As someone who got into apple a year ago, the reason why I got an iPhone was because you did a detailed explaination and it was a good purchase as the iPhone has a better performance than android does. This new product could change the way we interact in 10 years. If you’re reading this, this comment was posted on 15/06/2023 Good luck seeing this in 2033
@@kelsormjaquanit solves the problem of a movie room, for someone interested into getting a 50k atleast for a movie room, they could just get a living room and this, and bam, they saved 30k.
Apple said it will come up with a cheaper version. Honestly not all these features are needed. It was more for SHOW than anything else. To grab attention. It will probably get rid of some of the gimmicky stuff (like the external display all it does is consume power and add to the hefty price tag). Most people will not Care about that in the long run.
@@madjunir I’m not sure Apple will get rid of the iSight feature. It’s one of the most distinctive parts of the company has compared to other’s. I’m thinking Apple will figure out other ways (like time) to bring down the price. As manufacturing matures, the price will come down nicely.
@@madjunirthink they should rework the headset into a iPhone powered glasses that uses UWB and instead of camera-tracked motion, user need to wear a ring or use the Digital Crown or touch pad. Maybe use a projection display instead of microLED, sell it for $429 and everybody is gonna buy it. Give a thin factor to it and it will let VR reach into the majority.
It has been decades of research and hundreds of prototypes to arrive at this final product as well as the billions of dollars invested to create this product. The price is totally justified.
Did a somewhat better job of explaining everything than Apple did, and makes we want to try it even more. Still, I don't think I'll buy it, but who knows... EDIT: Yeah, it seems like an impressive and sophisticated improvement in the AR/VR realm, which still remains pretty niche. Movies and hopefully games seem pretty awesome in it. I don't think I'd want to wear it for computing (nor conversing!), even though the eye and hand tracking are pretty cool. That's also a hefty price to be used only occasionally, and the Quest 3 is due soon at one-fifth the price. Apple and others will keep iterating (if they don't outright flop!) and hopefully they'll become unobtrusive glasses or something.
I can see two possible short-term futures. Option 1: the Vision lineup totally flops and is discontinued before it ever becomes worth buying Option 2: the Vision Air 4 or whatever has a built-in 6 hour battery and costs under $2000 Either way, you’re better off waiting and not buying the $3500 model that needs an external battery to run for 2 hours
@@kelsormjaquanI would respectfully disagree, but appreciate your opinion. I’m looking forward to a cheaper version of this, since I’ve worked from home for many years and would love to be able to work with unlimited screens and not have to have multiple displays on my desk. Time will tell how well it goes, I suspect incredibly well knowing how Apple’s innovation trends after a 1st generation product. Will be interesting to see!
@@kelsormjaquanthis is definitely innovative because NO other vr/ar headset has as much tech inside as this one does. I’m not buying it because I really don’t need it lol and even if I could afford it I would only use it for watching anime.
@@ZzPolars Innovative? It IS innovative, I’ll give you that. Innovative=/=good and useful. It may have some really cool tech, and some areas where it’s genuinely better than your phone, but also *many* areas where it’s worse. And the things it offers that a phone can’t, absolutely are not necessary - just luxuries. Maybe a few years down the line there’ll be a Vision headset that’s a decent buy. Not the one that’s coming out next year.
true it is cheap to what your getting your getting two processer two displays with both 23 million pixel and these 3 displays one on the outside and two one the inside there's also 12 cameras too
It’s expensive right now because this model is just mainly for developers and the hardcore market so in a couple of years this can be used by the mass market.
I love how casually they made a LENTICULAR DISPLAY that displays the wearers' eyes from the appropriate angle. It's bloody phenomenal. And they clearly thought through the interface and uses. I look forward to seeing how this thing percolates through society and gets cheaper.
I was doubing about the price of the Apple Vision Pro, but this video made me understand why it is a reasonable price and all the amazing technology behind it.
However, it’s impractical, you can easily track your hand with a ring and one camera is enough for most customers, the microLED display is unneeded, just use miniLED or OLED, still can be 4K.
@@jonathancineus6424 you guys must be really nursing on that apple teet to think this is some grand brand new revelation of technology that had never been seen before… it’s. the same as before, but in an apple style.
@@lumikera the fact that you have to say “Remember google glass” basically proves my point. Please go outside and touch some real grass sir. You’ve been smoking it too long now.
It’s gonna be interesting to see how this sort of tech pans out, I feel like it’s a 50/50 chance of it working out, when the glasses come out tho it will prob skyrocket
I also think this will be the future. Not in this iteration, but wait a few years. Also Apple is working on a consumer Apple Vision (non Pro) that is more affordable.
And the XR-3 needs to be connected to an optimized PC build, which will run you another couple of grand. And it's not wireless. And did we mention that it's enterprise-only and not available to consumers?
Bro compares a professional use headset to a consumer headset 🤡 Literally even Varjo says don't buy it if you are a consumer it's made for Aviation Stimulators and medical usage + software development
I have an argument to propose for your next video: why is the Face ID constantly flashing the tracking dots? I have noticed that by looking at the recordings from my night cam; even when placed down to charge at night the iPhone seems like it tries to scan for a face very frequently. I suspect this might drain the battery faster and I need to know if there’s a reasonable explanation. Or if you don’t think it requires a video but you know the answer please let me know under the comment. Thank you! Edit: even by turning off the attention-aware feature the problem persists. I learned it might have to do with the IR instead, and that it’s something that iPhones have being doing since the first model. If that’s the case then my question would be: why is the IR always firing?
It’s cool and I’d love to try it, but I think I’ll wait for a future model There will be more apps and features by then and the device will most likely be even better in terms of specs and hopefully won’t have short battery life or an external battery pack
I wonder tho what about the screen does it hurt your eyes because it’s really close and l would like to know how will make sure it doesn’t damage your eyes a lot
Will the display stay with the device or will it anchor on a surface you set? The initial might cause headache. The latter would be ideal especially when you use it with your MacBook.
The virtual windows are locked into the 3D space, and people say they are rock solid, which is mandatory to avoid windows wobbling while you move. But you can re-fit them in front of your face if you need.
Will this ever be able to connect with a pc? The ar experience seems like it could be the perfect blend of immersion and performance. Also, will the battery get better?
They better offer a wired option for these as time goes on. I’ve had way more trouble with wireless connection to Apple products than wired connections.
So I’m wondering if the Vision Pro can be comfortably & successfully used while wearing prescription glasses or whether you MUST purchase the special ZEISS custom lens inserts to use it? (Or ZEISS inserts needed for an optimal experience)? From what I’ve seen in the presentation and from available info thus far, it doesn’t seem like it will accommodate glasses-wearers directly (with your glasses on), like other VR headsets can (usually with a “spacer” insert for glasses). So I’m just wondering about this aspect. I’m also wondering if there will be limits on the kind of prescription lens ZEISS can or will create for the Vision Pro. Like those with a very high prescription for myopia and also in need of a “reading” (aka bifocal) prescription at the same time, for reading or close up stuff. In other words, for older people with terrible eye sight. lol 😂😭😭
Because the Varjo XR-3 is an enterprise-only device - it's not available to consumers. Even their consumer-level headset, the Aero, runs $2000 - and that's VR only, not VR/AR, *and* you'll need a PC to plug it into.
finally someone knows whats up. just like their displays, the pro grades are way way more expensive, and apples display actually is a bargain compare to those yet similar performace.
I think one thing that Apple haven’t discussed about Apple Vision Pro (AVP), it’s a “guest” mode. Since this is a “wearable” device every time you take it off it will re-authenticate unlike in iPhone or iPad once FaceID authenticates you, you can pass it to your guest / friend. For such a new product it’s a good marketing that someone who has can share the experience to someone probably “allow thru iPhone or iPad or Watch” a guest. Without this feature this will be super duper uber niche 😅 co’z only the 1% can afford buying multiple AVPs.
This is totally different from android vs iphone. This is above and beyond everything else, sure, but android phones are actually gaining. New releases like the redmi note 12 pro, with incredible value and crazy fast charging, and the google pixel 7, with amazing ai photo enhancement and a fluid ecosystem somewhat like apple's are still good. Apple is very good, but if you want to do a lot of research, then you can get a good android too.
@@bradstercivic I dont think the goggles themselves look goofy, but if everyone sitting on a bus looking straight ahead immersed in their own world was wearing these it'd be odd I might just take a taxi instead
That’s basically just technological advancement, a few decades ago ppl would’ve found walking into a room and seeing everybody tapping on, talking to and/or staring at small metal and glass rectangles disturbing and unreal too
Meta quest pro has similar sensors and it cost $2000. And if meta said they wanted to sell them as cheap as they could so then they could get an income from their store, it is reasonable that apple vr would cost that+ the cost of the lidar sensor + the cost of the outside screen+ the cost of the aluminum and glass of wich the exterior of the headset is made + the price of their brand and being an "apple product"
Everyone thinks it’s too expensive… and people openly mock it as another “Apple Pricing”… but fail to realize that this is the “Pro” series of an entirely new lineup that’s just now hitting the market. This model wasn’t designed to hit the shelves and be sold by every Apple customer, to be sold by the millions. No… it’s meant to be “here’s what’s possible with Vision”, being sold to top tier enthusiasts and reviewers, tech companies and developers, and to experiment with what people do and don’t actually want out of the device. That’s when the Vision SE and other consumer cost friendly devices will come out, and truly revolutionize the culture around us today.
This is revolutionary and so cool, but the price wont allow it to be the next big thing, unless companies such as samsung create cheaper alternatives. 3500$ is basically impossible for most of people.
Headphones are miraculous thing. You put a pair of headphones, you get the same experience as pair of speakers. There is no such thing is a video version of this, we can't experience 50 inch TV screen from a tool that we can carry easily. There is no video version of headphones, until somebody invents that. - Steve Jobs
People like to hate at things they can’t afford, like I can’t afford it but you don’t see me getting butt hurt from big companies overpriced their products especially a company like Apple who keep striving on making new leap for the future of humankind.
Remember AirPods?? All the memes.. only for it to end up being one of the most copied products in history!!! They’re still making new copies of the AirPods till this day😅
Maybe I’ll look like a big fanboy, but going over the tech, I honestly expected the price to be $5,000. So when Greg said it was $3,500, I actually found myself thinking it was a low price.
I don’t understand patents I saw a guy on UA-cam use android vr headset and copy most of the stuff that Apple vr headset can do and do they do the same thing on phones copy and paste so what is a patent for
As someone who got into apple a year ago, the reason why I got an iPhone was because you did a detailed explaination and it was a good purchase as the iPhone has a better performance than android does.
This new product could change the way we interact in 10 years.
If you’re reading this, this comment was posted on 15/06/2023
Good luck seeing this in 2033
@@kelsormjaquan Because of how customers have a demand for the product. If it solves a problem, this could make a lot of sales. So this was created.
Yeah lets see, in 2033
Why would people watch this video in 2033?
Here 6-15-23
@@kelsormjaquanit solves the problem of a movie room, for someone interested into getting a 50k atleast for a movie room, they could just get a living room and this, and bam, they saved 30k.
I think it’s priced well for all the tech that’s in it. And for all the capabilities Apple programmed into it.
Apple said it will come up with a cheaper version. Honestly not all these features are needed. It was more for SHOW than anything else. To grab attention.
It will probably get rid of some of the gimmicky stuff (like the external display all it does is consume power and add to the hefty price tag). Most people will not Care about that in the long run.
@@madjunir I’m not sure Apple will get rid of the iSight feature. It’s one of the most distinctive parts of the company has compared to other’s.
I’m thinking Apple will figure out other ways (like time) to bring down the price. As manufacturing matures, the price will come down nicely.
@@madjunirthink they should rework the headset into a iPhone powered glasses that uses UWB and instead of camera-tracked motion, user need to wear a ring or use the Digital Crown or touch pad. Maybe use a projection display instead of microLED, sell it for $429 and everybody is gonna buy it. Give a thin factor to it and it will let VR reach into the majority.
It has been decades of research and hundreds of prototypes to arrive at this final product as well as the billions of dollars invested to create this product. The price is totally justified.
@@k.g6510 the original iPhone still is less expensive than it
Hi Greg, can you do a video about why apple brought back the original homepod after discontinuing it?
Did a somewhat better job of explaining everything than Apple did, and makes we want to try it even more. Still, I don't think I'll buy it, but who knows...
EDIT: Yeah, it seems like an impressive and sophisticated improvement in the AR/VR realm, which still remains pretty niche. Movies and hopefully games seem pretty awesome in it. I don't think I'd want to wear it for computing (nor conversing!), even though the eye and hand tracking are pretty cool. That's also a hefty price to be used only occasionally, and the Quest 3 is due soon at one-fifth the price. Apple and others will keep iterating (if they don't outright flop!) and hopefully they'll become unobtrusive glasses or something.
I can see two possible short-term futures.
Option 1: the Vision lineup totally flops and is discontinued before it ever becomes worth buying
Option 2: the Vision Air 4 or whatever has a built-in 6 hour battery and costs under $2000
Either way, you’re better off waiting and not buying the $3500 model that needs an external battery to run for 2 hours
@@kelsormjaquansee you in 10 years with a “stoopid thing” on your face
@@kelsormjaquanI would respectfully disagree, but appreciate your opinion.
I’m looking forward to a cheaper version of this, since I’ve worked from home for many years and would love to be able to work with unlimited screens and not have to have multiple displays on my desk.
Time will tell how well it goes, I suspect incredibly well knowing how Apple’s innovation trends after a 1st generation product. Will be interesting to see!
@@kelsormjaquanthis is definitely innovative because NO other vr/ar headset has as much tech inside as this one does. I’m not buying it because I really don’t need it lol and even if I could afford it I would only use it for watching anime.
@@ZzPolars Innovative? It IS innovative, I’ll give you that.
Innovative=/=good and useful. It may have some really cool tech, and some areas where it’s genuinely better than your phone, but also *many* areas where it’s worse. And the things it offers that a phone can’t, absolutely are not necessary - just luxuries.
Maybe a few years down the line there’ll be a Vision headset that’s a decent buy. Not the one that’s coming out next year.
People think it’s over priced but they don’t understand how much technology is in it.
Might be true, but still too much money for most people to afford
true it is cheap to what your getting your getting two processer two displays with both 23 million pixel and these 3 displays one on the outside and two one the inside there's also 12 cameras too
It’s expensive right now because this model is just mainly for developers and the hardcore market so in a couple of years this can be used by the mass market.
@@David_Granger which is why most people won’t buy it
@@David_Grangerultiple times cheaper than a car, why would anyone afford a car then? Why should most people afford some cutting edge tech?
I love how casually they made a LENTICULAR DISPLAY that displays the wearers' eyes from the appropriate angle. It's bloody phenomenal.
And they clearly thought through the interface and uses. I look forward to seeing how this thing percolates through society and gets cheaper.
technology is crazy, my friend
Personally, I can't wait for the regular "Vision" headset.
I look forward to seeing how users react to the digital keyboard 😬 that seems like it’s gonna take some getting used to.
I think the technology in it. It should even be more expensive than the price given to it. It is mind blowing. Apple has done it again
Just wanted to say I thank you for using the same music every time. It never gets old and is kind of nostalgic.
I was doubing about the price of the Apple Vision Pro, but this video made me understand why it is a reasonable price and all the amazing technology behind it.
You may "understand" the price.
Just like I "understand" the price of a Lamborghini it doesn't make it accessible to the majority.
@@madjunir so?
@@madjunir this is a first generation product which is usually never really accessible to the public
@@reyanshsinglait’s called “Pro” for a reason. A regular version targeted for a more general audience will come out much later that is a lot cheaper.
honestly every little piece of info about this makes me wanna buy it (i wish i had money)
I have read articles that 🍎 is selling the headset pretty much at cost. Because they want the gen 1 to move as much as it can into developers hands.
Indeed. Those postage stamp-sized displays don't come cheap, and Sony doesn't want to produce them any faster.
However, it’s impractical, you can easily track your hand with a ring and one camera is enough for most customers, the microLED display is unneeded, just use miniLED or OLED, still can be 4K.
@@sodaponethe manufacturing yields are just low from Sony. It’s razor edge development
The era is changing. First, touch id, then face id and now optic id
Samsung had iris unlock in 2017
@@TheRobot13 but look where it is now, just cus a company does smth first doesn’t mean it’s better
@@Coolae450 Agree.
@@Coolae450 you have a point
@@TheRobot13 where is it on the z fold 5 or S23 Ultra?
Day one pre-order 🤪 who else can’t wait?
I wish I could afford it.
@@egga22ame lol, waiting for the supposed cheaper version in 2024 or 2025 which should be around half the price
pre-order one for me too yeh?
@@jonanddy me three lol
I can afford it but will I get one? No
Atleast not the first gen version
Nothing will replace reality, but I’m still glad I’ve lived up to this point to see this technology happen.
we’ve seen this tech for a decade. remember google glass ? 😂
@@lumikera if you think this is the same, all the best with life. A doll is probably better for you than a real life girlfriend.
@@lumikerayou can’t be serious when you compare this to google glass. Are you joking or do you just not know what you’re talking about?
@@jonathancineus6424 you guys must be really nursing on that apple teet to think this is some grand brand new revelation of technology that had never been seen before… it’s. the same as before, but in an apple style.
@@lumikera the fact that you have to say “Remember google glass” basically proves my point. Please go outside and touch some real grass sir. You’ve been smoking it too long now.
It’s gonna be interesting to see how this sort of tech pans out, I feel like it’s a 50/50 chance of it working out, when the glasses come out tho it will prob skyrocket
I also think this will be the future. Not in this iteration, but wait a few years. Also Apple is working on a consumer Apple Vision (non Pro) that is more affordable.
vision air
Nice,nothing more detailed than this.
Not to mention, with the Varjo XR3, you have to pay $1500 a year on top of the $6500, otherwise it is unusable
And the XR-3 needs to be connected to an optimized PC build, which will run you another couple of grand. And it's not wireless. And did we mention that it's enterprise-only and not available to consumers?
Why lol, please tell me the reason they did that lol, I don’t get it
@@TeamCloud.cos they can. And nobody will bat an eye because it’s not apple.
Bro compares a professional use headset to a consumer headset 🤡
Literally even Varjo says don't buy it if you are a consumer it's made for Aviation Stimulators and medical usage + software development
@@TRX25EX On a feature-comparison basis, the Varjo *is* the correct comparison for the Vision Pro. Tell me how I'm wrong.
I have an argument to propose for your next video: why is the Face ID constantly flashing the tracking dots? I have noticed that by looking at the recordings from my night cam; even when placed down to charge at night the iPhone seems like it tries to scan for a face very frequently. I suspect this might drain the battery faster and I need to know if there’s a reasonable explanation. Or if you don’t think it requires a video but you know the answer please let me know under the comment. Thank you!
Edit: even by turning off the attention-aware feature the problem persists. I learned it might have to do with the IR instead, and that it’s something that iPhones have being doing since the first model. If that’s the case then my question would be: why is the IR always firing?
Very informative, well made video. Thanks
It’s cool and I’d love to try it, but I think I’ll wait for a future model
There will be more apps and features by then and the device will most likely be even better in terms of specs and hopefully won’t have short battery life or an external battery pack
6:43 This is a game-changer, PERIODT.
This is CRAZY! Sooo cool. I’m reading the series Under The Never Sky and this is literally the beginning of the Smarteye.
Saying there are 23 sensors, then only listing 22 is driving me crazy! What’s the 23rd sensor! Say it!!!
I wonder tho what about the screen does it hurt your eyes because it’s really close and l would like to know how will make sure it doesn’t damage your eyes a lot
Apple Vision is like Airpods for your eyes
Well said.
I'm glad he mentioned that other headset at the end.
you are the only one that better explained the reason why the price should matter with the technology.
Thank yoy
2:14 - Zeiss not Ziess
This would be the device we are buying next year.
South Park predicted this with the episode where cartman walks around with a box over his head.
Just one question: Can this be a stand alone device or does this have to be paired with an Apple phone to operate??
i hope the 3d movies thing from disney+ comes to other vr headsets like the quest 2 because i’d love to watch something like coco in 3d
3D Movies from Disney?
I want it but it’s so expensive
Wait for 2nd gen the price will probably be lower and alot of problems will be fixed.
That’s what I was planning to do
@@almahin4861yeah and developers will have had a lot of time to develop some great apps and some pretty good use cases should start to emerge by then
This headset seems very amazing to me. This is the future computer / smartphone. I just can’t afford it, since $3500 is still a lot of money.
Will the display stay with the device or will it anchor on a surface you set? The initial might cause headache. The latter would be ideal especially when you use it with your MacBook.
The virtual windows are locked into the 3D space, and people say they are rock solid, which is mandatory to avoid windows wobbling while you move. But you can re-fit them in front of your face if you need.
Will this ever be able to connect with a pc? The ar experience seems like it could be the perfect blend of immersion and performance. Also, will the battery get better?
Will likely connect and charge just wirelessly a couple years after its release. 🤷
They better offer a wired option for these as time goes on. I’ve had way more trouble with wireless connection to Apple products than wired connections.
@@JNSStudios2 Huh I've never had issues with any apple wireless connections.
Hey Greg. just a question, are yo currently employed by Apple, if not, why not? you can single-handedly nail an apple event.
Can you do a video on why iPads don’t have a Taptic Engine
can a person having spectacles. need to wear it over or remove it and wear?will i be ok if removed?
Really insightful 👍🏾
I love Apple
How
The MAIN thing what want to know is, this vision pro can stand alone to activate and procces all feature or still need an iphone?
It doesn't need iPhone.
Ima wait 5 years for the apple vision SE
So I’m wondering if the Vision Pro can be comfortably & successfully used while wearing prescription glasses or whether you MUST purchase the special ZEISS custom lens inserts to use it? (Or ZEISS inserts needed for an optimal experience)?
From what I’ve seen in the presentation and from available info thus far, it doesn’t seem like it will accommodate glasses-wearers directly (with your glasses on), like other VR headsets can (usually with a “spacer” insert for glasses).
So I’m just wondering about this aspect. I’m also wondering if there will be limits on the kind of prescription lens ZEISS can or will create for the Vision Pro. Like those with a very high prescription for myopia and also in need of a “reading” (aka bifocal) prescription at the same time, for reading or close up stuff. In other words, for older people with terrible eye sight. lol 😂😭😭
Can't wait for the non pro version of it
Apple did say that they plan to release the Vision Pro internationally sometime after it releases in America.
Virtual art museums will be amazing
Nobody talked about speakers in detail. How about noise cancellation? Is it as good as Airpods? That’s the key element for entertainment and calling.
It doesn’t come with headphones therefore there will not be noise cancellation however you should be able to wear AirPods and have it work seamlessly
If it has speakers then obviously it won't have noise cancellation, but you can connect your airpods for better sound if you do want that feature
It has spacial audio not anc.
Did you guys get to try the headset? And wow I didn’t know there was a headset priced at almost $7,000.
It’s not even close to release, so right now I believe it’s safe to say that no one has one.
Some UA-camrs already used
What’s even worse, is that on top of the $7000, you also have to pay $1500 a year
@@saddlebag Some UA-camrs got to try it at the event which is what he's asking
Because the Varjo XR-3 is an enterprise-only device - it's not available to consumers. Even their consumer-level headset, the Aero, runs $2000 - and that's VR only, not VR/AR, *and* you'll need a PC to plug it into.
Icons wo text description??
what will be size of that 4k display
finally someone knows whats up. just like their displays, the pro grades are way way more expensive, and apples display actually is a bargain compare to those yet similar performace.
Can you make a video on why is vision pro so expensive.
Because it’s apple…
@@OnlyMarxo good point ☝️
That’s what this video is about 😂
@@OnlyMarxo What is the comparable, cheaper headset from another manufacturer?
Because of how powerful it is and the advanced technology like optic id and the detailed screens. (Still overpriced though)
I’m gonna buy it idc
I’m buying it
6:24 - Minor correction, that is not the price for the Varjo XR-3 in dollars... That's the price in Euros. The dollar amount is $7,116.95
THIS LOOKS LIKE A POWERPOINT PRESATATION
Does it have night vision?
Ready player one!
People think just because it's expensive people won't buy it, even for people who aren't just rich they'll eat this thing up
is it me or is it that the menu looks like its from a ps vita??
Yeah I just noticed too
@Username:Apple_Explained booooot
Can you explain iOS 17
Dystopic!
This device is great, but it can make the future generations more isolated
Can you explain why Siri letters change color?
i'm so excited to work at 20, i hope i'm still alive by then so i can experience new technology😭😭
Beautiful
Well, I’m going to get it, just gotta sell my pc , phone, watch, airpod to get it lol
Lol I find it funny you didn’t mention the 2 hour battery live
Why there is no adjustable shutter speed in iPhone even in pro mode while every other phone has the option...
I think one thing that Apple haven’t discussed about Apple Vision Pro (AVP), it’s a “guest” mode. Since this is a “wearable” device every time you take it off it will re-authenticate unlike in iPhone or iPad once FaceID authenticates you, you can pass it to your guest / friend.
For such a new product it’s a good marketing that someone who has can share the experience to someone probably “allow thru iPhone or iPad or Watch” a guest.
Without this feature this will be super duper uber niche 😅 co’z only the 1% can afford buying multiple AVPs.
And there still people out there saying android is better 😂. I kinda hope they release it worldwide in the future
This is totally different from android vs iphone. This is above and beyond everything else, sure, but android phones are actually gaining. New releases like the redmi note 12 pro, with incredible value and crazy fast charging, and the google pixel 7, with amazing ai photo enhancement and a fluid ecosystem somewhat like apple's are still good. Apple is very good, but if you want to do a lot of research, then you can get a good android too.
Apple suck
If this becomes cheaper I think I would buy it but no matter how affordable it is there is one problem though this kinda sounds complicated to use…
Imagine riding on a bus (or in a subway) and everyone around you is spotting one of these goggles? That’s gotta be a disturbing experience.
Disturbing? More like hilarious. Everyone around you would be looking kinda goofy
@@bradstercivic I dont think the goggles themselves look goofy, but if everyone sitting on a bus looking straight ahead immersed in their own world was wearing these it'd be odd I might just take a taxi instead
Ready player one vibes.
That’s basically just technological advancement, a few decades ago ppl would’ve found walking into a room and seeing everybody tapping on, talking to and/or staring at small metal and glass rectangles disturbing and unreal too
Not so long ago everybody was fine covering their entire face in a cloth mask, so I think we will be fine…
Meta quest pro has similar sensors and it cost $2000. And if meta said they wanted to sell them as cheap as they could so then they could get an income from their store, it is reasonable that apple vr would cost that+ the cost of the lidar sensor + the cost of the outside screen+ the cost of the aluminum and glass of wich the exterior of the headset is made + the price of their brand and being an "apple product"
From what I know, they could be selling them at a loss.
Quest pro has trash low resolution LCD screen, they are not in same class and should not be compared.
Similar?
Apple making this move, means, smartphones cant het any better 😂😅
Well made video! Explained it better than any other video I've seen so far. Keep it up
They look like ski/snowboard goggles, lol
As a formal T2 Mac+ Advisor this is going to be a pain to support
3,500 naw I’ll use the Google cardboard
Broke ass
Where can I get google cardboard? I want it
@Ramp if that’s not soon then you’ll buy something much better for 10x cheaper
LMFAO
@@S0LILOQUYhow do you know much better if not soon. You only know when the time comes and when u actially own it
Gonna be amazing
Everyone thinks it’s too expensive… and people openly mock it as another “Apple Pricing”… but fail to realize that this is the “Pro” series of an entirely new lineup that’s just now hitting the market.
This model wasn’t designed to hit the shelves and be sold by every Apple customer, to be sold by the millions.
No… it’s meant to be “here’s what’s possible with Vision”, being sold to top tier enthusiasts and reviewers, tech companies and developers, and to experiment with what people do and don’t actually want out of the device.
That’s when the Vision SE and other consumer cost friendly devices will come out, and truly revolutionize the culture around us today.
Only For a few persone , the first week available only in USA For the first time
Masterclass in Apple marketing. Perfect. Useless piece of garbage that nobody asked for but now everyone wants.
Good job.
Wow😮
This is revolutionary and so cool, but the price wont allow it to be the next big thing, unless companies such as samsung create cheaper alternatives. 3500$ is basically impossible for most of people.
They couldn’t sell a lot anyway, Sony couldn’t provide enough MicroOled screens
Can I be immersed in the beautiful mountains of Switzerland and not freeze to death or pay a lot of money on flight tickets and hotel?
I'm sorry but when the cropped girl with the glasses came up I just bawled out laughing. But apple ate with this one I can't lie.
Your animations are just ahhhh
That 1guy🙂
Headphones are miraculous thing. You put a pair of headphones, you get the same experience as pair of speakers. There is no such thing is a video version of this, we can't experience 50 inch TV screen from a tool that we can carry easily. There is no video version of headphones, until somebody invents that.
- Steve Jobs
What happens if you drop it?
I’d probably just dent it, minor dent, at most a crack, nothing too bad.
i appreciate the tech that was put into this but i aint paying 3500 dollars for a headset
Everyone said the iphone was going to flop, look at it now. Same with the ipad and apple watch. See you all in headset parties in 10 years.
People like to hate at things they can’t afford, like I can’t afford it but you don’t see me getting butt hurt from big companies overpriced their products especially a company like Apple who keep striving on making new leap for the future of humankind.
Remember AirPods?? All the memes.. only for it to end up being one of the most copied products in history!!! They’re still making new copies of the AirPods till this day😅
Maybe I’ll look like a big fanboy, but going over the tech, I honestly expected the price to be $5,000. So when Greg said it was $3,500, I actually found myself thinking it was a low price.
i think you forgot to tell about the 2 hour battery life
I don’t understand patents I saw a guy on UA-cam use android vr headset and copy most of the stuff that Apple vr headset can do and do they do the same thing on phones copy and paste so what is a patent for
Well priced apple and it has more mega pixels then every product they made
@Username:Apple_Explained nope
I don't believe the hype until it has proven itself.
He should make a video on why this device is so expensive