The Stealth Fighter That America Never Exported

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @NotWhatYouThink
    @NotWhatYouThink  11 місяців тому +944

    Being a single-seat airplane means I'll never get to fly in the F-22 ... BUMMER ...

  • @sangwonpark8967
    @sangwonpark8967 11 місяців тому +1115

    The military base next to my house once hosted a F-22 airshow and it was absolutely one of the loudest things I've head in my life. Damm thing was actually louder than a gun range.
    I went out for groceries and even though the base was about 5~10km away I had to scream at the clerks ear to say anything.

    • @maemilev
      @maemilev 11 місяців тому +13

      Louder than Russia suk hoi? I think Russian jet is the loudest.

    • @ieronon7284
      @ieronon7284 11 місяців тому +19

      @@maemilev probably. I am from Russia and hear weird things sometime that sounds like a jet

    • @KillingMachineMechanic
      @KillingMachineMechanic 11 місяців тому +60

      No bro, I’m a crew chief for F35s, I’ve seen and heard F22s overhead and they are QUIET compared to the F35 man, loudest fighter jet I’ve heard to this day

    • @sangwonpark8967
      @sangwonpark8967 11 місяців тому +2

      @PipelineF35guy Oh yeah, I've heard that as well from my Airforce friends. Can't even imagine the noise.
      I thought explosives were loud

    • @westrim
      @westrim 11 місяців тому +21

      They are capable of being quiet, but during maneuvers and gaining altitude that's out the window.

  • @KD-469
    @KD-469 11 місяців тому +740

    I was at an airshow. and they had an f22 do an backflip. and the plane just broke everything. it did an back flip by going upward and then while staying in the same ALT it just flipped its self. this is the best way I can describe it as there are no words to describe what I saw.

    • @The_Mimewar
      @The_Mimewar 11 місяців тому +47

      Seriously! Seeing them in person, doing things that would stall another plane, or kill the pilot, is amazing

    • @NorthWestKings
      @NorthWestKings 11 місяців тому +3

      @@The_Mimewarif the pilot crashed then he would die, yes

    • @The_Mimewar
      @The_Mimewar 11 місяців тому +30

      @@NorthWestKings not at all what I said or meant

    • @Istandby666
      @Istandby666 11 місяців тому +12

      ​@@NorthWestKings
      Pilots have survived crashes before.
      So, technically NO

    • @KD-469
      @KD-469 11 місяців тому +1

      @@The_MimewarI 100% agree with you!

  • @jonathanmatthews4774
    @jonathanmatthews4774 11 місяців тому +311

    I could just watch footage of the F-22 flying for hours.
    Such an amazing aircraft

    • @productamadeus8745
      @productamadeus8745 11 місяців тому +3

      The Growling Sidewinder F22 fights are cool.

    • @redaries2198
      @redaries2198 9 місяців тому +1

      It’s a sexy aircraft!

  • @americankid7782
    @americankid7782 11 місяців тому +228

    The F-22 and the F-35 are basically spaceships in my mind.
    I was at an Airshow that had an F-35 and it was nuts. It didn’t do any ridiculous stuff but it could turn around so dang fast.
    And them being able to launch missiles at targets that other planes are showing is insane.

    • @TheWebstaff
      @TheWebstaff 10 місяців тому +2

      No if you want a stealthy spaceship plane, Boeing X-37b.

    • @waynestillman8080
      @waynestillman8080 8 місяців тому

      The F35 is not American!! It's us, UK, Spain, and Israel who all invested and developed it. So F35 is not an American plane.

    • @obergruppenfuhrer-
      @obergruppenfuhrer- 8 місяців тому +2

      It's not spaceship because it needs air to fly

    • @locnes2133
      @locnes2133 4 місяці тому

      @@obergruppenfuhrer-dude it’s a rhetorical comparison😟😟😟

  • @Askorti
    @Askorti 11 місяців тому +402

    "Would you intercept me?
    I'd intercept me" - F22 raptor.
    xD

    • @vahidmoosavian6313
      @vahidmoosavian6313 11 місяців тому

      He's sick and tired of this vegan balloon diet shit.
      NEEDS MORE MEAT MEAT IN HIS PLATE😆!

    • @jonpopelka
      @jonpopelka 11 місяців тому +5

      HLC shoutout

    • @keninb7630
      @keninb7630 11 місяців тому +3

      Let him eat.

    • @pawew4397
      @pawew4397 11 місяців тому +6

      I see youre Man of culture as well

    • @BroJiden
      @BroJiden 11 місяців тому

      I'd intercept me sooo hard!

  • @crashburn3292
    @crashburn3292 11 місяців тому +139

    "Since the 1980s Lockheed had already been experimenting with stealth in the F-117 Nighthawk platform." - Lockheed first began working on stealth as far back as the late 1950s. The SR-71 Blackbird, designed in the early 1960s, was an experiment in stealth.

    • @icantcomeupwithagoodusername24
      @icantcomeupwithagoodusername24 10 місяців тому +2

      No, no the sr-71 is fast not stealthy

    • @TheWebstaff
      @TheWebstaff 10 місяців тому +24

      ​@@icantcomeupwithagoodusername24 no the sr-71 was indeed stealthy Vs it's contemporaries.
      All those swooping lines go a long way to shrinking its cross section.
      And stealth goes back to the second world war with a certain British light bomber (mosquito) being made from wood and being very hard to spot on radar.

    • @crashburn3292
      @crashburn3292 10 місяців тому +3

      @@icantcomeupwithagoodusername24 - The Blackbird was entirely designed to be stealthy and achieved it through a combination of its shape, some of the very first composite materials ever used and its characteristics.

    • @icantcomeupwithagoodusername24
      @icantcomeupwithagoodusername24 10 місяців тому +2

      @@crashburn3292 yeah but the main point was to be fast not stealthy as missiles were fired at it. It has more in common with the U2 than the 117

    • @brian60
      @brian60 10 місяців тому +8

      @@crashburn3292 Stealth goes back to 1200BC when they used the Trojan horse

  • @supertracker9823
    @supertracker9823 11 місяців тому +186

    The correct term for the coating on the F22 is not "LO" it's RAM for radiation-absorbent material.
    Supermaneuvrability is not used to dodge missiles (Yes you can jam the WEZ but that's in dogfighting which is very rare). Energy retention is actually superior for dodging missiles in BVR.

    • @WildmanTrading
      @WildmanTrading 11 місяців тому +22

      Most people interpret dogfights as just turn rate, but it is VERY complicated, and generally varies between "One circle" and "Two circle" both having sets of complicated and challenging tactics to exploit the advantages of an aircraft. Growling sidewinder gives great demonstrations for the complexity of dogfights.

    • @Eluderatnight
      @Eluderatnight 11 місяців тому +19

      ​@@WildmanTrading while GS uses perfect theoretical technique DCS cannot compensate for pilot fatigue from constant g loads.

    • @Fake_Slicer
      @Fake_Slicer 11 місяців тому +5

      @@WildmanTrading i mean growling sidewinder uses dcs but ehhh

    • @supertracker9823
      @supertracker9823 11 місяців тому +9

      @@WildmanTrading I understand the complexities of nose-to-nose and nose-to-tail dogfighting. I'm referring to the methods used to defeat moderate to long range fox 3 missiles. In BVR the Raptor primarily benefits from its low observability and high thrust to weight ratio instead of thrust vectoring or supermaneuvrability which are both more suited for one circle dogfighting with high off bore sight fox 2 missiles.

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 11 місяців тому

      @@supertracker9823 Who cares about dogfighting anymore as it is non existent with new stealth technologies. misiles are now fired beyond visual range and why F22 was being retired.

  • @fearthehoneybadger
    @fearthehoneybadger 11 місяців тому +82

    I visited Lockheed/Marietta by invitation of my nephew, who built C130s there. I saw the last run of F22s being built in the same building.

    • @PolarisIII
      @PolarisIII 11 місяців тому +4

      Had a similar oppurtunity with the boy scouts way back in the day to see the last 3 f22s at the same lockheed plant in marietta

    • @davidboatman925
      @davidboatman925 9 місяців тому +1

      And this kind of tour is how the Russians used gummy shoes to pick up the material to take back to their labs and reverse-engineer the coatings.

    • @F___kIT
      @F___kIT 6 місяців тому

      @@davidboatman925that’s a bullshit comment I would say

  • @memento_mori_dori
    @memento_mori_dori 11 місяців тому +57

    Didn't expect for you to drop the F-Bomb 😂

    • @markpukey8
      @markpukey8 4 місяці тому +1

      LOL, he got excited.

  • @ThatoneGuy-zd4rl
    @ThatoneGuy-zd4rl 10 місяців тому +19

    The F22 and F35 are incredible pieces of machinery - it’s art in the deadliest form. God I love this country - US Army Vet

    • @dieselboy610
      @dieselboy610 9 місяців тому +1

      I agree 110%!! I'm also a Army vet served in Iraq 10-12. Cheers

    • @UgurkanAtes-m2e
      @UgurkanAtes-m2e 8 місяців тому +3

      ​@@dieselboy610 yay hurray for death machines what a thing to be proud of

    • @dan4500
      @dan4500 8 місяців тому

      too much soy in your diet boy, be gone.@@UgurkanAtes-m2e

    • @adozub3366
      @adozub3366 6 місяців тому +3

      Wouldn't you prefer to have free Healthcare instead?

    • @Juancollins69
      @Juancollins69 5 місяців тому

      @@UgurkanAtes-m2eit’s why you’re free, bud

  • @tylerakerfeldt7220
    @tylerakerfeldt7220 11 місяців тому +154

    The F-35 is the Hannibal, from the A-Team, of the US military. Intelligent team leader that can combine the best abilities from their team to complete the mission as efficiently as possible. The F-22 acts more like Deadpool. A mutant one man demolition crew that you never see or hear coming

    • @theunluckycharm9637
      @theunluckycharm9637 11 місяців тому +3

      F35 is ultimate information death machine thing, killer.

    • @SilvaDreams
      @SilvaDreams 11 місяців тому

      F-35 is a glorified harrier, it's just a modernized version.

    • @theunluckycharm9637
      @theunluckycharm9637 11 місяців тому +22

      @SilvaDreams f35 is not just a modernized harrier it's a completely different design. A modernized harrier will be a harrier that has been upgraded.

    • @ronjon7942
      @ronjon7942 11 місяців тому +4

      @@SilvaDreams”Just?” You’re really going to trivialize the sweat and blood thousands of smart, dedicated people that created the F-35?

    • @peterroberts7684
      @peterroberts7684 11 місяців тому +1

      I heard the F-35 is shit.😂

  • @Santoroz
    @Santoroz 11 місяців тому +90

    You don't mention they have just been upgrading the Raptor to current tech. I'm happy to see they decided to support the platform.

    • @SilvaDreams
      @SilvaDreams 11 місяців тому +18

      They constantly upgrade the sensors and electronics, they just don't make it public knowledge. Hell the public didn't even know the F-22 existed till 2005

    • @bowez9
      @bowez9 11 місяців тому +3

      ​​@@SilvaDreamstell that to any one in Atlanta, and you will find out otherwise.

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 11 місяців тому +3

      @@bowez9 I used to live near Dobbins Air Force Reserve base. It was so loud after Sept 11th.

    • @Monarch683
      @Monarch683 11 місяців тому +2

      No? F-22s have not been upgraded in a long time. Their production lines ended a long time ago. I don't know where you're getting that information. There have only been upgrade _proposals_ made, not actual upgrades.

    • @DefaultProphet
      @DefaultProphet 11 місяців тому +9

      ⁠​⁠​⁠@@SilvaDreams Not even close. There was a F-22 game in 1997 and it was shown to the public the same year. The YF-22 prototype was shown to the public in 1991 in the press conference awarding Lockheed the ATF contract, not sure if it was public even before then.
      Suffice to say 2005 is very wrong.

  • @UrLocalAirbus
    @UrLocalAirbus 11 місяців тому +85

    My uncle worked on all of the emergency stuff inside of the YF-23. He was a designer. He didn’t do much, but he mainly worked on the ejection seat.

    • @sjsomething4936
      @sjsomething4936 11 місяців тому +15

      At one time Japan was in discussions to make the YF-23 a reality for their own Air Force. I’m not sure what became of that, likely due to NATO pressure they’ll end up purchasing the F-35 but to me the YF-23 is an amazing looking aircraft.

    • @Pooky1973
      @Pooky1973 11 місяців тому

      Would not have been available for export

    • @Pooky1973
      @Pooky1973 11 місяців тому +7

      Japan, has tried over and over again to persuade the US to allow them to purchase the F-22

    • @CAPEjkg
      @CAPEjkg 11 місяців тому +8

      Didn't do much?! He was apart of the YF-23 program, that's plenty.

    • @milwaukeegregg
      @milwaukeegregg 11 місяців тому +3

      Didn't do much? TELL THAT TO THE GUY THAT NEEDED THAT SEAT......

  • @Nesstor01
    @Nesstor01 11 місяців тому +57

    This thing is 10x more stealthy than the first production stealth plane which is the F-117 Nighthawk. For reference, 10 Nighthawks hovered above Baghdad in 1991 for over an hour without the Iraqis knowing before they dropped their bombs on key infrastructure in Baghdad. Baghdad was the most heavily fortified and secured location at that time in the world and these things just sat their non-chalant over Baghdad.
    Edit - Nighthawks RCS is 0.001
    F22 RCS is 0.0001
    One is the size of a golfball and the other is the size of a bumblebee.

    • @worldoftancraft
      @worldoftancraft 11 місяців тому

      yes. Continue to masturbate on the very real, and, truly something telling number. Because it's idiots in military which display heat emissions from aircraft in a complicated "hedgehog" shaped graph over flat plane top-down view. With pike, obviously being at the back.
      Yet with radar reflect ability, you can just give a number XD, commoner will "eat" that.
      You are hilarious, sect of low aR-Cee-eS witnesses.

    • @jackbower8671
      @jackbower8671 11 місяців тому

      You're actually incorrect. The F117 is the stealthiest aircraft we have

    • @Nesstor01
      @Nesstor01 11 місяців тому +19

      @@jackbower8671 actually you're incorrect. The F22 is stealthier than the F117.
      F22 RCS 0.0001
      F117 RCS 0.001

    • @tdawg5742
      @tdawg5742 11 місяців тому +10

      ​@@jackbower8671 The f22 is way more stealthy than the f117.

    • @Evinthal84
      @Evinthal84 11 місяців тому +10

      @@Nesstor01 and that 0.0001 RCS is the unclassified number. In all reality it is probably better than that given how much the US under reports what it's equipment is capable of. US do be living by the mantra of "better to under-promise and over-deliver, than to over-promise and under-deliver."

  • @edwardbryan9501
    @edwardbryan9501 11 місяців тому +85

    When nobody knows the F-22's missions or even seen them fight, then THAT is how stealthy they are.

    • @SilvaDreams
      @SilvaDreams 11 місяців тому +34

      Considering one litterally snuck up on two Iranian jets and politely told them to go home... yeah.

    • @TornaitSuperBird
      @TornaitSuperBird 11 місяців тому +7

      Can't cite my source unfortunately, but the F-22 has a radar cross-section of equivalent size to a bumblebee.
      It'll be extremely difficult to make anything that can top this in stealth capabilities.

    • @SilvaDreams
      @SilvaDreams 11 місяців тому +2

      @@TornaitSuperBird Smaller actually, the B-2 bomber has a radar cross section of about 0.01 inches and the F-22 is 0.001

    • @starvlingk5122
      @starvlingk5122 11 місяців тому

      @@SilvaDreams radar cross section for military jets means nothing today, by design

    • @Ali-hu8jr
      @Ali-hu8jr 29 днів тому

      Yeah, it's battle proven vs the most formidable and advanced super aircraft in the world: chinese balloon.

  • @SergioHidalgoAero
    @SergioHidalgoAero 11 місяців тому +7

    This channel is pure Gold. Period.

  • @davidreynolds3082
    @davidreynolds3082 10 місяців тому +3

    It's like when you were a kid, you'd never let anyone else play with your favourite marble. It was that special ;)

  • @nzee8505
    @nzee8505 8 місяців тому +5

    They're afraid that accidentally they will sell Starscream

  • @colinarner790
    @colinarner790 5 місяців тому +2

    Was near Langley today and got to watch 6 raptors and 2 or 3 trainers do maneuvers. Second favorite plane of all time. Absolutely beautiful jer

  • @Uebagi
    @Uebagi 11 місяців тому +13

    5:05 radar absorbing material pre exsisted the f-117. The shape and geometry was the leap forward, not the paint. The smoothness of the B2 and F22 is due to improvements in computer technologies that can calculate and model the required shape.

    • @definitelynotjasonmomoa
      @definitelynotjasonmomoa 6 місяців тому +1

      Yup, first plane they used ram on was the sr-71

    • @Ralfi_PoELA
      @Ralfi_PoELA Місяць тому

      Some dude said the Mosquito was the first stealth aircraft because it was made of wood. 💀💀💀 I was thinking well what about the things beyond the wood like the frame, the bombs....

  • @fenfire3824
    @fenfire3824 8 місяців тому +2

    Stealth Bombers and Jets are the by far most important weapon in an army. Who has the most and best of them, will win huge wars.

  • @Vyzard
    @Vyzard 11 місяців тому +9

    I always loved the overall design of the F22 the most. I hope it's replacement would be just as sleek

  • @LordVulcan93
    @LordVulcan93 11 місяців тому +8

    People forget how awesome the YF-23 was.

    • @QuantumNova
      @QuantumNova 6 місяців тому +1

      Japan uses them by the way. They didn't go to waste thankfully.

  • @briancavanagh7048
    @briancavanagh7048 11 місяців тому +3

    The English Electric Lightning was one of the first aircraft to exceed the speed of sound in level flight without using after burning.
    The F106 was capable of low supersonic speeds without afterburner but with a significant range penalty.

  • @jackkunasaki5044
    @jackkunasaki5044 11 місяців тому +4

    The kid getting his own video, love it

  • @miormuhamadhafiz3862
    @miormuhamadhafiz3862 11 місяців тому +4

    This reminds me of C&C Generals, an air-to-air combat fighter jet. F-22 Raptor.

  • @LSUfan
    @LSUfan 8 місяців тому +1

    Very nice video. Thank you for posting it!

  • @krishivrathore3894
    @krishivrathore3894 11 місяців тому +3

    ive been waiting for this video for so long

  • @DeetexSeraphine
    @DeetexSeraphine 10 місяців тому +1

    Back when I was younger, and the Discovery channel wasn't channeling MTV specials... I saw this documentary once, that implied that the Raptor's paralel edges aid in its " LO "
    Viewed from above, the leading edges of the air intakes match those of the wings and the airelons.
    From the front, the Stabelizers line up with the intakes as well, as they do with the Hull intself.
    These paralel lines match with all the panels that can open as well....
    I always believed this to be part of why it's sooooo stealthy, but to be honest, my ghast is thuroughly flabbered at the lack of mention to this fact, over the many years that the '22 has been covered now.

  • @ChloeKruegerSenpai
    @ChloeKruegerSenpai 11 місяців тому +3

    Chinese accesing VPN to watch this NWYT's video: *Write that down, Write that down*

  • @Raceb8420
    @Raceb8420 11 місяців тому +4

    I'm never going to question the intent of inbound steel marbles again!!

  • @bgezal
    @bgezal 11 місяців тому +15

    It's the ultimate strategy for not being shot down. Not being in a combat zone at all.

    • @ramongossler1726
      @ramongossler1726 8 місяців тому +1

      thats the cool thing about stealth, you are not able to tell the difference if you are not flying the raptor

  • @frankleespeaking9519
    @frankleespeaking9519 11 місяців тому +2

    The f22 program is one of many examples where a weapon system is so expensive that you don’t want to risk losing one in combat and/or get shot down in enemy territory. Yet it is so good you don’t want to make them available for overseas sales.. which makes them more expensive… which makes you not want to lose them…. Etc etc….

  • @Haarschmuckfachgeschafttadpole
    @Haarschmuckfachgeschafttadpole 11 місяців тому +6

    Afterburners also use a ton of fuel.

  • @Schimenator
    @Schimenator 11 місяців тому +1

    I worked on S-3's years ago that were designed in the 70's. They also had gold colored windscreens. We were told it was a thin layer of gold to protect against EMP.

  • @markedis5902
    @markedis5902 11 місяців тому +15

    The harrier was a fantastic bird. That was when British industry really rocked

    • @joshbrookes6439
      @joshbrookes6439 11 місяців тому +2

      a fantastic bird huh? Is that your opinion or a documented fact? The Brits shocked the world with the Harrier it was a truly impressive engineering masterpiece for the time, and as an 1980s/90s kid growing up the Harrier posters covered my bedroom walls for many years I admit I was obsessed with this thing, utterly besotted. However the highest pedastool it once sat aloft would quickly disintegrate when the internet came along and all of a sudden I had access to more information than I ever thought possible and thru that enthusiastic exploration of information about the Harrier was countless ex and serving RAF guys who thru countless interviews docos podcasts ect actually set the record straight about this POS (their words) having a keen fondness for an old flame you went through a lot of hard times together is one thing but I can honestly say I've ever heard a Harrier pilot refer to it as a "FANTASTIC BIRD"

  • @chadnelson1777
    @chadnelson1777 11 місяців тому +3

    The F-22 is my all time favorite jet. And is still the king of the skies

  • @lmouhcine
    @lmouhcine 6 місяців тому +3

    she came out without a scratch against a baloon - wow impressive.

    • @QuantumNova
      @QuantumNova 6 місяців тому

      It was a really big balloon... Scary too.

  • @incognitomode3586
    @incognitomode3586 8 місяців тому +1

    Coming back from a dogfight with a balloon without a scratch. Nice to hear.

  • @falkenlaser
    @falkenlaser 11 місяців тому +20

    What’s crazy is the F-22 is a 30 year old design, yet no other country has made anything that can come close to its capabilities. This would be like the US first developing the F-15 and F-16 in the 1950’s while the Russians developed the MiG-29 and Su-27 in the 80’s.

    • @LoneStarMillennial
      @LoneStarMillennial 11 місяців тому +1

      You are very ignorant. The F-22 is outclassed by Russian rivals. We, the US, hasn't made a serious fighter plane since the F-15.

    • @zee_terminator2850
      @zee_terminator2850 11 місяців тому +36

      @@LoneStarMillennialthat’s the funniest thing i have ever heard, thanks for the laughs. In all seriousness though you would have to be brainwashed or know nothing about jets to think the russians beat us at the moment

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 11 місяців тому +5

      That's what I've been saying - and the fact that the US has at least stealth fighters, bombers, and drones as well as a stealth helicopter while everybody else is stuck at 4.5 gen technology is insane. As well as having flying prototypes of 6th gen fighters.

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 11 місяців тому +22

      @@LoneStarMillennial Russians are so stealthy nobody can find their 5th Gen planes.

    • @johnoliver4739
      @johnoliver4739 11 місяців тому

      ​@@LoneStarMillennial😂🤣😂🤣😂 drink that kool aid... That's why every ally backed out of the SU-57 program ... Reduced visibility at best, unreliable motors, crashing in tests, only 11 built 🤦 the f-22 and the f-35 would roll anything Russia has up with minimal losses if any

  • @Istandby666
    @Istandby666 11 місяців тому +2

    The YF-22 and YF-23 are 1986 designs. From the ATF program at Edwards Air Force Base.
    We were program 23.

  • @flightonlineaviation
    @flightonlineaviation 11 місяців тому +8

    Fascinating - funny how the Raptor is kept within the US while the F-35 (which is supposedly more advanced) is being delivered to other countries

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 11 місяців тому +5

      Actually later on the F22 was considered to be exported but by then the F35 programme was being done and USA never really bothered with a export version.
      Considering Australia is getting nuclear sub tech. F22 is not special technology. F35 has more advanced technology also.
      And guess what air to air dogfighting is obsolete now. with the stealth technology of the F35 etc it is all about firing beyond visual range.

    • @virginccyy7645
      @virginccyy7645 11 місяців тому

      Because it needs like 12 countries to produce all the parts, so even with US's massive tech sector, the F35 is so complicated and advanced that China or no other country alone can create the F35 alone!

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 11 місяців тому

      The lines were destroyed after production stopped. The same factory space is being used to build the F-35.

    • @unclebob8746
      @unclebob8746 10 місяців тому

      To be able to afford the F-35, the US worked with many of it's allies to boost overall production and lower costs. Didn't work so well, F-35 so over budget and late of deliveries, many countries pulled out all together and others reduced the number committed to. Another great example of the military-industrial complex taking US citizens to the bank....

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 10 місяців тому +1

      @@unclebob8746 You are mixing up different issues to meaninglessness.
      More buyers allows economy of scale. It does not iron out production problems or the issues of making new technology work.

  • @anthonyr.589
    @anthonyr.589 10 місяців тому +2

    I remember back in 1999, I had Jane's USAF fight simulator. I used to play it every day the entire summer on my windows 98 se machine. Back then the f-15 was everywhere. But I remember playing that game and flying the f-22 and wondering why no one was talking about this plane. The F-16 was more fun in dogfighting cause you could turn, bleed speed and gain it at will. But the F-22 was still pretty fun to fly.

    • @Ralfi_PoELA
      @Ralfi_PoELA Місяць тому

      You must be from Los Angeles because I felt like we knew about the F-22 before everyone else. I remember the big rivalry between the Y-23 and the Y-22 rivalry was a big deal in the 90's.

    • @anthonyr.589
      @anthonyr.589 Місяць тому

      @Ralfi_PoELA Actually no. I'm not from the Los Angeles. I was just really into airplanes. I didn't find out about the Y-22 and Y-23 competition until maybe 2003. There used to be a channel called Discovery Wings that had all kinds of airplane documentaries.. I used to watch that channel religiously.

  • @Corteum
    @Corteum 11 місяців тому +8

    What??? The Raptor came out of a dogfight with a balloon, unscratched, you say? HOW??? HOW is that even possible?! There's just NO WAY that any ordinary jet could take on a balloon and not lose! This is a clear demonstration of air-to-air superiority by ANY measure. No balloons are safe! 🤣 LMAO 🎈

    • @markpukey8
      @markpukey8 4 місяці тому

      Yeah. If YOU were an F22, you'd be conflicted too. First, you got to kill something. But second, you killed a balloon instead of a Russian SU-whatthefuckever or a Chinese J-IswearI'mstealthyHonest!
      They were designed for elite prey... and got used ONCE to shoot down a balloon. So sad.

    • @shirsenduchakraborty227
      @shirsenduchakraborty227 2 місяці тому +1

      exactly, I've the same question 😂

  • @glptvxd5446
    @glptvxd5446 11 місяців тому +1

    Thanls for the Video!

  • @pogsterplays
    @pogsterplays 11 місяців тому +9

    I am/was making a plane in Brick Rigs (a video game), but I could never get the ailerons to work properly.
    I'd never thought about thrust vectoring (or that typa thing).
    Until I watched this video.
    Maybe I'll come back here and leave a comment if it goes well later.

  • @Boeing_hitsquad
    @Boeing_hitsquad 11 місяців тому +1

    Re: Supercruise - the F-18ABCD/CF-188AB can supercruise with wingtip Sidewinders and fuselage aim-7/120s

  • @metrunui8224
    @metrunui8224 11 місяців тому +5

    "would you intercept me?
    I'd intercept me"
    -22

  • @ninjaundermyskin
    @ninjaundermyskin 9 місяців тому +2

    The best match the F-22 ever had was against Iron Man.

  • @jackjones9460
    @jackjones9460 11 місяців тому +18

    The F22 has been deployed worldwide almost continuously since it was first fielded! Since they can cloak no one ever sees them except during public air shows. No other country even shows them on their budget, it’s that stealthy!

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 11 місяців тому

      What a load of BS no stealth is invisible. just the stealth makes them harder to detect at certain long ranges depending on the radar system. OTHR over the horizon radars can detect stealth better and whymore and more countries are bringing them back in.
      Australia has the biggest most advanced OTHR and stealth planes of USA were never invisible to it and even F35 was tested against it.

    • @Versuffe
      @Versuffe 11 місяців тому +22

      The SU-57 is so stealthy that they couldn’t find enough for a squadron!

  • @0fficer47
    @0fficer47 6 місяців тому +2

    "WoulD YoU IntErcePT mE? ID InTeRcEpt mE"

  • @earthenvessels7835
    @earthenvessels7835 11 місяців тому +3

    The reason for the F-117's flat panels and straight lines is not what you think!
    Lockheed's Skunk Works used computers to model radar reflections, but at the time they were not powerful enough to model curves. So they just designed a low-poly aircraft instead!

  • @martz5794
    @martz5794 6 місяців тому

    I ate my dinner whilst watching this. Thankyou NWYT

  • @cecilchance5843
    @cecilchance5843 6 місяців тому +3

    Did you know F 22's have been on numerous missions around the globe but they're so stealthy that nobody knows anything about those missions 😮

    • @markpukey8
      @markpukey8 4 місяці тому

      Those damn balloons know!

  • @mtnslyr
    @mtnslyr 11 місяців тому +1

    There is too much emphasis on the plane but the real battle winner is the missiles. There’s reason why every pilot is more concerned about what the opponent is packing and not what they’re flying.

  • @olgagagarina4166
    @olgagagarina4166 11 місяців тому +26

    lol it’s first combat was with a balloon. That’s less of a dog fight and more of a dog and a chew toy 😂

    • @Cody38Super
      @Cody38Super 11 місяців тому +3

      I believe HLC described it as the "F-22 Thumbtack", cause all it's ever done is pop a baloon. That and not be seen by Iranian or F-4 radar, sneaking up on two of them and then telling them to go home.

    • @amb1u5
      @amb1u5 11 місяців тому

      The only unclassified missions, I do believe it was used to push russian mercenaries back in Turkey? Syria? Not sure.

    • @Cody38Super
      @Cody38Super 11 місяців тому +4

      @@amb1u5 Wagner in Syria. ConocoPhillips oil field.

    • @kdcustoms1272
      @kdcustoms1272 11 місяців тому

      A win is a win.

  • @kaceecruson9532
    @kaceecruson9532 10 місяців тому

    I lived close to Tyndall AFB in college and the Raptors used to fly over all the time... It was awesome!!

  • @TheLiamster
    @TheLiamster 11 місяців тому +11

    I wish that the original order of 750 F-22s were produced and the navy also had a variant of the F-22

    • @shinobishen7262
      @shinobishen7262 11 місяців тому

      Agreed, but allegedly, the reason we haven't sold them is because we wanted to make an even better one. I think the Super Raptor is being produced or is planning to be produced soon

    • @ronjon7942
      @ronjon7942 11 місяців тому

      Yes, yes, yes. I’m starting a GoFundMe to restart the production line.

    • @Ralfi_PoELA
      @Ralfi_PoELA Місяць тому

      It's because the cold war ended and the Soviet Union collapsed right when they were being produced it wasn't needed. Still somewhat not needed now that nations have their own poor man bombers and can break a leg without the US getting directly involved with their regional disputes. 👌🏾

  • @Aligoharkhan369
    @Aligoharkhan369 5 місяців тому +2

    I am getting two of these jets one for myself and one for my daughter

  • @zr4937
    @zr4937 11 місяців тому +10

    4:12 stealthy as.. oh, fog 😂

  • @goldenguyy8655
    @goldenguyy8655 11 місяців тому +2

    By any chance do you think you could make a video on the Royal Australian Navy? (Also, love your videos)

  • @FTL1511
    @FTL1511 11 місяців тому +3

    Separate video on YF23 please.

  • @paolobagares2522
    @paolobagares2522 4 місяці тому +1

    "...Came out of that dog fight without a scratch" 😂😂😂 fight was with a balloon! 0:10

  • @leannefresquez3490
    @leannefresquez3490 11 місяців тому +5

    The f22 is the sexiest looking jet ever. My fav used to be the f15 but the f22 is just so much better imo

    • @DocWolph
      @DocWolph 11 місяців тому

      Fans of the F-14 Tomcat demand to differ who is the sexiest plane of all time.

    • @Ralfi_PoELA
      @Ralfi_PoELA Місяць тому

      SR-71 Blackbird is a literal spacecraft.

  • @milowannebo-sorensen1776
    @milowannebo-sorensen1776 11 місяців тому +1

    HE SWEARED! WHAT A GLORIOUS DAY

  • @doubledoublelem
    @doubledoublelem 11 місяців тому +10

    Raptor is great, but it hasn't gotten much chance to prove itself.

    • @ivanlagrossemoule
      @ivanlagrossemoule 11 місяців тому

      It was gimped from the start anyway. It never got all the sensors it was meant to and then they never really bothered with the much needed upgrades. The only positive is that the NGAD is coming earlier so they can retire the F-22.

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 11 місяців тому +1

      That's actually good.

    • @Ralfi_PoELA
      @Ralfi_PoELA Місяць тому

      The F-35 is proof they were because the British, Israelis, Japan, S., Australia, and S. Korea all cried when they couldn't purchase F-22's. 😂😂😂

  • @ShadeMeister93
    @ShadeMeister93 10 місяців тому +1

    when you got a jet so good, everyone is afraid to have to fight it

  • @N17C1
    @N17C1 11 місяців тому +4

    There is a (now declassified) report that shows that the US thought that selling the F22 to Canada and Australia would enhance US security. Not only did the report say it was ok to sell to Australia but that it would be in US interests to do so because it was reduce the cost of basing US aircraft in the Pacific. But after lobbying by the F35 manufacturers, the US government banned all exports of the F22 because it would reduce the sales of F35s. In the early days of the programme, the F35 struggled with sales because no one wanted it. It's not a great fighter and not a great attack aircraft. Those countries that needed an Air Defence fighter all wanted the F22. So, the ban in sales enabled the F35 programme to survive. Not the first time that US industry has put security of the US second to profits.

    • @Ralfi_PoELA
      @Ralfi_PoELA Місяць тому

      Who's going to attack us? Ze Germans? 💀💀💀 It was a consideration that was introduced it wasn't mandatory. Plus the Soviet Union collapsed when they got produced. The F-35 wasn't the result of no one wanting them it was the result of Britain, Israel, Japan, S. Korea, Australia, and others wanting to purchase the F-22 so the US made the poor mans version of a somewhat stealth fighter, somewhat 5th gen multirole aircraft for them to purchase. It was an international program. 😂😂😂

  • @DenshyOwO
    @DenshyOwO 11 місяців тому +1

    I too love the piss yellow Canopy that yells "Hey, look at me!"

  • @patrickcarter4012
    @patrickcarter4012 11 місяців тому +8

    Is the true speed of the f-22 classified?? Just asking because i dont know. Ive been wondering what the true top speed is for it?? It looks fast as hell. Its a great plane, but my favorite jet is the F-14.

    • @sc1338
      @sc1338 11 місяців тому +7

      They only list it as Mach 2+ my guess would be around Mach 2.5 but I think the stealth coatings get damaged when they go over a certain speed

    • @ronjon7942
      @ronjon7942 11 місяців тому

      @@sc1338ya…heat damage.

    • @nighthawk4028
      @nighthawk4028 11 місяців тому

      It can fly out of tricky situation at close to mach 3 using afterburner.

  • @ricklee4220
    @ricklee4220 11 місяців тому +1

    HARV is such an amazing test vehicle

  • @unsatisfiedfans7422
    @unsatisfiedfans7422 11 місяців тому +8

    My uncle once works on F-22 development. He is a janitor, and he cleaned the room used for engineers to brainstorm and develop any nerd stuff to build this jet fighter

    • @PherPhur
      @PherPhur 11 місяців тому +1

      That's actually an accomplishment more magnificent than like 99.99% of humans on earth. Things like fusion reactors, state of the art avionics, quantum computers, these things are peak technology of humans. And to work on the best of the best when it comes to a fighter jet, it don't matter what the fuck you did, if you whiffed the fart of the guy who cleaned the room the engineers used you're a superstar.

    • @mightypsychobat9144
      @mightypsychobat9144 10 місяців тому +2

      "During a visit to the NASA Space Centre in 1962, President Kennedy noticed a janitor carrying a broom. He interrupted his tour, walked over to the man and said: “Hi, I'm Jack Kennedy, what are you doing?” The janitor responded: “I'm helping put a man on the moon, Mr President.”"

    • @JoshuaTootell
      @JoshuaTootell 10 місяців тому +1

      Imagine those engineers having to clean their own restrooms.
      Yeah, even janitors are important.

  • @matthewsecord7641
    @matthewsecord7641 6 місяців тому +1

    Brilliant intro.

  • @ricdale7813
    @ricdale7813 11 місяців тому +2

    Had the USAF chosen the YF 23, Lockeed would had still gotten a chunk of the contract. Northrop couldnt concurrently build the B2's and YF23's in the numbers required and would sure have had a partnership with Lockeed producing assemblies. The Super computer model too date still puts the 23 well ahead of the 22 in terms of far thinking and far relevancy design. The 22 is Awesome but the 23 would had likely been more capable and in the end cheaper per unit. I still think the new Stealth fighter coming out is very much akin with the 23's design and thinking. 2024 should be telling.

    • @gibster9624
      @gibster9624 10 місяців тому +1

      I think that is more wishful thinking than anything else. There is nothing that says for sure that the 23 would have been stealthier especially since data points covered show that the 22 had a better horizontal profile. 22 also had better supercruise so getting from target to target faster without afterburner means it could carry out more assignments which isn't factored into the cost per flight.

  • @gunmetalrook432
    @gunmetalrook432 11 місяців тому +1

    Awesome vid. Favorite fighter jet by far.

  • @ibbano1
    @ibbano1 11 місяців тому +3

    It took the Americans over 30 years to manufacture a fighter jet with THRUST VICTOR burners to perform the COBRA maneuver.. 30 years before that (of not more) the Russians DID that maneuver with both the SU-27 and the MIG-29 and WITHOUT The thrust Victor engines

    • @sH-ed5yf
      @sH-ed5yf 11 місяців тому +7

      The era of dogfight is over. Such a Manöver is nice in shows but it wont help you if a march 3 AA missle is aiming at you.

    • @Monarch683
      @Monarch683 11 місяців тому +2

      You must be horribly uneducated if you think that the cobra maneuver is actually a viable combat maneuver.

  • @practicalshooter6517
    @practicalshooter6517 11 місяців тому +2

    Is this due to the stealthiness of the F22 that I didn't see it on this entire video?

  • @swetangsharma
    @swetangsharma 11 місяців тому +4

    So much talk about thrust vectoring and supermenouverability while casually ignoring the Sukhoi family
    Edit 1:
    Su family had first production thrust vectoring aircraft, all while Raptor or X-31 were under development.
    X-31 was a knee jerk reaction to the Russian advances in thrust vectoring. The US still lags in the tech
    Even F35 was inspired from Yak-141 duct fan (which was based on French designs).
    Any rational commentator would push that reference in.

    • @sc1338
      @sc1338 11 місяців тому +1

      And? it’s not stealth really

    • @Tigerdriver91Academy
      @Tigerdriver91Academy 11 місяців тому +2

      This video isn't even about Suckoi 😂

    • @Monarch683
      @Monarch683 11 місяців тому +2

      Video isn't even about Sukhoi. Keep coping, Vatnik.

    • @swetangsharma
      @swetangsharma 11 місяців тому

      ​@@Monarch683 Just because you're uneducated, does't mean you should openly proclaim so.
      Su family had first production thrust vectoring aircraft, all while Raptor or X-31 were under development.
      X-31 was a knee jerk reaction to the Russian advances in thrust vectoring. The US still lags in the tech
      Even F35 was inspired from Yak-141 duct fan (which was based on French designs).
      Any rational commentator would push that reference in.

  • @corujariousa
    @corujariousa 10 місяців тому

    And the ones that exist will never be replaced. The production platforms no longer exist.

  • @ZeePanzer
    @ZeePanzer 7 місяців тому +1

    Put two external fuel tanks on the F22 is like having an ghillie sniper carrying an giant backpack.

  • @johndolenc7658
    @johndolenc7658 11 місяців тому

    Hi nwyt, great vid here!

  • @Freesavh1776
    @Freesavh1776 11 місяців тому

    I love this channel's videos. I especially love the narrator, his voice is great for the job. Plus his funny little quibs are great. I just wish I didn't have to wait so long between videos. I'm not Russian, but hint hint knudge knudge...😂

  • @atahirince
    @atahirince 11 місяців тому +1

    'dog fight with baloon without a scratch' 🤣🤣🤣

  • @RedFatDragon
    @RedFatDragon 2 місяці тому +1

    “F-22 Raptor as you can see is SSSUPER maneuverable… no, really, she is super maneuverable!”
    SU-37: “Hold My Vodka”…
    *Switches Physics OFF*

  • @shashankdogra
    @shashankdogra 6 місяців тому

    Doing all that still making it look Cool AF, That's Dope!

  • @MichaelK.Wasserman
    @MichaelK.Wasserman 5 місяців тому

    The F-117 was retired from active service in 2008, marking the end of an era for this pioneering stealth aircraft. Its legacy continues to influence modern stealth technology and the design of future aircraft, showcasing its enduring impact on military aviation despite its relatively short operational lifespan.

    • @MetalFalcon99
      @MetalFalcon99 4 місяці тому

      I think they still have a few flying for adversaries during training

  • @notamazonbasics134
    @notamazonbasics134 10 місяців тому

    At 4:14 he says “Because the raptor is stealthy as… Friiiiick” but he said it so smoothly 😭

  • @deadstreet1675
    @deadstreet1675 11 місяців тому +1

    1997!! That's mad to think it's been in the sky for that long...

    • @cecilchance5843
      @cecilchance5843 6 місяців тому +2

      Imagine what they don't show us😢

  • @MK-Dukes-mg3bq
    @MK-Dukes-mg3bq 5 місяців тому

    F22 Raptor is the deadliest Fighter Aircraft. No match for this beast.

  • @thebackyardfamilyoutfitter7284
    @thebackyardfamilyoutfitter7284 Місяць тому

    Damn that's a terrifyingly beautiful bird. Sounds like they put an F15 on a diet, made it stealth, and smart then sent it back in time from 2050. Hard to believe we had this tech for over 3 decades and no other country has quite figured out how to match or kill it. When I look at that jet I see, and feel air superiority. I guess that's why I'm proud the most terrifying thing to fly since the cretaceous period is in our defense portfolio.

  • @davidstein7113
    @davidstein7113 11 місяців тому +2

    where's the link for the deep dive into the X31?

  • @krystalmae5557
    @krystalmae5557 11 місяців тому +2

    Can you do a video about the russian cruiser Rf Varyag

  • @unlearnr
    @unlearnr 11 місяців тому +1

    "Came out of that dog fight without a scratch" - dog fight against a balloon??? HAHAHA

  • @Xx-Anwar-xX
    @Xx-Anwar-xX 6 місяців тому

    the f117 will alwasy be the only jet fighter that felt like coming from the future . it really looked extra terestrial .nothing looks like it even today .

  • @Dasycottus
    @Dasycottus 7 місяців тому

    That "Stealthy as FUCCCK" came out of nowhere and got a serious guffaw out of me

  • @banger1965
    @banger1965 12 днів тому

    Time to do an update of this video.

  • @JadeMythriil
    @JadeMythriil 10 місяців тому

    F-22 is the sexiest aircraft ever designed! I don't think any aircraft will ever top it.

  • @MarulHavuc122
    @MarulHavuc122 6 місяців тому

    It was nicknamed: "The lockhead Martin" It's know as the first 6th generation fighter jet and the strongest one of all of them. It's engines is too complicated for a scientist to even study it, as it would take roughly 10 years for the f22 raptor's engine to be studied if captured. It's arsenal contains six AIM-120 AMMRAAMs and two AIM-9 Sidewinners. It also has a special helmet that is cappable of "Look-Down, Shoot-Down" feature, this allows the pilot to shoot down targets by just merely looking at them, with bening the worlds stealthiest fighter jet, the raptor still claims the air superiority, until NGAD takes over the role of the f22.

  • @jeanbambois7970
    @jeanbambois7970 10 місяців тому

    i like the title cause that mean that F35 is bad enough for your "friend"