Dunning-Kruger effect. The people chatting are so bad, they have no idea how bad they are. It's likely lots of chat is thinking while watching and experienced/humble enough to know they should stfu about a mate in two if Levy doesn't see one. (Not that it's impossible, but unlikely a thing you should confidently type in chat unless, again, you know nothing.)
@@LetsPlayCrazy I think he’s saying he feels attacked because sometimes he plays great and then all of a sudden starts playing horrible and blundering everything
Tbh I though 900 guy was good and not cheating until bullet. As a 900 I could've found a couple of the good moves he made but only if I took a few minutes. There's no way he found those moves that quickly
Your explanation of the tactical sequence at 1:30:56 was probably my favorite minute of Gotham content I've seen, and I've seen A LOT. I'm around 1250 and this blew my mind. Nasty indeed 😈
When you trap one of your opponent’s pieces you don’t have to take it until he wastes a move trying to free it. Doing this can make you go from a winning position to a dominant position just by gaining that one extra move
The feeling when you come here from Levy's stream and see a calm and kind guy instead of a sarcastic troll. You do amazing content, happy to see you being sponsored!
On the "general principles" thing Gotham was talking about, I just think of any "chess rule" as more like guidelines. Some are stricter than others but they're all still just guidelines. We deal with the same thing in software engineering where there are "rules" or whatever, but for the vast majority of those cases, there are sometimes edge cases where those rules don't apply and can be bent or broken. I like the word "guideline" more for stuff like that.
I started watching this channel in 2020 and my rating was 800 and now in 2021 my rating is 1589 in rapid and also in blitz its super cool 1457 and i am also winning my chess tournaments and my coach is also saying woah you are 1550 and it feel 1800+ Thanks A Lot Levy
I am not flexing its true and tip is puzzles and matches higher than your level like if you are a intermediate then see advance level got it ? To learn traps and tricks that they use and also no traps all the time only some bcoz you will get use to traps and will loose all games
For a long time, I didn't play chess, then o started watching you and Hikaru. I just hit 1600 rating. I'm surprised how much I learned from you. Great work.
@FourCGames I mean, people can play higher than their level. It doesn't necessarily represent their ceiling. Only their average playing strength. So, maybe they are underrated, but I'd completely believe that they are a 900 who played an amazing game
This guy's is so informative and helpful, if we would add all the rating he has made his viewers gain it would be way over 10000, so we can now call you a Super-duper Grand Master
Rating is a comparison algorithm, it doesn't work like money. If you're 2000 and beat 1000 you get nothing. If you're 3500 like Nakamura, beating a 3000 gives you just one or two. Nothing more. I'm 1900 btw so I'm confident about my answer.
@@ItamiPlaysGuitar 1900! You sir are a shiny god amongst mere mortals, you have proved your point, now please wrestle thine divine hog back into your breeches and leave at once, you’re turning us peasants green with envy.
Just think (before every move) what did this piece protect, and what will protect it? As for tactics that your enemy does, you just have to get an eye for those, but it happens. You’ll get there homie.
Every one blunder even GMs but i have cool trick to minimize it play tactics more!! after a while because you solving 3-5 moves puzzle under 1 min, one move blunder you will spot it super fast for yourself or your opponent.
LEVY! Just now I played against a Pirc Defense with the London System. I did it the way you showed in the video and MY GOD. It was insane. Best game I've ever played. I knew exactly what to do, barely took time to think, got 97.9% accuracy and finished with a check mate with 7:30 on my clock in a 10 minute game. Good lord was it awesome. Thank you for showing me this. It was the win that got me to 1100 for the first time!
900s are a weird bunch, they either blunder randomly or make good moves. When I was 900 I would analyse games and it could be 95% or just 50% sometimes.
Hey Levy! Thank you for posting so good content! I started rewatching the whole series before this last video! I started playing chess in december and only watched your content and bought all of your courses! I'm rated almost 1000 now and I've learned SO MUCH! Love your style and the way you teach! Tanks!
Hi, I'm French and your way of saying "en passant" is almost perfect (not when you actually try to say it properly, usually the second time, when you actually say "un poisson" which means "a fish"). The final "t" of "en passant" is "muet" (not pronounced at all). I wish I could help you on your French accent one day, thanks for those videos anyway =)
My thought process during chess: My move: "What's preventing me from making an attack?" "What can I do to weaken that defense?" "Is that even WORTH my effort (is there a stronger, less move costly attack available)?" "How can I coordinate my pieces to make this a GREAT attack (if I decide to stick with the first idea)?" And finally, "is there a possible move of theirs that will make me play defense (if there is, I negate that move and play defense immediately)?" On their move: "What does that attack?" "What does it defend?" "What does it team up with?" "Are there other moves in the future that will make that move make more sense (like a devastating check that will ruin my coordination)?" Hope this helped somebody.
I went from 500? to over 1900 in a few games! i'm not sure why ppl have keep talking bout these elo climbs. of course ive been playing chess forever. but I thought thats what the server does when you first make an account. The first few ppl is super easy, then your rating shoots up, then it slows down again. IDK, thats how its always been for me. Like it finds your real strength and adjust accordingly, to give you more neck to neck games. ?
nice deflection at 1:04:21. there are a ton of those in puzzles. they are so common that I now default to looking for sacrificial checks when nothing else looks good. it's either that or sac the queen in some way, beloved theme of all puzzle.
This is already one of my favorite videos by you! (Scotch; London; e6, b6; ... and, "Don't be shaken, bring on the Kraken" type advice as well.) Thanks!
@@TheDarkNightRising Did you watch Sherlock season 4? The show really went downhill after season 2. And in hindsight I kinda think it was always just bad. Not that Benedict or the actors were bad. Just not great writing.
@@gaaalavant yep, and I agree with the fact that it went downhill but regardless there were some eps I enjoyed after s2, for me it was the last season that was pretty much disappointing to say the least
Just wanted to say thanks Levy, for giving your subs lesson, idea through your game and thought process. I started to know chess at age 8, but not really into it. Until know age 25 after i watched queens gambit and start over again to learn chess. I thought i started at 800 on chess.com, now after 2 months+ it raised to 1000+. Thanks once again 👍
Thank you so much for making this series. There so informative and helpful. In fact, I'm in the middle of playing a daily game where I played the London System and my opponent played the King's Indian so now I know exactly how to play that! You came right when I needed you most!
What a strong 900 player... I dont wanna say he was ocasionally cheating but man if youre playing like this you shouldnt be 900. Maybe he just plays drunk all the time
Hey Levy, I know you might not be able to read this but I've been watching your content for 2 months and even tho I'm not going up the rating ladder too much I feel much more comfortable on the 64 squares and being able to plan and follow strategies, so thank you very much, keep up the amazing work!
Hey levy can you please make a video on how to play when you are material down or you have other pieces instead of a queen for example rook and a knight vs queen and how to co ordinate your pieces.PLEASE I LOVE YOUR CONTENT.
yo man I just wanna thank you so much. I’ve literally improved so much just from this series and chess has really become part of my daily routine. Thank you!
Day 30: Of requesting Levy to cover opposite coloured bishop endgames. Especially when you have a slight material advantage of being up by two or three pawns against your opponent and you both have opposite coloured bishops as well.
Bruh stop, nothing to learn there. Just put your pawns on the opposite color of the enemies bishop, and bring your king into the attack. Once your king takes enemies pawns, then you walk your pass pawns using the king to defend each step of the way.
@@cwazyazn I disagree there. Since the defending side can easily set up blockades with his king and bishop. So even if you are two or three pawns up on your opponent, it's difficult to win these type of endgames cuz of this. Also your opponent more often or not will try to sacrifice his bishop for all of your pawns leaving with you no winning chances. That's why imo opposite coloured bishop endgames are so difficult to win at.
@@bakulshah4367 that's why he isn't making a video about. Almost all opposite colored bishop endgames with close to equal material are drawn. If the position is not drawn, then that's because one side just has way more pawns/activity. In which case you just follow other endgame principles. Eg Opposition etc...there's nothing really there to teach.
eh i don't know if he was cheating but playing queen d3 and missing the obvious Ng5 was weird, if he was cheating he didn't want to win just not get totally embarrassed
This is so fun to watch. I'm around 1100 and I have a mate that's around 2200 who sometimes agrees to play some games against me. I usually see nothing wrong with what I'm doing, try to play solid but then suddenly he has a move I never saw coming and I realize that I lost quite a few moves ago.
Lev thank you for all your instruction. I have been studying and playing the Vienna since you posted your video and it is my go to opening with white 1. e4 e5. This video gave me a light bulb moment in your first game with the e6, b6 opening. I switched to the Classical Dutch about a month before you posted the Vienna Game and love playing this as black. I play 1. d4 e6. I was always disappointed when someone opened with e4 because then I could not play the Dutch (1. ... e6), I played the Scandinavian. Although not identical, the Vienna and Dutch seem very similar to play (structures and king side attacks). In game one when I saw how you moved Nge7, it reminded me of one of the Vienna variations and reinforced how I could get my pieces into Vienna/Dutch positions that I love to play. I started playing some non-rated games with this opening and I have had a great time using it. A lot of times my opponent is thoroughly confused. If the situation allows, I play Dutch/Vienna concepts and get my king-side attack going. Other times, I find my opponent will believe I am playing a French Defense, and then I slap the Rozman French stuff on them. With the play b6 followed by Bb7 it can transpose beautifully into some Rozman French strategies and tactics. Also, I believe it is advantageous to get a queen side fianchetto-ed bishop in the Dutch. This does not happen very often when I play the Classical Dutch (1. d4 e6) because White fianchettoes their king side bishop first. When I watched some earlier videos and you talked about your e6, b6 system I did not understand why you thought what you thought. You talk about its flexibility and now I get it. I have committed the next couple months to deeper opening study of the Dutch, but when I finish, I will be downloading your course on e6/b6. You have opened my mind and eyes to the possibilities.
Quick thank you for the inspiration to resume my chess hobby and really learn. My mother asked me to teach her the other day and it as well made me want to get back into it. This is now my favorite place to see someone explain some theory and tactics with real in game adjustments. It’s great. Also the people watching were probably expecting you to be so baller than you were drinking Chanel No.5 or the urine of players you’ve scared into wetting their pants with some winning moves 👍
Game 1 after Qa7, you tried sooooo hard to not scream "CHEATER!!" LOL you were more passive aggressive than my gf when you said "I like the alternating between great and terrible" 😂😂 (Always obvious when opponent plays at 1900+ for most of the game, then under time pressure reverts back at his 900 rating)
I think you need to check how his moves are being evaluated if there are more good moves and ok moves than the "book moves, best move" then I am not sure how you will suggest he is cheating. Having been on the other end for more than once, being accused of cheating I am not sure how you call a person a cheater without a clue as to know if he is really cheating. As club player myself I am never able to play online chess in the these online community which is so weird and poor mannered. Some of my moves are like 1900+, for example in this game below, ua-cam.com/video/gnBxus_lxkA/v-deo.html I knew that rook d4 to b4 was blunder and that there was that awesome rook sacrifice(at time - 28:20) I am quite sure for person like me with chess rating less than 1100, you would never expect me to do moves like that when you see that on the board you get pissed off.
@@Ivy_Inquisitor OK "Good" cheaters (which is a contradiction in terms) do not always play the best or book moves. That is a sure way to get caught. They keep the engine running during the game and play the 3rd best, 2nd best, 5th best, etc. and keep themselves in the game. Whether it be to save face, or give themselves a chance, or just ego....I don't know but that player was 10000% not a 900 rated player!! I have been accused to cheating many times. I do not take it personally bc I don't cheat but some players, esp higher rated players do not like losing to players with lower ratings. And sometimes, whether from better prep or just better play you DO beat higher rated players. And sometimes they call you a cheater. I laugh, say "report me.....good game" and get on with my life.
@@KevinWood44 Could be true too but we can never be sure sadly but yeah I wouldn't be happy if people cheat and abuse system. And if I was a victim of it.
Yeah this is so helpful. If you have to put why you are playing your move in words then it forces you to actually think about it a s not just play it because it looks good
I was just watching game of shadows and wondering if their chess game was interesting from a chess perspective, so thanks Levy, I hope you make that video.
1:12:58 that is more or less the 150 Attack in the Pirc Defense. With the only difference being the Bishop on f4 instead of e3. Such a nice weapon against kings indian setups as a london player :)
Watching people (levy) playing chess while explaining what they're doing is exactly what i needed rn
@wolfgang Definitely
@wolfgang ok will do
@wolfgang yess i watch him play on twitch
@wolfgang absolute sexy speedrun
Why does Levy's chat always seem to find the worst move in any position and think it's good?
It makes me feel good about my chess skills
This is why we lose sub battles
Because not everyone watching his videos is at his level
Dunning-Kruger effect. The people chatting are so bad, they have no idea how bad they are. It's likely lots of chat is thinking while watching and experienced/humble enough to know they should stfu about a mate in two if Levy doesn't see one. (Not that it's impossible, but unlikely a thing you should confidently type in chat unless, again, you know nothing.)
Lmao
the h move is just hoping levy would say 'and now its officialy a grandmaster game'
I was gonna say the same thing lol
I'm really happy that our beloved UA-camr is finally getting sponsor ads, huge milestone, Congrats!
You get that bag levy, you deserve it!
Yes
I'm really happy I have UA-cam premium and am unaware of these ads.
@@j-cole88 So the first minute of the video doesnt play for you? It's an in-video ad, not a UA-cam monetization ad.
He has been sponsored since the old house #notanog
"I'm not perfect...unlike some of these 900s that I play against" oooooo the shade lmao
“I like the alternating between great and terrible”
I feel attacked lol
are you bobby nur? Or am I missing the joke? :D
@@LetsPlayCrazy I think he’s saying he feels attacked because sometimes he plays great and then all of a sudden starts playing horrible and blundering everything
Is Levy implying the opponent's using a engine?
@@theplaylistpsycho Yeah, he's implying the opponent is going back and forth between using engine moves (great) and playing his own moves (terrible).
@@theplaylistpsycho yeahhh it was pretty obvious a lot of those moves were not 900 moves imo
"Queen f6 is a great move... if you want to lose your queen"
- GothamChess 2021
Levy's 900 elo opponents are always so strong.. until it's bullet time 😂
Also known as "I can't look at engine anymore" time
@@adorablehorrorfrombeyond1462 he made like 5 blunders
Tbh I though 900 guy was good and not cheating until bullet. As a 900 I could've found a couple of the good moves he made but only if I took a few minutes. There's no way he found those moves that quickly
The h pawn push shows he cheated only engines and super GMs do that
@@hrishantaswani8055 that move was a mistake
Your explanation of the tactical sequence at 1:30:56 was probably my favorite minute of Gotham content I've seen, and I've seen A LOT.
I'm around 1250 and this blew my mind. Nasty indeed 😈
Man that 900 was strong AF lmao
Too strong for me lmao
He Smurf
Why do people think he is actually 900? He isn't.. He probably just created a new account so he could play Gotham, he is definitely around 1500.
@@fourcgames7568he is definitely a 900 he has the same style I and a lot of 900s have. Sometimes you just play like a grand master
He was deffo cheating. I am a 1000 and that "900"was at least 600 points higher than myself
When you trap one of your opponent’s pieces you don’t have to take it until he wastes a move trying to free it.
Doing this can make you go from a winning position to a dominant position just by gaining that one extra move
The feeling when you come here from Levy's stream and see a calm and kind guy instead of a sarcastic troll. You do amazing content, happy to see you being sponsored!
On the "general principles" thing Gotham was talking about, I just think of any "chess rule" as more like guidelines. Some are stricter than others but they're all still just guidelines. We deal with the same thing in software engineering where there are "rules" or whatever, but for the vast majority of those cases, there are sometimes edge cases where those rules don't apply and can be bent or broken. I like the word "guideline" more for stuff like that.
I started watching this channel in 2020 and my rating was 800 and now in 2021 my rating is 1589 in rapid and also in blitz its super cool 1457 and i am also winning my chess tournaments and my coach is also saying woah you are 1550 and it feel 1800+ Thanks A Lot Levy
any specific advice on improving?
Teach us senpai
flex xD
I am not flexing its true and tip is puzzles and matches higher than your level like if you are a intermediate then see advance level got it ? To learn traps and tricks that they use and also no traps all the time only some bcoz you will get use to traps and will loose all games
@@Hacker123 chill bru i said that in ironic way
I really love how he hyped himself & his idea of the youtube video with sherlok at 1:10:00😂
1:32:06 - 1:32:15 and then you also have this.
@@rikidas5705 xDD
41:59 I love it when Levy turns into a confused duck.
For a long time, I didn't play chess, then o started watching you and Hikaru. I just hit 1600 rating. I'm surprised how much I learned from you. Great work.
mad respect to my boy bobby representing the 900's v well
He isn't 900 man. It's a success when 900 rated players don't hang a queen in the first 10 moves. That guy was like 1500, definitely not 900.
@FourCGames I mean, people can play higher than their level. It doesn't necessarily represent their ceiling. Only their average playing strength. So, maybe they are underrated, but I'd completely believe that they are a 900 who played an amazing game
@@fourcgames7568 what kind of 900s are you playing?
This guy's is so informative and helpful, if we would add all the rating he has made his viewers gain it would be way over 10000, so we can now call you a Super-duper Grand Master
All the love for Levy, but wouldn't most youtube/twitch chess content creator be super duper grandmasters then? What is hikaru, 2700+10000 sheesh.
I think you meant over 9000 and the Tilte being "Super Saiyan Grand Master"
Rating is a comparison algorithm, it doesn't work like money. If you're 2000 and beat 1000 you get nothing. If you're 3500 like Nakamura, beating a 3000 gives you just one or two. Nothing more. I'm 1900 btw so I'm confident about my answer.
@@ItamiPlaysGuitar 1900! You sir are a shiny god amongst mere mortals, you have proved your point, now please wrestle thine divine hog back into your breeches and leave at once, you’re turning us peasants green with envy.
The not blunder part is impossible for me
Just think (before every move) what did this piece protect, and what will protect it? As for tactics that your enemy does, you just have to get an eye for those, but it happens. You’ll get there homie.
Just play blitz so blundering does not matter (unless it is mate in one)
Every one blunder even GMs but i have cool trick to minimize it play tactics more!! after a while because you solving 3-5 moves puzzle under 1 min, one move blunder you will spot it super fast for yourself or your opponent.
1. Just trade every piece and turn it into a king and pawn endgame.
For now...
Opponent: hangs a piece
Levy: ah yeah, a 1000
Or 1660 on move 6
LEVY! Just now I played against a Pirc Defense with the London System. I did it the way you showed in the video and MY GOD. It was insane. Best game I've ever played. I knew exactly what to do, barely took time to think, got 97.9% accuracy and finished with a check mate with 7:30 on my clock in a 10 minute game. Good lord was it awesome. Thank you for showing me this. It was the win that got me to 1100 for the first time!
Yeah, the 900 was really "inspired".
Didn’t really seem like he was cheating. Lots of mistakes and moves overall were very human.
@@Isometrix116 nah, I think he just made random moves which levy calculated to be a treat.
Levy ,thank you for the bishop and knight mate at the end, i enjoyed that and learned from it.
The first player should be pissing on everyone at his level. Strongest 900 I've seen.
Idk if you're ironic but he's probably using an engine tbh
@@julienb.5783 You mean sarcastic... Not ironic.
900s are a weird bunch, they either blunder randomly or make good moves. When I was 900 I would analyse games and it could be 95% or just 50% sometimes.
@@smollilnub3644 Yees lmao
one game i make like 5 blunders, 6 mistakes and the next game i make none
@@smollilnub3644 btw you said when you was 900
what rating are you now? and how did you improve?
Me literally typing on his discord "why no ruy lopez?!"
Levy immediately after I finish typing: This is why...
Me: *deletes message*
Pressure to mate with B and N in under 2 minutes live stream while teaching and explaining. That’s class! Sik skills!
love the bishop and knight mate instruction at the end!
Hey Levy! Thank you for posting so good content! I started rewatching the whole series before this last video! I started playing chess in december and only watched your content and bought all of your courses! I'm rated almost 1000 now and I've learned SO MUCH! Love your style and the way you teach!
Tanks!
Actually the most instructive chess video series I've ever seen! I'm looking at the game in a whole new way! Im hoping to get up to 1200 soon 🤞
Hi, I'm French and your way of saying "en passant" is almost perfect (not when you actually try to say it properly, usually the second time, when you actually say "un poisson" which means "a fish").
The final "t" of "en passant" is "muet" (not pronounced at all).
I wish I could help you on your French accent one day, thanks for those videos anyway =)
This is the third time I have watched WAC E. 6.
It helps me to review the lesson.
Levi was so dope he decided to take time out of his day to school twitch chat on how to do a two bishops mate
I just want to say that this is now my favourite youtube channel. Seriously great content. I have learned so much over the last few weeks, thank you!
YES THERE IS ANOTHER EPISODE *me waiting after 11 days for another episode*
Amazing demo of checkmate with Knight and Bishop. I have so much to learn. Sometimes I make mistakes and draw with a rook and king. Love your videos.
My thought process during chess:
My move: "What's preventing me from making an attack?"
"What can I do to weaken that defense?"
"Is that even WORTH my effort (is there a stronger, less move costly attack available)?"
"How can I coordinate my pieces to make this a GREAT attack (if I decide to stick with the first idea)?"
And finally, "is there a possible move of theirs that will make me play defense (if there is, I negate that move and play defense immediately)?"
On their move:
"What does that attack?"
"What does it defend?"
"What does it team up with?"
"Are there other moves in the future that will make that move make more sense (like a devastating check that will ruin my coordination)?"
Hope this helped somebody.
I would add one to the on their move: “What does that stops defending?”
I went from 900 to 1250 in the last few months.
Thnx to watching you, eric rosen and hikaru
I went from 500? to over 1900 in a few games!
i'm not sure why ppl have keep talking bout these elo climbs. of course ive been playing chess forever. but I thought thats what the server does when you first make an account. The first few ppl is super easy, then your rating shoots up, then it slows down again. IDK, thats how its always been for me. Like it finds your real strength and adjust accordingly, to give you more neck to neck games.
?
@@Jh-bx7vo This comment is giving off some Axxl vibes
first of all yayyyyyy gotham got sponsored. And second he is the only one i can calmly sit and watch the whole sponsored clip
nice deflection at 1:04:21. there are a ton of those in puzzles. they are so common that I now default to looking for sacrificial checks when nothing else looks good. it's either that or sac the queen in some way, beloved theme of all puzzle.
These vids never get old, cheers levy
This is already one of my favorite videos by you! (Scotch; London; e6, b6; ... and, "Don't be shaken, bring on the Kraken" type advice as well.) Thanks!
Robert Downey Jr.’s got nothing on Eggs Benedict Cabbage Patch
DEAD CHILDHOOD BEST FRIEND WHO HE FAKE REMEMBERS AS A DOG CAUSE HIS SISTER HAS WEIRD HYPNOSIS POWERS
@@matiasforti6088 rly? I missed that
What a legend.
@@TheDarkNightRising Did you watch Sherlock season 4? The show really went downhill after season 2. And in hindsight I kinda think it was always just bad. Not that Benedict or the actors were bad. Just not great writing.
@@gaaalavant yep, and I agree with the fact that it went downhill but regardless there were some eps I enjoyed after s2, for me it was the last season that was pretty much disappointing to say the least
Just wanted to say thanks Levy, for giving your subs lesson, idea through your game and thought process. I started to know chess at age 8, but not really into it. Until know age 25 after i watched queens gambit and start over again to learn chess. I thought i started at 800 on chess.com, now after 2 months+ it raised to 1000+. Thanks once again 👍
Yay another one! I love these. Also Congrats on the sponsorship!
Thank you so much for making this series. There so informative and helpful. In fact, I'm in the middle of playing a daily game where I played the London System and my opponent played the King's Indian so now I know exactly how to play that! You came right when I needed you most!
What a strong 900 player... I dont wanna say he was ocasionally cheating but man if youre playing like this you shouldnt be 900. Maybe he just plays drunk all the time
You’re completely correct, I am always drunk when I play
i am a 600 and i sometimes play like that lol
@@AA-gz6yg no
Playing while intoxicated is very fun lmao
the king bishop knight checkmate was petty awesome
Yeah it was. It's so hard to do in a game.
It would be really cool to see you vs someone higher around 2000 as well in these videos!
Levy is the best in his class. Thank You.
Great know how. Great vibe.
“The 900 was way better than these 2 1000’s to be nice about it” -GothamChess2021
Hey Levy, I know you might not be able to read this but I've been watching your content for 2 months and even tho I'm not going up the rating ladder too much I feel much more comfortable on the 64 squares and being able to plan and follow strategies, so thank you very much, keep up the amazing work!
Hey levy can you please make a video on how to play when you are material down or you have other pieces instead of a queen for example rook and a knight vs queen and how to co ordinate your pieces.PLEASE I LOVE YOUR CONTENT.
yo man I just wanna thank you so much. I’ve literally improved so much just from this series and chess has really become part of my daily routine. Thank you!
First challenger was doing great and launching what looked like a really dangerous attack, until he wasn't.
I missed this series glad its back.
Day 30: Of requesting Levy to cover opposite coloured bishop endgames.
Especially when you have a slight material advantage of being up by two or three pawns against your opponent and you both have opposite coloured bishops as well.
Godamn he ignored you he is a noob for sure
Bruh stop, nothing to learn there. Just put your pawns on the opposite color of the enemies bishop, and bring your king into the attack. Once your king takes enemies pawns, then you walk your pass pawns using the king to defend each step of the way.
@@cwazyazn I disagree there.
Since the defending side can easily set up blockades with his king and bishop.
So even if you are two or three pawns up on your opponent, it's difficult to win these type of endgames cuz of this.
Also your opponent more often or not will try to sacrifice his bishop for all of your pawns leaving with you no winning chances.
That's why imo opposite coloured bishop endgames are so difficult to win at.
i mean, i am no expert because im only 1700 rating but i wouldn't consider 3 pawns a slight material advantage, it's a pretty big one lol
@@bakulshah4367 that's why he isn't making a video about. Almost all opposite colored bishop endgames with close to equal material are drawn. If the position is not drawn, then that's because one side just has way more pawns/activity. In which case you just follow other endgame principles. Eg Opposition etc...there's nothing really there to teach.
Watching this after watching your sherlock video yesterday. Cool seeing you get excited about the idea for that video.
First guy was so obvious... Dude why u're doing that publicly. So dumb
I know right? Levy won't accuse but it's obvious. His moves are too good for a 900
Yeah looked like he only used the engine for some moves and then moved quickly in the others
Levy sounded so depressed playing that game as well I felt so bad
eh i don't know if he was cheating but playing queen d3 and missing the obvious Ng5 was weird, if he was cheating he didn't want to win just not get totally embarrassed
@@nickoslekkas3336 any 900 will make that Ng5 in a heartbeat. And moving Rh3 was so werid as well lol
love the bishop/knight checkmate. such a tricky pattern to remember
Exactly what I needed to distract me from the gme losses 💎✋
Was just thinking I had run out of Gotham videos to watch. Perfect timing
Congratulations on the sponsor👏
Congrats on 1M...I'm a very late subscriber but love what your doing especially this series and also UA-cam recommended you
martinelli’s go crazy, i have a jug of it in the fridge right now
1:20:35 Lmao "Oh there's Daniel. Hi Daniel!" is so funny to me. Prob the way he said it
When will you do a tour of your house?
This is so fun to watch. I'm around 1100 and I have a mate that's around 2200 who sometimes agrees to play some games against me. I usually see nothing wrong with what I'm doing, try to play solid but then suddenly he has a move I never saw coming and I realize that I lost quite a few moves ago.
Love your content mate ❤️
Keep this channel growing!! 1 MILLION SUBS on the way
Yes youtube wants a remach, im applying for next tournament if possible :)
hmm imagine if levy makes it on monthly basis
Lev thank you for all your instruction.
I have been studying and playing the Vienna since you posted your video and it is my go to opening with white 1. e4 e5.
This video gave me a light bulb moment in your first game with the e6, b6 opening.
I switched to the Classical Dutch about a month before you posted the Vienna Game and love playing this as black. I play 1. d4 e6. I was always disappointed when someone opened with e4 because then I could not play the Dutch (1. ... e6), I played the Scandinavian. Although not identical, the Vienna and Dutch seem very similar to play (structures and king side attacks).
In game one when I saw how you moved Nge7, it reminded me of one of the Vienna variations and reinforced how I could get my pieces into Vienna/Dutch positions that I love to play. I started playing some non-rated games with this opening and I have had a great time using it.
A lot of times my opponent is thoroughly confused. If the situation allows, I play Dutch/Vienna concepts and get my king-side attack going. Other times, I find my opponent will believe I am playing a French Defense, and then I slap the Rozman French stuff on them. With the play b6 followed by Bb7 it can transpose beautifully into some Rozman French strategies and tactics. Also, I believe it is advantageous to get a queen side fianchetto-ed bishop in the Dutch. This does not happen very often when I play the Classical Dutch (1. d4 e6) because White fianchettoes their king side bishop first.
When I watched some earlier videos and you talked about your e6, b6 system I did not understand why you thought what you thought. You talk about its flexibility and now I get it. I have committed the next couple months to deeper opening study of the Dutch, but when I finish, I will be downloading your course on e6/b6. You have opened my mind and eyes to the possibilities.
just hit 900 :) been playing intensely for the past 2 months or so
It took me 4 months to claw my way up to 900. Well done!
Aaaah those openings were on my wish list - thanks Gotham !
Look at you with the sponsorship! Nice! Levy is big time now, sponsorship's, twitter verification, what a time. Congratulations man, you deserve it.
I've been following your content since you had some handful of subscribers. Super proud of your growth! You don't know what taking a break means!!!!!
13:18
I laughed so bad, omg
Quick thank you for the inspiration to resume my chess hobby and really learn. My mother asked me to teach her the other day and it as well made me want to get back into it.
This is now my favorite place to see someone explain some theory and tactics with real in game adjustments. It’s great.
Also the people watching were probably expecting you to be so baller than you were drinking Chanel No.5 or the urine of players you’ve scared into wetting their pants with some winning moves 👍
Game 1 after Qa7, you tried sooooo hard to not scream "CHEATER!!" LOL you were more passive aggressive than my gf when you said "I like the alternating between great and terrible" 😂😂
(Always obvious when opponent plays at 1900+ for most of the game, then under time pressure reverts back at his 900 rating)
yeah that dude definitely had some help from somewhere... haha
I think you need to check how his moves are being evaluated if there are more good moves and ok moves than the "book moves, best move" then I am not sure how you will suggest he is cheating.
Having been on the other end for more than once, being accused of cheating I am not sure how you call a person a cheater without a clue as to know if he is really cheating.
As club player myself I am never able to play online chess in the these online community which is so weird and poor mannered.
Some of my moves are like 1900+,
for example in this game below,
ua-cam.com/video/gnBxus_lxkA/v-deo.html
I knew that rook d4 to b4 was blunder and that there was that awesome rook sacrifice(at time - 28:20)
I am quite sure for person like me with chess rating less than 1100, you would never expect me to do moves like that when you see that on the board you get pissed off.
I don’t think he was cheating because he was still making mistakes and inaccuracies the whole game
@@Ivy_Inquisitor OK "Good" cheaters (which is a contradiction in terms) do not always play the best or book moves. That is a sure way to get caught. They keep the engine running during the game and play the 3rd best, 2nd best, 5th best, etc. and keep themselves in the game. Whether it be to save face, or give themselves a chance, or just ego....I don't know but that player was 10000% not a 900 rated player!!
I have been accused to cheating many times. I do not take it personally bc I don't cheat but some players, esp higher rated players do not like losing to players with lower ratings. And sometimes, whether from better prep or just better play you DO beat higher rated players. And sometimes they call you a cheater. I laugh, say "report me.....good game" and get on with my life.
@@KevinWood44 Could be true too but we can never be sure sadly but yeah I wouldn't be happy if people cheat and abuse system. And if I was a victim of it.
Impressed with the bishop horsey
finish at the end.
I've done it with two bishops.
Never this way though.
Saved for future.
I guess the lesson learnt in this whole series is...
Talk to yourself about what your going to do (or all the million viewers watching your stream)!
@@Thinkaboutit897 yeah this has helped me so many times to find a middlegame idea, just pretend I'm sasha grischuk and do an accent while analysing
Yeah this is so helpful. If you have to put why you are playing your move in words then it forces you to actually think about it a s not just play it because it looks good
@øranuto husband say “damn my pencil is irritating my hemorrhoids” and wait for a laugh. If there isn’t one, you’re good.
two hour flew by i cant believe this
Levy will be sad but very proud when his viewers will defeat him with his own openings!
14:10 - lichess tells that taking e pawn is the best move :D
When you're not watching 8 months in the future so you can't check out his video on Sherlock's chess game... :(
cant wait for the sherlock holmes a game of shadows chess game analysis video, i love that movie too :)
and i love your vids
do the 2nd last blunder,you can never lose a game of chess
Already looking forward for the sherlock holmes video!
I really need this vid i was at 1530 and tilted to 1440 😔
I don’t speak english very well so i love your style and how you play. Very fun
INSTRUCTIVE: Think also your opponents moves.
Why wasn't I doing it earlier...
4:48 1000 players here I would do the same since you often just win with pushing your pawns once the king castled.
Here goes my fun 2 hours.
And he says “sorry UA-cam, I get excited.” Stfu levy that just made my whole day
Levy: how to win at chess
Also levy: proceeds to beat bunch of kids
Watched this episode today and went up 50 points! Thank you levy!! 👍 :)
I sus that 900 player was cheating with a lower rated computer maybe (7 difficulty)
I think he was playing some moves with the engine and others not to try to make it less sus. But yeah
Sporadic cheating imo. He plays like a 350 rated six year old one minute then morphs into Magnus for a stretch. Pretty obviously using an engine.
Yea I feel like he played fairly then used engines for some time like levy said brilliant move succeeded by blunders lol
I was just watching game of shadows and wondering if their chess game was interesting from a chess perspective, so thanks Levy, I hope you make that video.
Can you play stronger opponents so higher rated players also can win at chess :)
1:12:58 that is more or less the 150 Attack in the Pirc Defense. With the only difference being the Bishop on f4 instead of e3. Such a nice weapon against kings indian setups as a london player :)