Which Size Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 жов 2024
  • 215.30.40.20.03.001
    40.4mm case
    14.4mm thick
    19mm lug width
    45.4mm lug to lug
    Cal. 8800 w/ 55 hours power reserve
    600m water resistance
    187.1 grams
    215.30.44.21.03.001
    43.6mm case
    16.3mm thick
    48.8mm lug to lug
    21mm lug width
    Cal. 8900 w/ 60 hours power reserve
    600m water resistance
    215.7 grams
    $7,100
    brentmiller.com/
    brad@brentlmiller.com
    717-569-5450

КОМЕНТАРІ • 46

  • @ianwoollard2063
    @ianwoollard2063 8 місяців тому +5

    I have the 43 myself but all that really matters is what best fits your wrist. The tool free bracelet adjustment feature is going to give you a comfortable fit so it becomes quite an easy decision. I say again that it’s the best watch I’ve ever owned. Love Omega

  • @ivonemec8059
    @ivonemec8059 Місяць тому +1

    Both are perfect,but for me definitely the bigger ones.

  • @austinlawrence8477
    @austinlawrence8477 8 місяців тому +2

    Both are tanks! I love my 43mm, the first watch I purchased from Brent Miller.

  • @robertlock6041
    @robertlock6041 8 місяців тому +3

    Hi Brad, Omega tool watch case design is truly excellent, and statistics don't give an accurate picture as to how they will fit on the wrist.
    Given the information presented here though, of these I'd go for the larger model because of the movement really, but in truth I'd need to try them on before making a definitive decision. As you say Brad, both models are excellent watches. 👌 🙂🍻

  • @ryanelectra225
    @ryanelectra225 8 місяців тому +1

    Beautiful watches.I have the 43 in orange/white, but I love this blue too

  • @paulbrown2422
    @paulbrown2422 8 місяців тому +1

    One of my friends bought the 43.5mm as his first real luxury watch and loves it.
    My wrist is a bit smaller, so I think I would go for the 39.5mm.

  • @spartus56996
    @spartus56996 8 місяців тому +5

    39.5 mm

  • @rossdev
    @rossdev 8 місяців тому +2

    Easy pick for me, has to be the 43mm version. I just think the proportions of the 39mm look wrong. It's a 600m dive watch so being on the larger side is ok! I’ve a small 6.5 inch wrist but I’ve no problem wearing mine, lug to lug it wears smaller than the SMP 300.

    • @rajm6494
      @rajm6494 3 місяці тому

      Do you wear yours on a bracelet or strap? I have a 6.75 wrist I'm looking at the strap version in black. I'm not sure if it will look too big.

    • @rossdev
      @rossdev 3 місяці тому

      @@rajm6494 I’ve owned two different models, one on rubber strap and one on bracelet. Both are very comfortable options, in my opinion it doesn’t look a big watch on the strap, but you might find it a little top heavy due to the case thickness. I would recommend going to a store to try them both out if possible.

  • @KrispyCrem3
    @KrispyCrem3 15 днів тому +1

    39.5 has better proportions, but why does no one mention that Omega churn out too many variations?

  • @andrewwheeler8591
    @andrewwheeler8591 8 місяців тому +1

    Got the wrists and hand size for the 43 so got one and love it! Regards 😊

  • @CaptainSpud88
    @CaptainSpud88 29 днів тому +1

    I have the 43 with a smaller wrist on the wrist scale but it does wear smaller .. love my 43 I am just able to pull it off but that said it I get another color I may go for the 39 to see how that wears

  • @BRMIV
    @BRMIV 8 місяців тому +2

    I've had my eye on the 39.5 ever since I became aware of its existence and have been itching to see how it fits on my wrist. But they seem to be thin on the ground, and I have yet to see one in person. I thought when I saw the title of this video that you actually had one available, but alas not. I wonder whether Omega boutiques typically have them in stock? Might be worth a trip!

    • @brentmillertime8778
      @brentmillertime8778  8 місяців тому

      We were able to get this in very quickly for our customer. Not sure why we don't stock them more often.

    • @BRMIV
      @BRMIV 8 місяців тому

      I'd also welcome a smaller Seamaster 300. But the wait for that might be a bit longer! @@brentmillertime8778

  • @simonwright6882
    @simonwright6882 8 місяців тому +2

    My brother has the larger model and I'm going to purchase the smaller size after I sell my op41 to fund the purchase. Looking forward to it.

    • @brentmillertime8778
      @brentmillertime8778  8 місяців тому +2

      Black or blue dial for you?!

    • @simonwright6882
      @simonwright6882 8 місяців тому +2

      @@brentmillertime8778
      My brother has the black but I prefer the blue.

    • @brentmillertime8778
      @brentmillertime8778  8 місяців тому +2

      @@simonwright6882 Both are great, but I'd be going blue myself.

  • @KNHVICKY
    @KNHVICKY 8 місяців тому +1

    Outstanding exhibition ❤

  •  3 місяці тому +1

    1:49 Elvis Presley 🤣

  • @alanturner7654
    @alanturner7654 8 місяців тому +1

    Have the 43 well pleased may have to give the 39 ago though

  • @Tuneitupful
    @Tuneitupful 8 місяців тому +1

    Great review Rob

  • @devilmaycry0917
    @devilmaycry0917 Місяць тому +1

    39.5 summer blue

  • @davidwright9139
    @davidwright9139 6 місяців тому +1

    Good info thanks 👍

  • @krivokoraivan8941
    @krivokoraivan8941 8 місяців тому

    Брент, спасибо за ваши сравнительные обзоры!
    Что касается самих часов, то, мне кажется, это ужасно непропорциональные часы. В особенности модель с 39 мм. корпусом. Я не понимаю, зачем Омега делает их настолько толстыми. Всего-то надо отказаться от прозрачной задней крышки и уменьшить водозащиту до 300 метров.

  • @Vox-Populi
    @Vox-Populi 8 місяців тому +1

    They're both beautiful, but also a bit too thick for me.

  • @lgroves336
    @lgroves336 4 місяці тому

    39.5 from Omega website.
    Reference
    215.30.40.20.03.002
    Between lugs Open Case Measurement Modal
    19 mm
    Lug‑to‑lug Open Case Measurement Modal
    45.6 mm
    Thickness Open Case Measurement Modal
    14.2 mm
    Case diameter Open Case Measurement Modal
    39.5 mm
    Case
    Steel
    Dial color
    Blue
    Crystal
    Domed scratch‑resistant sapphire crystal with anti‑reflective treatment on both sides

  • @williamrizzo1285
    @williamrizzo1285 8 місяців тому +1

    I would pick the 43, I have the 43mm world timer.

  • @bigmacdaddy1234
    @bigmacdaddy1234 8 місяців тому +4

    The useless helium escape valve needs to go. It ruins an otherwise perfect watch.

    • @Mark-lj1dj
      @Mark-lj1dj 8 місяців тому

      I like it 🤷‍♂️

    • @etpourtant7512
      @etpourtant7512 7 місяців тому +2

      According to me, the helium escape brings balance to the watch.

    • @bigmacdaddy1234
      @bigmacdaddy1234 7 місяців тому

      @@etpourtant7512 Rolex doesn't have it and last time I checked it was the most balanced watch around.

    • @etpourtant7512
      @etpourtant7512 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@@bigmacdaddy1234 Yes but the submariner does have a crown guard, which changes the overall shape and balance of the watch, I think.
      The Omega Planet Ocean has a big crown with no guard which could look a little weird without the presence of the second crown. My 2 cents.
      But, with or without this helium escape crown, the Planet Ocean is a very nice looking watch.

  • @maitrehg
    @maitrehg 2 місяці тому

    43 is the way to go for men.

  • @martinweyden40
    @martinweyden40 8 місяців тому +8

    Omega must make there watches thinner.

    • @Anonymouslyme1
      @Anonymouslyme1 8 місяців тому +1

      Omega must make all its watches thinner!

    • @Edrox5000
      @Edrox5000 8 місяців тому +1

      I generally agree, however the 39.5mm PO feels appropriately thick given its capability. It’s no thicker than the original PO, sea dweller or the OG Pelagos.