Hitler's Elite Tank Units: The Waffen-SS | Greatest Tank Battles | Timeline

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 жов 2021
  • In 1944, the Allies landed on the northern coast of France. How did the 2nd Canadian Armoured Brigade fight their way inland past a ruthless German defence?
    It's like Netflix for history... Sign up to History Hit, the world's best history documentary service and get 50% off using the code 'TIMELINE' bit.ly/3a7ambu
    You can find more from us on:
    / timelinewh
    / timelinewh
    This channel is part of the History Hit Network. Any queries, please contact owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,8 тис.

  • @2sqnbandit379
    @2sqnbandit379 Рік тому +84

    My grandad was in the Waffen SS panzer division. Nibelungen 38th division. Fought on the eastern front. He conquered the crimea in a month, his tanks rolled into Paris in a fortnight with lightning speed. Incredible man & soldier. My family tried to hide his history in shame but I’m proud of him. I don’t give a toss what people say. It takes balls to be a soldier and he was a part of an elite unit.

    • @daviddalton9214
      @daviddalton9214 Рік тому +20

      Rolled out of Paris even faster, right.

    • @2sqnbandit379
      @2sqnbandit379 Рік тому

      @@daviddalton9214 Haben Sie die Gesellschaft, die Sie wollen, mit Frauen, die sich als Männer verkleiden, Homosexuellen, die Kinder adoptieren, und unkontrollierbarer islamischer Einwanderung, westlichen Frauen vergewaltigen und von Ihrer linken Regierung übersehen werden? War die Niederlage des Deutschen Kaiserreichs wirklich etwas zu feiern?

    • @opoxious1592
      @opoxious1592 Рік тому +12

      @@daviddalton9214 No.
      They stayed in France in over more than 4 years

    • @daveybyrden3936
      @daveybyrden3936 Рік тому +2

      @@daviddalton9214 What are you talking about?

    • @luxboss2388
      @luxboss2388 Рік тому +13

      Hey your grandad fought for his country nothing wrong with that

  • @von-Adler
    @von-Adler Рік тому +204

    I know of a man whose Grandfather drove a tiger at Kursk. His tank was knocked out and two crew of SS Totenkopf rapidly shed their tunics before capture and many years in Russia.
    Many years later still thin as a rake his relatives brought him to Bovington tank museum. When they heard he was a Tiger driver they opened up theirs and this 90 year old spent 15 minutes or so climbing in or out the various hatches

    • @nathanbrown8883
      @nathanbrown8883 Рік тому +17

      very cool. One of my good friends was in the Brandenburger/ Skorzeny Kommando that dressed up as an America GI during the battle of the bulge. My other friend was an officer in the 5th SS division "wiking" and talked freely of fighting the Russians while in group south.

    • @garyhill2740
      @garyhill2740 Рік тому +7

      @@nathanbrown8883 That must've been fascinating. Would have been something to hear first hand. And to be able to ask questions.

    • @daveybyrden3936
      @daveybyrden3936 Рік тому +8

      Totenkopf are recorded as losing 4 Tigers during the two months of the Kursk operation.

    • @paulmorley3032
      @paulmorley3032 Рік тому +7

      I love Bovington Tank Museum, I did my basic training at Bovington. I also recently purchased a newly released English translated Tiger Fibel, being one of the first 3000 to do so my name is in the aknowledgments. the Tiger tank is my fave tank of all time

    • @stevendenny7260
      @stevendenny7260 Рік тому +11

      @@paulmorley3032, last week I watched a documentary on Michael Wittman. Regardless of the politics, Germany had some seriously talented officers.

  • @charlesclager6808
    @charlesclager6808 2 роки тому +274

    When I was 10 years old or so (1954) I asked my dad, who was a navy veteran, why did we win the war ?
    His reply was, and I paraphrase, "Charlie, we could build weapons faster than they could destroy them." His answer was so perfect for a 10 year old mind.
    But as I watch these excellent videos, I see the horrible carnage that his explanation could not include for one so young.

    • @MauriatOttolink
      @MauriatOttolink 2 роки тому +18

      charles clager
      Very interesting, indeed!
      That very same reason was given by Isoroku Yamamoto when he reported back to Japan after Pearl Harbour, as to why he could keep the US Navies busy for only a few weeks.
      " Not enough....Why?"
      Reply "Because I have SEEN Detroit!"
      Your dad was a very wise man!

    • @jeromebarry1741
      @jeromebarry1741 2 роки тому +19

      And to think, the reason Allies won the Bulge battle is that the Axis didn't have the logistics support to get to Antwerp. They ran out of fuel.

    • @williamford8027
      @williamford8027 2 роки тому +7

      then ex SS set up the CIA and ran NASA

    • @MauriatOttolink
      @MauriatOttolink 2 роки тому +8

      @@williamford8027
      I wish that you were joking but .........

    • @foxysupermoto0
      @foxysupermoto0 2 роки тому +12

      Im really sory to say even i love Americans, but you are wrong here if would have been war germans vs usa germans would have won

  • @51515123
    @51515123 2 роки тому +75

    Sgts Cestano and Groff have probably been and seen so much death and carnage in a few years. You can see it in their eyes. Id like to say a special thank you to these men. You were truly heroes and survivors.

  • @luisvaldes1568
    @luisvaldes1568 2 роки тому +95

    My late neighbor David Piker was in the army at the battle. Taken prisoner early in battle when wounded. I will always remember he told me they went over the Rhine River on a wagon, and a lot of the German officers spoke good english. he won the Silver Star earlier in the war.

    • @brandmotivo
      @brandmotivo 2 роки тому +5

      we don't believe you.

    • @austinmartin5446
      @austinmartin5446 2 роки тому +32

      @@brandmotivo who’s we ? Go back to playing video games kid

    • @testdriver3146
      @testdriver3146 2 роки тому +10

      @@brandmotivo I don't believe you.

    • @midnightvibes5485
      @midnightvibes5485 2 роки тому +5

      @@austinmartin5446 A lot of people share fake stories for attention, be aware of that.

    • @MR.MUFFIIN
      @MR.MUFFIIN 2 роки тому +2

      What’s equally impressive is you took the time to talk with him and remember what he said

  • @elisabethandersen1102
    @elisabethandersen1102 2 роки тому +13

    Anyone that wants to honor the memory of WWII veterans, put a candle in your window on night of Nov 11. Its a Northern European tradition that needs to be kept alive.

    • @jussim.konttinen4981
      @jussim.konttinen4981 2 роки тому

      We have this tradition, but it's December 6th in Finland. Also, infamous tiki torches are lit that day. After that, typical christmas:
      ua-cam.com/video/r5m7Ky-Mdxo/v-deo.html

    • @chadmysliviec8449
      @chadmysliviec8449 2 роки тому +3

      That is for World War One. Because the war ended on November 11.

  • @MrDlt123
    @MrDlt123 2 роки тому +92

    "A German Tiger was better than 10 Shermans, but [the Americans] always had 11"
    - German Tiger Ace

    • @solthegamer3769
      @solthegamer3769 2 роки тому +6

      Aces who notoriously lied about their kill counts

    • @fabolousnature3873
      @fabolousnature3873 2 роки тому +6

      @@solthegamer3769 i know us and Russian never accept their fate always tried to claim their legacy

    • @solthegamer3769
      @solthegamer3769 2 роки тому

      @@fabolousnature3873 The Russians didn't accept their fate of what? Getting genocided by the Nazis?

    • @stevelee6283
      @stevelee6283 Рік тому +1

      Easy to build Sherman and easy to train tank crew

    • @2serveand2protect
      @2serveand2protect Рік тому +7

      I love how those myths still persist - even over such an amount of time like the one that passed since the 2ndWW ! :D ...then you go and actually LOOK INTO official statistics and datas about "stricken Shermans" & yadda!-yadda" - and it turns out that in a "Sherman" - even if struck by a shell - you had an 82-85% of survival chance. :D You look on the German tanks and they vary enormously. If you were bunched up in a coffin like the "Hetzer" those chances dropped to less than 15%. In a "Tiger" those odds were about 65-70% of survival (for the Tiger "A"). In a russki T-34 they were less than 30%! XD :D PS. PLUS - you needed to be a "gymnast" to be able to get out of a T-34. :)

  • @sontungle2641
    @sontungle2641 Рік тому +9

    SS-Oberscharfuhrer Enrst Barkmann and SS-Untersturfuhrer Fritz Langanke are the two tank aces with 19 and 82 tank kills on each of them.

  • @daveanderson3805
    @daveanderson3805 2 роки тому +414

    A very good video One complain though the background music was too loud Otherwise good

  • @tomcrutcher3045
    @tomcrutcher3045 2 роки тому +202

    At times, the sound production of this video is a real mess.

    • @bobwild9995
      @bobwild9995 2 роки тому +4

      It's like watching a video game........not for me.

    • @wyldeyouth
      @wyldeyouth 2 роки тому +1

      It's UA-cam that messed it up. This is made for tv

    • @LS-rw9yp
      @LS-rw9yp 2 роки тому +1

      Nope, clean your ears!

    • @davidhuckeby1127
      @davidhuckeby1127 2 роки тому +4

      @@wyldeyouth I remember years ago trying to watch this series on TV. Same mess - couldn't hear what was being said because of the background noise. There were ads every five minutes, and when the program did restart, they repeated a lot of what had had already been shown. I haven't watched TV at all in over ten years and these History Channel shows were one of the reasons - to much investment of time for too little return.

    • @vnovoi
      @vnovoi 2 роки тому +4

      I agree... the sound effects track is too high and overpowers the voiceover. It's frustrating because the information is very well explained. And the animations are really good too for a documentary.
      I believe there is software that can process out (up to a certain level) the effects and the voice, and then it can be re-leveled correctly.

  • @SirPaulus1
    @SirPaulus1 2 роки тому +20

    24:02 This Tiger does not have the original 88mm gun. Its barrel was damaged, it was cut off and replaced with the 75mm barrel from damaged Panther tank. That's why it's so disproportionately short and narrow and doesn't look like 88mm.

  • @chha6439
    @chha6439 2 роки тому +34

    My dad fought in that battle! And lived ! Miss you dad.

    • @AlcoholicBoredom
      @AlcoholicBoredom 2 роки тому +2

      It’s terrible when our fake dads die at places in videos.

    • @chha6439
      @chha6439 2 роки тому +8

      If you’re saying my dad was fake. Far from it . He would be 100 now! I’m 60 my mom is 97 still living! He was in four major battles. Have the four bronze stars for each battle, along with his uniform , and Honorable discharge to prove it. He fought against fascism. And it’s still around for me to fight against.🇺🇸

    • @darylhoskins5696
      @darylhoskins5696 2 роки тому +2

      I believe You Ch Ha ‘ my Father in Law whom Died in 2017 at 92 was With Patton from Africa through to the End , Literally with Him as an Communnications Soldier Wired His Phones and such Command Posts which Moved an Lot! My Own Father whom Passed in 2016 Did not Fight , Was Blinded in one eye as an Child tried to get in Army and Navy .

  • @luiscalcano4359
    @luiscalcano4359 2 роки тому +18

    Actually, the Battle Of The Battle was over in about month a half . Lots of casualties.
    My grandpa was in that battle , got wounded; he was on the USA s 82nd Airborne!

  • @gopalshekar986
    @gopalshekar986 2 роки тому +48

    Excellent video, wow 👏👏
    18:09 terrific to hear from the war veteran - "there may be a lot of talent involved, but it is 50% luck ". What humility 👌
    Greetings from India

    • @789french5
      @789french5 2 роки тому +1

      The only good part about this era of WW2 documentary is the amount of actual veterans talking about their experiences. All the rest is pretty bad, they don't discuss anything regarding logistics, overall doctrine and combined warfare, they over hype German Tigers and their fighting disposition.

    • @entertainme7523
      @entertainme7523 Рік тому

      Good morning sir

  • @rose_city-86o51
    @rose_city-86o51 2 роки тому +66

    This is from the history channel and it’s actually pretty damn old. Unless I’m thinking of something else, but this was when the history channel was actually about history with documentaries and everything. I still love it though

    • @samuelgordino
      @samuelgordino 2 роки тому +14

      Yes, you are right. It's from old history Channel. Low quality documentary but at least no aliens :)

    • @rose_city-86o51
      @rose_city-86o51 2 роки тому

      Simon Colby yea, this didn’t really last all that long did it?

    • @rose_city-86o51
      @rose_city-86o51 2 роки тому +2

      Samuel Gordino lmao 🤣 you got that right. I miss “Mail call” with gunny. I miss the whole older “History channel” in general.

    • @alastair9446
      @alastair9446 2 роки тому +1

      Considering they interviewing verterans from the war i would expect it to be. Veterans from that war are now over 90 if not a 100.

    • @HiTechOilCo
      @HiTechOilCo 2 роки тому

      Old? What does that have to do with it? W.W.II ended 76 years ago, which is far, far older than this video. Because W.W.II ended 76 years ago, (old), does that somehow make it now irrelevant?

  • @davidpennington5607
    @davidpennington5607 2 роки тому +96

    I had grand fathers who fought on both sides, German side Engineers, Allied side Air borne, both survived and both hated war, but mostly authorities

    • @brett76544
      @brett76544 2 роки тому +5

      I can remember talking to my moms uncle (grandfather was too old for WWII) and he captured his cousin. Then I got to talk to his cousin and his father (both in WWII) when I was stationed over there twice in the 1990's. My first father in law ( he was rather old when he remarried) was Gestapo and after she died, my second wife had two grandfathers in the SS and her grandmother still had awards from Himmler over the fire place. All of them are gone now, still seeing all the photos taken in Nuremburg after the war was interesting. None of them I have seen outside the photo albums and my stepson has those now.

    • @r.m.5548
      @r.m.5548 2 роки тому +2

      That's great and all but the damage your grandparents did was already done. It doesn't matter how they feel about it after, they still contributed to war and death willingly. Disgusting.

    • @requettie
      @requettie 2 роки тому +17

      @@r.m.5548 Incredibly insensitive for you to say that. Shameful.

    • @r.m.5548
      @r.m.5548 2 роки тому +1

      @@requettie let's go Brandon!

    • @DogeickBateman
      @DogeickBateman 2 роки тому +9

      @@r.m.5548 Okay boomer.

  • @floridasoldat
    @floridasoldat 2 роки тому +276

    Bit of info- when you hear about Sherman guns penetrating the frontal armor of Tigers, it’s the new Shermans with the 76mm guns delivered in early 1944 that could do that. Not all Shermans had those guns- all the older ones had 75mm guns which could not penetrate Tigers’ frontal armor.

    • @pantherace1000
      @pantherace1000 2 роки тому +45

      The number of Tigers encountered by US Army forces in North Western Europe was very low.
      Zaloga was able to find five encounters where units equipped with Tigers were in the same location as US Armor in or around the same date in North Western Europe. Of these five encounters US Armor came out on top three of the five times (to be fair though one of the encounters was a platoon of Tigers being loaded on to flat cars when a platoon of M18s came across them....so not much of a fight).

    • @zillsburyy1
      @zillsburyy1 2 роки тому +12

      a sherman could knock out a panther. a tiger, not so much

    • @alt7488
      @alt7488 2 роки тому +11

      tiger 2's where often mistaken for the panthers as they looked very similar,
      especially from a distance

    • @lolofblitz6468
      @lolofblitz6468 2 роки тому +4

      @Tommy Sands panther got better armor than tiger where did you got that information you idiot

    • @alt7488
      @alt7488 2 роки тому +7

      @Damo the firefly
      was a British only tank,
      the yanks deemed the 75 and 76 mm guns as adequate and
      viewed the 6 pounder as to big and bulky
      for the Sherman turret

  • @gar50172
    @gar50172 2 роки тому +230

    It’s actually quite impressive holding off so many armies for multiple years

    • @jerryjeromehawkins1712
      @jerryjeromehawkins1712 Рік тому +41

      Agree. Prewar Germany was roughly the size of the state of Montana... going up against the world's largest countries.

    • @entertainme7523
      @entertainme7523 Рік тому +32

      The longer the war = the more money is made for all the manufacturing firms and the millionaires that own them
      Keep that in mind 😉

    • @syncmonism
      @syncmonism Рік тому +7

      Wars on that large of a scale tend to take a long time, regardless of how poorly one side performs vs. the other.

    • @wolflarsen1900
      @wolflarsen1900 Рік тому +13

      ​@@syncmonism not in the slightest. and thas why for example the biggest army in the world, the french army, lost and totally collapsed in a few single weeks. if you consider that as tending to last long with a stunningly poor performance, how much time did you expect for all of that countries, 10 hours?

    • @the.parks.of.no.return
      @the.parks.of.no.return Рік тому +1

      They would massacre whole villages.

  • @infectious420
    @infectious420 2 роки тому +4

    This was your best episode ever of Greatest Tank Battles. Thank you.

  • @garyhill2740
    @garyhill2740 Рік тому +8

    They say Allied soldiers often mistook other panzers for Tigers.
    I believe when the tanker at about 9:20 describes the "great big tank" with a "reinforced front" advancing, "laying down trees" as it went, and shrugging off seven direct hits, he knew what he was looking at. Pretty sure it wasn't a MkIV.

  • @treebirds536
    @treebirds536 2 роки тому +4

    Hi ! Thank you very much for your video illustrating the model of heavy artillery ! Amazing but scary !

  • @MorrisNicebrain
    @MorrisNicebrain 2 роки тому +57

    How come the music and sound effects are so much louder than the speech in videos uploaded on this channel? Are they edited or is that how they have always been?

    • @leaf16nut
      @leaf16nut 2 роки тому +4

      Sounds good here, maybe just your ears 🤷‍♂️

    • @haman_k
      @haman_k 2 роки тому +1

      +

    • @TheTryingDutchman
      @TheTryingDutchman 2 роки тому +6

      I have the same problem, the volumes are way off. Music is basicly mixed way to loud

    • @chooyongming110
      @chooyongming110 2 роки тому +1

      This video is war stories series taking the old greatest tank battles series

    • @wyldeyouth
      @wyldeyouth 2 роки тому

      It's because this is mixed for TV not youtube

  • @kenflagler635
    @kenflagler635 Рік тому +2

    Love the docs with the animated tanks,or CG tanks. Whatever they are, they are great.Thanks guys !😎😎😎

  • @CS-ir9mo
    @CS-ir9mo 2 роки тому +4

    Thank you to everyone that shared there stories for this.

  • @falconward6757
    @falconward6757 2 роки тому +80

    I don't like or watch this channel but I was driven to watch this one episode because of how important this battle was to my life. My father, an American infantryman in the Battle of the Bulge, was struck in the head by a fragment from one of these German tank shells that hit near him. His helmet saved his life, but the injury put him in the hospital with a severe concussion and kept him off the front lines for the rest of the battle and the war. Of course, I wouldn't be here if that tank shell had killed my dad or if he wasn't knocked out of action, kept fighting on the front lines and became one of the 19,000 American fatalities in that bloodbath.
    However, that trauma changed his life, and as a result, the life of his wife and his 7 kids. Although it wasn't recognized as a mental illness at the time, my father suffered from PTSD for the rest of his life, and we suffered through our childhoods as a result. Examples of how that trauma consumed him: the only movies he ever watched on TV or took us to see were WWII movies, the great majority in the European theater of the war; he collected so many WWII books, he ended up with the largest collection in the whole state - even more than any library; he brought back a complete German infantry uniform and an SS officer uniform and always wore one of them to costume parties. That last one in particular really freaked us out because we had seen so many films about the horrors of the Nazi's, especially the SS! Seeing your father, 6 foot 6 inches tall, 240 pounds of muscle, in one of those black SS uniforms, including the SS hat and boots, is a memory that doesn't fade away with time - terrifying! My poor mother had to accompany him to those parties. I have watched a few vids and films about the Battle of the Bulge to help me try to understand my father and the attitudes and behaviors he passed down to me and my siblings.
    [This channel is on my blacklist because I am very irritated by how they backtrack and repeat so much after each point where they had a commercial break. This and other things feel like they add unnecessary length to their shows to fill the time slot - these could be well done in just 30 min. In addition, they rely too much on animation and not enough on historical footage.]

    • @fh.7287
      @fh.7287 2 роки тому +6

      I honestly can still feel the trauma, the unsettled effects in you till today.
      I wish i could heal the deep scar.
      But just remember, you're not alone !

    • @urdude67
      @urdude67 2 роки тому +6

      I thank you for your post. I think you have processed your Dad’s history very well and you are healthy. The SS especially the waffen arm, fascinate because they were so intense and well armed. And perhaps unique in being ideological as well as professional military force. Many people separate them from the ones running camps and policing society.

    • @shawnydAB
      @shawnydAB 2 роки тому +2

      @@urdude67 77⁷

    • @scottf5791
      @scottf5791 2 роки тому +4

      Wow that’s a very a insightful account of you father and the lasting affects the war had not only on him but the rest of your family. Thank you for sharing.

    • @thehabit635
      @thehabit635 2 роки тому +2

      Cool story. Nobody cares

  • @reginaldmcnab3265
    @reginaldmcnab3265 Рік тому +17

    The German soldier was resolute! Regardless of the numerical advantage of the enemy! Duty and discipline was at his core

    • @jeffersondavis2530
      @jeffersondavis2530 10 місяців тому

      So true ! And I have heard German soldiers say the same of the Russians .

    • @Boomhauersdad
      @Boomhauersdad 7 місяців тому

      It’s called brainwash

  • @Karan1901
    @Karan1901 Рік тому +8

    Huge respect for the known & unknown fallen or survived soldiers!!
    thank you love from india ♥️

  • @Stobus44
    @Stobus44 2 роки тому +11

    11:09 not only the Iron Cross but just as the hero Kreßmann he was awarded the Knights Cross of the Iron Cross.

  • @stevefowler2112
    @stevefowler2112 2 роки тому +31

    By 1944 on the western front, it was no longer even a fair fight...The allies had total air supremacy and movement by any German units (armored or not) meant near instant death from the sky. The Germans couldn't move their forces around on the battle field to react to the Allied movements. the war was already a fait accompli at that point.

    • @markbantz9699
      @markbantz9699 2 роки тому +1

      Who wants a fair fight! It was the Nazis!

    • @stevefowler2112
      @stevefowler2112 2 роки тому +10

      @@markbantz9699 most of the German people were not Nazis nor was most of the army. i still think we fought the wrong people

    • @seanohare5488
      @seanohare5488 Рік тому +1

      True

    • @maxcristi6493
      @maxcristi6493 Рік тому +1

      @@stevefowler2112 As someone from europe that knows from other people how harsh communism was I completely agree that you fought the wrong people ,some of your generals said that too ,Patton as an example

  • @ronemtae3468
    @ronemtae3468 2 роки тому +61

    Here’s a small fact it always seems to get lost it’s the reason the allies were able to push back the offensive made by Germany
    After tremendous success in the number of battles in the Pacific theater the new weapon was brought to Germany
    Early on the morning of December 16, 1944, the commander of the U.S. 406th Artillery Group, Colonel George Axelson, had a difficult decision to make. The Germans had just launched the offensive that would become known as the Battle of the Bulge, and one of their first targets was the 38th Cavalry Squadron, dug in around Monschau, Germany. The lightly armed cavalry troopers needed help, and the commander quickly called for artillery support from the 406th. Axelson had just the thing: a new, secret artillery shell that had just been issued. The problem was that Allied commander Dwight Eisenhower had not yet given permission to use the weapon. Axelson decided that the emergency trumped the restrictions and ordered his gunners to use the new shell. Minutes later, rounds equipped with a new radio proximity fuse started exploding right over the heads of the attacking Germans. The attack collapsed.

    • @Mr.Deleterious
      @Mr.Deleterious Рік тому +5

      That's a large fact. A very large fact.

    • @jamesgoldring1052
      @jamesgoldring1052 Рік тому +2

      @@Mr.Deleterious truly a lightbulb moment for the germans

    • @michaeltelson9798
      @michaeltelson9798 Рік тому +1

      Charles McDonald mentioned that it was first used at the battle of the Three villages east of St. Vith. He led an infantry company there (see his book “Company Commander “) his later book “A Time for Trumpets “ is considered the definitive book on the Battle of the Bulge. He stayed in service and retired as a US Army historian.

    • @dutchhoke6555
      @dutchhoke6555 Рік тому +2

      US Artillary seldom gets a comprehensive treatment, like other technologies do.
      101st had managed for a change, to bring their divisional artillary along to Bastogne. Well sited and augmented by stray batteries, tanks, TDs, and a MLR of
      elite paratroopers,
      a maelstrom would be provided for attackers entering the town from any
      direction. Ike's doubletiming 2 AB
      divs to battle by every truck in ETO
      is in itself legendary. Combined arms, artillary included, stopped Germans at Noville long enough to deploy effectively at Bastogne.

    • @Todd3246
      @Todd3246 Рік тому +1

      I always thought that apart from running out of ammo and fuel, it was when the weather cleared and the fighters and bombers launched that sounded the death knells of the advance.

  • @MisteriosGloriosos922
    @MisteriosGloriosos922 2 роки тому +1

    *A very good video !! I liked and Subscribed to your channel*

  • @adrielbarrios4559
    @adrielbarrios4559 2 роки тому +165

    Unbelievable what all these men went through. Both side

    • @cyrosubod2317
      @cyrosubod2317 2 роки тому +7

      Yah with a terrible condition in the battlefield

    • @thelokiway4478
      @thelokiway4478 2 роки тому +12

      I can't even imagine. For the American tanks; you're in a tank you know cannot stand toe to toe with the Tiger tanks. For the German tanks/soldiers; you know this is one of the last chances you will have to at least slow the allies on the western front are running out of two of the most important things on a modern battlefield; men and fuel.

    • @adrielbarrios4559
      @adrielbarrios4559 2 роки тому +4

      Way447 100% it must have been a crazy time and eventually om both sides. Both sides fought and did what they were asked bravely.

    • @ultrametric9317
      @ultrametric9317 2 роки тому +3

      @@thelokiway4478 German tanker casualties were far higher than Allied - not even comparable. I'd rather be in a Sherman thanks. Also - the majority of tanks destroyed were by infantry with anti-tank weapons (bazookas and Panzerfausts). Being able to maneuver and having strength in numbers and infantry support - not to mention air support - is far more important. The idea of one-on-one battles between tanks is just the video gamer's idea of a battlefield.

    • @noonenoone1628
      @noonenoone1628 2 роки тому +4

      Other side deserved what they got

  • @numerian4516
    @numerian4516 2 роки тому +14

    I try to read several comments before watching these vids. You learn so much from individuals that a documentary can’t/doesn’t tell you.

    • @HiTechOilCo
      @HiTechOilCo 2 роки тому +1

      With these videos, many of the comments are from armchair General kids who play online tank video games and think they know it all.

    • @numerian4516
      @numerian4516 2 роки тому

      @@HiTechOilCo True, many but not all. Just have to have more common sense than the chair to weed through them.

  • @davidbraxton1725
    @davidbraxton1725 2 роки тому +3

    This is outstanding history. Thank you

  • @TheDillberto
    @TheDillberto 2 роки тому +1

    This is an amazing video representation of these events

  • @HistorySkills
    @HistorySkills 2 роки тому +2

    Interesting. Need to learn more about this.

  • @serdarmehter8663
    @serdarmehter8663 2 роки тому +7

    King tiger is such a handsome tank.

  • @gpan62
    @gpan62 2 роки тому +52

    FYI, this is an episode of the "Greatest Tank Battles" series. It was a Canadian production by Breakthrough Entertainment which also did "For King & Empire" (Canada in WW1) and "For King & Country" (Canada in WW2). It was first shown on History Channel Canada in 2011. It was shown on the Military Channel in the US and in various countries around the world.

    • @hauntedmoodylady
      @hauntedmoodylady 2 роки тому +12

      I recommend if you make another video you cease with the annoying loud noise/music, it is far more important to hear voices..

    • @mikelyon6449
      @mikelyon6449 2 роки тому +2

      That is disappointing. I thought I was seeing something new.

    • @hoosierpatriot2280
      @hoosierpatriot2280 2 роки тому +3

      So what? I don't care who made it or where I'm seeing it. It's good.

    • @anthonysmith3851
      @anthonysmith3851 2 роки тому +3

      The audio mix is poor, the original German dialogue drowns out the English overdub and the music and effects track drown out the narration. Very amateurish work. Where was the director during the session? Too bad for an otherwise outstanding piece.

    • @AlcoholicBoredom
      @AlcoholicBoredom 2 роки тому +1

      We literally all know that this (and other) UA-cam videos are relicensed TV shows. Also water is wet, as long as we’re pointing out obviously things.

  • @raywhitehead730
    @raywhitehead730 2 роки тому +11

    At the time of this battle, the Allies already had just about 3 million men in theatre..not counting the Russians.. No wonder the Allies thought the Germans were finished... The main Allied problem was getting supplies fast enough to the front..the surrender was just about 5 months away

    • @isaiasgonzalez2271
      @isaiasgonzalez2271 Рік тому

      Are you not counting the Russians to make the Germans look bad or something lol? The Russians lost atleast 14 million men dead

  • @zew1414
    @zew1414 2 роки тому +4

    That 88 was utterly devastating! And it was Rommel who figured out it made a perfect tank killer because it's an anti-aircraft gun but starting at Torbruk, he pointed at the British Matilda tanks and that gun just blew them apart! So they started producing the gun to fit into their new tanks. Please lmk if I'm wrong but I don't think I am. Cheers! Great doc. ✌️

    • @Abensberg
      @Abensberg Рік тому

      actually yes, you are wrong... the 88 was a "multi purpose gun" and was designed to also use AP grenades.
      it was used as a AT-gun as early as 1940 against france. but it was also designed for usage against fortified positions (maginot line for example).

    • @Humbulla93
      @Humbulla93 Рік тому

      another fun fact: the yuguoslav partisans used a sherman and mounted a PAK 40 on it. oh and did you know that rommel prior to being the "desert fox" fought in the 1st WW in the mountains, he captured 7000 italian soldiers with only 100 men. battle of caporetto 1917

  • @JB-nf2rc
    @JB-nf2rc Рік тому +26

    Fun fact, the Sherman's crew had a 97% survival rate during the war because ease of escape.

    • @2sqnbandit379
      @2sqnbandit379 Рік тому +4

      Tommie cookers for our Tigers.

    • @Nonamearisto
      @Nonamearisto Рік тому +1

      @@2sqnbandit379 The Tiger was a heavy tank, the Sherman was medium. Apples and oranges. A fair comparison would be between the Tiger or even the King Tiger versus the Pershing.

    • @2sqnbandit379
      @2sqnbandit379 Рік тому +2

      @@Nonamearisto Even those were no match for the Tiger. However the Americans could mass produce them. I think we only built 800 Tigers & only 400 Tiger 2. America & England built thousands

    • @Nonamearisto
      @Nonamearisto Рік тому +1

      @@2sqnbandit379 The Pershing could take a Tiger or King Tiger on one to one.

    • @2sqnbandit379
      @2sqnbandit379 Рік тому +1

      @@Nonamearisto even from the front?

  • @ricksturdevant2901
    @ricksturdevant2901 2 роки тому +12

    It is a shame the people that made this video didn't think ( in several places on this video ) to keep the battle noises as background when the veterans are recounting their experiences. Video is well made EXCEPT you would think the veterans comments would take absolute presidence in volume over the silly and tooooooo loud battle noises

  • @Rabmac1UK
    @Rabmac1UK 2 роки тому

    Nice Video, Well Done. That said, like in American TV, to many repeats of scenes previously in the earlier parts of the video. Thanks for publishing

  • @JB-nf2rc
    @JB-nf2rc Рік тому +2

    I love how they are using the chinstrap panther for this which just shows their dedication to detail

  • @cwcsquared
    @cwcsquared Рік тому +3

    The advantage of the 88 was the fact it could destroy other tanks at stand off ranges. Out of range of opponents weapons.

  • @salto1994
    @salto1994 2 роки тому +11

    great video, but would it be possible to have it re-uploaded with the voices a bit louder, i sometimes have issues hearing the speech over the tank fire sound or background noises. Thank you :)

    • @ricksturdevant2901
      @ricksturdevant2901 2 роки тому +1

      I agree with Gregory Martin, you would think the comments of living veterans from the battle would take presidence over the cheezy battle noises

  • @publiusscipioafricanus6475
    @publiusscipioafricanus6475 9 місяців тому +1

    I think my grandpa was an electrician during WW2. His uniform has two lightning bolts :D

  • @timothyhines7845
    @timothyhines7845 2 роки тому +44

    The noise was too loud. It completely over bears the oratory of the survivors in too many places.
    Historically this fight would have been prevented had ONE ego maniac i.e George Patton been ignored on the issue of final development of the Pershing tank prior to the Normandy invasion or at bare minimum the up gunning of the Shermans to the high velocity 76mm. That would have saved thousands of American lives.

    • @philiphorner31
      @philiphorner31 2 роки тому +1

      Like Trump, the powers that be hated Patton.

    • @cambuurleeuwarden
      @cambuurleeuwarden 2 роки тому +9

      @@philiphorner31 I mean, I like to bash Trump as much as the next guy. But your sentence is so ludicrous I just had to respond.
      When has trump ever stated he hated Patton?

    • @brett9675
      @brett9675 2 роки тому +1

      @@cambuurleeuwarden LET'S GO BRANDON!!!!!!!!

    • @followthegrow108
      @followthegrow108 2 роки тому +2

      @@cambuurleeuwarden Trump was the last real president since Reagan. Bushes were pawns and corrupt, Osama Obama was corrupt to the bone and incompetent, almost as much as Bush. Biden is lost. Let's go Brandon.

    • @davepritchard283
      @davepritchard283 2 роки тому

      Ah well nevermind.....at least they got to use the Pershings to make the film as King Tigers lol!

  • @antcaruso3465
    @antcaruso3465 2 роки тому +19

    Ah yes...classic from the History Channel about 20 years ago

    • @Big-Reds
      @Big-Reds 2 роки тому +4

      Right?! So true!! Nothing but swamp people and pawn shops! Wtf

    • @evanbenge3201
      @evanbenge3201 2 роки тому +1

      This was also ahc

    • @johnmn3500
      @johnmn3500 2 роки тому +1

      What you don't like swamp people or hoarding wars??

    • @Big-Reds
      @Big-Reds 2 роки тому +3

      @@johnmn3500To be honest, no, I don't like those shows, I've watched them but I'll turn it off...

  • @andreasleonardo6793
    @andreasleonardo6793 2 роки тому +3

    Excellent video about tanks battles between 6 army of USA & selective unions of SS Nazism regime unites...both sides didactic furious attack.....several classes of 6 army units participated against German tanks columns and comrade infantry units...thanks for sending...excellent historical channel 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

  • @conceptalfa
    @conceptalfa 2 роки тому

    Great documentary!!! 👍 👍 👍

  • @Oooo-bi7bi
    @Oooo-bi7bi Рік тому

    Another great show from a quality channel.

  • @noahhess4955
    @noahhess4955 2 роки тому +20

    Love this! But I wish the talking was a bit louder

  • @catman8670
    @catman8670 2 роки тому +11

    Unless I had the very best tank equipped with the largest most devastating guns, I’d rather be an infantry soldier

    • @w.p8960
      @w.p8960 2 роки тому

      Per Bill Mauldin. A WWII 2 Army cartoonist. A movin foxhole attracts the eye.

    • @joethekinghawk7514
      @joethekinghawk7514 2 роки тому

      I agree, I wouldn't want to be cooked in those iron coffins.

    • @Tom_Cruise_Missile
      @Tom_Cruise_Missile 2 роки тому

      Bad news, you're going in a death trap of a German tank. No, the armor did NOT increase your odds of survival.

  • @phillipsmith4501
    @phillipsmith4501 Рік тому +2

    It is really good to have these personal testimonies for the benefit of future generations how brave and fearless to come up against those King tigers like they did such a incredible generation .

  • @ricklayeux5688
    @ricklayeux5688 2 роки тому

    Very well done video.

  • @lawrencemyers3623
    @lawrencemyers3623 2 роки тому +3

    Video was inaccurate in a few spots: at 16:30 the M5 3 inch gun was discussed, but what appeared was a 57mm AT gun.
    There were Tiger IIs of the 501st SS Heavy Tank Battalion with KG Peiper, but no Tiger Is. As a matter of fact, Peiper didn't really want them at all due to their being too large and heavy for the "roads" (some of which were really farm lanes) and bridges.
    I believe few, if any, Tiger Is even took part in the Bulge.
    There was no mention of the 2nd Infantry Division at the Twin Villages (Rocherath-Krinkelt), specifically the 38th and 9th IRs which were very much involved in the fighting.
    The 2nd SS Panzer wasn't halted at Manhay and actually got into the town on Christmas Eve (Barkmann's Ride), severely mauling Rosenbaum's CCA of the 7th Armored in the fighting. There was some confusion between the 3rd Armored and 7th Armored as to who was responsible for the town's defense as it laid right on the boundary between the 2 divisions. Second SS held the town and repulsed an attack by 7th Armored on Christmas Day with heavy losses. They were halted to the west at Grandmenil by the 75th Division and withdrew from the area shortly thereafter.
    If memory serves, I think Rosenbaum was relieved of command in early January '45.

  • @patwilson2546
    @patwilson2546 2 роки тому +5

    Tiger I had 100mm front and 80mm side armor. 75mm Sherman had a tough time at any angle. 76mm Sherman could penetrate the front from close range and the side from mid range. The Firefly (17 pdr or 76.2mm but much better muzzle velocity than the US 76mm) could kill a Tiger from any angle. Both the 76mm and Firefly were mixed into Sherman units at a ratio of 1 to 3 75mm armed Shermans. The 75mm was more common because it was actually better at everything except anti tank combat.

    • @chadjustice8560
      @chadjustice8560 2 роки тому

      The 76mm could penetrate anywhere on the tiger 1 from combat range which according to every report was 500 yards and under. The 75mm could kill almost everything on the battlefield outside tiger 2. A 75mm killed Whitman.

  • @basedaf5580
    @basedaf5580 2 роки тому

    excellent documentary

  • @johnjacobs1625
    @johnjacobs1625 Рік тому

    Awesome Guys! JJ

  • @michaeltelson9798
    @michaeltelson9798 Рік тому +3

    A fact that few realize that at Bastogne, the 101st was basically a short corps (4 regiment ms instead of the usual 3)as it absorbed much of the Corps artillery units based around Bastogne and parts of two Armored Divisions, and group SNAFU (remnants of retreating units).
    Up north the 82nd Airborne brought along their secret weapon. Panzer Fausts. They have captured and used them since Sicily.
    This video emphasizes the Tiger II more than it was worth. It broke down easily, and more kept in reserve.
    Peiper missed a lightly defended fuel depot that was guarded by a company of Belgium Foresters who put up a barrier of burning barrels of fuel.
    At La Gleize one factor that the video doesn’t talk Stu’s that the 82nd Airborne found a M12 SPG sitting in a depot, ready to use. They moved it to a heights and started shelling Peiper’s positions with 155mm artillery shells directly fired. With little or no fuel and diminished ammunition Peiper abandoned his vehicles and retreated on foot into the night.

  • @johnlansing2902
    @johnlansing2902 2 роки тому +26

    Having known veterans who fought in European theater of operations they told me that it was a very tough war but after the Malmedy massacre it was a crusade and damn personal .

    • @sozialistischespatientenko3797
      @sozialistischespatientenko3797 2 роки тому +11

      For many German veterans it was damn personal before. Imagine family members being killed by Allied bombing, your house in ruins. You don't need any pep talk to be motivated to fight to the very end.

    • @evanbenge3201
      @evanbenge3201 2 роки тому +1

      Would like to join the 🪖 🎖 if i was born before ww2

    • @dirtyd2316
      @dirtyd2316 2 роки тому +8

      @@sozialistischespatientenko3797 To be fair they should have been mad to their leader for getting them into a war over a lie.

    • @DogeickBateman
      @DogeickBateman 2 роки тому

      @Last chance Cowboy Everything else following that damn sure was.

    • @DogeickBateman
      @DogeickBateman 2 роки тому

      @Last chance Cowboy Unprovoked. Don't you start pulling that "last defenders of Evropa" larp cringe.

  • @katherinecollins4685
    @katherinecollins4685 2 роки тому

    Well researched

  • @alexdelarge209
    @alexdelarge209 2 роки тому +2

    V. interesting & informative, but it would be better to match the war footage ('King' Tiger II's) with the animation (Tiger I's). The halftrack/AT use & explanation is superb.

  • @stevemazz3121
    @stevemazz3121 2 роки тому +3

    Just a little info about the Tiger II...Looking at the blueprints of the Tiger II we see the front armor is sloped at 30 degrees, the upper section being 150mm the lower section being 100mm while the underside for a third of the way back is 40mm then reduced to 25mm to the back armor running up at 30 degrees and 80mm thick. The front section of the turret was 185mm... I don't see exact side armor measurements but they appear to be 80mm with 40mm decks.

    • @stevemazz3121
      @stevemazz3121 2 роки тому

      Lucky for the allies only 489 of the Tiger II tanks were completed or put into service from 1942-1945.

    • @Senaleb
      @Senaleb Рік тому

      The tigers and kings were able to be killed by bouncing rounds off the ground. Since the undercarriage of the tank was thin.

  • @baystgrp
    @baystgrp 2 роки тому +31

    Pronunciation hint: the W in “Waffen SS” is prounounced as V. So “Vaffen SS” is correct. Great video. Thanks.

    • @cr0vv575
      @cr0vv575 2 роки тому +3

      Hab ich noch nie gehört wie kommst du darauf mann spricht doch ein W aus

    • @mark3427
      @mark3427 2 роки тому +4

      . . The only reason it's pronounced as a V is because the German accent struggles to pronounce the letter W . . . It is Waffen

    • @cr0vv575
      @cr0vv575 2 роки тому +5

      @@mark3427 I don't know a single german that can't pronounce a W the way it's supposed to

    • @mark3427
      @mark3427 2 роки тому +2

      @@cr0vv575 I live and work in Germany . . They also struggle with the 'th' sound . . As the pronounce it using the letter z . . This sounds like zis. . . The sounds like zee . . What sounds like Vot

    • @cr0vv575
      @cr0vv575 2 роки тому +2

      @@mark3427 well maybe some can't pronounce the "th" in english that is Waffen is a german word and no one here would pronounce the 'W' like a 'V'. I am german l, was born in germany and spent my entire life up until now in germany

  • @stephenobrien5909
    @stephenobrien5909 Рік тому +4

    The main killer of tanks were anti tank guns, followed by hand held infantry weapons such as the PIAT, Panzerfuast and US Bazooka.

  • @kristov29
    @kristov29 2 роки тому

    Ignoring the horrible audio mix, the first hand accounts from both sides, as well as the CG recreations of actual events, made this well worth watching.

  • @Senaleb
    @Senaleb Рік тому +13

    The US was so strong because of 1 simple thing. The 1/2 ton truck. We produced thousands and thousands of them. They could carry AT guns, Food, Fuel and ammo quickly to the front. The germans were using horses still. We gave thousands to the Soviet army and that allowed them to keep following the german retreat all the way back to Berlin.

    • @brucecamparmament3728
      @brucecamparmament3728 Рік тому +1

      By this time, the Germans had plenty of 3 tonn trucks, so idk.

    • @lukeh2440
      @lukeh2440 Рік тому +1

      1/2 tonne truck? That’s the weight of a jeep

    • @judgedredd8876
      @judgedredd8876 Рік тому +1

      Americans had the 2.5 ton GMC 6x6 trucks mass produced whereas in the German truck design philosophy even a 4x4 was oddly a novelty.

  • @azazelzel6954
    @azazelzel6954 2 роки тому +12

    The British Sherman Firefly Varriant fitted with a more powerful 3-inch (76.2 mm) calibre British 17-pounder anti-tank gun as its main weapon could stop a Tigar or Panzer IV, but only 600 Shermans (as far as I know) were converted.

    • @jasonbowen7508
      @jasonbowen7508 Рік тому

      Yes but you had to get quite close even with the Firefly. Whereas a Tiger could still knock you out from about a mile haha.

  • @davidschaadt3460
    @davidschaadt3460 2 роки тому +2

    In the 1980's ,I saw my father Drunk ,crying on the porch saying about his friends from high School 4-5 of them who burned up in their tanks .That's the first time I ever seen him cry.

    • @duanehall205
      @duanehall205 2 роки тому +1

      God Bless Your Father+all those that fought and gave their Lives for the "Freedom we have Today. Those Hereos will Never Be Forgotten"

    • @davidschaadt3460
      @davidschaadt3460 2 роки тому +2

      @@duanehall205 thank you .So many of those bad memories you just can't shake off.

    • @guymorris6596
      @guymorris6596 Рік тому

      Thank you from myself, honorably discharged US Army since 1991, to your father and his friends for their service. It doesn't go unnoticed and they don't walk alone.

  • @krisray779
    @krisray779 Рік тому

    Thanks!

  • @makara80
    @makara80 2 роки тому +11

    Fun if otherwise worthless fact: the zeltbahn-wearing Waffen SS panzer grenadier depicted in the thumbnail has been ‘borrowed’ from the 1990 book ‘Waffen SS Uniforms in Colour Photographs’ by Andrew Steven and Peter Amodio. The book is a showcase of modern reenactors bedecked in authentic SS militaria….
    Well now you know. ;)

  • @harleyblue999
    @harleyblue999 Рік тому +3

    Bloody marvellous such brave men,I have had a wonderful life these last 75 years thanks to all that gave so much for me to have a life.

  • @krisfrederick5001
    @krisfrederick5001 2 роки тому +13

    "Tommy Cookers." WHAT? Good thing I already know what happens. 🔇

    • @mark3427
      @mark3427 2 роки тому +1

      The Sherman was also called the Ronson after the cigarette lighter. . . . Because it lights first time, every time.

    • @dillonmcconnell2592
      @dillonmcconnell2592 2 роки тому

      @@mark3427 the Sherman also wiped out the t 34 and went on to fight modern Russian tanks up till the 80s.

  • @dasparado
    @dasparado 2 роки тому

    Good video

  • @mikkel066h
    @mikkel066h 2 роки тому +36

    The Battle of the Bulge was as devastating on German ground equipment as their operation Bodenplatte was to their Airforce. It were pretty much sending large amount of equipment down the drain, while the goal of those operations would've never been a reality even if they achieved their goals in those operations. It was simply so late in the war the allies would never surrender and they had a massive surplus of equipment to replace their losses, while Germany couldn't.
    The only difference it would make in the end of the day was how much the Soviets were to get of Europe after the war.

    • @mellzym8598
      @mellzym8598 2 роки тому +4

      Thank you

    • @joethekinghawk7514
      @joethekinghawk7514 2 роки тому +4

      So true. All those young men died for nothing on the German side.

    • @jan22150
      @jan22150 2 роки тому +5

      @@joethekinghawk7514 remember they were defending their homeland in the end. Their moral was different when they defended their homeland.

    • @badmonkey2222
      @badmonkey2222 2 роки тому +4

      @@jan22150 they were cowards who could not think for themselves, if they wouldn't have followed their megalomaniac leader illegally invading every country and their brother murdering millions of innocent civilians they wouldn't have had to defend their Homeland.

    • @jorgemaiz7624
      @jorgemaiz7624 Рік тому +1

      @@nicks2581 The Germans had 64 divisions in the West (not counting Norway) in April 1944. Half were static "fortress" divisions that were immobile with little combat value. 10 were Panzer and PG divisions. The addition of 30 proper divisions on the Eastern front is insufficient to force the Soviets to make peace. It would have been enough to prevent a collapse of the front from Operation Bagration and to hold their positions elsewhere. The only way the Germans could have won a decent peace was to defeat the D-Day invasion to free them of the threat of a major attack in the West for probably two years. In that time they could shuttled most of their forces East and fought to a stalemate at best.
      More than anything this should illustrate how futile the German war effort was after 1943. Nothing short of rolling a perfect six would have given Germany even a honorable peace based on status quo antebellum. They were simply too short of oil, men and material to win.

  • @SJam491
    @SJam491 2 роки тому +10

    Too bad Peiper didn't live long enough to be interviewed for this documentary.

    • @daveJDB
      @daveJDB 2 роки тому +4

      That would've been rather interesting, only if he wasn't killed lol.

    • @maconescotland8996
      @maconescotland8996 2 роки тому +1

      @@daveJDB Peiper wasn't killed in WW2.

    • @daveJDB
      @daveJDB 2 роки тому

      @@maconescotland8996 I know lol, I don't think I was even saying that?

    • @maconescotland8996
      @maconescotland8996 2 роки тому +1

      @@daveJDB I wasn't sure either.

    • @daveJDB
      @daveJDB 2 роки тому

      @@maconescotland8996 Ah, alright.

  • @panzerfast5000
    @panzerfast5000 Рік тому +2

    They call it "Tiger Terror" Most historians agree Allied reporting of tiger tanks on the Western Front far exceeds the number of German Tigers actually on the Western Front.

    • @XtreeM_FaiL
      @XtreeM_FaiL Рік тому +1

      Most "Tigers" were Pz IVs or something else.
      Tiger's reputation was so effective that many times allied attack were halted when they tought there is a Tiger, even when there were none.
      Germany made only 1400 Tigers and one estimation was that any given time Germany had max. 400 working Tigers.

  • @mohammedsaysrashid3587
    @mohammedsaysrashid3587 2 роки тому +2

    A nice tanks battel video shared by excellent historical channel (German operation was Mobilized among Internal destruction & highly speed declines in every where around & inside Germany .in other side defensive operation of US 6 army was stood front Huge Logistic powerful ability & Victory Moral of D-Day landing ...too enjoyment video thanks

  • @coolbreeze2.0-mortemadfasc13
    @coolbreeze2.0-mortemadfasc13 2 роки тому +13

    10:15 he's missing half his leg.

    • @wilsonhuber
      @wilsonhuber 2 роки тому +1

      nothing wrong with your eyesight!

    • @floriangeyer3454
      @floriangeyer3454 2 роки тому +5

      the scene is from the battle for Cologne. The Sherman was knocked out by a Panther near the cathrdral. The Panther was destroyed by a Pershing a couple of minutes later. The wounded tanker died later. The battle is well documented.

    • @floriangeyer3454
      @floriangeyer3454 2 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/cHs5RI9zaiQ/v-deo.html

    • @kevinbabu8919
      @kevinbabu8919 2 роки тому +1

      @@floriangeyer3454 That Pershing was Eagle 7 and it's gunner was Clarence Smoyer.

    • @floriangeyer3454
      @floriangeyer3454 2 роки тому +1

      @@kevinbabu8919 somewhere I found the name of the KIA wirh the leg torn off, but can`t remember where. The battle for Cologne is well dicumented

  • @pashapasovski5860
    @pashapasovski5860 2 роки тому +9

    Anti tank guns were used much more than Sherman tanks, against Tigers or any other German tank! There were maybe 3 tank on tank battles on the Western front!

    • @USSEnterprise6126
      @USSEnterprise6126 2 роки тому +1

      And when a tiger did run into a sherman it was always 5 because that is the size of an amarican tank platoon at the time and the smallest group of amarican tanks you would find so 5 Sherman's to destroy a tiger is false that is just tge number the us had in a platoon and that was the smallest group you would find unless a platoon was damaged

  • @ConvairDart106
    @ConvairDart106 2 роки тому +1

    If you would remove all the replays, you have 18 minutes of content. Until I develop dementia, I don't need a channel that repeats itself over and over.

  • @jasonrobinson2811
    @jasonrobinson2811 Рік тому +1

    I think they need to do more videos with anti-tank gunners I enjoyed this video a lot

  • @viktorgor8200
    @viktorgor8200 Рік тому +3

    If you compare total Gernan and Allied material losses during WW2 you will understand who was the best warrior.

  • @jasondrew5768
    @jasondrew5768 2 роки тому +5

    1st! Great historical tank video!

  • @MikeG42
    @MikeG42 Рік тому

    Good video yes !

  • @TheDukeOfDallas
    @TheDukeOfDallas 2 роки тому +2

    I'd hate to find myself in the gun sights of a Tiger and it's crew. Tiger crews were the elite and very well trained and battle hardened, add the superior armor and massive 88mm cannon on it that if they can see you they can easily reach out and touch you. Those Sherman crews were brave going up against them knowing full well they'd need at least 2-3 tanks to maneuver around the one Tiger to draw its fire and attention so the other Sherman crews can at least disable its tracks.

    • @chadjustice8560
      @chadjustice8560 2 роки тому +2

      Where do you get your info? Fury? Tiger crews at the beginning of the war maybe we're well trained but as the war went on those crews were killed off and even half through it was know allied tankers we're the better tankers. They did not need to maneuver anything plenty of Shermans killed tigers without doing anything like that. Even Whitman was killed by a 75mn Sherman. Think you need to actually research something for yourself

  • @EdmundLoh
    @EdmundLoh 2 роки тому +5

    5:07 gotta love that he wears his Knight's Cross with pride.

    • @theodorebennett7938
      @theodorebennett7938 Рік тому

      Why the heck wouldn't he? I sure would. The KC gave one instant credibility as it was worn on even combat uniforms and was readily recognizable and looked badass.

    • @daviddalton9214
      @daviddalton9214 Рік тому

      Plus a white hood.

  • @thecooky4944
    @thecooky4944 2 роки тому +30

    I had friends in that battle Woody and his men were sent to to the yard then after seeing much heavy fighting it was supposed to be an easy post it was definitely unexpected, another friend was in a bazooka squad he received a commendation thank God they both made it home too many men didn't

    • @4Kandlez
      @4Kandlez Рік тому +2

      How old are you? This was 77 years ago, if you and your friends were 20 years old at the time that would make you 97

    • @entertainme7523
      @entertainme7523 Рік тому +1

      we don't believe you

    • @ronalddunne3413
      @ronalddunne3413 Рік тому +1

      @@entertainme7523 "We" don't care if you believe it or not.

    • @ronalddunne3413
      @ronalddunne3413 Рік тому +1

      @@4Kandlez Consider the possibility that his friends and acquaintances who fought in that war were years older than he... I got to know quite a few guys older than myself- German and American, who fought in the war and lived to tell their stories. Just sayin.

    • @mohammedisaa9952
      @mohammedisaa9952 Рік тому +1

      @the cooky
      Yes yes.... i remember saying to the keiser, who was called atilla the hun, that one day he would be replace by an austrian corporal, and i knew this because i knew the astrologist i was going to get adolf to use....
      I will just keep writing some more guff to get attention and get ready for the questions people will ask me as they are asking you, what we must say is that we knew jules vern who lent us his time machine, and thats how i met king henry the 8th, actually braught him back and introduced him to churchill, who thaught they both wore the same sized clothes........... winston asked henry if he knew his tailor....
      Do you think "cooky" that people will believe me like you think people believe you.....?
      Do you need medication, as your 90 and im 147 or just over i think?.....
      Damm i keep forgetting the time machine story.... cooky.... come and help an old mate out b4 the masses start geering me, and it will be the villages with their burning sticks again as i try to run into the windmill again............. help me master..... cooky victor, mary shellies girlfriend..... the meds are failing................ the fire, the fire. 🔥

  • @DaveB
    @DaveB Рік тому

    I'm subscribed to History Hit - how come I can't find this on there? I was sort of expecting to watch everything that's "part or History Hit" without ads

  • @anthroimperzia3927
    @anthroimperzia3927 Рік тому +1

    People don't understand how painful it was to keep a Tiger, let alone a group of them in working order. It wasn't worth it

  • @arthurgeorge5474
    @arthurgeorge5474 2 роки тому +3

    What can counter both naval and ground?
    Air support.

  • @gusgone4527
    @gusgone4527 2 роки тому +47

    A tactical masterstroke identifying the enemies weak spot. Building up a force in secret and launching an attack with full element of surprise advantage. Brave and bold. However, it was a strategic disaster.

    • @herrcobblermachen
      @herrcobblermachen 2 роки тому +1

      Dunno about masterstroke- ambitious and well planned though. Ultimately it bled new resources away from real trouble spots and i doubt had it reached it's objective that it would have bought a few more months at best; and that i suppose highlights the dire situation so late in the war.

    • @Snookynibbles
      @Snookynibbles 2 роки тому

      It was & remains standard battlefield tactics to capitalize on targeting the flanks & rear of the enemy’s armor. And aircraft target and antitank guided munitions often target the thinly armored top of the turret.

    • @MauriatOttolink
      @MauriatOttolink 2 роки тому

      Gus Gone
      Would love to know how it was a strategic it was.
      I paused viewing and maybe the answer is further into the video?

    • @gusgone4527
      @gusgone4527 2 роки тому

      @@MauriatOttolink I think you are asking why it was a strategic disaster. Answer It rocked the advance of the allies in the west temporarily but as others have said. It used up strategic resources that could have been better used in other ways. Bolstering an organised retreat, buying time for Me262 production and other weapons systems so easily overlooked due to the end of the war. Eventually forcing a peace treaty and preserving Germany.

    • @MauriatOttolink
      @MauriatOttolink 2 роки тому +1

      @@gusgone4527
      Ah... Thanks for the rapid reply, Gus.
      I wasn't really asking WHY it was a strategic disaster, more WHAT the disaster was but you have answered it fully.
      I must admit that I thought that you were referring to a strategic mistake by the Allies.
      Incredible video!
      Many thanks.

  • @slaggerthord31
    @slaggerthord31 2 роки тому +2

    The audio is a bit off, I often can't hear a thing with all the explosions and music

  • @dianearon1258
    @dianearon1258 2 роки тому +1

    I wish the background music was louder , I can still hear the people talking

  • @raywhitehead730
    @raywhitehead730 2 роки тому +24

    Even if the Germans had gotten all the way to Antwerp, they would have been surrounded by hundreds of thousands of Allied troops, and with absolutely no reserves... It was doomed to failure.

    • @moss8448
      @moss8448 2 роки тому +3

      that's what Patton wanted was let 'em go then cut 'em off at the base and trap 'em all.

    • @muhammadsani129
      @muhammadsani129 2 роки тому

      I disagree they would have cut off the allies fuel supply

    • @raywhitehead730
      @raywhitehead730 2 роки тому +2

      @@muhammadsani129 most fuel was coming up from france, at least for the American s, that trucking effort was called the Red Ball express

    • @muhammadsani129
      @muhammadsani129 2 роки тому

      @@raywhitehead730 Yes but Antwerp was a strategically important place and even if the Germans didn't win the war capturing it would have adversely affected the allies and obviously prolonged the war.

    • @raywhitehead730
      @raywhitehead730 2 роки тому +1

      @@muhammadsani129 a bump in the road.

  • @ronaldregan1941
    @ronaldregan1941 2 роки тому +7

    German efficiency was far more than average. I don’t know why narrator doesn’t mention proportion and losses .Americans lost more people 90000 than Germans 65000

    • @redaug4212
      @redaug4212 2 роки тому

      Are you talking about losses in the Ardennes? 65000 is the low estimate for German losses. Realistically their casualties were closer to 100,000. The 12th SS division alone lost 9,800 men.

  • @haroldmclean3755
    @haroldmclean3755 Рік тому +1

    Very interesting 👍 R. I. P

  • @nunceccemortiferiscultu7826
    @nunceccemortiferiscultu7826 2 роки тому

    Imagine how good those CGI re-enactments could be if they had a budget like fury.
    I wish they'd spend just a shred of what they spend on movies about superheros, on re-creating these old battles, historal accuracy being a point of focus.