Hilary Putnam on Negative Theology (1997)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 вер 2024
  • Hilary Putnam discusses negative theology and some of its paradoxes, as well as the famous Jewish philosopher Maimonides. This lecture was given in 1997 at Calvin College.
    #philosophy #maimonides

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @jameslovell5721
    @jameslovell5721 15 днів тому +8

    Let’s be emphatically apophatic about philosophy

  • @massgeneral9873
    @massgeneral9873 14 днів тому +8

    There is no sound more sinister -- at least on our shared, terrestrial plane-- than the smug, knowing laughter of a pack of analytic philosophers. Truly chilling.

    • @garethjohn4347
      @garethjohn4347 11 днів тому

      Well not sure about sinister but it’s hard not to notice how amusing Hilary found the development of
      his arguments -particularly the recursive move. I believe we get the word ‘hilarious’ from him.

    • @longcastle4863
      @longcastle4863 8 днів тому +1

      I think this comment says more about you than philosophers

    • @erickhaynie3708
      @erickhaynie3708 6 днів тому +2

      “This is not praise”. A haunting, disrespectful comment.

  • @nathangrovhoug3903
    @nathangrovhoug3903 16 днів тому +8

    Putnam on the Ritz

  • @rodrigobenevides.bg23
    @rodrigobenevides.bg23 5 днів тому

    can someone recommend a book or paper by Putnam on religion/theology etc?

  • @AnthonyL0401
    @AnthonyL0401 13 днів тому

    Dude sounds like Jeff Goldblum if he were teaching a class

  • @jawadahmad4466
    @jawadahmad4466 16 днів тому

    Hey world

  • @michaelstueben2880
    @michaelstueben2880 16 днів тому +2

    I enjoyed this talk, but it was abstruse.

  • @henry6525
    @henry6525 15 днів тому +2

    God cannot be evaluated by any human propositions. God cannot be wise or not wise, merciful or cruel, etc., as we aren't able to clearly conceive the concept of god, as his nature remains abstract to us. We must admit that the human comprehension is extremely limited no matter how we try to develop it either through religion, philosophy or other means. Either you believe with no logical application or otherwise. But this "otherwise" is still rooted in belief.

    • @kiDchemical
      @kiDchemical 10 днів тому +2

      “God cannot be evaluated by any human propositions” is a human proposition evaluating God.

    • @henry6525
      @henry6525 10 днів тому +2

      @@kiDchemical Yep, a vicious circle. We are limited.

  • @erickhaynie3708
    @erickhaynie3708 10 днів тому

    I was looking forward to this video and turned it off party way through. The man was clearly partisan in his philosophy and seemed to direct hate toward other faith traditions.

  • @Doortodoorgeek
    @Doortodoorgeek 15 днів тому +3

    god is anything but good

  • @CesarClouds
    @CesarClouds 16 днів тому +2

    Theology, yuk.

    • @bankafouf
      @bankafouf 13 днів тому +1

      Yeah, it depends on ? ( Knowledge as in the most respected aspect must be especially when in it comes to ( religion) in a secureler mode with evidence to chut the bigots one for all... ? As I see and think

    • @genjiyoung5776
      @genjiyoung5776 12 днів тому

      grow up

    • @CesarClouds
      @CesarClouds 11 днів тому +2

      @bankafouf Once you indulge in it, you're mired in a priori logic chopping, that nonsense on stilts. Either that, or consulting with ancient text for the final word.