***** no..-_- aren't there homeless shelters in the UK? there are buildings that take care and accommodate the homeless, and that money spend on this should go there, i believe it would make a difference.
***** i guess you are right. :( maybe the city should gather the homeless, and get the social workers to help them with employment. plus you are right vilifying business owners isnt really fair to them. as well. but i feel there could be a better solution.
Mister mood Here is a better solution in general... PAY YOUR WORKERS. It is great for the economy, is a long term solution, and makes for faaaar fewer homeless. It will not eliminate 100% of them but it will get rid of a lot of them. Paying your workforce 1980's wages for work in 2015 is a good way to ultimately send your entire nation's economy into a death spiral.
@@piperbarlow1672 they should get a job and work like you an I, or they can find a place that isn't owned by someone else and sleep there. "My" building and you can't sleep on it, sorry Name a single homeless area that isn't littered with trash...go ahead, ill wait...
to the people that did this why don't you have a mattress and all that in front of your house and invite the homeless to sleep there? if the stores decides not to have homeless people sitting in front of their store it's their right to do so
@@scratch3406 a yes because it is super easy to get work when you have no home and thus have less access to thing like hygiene ,presentable clothes and the like
@@scratch3406 are you stupid? Telling a homeless person to gets job? Do you know how hard it is to do without and address Internet access ? U are stupid
All I see are paydays littered around businesses It just takes one person to trip and fall into those spikes . And then they could basically own that business. All these ignorant business owners just invited lawsuits to happen
I've attended homeless dinners where they are picked up on a large van, brought to a church and fed,asked if they'd like to shower, given free change of undergarments and clothes..you'd be amazed at how many want to live in a tent on the street. They wouldn't have it any other way..it's like a perm camping trip to a place they want to live(an expensive area)..there are some that would be intersted in working and having an apt, but many want to live where they are because of crazy reasons..by the way..most are crazy and if had a winning lotto ticket would give it away
It's not anyone's responsibility. If you suggest the homeless be treated as dependent beings, this must also mean that you believe homeless should be stripped of their right to be called adults
@@homelessinpeckham1094 That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever read. Giving them short-term assistance would be huge in putting them on the long-term path to self-sustainment.
@@elliefuller3667 Quite the opposite actually. The homeless don't need more than what they are currently given end of. You're both blind by your emotions and wrong in your idea of what people should be entitled to
To those advocating the removal of these spikes and patting yourselves on the backs because you're such great lovers of the unfortunate who have no homes, why don't you instead pour your energy into helping them to get homes. Or do you get some sort of pathological thrill out of walking by them every day and giving them one or two dollars out of your wallet or purse? Homelessness is not a right, or an alternative lifestyle, it is a sick reminder that a great and wealthy nation turns its back on those who are so mentally ill, so weak, that they are unable to pull themselves out of this maelstrom. No sane person chooses to be homeless. Think about that the next time you're whining about the spikes. Instead, form a coalition to build housing, tiny homes, maybe for them. Or join one already in existence in your city
I'm not a libertarian nut job but it seems to me that you're well within your rights to do whatever you want to your own property as long as it's not reaching out into the world and harming people (pollution, automated gun turrets, whatever). Putting foam pads over these spikes also seems like a grossly misplaced effort. First off it seems classist within itself, the message being "here you go street people, a little something from us at the top." Second I would think dollar for dollar and hour for hour any effort put into that gag would be better spent just paying for a person's rent till they get on their feet. Salt Lake City stands as the best model of solving homelessness so far. You just gotta give someone an apartment so they can get back on their feet. It's as uncapitalistic a solution as it gets but it works better than anything else and is surprisingly economical.
Penn Tarleton I'm a security guard. We have similar spikes on the property we guard ( an office building and shopping center) for the same reason. Every now and then, some idiots like these come and cover up the spikes with mattresses and a bookcase, but we just pick up the stuff and toss it in the trash compactor
It’s not about that right now. People don’t have to agree on every subject to work together. A coworker at a previous job of mine was adamantly against abortion, but she was an enthusiastic supporter of universal healthcare. I disagreed with her on abortion, but we both agreed on universal healthcare. You know how we would get through that in the instance we talked politics? We would both avoid discussing abortion, because we knew neither of us were changing our minds. You can go one issue at a time. Talk about stuff you agree on, before going to that you disagree on.
without compassion for misery or suffering; cruel. "confining wild horses is inhumane" Deterring people from sleeping in/on places not owned by them is not inhumane...
@@muddyguns earth is for everyone not just humans either. property is nobody's. no other animal on the planet wants money except for humanity. if someone doesn't have a home where are they supposed to sleep and feel safe?
@@georgieippolito9924 tell this to the many rabbits, racoons, squirrels, bugs, etc. that you, your home, your car have killed and disrupted. You place the value of their lives below yours. We're all "inhumane" you just feel you have a justification
Haahaa... If they put those in America then someone would "Slip and Fall" on them and there would be a BIG lawsuit and the companies would just keep getting sued for all they were worth.
The worst part of all this is people sleeping on your business is bad for business and the solution is spikes which cost money to install but then someone comes along and puts some bed that they cover the spikes with that also costs money and it will be thrown away by the business when they pay the employee to throw it out and meanwhile there's still a person who hasn't figured out how to not sleep in the streets.
there's still going to be homeless people around whether they donate their earnings or not, and there will be homeless people that are in front of the businesses, either robbing people at knife point, or deterring potential customers
Spending money to make other people‘s lives harder is stupid just so we don’t have to be inconvenienced by their presence do you know how stuck up and selfish that is
We do this over here too. It works miracles. No more shit around important buildings etc. The only difference is, that we do this to birds. The homeless we give homes.
Little Foot True but it may be just because they are an English speaking continent will places that have good access to internet. Murphy's Law in action. They can talk shit, so they do,
Why don't these thoughtful activist do the right thing and take a homeless person into their home? Because they stink, have addictions, disease and psychological problems...The same reason these businesses don't want them loitering and scaring off customers. So these "activist" are no better than the vendors that want them gone from their store fronts and establishments. If you want to do something good for the homeless, get them into shelters or start one of your own.
While these spikes obviously showcase a profound lack of empathy in the people who implement it, is the danger factor not considered? Imagine someone falling face first onto one of those spikes...
“The disposition to admire, and almost to worship, the rich and the powerful, and to despise, or, at least, to neglect persons of poor and mean condition is the great and most universal cause of the corruption of our moral sentiments.” ~Adam Smith, Scottish political economist (1723-1790)
If we want have people stop living on our streets, we should help to get them a place. It seems that all of the rich treat the poor like "peasants" why can't we *all* be Americans
WHAT MAKES THESE DO-GOODERS THINK THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO DO THIS? They don't! And homeless bums have no right to sit, lie, sleep, drink, or dhoot up on someone else's property! This hostile architecture is meant to ward them off, and rightfully do. Their presence is bad for business. Homeless people drink, they panhsndle, get drunk or high there, they leave their needles and excrement on the ground, and they loiter. Thus, they repel paying customers. In short, they are bad for business! I wouldn't want them hanging in front of my business or home. Would you want them in front of yours? I didn't think so. In Denver, CO., the city has installed similar spikes. Covering up such spikes to attract homeless people is an arrestable offence, and carries a fine of $500, plus clean-up and disposal fees.
I wonder how many people in the comments would actually help the homeless if one was sleeping in the doorway of their very own business which they had put blood, sweat and tears into making successful while armed with cups and tins actively asking customers for their money? There's sleeping rough and then there's begging, which is illegal.
@@anomonyous Stop jumping to conclusions like an entitled child and listen. Many businesses already partake in philanthropic endeavours through the proper channels. If folks want to help, it is up to THEM, NOT the homeless.
I like what they're doing but I wonder if it's legal. Does the potential seating area belong to the company who's window it's next to you or does it belong to the government / the city? I'm asking because wouldn't covering the spikes go against property rights for the company? If it belongs to the city then you could argue that you don't want your tax dollars being spent that way and that if you pay for the spikes in tax dollars then you can choose to cover them up. I love what they're doing but can it get them into legal trouble?
There's a limit to freedom of speech (which is that you cannot incite terrorism or racial/religious hatred), so why shouldn't there be a limit to property rights?
softrockification Activists can't go to other people's private property and install beds on them for the homeless. If the activists want, they can invite those homeless people into their homes. That said, the government shouldn't allow homelessness to this extreme. They should provide safe and dignified sleeping spaces for those on hard times.
That shit it awesome. I wish people realized majority of people who are homeless are because their job doesn't pay a living wage. The average homeless person in America is 11. Yet people still waste and treat them like criminals. But praise our politicians who caused this. ????
Wow I didn't know that companies would be so heartless and deterred homeless people by using the same techniques as they use for pigeons (essentially the rats of the bird family) This is truly astonishing!
ParadoxlnABox No. The governments and the rich are the rats of society, influencing global warming. What if a homeless person was homeless because they were BORN into a poor family? Now that just wouldn't be fair, would it?
Spikes seem rather cruel to people who already have nothing, nice to know that the activists care more for taking pictures than helping the people who are affected
without compassion for misery or suffering; cruel. "confining wild horses is inhumane" Deterring people from sleeping in/on a place that isn't owned by them is not inhumane
@@DopeThug You confuse the word "bum" and "human". Bums forfeit their humanity when they deliberately become bums, put drugs up their butts publicly, attack citizens, and spread their feces and diseases everywhere.
The rest of England helps their homeless,but progressive London spikes the sleep areas.
if only the money used to put those spikes in place went to actually helping the fucking homeless.-_-
***** i am sure it would make a difference,:) maybe give to a homeless shelter or something.
***** no..-_- aren't there homeless shelters in the UK? there are buildings that take care and accommodate the homeless, and that money spend on this should go there, i believe it would make a difference.
***** i guess you are right. :(
maybe the city should gather the homeless, and get the social workers to help them with employment.
plus you are right vilifying business owners isnt really fair to them. as well. but i feel there could be a better solution.
Mister mood Here is a better solution in general... PAY YOUR WORKERS. It is great for the economy, is a long term solution, and makes for faaaar fewer homeless. It will not eliminate 100% of them but it will get rid of a lot of them. Paying your workforce 1980's wages for work in 2015 is a good way to ultimately send your entire nation's economy into a death spiral.
Mister mood the m.o. of capitalism in a nutshell
I want to see this artists put this mattress for homeless person under his own doorway, I want to see this happen!
Me too
It won't
where do you want them to go? do you just want them to disappear
@@piperbarlow1672 they should get a job and work like you an I, or they can find a place that isn't owned by someone else and sleep there. "My" building and you can't sleep on it, sorry
Name a single homeless area that isn't littered with trash...go ahead, ill wait...
@@muddyguns I'm retired at 40 due to severe arthritis and would like more places to sit, you privileged CHILD.
lol, its like what they do to do pigeons with those spikes on the roof.
So they won't poop on you or dirty the building.
to the people that did this
why don't you have a mattress and all that in front of your house and invite the homeless to sleep there?
if the stores decides not to have homeless people sitting in front of their store it's their right to do so
stores are a public space. Where do you want them to go? they cant just dissapear.
Goat Bab “where do you want them to go?”... how about go to work
@@scratch3406 a yes because it is super easy to get work when you have no home and thus have less access to thing like hygiene ,presentable clothes and the like
@@scratch3406 are you stupid? Telling a homeless person to gets job? Do you know how hard it is to do without and address Internet access ? U are stupid
@@scratch3406they would have more success getting a job if they had a bed to sleep on.
Some shops had them in Montreal, but they got removed. Being perceived as an inhuman bastard can be bad for business.
All I see are paydays littered around businesses It just takes one person to trip and fall into those spikes . And then they could basically own that business. All these ignorant business owners just invited lawsuits to happen
try housing them it works
If I had a business. I wouldn’t want homeless people loitering g about. Why is that wrong.
Why they're actually spending money to NOT help homeless people
Help get the homeless into permanent housing, not continue making it easier for them to be homeless.
Great way to put attention on a growing problem.
imagine if they spent their money and time.helping the homeless get off the street
I've attended homeless dinners where they are picked up on a large van, brought to a church and fed,asked if they'd like to shower, given free change of undergarments and clothes..you'd be amazed at how many want to live in a tent on the street. They wouldn't have it any other way..it's like a perm camping trip to a place they want to live(an expensive area)..there are some that would be intersted in working and having an apt, but many want to live where they are because of crazy reasons..by the way..most are crazy and if had a winning lotto ticket would give it away
It's not anyone's responsibility. If you suggest the homeless be treated as dependent beings, this must also mean that you believe homeless should be stripped of their right to be called adults
@@homelessinpeckham1094 That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever read. Giving them short-term assistance would be huge in putting them on the long-term path to self-sustainment.
@@elliefuller3667 Quite the opposite actually. The homeless don't need more than what they are currently given end of. You're both blind by your emotions and wrong in your idea of what people should be entitled to
@@homelessinpeckham1094 Short term assistance works. It’s what got me off the streets.
What the councils are doing is making people who are already in a bad situations worse. Instead of helping these people find shelter.
To those advocating the removal of these spikes and patting yourselves on the backs because you're such great lovers of the unfortunate who have no homes, why don't you instead pour your energy into helping them to get homes.
Or do you get some sort of pathological thrill out of walking by them every day and giving them one or two dollars out of your wallet or purse?
Homelessness is not a right, or an alternative lifestyle, it is a sick reminder that a great and wealthy nation turns its back on those who are so mentally ill, so weak, that they are unable to pull themselves out of this maelstrom.
No sane person chooses to be homeless. Think about that the next time you're whining about the spikes. Instead, form a coalition to build housing, tiny homes, maybe for them. Or join one already in existence in your city
They most likely do devote their energy to helping them get off the streets. Only in your own mind is it a one or the other choice it seems.
This is what happens under Tory rule...
I'm not a libertarian nut job but it seems to me that you're well within your rights to do whatever you want to your own property as long as it's not reaching out into the world and harming people (pollution, automated gun turrets, whatever).
Putting foam pads over these spikes also seems like a grossly misplaced effort. First off it seems classist within itself, the message being "here you go street people, a little something from us at the top." Second I would think dollar for dollar and hour for hour any effort put into that gag would be better spent just paying for a person's rent till they get on their feet.
Salt Lake City stands as the best model of solving homelessness so far. You just gotta give someone an apartment so they can get back on their feet. It's as uncapitalistic a solution as it gets but it works better than anything else and is surprisingly economical.
Penn Tarleton dude, spikes are a way to harm people
Penn Tarleton
I'm a security guard. We have similar spikes on the property we guard ( an office building and shopping center) for the same reason.
Every now and then, some idiots like these come and cover up the spikes with mattresses and a bookcase, but we just pick up the stuff and toss it in the trash compactor
Oh boo hoo. A business doesn’t want homeless rodents stinking up the place and keeping paying customers away. I don’t blame them
@@timluns the sidewalk is public domain. The building itself is not.
Great idea, but man the guy wearing the "ACAB" shirt really put me off.
It’s not about that right now. People don’t have to agree on every subject to work together. A coworker at a previous job of mine was adamantly against abortion, but she was an enthusiastic supporter of universal healthcare. I disagreed with her on abortion, but we both agreed on universal healthcare. You know how we would get through that in the instance we talked politics? We would both avoid discussing abortion, because we knew neither of us were changing our minds. You can go one issue at a time. Talk about stuff you agree on, before going to that you disagree on.
spikes are boring. use tasers and put it on Web cam...now that's entertainment!
Well said Michael, well said!!
I Know Its Bad But I Wouldn't Want Homeless People Sleeping In Front Of My Business
I should start giving homeless people plywood sheets to lay anywhere even on top of spikes. this is inhumane!
without compassion for misery or suffering; cruel.
"confining wild horses is inhumane"
Deterring people from sleeping in/on places not owned by them is not inhumane...
And you are going to pay for all that expensive plywood?
@@muddyguns earth is for everyone not just humans either. property is nobody's. no other animal on the planet wants money except for humanity. if someone doesn't have a home where are they supposed to sleep and feel safe?
@@georgieippolito9924 tell this to the many rabbits, racoons, squirrels, bugs, etc. that you, your home, your car have killed and disrupted. You place the value of their lives below yours. We're all "inhumane" you just feel you have a justification
@@georgieippolito9924 In the middle of the street
Haahaa... If they put those in America then someone would "Slip and Fall" on them and there would be a BIG lawsuit and the companies would just keep getting sued for all they were worth.
The worst part of all this is people sleeping on your business is bad for business and the solution is spikes which cost money to install but then someone comes along and puts some bed that they cover the spikes with that also costs money and it will be thrown away by the business when they pay the employee to throw it out and meanwhile there's still a person who hasn't figured out how to not sleep in the streets.
It's better not pander to the homeless by excusing bad behaviour
there's still going to be homeless people around whether they donate their earnings or not, and there will be homeless people that are in front of the businesses, either robbing people at knife point, or deterring potential customers
Ignorant
Why don't those activists take those homeless people to their homes? sleeping on their yard is way better.
Exactly, then they will see why and put spikes in their yards.
Spending money to make other people‘s lives harder is stupid just so we don’t have to be inconvenienced by their presence do you know how stuck up and selfish that is
We do this over here too. It works miracles. No more shit around important buildings etc.
The only difference is, that we do this to birds. The homeless we give homes.
The money spent on manufacturing those spikes could of been used to give homeless people jobs
True, but they'll rather burn those money than help them.
If this was in the U.S the Europeans would be talking mad shit
Every nation has citizens likes to talk shit about other countries.
John Doe europena do it way more than anyone, youtube is full of proof
Little Foot True but it may be just because they are an English speaking continent will places that have good access to internet. Murphy's Law in action. They can talk shit, so they do,
If this happened in the U.S. You would be shooting them
Xavier Jones Shut up. You know little of what you speak of.
Why don't these thoughtful activist do the right thing and take a homeless person into their home? Because they stink, have addictions, disease and psychological problems...The same reason these businesses don't want them loitering and scaring off customers. So these "activist" are no better than the vendors that want them gone from their store fronts and establishments. If you want to do something good for the homeless, get them into shelters or start one of your own.
While these spikes obviously showcase a profound lack of empathy in the people who implement it, is the danger factor not considered? Imagine someone falling face first onto one of those spikes...
Homeless shaolin monks will have no problems with those spikes
“The disposition to admire, and almost to worship, the rich and the powerful, and to despise, or, at least, to neglect persons of poor and mean condition is the great and most universal cause of the corruption of our moral sentiments.”
~Adam Smith, Scottish political economist (1723-1790)
Get rational and get off Reagan/Murdoch/Propaganda.
I support these activists.
They do this shit in America too imagine paying so much money to keep away homeless people instead of giving them jobs
Have to want to have a job first
Most homeless don't want jobs. They are lazy.
They’re anti skate, I don’t think they’re anti homeless as much as designed to stop people from grinding
That's dumb as shit why build spike to keep them away when you can give them money to help them so that they don't have to start there.
Really irrelevant but what's the name of the music they use for the video
What's the name of the background music?
Cornelius Blue Did you find out? Im wondering too:)
Flow H Couldn't really find the instrumentals. I even downloaded that Shazam app, still no results. Maybe you can try!
this should be illegal
Love the spikes.
It's a lifestyle not a choice.
Huh?
How about spending money on helping the homeless rather than investing in something that prevents them from having a place to rest?
If we want have people stop living on our streets, we should help to get them a place. It seems that all of the rich treat the poor like "peasants" why can't we *all* be Americans
Because this is on London
WHAT MAKES THESE DO-GOODERS THINK THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO DO THIS? They don't! And homeless bums have no right to sit, lie, sleep, drink, or dhoot up on someone else's property!
This hostile architecture is meant to ward them off, and rightfully do. Their presence is bad for business. Homeless people drink, they panhsndle, get drunk or high there, they leave their needles and excrement on the ground, and they loiter. Thus, they repel paying customers. In short, they are bad for business!
I wouldn't want them hanging in front of my business or home. Would you want them in front of yours? I didn't think so.
In Denver, CO., the city has installed similar spikes. Covering up such spikes to attract homeless people is an arrestable offence, and carries a fine of $500, plus clean-up and disposal fees.
This kind of architecture makes me sick. Instead of wasting money on spikes, actually buy the people some f*cking houses
I wonder how many people in the comments would actually help the homeless if one was sleeping in the doorway of their very own business which they had put blood, sweat and tears into making successful while armed with cups and tins actively asking customers for their money? There's sleeping rough and then there's begging, which is illegal.
@@anomonyous Stop jumping to conclusions like an entitled child and listen. Many businesses already partake in philanthropic endeavours through the proper channels.
If folks want to help, it is up to THEM, NOT the homeless.
🤓🤓🤓🤓
Who to blame it is the conservative party, the prime minister, corporation, the rich?
Cold world
Or, consider this, put that money into building a shelter for the homeless instaed of defacing a business.
I totally agree businesses should be helping more homeless people instead of putting a literal death trap in front of their business
Or, towards a cause that can prevent homelessness. Being homeless for an extended period of time is a choice.
Those four people at 0.55 look like an advert for homelessness . . . clean , well fed , nice clothes and shoes , a variety of drinks . . .
Chock full of heroine.
I like what they're doing but I wonder if it's legal. Does the potential seating area belong to the company who's window it's next to you or does it belong to the government / the city? I'm asking because wouldn't covering the spikes go against property rights for the company? If it belongs to the city then you could argue that you don't want your tax dollars being spent that way and that if you pay for the spikes in tax dollars then you can choose to cover them up. I love what they're doing but can it get them into legal trouble?
There's a limit to freedom of speech (which is that you cannot incite terrorism or racial/religious hatred), so why shouldn't there be a limit to property rights?
What if someone fell thare ahh
Just 2000 people. London can fix it.
Wow, this was condescending.
Good for those activists
Awesome video, drawing attention to whats been going on for too long
Now you can get impaled easily by falling over!
Why don't u just invite them to ur house an let them sleep there?
why won't you do that yourself?
@Daisyle 125 probably because like most people, he doesn’t want to invite rodents into his house.
ParadoxlnABox Atleast they’re not as big a “Rodent” as you 😂
That's a fire hazzard. It would be a shame if it catches on fire while a homeless person was laying on those nice, soft, beds.
it's actually sleeping rough not rough sleeping
I wonder how much the spikes, paying the people to install them and designers cost to create such a thing.
softrockification Activists can't go to other people's private property and install beds on them for the homeless. If the activists want, they can invite those homeless people into their homes.
That said, the government shouldn't allow homelessness to this extreme. They should provide safe and dignified sleeping spaces for those on hard times.
That shit it awesome. I wish people realized majority of people who are homeless are because their job doesn't pay a living wage. The average homeless person in America is 11. Yet people still waste and treat them like criminals. But praise our politicians who caused this. ????
Can hardly think in something more fucked up
Spikes, not mess.
I hope this doesn't happen in Canada, (correct me if I am wrong)
What is the background song that does not have Sandstorm in it?
I hope the spikes*****
Stuiped london
Wow I didn't know that companies would be so heartless and deterred homeless people by using the same techniques as they use for pigeons (essentially the rats of the bird family)
This is truly astonishing!
Hellenix Edm I've seen similar outside churches in the Southern US.
It’s quite fitting as the homeless are the rats of the human family.
ParadoxlnABox No. The governments and the rich are the rats of society, influencing global warming. What if a homeless person was homeless because they were BORN into a poor family? Now that just wouldn't be fair, would it?
@Hemin Mohamed or more likely, they’re lazy bums who don’t contribute to society. Like a leech, or a rat, if you will.
Spikes seem rather cruel to people who already have nothing, nice to know that the activists care more for taking pictures than helping the people who are affected
why not instead of spending money to keep away the homeless actually use it to help the homeless
🙌🏽
No it's for skaters to stop skating there
Hell.
Yeah.
I support this idea
This is laughable. Why would they do something as cruel and inhumane to them like that for?
without compassion for misery or suffering; cruel.
"confining wild horses is inhumane"
Deterring people from sleeping in/on a place that isn't owned by them is not inhumane
@@muddyguns they are homeless, and spikes are very dangerous
@@zrok193 so are the needles, feces, and trash they all leave behind. Dangerous.
Is that your property though ?
EXACTLY GREAT POINT!!!
I'm late.
Jay not really.:)
yes you are what a horrible person you are you should feel shame of your self..........
nah, just kidding XD
Hell yeah!!!!!! We need more spikes!!!!! Fight the bums!!!!!!!!!
:c
What's Wrong With You?
He's not Bum But Human Too , Its Like Treating An Animao
@@DopeThug What's wrong with you? How could you deny us cleansing and purification?
FIGHT. THE. BUMZ.
@@kanani717 bums Human Too But Not Have Home
@@DopeThug You confuse the word "bum" and "human". Bums forfeit their humanity when they deliberately become bums, put drugs up their butts publicly, attack citizens, and spread their feces and diseases everywhere.
I think it's a great idea.
I assume you mean the spikes? If so, I agree. No one wants homeless rodents on their doorstep.
ParadoxlnABox What if you were a homeless rodent?
If he was a homeless rodent then then I hope the spikes would work to keep him away😁
I'm early
Let’s drop the homeless off on the sidewalk of an activist’s home.