I always wanted a sub, but the prices are out of control. I'm going with the PO and putting the extra 4k towards expanding the collection.

    • @remuswheeler2264
      @remuswheeler2264 3 роки тому +2

      Did the same thing. Bought an Omega Speedmaster racing and a planet ocean. Was a little bit more expensive than a sub but more than worth it. Both are so beautiful and accurate! Just love the brand! They know how to make real masterpieces!

    • @willielarsson9651
      @willielarsson9651 3 роки тому

      I'm in the same boat JS, not sure whether to just go for the Omega, I'm sick of the AD bullshit

    • @philly816
      @philly816 3 роки тому

      @@remuswheeler2264 congratulations. Having the speedy and the p.o is a great choice. Love them both. Am torn now between the 43.5 p.o and 44 diver 300 chrono

  • @chrisrussell63
    @chrisrussell63 5 років тому +11

    I would more likely compare the Omega to the new Sea Dweller, 43mm also, and with both the newest 3235 movement and a Helium escape valve. The new movement is close to the superb accuracy of the Omega Co-Ax movement, and the larger case is more aligned to the tastes of today. Although the Sea Dweller is close to twice as expensive as the Planet Ocean, it's still very desirable, in fact tough to find available in stores.

    • @jameswood1935
      @jameswood1935 Рік тому

      cam ehere to say this - i daily a PO 42 mm 8500, and want a SD 4k, when ive tried them the SD4k is lower profile and lighter. Its a beaut and i still want it but was surprised.... Sub shouldt be in this comparison IMO

  • @timwood958
    @timwood958 5 років тому +8

    Have the 600M with a rubber strap. Super comfortable, gets worn often and the date is ok to see from any angle (tho it's a bit dark for my eyes with the black background). Everyone loves the orange/black strap. It's a toss up between that and the Big Pilot for daily wear (huge date display, super nice). Have the GMT II Pepsi and another green Sub, it feels small and the magnification to me is a bit annoying because I always have to turn the watch right to my eyes to properly catch the date. I do have the DeepSea, that date window is not magnified and is so easy to see (even underwater) with the high contrast white background. Definitely prefer the no-magnification Rolex configuration.

    • @mja1691
      @mja1691 5 років тому +2

      I have that 600 to bruv, its immense... solid.. NOT TOO BIG... and a bit more flare that the bog sub

  • @richieroo4844
    @richieroo4844 5 років тому +5

    For sure the Omega , looks far nicer to me too , thanks for a great video.

  • @Mixnotes
    @Mixnotes 5 років тому +15

    Love the omega. Great video!

  • @thestig007
    @thestig007 5 років тому +14

    Idiots will know that your watch is expensive if you wear Rolex. I think that's why people are buying them up, to impress idiots who know nothing about watches.

    • @coclim5712
      @coclim5712 5 років тому +3

      TheStig ZeroZeroZero so many idiots around huh...

    • @greenerick
      @greenerick 4 роки тому +2

      Plus less likely to get mugged wearing Seamaster than a Rolex

    • @joeallfrontsquiet8797
      @joeallfrontsquiet8797 4 роки тому +1

      @@greenerick Omg, where do you live to worry so much about being mugged?

  • @vincenzostr4488
    @vincenzostr4488 3 роки тому +6

    Omega is a masterpiece of watchmaking engineering

  • @cory5525
    @cory5525 4 роки тому +5

    I own the Omega. I prefer the hands and overall look of the dial over the Submariner. Money saved buying the PO, I can buy a Speedy too!

  • @scottlalonde2878
    @scottlalonde2878 Рік тому

    Great video, thank you. You don't seem to be making vids lately, but the ones you've made are still appreciated 🙂👍

  • @georgepapa4052
    @georgepapa4052 3 роки тому +6

    Planet Ocean is the best diver there is.

  • @thomasanonymous594
    @thomasanonymous594 3 роки тому +6

    I would love to see, a slimmer and thinner watch in the Omega Planet Ocean line, perhaps one that was waterproof to 300 m instead of 600 m, but with all the benefits of the big 600 m brother. This kind of a more "city-friendly", yet very robust Omega watch, could be a commercial hit for the Omega company and probably a very good watch in general. After this, I just like to wish you a peaceful Advent season, a Merry Christmas and not at least that God will bless you, sir!

  • @Jakelol1980
    @Jakelol1980 4 роки тому +3

    Im so happy that i got the 42mm Planet Ocean before they stopped making the 42mm.

  • @ItaiFaierman
    @ItaiFaierman 5 років тому +4

    Great review! 👏 I’ve owned both and opted for the Submariner, for the most part, because of that glide lock system.

  • @anjadorn4177
    @anjadorn4177 5 років тому +1

    Hey, you are back on Track 👍

  • @shipmate3577
    @shipmate3577 4 роки тому +5

    These two, plus the Glashutte Original SeaQ, are the best 3 dive watches under $10,000.
    Check out the Glashutte Original SeaQ.

  • @Professional_Youtube_Commenter
    @Professional_Youtube_Commenter 5 років тому +15

    My eyes drift towards the omega, the submariner has sort of become boring because so many watch companies have homages the submariner that it feels like you've seen it a thousand times.
    If you try and force yourself to look at the sub with fresh eyes and ignore whatyou've already seen before it is quite nice.

  • @daletaylorjr.4786
    @daletaylorjr.4786 5 років тому +4

    Great review as always.
    I appreciate both watches but would go with the Omega. I’d love to own a Rolex but they leave a bad taste in my mouth.

  • @gurmeetsinghkalsi
    @gurmeetsinghkalsi 3 роки тому +3

    I would choose both.
    Any donators ?

  • @stanoster3417
    @stanoster3417 5 років тому +3

    I’ll take the Seamaster Professional, because I prefer a larger watch on my wrist.

  • @cedarcanoe
    @cedarcanoe 5 років тому +21

    The Rolex bracelet became like too-small with that supercase. Thanks for the vid!

    • @JANTHONYCHANNEL
      @JANTHONYCHANNEL  5 років тому +3

      Yeah, the 20mm does look a little off haha. Thank you

  • @vicg5323
    @vicg5323 4 роки тому +2

    I nevery buy a watch based on resale value. I buy what I like for the best price period. Omega is my choice. Have had mine for 20 years. Pay 1500 new and can sell it for more used. But it was never my goal to sell. I am too attached.

  • @karbonkevin919
    @karbonkevin919 2 роки тому +2

    tbh I love the escape valve on the omega.

  • @bellerophon9116
    @bellerophon9116 2 роки тому +3

    I do agree, you can't go wrong with either given the way most people with use them, and much of it simply comes down to preference of brand and style. They both have their merits and points to criticize. But, I think you get more watch for your dollar with the Omega. I would also add that the Omega Planet Ocean is really Omega's answer to the Rolex Sea Dweller and not the Submariner regarding it's depth rating. I would also go so far as to say the merits of movement can be argued to be superior to the Rolex Submariner as well.

  • @gavinducco7915
    @gavinducco7915 5 років тому

    Nice! Good to see videos from you again!

  • @77cjam
    @77cjam 5 років тому +12

    Definitely between these two I'd choose the Omega. I just think it's a nicer looking watch. To be honest the Sub is probably my least liked Rolex model. Perhaps because it's been homaged to death I just find it boring. Airking precision would be my Rolex of choice. But as with everything, all a matter of personal taste. Thanks for video man 👌

  • @lilpapi4399
    @lilpapi4399 2 роки тому +2

    The Omega is a superior watch on every category.
    Two things about the Rolex sub that people do not talk about:
    1. It magnetizes easily and never really keeps time (COSC).
    2. It’s just boring.

  • @ItsTimePictures
    @ItsTimePictures 4 роки тому +5

    While the finishing on the newer planet oceans is phenomenal I still prefer the look and feel of the first iteration. The ceramic models are so thick it’s like wearing a hockey puck on your wrist. What a shame the 2500 movements are so prone to suffering from magnetic issues. Mine became magnetized three times in about six months. That’s why I ended up selling it. Today I have the latest Seamaster 300 professional with the 8800 movement. It ticks most of the boxes for me and is likely to be a keeper.

  • @Ramblin_Man
    @Ramblin_Man 5 років тому

    Great video, J. I would take the PO, for the great looks combined with the tech.

  • @VicharB
    @VicharB 5 років тому +3

    Have OP 8500 version and if I had to go for new one it will be Omega again; really don't like the cyclope date on Rolex, otherwise it is beautiful, but unjustifiably costly as per me.

  • @mja1691
    @mja1691 5 років тому +5

    GREAT VID!! the omega will never win only due to branding and the sub history. BUT IT IS THE BETTER WATCH

  • @JB-ou6fl
    @JB-ou6fl Рік тому +1

    I personally prefer the Planet Ocean because the dial looks so beautiful. I also like the benefits of the master co-axial movement.

  • @stevealperstein8836
    @stevealperstein8836 4 роки тому +3

    Nice review. Since Rolex do not have any Submariners or Sea-Dwellers available for sale it would be fitting for reviewers to stop reviewing their watches. I have a PO 43.5 and it's a great watch. Rolex is also great but their unavailability is just irksome.

  • @floridagarye9288
    @floridagarye9288 5 років тому +1

    You mentioned the newer Sub C has a divers extension, but it only has the Glidelock.

  • @Nick-wc2ul
    @Nick-wc2ul 5 років тому +7

    Rolex has the name and the money value during time. Thats why we pay so much for them. Technicaly i dont think it is better. Maybe the same.

  • @MrCdrant
    @MrCdrant 4 роки тому +1

    Should have done a comparison between a PO and a two-toned Sub, because that's all you're going to be able to buy.

  • @MrChipBryant
    @MrChipBryant 5 років тому +1

    Good video.. Thank you

  • @alexeybarkovskiy9357
    @alexeybarkovskiy9357 5 років тому +2

    Wow been away for so long!

  • @Mohammedalyafeimusic
    @Mohammedalyafeimusic 5 років тому +3

    Of course I’ll get the OMEGA Planet Ocean.. especially with 8900 movement. It’s technically better, more accurate, fresh design, tested by OMEGA, COSC & METAS and it’s so comfortable.

  • @juniorjr5328
    @juniorjr5328 5 років тому

    Personally went with the sea dweller 40mm instead. After wearing awhile and then picking up my polar or batman, I kind of understand why people dislike the cyclops as this SD slowly grows on me

  • @corybrown9933
    @corybrown9933 2 роки тому

    I also love the orange highlights

  • @ticktology
    @ticktology 2 роки тому +1

    I own a blue Planet Ocean and I love it. The technology is all there with the movement, METAS, exhibition caseback, shiny ceramic dial, 600m WR, crisp and tight bezel action, the list goes on. And I didn’t have to kiss a Rolex AD’s ass to wait 12 months to buy it 🤷🏻‍♂️ I also own a SMP 300m and Speedmaster Racing and all 3 are perfect watches at a great value. If you’re looking for a quality timepiece that is readily available with no BS, buy an Omega. You will love it!

  • @willielarsson9651
    @willielarsson9651 3 роки тому +1

    The Rolex strap is so much nicer, especially where it meets the bezel

  • @user-gr3rk6ur2p
    @user-gr3rk6ur2p 5 років тому

    6/24/2019 cool review thank you .

  • @The_God_of_Sexual_Intercourse
    @The_God_of_Sexual_Intercourse 5 років тому +7

    Is an hour at the massage parlor better than getting a bloody root canal?

  • @markpercival2619
    @markpercival2619 5 років тому +3

    Welcome back. You have been missed. I know it’s more ‘work’ for you but, please do keep your channel going. Now, to the watches. The Omega is more legible, nicer to look at to my eyes, has a brilliant bracelet and packs a killer movement and better tech...but it’s 2mm to wide and about 3mmm too thick. The Rolex has a tired but tried and true movement and is unmistakably a Rolex with all that stands for, and it’s an easier size for more people to wear. Sadly, in today’s market it holds value better over the Omega, but it’s generally unobtainable at retail and MSRP. So, Omega it is. Until your next video. Cheers.

    • @JANTHONYCHANNEL
      @JANTHONYCHANNEL  5 років тому

      Thanks Mark, I really appreciate it. UA-cam is a passion project and outlet for me. I hear your points, I also can see why the Blackbay 58 does so well as a cheaper play against these.

  • @sealevelbear
    @sealevelbear 3 роки тому +4

    I love the Omega, but obviously the Submariner is an awesome watch too. If they were the same price I’d get a Submariner date, but for half the cost, I’ll grab a P.O.!

    • @jameswood1935
      @jameswood1935 Рік тому +1

      PO more like a third of cost, probably one of the better value watches out there

    • @sealevelbear
      @sealevelbear Рік тому

      @@jameswood1935 Touché. I guess my issue is I want the titanium PO on bracelet, and that ups the $$

  • @starwatcher73
    @starwatcher73 3 роки тому +1

    which one is „thicker“ ?

  • @bigbrotherwatchesdannyboy306
    @bigbrotherwatchesdannyboy306 2 роки тому +1

    The watch geek in me says Planet Ocean but the investor says Submariner.

  • @juliantakeshiquayle6193
    @juliantakeshiquayle6193 5 років тому +2

    If I had a choice only between these two, I'd chose the sub, but I'd much prefer an Omega for other choices. Plant Ocean just a tad out of my comfort range on size. I do like the features of it though, even if they don't get used. With the Sub and the Plant Ocean, I still haven't fallen in love with the ceramic bezels yet personally. Maybe I'll change my mind once I get to see them in person. I actually don't like the maxi dial either. It's subtle but it would slowly eat away at me if I had it on my wrist everyday. Great too see you back in action! welcome back dude

    • @JANTHONYCHANNEL
      @JANTHONYCHANNEL  5 років тому

      Thanks Julian, I love the ceramic. I’m curious what you’d make of it if you saw it in person.

  • @x3mperformace
    @x3mperformace 5 років тому

    The Oyster case, uhh, Oyster "only" means it's water resistant and that is has a screw down crown and screw in back. Not how deep it goe's or what shape the case have....

  • @kevinpoole9662
    @kevinpoole9662 3 роки тому +1

    Omega ... I have that exact one and it's perfection to me.

  • @kofiofosu9051
    @kofiofosu9051 2 роки тому +1

    I have a submariner, but I’m buying a planet ocean tomorrow. Looking forward to that blue PO

  • @pedrosaenz2800
    @pedrosaenz2800 5 років тому +6

    Omega Seamaster 300m is the one to compare. Basel 2018 model from Omega.

    • @jayukryn9077
      @jayukryn9077 5 років тому

      Yes, the 300m is the more classic of the Omegas.

    • @JANTHONYCHANNEL
      @JANTHONYCHANNEL  5 років тому

      Solid point, I’ve reviewed one of those as well.

    • @mtp1979
      @mtp1979 5 років тому

      @@JANTHONYCHANNEL either that or review the PO to the seadweller...

  • @NorCalLuxury
    @NorCalLuxury 5 років тому

    Great video 👍

  • @Nexus.Achiles
    @Nexus.Achiles 3 роки тому

    I own a PO2500C 45.5 and a SD43. The first one cost me 1,550 pounds in 2005, the second one 10,450 euros in 2017. For the money, the PO is far ahead. However, the SD43 is a better watch if money is no object.

  • @obrownboy09
    @obrownboy09 Рік тому

    Can someone pls confirm the reference number for the omega?

  • @jimbuddabing557
    @jimbuddabing557 2 роки тому

    I have a Cameron deep sea, and just plopped down for the 43.5 planet ocean in white face and orange dial, its pretty nice actually 👌 omega is no joke...

  • @NNK83
    @NNK83 4 роки тому

    It should be compared like this: Submariner Vs Seamaster 300M, Planet Ocean Vs Deepsea, Daytona Vs Speedmaster Professional, Globe Master Vs Rolex Day Date, Constellation Vs Datejust etc

    • @NNK83
      @NNK83 4 роки тому

      @Vox Optimatium youre right and then Deepsea vs plofprof

  • @mgofferg6216
    @mgofferg6216 3 місяці тому

    I own both. The exact same PO you have in the video and a Submariner No Date 114060. I alternate between the 2 every other day. Tbh I favor the PO just a little bit over the Sub, owning both the main thing I will say is this: the PO power reserve kicks the crap out of the Sub’s. For a brand that claims is superior their power reserve sucks compared to the Omega. Best bang per buck Omega is the winner as well. The PO just feels like it’s tougher than the Sub as well.

  • @gilbertparas3278
    @gilbertparas3278 5 років тому

    See the logo in the Center of Glass ,,made of sapphire

  • @BigAl60504
    @BigAl60504 4 роки тому +1

    I own the Planet ocean 45mm.... It looks much better on my large wrist and I love the small date window over that cyclops nonsense. If I did get a submariner I would get the no date version. I am looking at the Rolex Explorer non GMT with no date....That watch can dress up and down and does not weigh a ton like my Seamaster does!

  • @dzikijohnny
    @dzikijohnny 5 років тому

    Great video. Could you give price ranges. Also Omega use to have best commercials with Sasha Cohen skating in a black catsuit.

    • @JANTHONYCHANNEL
      @JANTHONYCHANNEL  5 років тому +2

      Used...figure $9k for the Rolex and $4k for the Omega.

    • @dzikijohnny
      @dzikijohnny 5 років тому

      J. ANTHONY Thanks

    • @j.devine9126
      @j.devine9126 4 роки тому

      @@JANTHONYCHANNEL I just paid $4,595.00 for my new Omega Planet Ocean model #21530442103001. Same watch as shown in this video with 43.5MM case but with the blue face and dial. It's half the cost of a Rolex with the same quality.

  • @SJ-qf3ns
    @SJ-qf3ns Рік тому

    Inside the bezel...it's 100% Omega. The dial, hands, the logo, painted second hand, all play off each other so well. The bezel though, case, it's all Rolex with the smaller, tighter numbers, lower profile. Either one is a winner though.

  • @richardstevens8839
    @richardstevens8839 3 роки тому

    PO is a sexy watch but the Circular markers on the Rolex are to die for

  • @stevenoasis1
    @stevenoasis1 5 років тому +3

    This comparison is being done almost every other day now on UA-cam. Answer - 114060 >.

    • @jfm562
      @jfm562 5 років тому

      Steven which one can someone buy new today at or below MSRP?

  • @greenbow7888
    @greenbow7888 2 роки тому

    I preferred the POs when they had red insted of orange, like on the second hand, and text on the dial.

    • @scottmorrison147
      @scottmorrison147 5 місяців тому

      I think orange has now been the adopted PO color.

  • @Ab24_5qh
    @Ab24_5qh 2 роки тому

    My wife bought me the black planet ocean for a 25th anniversary gift........it is very very nice!

  • @gzw1409
    @gzw1409 2 роки тому

    I would prefer the Planet Ocean, cause I like the look better than the look of the Sub and the movement of Omega is the better one.

  • @heliocruz7813
    @heliocruz7813 3 роки тому

    You should compare The 39,5mm size.

  • @jarodstevens2710
    @jarodstevens2710 5 років тому +2

    I'd have to go with Omega it seems like everybody's got a Rolex the Omega would compliment my Tudor black Bay Steel and I just really like omegas Style looking to get a constellation globemaster I just think it's a far better watch than anything Rolex puts out personal opinion though

    • @jfm562
      @jfm562 5 років тому

      Jarod I agree. I don't wantbwhatv"everyone" else wants.

  • @Nexus.Achiles
    @Nexus.Achiles 4 роки тому

    A PITA to set the date in this Omega. You need to move the hour hand 24 times forward or backward to move one day on the date window. No quick date set. Who needs to change the hour hand in 1 hour increments if not moving between time zones? They get rid of a useful feature by introducing a pointless one.
    I own one of the latest Speedy's with the 9900 cal., same thing, so annoying. I sometimes leave the date unset.

    • @Nexus.Achiles
      @Nexus.Achiles 3 роки тому

      Same here with my Speedy 9900, I leave the date unset unless it's only a few days off. I own the first PO2500C 45.5, no such problem.

  • @ripperx444
    @ripperx444 3 роки тому +3

    I had a sub c black and hulk but also owned the planet ocean that you show here and the blue one on the rubber. Now I have the orange bezel PO and I like it over Rolex by a lot. It’s just different

  • @juani2903
    @juani2903 4 роки тому +1

    Omega is the best, COSC and METAS Certifications.

  • @chewrick565
    @chewrick565 3 роки тому +1

    Proud owner of the Omega P.O

  • @markwertschnig8766
    @markwertschnig8766 Рік тому

    Love both, but Omega for me. In looking at the PO for my first luxury watch. The Rolex’s dial just seems too crammed.

  • @threecats8219
    @threecats8219 4 роки тому

    I think with Rolex's -1 to +1 sec/day, it becomes hard to choose anything else. (Unless you get one losing time.) However I don't really like any of the Rolex's that much. If you get lucky with an Omega at +1 sec/day, then you did good. Better plus than negative time per day, no matter what. Hence that makes Omega's master certification a plus point.

    • @clarksmith9890
      @clarksmith9890 2 роки тому

      Mine is running with 1-2 second variance, can’t complain.

  • @georgecupac1202
    @georgecupac1202 3 роки тому +1

    I'd get the Rolex ONLY because I don't like the arrow hands on the Omega

    • @6bigears135
      @6bigears135 3 роки тому

      Im the opposite i dont like the seiko Mercedes hands..........really boring

  • @Martrex296
    @Martrex296 5 років тому +2

    Nice video, Omega do make the Planet Ocean in a 39.5mm version as well.

  • @cakeisgod1
    @cakeisgod1 4 роки тому +1

    I can't decide between a planet Ocean or Seamaster 300

    • @rooterman2619
      @rooterman2619 2 роки тому

      I wish they could combine all the best of both watches 300 and Planet Ocean. I have both and a sub. I love the Seamaster 300 as my daily. I wish it had the case of the 300, the arrow hands and dial of PO and the smaller HE of the old 2500 watch all in a 13.7mm thick watch. Then add the PO bracelet as an option and it blows away the sub. The AR coating is a step above in all lighting vs the sub. Makes a big difference to me.

  • @Tonysoprano497
    @Tonysoprano497 3 роки тому +1

    In the metal the omega is just so much more impressive . Sold my 2018 brought in new omega po for half the price . My opinion twice the watch half the price ...

    • @pb8876
      @pb8876 3 роки тому +1

      The rolex submariner is a beautiful piece, with a timeless design,,,but it's still a snooze fest and expensive. A lot of money to spend in order to be bored after a short while.
      I bought this exact planet ocean and have no regrets.

  • @julesmaximusmeridius9064
    @julesmaximusmeridius9064 Рік тому

    Have both , both beautiful watches . If you can get over the I have a Rolex look at me snobbery then the Omega is a better watch

  • @johngalt7818
    @johngalt7818 2 роки тому

    Solid case back with hippocampus feels more substantial. I don’t like the see through crap.

  • @audiman7716
    @audiman7716 5 років тому +1

    I own both as well as the new SMP Diver 300. The thickness of the PO keeps me from wearing it often. But for me the new SMP 300 beats both of them

  • @umbrollo
    @umbrollo Рік тому

    How odd the title was which is better but he says “I am not getting in to which is better “

  • @gregwalker4236
    @gregwalker4236 5 років тому +3

    if money is no object must have both!

  • @steelstunners1862
    @steelstunners1862 5 років тому +2

    Yes (without watching the video) 😀

  • @TheMystro1971
    @TheMystro1971 4 роки тому +1

    Own both. The Omega is a better and more advanced watch all price being equal. I find Rolex is coasting and now way over rated at their current price point. I own many Rolex watches and I'll just say they are now not worth the current money. They just are not. I'll save those that really want the best diver regardless of price, get the new Omega PO. The only redeeming quality of Rolex now is their resale value .

  • @robertn3121
    @robertn3121 5 років тому +1

    The answer to your question is yes.

  • @carlashcroft6652
    @carlashcroft6652 2 роки тому

    It doesn't matter which watch is the best, which one do you want?