Fun fact : the revolution kickstarted the French occupation of Algeria. You see, Charles X had sent an expeditionnary corps to put down the Bey of Algiers, wich was something of a semi-independant pirate state at the time. The whole thing, based on a flimsy pretext, was mostly a symbolic show of force. However, the revolution happened during the taking of the city, and the general didn't really know what to do. This was supposed to be a hit and run, but here he was with a giant army in a foreign land while the government he served had been toppled. He refused to swear alliegeance to the new regime, and began to take over neighbouring cities to organize his troops for an eventual confrontation. It never came, as he was dismissed of his commandment and another general was simply sent to Algiers in order to take the army in charge. Clauzel, the new guy, then turned the expedition in a occupation force and proceeded to attack territories southward, both as a mean to get some easy victories in the name of the new king, and as a way of keeping troops with dubious loyalties away from France. And thus began 130 years of very relative fun.
TheFiresloth fun fact : algeria was created by the french and such a country did not exist before. This land that later was unified under the french was originally composed as independent cities and tribes..
@@ritaDas-xl4kz Even if Napoleon III failed the mexican war and the Franco-prussian war (which was sort of arranged by the republicans to regain power in france but whatever), he also massively industrialised and urbanised France, made the Paris we know today, and created the "Roman National" to unite the french. He was also supported by (for real) the majority of the population, although this majority decreased over time. He still had the support of basically half the french populationnear the end of his reign. So, in the end, it was not so bad, he made France fertile for a nice republic. And then 1940 lol.
@@jedi86tm I said not so great as his uncle hut i did not say that he was not great,and he did great things,for example france had a revolution problem and some areas would just go to riot for smallest reasons he fixed this by making broader streets to disperse the rioters easily by cavalry.
Funny that France's longest continuous republican regime (Third) was thought as yet another provisional thing before reverting back to monarchy. The French never really bought that much into republicanism and even now their republic looks eeringly monarchichal.
@@yarpen26 Yeah... no. Since 1792, the spirit of republicanism has shaped France and made it undetachable from the idea of the Republic. Granted, the figure of the "providential man" who rises to power to take charge and restore order is still strong, but historical characters like Napoleon Bonaparte or Charles de Gaulle were seen as the Republic's perpetuator - at least at first. After the 1880s, most of the French population accepted the Republic and moved past monarchism, even with some members of the nationalist far right. As for the current Fifth Republic, its institutions do facilitate the individual power of the president and the executive branch, but that was due both to the immense instability of the Fourth Republic, which saw an average of two governments per year, and to the personality of its founder, De Gaulle, who was a former monarchist and had a very personal and authoritative way of governance. Due to De Gaulle's popularity as leader of Free France during the war, and the stability this new regime brought in 1958 after an attempted coup by generals in Algeria, the population accepted it. However, ever since the events of May 1968 and De Gaulle's resignation a year later, not to mention the economic crisis in the 1970s and 1980s, the form of the Republic and its institutions have been the subject of criticism, mainly from the radical and far left who consider it too vertical and non-democratic. Polls show the majority of the population isn't all that attached to this Republic. So I really don't see how you can ay that the French aren't republican. They're just quite demanding toward their government.
@Bangbabangbabangbang The muttonchopped man with the top hat and 1820s style suit, beside the female,figure ought to have taught you otherwise, likewise for the fallen soldier's shako (a tall cylindrical cap worn by military personnel from circa 1800 til the mid-19th century) down in the lower right corner.
@Marcus Drake *Charles X's motto should be "I didn't learn anything". Contrary to the popular phrase, the Bourbons did actually learn from the revolution. Louis XVIII was actually a fairly moderate and reasonable monarch, who allowed France to have a constitution (well a chart, but in practice it was pretty much the same thing) and generally had a pretty hands-off approach to politics. It's just too bad Charles X was a complete fool who didn't learn shit from the Revolution (probably because he packed up and left France even before people started losing their heads, during the more moderate part of the French Revolution).
@@powderedwiglouis1238 The real problem with Charles was that, like I mentioned, he was not present during the events of 1790-1792 like his brothers were. As a result he learned nothing from how the Revolution transpired and was against even the slightest bit of liberal reform. Stubbornly wanting to maintain absolutism in a France that would never accept a return to the Ancien Regime. Louis XVIII supposedly spent the last of his days hoping he would outlive Charles because he knew he would destroy the entire political system he had waited and worked for so long to create. I imagine he must have been quite depressed the day he finally croaked, knowing that he would die before Charles. Literally the only credit I can give Charles X is that he knew when he was beaten. In 1830 he could theoretically have raised an army and tried to retake Paris, he still had support from much of the rural population. But luckily, he probably didn't want to be known for butchering his own people and left for Austria.
@@marvelfannumber1 True, that motto applies more to Charles X. The latter has many similarities to James II/VII who also fled after succeeding his brother and trying to impose his own will on the country.
0:10 Bit of a mistake, Louis XVIII's family might have been unpopular, but the King himself was relatively popular by the end of his reign, due to him being a moderate monarch and abiding by the Charter of 1815 (Frances first *successful* monarchical constitution, Napoleon doesn't really count) and allowing some popular freedoms. This is in contrast to his brother, the Comte d'Artois (Count of Artois) who ended up becoming one of Frances most unpopular Kings (you can figure out who he is by yourself)
Fun fact when Charles ordered the ordinances neither him nor polignac notified the army to be ready for putting down any unrest meaning that the army and its commanders that weren't in Algeria found out in the morning news papers edition which allowed the parisians to organize themselves better in order to resist the ordinances
I’m just here to say that I am so appreciative of the work you produce. Regardless of how often you upload, I always find myself excited seeing a notification for a video of yours. Keep up the good work
I think this and the 1832 Great Reform Act in the UK are two examples of how the so-called Metternich System and 'Pre-March' Europe were far from frozen in political strife. People never gave up on what the French Revolution had promised, indeed in Spain having lost the Civil War kicked off by the French Occupation, the Liberals ended up becoming a dominant force in Spanish politics from about 1830 to 1874. In France 1830 and 1848 stopped because the Bourbons tried to tamp down on constitutional monarchy and the franchise. Revolution was just about averted in the UK because preemptory repression and key concessions were given at the same time to stop a social explosion.
Not only still alive; he helped lead the Chamber of Deputies to solidify their authority against Napoleon after the defeat at Waterloo. Joseph Bonaparte had attempted to rally the chamber to stand by their emperor, but LaFayette countered that the nation had followed its emperor across the better part of the globe and had "nothing to show for it but 2 million dead Frenchmen."
Mr History Matters Sir… you are probably one of the genuinely hilarious personalities I’ve seen on UA-cam. I would love to see you direct some episodes of Blackadder or Monty Python. Shine on, you magnificent bastard. Much love
Huh, I didn't study about this revolution. Maybe because as you said, it is overshadowed by the two greatest one. But it's always fascinating how France had such a history. Love the content!
*cough* Les Miserables, one of the few reasons its studied was because Hugo was in Paris for pretty much the entire thing and couldn't help but guilt trip the nobility like he did for Notre-Dame de Pairs. If he wasn't there it would've been a historical footnote, because really a minor insurrection in Paris? Never heard of that happening. The book/play/musical/movie is ostensibly about the June Rebellion of 1832 (they didn't even go 2 whole years), but in true Hugo fashion, he doesn't shut the fuck up about the July Rebellion. Some people say its glossed over, those people are wrong (or didn't read the book), just Hugo sucks at getting the references right. Also Valjean /is basically/ Victor Hugo, a bunch of things Hugo did and saw are what Valjean does in the book, including saving a prostitute and a man being arrested over stealing a loaf of bread. Hugo didn't do any sword fighting to save orphaned peasant children though.
Probably because it was too dependent on Paris, making it easy to mess up affairs by taking the capital, without Paris having enough counter measures to make it secure.
@@caiawlodarski5339 France before the Revolution did not have a "flag", what you're referring to is the Royal Standard which was a white field with yellow fleur-de-lis. The royal standard wasn't a national flag in the modern sense, it was only raised in the presence of the Royal Family. This Royal Standard was restored, with the same design and use during the Restoration. The State Flag of the Kingdom of France before the Revolution on the other hand was a pure white flag, which once again became the state flag in 1815. The Bourbon Restoration did not create any new flags, it merely restored the old ones.
Marie Antoinette's daughter, Princess Marie Therese, managed to survive the Reign of Terror: she was lucky that women hadn't been allowed to succeed to the French throne, so unlike her brother Louis XVII she presented no threat to the Republic. As an emigre she married Charles X's oldest son, her first cousin Prince Louis Antoine. (I know--yuk!) So she was in line to become Queen of France like her mother! The House of Orleans was a cadet branch of the House of Bourbon; Bourbon a cadet branch of Valois; Valois a cadet branch of Capet.
It's always fun to see the Doctor appear in these historical videos because, you know, he was probably there somewhere. I also appreciate that it's a Doctor that I recognize. I've seen him in older (pre-9th/Eccelstein) episodes, and he's often so colorful that I'd probably guess it was him, anyway, but I like 9 and 10, so yay!
And the next revolution, in 1832, will be the one of "Les Miserables" of Victor Hugo, known as the most famous and one of the best litterature work of France's History. Thanks to "giver" for the correction.
@@090giver090 oh indeed my mistake, I was remembering the passage where Marius's grandpa was talking about "two other revolutions in the same century". My mind must be confused. Allow me to correct that.
"The ghost of revolution, Still prowls the Paris streets, Down all the restless centuries It wanders incomplete." "The Palace of Versailles" by Al Stewart
Fun context: November 1830 - uprising in Poland and Lithuania. In 1831 cholera pandemics spreads from these lands to Europe (general Karl von Clausewitz dies from it establishing a sanitary cordon in Prussia that had to prevent fleeing rebels who lost the uprising, Russian commander has died from cholera, too). Somehow it reminds events that are currently going on around the world. In May 1830 in Sweden has been a very first non-British yacht club named KSSS (another Royal...) established. :)
Interestingly, the mainline Bourbons and Orléans families both live on as Louis XX and Jean d'Orléans, Count of Paris. Louis XX is a fairly unappreciated argentinian banker who has openly stated that he has zero interests in politics and doesn't want to rule France, but still holds his claim for some reason I can't quite fathom. He seems rather aloof to french life and thinks of the monarchy as some british-style decorum rather than a political force. Jean d'Orléans inherited the claim from his father Henri d'Orléans who died at 85 some months ago only. He has open political views (conservative ones) and holds his claim and participates in the political life regularly. Which, to be honest, is the proper way of offering a monarchy to the french. The french have little to no interest in the return of the monarchy, but they certainly will not seek one for the pomp of it. Unless they see a reasonable argument to the benefits of an unmovable leader and a hereditary claim to France, they probably will not do a thing for any kings claimants. Which leads me to see the mainline Bourbons as idealists of some sort of untouchable upper monarchy which does not dirty its name in politician politics, and the Orléans as more in touch with the french people and the political reality. Idealists and realists. The culture of both these families seems to have been frozen in time since the 19th century. I suppose that's what makes a family of Kings, they don't flip flop.
Except Louis XX is Spanish not Argentinian, he is a cousin of the current King of Spain Felipe VI. But he speaks French with a Spanish accent and always says he is available if the people want the monarchy.
Louis does not have a legitimate claim to the throne. He is a Spanish Bourbon, a branch that renounced its claim after the War of Spanish Succession. The Legitimist claim did legally pass to the Orléans since then. Therefore the Count of Paris is the only real contender.
Imagine being the British, enjoying being the Strongest World Power after beating the French after 7 tries and the French have a Revolution that leads to a Republic that leads to a Empire under another Napoleon.
Got to have been frustrating to the other leaders of Europe to see their work uprooted again. I think by this point, most European nations all agreed after this revolution that France will forever be a eternal hot bed for liberal ideas.
The crazy thing is their are ex military guys in France now talking about having another revolution. It is like no one in that country has learned from history yet. 😔
@@johnhughes9878 If their former colonies in Afrika switch to a unified currency like many are planning too. That civil war might happen because without their economies France's economy will noise dive into the toilette.
Fun fact : the revolution kickstarted the French occupation of Algeria.
You see, Charles X had sent an expeditionnary corps to put down the Bey of Algiers, wich was something of a semi-independant pirate state at the time. The whole thing, based on a flimsy pretext, was mostly a symbolic show of force.
However, the revolution happened during the taking of the city, and the general didn't really know what to do. This was supposed to be a hit and run, but here he was with a giant army in a foreign land while the government he served had been toppled. He refused to swear alliegeance to the new regime, and began to take over neighbouring cities to organize his troops for an eventual confrontation.
It never came, as he was dismissed of his commandment and another general was simply sent to Algiers in order to take the army in charge. Clauzel, the new guy, then turned the expedition in a occupation force and proceeded to attack territories southward, both as a mean to get some easy victories in the name of the new king, and as a way of keeping troops with dubious loyalties away from France.
And thus began 130 years of very relative fun.
It was not fun for anybody. But your commentary is interesting
@@franciscomm7675 It was fun for the French kkkkkk
@@guilhermevieira8756 ahahaha cuidado piso molhado
LOVE your comments "realtively" fun
TheFiresloth fun fact : algeria was created by the french and such a country did not exist before. This land that later was unified under the french was originally composed as independent cities and tribes..
"Every 60 seconds, a minute passes in Africa"
Still doesn't beat the Old saying of..
"Every 5 Minutes, A French Revolution Starts"
The top one is incorrect if were using metric time. But 1/2 is still good m8
And then one guy named Napoleon appeared, and somehow became Emperor.... Again.
Except the new one was not so great like his uncle
@@ritaDas-xl4kz Even if Napoleon III failed the mexican war and the Franco-prussian war (which was sort of arranged by the republicans to regain power in france but whatever), he also massively industrialised and urbanised France, made the Paris we know today, and created the "Roman National" to unite the french. He was also supported by (for real) the majority of the population, although this majority decreased over time. He still had the support of basically half the french populationnear the end of his reign. So, in the end, it was not so bad, he made France fertile for a nice republic. And then 1940 lol.
@@jedi86tm I said not so great as his uncle hut i did not say that he was not great,and he did great things,for example france had a revolution problem and some areas would just go to riot for smallest reasons he fixed this by making broader streets to disperse the rioters easily by cavalry.
@@jedi86tm Napoleon III was a better ruler than all the republican presidents and prime minister that came after him minus 1 or 2 like De Gaulle.
@@Okxyd Who would the second one be?
It always starts with random time in history and "someone of notice" is dead... Love it!
THUD!
So France, do you want to be a republic, a kingdom or an empire?
France: One of each, please.
Two of each, actually
Funny that France's longest continuous republican regime (Third) was thought as yet another provisional thing before reverting back to monarchy. The French never really bought that much into republicanism and even now their republic looks eeringly monarchichal.
*Yes
@@yarpen26 Yeah... no. Since 1792, the spirit of republicanism has shaped France and made it undetachable from the idea of the Republic. Granted, the figure of the "providential man" who rises to power to take charge and restore order is still strong, but historical characters like Napoleon Bonaparte or Charles de Gaulle were seen as the Republic's perpetuator - at least at first. After the 1880s, most of the French population accepted the Republic and moved past monarchism, even with some members of the nationalist far right.
As for the current Fifth Republic, its institutions do facilitate the individual power of the president and the executive branch, but that was due both to the immense instability of the Fourth Republic, which saw an average of two governments per year, and to the personality of its founder, De Gaulle, who was a former monarchist and had a very personal and authoritative way of governance. Due to De Gaulle's popularity as leader of Free France during the war, and the stability this new regime brought in 1958 after an attempted coup by generals in Algeria, the population accepted it. However, ever since the events of May 1968 and De Gaulle's resignation a year later, not to mention the economic crisis in the 1970s and 1980s, the form of the Republic and its institutions have been the subject of criticism, mainly from the radical and far left who consider it too vertical and non-democratic. Polls show the majority of the population isn't all that attached to this Republic. So I really don't see how you can ay that the French aren't republican. They're just quite demanding toward their government.
2 Kingdoms, 2 Empires, 5 Republics
You forget to mention that because of this Revolution, Eugene Delacroix painted the famous work of art: "Liberty leading the people".
@Bangbabangbabangbang Like any trilogy, the middle one is always the worst
@@Mercure250 not in LOTR triology
Aka The Famous Painting That is way to often wrongly attributed to the First Revolution
It has the lady in the yellow dress holding a French flag
@Bangbabangbabangbang The muttonchopped man with the top hat and 1820s style suit, beside the female,figure ought to have taught you otherwise, likewise for the fallen soldier's shako (a tall cylindrical cap worn by military personnel from circa 1800 til the mid-19th century) down in the lower right corner.
Oh yes, the Viva la Vida album cover
1815: La révolution est finie!
La France: Prennez ma bière
CB Wow I actually understood it even though I’m still starting to study French. Guess I’ll tell my teacher!
I got it and I don't know a word of french
Iddo Margalit-Friedman That certainly is difficult (really, not a joke)
@@iddomargalit-friedman3897 you have a French soul
@@hammermigg haha bravo! Félicitations!
The Bourbons motto should be "We never learn our lesson."
The Bourbons were (and still are) fairly liberal kings of Spain.
@Marcus Drake
*Charles X's motto should be "I didn't learn anything".
Contrary to the popular phrase, the Bourbons did actually learn from the revolution. Louis XVIII was actually a fairly moderate and reasonable monarch, who allowed France to have a constitution (well a chart, but in practice it was pretty much the same thing) and generally had a pretty hands-off approach to politics. It's just too bad Charles X was a complete fool who didn't learn shit from the Revolution (probably because he packed up and left France even before people started losing their heads, during the more moderate part of the French Revolution).
@@powderedwiglouis1238
The real problem with Charles was that, like I mentioned, he was not present during the events of 1790-1792 like his brothers were. As a result he learned nothing from how the Revolution transpired and was against even the slightest bit of liberal reform. Stubbornly wanting to maintain absolutism in a France that would never accept a return to the Ancien Regime.
Louis XVIII supposedly spent the last of his days hoping he would outlive Charles because he knew he would destroy the entire political system he had waited and worked for so long to create. I imagine he must have been quite depressed the day he finally croaked, knowing that he would die before Charles.
Literally the only credit I can give Charles X is that he knew when he was beaten. In 1830 he could theoretically have raised an army and tried to retake Paris, he still had support from much of the rural population. But luckily, he probably didn't want to be known for butchering his own people and left for Austria.
@@marvelfannumber1 True, that motto applies more to Charles X. The latter has many similarities to James II/VII who also fled after succeeding his brother and trying to impose his own will on the country.
@@powderedwiglouis1238 this is way the American revolution is better then the French revolution.
*Do you hear the people sing intensifies*
1832*
Hello yeah I was gonna say
You're thinking of the June Rebellion
I know, just a joke.
2:45
0:10 Bit of a mistake, Louis XVIII's family might have been unpopular, but the King himself was relatively popular by the end of his reign, due to him being a moderate monarch and abiding by the Charter of 1815 (Frances first *successful* monarchical constitution, Napoleon doesn't really count) and allowing some popular freedoms. This is in contrast to his brother, the Comte d'Artois (Count of Artois) who ended up becoming one of Frances most unpopular Kings (you can figure out who he is by yourself)
Could you do an episode about the Kalmar Union?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ja
wow, its in july the french love scheduling things on important anniversaries!
The revolution of 1848 which ended for good the monarchy in france was also in july i think.
Alas sadly not, that was in February, Vichy France was proclaimed in July 1940 though
How are you always the top comment?
@@minimantis5916 i have no clue honestly, i just try and post something vaugely witty pretty early
@@AncientAccounts You’re no longer the top comment.
Louis Philippe looks like a 1830s Elvis impersonator.
Or Elvis was a 20th century impersonator of Louis Phillipe =p Remember that the Pompadour was originally a 17th century women hairstyle!
Caramichael compare to the current Orléans pretender still hope he becomes king one day
Believe me, he had a way fatter neck than Elvis
Fun fact when Charles ordered the ordinances neither him nor polignac notified the army to be ready for putting down any unrest meaning that the army and its commanders that weren't in Algeria found out in the morning news papers edition which allowed the parisians to organize themselves better in order to resist the ordinances
Pp
I’m just here to say that I am so appreciative of the work you produce. Regardless of how often you upload, I always find myself excited seeing a notification for a video of yours. Keep up the good work
Same
Fun Fact: NON
I love when you do that, also i ordered a peak germany and a peak france mug!
Krasipol dude same! I hope mine get here quick.
Perhaps a video on the most forgotten war in American history, The Quasi War. It was a war at sea with America fighting against France.
@Wayne Hitchcock That wasn’t very “forgotten” though.
Does it translate into "the almost war"?
@Wayne Hitchcock Bacon is most necessary thing to fight over below freedom.
Funny thing is, that was one of the few times Napoleon was a peacemaker (or at least his government was).
Don't forget the 6th forgotten landing in dday
Band beach
Do you hear the people sing?
Singing a song of angry men...
When will Ten-Minute History
Make a ten minute video again?
C'mon, how has no one seen this comment? It's gold!
@@Edmonton-of2ec I have. I like it.
@@Edmonton-of2ec i like it too
comedy gold
Wrong revolution, Enjorlas.
I think this and the 1832 Great Reform Act in the UK are two examples of how the so-called Metternich System and 'Pre-March' Europe were far from frozen in political strife. People never gave up on what the French Revolution had promised, indeed in Spain having lost the Civil War kicked off by the French Occupation, the Liberals ended up becoming a dominant force in Spanish politics from about 1830 to 1874. In France 1830 and 1848 stopped because the Bourbons tried to tamp down on constitutional monarchy and the franchise. Revolution was just about averted in the UK because preemptory repression and key concessions were given at the same time to stop a social explosion.
It’s a great video to learn this part of french history. Even in France we don’t speak so much of this revolution
Choppy choppy
Red - the blood of angry men!
Black - the dark of ages past!
Red - a world about to dawn!
Black - the night that ends at last!
Wrong rebellion 😛
Unified Germany, not France
No Les Mis was about France
The June Rebellion wouldn’t take place until 1832
@@coledevlin3984 2:45
Lafayette was still alive? I'm impressed he managed to avoid getting guilottined
He was imprisoned in Austria for the majority of the Reign of Terror after being captured. He narrowly avoided being guillotined.
HOW old was he at this point?
@@williammerkel1410 mid 70s I think
Not only still alive; he helped lead the Chamber of Deputies to solidify their authority against Napoleon after the defeat at Waterloo.
Joseph Bonaparte had attempted to rally the chamber to stand by their emperor, but LaFayette countered that the nation had followed its emperor across the better part of the globe and had "nothing to show for it but 2 million dead Frenchmen."
Mr History Matters Sir… you are probably one of the genuinely hilarious personalities I’ve seen on UA-cam.
I would love to see you direct some episodes of Blackadder or Monty Python.
Shine on, you magnificent bastard.
Much love
1789: Chippity Choppity your head is now my property
1830: Chipp- All of France: Plz no
Huh, I didn't study about this revolution. Maybe because as you said, it is overshadowed by the two greatest one. But it's always fascinating how France had such a history. Love the content!
*cough* Les Miserables, one of the few reasons its studied was because Hugo was in Paris for pretty much the entire thing and couldn't help but guilt trip the nobility like he did for Notre-Dame de Pairs. If he wasn't there it would've been a historical footnote, because really a minor insurrection in Paris? Never heard of that happening. The book/play/musical/movie is ostensibly about the June Rebellion of 1832 (they didn't even go 2 whole years), but in true Hugo fashion, he doesn't shut the fuck up about the July Rebellion. Some people say its glossed over, those people are wrong (or didn't read the book), just Hugo sucks at getting the references right.
Also Valjean /is basically/ Victor Hugo, a bunch of things Hugo did and saw are what Valjean does in the book, including saving a prostitute and a man being arrested over stealing a loaf of bread. Hugo didn't do any sword fighting to save orphaned peasant children though.
Probably because it was too dependent on Paris, making it easy to mess up affairs by taking the capital, without Paris having enough counter measures to make it secure.
Things got a bit "guillotine-y" -- truly a laugh-out-loud line, despite its rather dark implications!
*CHOPPY*
*CHOPPY*
*CHOPPY*
Dude you could have made a video about the 1848 Hungarian revolution because it happened on this day 171 years ago
Just 1848 in general, since so much happened that year
@Nub93 Hungarian one would be kinda funny because it happened on March 15 and he could have uploaded it yesterday
And the 1867 sequel
Charles, having seen and knowing what happened to the previous king about 40 or so years earlier: "I am absolute, my power is divine."
I'm early, let me make a joke….
France's pre-tricolour flag.
Bourbon restoration flag*
@@jeffreychandra912
They're the same. The Bourbon Restoration merely restored France's pre-revolutionary "flags".
@@caiawlodarski5339
France before the Revolution did not have a "flag", what you're referring to is the Royal Standard which was a white field with yellow fleur-de-lis. The royal standard wasn't a national flag in the modern sense, it was only raised in the presence of the Royal Family.
This Royal Standard was restored, with the same design and use during the Restoration.
The State Flag of the Kingdom of France before the Revolution on the other hand was a pure white flag, which once again became the state flag in 1815.
The Bourbon Restoration did not create any new flags, it merely restored the old ones.
It was also the flag that they apparently used at the beginning of World War II.
Whooosh
Thanks for the brief reference to the Les Miserables musical. 🎶
Really enjoying these short form episodes, keep it up friend 👌🏻
At first I thought you made a video on the 1830 Belgian independence. I'd love to see one of those!
I like the short video format because you can post more often but I also miss the longer versions.
00:29
Nice reference to the 1980s TV Sitcom and the awesome cover by The Blanks (sung at the end of a Scrubs episode). Love it.
French Restoration was an exact copy of English Restoration: Charles II - Louis XVIII, James II - Charles X, William III - Louis Philippe
Yeah except Louis Phillipe was *also* overthrown and so was his replacement.
Marie Antoinette's daughter, Princess Marie Therese, managed to survive the Reign of Terror: she was lucky that women hadn't been allowed to succeed to the French throne, so unlike her brother Louis XVII she presented no threat to the Republic. As an emigre she married Charles X's oldest son, her first cousin Prince Louis Antoine. (I know--yuk!) So she was in line to become Queen of France like her mother!
The House of Orleans was a cadet branch of the House of Bourbon; Bourbon a cadet branch of Valois; Valois a cadet branch of Capet.
This small videos are AWESOME!! The new rate of videos per week its amazing. Keep the hard working and the excellence quality 💪 Congrats People 😎
Country leader: breaths
French peasants:
Vive le revolution
Peasants were in monarchy side
@@fredericbiguenet147 non mon cher monsieur statistiquement parlant, une grosse partie ne l'était pas.
@@Bonclayr sources?
@@fredericbiguenet147 de ma vie passée, car j'ai vécue la révolution française dans mon autre vie
@@Bonclayr tu as promené des têtes au bout d'une pique ?
It's always fun to see the Doctor appear in these historical videos because, you know, he was probably there somewhere. I also appreciate that it's a Doctor that I recognize. I've seen him in older (pre-9th/Eccelstein) episodes, and he's often so colorful that I'd probably guess it was him, anyway, but I like 9 and 10, so yay!
In the beginning I was a bit worried about the switch to shorter video's but I have to say that I was wrong. Very interesting topic!
Are you planning/have done a video on 1848?
Gus Voorhees Seconded
0:18
*"No Peasants"*
*#PeasantsLivesMatter*
0:01 I swear, every History Matters video starts off like that.
*Insert important Figure head of said country*... is dead.
Your sound effects whenever someone dies is beyond hilarious for some reason
Just once I would lile to join a protest with a sign that says "Things aren't ideal"
Make a video about the Napoleonic Wars!
That was his very first video back in 2016
And the next revolution, in 1832, will be the one of "Les Miserables" of Victor Hugo, known as the most famous and one of the best litterature work of France's History.
Thanks to "giver" for the correction.
No, Les Mis was set during unsuccesfull 1832 June Rebellion. There is a reference to it in this video.
@@090giver090 oh indeed my mistake, I was remembering the passage where Marius's grandpa was talking about "two other revolutions in the same century". My mind must be confused. Allow me to correct that.
Although I think all historians agree that this revolution only became famous because of Hugo.
@@090giver090 2:45
A new video? I thought I was watching a video from last year! You're the best.
Your videos are awesome!!! Keep up the good job!
MOST UNDERRATED CHANNEL ON UA-cam
"Charles in charge" I actually laughed out loud. Bless
Although I miss the longer videos, the frequency of these shorter videos is very nice. Keep up the good work mate
I went scrolling through the videos and found I had missed an episode almost four years ago
"The ghost of revolution,
Still prowls the Paris streets,
Down all the restless centuries
It wanders incomplete."
"The Palace of Versailles" by Al Stewart
Fun context: November 1830 - uprising in Poland and Lithuania. In 1831 cholera pandemics spreads from these lands to Europe (general Karl von Clausewitz dies from it establishing a sanitary cordon in Prussia that had to prevent fleeing rebels who lost the uprising, Russian commander has died from cholera, too). Somehow it reminds events that are currently going on around the world. In May 1830 in Sweden has been a very first non-British yacht club named KSSS (another Royal...) established. :)
These videos are the highlight of my week!
"Charles in Charge" sign killed me
Interestingly, the mainline Bourbons and Orléans families both live on as Louis XX and Jean d'Orléans, Count of Paris.
Louis XX is a fairly unappreciated argentinian banker who has openly stated that he has zero interests in politics and doesn't want to rule France, but still holds his claim for some reason I can't quite fathom. He seems rather aloof to french life and thinks of the monarchy as some british-style decorum rather than a political force.
Jean d'Orléans inherited the claim from his father Henri d'Orléans who died at 85 some months ago only. He has open political views (conservative ones) and holds his claim and participates in the political life regularly. Which, to be honest, is the proper way of offering a monarchy to the french.
The french have little to no interest in the return of the monarchy, but they certainly will not seek one for the pomp of it. Unless they see a reasonable argument to the benefits of an unmovable leader and a hereditary claim to France, they probably will not do a thing for any kings claimants.
Which leads me to see the mainline Bourbons as idealists of some sort of untouchable upper monarchy which does not dirty its name in politician politics, and the Orléans as more in touch with the french people and the political reality.
Idealists and realists. The culture of both these families seems to have been frozen in time since the 19th century. I suppose that's what makes a family of Kings, they don't flip flop.
Except Louis XX is Spanish not Argentinian, he is a cousin of the current King of Spain Felipe VI. But he speaks French with a Spanish accent and always says he is available if the people want the monarchy.
Your forgetting the Bonapartes still exist.....
Let's assume that somehow Jean d'Orléan gets elected as the president, what do you think that would elicit out of the rest of the world?
@@512TheWolf512 nothing, he'd be president, not king and with no means to become one without a coup ;)
Louis does not have a legitimate claim to the throne. He is a Spanish Bourbon, a branch that renounced its claim after the War of Spanish Succession. The Legitimist claim did legally pass to the Orléans since then. Therefore the Count of Paris is the only real contender.
I was looking for a Les Mis reference, and I was not disappointed.
this is my second favorite revolution in france, as you mentioned, it's extremely underrated
Great vid but now you gotta do one about the 1848 revolutions across Europe
that shouldn't be a 3 minute video though.
OneAngryCat yeah you right
"The protesters turn to rioters and then the rioters into revolutionary" yup he mess up XD
I love your channel keep up the great stuff!
The French Revolution really hits home how amazing it is that Britain’s constitutional monarchy still exists.
This need to make a come back!
I'm surprised France had a king not named Louis
You should do the Paris commune next
Cheers, mate. 🙃👍
"Charles in charge" lol nice touch
(Puts on newly arrived 10 Minute History shirt)...Now...I am ready😁
The person who was the most unpopular Royal before the revolution (just a Bagatelle, right?) is now the king. That always ends well.
Next time I go to a protest I'm taking a "Things are not ideal" sign
Very good, congrats from France!
Thank you this was helpful for my AP euro assignment
It’s Wednesday, time for another revolution
Do you hear the people sing?
Singing a song of angry men?
It is the music of a people
Who will not be slaves again!
Would you ever do a video about the June rebellion of 1832? The one from Les Mis. I feel like there’s not much about that one.
Imagine being the British, enjoying being the Strongest World Power after beating the French after 7 tries and the French have a Revolution that leads to a Republic that leads to a Empire under another Napoleon.
This video was as big a surprise as the 1830 Revolution was to Charles X.
2:43 - Haha, yes, a Lemiz reference!
French ruler: I think I got this.
French people: I'm gonna do what's called a pro gamer move.
:30 “Charles in charge” we see what you did there.
Marquis de Lafayette... I recognize that name... Oh he was a general in the American revolution that's right.
General in the American revolution
"choppy choppy" is a great political statement
these videos are gonna save my ass for my history exam i swear
Got to have been frustrating to the other leaders of Europe to see their work uprooted again. I think by this point, most European nations all agreed after this revolution that France will forever be a eternal hot bed for liberal ideas.
Please do the seven years war!!!
Suggestion:
Begin of French conquest of Algeria (since 1830)
I have to admit that I wasn't familiar with this so I learned something new
I'm loving this new shorter video format along with the 10 minute ones.
I would like a series on the American Presidents or Irish Rebellions
I'm currently writing an episode on the Easter Rising so expect that next month.
love your work
Fun Fact...
Non...
Man, these videos are so great! xD
God this is the funniest way to learn history
Inventing the Bourbon biscuit (chocolate with chocolate creme filling) wasn't enough to save them.
If I was Charles X at 1:10 I too would be concerned about my personal space.
😂
Stable video 👍
The crazy thing is their are ex military guys in France now talking about having another revolution. It is like no one in that country has learned from history yet. 😔
Especially Macron
@@johnhughes9878 If their former colonies in Afrika switch to a unified currency like many are planning too. That civil war might happen because without their economies France's economy will noise dive into the toilette.
@@stevengreen9536 Could you imagine France becoming one of those countries in the EU that takes more money than it pays in?
@@Avghistorian77 It is possible.