First Impressions: 2013 Chevrolet Malibu

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 вер 2024
  • The new 2013 Chevrolet Malibu, began its life with a light-hybrid Eco model. Now Malibu is filling out its stylish lineup at both the bottom and top ends. MotorWeek host John Davis has the first impressions review of the 2013 Chevrolet Malibu base model and turbo model.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @chimaeraSPK
    @chimaeraSPK 12 років тому

    They do it based on the amount of fuel used per 100 miles. The Camry V6 uses 4.0 gallons of gas per 100 miles which equates to approx. 25 mpg combined. The Malibu Turbo on the other hand uses 4.2 gal./100 miles and that equates to approx. 23.8 or 24 mpg combined.

  • @76carmel
    @76carmel 12 років тому

    I'm in the Indianapolis area, and I've seen quite a few Malibu Ecos on the road. The only drawback is the back-seat room with the Malibu; main reason? It shares its chassis with the Buick Regal -- a slightly smaller vehicle.

  • @Alprazolam
    @Alprazolam 12 років тому

    I'm a GM guy through and through. And I agree, I'd have the Fusion.

  • @bmwmsport11
    @bmwmsport11 12 років тому

    I don't like how they started the life of this gen of Malibu with a hybrid. All this makes me think is that every Malibu I see, turbo or regular ecotec, is a hybrid.

  • @mb013962
    @mb013962 12 років тому

    Then why do they say the combined number is based on 45% highway, 55% city driving...if that was true they would both get 25

  • @mb013962
    @mb013962 12 років тому

    the malibu turbo and camry v6 have the same city and hwy mpg of 21/30 but the malibu gets 24 combined while the camry gets 25 combined...why is that?

  • @rjayzonfeet
    @rjayzonfeet 12 років тому

    Top speed of the turbo is 155mph and gets abot 37 to 40 mpg.

  • @DStabs720
    @DStabs720 12 років тому

    It's General Motors yo.

  • @trx420fm1
    @trx420fm1 11 років тому

    the Accord is not much faster you might want to research that one again the malibu turbo does 0-60 in 6.3sec and 1/4 in 14.8 and it only has 20+hp less but 20ftlbs more than the v6 accord:)

  • @Brisk2124
    @Brisk2124 12 років тому

    So what now? You want a medal?

  • @MIT2004
    @MIT2004 12 років тому

    ah i dont think you understand simple implications. since gov owns gm shares what do you think happens when a car crashes bc of a defect? NOTHING. you cant sue the gm even if it kills a family member. How do i know? it has happen before

  • @pontiacGXPfan
    @pontiacGXPfan 12 років тому

    If this is Government Motors' best effort, then this car deserves to lose every comparison test. I like Chevy but my patience has been sorely tried of late and it's pretty obvious GM no longer values brand loyalty. I blame the Sonata for showing up with a lame-ass four-pot engine and it turns out Hyundai was inflating their cars' EPA figures. Now the Malibu sticks us with a four-pot that was never a great engine and still isn't. Fuel efficiency is hugely overrated.

  • @mrmaturitydelinquent
    @mrmaturitydelinquent 12 років тому

    This new Malibu is sexy as hell, let's see how it last.
    The very first one (the sedan remake, not the muscle car) was a complete piece of shit!
    The generation after that was OK for rentals, but a piece of shit other than that!
    For this one, I'll keep an eye on it.

  • @rjayzonfeet
    @rjayzonfeet 12 років тому

    Malibu Turbo

  • @MIT2004
    @MIT2004 12 років тому

    government motors no bueno. theres an ethical reason why, can you figure it out

  • @orbits2
    @orbits2 12 років тому

    Bland looking vehicle
    Needs a complete makeover
    Chevy Bow Tie on front grill ruins flowing lines.

  • @MIT2004
    @MIT2004 12 років тому

    i rather get the poor mans aston martin looks better and i trust ford more than chevy

  • @khunopie
    @khunopie 12 років тому

    First like a BOSS!

  • @DStabs720
    @DStabs720 12 років тому

    Okay Negative Nancy...

  • @speedmint
    @speedmint 11 років тому

    the rear end is ugly.