Mass Battle: The US Air Force vs The Chinese Air Force & Navy (WarGames 150) | DCS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 чер 2024
  • We answer the viewer question whether or not the US Air Force could take on the Chinese Air Force & Navy. Our sim can not handle 3600 aircraft similtaneously, so we run a 1/10th scale proportional battle with 360 aircraft.
    PATREON: / grimreapers
    Mods: • Free DCS Mods
    0:00 Overview
    1:00 Research
    4:44 Scenario Details
    12:01 Predictions
    13:00 Battle!
    USEFUL LINKS
    GRIM REAPERS (UA-cam): / @grimreapers
    GRIM REAPERS 2 (UA-cam): / @grimreapers2
    GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
    DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
    DCS BUYERS GUIDES: • DCS World Module Quick...
    DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
    MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
    PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
    PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
    SOCIAL MEDIA
    WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
    STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
    FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
    TWITTER: / grimreapers_
    DISCORD: / discord
    THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
    #WarGames #GRWarGames #China #USAF #Su57 #J20 #F22 #F35 #F15EX #F16C #DCSQuestioned #GR #DCSWorld #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military #DCS #DCSWorld
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 456

  • @grimreapers
    @grimreapers  10 місяців тому +1

    Chinese Air Force vs Russian Air Force: ua-cam.com/video/vHO94A7x6v8/v-deo.html
    US Air Force vs Chinese Air Force ua-cam.com/video/ngXvWALKi1w/v-deo.html
    US Air Force vs US Navy & Marine Corps: ua-cam.com/video/OfThwhYC-WQ/v-deo.html

    • @sarttee
      @sarttee 3 місяці тому

      so.. why did 4th gen fighters go in first and not the stealth fighters?

  • @carloschaves445
    @carloschaves445 11 місяців тому +239

    I certainly feel like a valued viewer

    • @moshmeary51
      @moshmeary51 11 місяців тому +13

      Viewerton*

    • @vapormissile
      @vapormissile 11 місяців тому +14

      ​@@moshmeary51I'm a value-added viewington from viewbieville. I graduated Viewgworts in Observinghampton.

    • @terpin86
      @terpin86 11 місяців тому +7

      What about a valued humanoid?

    • @vapormissile
      @vapormissile 11 місяців тому

      @@flashgordon6670 that might take a while. Everybody, get busy!

    • @vapormissile
      @vapormissile 11 місяців тому

      @@flashgordon6670 well, if it's the Universe you're looking to for payback, I'd watch that plan. The bitch cooks her books, plus she's an actual witch.

  • @Fl-Pride
    @Fl-Pride 11 місяців тому +15

    So funny how the trolls will complain about so many things. Instead of just enjoying all the hard work that goes into the videos.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  11 місяців тому +5

      Welcome to my life...

  • @Maverick0451
    @Maverick0451 11 місяців тому +20

    That was incredibly entertaining!!! My favorite moment was when Super Cap caught a J-20, an F-22, and an F-35 all-in one-shot dancing around in close quarters!! Brilliant stuff!! Hats off to Brandon, aka the Flying Dutchman for the excellent tactical flying staying low and popping up, especially early on before all the stealth American aircraft were on the scene!!

  • @hughmungus2760
    @hughmungus2760 11 місяців тому +28

    what I think was happening was not only did F16s not carry enough missiles, but they were wasting them all on humans who were 'soaking up the aggro' by being very evasive directly under them.

  • @kenhelmers2603
    @kenhelmers2603 11 місяців тому +19

    Fixing the F35 bug made a difference. Well done Cap, lots of work!

  • @fonzmeal6165
    @fonzmeal6165 11 місяців тому +5

    "hello valued viewers" has that soothing quality you'd find at the beginning of a "therapeutic mind journey" video. Best part of my day.

  • @MannsModelMoments
    @MannsModelMoments 11 місяців тому +17

    I'd like to see this fight again but with the reserve forces split proportionally through all the aircraft types so there would be stealth aircraft from the start on both sides as I think this would better represent the two sides availability of the airframes. Given that stealth made such an impact mid-game, I think this would probably change the overall dynamic

  • @jamieaulbach5120
    @jamieaulbach5120 11 місяців тому +9

    One thing that is not accurate is typical air to air for F16 is one AIM9X and the rest 120's. Same with 15.

  • @willthrill94
    @willthrill94 11 місяців тому +3

    @15:30 well if you’re on top of current status quo, game theory would have that person understate their capabilities to create confusion and uncertainty for runners-up. If you’re a challenger to the top position then it would behoove that group to overstate their capabilities to create worry for the top guy

  • @sampanyofella5832
    @sampanyofella5832 11 місяців тому +4

    You give such a thrilling commentary Cap. These videos are always one of the most looked-forward-to events of my week.

  • @hoyahimsa
    @hoyahimsa 8 місяців тому +1

    haha around 20:35 the j15 with no wings and the interjection "well if you go fast enough you don't need 'em"

  • @bushweasel
    @bushweasel 11 місяців тому +7

    This why we can't get enough of Cap and the Grim Reapers! Thank you for keeping us entertained.

  • @gail_blue
    @gail_blue 11 місяців тому +10

    Thanks for doing this! BTW I find Cap to be one of the friendliest voices on UA-cam.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  11 місяців тому +3

      awww

    • @dexlab7539
      @dexlab7539 11 місяців тому +1

      Cap is the best part imo!!! Love him

    • @gail_blue
      @gail_blue 10 місяців тому

      @@dexlab7539 Yep, they are all fun. And even if it causes me to pull my hair out, it's the best whenever something goes wrong.

  • @manjisaipoe517
    @manjisaipoe517 11 місяців тому +13

    Great fun Cap, no real issues today. Thank you to all the humans flying today, you make these so much more interesting. Peace.

  • @2o7o7dragon
    @2o7o7dragon 11 місяців тому +14

    Love watching the Raptors come in and have a good stomp! Was worried this was going to be a reupload of another fight I just saw yesterday, but then I saw the fuel tanks. Excellent fight guys!

  • @-Hardstyle-
    @-Hardstyle- 11 місяців тому +6

    This was bloody awesome 👏
    F-22's screaming in like maniacs! Gun kills! Beautiful humans being cheeky! Carnage!
    Absolutely loved it.

  • @hanrockabrand95
    @hanrockabrand95 11 місяців тому +16

    You might say the server was Super Bugged down. What kind of server setup would you need in order to run the kind of complex game you'd want to? And is that something you might crowdsource?

  • @ryabow
    @ryabow 11 місяців тому +2

    i love that you include the chinese naval aircraft, but none of the USMC or USN aircraft and yet we still have the numbers advantage

  • @SeedOfElijah
    @SeedOfElijah 10 місяців тому +1

    Nice catch up to even it up. That F-22 swooping in and smashing 3, like a movie.

  • @cygmoid
    @cygmoid 10 місяців тому +1

    That F22 gun run on the J20 was mad. Nice video Grim Reapers

  • @dat_sauce_tho2194
    @dat_sauce_tho2194 11 місяців тому +11

    That was a great fight, I would be interested in finding out why the f-16's weren't firing their amrams

  • @jokiejoker2011
    @jokiejoker2011 11 місяців тому +5

    Great commentary Cap. Very well done. A Wimbledon announcer couldn’t do better!

  • @alexislim5510
    @alexislim5510 11 місяців тому +3

    I dont understand why f16 and f15ex go first? It suppose to be the f22 and f32 so the can direct the missile of f16 and f15 to the target enemy.

  • @JamesWellsIndiana
    @JamesWellsIndiana 11 місяців тому +4

    Why hold the stealth fighters back? Seems like if you LED with the stealth fighters, we would have the advantage because the Chinese would have had no targets to shoot at?

  • @toddbrewer683
    @toddbrewer683 11 місяців тому +1

    Damn Cap, you were on FIRE with the commentary tonight! Thanks!!!

  • @Patrician9000
    @Patrician9000 11 місяців тому +7

    What kind of server would you need access in order to field 3600 aircraft? And why haven't we crowdfunded this?

    • @Snowwie88
      @Snowwie88 11 місяців тому

      I think DCS also is limited in how many CPU's it would utilize.

    • @92HazelMocha
      @92HazelMocha 11 місяців тому +2

      I've run missions with over 3600 ground vehicles and it only functions at 1/4 speed or slower, and ground units use an order of magnitude less cpu to run.

  • @strambino1
    @strambino1 11 місяців тому +5

    Just for fun, I would like to see how the combined US Navy and Marine Corps air forces would do against the Chinese combined tactical Air Force.

    • @Aiede71
      @Aiede71 11 місяців тому

      Yeah, if the PLA is getting their 60 PLAN fighters then the US should get 600+ USN & USMC Super Hornets & F-35s.

  • @ecbst6
    @ecbst6 11 місяців тому +3

    That map looks like the strings on a serial killer investigation.
    Cool!

  • @brandoncollins7053
    @brandoncollins7053 11 місяців тому +4

    The commentary on this video is hilarious

  • @mrjankee25
    @mrjankee25 11 місяців тому +2

    That was fun the f22 hero gun kill was awsome 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

  • @patricktho6546
    @patricktho6546 11 місяців тому +2

    The F22's being super aggressive (prob just because of their faster speed) kinda very well fits the meme

  • @LukeBunyip
    @LukeBunyip 11 місяців тому

    Thanks Cap et al. You all seem to be having a ball. Look forward to the next one

  • @weaponizedace3231
    @weaponizedace3231 11 місяців тому +7

    why did you delete the original?

  • @thefatefulforce8887
    @thefatefulforce8887 11 місяців тому

    Epic! Good job once again GR team!

  • @Zalthook5048
    @Zalthook5048 11 місяців тому +8

    So why are the F-22s and J-20s not going ahead 1st?

    • @benhertz9826
      @benhertz9826 11 місяців тому +1

      yea, makes no sense sending in after the 4th gens

    • @ncjoker420
      @ncjoker420 11 місяців тому +1

      I am sure this way made a much better video. The Raptors would punch a hole through, the 35s would be circling spawn, and by the time the 40% of 15/16s spawned, they would need to carry bombs.

    • @GageEakins
      @GageEakins 11 місяців тому +2

      @@ncjoker420 Your comment made me laugh very hard. Yeah that would probably be the outcome.

  • @the3rdlung
    @the3rdlung 11 місяців тому +2

    I have seriously learned so much from watching these videos

  • @trustbutverify485
    @trustbutverify485 10 місяців тому +1

    In any fight like this, you should spawn in stealth first. They would get in, destroy aircraft at a high rate and reduce missile platforms. Thus the enemy can fire a lot fewer missiles at 4th Gen follow ons. This has a disproportionate effect on the outcome, as it should.

  • @Kevin-hb7yq
    @Kevin-hb7yq 11 місяців тому +1

    Amazing battle folks! Super cool!!

  • @gooseman_x
    @gooseman_x 11 місяців тому +20

    Cap, are you seriously surprised that they’re so aggressive, even though they carry the name “Raptor”?😂

  • @iamno1864
    @iamno1864 11 місяців тому +2

    That was great..love the commentary

  • @piconano
    @piconano 11 місяців тому +6

    That was an exciting war game.

  • @bendalton5221
    @bendalton5221 11 місяців тому +7

    yeah the main unrealistic thing about this is it acts like a video game: units spawning and going in one at a time. I don't know about the Chinese, but the Americans would send planes in as flights, form up and then send a large group in all at once, and then they would volley fire: it's a lot harder for the enemy to avoid a massive fight of incoming missiles at the same time (think 48 jets firing two missiles each at the same time)

    • @lagrangewei
      @lagrangewei 11 місяців тому

      if you weren't attack sure, but in a real war when your airfield is getting bomb would it really be wise?

    • @jamison884
      @jamison884 11 місяців тому +4

      @@lagrangewei No one is sneaking up on a US air base and getting bombed without warning. But the poster is correct, the US, NATO, and pretty much every AF in the world (I believe) operates on the basis of multiples of either 2 or 4 jets. It's always an even number unless there's a last minutes reason (or in the case of actual combat...losses) that force an odd number of jets in a flight.
      Basically, DCS just isn't programmed to use the real-world advantages the US has. The most stealthy jets, top-quality electronic warfare, amazing training quality, more flight hours than virtually every other country, more hours on realistic simulators, top-quality sesnors/datalink/satellite/radar using the F-35 as a flying computer/router. Not all forces are created equal, except in DCS.

    • @bendalton5221
      @bendalton5221 11 місяців тому +4

      @@jamison884 yep, and it doesn't't take into account tactics and doctrines. We would send in small groups of stealth planes first, knock out their airborne warning, then a large flight of planes firing multiple types of missiles from various ranges to mess up their formations, then a sneak attack flight of stealth aircraft right after that as the enemy reformed, then a last flight to achieve air superiority. With that last flight would come flights of HARM equipped planes and fighter bombers to go after air defenses and airfields, to get anything left on the ground, knock out there defenses and ability to respond. After that, focus would be on maintaining air superiority. No one does that better than us, thought the command and control aircraft we keep up. One of the sneakiest tactics we use is to volley off a flight of medium/long range missiles on passive mode. CC can vector the missiles in, enemy gets nothing on their warning sets. Last minute, they put the missile flight into active mode: the Chinese headsets would go ballistic with missile warning/missle lock, and the missiles would be at point blank range at this point (I serve AF '92-'98, saw things like this in action, pretty impressive)

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 11 місяців тому +1

      in the real world they would have target discrimination as well instead of firing 10 missiles at the same dead guy.

    • @sweatybotfn9982
      @sweatybotfn9982 11 місяців тому

      China would do the same. But with tactics. They have stealth aircraft but not as much as US so they wouldn’t go head to head with all of their aircrafts

  • @Anarchy_420
    @Anarchy_420 11 місяців тому +3

    15:21 100% Cap!👍👍
    Btw i haven't watched yet and already happy with the changes you've made compared to The GR 2 channel Vid ;)

  • @weaponizedace3231
    @weaponizedace3231 11 місяців тому +4

    also the J-20s can carry 4 external fuel tanks, if ur gonna give the f-35 and f22 tanks, give the j20 its fuel tanks

    • @rodneypayne4827
      @rodneypayne4827 11 місяців тому +2

      Maybe they are not modelled. It is a mod aircraft after all.

    • @DogmaFaucet
      @DogmaFaucet 11 місяців тому +2

      In the previous run, the F-35s AIs all RTB'd before engaging. I think the tanks were added just to make the scenario work. I don't remember a similar problem with the J-20.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 11 місяців тому +2

      I dont think J20s running out of fuel was the problem. they carried too few missiles. Although in coming years its likely J20s will get an upgrade to increase their capacity to 8

    • @weaponizedace3231
      @weaponizedace3231 11 місяців тому +1

      @@hughmungus2760 hmm yea j20s dont carry alot, i think the f35 only carried 4 but they updated it to carry 6 (i forgot if it was the f35 or f22)

    • @chg-vq6kg
      @chg-vq6kg 11 місяців тому +1

      The j20 is not a fighter but an interceptor, characterized by high speed and range, so there is no fuel shortage

  • @djzoodude
    @djzoodude 11 місяців тому +3

    I would just like to note that this is literally every modernized warplane the Chinese have vs just the USAF. It's not including the Navy or the Marines, and the Chinese are still outnumbered. Really puts things into perspective.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 11 місяців тому +2

      china doesn't have a global military empire so it doesn't need an airforce that large.

    • @djzoodude
      @djzoodude 11 місяців тому +2

      @@hughmungus2760 If by that you mean China isn't a global superpower, then yes, you are correct.

    • @92HazelMocha
      @92HazelMocha 11 місяців тому +2

      Its definitely not. The J8's and JH7's were omitted and China's navy isn't aircraft focused like ours is so you can't really compare naval assets.

    • @djzoodude
      @djzoodude 11 місяців тому +1

      @@92HazelMocha I feel like he gave a pretty good rationale for omitting the J-8s and J-7s. They are basically modified MiG-21s. They do, technically, make up the numbers shortfall, but in a fight like this they wouldn't be able to do much. The Chinese mostly use them as trainers and expendable recon aircraft.

    • @92HazelMocha
      @92HazelMocha 11 місяців тому +1

      ​​​@@djzoodudeThey are *not* modified Mig21's. They're very very different aircraft, we're even getting a proper J8 module for DCS and the cockpit looks closer to an F16 than a Mig. And since they recently upgraded their J8 and JH7 inventory to be compatible with the SD10, they're far from trainer aircraft. Granted they'll eventually toss them in favor of J16's and J20's, but it would be like discounting Vipers just because we also have F35's.

  • @Coopdaddy70
    @Coopdaddy70 11 місяців тому +1

    Great video. I wonder if the outcome would be very different if you started the stealth fighters on both sides first, as would be standard practice and then unleashed the lower-tiered aircraft into the fray. Thoughts?

  • @BarbosaUral
    @BarbosaUral 11 місяців тому +4

    This viewington declares a draw. If not; an American pyrrhic victory. Scale it down to 5% and add SAMs and AWACs. Go for a tactical battle and victory to see what side prevails.

  • @spartan078ben
    @spartan078ben 8 місяців тому +1

    You would probably need a Cray Supercomputer to run this sim to scale.

  • @xenaguy01
    @xenaguy01 11 місяців тому +6

    25:45 Will the F-35s actually fight this time?

  • @raymondshaw5685
    @raymondshaw5685 11 місяців тому +7

    wouldnt the Stealthy F-22 / F-35 combo have headed up this fight?

    • @toastrecon
      @toastrecon 11 місяців тому +1

      Yeah. I mean, it's just for fun, but no way would they just send the F-16s in first one at a time as they took off.

    • @jestermarcus
      @jestermarcus 11 місяців тому +1

      I've been wondering the same. Wouldn't mind seeing the Stealths sent in first and then the 4th gens duke it out.

    • @GageEakins
      @GageEakins 11 місяців тому

      @@jestermarcus Yes. the issue is their server just can't handle a fight this big so they need planes to die to keep the framerate stable.

  • @briansboucher
    @briansboucher 11 місяців тому

    best play by play ever...thanks mate

  • @anthonyb5279
    @anthonyb5279 11 місяців тому +5

    Many OA-K1a's Have been delivered a long time ago. Most have gone to the DEA.

    • @anthonyb5279
      @anthonyb5279 11 місяців тому

      @@calebjohnson6423 You would be surprised but yea I designed them spray Agent Orange on cocaine fields and blow up drug labs. Drug lords have Anti Aircraft systems it was designed to doge missiles. We did do dissimilar combat training because they also have fighter jets mostly Su-27. This plane is slow but is more maneuverable than any thing but a DR1 do NOT try and dogfight it. Its hard to Boom and zoom it too it can jink like nothing else in the world. The armor is CRAZY! way more than it needs. To date we have never lost a pilot.

  • @hurnn1543
    @hurnn1543 11 місяців тому +3

    If the American side lead with their stealth it would have never even been close.

  • @CHLBUTTERWORTH
    @CHLBUTTERWORTH 11 місяців тому +1

    Does having the pylons on the F-22 and F-35 affect the RCS of them? They can eejct them to ge their RCS back to the level they had before external stores/fuel tanks

  • @elijahcrowe6817
    @elijahcrowe6817 11 місяців тому +2

    The F-22 is by far my favorite fighter of all time! Not just because it IS the best, but it's also just super badass😂

    • @dexlab7539
      @dexlab7539 11 місяців тому +1

      Yup, and the balloon kill was worth the trillions spent on them 😂

  • @lllxlxii569
    @lllxlxii569 11 місяців тому +5

    Now Imagine if it was the navy marine and Air Force

    • @jamison884
      @jamison884 11 місяців тому +2

      Yup, and a fair fight may even be the US Navy and USMC vs. the Chinese AF (without the USAF altogether). USN and USMC have roughly ~1,200 fighter capable aircraft, from F-35B/C, F-18C & E/F/G, AV-8. Once they have all of their F-35s delivered, they should have a combined 700+, granted that's awhile from now.

  • @zaneroskoph7460
    @zaneroskoph7460 11 місяців тому +1

    Seeing the F-22s charging in got me thinking: since the detection range is the limiting factor against 5th gen aircraft, in a 5th gen v. 5th gen fight, wouldn’t a load out favoring Fox 2s provide equal attack range while being lighter, cheaper, and harder to evade?

  • @johnfbm
    @johnfbm 11 місяців тому +2

    Needless to say after this battle Bangladesh became a world power with 4 piper cubs.

  • @moshmeary51
    @moshmeary51 11 місяців тому +3

    We should do a drinking game where we take a sip each time Cap says “USAF”
    Idk why it cracks me up so much you pronounce the acronym

  • @leninstimpy
    @leninstimpy 11 місяців тому +2

    I don't volunteer to be a 4th gen fighter pilot.

  • @SALSASOULRECORDS
    @SALSASOULRECORDS 11 місяців тому +1

    Im having problems with my horas x56 ghost key pressing.
    Any tips how to solve this issue please?
    Many thanks for all your great videos.

  • @TheGamingGeeksSwe
    @TheGamingGeeksSwe 11 місяців тому +3

    i hope one day you could do this full scale

  • @ivorharden
    @ivorharden 11 місяців тому +2

    I vaguely remember commenting this what if scenario on another video

    • @pahtar7189
      @pahtar7189 11 місяців тому +1

      Me too. Deja vu? Mandela effect?

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  11 місяців тому

      This is improved version with everything working.

  • @reghardmostert8425
    @reghardmostert8425 11 місяців тому +1

    Great battle !! Felt like Blue humans where nowhere and thus the big losses🤔

  • @vector8877
    @vector8877 11 місяців тому +21

    I feel like something affecting the initial kills and losses before the stealth came in was the fact far more Americans were in the air than Chinese. There were far more Americans to kill than there were Chinese for them. Hence a lot of the AMRAAMs fired also went to waste and were concentrated on a few Chinese while there were far more people able to be killed for the Chinese.

  • @ltitus8900
    @ltitus8900 11 місяців тому +2

    The advanced antiair systems on each get are not modeled correctly and, to make matters worse, the AI is not modeled to evade correctly and do not adjust to the threats in real time (in regards to evasion). Further more, the F15EX new missile warning and evasion systems are not modeled correctly. The only models in this sim that stood a chance to make a difference (and it showed clearly) is the PL missiles and stealth aircrafts. And the AI does not know how to maximize the stealth capabilities.

  • @synchronicmindless
    @synchronicmindless 11 місяців тому +1

    Everytime I hear Brandon talking I keep thinking: Why is Nyck de Vries calling himself Brandon....

  • @kaizv6918
    @kaizv6918 11 місяців тому +2

    now we need USAF and Navy together

  • @TheJTcreate
    @TheJTcreate 10 місяців тому +1

    well, in reality, the American Stealth fighters would have been a lot harder to hit with missiles, even with WVR. But definitely entertaining.

  • @scott_dex
    @scott_dex 11 місяців тому +4

    Surprised to see an almost equal fight.

  • @polarking888
    @polarking888 11 місяців тому +1

    We love being valued

  • @snowmochi1373
    @snowmochi1373 10 місяців тому

    I wonder what adding ea-18g growler would do to this scenario. That’d be super interesting

  • @matthewellisor5835
    @matthewellisor5835 11 місяців тому +2

    15:18
    Because inches>centimeters but we only brag in the pub or in semi-polite company.
    Lofted, it'll do about 140,000 cubits more than nameplate and the electrical supply is greater than needed for it's greatest conceivable range.
    Come on, we're the ones who turned retired artillery barrels into bunker Eff'you!s on the order of a few weeks, dropped tests (of one dummy and one filled with hate) and loaded the other two for the discontinuity-of-life for a few guys.
    Also, the world's second largest naval force (by tonnage) is our museum fleet and there are, at the least, 2.6 firearms for every man, woman and child (including undocumented aliens) in CONUS. We don't need to exaggerate.
    ;D

  • @GlitchyGamers18
    @GlitchyGamers18 11 місяців тому

    Great wargame cap. One thing I’m curious with is why all the modded aircraft use the the same engine sound effects? Is it an engine limitation or have you guys just not gotten around to it

  • @Anarchy_420
    @Anarchy_420 11 місяців тому +5

    I personally liked the two wave scenario, its kinda more realistic that way, the battle would escalate, and logically more Planes would enter the battle plus the way you set it up was spot on as the more/mostly advanced Planes were in the second wave! Btw F-15EX looking very sexy!👍👍

    • @Anarchy_420
      @Anarchy_420 11 місяців тому +1

      However..... still looks like D3's are underperforming, seems like they have a drop lock problem, and especially in comparison :( which I certainly don't believe would be the case!

    • @Anarchy_420
      @Anarchy_420 11 місяців тому +1

      29:46 lol you already answered your question Cap the U.S. fired more missiles and are losing more Planes at the same time... answer is simple, it's the missiles... PL-15's are over performing while D3's are dropping locks like crazy, the evidence speaks for itself right there in that moment your mentioning😅

    • @pike100
      @pike100 11 місяців тому +1

      Anarchy, no, the most advanced planes would go in 1st. Then the 4th generation jets, loaded up as missile trucks, would come in behind the stealthy jets. Look at how the U.S. fought Desert Storm against Iraq - we sent in the F-117s and Wild Weasels first to make a safer path for our less sophisticated aircraft.

    • @Anarchy_420
      @Anarchy_420 11 місяців тому

      @@pike100 Yeah but that was a real conflict with actual tactics, this involves essentially no tactics...

  • @romanschaub3790
    @romanschaub3790 11 місяців тому +1

    Cap = best sport commentator!!

  • @waynesworldofsci-tech
    @waynesworldofsci-tech 11 місяців тому

    Bloody beautiful.

  • @manyminichin
    @manyminichin 11 місяців тому +1

    What does the number under the jets icon present when in map view?

  • @rastaboy_gamesnstuff7778
    @rastaboy_gamesnstuff7778 11 місяців тому +1

    Valued request to simulate the entirety using 10 allowed spawns, (9 respawns) for each craft. If possible.

  • @PhoenixCMDRAce
    @PhoenixCMDRAce 10 місяців тому

    Oh and A RAPTOR JOINS IN ASWELL!!! at 39:09 is so funny

  • @NigelTufnel612
    @NigelTufnel612 11 місяців тому

    Does the software take into account variences in pilot training and combat experience, the lack of Chinese battle testing of planes and missiles, along with radar capability deficits?

  • @mobilegamer8922
    @mobilegamer8922 2 місяці тому

    If playing on a gaming laptop, how do you switch between camera angles and views? Also between the camera and map?

  • @timwarren5021
    @timwarren5021 11 місяців тому +1

    E-11 is not a C2 platform it is a comms relay platform only.

  • @BrOckSams0n
    @BrOckSams0n 10 місяців тому +1

    "front line capable" ... oh c'mon. let'em fight!

  • @countbatculabrucetepes1959
    @countbatculabrucetepes1959 11 місяців тому +2

    If Cortana was piloting one of these f-22's my goodness the amount of kills😅

    • @pike100
      @pike100 11 місяців тому +2

      Count, same thing would be true for the people's champ, Simba. 😊

    • @countbatculabrucetepes1959
      @countbatculabrucetepes1959 11 місяців тому

      @@pike100 Simba is masterful at notching missiles no doubt

  • @graemeporter
    @graemeporter 11 місяців тому +1

    Cap - are you in any way related to the late, great Murray Walker? Getting some real 1990s F1 commentary vibes from this vid!

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  11 місяців тому

      I loved Murray, possible the world's best commentator?

    • @graemeporter
      @graemeporter 11 місяців тому +1

      @@grimreapers It was 100% his pure deep-seated love and enthusiasm for the sport that made him the commentator he was - you could tell how much he loved watching the racing, loved the cars, knew the teams, knew the drivers - everything. F1 was never the same after he retired.
      I get the same impression of you with military aviation - you're doing what you love doing, and it shows.

  • @matthewcox7985
    @matthewcox7985 11 місяців тому +1

    Matter of curiosity, for Cap: do sportscasters get any kind of vocal training? You might want to have a look into this, you certainly sounded like you were announcing a football match!

    • @pike100
      @pike100 11 місяців тому

      Cap doesn't need any vocal training; he already does a great job. 👍

  • @Xerethane
    @Xerethane 11 місяців тому +1

    That was a fun one today, a great all out brawl. An idea for you: In the video "Army George Shows: What A Viable Chinese Invasion Of Taiwan Could Look Like (WarGames 148) | DCS" we see China successfully invade Taiwan and kill a carrier using its new missile tech and transports flying in behind in the wake. What would an American response look like? Lets say its a few weeks to a month or so later and fighting is continuing on Taiwan. The US wants to get in the fighting and start to squeeze China's economy. I think the next move would be the US shutting down the strait of Malacca and then a battle between the Chinese carrier and the small island bases it's made in the south China sea vs a much larger US force, probably consisting of 2+ carriers. Is that or something similar viable in DCS?

  • @cuz129
    @cuz129 11 місяців тому +1

    That's sarcasm, by the way. Love it!

  • @jamieaulbach5120
    @jamieaulbach5120 11 місяців тому +1

    There is only 20 B-2 after the crash at Guam.

  • @Mr.Su-35Flanker-E
    @Mr.Su-35Flanker-E 11 місяців тому +2

    Can you do S-500 vs. B-21, B-2, F-22 and F-35?

  • @Tratios
    @Tratios 10 місяців тому

    With all of those fuel tanks and missles.. all of those planes must feel like flying dump trucks

  • @Maeyanie
    @Maeyanie 11 місяців тому +1

    Is this a reupload, Cap? I seem to remember hearing this briefing before.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  11 місяців тому +1

      This is improved version with everything working.

    • @Maeyanie
      @Maeyanie 11 місяців тому

      @@grimreapers Oh, okay, usually it's more obvious when you do that. Thanks for the answer. :)

  • @Overthemountaim747
    @Overthemountaim747 11 місяців тому +1

    What super cap cpu is in use? That poor thing must be steaming after the last few months.

  • @CaptainSpacedOut
    @CaptainSpacedOut 11 місяців тому

    Raptor: LOOKS LIKE MEATS ON THE MENU BOYS

  • @ggravett
    @ggravett 11 місяців тому +2

    And then there is still the US Navy and their fighters. TIL there are no F-18s in the US Airforce.

  • @sweatybotfn9982
    @sweatybotfn9982 11 місяців тому +2

    Still impressed that J-11 could take down raptors

  • @11ccom
    @11ccom 11 місяців тому

    Dam good stuff.

  • @cassius_eu5970
    @cassius_eu5970 11 місяців тому +9

    In your first video you did on Grim Reapers 2, you said you weren't using AIM-120D3s because they are only in service in extremely small numbers. Why did you change it for this video? If using missiles that have only very recently entered service, it would have been fairer to use PL-17s too and not just update the American ones, since PL-17s entered service with the PLAAF in 2022 as well.

    • @LuoSon312_G8
      @LuoSon312_G8 11 місяців тому +8

      they got flamed by antis being triggered that the simulated Chinese basically fought the USAF to a draw.
      siting everything the human and AI pilots did in the video as rigged, and unrealistic.
      they wanted an absolute stomp; to brag that NOTHING rivals the USAF, to dumb down the enemy AI, while maxing out the USAF AI. as well as downgrade enemy hardware, while upgrading theirs.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 11 місяців тому +5

      PL17s are anti-AWACs/Tanker missiles that can only be carried on flankers, and they'd Severely limit the firepower on said flankers to probably 4 PL17 and 2 PL10 at best.

    • @jhninkin
      @jhninkin 11 місяців тому +3

      @@LuoSon312_G8 if that was the case they would be using the aim-260

    • @gups4963
      @gups4963 11 місяців тому

      @@jhninkin Which are almost 100% in service now

    • @92HazelMocha
      @92HazelMocha 11 місяців тому +2

      Same reason the F35 and F22 fuel tanks didn't effect the RCS of the planes lol. And the reason the JH-7's and J8's were excluded.