For now, it is impossible to match the onboard with every angle as the camera FOV in-game (onboards cannot be edited in LMU) differs from the one used IRL.
A cool thing to watch here is the way that front right wheel reacts to the bumps incredibly similar, and in the same locations, between the 2 videos. Most noticeable is at 0:49 in the video out of Piratella, just after the left kink of 10 down the hill before Acque Minerali. The bump causes the cars to react exactly the same in the 2 videos. Pretty cool.
LMU is the most realistic sim right now. Unfortunately some people don’t realize just how slippery these cars can be on cold tires and don’t bother to warm them up - then complain about the handling based on a grand total of 2 laps of driving.
@@coyy9106did we watch the same video? To me it seems pretty realistic, from tyre deformation, car rotation, suspension compression/rebound, laser scan of the track, and overall laptime. Which sim comes close to this level of detail? Please enlighten me?
Mmmm... Not really. I'd argue rFactor 2 is more realistic in terms of "feeling". I tested it myself on my wheel, (Moza KS w/ Moza R9 DD wheel base) and rFactor tends to have a clearer sense of limit. I tested this with two "similar" cars with the Porsche RSR in both LMU and rF2 over at Imola with 2 warm-up laps and 25 racing laps. (With mistakes because I'm not that great) Though rF2 has the older car but they're similar in terms of handling. rFactor 2, like I said earlier, is better in terms of giving you the feeling of "on the limit". The I can feel it in the wheel when I'm starting to lose grip and it's definitely a prominent feeling. In LMU, it's a bit more subtle. There's definitely that "on the limit of grip" feeling but it's not as prominent as on rF2. But I can't say whether one is more realistic than the other. I've never driven an actual racing car before, let alone go past 150km/h on corners. Of course, this could just be a bug and Studio 397 can definitely fix or improve it.
That’s the reason why 47 euros for the season pass are absolutely ok. It’s insane, how accurate lmu is. And people who are moaning about the price have no idea how much work s397 put into the physics.
@@s3nTer and the employees live from what? It’s small team and they have to pay licenses. Ams2 is far away from ready, and they already brought a lot of dlcs. The multiplayer is way worse than the multiplayer in lmu. If S397 wouldn’t have brought the sim as early access, they would’ve got the first shitstorm. They have to earn money to develop the sim. It’s that easy. I wonder why so many people don’t understand that. Since the licensing of the lndycars, they got a lot of shitstorms. And it simply doesn’t stop. Why not complaining about 15 euros per track and an addition monthly fee to get access to the content you bought in iracing?
@@ScholliUlz people like you are to blame for all this bullcrap that we are having right now with early access, microtransactions, nfts etc. If I was about to open the restaurant and charge people for the food which I don't have products for it yet with a promise that someday they will definitely get it but pay me now, that's okay? Get your product ready and then ship it.
@@s3nTer The metaphor is pointless. And if you want to blame other people, maybe start with yourself. To your metaphor: Iracing has been missing the ingredient for rain for 13 years. The ingredient for a good netcode is still missing. Raceroom has only been filled with content for years. It has hardly been improved. I have already talked about ams2. ACC in v1 had a lousy netcode and a lousy tire model. V1 was catastrophic. And is a lmu supposed to be to blame for that now? We sim Racer are a fan of a niche product. And in a niche, companies are struggling to survive. Please just consider the fact. Thank you.
Indeed! The developers are really putting all they dedication on Le Mans Ultimate, we can almost feel the smell of burning rubber. The sound departement its one of the best things in the sim, specially on the cockpit camera. Best early acess game that I bought on Steam 🙂
honestly has there ever been this level of parity between irl onboards and sim? it's astonishing. the Overtake_gg LMU vs iRacing vs IRL at Le Mans video also shows what to my eye is an unprecedented level of parity between IRL onboards and a game. Presumably bespoke models created by racing teams are closer to 1:1
Yeah just don't put other cars on track, don't change the weather or time of day and don't look too closely at side track details. Ah and don't forget to have a coffee preparing each time you want to lead something. Geesh... This games looks and it feels good, if we were in 2015... just don't look at details, don't look at the car in front of you having 3D object poping in and out of existence within 2m. Don't or your experience will be ruined for ever.... arrr....
@@kevinhadj82 what the hell are you on about? The game looks better than iracing, as it's not from 2008 with a yellow tint, or ACC with it's idiotic UE4 that has non-existent AA. Loading times are long only once, until the track and cars are cached locally, then it's 30 seconds to a minute on an SSD and 90 seconds on a solid HDD. The tyres and suspension on ACC are beyond broken and are outside of the realms of reality, while the same cars on iR are 2-4 seconds a lap faster, whereas I am within a tenth of Fuoco with properly driving, not slowing myself down on purpose (I know this as 99% of people cannot crack 29s on LMU on Imola). I know your comment is bait, but find other purpose in life, other than spreading something that is blatantly not true, as per the video. Have a nice day.
@@NusPojava You clearly have reading issue or just comprehension, which is fine. Not sure why you come forward about ACC and iR. Did not mention any comparison with those games. Also did not talk about the physic engine, it is a sim, we can discuss it though and talk about the lack of feeling on the front and the lack of feeling on the rear. But no, I was just looking at this piece of technique crap that is sold to us in 2024 as early access with DLC, despite being a spinoff of rF2 in which half the content existed already and re-using both its physic and graphic engine. 🕊🕊🕊
@@kevinhadj82 ACC is a spinoff to AC, which is a spinoff to netKar Pro, iRacing is a spinoff to NR2003, AMS2 is a spinoff to PC2. You see how convoluted that logic is? And the content that came from rF2, has been heavily reworked to resemble nothing of it, but I guess you have already made up your mind. Talking to a brick wall rarely results in different opinions. And as for the "lack of front end feeling", they can easily add artificial forces, but guess what? The cars are based on the real deal, and on the real cars, the front is numb. I know this, as Ferrari engineers from the 499P have confirmed this first hand. My suggestion, get good.
every minor detail is present in the track, from the sponsors, to the gravel traps, to the kerbs... if only codemasters tried as hard as LMU, this game is awesome
It's funny, when I first saw LMU I didn't think much of it since it had to compete with like ACC and iRacing. And now I see it's far better than I initially gave it credit for.
Crazy. Only thing I noticed wrong is the arrows in the wrong place on pit entry (showing the split). On game they have been placed on the side of the barrier rather than the end.
Not realistic enough. The reflection of the trees in turn 5 should be 3cm to the left, and the green of the kerbs should be 2% less saturated. 2/10 (Every hater comment here.)
@@asd5442-k3j official system recommended specs - Graphics: GeForce GTX 1070 8 GB, Radeon RX 580 8GB so I have enough but the game is still not optimized enough
This game requires a powerful CPU (Ryzen x3d), 32GB RAM and a powerful GPU with 16GB vRAM (e.g. 7900gre). Don't count on optimization. There will be no optimization
A cool thing to watch here is the way that front right wheel reacts to the bumps incredibly similar, and in the same locations, between the 2 videos. Most noticeable is at 0:49 in the video out of Piratella, just after the left kink of 10 down the hill before Acque Minerali. The bump causes the cars to react exactly the same in the 2 videos. Pretty cool.
They did good job making this game but I hope they do something about optimization ;(
LMU is the most realistic sim right now. Unfortunately some people don’t realize just how slippery these cars can be on cold tires and don’t bother to warm them up - then complain about the handling based on a grand total of 2 laps of driving.
It’s not the most realistic. It only has the most realistic Hypercar tyre model, on cold tyres.
That does not make it state of the art in simracing.
@@coyy9106did we watch the same video? To me it seems pretty realistic, from tyre deformation, car rotation, suspension compression/rebound, laser scan of the track, and overall laptime.
Which sim comes close to this level of detail? Please enlighten me?
@@coyy9106 LMU has unquestionably the best physic on the market. Anyone who says otherwise is a fool or a liar.
Mmmm... Not really. I'd argue rFactor 2 is more realistic in terms of "feeling". I tested it myself on my wheel, (Moza KS w/ Moza R9 DD wheel base) and rFactor tends to have a clearer sense of limit. I tested this with two "similar" cars with the Porsche RSR in both LMU and rF2 over at Imola with 2 warm-up laps and 25 racing laps. (With mistakes because I'm not that great) Though rF2 has the older car but they're similar in terms of handling.
rFactor 2, like I said earlier, is better in terms of giving you the feeling of "on the limit". The I can feel it in the wheel when I'm starting to lose grip and it's definitely a prominent feeling. In LMU, it's a bit more subtle. There's definitely that "on the limit of grip" feeling but it's not as prominent as on rF2. But I can't say whether one is more realistic than the other. I've never driven an actual racing car before, let alone go past 150km/h on corners.
Of course, this could just be a bug and Studio 397 can definitely fix or improve it.
Driveclub has realistic graphics
That’s the reason why 47 euros for the season pass are absolutely ok. It’s insane, how accurate lmu is. And people who are moaning about the price have no idea how much work s397 put into the physics.
Fr
its ok if the game was fully released but its an EARLY ACCESS title
@@s3nTer and the employees live from what? It’s small team and they have to pay licenses.
Ams2 is far away from ready, and they already brought a lot of dlcs. The multiplayer is way worse than the multiplayer in lmu.
If S397 wouldn’t have brought the sim as early access, they would’ve got the first shitstorm. They have to earn money to develop the sim. It’s that easy. I wonder why so many people don’t understand that.
Since the licensing of the lndycars, they got a lot of shitstorms. And it simply doesn’t stop.
Why not complaining about 15 euros per track and an addition monthly fee to get access to the content you bought in iracing?
@@ScholliUlz people like you are to blame for all this bullcrap that we are having right now with early access, microtransactions, nfts etc.
If I was about to open the restaurant and charge people for the food which I don't have products for it yet with a promise that someday they will definitely get it but pay me now, that's okay?
Get your product ready and then ship it.
@@s3nTer The metaphor is pointless. And if you want to blame other people, maybe start with yourself.
To your metaphor: Iracing has been missing the ingredient for rain for 13 years. The ingredient for a good netcode is still missing. Raceroom has only been filled with content for years. It has hardly been improved. I have already talked about ams2. ACC in v1 had a lousy netcode and a lousy tire model. V1 was catastrophic. And is a lmu supposed to be to blame for that now?
We sim Racer are a fan of a niche product. And in a niche, companies are struggling to survive. Please just consider the fact. Thank you.
This is awesome!
Kudos to the whole team, this is great stuff!
@@LeMansUltimate I just aimed for Fuoco's laptime. The rest is up to you guys.
The similarities are incredible, today we have a very close IRL experience with LMU.
Indeed! The developers are really putting all they dedication on Le Mans Ultimate, we can almost feel the smell of burning rubber. The sound departement its one of the best things in the sim, specially on the cockpit camera. Best early acess game that I bought on Steam 🙂
honestly has there ever been this level of parity between irl onboards and sim? it's astonishing. the Overtake_gg LMU vs iRacing vs IRL at Le Mans video also shows what to my eye is an unprecedented level of parity between IRL onboards and a game. Presumably bespoke models created by racing teams are closer to 1:1
Right now this is the best sim out there. Physics, sound and immersion are beyond amazing!
Yeah just don't put other cars on track, don't change the weather or time of day and don't look too closely at side track details. Ah and don't forget to have a coffee preparing each time you want to lead something. Geesh... This games looks and it feels good, if we were in 2015... just don't look at details, don't look at the car in front of you having 3D object poping in and out of existence within 2m. Don't or your experience will be ruined for ever.... arrr....
@@kevinhadj82 what the hell are you on about? The game looks better than iracing, as it's not from 2008 with a yellow tint, or ACC with it's idiotic UE4 that has non-existent AA.
Loading times are long only once, until the track and cars are cached locally, then it's 30 seconds to a minute on an SSD and 90 seconds on a solid HDD.
The tyres and suspension on ACC are beyond broken and are outside of the realms of reality, while the same cars on iR are 2-4 seconds a lap faster, whereas I am within a tenth of Fuoco with properly driving, not slowing myself down on purpose (I know this as 99% of people cannot crack 29s on LMU on Imola).
I know your comment is bait, but find other purpose in life, other than spreading something that is blatantly not true, as per the video.
Have a nice day.
@@NusPojava You clearly have reading issue or just comprehension, which is fine. Not sure why you come forward about ACC and iR. Did not mention any comparison with those games. Also did not talk about the physic engine, it is a sim, we can discuss it though and talk about the lack of feeling on the front and the lack of feeling on the rear.
But no, I was just looking at this piece of technique crap that is sold to us in 2024 as early access with DLC, despite being a spinoff of rF2 in which half the content existed already and re-using both its physic and graphic engine. 🕊🕊🕊
@@kevinhadj82 ACC is a spinoff to AC, which is a spinoff to netKar Pro, iRacing is a spinoff to NR2003, AMS2 is a spinoff to PC2. You see how convoluted that logic is? And the content that came from rF2, has been heavily reworked to resemble nothing of it, but I guess you have already made up your mind. Talking to a brick wall rarely results in different opinions.
And as for the "lack of front end feeling", they can easily add artificial forces, but guess what? The cars are based on the real deal, and on the real cars, the front is numb. I know this, as Ferrari engineers from the 499P have confirmed this first hand. My suggestion, get good.
@@kevinhadj82typical Kevin…
That sound is great. Love when sims actually take the timento make the car sound as close as possible to the real thing. Im impressed 👍
I noticed that they finally added the social media tags on the Ferrari, nice little touch that
Nice comparison, well done!
every minor detail is present in the track, from the sponsors, to the gravel traps, to the kerbs... if only codemasters tried as hard as LMU, this game is awesome
Unbelievable! LMU is the burner!
Well they really cooked on that one
It's funny, when I first saw LMU I didn't think much of it since it had to compete with like ACC and iRacing. And now I see it's far better than I initially gave it credit for.
Man I thought I could pick out the difference with the side-by-side. I was wrong
What truly amazing is how the real world camera has zero jiggle. Never seen that before.
Nice thanks for sharing 🙏🏻
as already said: you‘re freaking absolute amazing!
and i just realized i forgot to drop you the e-mail 😮
Crazy. Only thing I noticed wrong is the arrows in the wrong place on pit entry (showing the split). On game they have been placed on the side of the barrier rather than the end.
Not realistic enough. The reflection of the trees in turn 5 should be 3cm to the left, and the green of the kerbs should be 2% less saturated. 2/10 (Every hater comment here.)
Not everyone is perfect at everything.
I Wish GT7 can sound this accurate
there are no imola in gran turismo 7 and there are no ferrari 499p in gt7
And drive this accurate.. GT7 is far from being a sim
Wow 🤯
Should've panned the audio for the final bit
I didn't even think of that. I'll do it for the next comparison I do.
@@NusPojava good video though
They really cookin with this game right now. Just need some more optimizing to do.
Am waiting for vr
i have 3070 and to this day the game still lags sometimes
Your card only has 8gb vram. That's too little for this game
@@asd5442-k3j official system recommended specs - Graphics: GeForce GTX 1070 8 GB, Radeon RX 580 8GB so I have enough but the game is still not optimized enough
RTX on is the bottom
This game sucks. When I get into my SIM cockpit, I can't feel the G-Force. Well, I'm off to play the real thing, GT7 and ACC. 😂
i want historic DLCs
Me too.
Currently 8 people watching on twitch #deadbeforerelease
A true metric of performance is Twitch viewership, on a Wednesday, 10 AM, mid-holiday season. I agree.
Comments like this are not helping anyone.
Wait till end of year when they have GT3‘s - LMU is great and i think they will get a good and big player base when they keep doing what they do
@opressed: such a loser. You’ve no idea, just how damn good LMU is.
Looks like I hit a weak spot
game sucks dont buy it
I'd say you're spelling sucks as well. Don't read this. Oops, too late. Great game.
the game isnt realistic enough :(
it happens
You do realise one is recorded on a reference microphone and the other a cheap onboard camera and then compressed for streaming?
@@brentonedwards i watched without sound, i have auditions problems.
i was talkin bout the car handlingr
@@brentonedwards it's bait, stop falling for it.
No gforces 🤷
This game requires a powerful CPU (Ryzen x3d), 32GB RAM and a powerful GPU with 16GB vRAM (e.g. 7900gre). Don't count on optimization. There will be no optimization
???? im running the game on an amd fx6300 and 32gb 1600mhz ram, and a 1650 wtf are you talking about