F-22 Raptor vs F-35 Lightning II (Aircraft Comparison of Fifth Generation Aircraft)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 тра 2024
  • The F-35 and the F-22 are both 5th Generation fighters featuring advanced stealth, integrated avionics, sensor fusion, and superior logistics support. The F-35 also delivers additional 5th Generation features, such as multi-spectral sensors, interoperability, and modernized avionics.
    The F-35 and the F-22 are the world's two premier fighters, but there are some differences between the aircraft. The F-35 is optimized to be a multirole fighter, with the ability to perform air-to-air, air-to-ground and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) missions. While the F-22 is superior to the F-35 in air-to-air missions, the F-35’s air-to-air capability is superior to all other fighters. The F-35 is better than any other fighter aircraft, including the F-22, for air-to-ground strike missions.
    ► More Military videos on ‘THE BUZZ’: • 10 Most Powerful Howit...
    The Buzz does not own the rights to these pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images to be credited or removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.
    #military #thebuzz
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 284

  • @thebuzz4108
    @thebuzz4108  3 роки тому +7

    More Military Videos on our Channel 👇
    ua-cam.com/video/Vs2wtF8nseo/v-deo.html

  • @beachbumLifestyle
    @beachbumLifestyle 3 роки тому +249

    The f-22 looks more bad ass

    • @Caktusdud.
      @Caktusdud. 3 роки тому +3

      And expensive
      To the point of not being used lol

    • @Caktusdud.
      @Caktusdud. 3 роки тому +1

      @@feyd1955 to be fair you do have a point. The line of aircraft from the fr have been fairly similar
      They do have their differences but the most that has actually changed is hardware and software use, stealth introduction and cost.

    • @Caktusdud.
      @Caktusdud. 3 роки тому

      @@feyd1955 I never said anything about replacing the f 22 or 10 especially the a10

    • @JohntavionquaviousPringle
      @JohntavionquaviousPringle 2 роки тому

      Agreed

    • @SMhydra
      @SMhydra 2 роки тому +1

      F35 is multirole while the f22 isn't making the f35 far more useful

  • @ismailabdukadir1130
    @ismailabdukadir1130 3 роки тому +63

    They are like to each other as F 15 and F 16!

  • @tegrity5822
    @tegrity5822 3 роки тому +174

    The f-22 is classified. nobody knows its exact numbers

    • @loay200091
      @loay200091 3 роки тому +14

      china knows everything about both f22 and f35 thank to isreal

    • @JohntavionquaviousPringle
      @JohntavionquaviousPringle 2 роки тому +5

      @@MrMrvin27 Yeah, check out their J-31, it’s clearly a cheap copy
      ua-cam.com/video/xB5yiYTPaAE/v-deo.html

    • @LordOfPanzers
      @LordOfPanzers 2 роки тому

      @@MrMrvin27 Because they dont want the most powerful jets fighting against him in an possible world war.

    • @c-137rare4
      @c-137rare4 2 роки тому +10

      @@loay200091 theres no way in hell the us would give isreal the f-22

    • @bazzhm1447
      @bazzhm1447 2 роки тому

      Thats true but some fake expert channels even made false description of f22 in order to selling out their t50pf 57. I dont believe f22 cost unit was 350million $

  • @TitioVlad
    @TitioVlad 3 роки тому +55

    The F-35 tried to be the best in everything, failed all.
    The F-22 knows his role, and it is the absolute king when it comes to air superiority.

    • @lolgg3707
      @lolgg3707 3 роки тому +7

      If you ask me I believe that f35 is a little bit better. But that depends also on which country you live. Different countries means different military needs.

    • @lolgg3707
      @lolgg3707 3 роки тому +1

      @@Fleshyrabist I know that's what I said

    • @lolgg3707
      @lolgg3707 3 роки тому +12

      @Buddy Mac F35 is a multi role fighter plane. You can use it with many different ways. F22 is mostly an air superiority fighter. Us it's a big country and has the option or the luxury to use different fighters. Greece for example my country, doesn't have this luxury. Planes here must fit for every role bc they will be more efficient and more practical.

    • @Caktusdud.
      @Caktusdud. 3 роки тому +1

      @Preston Schreck I like like yf-23 as well if anything it is said that the yf- 23 was better but the f-22 won due to some previous issues with the company that made the yf-23 so f-22 won
      But weird in my opinion

    • @lolgg3707
      @lolgg3707 3 роки тому

      @Preston Schreck in a dogfight pilots are those who matter not the plane itself. In Greece there was a competition between US f22 and the Greek f16 bock 50 in TDM type of game. You lock your target and he has to land in the ground. The Greek f16s won this competition.

  • @user-vy2bz5fl8k
    @user-vy2bz5fl8k 2 роки тому +77

    Outdated or not, the F22 will always remain one of the most beautiful machines designed by mankind.

    • @lilzn1per
      @lilzn1per Рік тому

      I find the historical planes beautiful

    • @seamali4383
      @seamali4383 Рік тому

      Killing machines, but I get your point and I agree

    • @chanmanthegreat1429
      @chanmanthegreat1429 Рік тому

      @@seamali4383 there's poetic beauty to be seen in that though. One of the most beautiful things we have ever created is also the deadliest. I find that poetic and beautiful in a way.

    • @Waxenthrone
      @Waxenthrone 10 місяців тому

      Hell yeah!!

  • @JohntavionquaviousPringle
    @JohntavionquaviousPringle 2 роки тому +24

    Ahh yes, the comment section, where every person that watches these videos is an expert

    • @GermanGreetings
      @GermanGreetings 2 роки тому

      Sorry: Reading the comments close to june2022,
      you are the first `non-rational`, I met here.

  • @josh8957
    @josh8957 3 роки тому +32

    F22 is better especially in looks

    • @th3gov3rnm3nt
      @th3gov3rnm3nt 2 роки тому +1

      @Fred Garvin thats actually kind of wrong. Looks and shape of these aircraft must specifically be designed for stealth while the f22 is longer that the f35 it is far slimmer which is definitely going to make it less visible via radar

    • @th3gov3rnm3nt
      @th3gov3rnm3nt 2 роки тому +1

      @Fred Garvin logic? If you have a slimmer profile your gonna have less points of contact for radar to bounce off of, which reduces your radar profile.

    • @th3gov3rnm3nt
      @th3gov3rnm3nt 2 роки тому

      @Fred Garvin are you gonna make a point?

    • @Shinkaaaa
      @Shinkaaaa 2 роки тому +1

      @@th3gov3rnm3nt apparently he doesn't

  • @krisfrederick5001
    @krisfrederick5001 2 роки тому +14

    The F-22 is far more beautiful. The F-35 is its chubby younger sister, but still attractive and effective.

    • @Damitsall
      @Damitsall Рік тому +1

      The F35s nickname is Fat Amy lol.

    • @vibratingstring
      @vibratingstring Рік тому

      If we are judging on beauty I'll take an A4 thank you very much

  • @MrGriff305
    @MrGriff305 3 роки тому +19

    This video has a lot of wrong information.

  • @Toppradd
    @Toppradd Рік тому

    Excellent vlog !!! Exactly what as advertised.. perfect graphics overlays, grouping, dimension, n armament.. vocals were paced nicely .. .. Well done folks.. tnx DB Ohio

  • @seanohsee7329
    @seanohsee7329 2 роки тому +33

    The thrust comparison forgot that the F-22 has two engines. Combined they give 70,000lbs thrust (not the 35,000 displayed).

  • @icewallowcome_daily9802
    @icewallowcome_daily9802 2 роки тому +14

    not gonna lie the f35 looks is grown on me.

  • @miduv82
    @miduv82 3 роки тому +26

    The F22 is almost a P51 flying at full speed faster than the F35.

  • @zopoua.992
    @zopoua.992 2 роки тому +37

    The F22 is more manuverable than the F35. But it’s less armed. Also, it’s a Fighter aircraft. The F35 is both attack and fighter.
    F35 has better avionics, bigger payload, and is VTOL

    • @Ryan-vc4lr
      @Ryan-vc4lr 2 роки тому +1

      Only the F-35b is vtol and it has lower top speed, is less maneuverable and can't carry the same armaments.

    • @Damitsall
      @Damitsall Рік тому +3

      No the F22 has a bigger payload, it's actually pretty obvious just from looking at it. The F35 has a 2 door weapons bay that holds 4 AAMRAMs. The F22 has 2 side bays that usually hold a Sidewinder in each, then it's 2 door weapons bay holds 6. The F22 also has missle pods that can be mounted on the wings but I think the F35 has something similar too. Anyways the F22 holds 2X as much in internal weapon bays. The F22 is also more stealthy even though it's bigger and older. There's a lot of secrets in the F22.

    • @MasterKoala777
      @MasterKoala777 Рік тому +1

      Why isn’t the F-35 designated as F/A-35 if it’s both a fighter and attack aircraft?

    • @roboparks
      @roboparks Рік тому

      the F22 is a Land Fighter that's why only the USAF uses it, it a larger plane to big to put on a carrier.

    • @RSK-GamerZ
      @RSK-GamerZ Рік тому

      @@Damitsall That's not true, the F-35 is superior to the F-22 in terms of stealth. It is apparently less stealthy from the stern aspect, but not operationally significantly so. The F-35 is stealthier in stray electronic noise suppression, communication & aspect-dependent IR signature. At part throttle they are similar in rear-aspect IR signature, but the F-22 is less IR stealthy in full AB. The F-35 is also stealthier in long-range target-search, tracking, & radar missile queuing. Both are comparable in radar-search stealth, but the F-35 has undetectable passive search, track and attack capability that substantially out-ranges the F-22’s FLIR & new IRST.

  • @bembs0256
    @bembs0256 3 роки тому +13

    People: debating F-22 vs F-35
    Me: *F-15 master race*

    • @myusername3689
      @myusername3689 3 роки тому +1

      F-15 ACTIVE

    • @krthecarguy5150
      @krthecarguy5150 3 роки тому +1

      Fun fact, if the F-15EX will serve as long as its current batch can, the F-15 will have served for over 165 years

    • @clarkkentll5490
      @clarkkentll5490 2 роки тому

      F117

  • @ismailabdukadir1130
    @ismailabdukadir1130 3 роки тому +11

    F 22 service ceiling is 65,000 ft (20,000 m)

  • @mustaine2438
    @mustaine2438 2 роки тому +8

    The Raptor is absolute badass..

  • @pl2996
    @pl2996 Рік тому

    me while watching this video and eating potato chips: "Yup, I understood all of that."

  • @joebloggs9392
    @joebloggs9392 3 роки тому +17

    Designed for different roles - F-22 is air superiority/dogfighter, F-35 designed to not be seen (go in, get job done, get out) well before defences can be up. Personally not fighting at all but delivering a devastating blow is more effective than hand-to-hand combat

    • @joebloggs9392
      @joebloggs9392 3 роки тому +4

      Elight
      It is not - you cannot make a plane out of metal and it be “invisible”. Stealth is designed to be a minimization on the radar, with a similar signature to a bird, but within 15 miles or so the enemy will know it’s a plane. That’s good enough because there is little time to prepare before the objective is met and departure made. F-35 also has these radar absorbing materials applied, giving “stealth” capability but not with weapons on, as the weapons cannot have stealth features. You either choose to go in “stealth” for surveillance, or weapons on to deliver the payload (not stealth).

    • @joebloggs9392
      @joebloggs9392 3 роки тому +3

      Elight
      There is so much more to these 5th Gen fighters than speed or dogfighting. F-35 is not for dogfighting and not designed to outrun - but that’s not to say by any means they are defenceless... only a select few people know the full extent of onboard technologies on the F-35 and I’m pretty sure they’ve run a risk analysis vs a F-15 and anything else for that matter. If the F-35 gets in trouble behind enemy lines, they will need support in the form of faster, more manoeuverable fighters to distract, or multiple F-35’s that can share a common target - if an F-15 pilot can outclass multiple F-35’s working together (and yes F-35 can communicate together between jets to share a common target).

    • @Caktusdud.
      @Caktusdud. 3 роки тому

      The f-35 is the introvert of the skies

    • @stevem2323
      @stevem2323 2 роки тому

      @@joebloggs9392 F 22 can do exactly that too, on top of the being an absolute number 1 in dog fighting.

  • @mexicandream7779
    @mexicandream7779 3 роки тому +7

    They mentioned the F-35 is used by the Royal airforce, just wanted to add that thr F-35 is used by the Royal navy on the Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales aircraft carriers

  • @forzaisspeed
    @forzaisspeed 3 роки тому +14

    The F-35 ceiling is 50,000f, the F-22's is 65,000f same as the Eurofighter's.

    • @Damitsall
      @Damitsall 3 роки тому +3

      Yea I was going to say, some of those stats are off. Frankly we don't know that much about the F22 anyways because a lot of information is still top secret. Its USA only, because its the best air superiority fighter in the world. Wheras everyone got in on the F35, and its a multirole aircraft.

    • @stevem2323
      @stevem2323 2 роки тому +1

      You don't know what is the ceiling for the F 22, it's probably more.

  • @MrGriff305
    @MrGriff305 3 роки тому +9

    F-35 has 43,000 lbs thrust and they're pushing it to 48,000 eventually.

    • @forzaisspeed
      @forzaisspeed 3 роки тому

      The F-35 is 40,000ibf of Thrust.

    • @MrGriff305
      @MrGriff305 3 роки тому +3

      @@forzaisspeed Not true.. it's over 43,000 nationalinterest.org/feature/f-35-needs-bigger-more-powerful-engine-12491

  • @legomilsimguy1941
    @legomilsimguy1941 3 роки тому +14

    The F35 is smaller, but both of them are still my favorite Jets

  • @glared
    @glared 3 роки тому +4

    F-35 can be whatever you want but it was a disaster for the Pentagon’s budget..

  • @matthewbuxton2200
    @matthewbuxton2200 2 роки тому +2

    Anybody else still got the F 22 raptor game you can get a lot more information I think out of the game than they gave you here except for the price points

  • @vincentgoudreault9662
    @vincentgoudreault9662 3 роки тому +12

    This is garbage, comparing the thrust of engines in this manner. The F-22 has 2, which means it can have up to 70000 pounds of thrust overall, against the 43000 of single engine of the F-35.

    • @walangpart2
      @walangpart2 3 роки тому +1

      BRO REMEMBER THEY'VE PUT TWO ENGINES BUT REDUCED THE POWER AND SIZE TO REDUCE WAIT.
      IN F 35 ONLY KNE ENGINE BUT MORE POWERFUL THAT THE RAPTOR'S TWO ENGINE. IT IS LIKE 2

    • @nickh5081
      @nickh5081 3 роки тому +4

      @@walangpart2 The Raptor has TWO 35,000 lb thrust engines for a total of 70,000 lbs of thrust. This is why it's so much faster and has a much higher rate of climb. Why is this so hard to understand?

  • @Mikishots
    @Mikishots Рік тому

    Wow, those unit costs are completely out to lunch.

  • @_rathore_jayant_singh_7773
    @_rathore_jayant_singh_7773 3 роки тому +1

    Funtastic

  • @TheOrigionalPineapple
    @TheOrigionalPineapple 3 роки тому +12

    F-22: beat air to air
    A-10:beat air to ground
    F-35: best of both world

    • @natahx2787
      @natahx2787 2 роки тому +6

      Jack of all trades, master of none

  • @LuminescentMonk
    @LuminescentMonk Рік тому +1

    They're designed to be complimentary to each other. The F22 is meant to be an air superiority fighter, whereas the F35 is meant to be air to ground attacker with the ability to defend itself if needed. The F22 is better by design and intentionally so, hence why we sell the F35 to other countries but laugh you out of the room at the notion of giving someone else an F22 lol

  • @SriHari722
    @SriHari722 3 роки тому +2

    2:29 2547 or 2574?

  • @nonormies2605
    @nonormies2605 2 роки тому +7

    The f35 has a A, B, and C model, they combined stats from all 3.

  • @UrijahBen74
    @UrijahBen74 7 місяців тому

    The only reason they won’t completely get rid of the F 22s is because we sold the F 35 to other countrie, if we get rid of the F-22 Raptor we won’t have anything to defeat the F35 Lightning…

  • @Kurokaze68
    @Kurokaze68 3 роки тому

    f 22 vs su 57? please

  • @speedkiller3026
    @speedkiller3026 2 роки тому

    the F22 is like a proper F15 MK2

  • @tpolerex7282
    @tpolerex7282 7 місяців тому

    Would it have been that difficult to just show the two jets at the same scale?! The much smaller F35 appears larger than the F22.

  • @nesseihtgnay9419
    @nesseihtgnay9419 3 роки тому +6

    These two are the only two true 5th gen jets.

    • @DrScarface74
      @DrScarface74 3 роки тому

      Neither of them is in fact rofl

    • @notsure5955
      @notsure5955 3 роки тому +1

      Lol, best joke I’ve heard/read this year.

    • @jameswilliam5247
      @jameswilliam5247 3 роки тому +1

      Very true

    • @j1qqlydixkurayami72
      @j1qqlydixkurayami72 3 роки тому +3

      @@DrScarface74 F-22 was the first jet to incorporate stealth supercruise supermaneuverability(thrust vectoring) and sensor fusion into one weapon platform that’s 5th gen

  • @ankitdhawade5174
    @ankitdhawade5174 3 роки тому +9

    Make a comparison of India's LCH helicopter vs Chinese Z-10 helicopter

  • @AdSd100
    @AdSd100 2 роки тому +2

    What's the difference in role? Why design, manufacture and maintain two separate planes instead of having one? Would have been nice to have this fundamental question answered instead of reading spec numbers from Wikipedia.

    • @Ironsights51
      @Ironsights51 2 роки тому +9

      The F-22 is specifically a dogfighter, and by far the best in the world. That’s it’s only role pretty much, so every aspect of it is catered towards things like maneuverability and thrust.
      The F-35 is an all purpose fighter. It needs to be good in dogfights, and it is, but it also needs to be able to perform air-to-ground missions and such. That’s why it has the increased payload, the better avionics and equipment, and that’s also why Pratt and Whitney and GE Aviation are currently designing adaptive cycle engines to fit it. It’s the Jack of all trades, and the F-22 is the King of the skies.
      Both are fantastic aircraft that were never meant to be pitted against one another. They’re the best in the world at what they were designed for.

    • @GermanGreetings
      @GermanGreetings 2 роки тому

      @@Ironsights51 A good explanation. Thank you, Sir.

  • @Dan-zz8mz
    @Dan-zz8mz 3 роки тому +3

    the F-22s max speed is 2414 Km/h not 2557 Km/h

  • @jesseraina1614
    @jesseraina1614 Рік тому

    I think it was smart on canadas part buying a nuclear capable strategic stealth bomber. Even if canada wont host nukes on its land it builds them in allied countries and has the means to do so. And with this they can get a b61 nuke they made in uk and us and equip it if and when they need or want a nuke and practical switch it to a nuclear role overnight.

  • @akag8089
    @akag8089 2 роки тому +1

    USA never export 22 now u can imagine

  • @KenjiPN
    @KenjiPN 2 роки тому

    I thought they both had a top celling of 65,000ft ?

  • @bruh6259
    @bruh6259 Рік тому +1

    So the F22 is like 10x more expensive, and around 1.5x as good. thats pretty reasonable though

  • @Monalisa77753
    @Monalisa77753 2 роки тому +2

    F22 is amazing!

  • @megapet777
    @megapet777 Рік тому

    oh so basically f22 is f35 with less tech but 2x the engine power.

  • @mraviatorboii2510
    @mraviatorboii2510 3 роки тому +2

    Lot of wrong information in this vid.

  • @fredsalfa
    @fredsalfa 3 роки тому

    Who would win in a fight is the main comparison

    • @juandelarosa4257
      @juandelarosa4257 3 роки тому +4

      F22 would win it had the best technology theirs a reason why US congress band the selling of f22 because it’s just two good

    • @ragnaryt7452
      @ragnaryt7452 3 роки тому +1

      @@juandelarosa4257 yup they sold all of the airplanes except f22

  • @theidiotskiller6589
    @theidiotskiller6589 3 роки тому +9

    I think there is something secret in f35 make this plane stronger than f22

    • @kevinmucyo1665
      @kevinmucyo1665 3 роки тому +5

      The other way around

    • @Damitsall
      @Damitsall 3 роки тому +5

      The F22 is an air superiority fighter and the F35 is a multirole aircraft. In the air, against each other the F22 would win hands down, but its because they are designed for different purposes. Also nothing is secret on the F35, everyone has 1, whereas the F22 is top secret USA only.

    • @TBE99
      @TBE99 3 роки тому +2

      F22 has way more advanced secret tech. Just remember America doesn’t sell the F22 and it’s best tech to any country for a reason. 😎

  • @bry4n3
    @bry4n3 2 роки тому +1

    But how do they compare to a Toyota Hilux?

  • @markk3254
    @markk3254 3 місяці тому

    F-35: chirp chirp mother f-er

  • @aviationmd
    @aviationmd 3 роки тому +1

    My favourite is the F-35

  • @in9836
    @in9836 3 роки тому

    so the 35 is smaller and lighter but can carry more take off weight...interesting...

  • @trumanhw
    @trumanhw 2 роки тому +1

    Empty: 43,340 lb
    Gross: 64,840 lb
    MTOW : 83,500 lb
    Fuel : 18,000 lb
    Jets : 2 × F119-PW-100
    Power: 52,000 lb-ft (dry)
    Power: 70,000 lb-ft (wet)
    Speed: Mach 2.25 (1,500 mph) at altitude
    Speed: Mach 1.21 ( 921 mph) at sea level
    Speed: Mach 1.82 (1,220 mph) supercruise
    Range: 1,600 nmi (1,800 mi) Clean
    Range: 460 nmi ( 530 mi) Clean (with 100 nmi (115 mi) in supercruise
    Range: 590 nmi ( 679 mi) Clean (subsonic for duration)
    That nonsense of the F-35 having a higher MTOW than the F-22..?
    Who told you that ?
    The F35 A and C both have
    - slightly larger combat radii.
    - slightly less MTOW + weapons load (by only about 1k lbs)
    I shouldn't be able to spot the errors instantly in a video where you purport to explain things

  • @a15bionic59
    @a15bionic59 3 роки тому +3

    F22 is still better

  • @Tain950
    @Tain950 Рік тому

    Which Fighter Jet wins in a Dogfight until the death the F-22 or the F-35.

    • @nobodysenju1262
      @nobodysenju1262 Рік тому

      F-22 it was literally solely designed for dogfights, with better turn radius it should be pretty easy

  • @nathanielanderson4898
    @nathanielanderson4898 2 роки тому +1

    I love the F22. F35 is bad, but I like F22 better. I also love the F16 and F18. But they are old. However, I can imagine the sky black with United States fighters and bombers carrying out a special covert operation. This would be so terrifying.

  • @Slavic_Sky
    @Slavic_Sky Рік тому

    so what makes F-22 an outdated plane?

  • @Tuanod
    @Tuanod 3 роки тому +1

    Two flying troughs for which democracy watchers are asking for three times as much dollars as these planes cost.
    Thanks for the video! 👍

  • @bazzhm1447
    @bazzhm1447 2 роки тому

    Yess $150million , other yt channel said $350Million. I know they tried to sold out t50pf sukoi 57

  • @ericlou3405
    @ericlou3405 3 роки тому

    WE TALK TOO DAM MUCH ABOUT OUR WEAPONS. SMH

  • @silencer.4478
    @silencer.4478 2 роки тому +1

    F-22 is better in my opinion

  • @jorgecarbonell4725
    @jorgecarbonell4725 2 роки тому

    why that fast_!!?

  • @forzaisspeed
    @forzaisspeed 3 роки тому +1

    The F-22 speed is 1500mph.

  • @charlesbukowski9836
    @charlesbukowski9836 3 роки тому

    F14!!!!!! ANYTIME BABY!!!!!

  • @Monalisa77753
    @Monalisa77753 2 роки тому +1

    0:47 China will not accept this fact.
    Sorry, J20.

  • @rinrin-rl8ye
    @rinrin-rl8ye 3 роки тому

    ZHONGSHI YINGWEN NIMEN KANDE DONGMA

  • @scottwilliams6835
    @scottwilliams6835 3 роки тому

    Says F23 shows F35.

  • @timphelps1591
    @timphelps1591 2 роки тому +1

    F-22

  • @cergeil1805
    @cergeil1805 3 роки тому

    Ф35 не способен летать на сверхзвуке, дольше пары минут.

  • @DrScarface74
    @DrScarface74 3 роки тому +5

    F-35 isn't 5 gen. It isn't even 4++

  • @martycuhntzmart5635
    @martycuhntzmart5635 2 роки тому

    Flown both of them, I still love your mom more.

  • @fabriceboel57
    @fabriceboel57 2 роки тому

    Enfin la mitrailleuse du f35 on peut pas s'en servir sinon l'avion commence à perdre des morceaux

  • @user-vi8bv2ml7u
    @user-vi8bv2ml7u 3 роки тому +1

    Many compare American fighters against Chinese and Russian But The buzz is especially different from other UA-cams. It deserves 100,000 subscribers! By the way, I also have a channel about military. Let me see if anyone leaves a comment first, then the author will make a video about military topics that they want first commentator.

  • @tidepod10yearsago97
    @tidepod10yearsago97 3 роки тому +1

    F14 tomcat forever

  • @rinrin-rl8ye
    @rinrin-rl8ye 3 роки тому

    ZHEGE FEIJI HAISHI FEICHAN HAODE BUZHIDAO YOUMEIYOU REN KANDEDONG WO XIEDE YINGWEN

  • @ahmedammar521
    @ahmedammar521 3 роки тому +4

    I really need to borrow one of these f-22 to finish dictatorship on eastern side of Libya
    US please help

    • @Mohab7274
      @Mohab7274 3 роки тому +1

      Hahaha they will never give F-22 raptor to terrorists you wish. And eastern side of Libya doesn't even have a Dictator ship you liar

    • @KRYPTIA-mp4ol
      @KRYPTIA-mp4ol 3 роки тому

      The turkish puppet government is the dictatorship in libya

  • @kevinvojta692
    @kevinvojta692 3 роки тому +3

    The New Mig 41 is going to have a top speed of Mach 4.3 or 3,270 mph. Armed with Ks-172 - 210 mile range missiles.

    • @kevinvojta692
      @kevinvojta692 3 роки тому +1

      @Adolf Stalin Only fools think the US makes the best weapons. The Germans found that out the hard way.

    • @NCF8710
      @NCF8710 3 роки тому +9

      The new US sixth generation fighter will be equipped with phasers and photon torpedoes. See how easy that is?

    • @hendrikschuch
      @hendrikschuch 3 роки тому +2

      @@kevinvojta692 Wtf, when did they find out? haha

    • @kevinvojta692
      @kevinvojta692 3 роки тому

      @@hendrikschuch Easy US Defense Magazines.

    • @mykolamykhaliuk
      @mykolamykhaliuk Рік тому

      Only in your dreams and on paper. It will be even not produced. China will buy failed project and construct something better.

  • @informationinflux4458
    @informationinflux4458 3 роки тому +3

    No contest really. What has come from the F35 really?? Other than being years late and massively over budget costing over $1 TRILLION with R&D 😂😂

    • @mraviatorboii2510
      @mraviatorboii2510 3 роки тому +1

      It’s not a $1.5 trillion dollar plane. That's the estimated total lifetime ownership costs through 2070, including the ~$400 billion acquisition/R&D cost for 2,456 aircraft plus all upgrades, maintenance, spare parts, training (pilots and maintainers), logistics, infrastructure, simulators, technical manuals, etc.... Put differently (in perspective), ~2% of the annual defense budget. I say it’s worth it..

  • @trvebm7812
    @trvebm7812 3 роки тому +1

    All of these are just copy products. Real 5th generation fighter is J20 dragon!

    • @anishasgaonkar5491
      @anishasgaonkar5491 3 роки тому +2

      🤣🤣it's just a flop aircraft...

    • @batmankky
      @batmankky 3 роки тому +1

      J20 stands for Jia lat, Jia liao bi and Jiak Sai 20x. U understand our hock kian or not?

  • @laugenbrezel215
    @laugenbrezel215 3 роки тому

    Messerschmitt Wins

  • @MrGriff305
    @MrGriff305 3 роки тому +2

    The question is whether 3 F-35s would defeat 2 F-22s. I think that's the cost equation.

    • @Albertkallal
      @Albertkallal 3 роки тому +3

      The F35's will eat the f22s. The f22's are too old and missed all the technology that the F35 has
      As a result, the F35 will see, track and build a fire solution long before the f22 can do the same against the f35. It not even close.
      The F35 wins hands down

    • @j1qqlydixkurayami72
      @j1qqlydixkurayami72 3 роки тому +3

      @@Albertkallal the F22 was technology was updated in 2011

    • @Albertkallal
      @Albertkallal 3 роки тому +1

      @@j1qqlydixkurayami72
      Well, it received a better data link. But it did not get ANY passive detection system. So the f22 STILL has zero means to track and find a F35. They had planned a multi-spectrum IRST system for the F22. Then it cut to only have a single spectrum IRST system. Then the system was 100% cut from the program. As a result, the f22 is fine against non stealth jets, but against a stealth fighter like the F35? It simply missed the newer technologies.
      The F35 is a much newer technology platform, and it was designed under the assumption that most countries would be flying and building stealth jets. That has not happened.
      So most other nations failed to respond when the f117 came out with stealth.
      Then most nations failed to respond when the f22 came out.
      And now most nations failed to respond when the F35 came out.
      So the USA how now at least 2 or 3 generations of experience in building stealth jets, and how they work, and how they are to fight.
      The F35 was designed to fight against other stealth jets - not so with the f22.
      The f22 can ONLY use radar, and that is not sufficient. The F35 has full 360 degrees IRST tracking with its DAS system. That system is MUCH better then the IRST pods we see on some Russia and jets like the Rafael.
      As such, the F35 will start to see and find the f22 at about a range of 50 miles. Below that range, being both jets have stealth? Well the F35 has BETTER stealth and its tracking systems will produce a weapons grade lock on the f22 - and do so LONG BEFORE the f22 can do the same to the F35. The stealth should give cover down to about the 15 mile range - perhaps a bit less with the F35.
      The problem is that the F35 will see, find, track and target the f22 long before the f22 has a chance to see and find the F35.
      The result? The f22 is a sitting duck against the F35. The F35 simply has several systems that allow passive tracking and targeting without radar - and the F22 missed that technology refresh, and as a result is handicapped in a big way.

    • @j1qqlydixkurayami72
      @j1qqlydixkurayami72 3 роки тому +2

      @@Albertkallal bruh I’m not reading all that but Ik the f35 is the most advanced fighter but the F22 is directly behind it in terms of technology but it stomps the lighting in performance with a k/d of 108/0 In exercise northern edge and 6-0 against 6 F15s

    • @Albertkallal
      @Albertkallal 3 роки тому +2

      @@j1qqlydixkurayami72
      Well, you better start reading if you going to have a informed opinion and knowledge base which is required for you to make valid and logical conclusions.
      At the war games, the F35 is eating the f22's for lunch.
      You see, WAY back in the 1950's? Well, at that time speed of the jet was one of the more defining values required for a fighter jet.
      The issue is NOW jets fly fast enough. Adding additional speed to your jet does NOT translate into kills in the battle field.
      So does the f22 have award winning speed and what we call an kinetic abilities envelope? yes, it is 2nd to none in that area.
      However some extra speed does not rack up kills in the battle field. You have to see, track, and then produce a kill solution, and the F35 runs circles around the F22 for this kind of task.
      I mean, in the Falklands war? (1982)
      The Argentine air force had 175 Mach 2.0 able jets (French made Dassault Mirage III intercepttor jets).
      They also had French made Dassault Mirage V attack jets - they are rated at Mach 1.9!
      The British? They had some little turtle slow Harrier jump jets.
      Those Harrier jets could NOT EVEN hit Mach 1.0!!! - they were sub-sonic!!!
      So, on paper, 24 slow turtle moving SUB sonic jets are to take on a air force with 175+ Mach 2.0 able jets? Are you kidding me?
      Well, as history shows?
      The British TROUNCED the Argentine air force. Argentine lost about 45 jets and that does NOT include Argentine jets lost due to crashes.
      The British lost about 5 Harriers. 3 due to crashes, and 2 were shot down.
      The point? don't assume speed helps all that much.
      In the first and 2nd gulf wars (1991, and 2001). We saw USA fighters jets engage jets of all kinds from Russia and France and others.
      They found that ONLY 3% of the engagements used speeds above Mach 1.0. In other words, supersonic speed was BARELY used, and it was NOT a significant factor for 97% of the air battels.
      So Falklands war (1982): speed was not the deciding factor for jet fighter engagements.
      So Gulf war I - 1991: again, speed was not a deciding factor for jet engagements.
      So Gulf war II 2001: again, speed was not a deciding factor for jet fighter engagements.
      Now does speed matter? Sure it does. But as the Falklands war shows, a small bunch of 23 sub sonic jets took on jets that could hit Mach 2.0, and that speed advantage did not translate into a tactical advantage. Now there ARE cases where speed matters - but jets like the F35 can hit Mach 1.6 - and that is sufficient for about 97% of the tasks that such jets require.
      The simple matter right now in the air battlefield, the F35 will trounce the F22 - and the F22 simply has no real abilities to take on a F35.
      and if your not going to read any thing here? Then your not going to learn anything, and as a result you not learn from past battles, and how modern air battler engagements work, let alone recent war history that shows jets that can find targets first, and shoot to kill is what also wins the day - and the F35 is 2nd to none in this ability right now - and that includes engagements against the f22.
      I can only hope and pray that it is NOT you that ever makes a decision as to what a fighter jet needs or which ones to buy to win air battles, since you making the wrong assumptions.
      There is a great story in Gulf war I. Some Americans where in a armored troop carrier, and they had a high ranking Iraqi officer they had captured. On the big folding door in the armored vehicle there was a portrait (picture) of the German Field Marshal Rommel (famous for tank wars in the Desert - just like the Gulf war was - in the desert). The captured Iraqi officer who spoke broken english? He asked why do you have a picture of Field Marshal Rommel who was a enemy of the USA during World War II?
      And a very young solder in that transporter piped up and stated this to the Iraqi Officer:
      *_Perhaps if you had studied the tactics and ideas of Field Marshal Rommel, it would be us riding in your troop transporter and not the other way around!_*

  • @dhanashrikharsekar1376
    @dhanashrikharsekar1376 3 роки тому +2

    3rd like

  • @brandonbutlerdesign
    @brandonbutlerdesign 3 роки тому

    towards the end she starts to sound like my gf when I head downstairs during the horizontal polka

  • @bibou12Tt
    @bibou12Tt 2 роки тому

    The Russian Asukhoy is stronger than them in two

    • @menlay2k
      @menlay2k 2 роки тому +6

      then it breaks down and bursts into flames

    • @menlay2k
      @menlay2k 2 роки тому +2

      🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @SUNNYDAY-if8yo
    @SUNNYDAY-if8yo 3 роки тому +4

    F 35 is overpriced trash can't even come close to F22 raptor

    • @NCF8710
      @NCF8710 3 роки тому +3

      Where did you get your degree in aerospace engineering?

    • @forzaisspeed
      @forzaisspeed 3 роки тому

      The F-22 is old and outdated, plus its more expensive.

    • @pushpayadav6926
      @pushpayadav6926 3 роки тому +2

      @@forzaisspeed WHAT??!!! F22 IS MOST STEALTHIEST JET IN THE WORLD IT IS MORE FASTER THAN F-35 IT HAVE MORE RADAR RANGE IT ALSO FLY HIGHER THAN THE SHIT NAMED F-35 HOW THE HECK IT COULD WIN.....

    • @warcraftcombat1021
      @warcraftcombat1021 3 роки тому

      faron tilley OLD? HE IS FROM 2005 SAME AS ME SO YOURE CALLING ME OLD?

    • @nstice1
      @nstice1 3 роки тому

      The raptors ability to negate “stall” through design features and high maneuverability is unparalleled by any other aircraft in existence. Only the recent Russian SU class can come somewhat close. The F-35 has failed in this department miserably.

  • @forzaisspeed
    @forzaisspeed 3 роки тому +2

    The F-22 is old and outdated it can't do helf the stuff that most jet's can do, it relys on its stealth to much like the F-35, the F-22 has only one main radar system with no IRST or other systems to help plus it does not have a helmet lock on and fire system like most jet's, the performance is good with being one of the best not the best but still good, the Eurofighter has better specs and performance plus the Eurofighter is more advanced with better hardware and software, the F-35 really does not have any performance only stealth and software, and the software is still buggy as hell, 500+ bugs and the G3 Helmet still can't use a lot of its systems, the F-35 does have other systems on board not just relying on one radar system to find and track, the F-35 is not good in performance Hight of 50,000f, speed of 1200mph, sustained turn rate of about 17 D/S less then a F-16's, plus the single engine is to under powered for a jet of that weight, the Missiles they both use are same due to the F-35 not able to use the Meteor at the moment, so both use the 120C/D the 120D max range is about 160km with a max effective range of about 70 to 80km, with the APG-81 on the F-35 being more powerful vs the F-22's APG-77 the F-35 would see the F-22 first but at what range it depends on a lot of things, for example the RCS of both Jets are small but when comparing radars vs RCS most numbers used are from the smallest number on reports, so for example the F-35 can be seen from about 55 to 60km but that is basically front facing, so the F-35 and F-22's RCS range are still in and or around the 100km range from other angles, and due to not always knowing where the enemy is, a F-35 could see a F-22 from about 70km for example, using its APG-81 and not using its IR, for example the Eurofighter's IRST can see the F-35 at around 70+km, due to the heat from the wings that would be the same for the F-22 as well, going back to the Missiles and guns, the 120D is a Single rocket means as soon as its stops the energy is bleeding slowing it down and less agile, with the RWS's on both will see when being locked on to so can start to counter, to try to bleed as much energy from the Missile to lower the hit rate, BVRM's have a bad hit rate at distance already so trying to lower it more is better obviously, plus the F-35 has more Defences like Flares DRS Chaff Jamming and more, but the F-22 has the agility to better bleed the Missiles energy, plus the F-22 has a single inbuilt gun, where the F-35 only the A type has single inbuilt 25mm, the B and C types in gun pods, more rounds then A but has a bigger RCS, for the APG-77 to find.
    So.
    In a WVR fight the F-22 wins against the F-35.
    In a BVR fight the F-35 wins against the F-22.

    • @NCF8710
      @NCF8710 3 роки тому +7

      Where did you get your degree in aerospace engineering?

    • @nstice1
      @nstice1 3 роки тому +4

      The Raptor would smoke the Eurofighter in every area and no it does not have better performance or maneuverability than the F-22 your trying to make Europe sound like they got some cutting edge fighters no that’s so false. The Typhoon was shitty and I won’t even start with the Raphale

    • @j1qqlydixkurayami72
      @j1qqlydixkurayami72 3 роки тому +1

      @@nstice1 the Refale is actually a great jet it denominates the euro fighter

    • @j1qqlydixkurayami72
      @j1qqlydixkurayami72 3 роки тому +2

      The Euro fighter is not more advanced than the F22 the F22 has better situational awareness with a better short range missle for dogfights while having thrust vectoring the F22 engine produces more thrust the F22 only competitor for top gun is the Su57 which only have 1 for combat and 10 for test with already having engine problems and control system malfunctions

    • @HyHwua
      @HyHwua 3 роки тому +2

      The f-22 has no other sensors other than radar? Look up ALR-94...